Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Application of a sodium alginate hydrogel for clear preoperative endoscopic marking using India ink

Abstract

Preoperative marking or tattooing is a clinical procedure conducted during laparoscopic surgeries in which gastrointestinal lesions are identified by injecting India ink. However, diffusion of the carbon particles from the ink leads to its spreading in the surrounding tissues, resulting in unnecessarily extensive tissue resectioning. In this study, we determined whether this diffusion could be prevented using a sodium alginate (Alg-Na) hydrogel. We observed that the use of a 1.75% Alg-Na solution could significantly prevent the diffusion of carbon particles into the tissues of mice after subcutaneously injecting them with India ink. Similar results were observed in resected porcine large intestines. A good correlation between the concentration of Alg-Na and tattooed area was observed, in which an increase in its concentration led to an increase in its viscosity and injection pressure. To examine the effect of the molecular weight of Alg-Na on the tattooing area, a solution of 2% Alg-Na was irradiated with an electron beam at varying electron doses. Since irradiation could reduce the molecular weight, viscosity, and injection pressure of Alg-Na, a good correlation between these parameters and the tattooed area was observed. We concluded that an adequately viscous Alg-Na hydrogel could be used for clear preoperative marking.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Inomata M, Shiroshita H, Uchida H, Bandoh T, Akira S, Yamaguchi S, et al. Current status of endoscopic surgery in Japan: the 14th National Survey of Endoscopic Surgery by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020;13:7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wells KO, Senagore A. Minimally invasive colon cancer surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2019;28:285–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jia FY, Ke C, Yu P, Hendi M, He PZ, Song ML, et al. Minimally invasive gastric cancer surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2019;28:201–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee SI, Choi YS, Park DJ, Kim HH, Yang HK, Kim MC. Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:874–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kitano S, Shiraishi N. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric tumors. Surg Clin N Am. 2005;85:151–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang SB, Park JS, Kim DW, Lee TG. Intraoperative technical difficulty during laparoscopy-assisted surgery as a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1400–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arteaga GI, Martín MA, Fernández EM, Arranz DJ, Parra BA, Nicolas PD, et al. The use of preoperative endoscopic tattooing in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery for endoscopically advanced tumors: a prospective comparative clinical study. World J Surg. 2006;30:605–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsui H, Okamoto Y, Nabeshima K, Kondoh Y, Ogoshi K, Makuuchi H. Endoscopy-assisted gastric resection: a safe and reliable procedure for tumor clearance during laparoscopic high distal or proximal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1146–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu KI, Fujii T, Kato S, Sano Y, Koba I, Mera K, et al. A new endoscopic tattooing technique for identifying the location of colonic lesions during laparoscopic surgery: a comparison with the conventional technique. Endoscopy. 2001;33:687–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Park JW, Sohn DK, Hong CW, Han KS, Choi DH, Chang HJ, et al. The usefulness of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing using a saline test injection method with prepackaged sterile India ink for localization in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:501–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma J, Lin Y, Chen X, Zhao B, Zhang J. Flow behavior, thixotropy and dynamical viscoelasticity of sodium alginate aqueous solutions. Food Hydrocoll. 2014;38:119–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Poormand H, Leili M, Khazaei M. Adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solutions using water treatment sludge modified with sodium alginate as a low cost adsorbent. Water Sci Technol. 2017;75:281–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tam SK, Dusseault J, Bilodeau S, Langlois G, Hallé JP, Yahia L. Factors influencing alginate gel biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;98:40–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frumovitz M, Euscher ED, Deavers MT, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT, et al. “Triple injection” lymphatic mapping technique to determine if parametrial nodes are the true sentinel lymph nodes in women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;27:467–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kusano T, Etoh T, Akagi T, Ueda Y, Shiroshita H, Yasuda K, et al. Evaluation of 0.6% sodium alginate as a submucosal injection material in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:638–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eun SH, Cho JY, Jung IS, Ko BM, Hong SJ, Ryu CB, et al. Effectiveness of sodium alginate as a submucosal injection material for endoscopic mucosal resection in animal. Gut Liver. 2007;1:27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagasawa N, Mitomo H, Yoshii F, Kume T. Radiation-induced degradation of sodium alginate. Polym Degrad Stab. 2000;69:279–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Daoud DC, Suter N, Durand M, Bouin M, Faulques B, Renteln D. Efficacy and safety of 0.4 percent sodium hyaluronate for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:3069–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere thanks to Prof. Hideki Sakai and Dr. Kenichi Sakai (Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Tokyo University of Science, Chiba, Japan) for their assistance in measuring the viscosity and viscoelasticity. This work was supported in part by a GAP FUND Project (4th period in 2018) from Kyoto University and a grant from Takeda Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Makiya Nishikawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seino, N., Omori, E., Kusamori, K. et al. Application of a sodium alginate hydrogel for clear preoperative endoscopic marking using India ink. Polym J 52, 977–983 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-020-0342-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-020-0342-9

Search

Quick links