Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Focus Review
  • Published:

Development of an advanced reverse osmosis membrane based on detailed nanostructure analysis

Abstract

Due to an increase in the number and severity of water shortages worldwide, reverse osmosis (RO) membrane technologies are widely used for seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation. There are increasing demands for enhancing the water production rate and solute rejection rate to obtain higher quality water by consuming less energy. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the nanoscale structure and permeation mechanism of RO membranes. Typical RO membranes have a composite structure, with an ultrathin separation functional layer of cross-linked fully aromatic polyamide. The functional layer has sub-μm sized protuberance structures and sub-nm sized water channels. The protuberance structures were quantitatively examined by advanced TEM techniques. The relationship between the membrane performance and morphological parameters of protuberance structures was revealed. Hydrated structures are formed by the complex intermolecular interactions between polymers and water molecules. The structure was investigated by neutron scattering measurements and molecular dynamics simulations. In the water-rich polyamide/water system, water molecules are well connected to each other to form water channels. Based on the above results, innovative RO membranes are being developed through the precise control of nanostructures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurihara M, Ito Y. Sustainable seawater reverse osmosis desalination as green desalination in the 21st century. J Membr Sci Res. 2020;6:20–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Loeb S, Sourirajan S. Sea Water Demineralization by Means of an Osmotic Membrane. In: Saline water conversion II. Vol. 38. Washington D.C.: American Chemical Society; 1963. p. 117–32.

  3. Cadotte JE. Evolution of Composite Reverse Osmosis Membranes. In: Materials science of synthetic membranes. Vol. 269. Washington D.C.: American Chemical Society; 1985. p. 273–94.

  4. Kurihara M, Sasaki T, Nakatsuji K, Kimura M, Henmi M. Low pressure SWRO membrane for desalination in the Mega-ton Water System. Desalination. 2015;368:135–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin L, Lopez R, Ramon GZ, Coronell O. Investigating the void structure of the polyamide active layers of thin-film composite membranes. J Membr Sci. 2016;497:365–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurihara M, Hanakawa M. Mega-ton water system: Japanese national research and development project on seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation. Desalination. 2013;308:131–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Song X, Smith JW, Kim J, Zaluzec NJ, Chen W, An H, et al. Unraveling the morphology–function relationships of polyamide membranes using quantitative electron tomography. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:8517–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Petersen RJ. Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Memb Sci. 1993;83:81–150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matthews TD, Yan H, Cahill DG, Coronell O, Mariñas BJ. Growth dynamics of interfacially polymerized polyamide layers by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and Rutherford backscattering spectrometry. J Membr Sci. 2013;429:71–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Freger V. Kinetics of film formation by interfacial polycondensation. Langmuir. 2005;21:1884–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Behera S, Suresh AK. Kinetics of interfacial polycondensation reactions—development of a new method and its validation. Polymers. 2017;127:28–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nowbahar A, Mansard V, Mecca JM, Paul M, Arrowood T, Squires TM. Measuring interfacial polymerization kinetics using microfluidic interferometry. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140:3173–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomioka H, Henmi M, Nakatsuji K, Kurihara M. High boron removal seawater RO membrane. in: Proceedings of 4th international membrane conference. 2007.

  14. Kawakami T, Nakada M, Shimura H, Okada K, Kimura M. Hydration structure of reverse osmosis membranes studied via neutron scattering and atomistic molecular simulation. Polym J. 2018;50:327–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Surblys D, Yamada T, Thomsen B, Kawakami T, Shigemoto I, Okabe J, et al. Amide A band is a fingerprint for water dynamics in reverse osmosis polyamide membranes. J Memb Sci. 2020;596:117705.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Movement of water molecules in reverse osmosis membranes was elucidated. Press release by Toray Industries, Inc. 2016. (in Japanese). https://cs2.toray.co.jp/news/toray/newsrrs01.nsf/0/13ECA84A5EC207EF49258045001B550B?open. Accessed 15 Oct 2021.

  17. Robeson LM. The upper bound revisited. J Memb Sci. 2008;320:390–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang Z, Guo H, Tang CY. The upper bound of thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide membranes for desalination. J Membr Sci. 2019;590:117297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lim YJ, Goh K, Kurihara M, Wang R. Seawater desalination by reverse osmosis: current development and future challenges in membrane fabrication—a review. J Membr Sci. 2021;629:119292.

  20. Shen Y, Saboe PO, Sines IT, Erbakan M, Kumar M. Biomimetic membranes: a review. J Memb Sci. 2014;454:359–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Henmi M, Nakatsuji K, Ichikawa T, Tomioka H, Sakamoto T, Yoshio M, et al. Self-organized liquid-crystalline nanostructured membranes for water treatment: selective permeation of ions. Adv Mater. 2012;24:2238–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakamoto T, Ogawa T, Nada H, Nakatsuji K, Mitani M, Soberats B, et al. Development of nanostructured water treatment membranes based on thermotropic liquid crystals: molecular design of sub-nanoporous materials. Adv Sci. 2018;5:1700405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Watanabe R, Sakamoto T, Yamazoe K, Miyawaki J, Kato T, Harada Y. Ion selectivity of water molecules in subnanoporous liquid‐crystalline water‐treatment membranes: a structural study of hydrogen bonding. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59:23461–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harutoki Shimura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimura, H. Development of an advanced reverse osmosis membrane based on detailed nanostructure analysis. Polym J 54, 767–773 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-022-00627-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-022-00627-x

Search

Quick links