Introduction

Wearable and stretchable electronics for human or robot bodies are becoming increasingly popular for their potential uses in healthcare monitoring, artificial robots, eye cameras, and electronic skin1,2,3,4,5,6. The weakest parts in wearable and stretchable electronics are the stretchable conductors because typical metal or inorganic electrodes are easily cracked by external stretching7,8. Therefore, wearable electronics require highly conductive, stretchable electrode materials, which can be prepared via simple, scalable physical vapor deposition as part of a typical device fabrication process. Until now, most wearable and stretchable electronics for skin or the human body have been fabricated on elastomeric substrates such as polyurethane (PU), styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), Ecoflex, and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), which have high stretchability9,10,11,12. Compared to the stretchability of the substrate, metal or transparent conducting oxide (TCO) electrodes showed poor stretchability resulting from the small strain failure values of the metal or TCO materials. To overcome the low stretchability of of metal or TCO electrodes, several hybrid electrodes consisting of two kinds of electrode materials, such as graphene, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), reduced graphene oxide nanosheets, conductive polymers, nanoparticles, and nanowires, have been reported as stretchable electrodes13,14,15,16,17,18,19. Zhow et al.20 reported on a stretchable CNT-polyacrylic acid hybrid electrode with a sheet resistance of 60 Ω/square for use as electrodes in wearable electronic devices and bioelectronics and stretching of 40% strain. Fan et al.21 also reported on a high-performance Ag NW-PEDOT:PSS hybrid electrode embedded in an elastomer with a gauge factor (GF) of 6.5–8.0. Although there have been many reports on hybrid stretchable electrodes that can enhance the performance of wearable electronics, most of those previous reports have been achieved using complicated, expensive, small-area procedures, including a complicated transfer solution and additional processing (plasmonic welding, multistep processes)22,23,24,25. For the mass production of wearable electronics, a large-area coating process is needed to fabricate stretchable electrodes compatible with current thin-film processes, such as sputtering or evaporation. Although solution-based printing technologies have been applied in large-area coating processes, vacuum-based sputtering or roll-to-roll sputtering is still suitable for preparing large-area flexible electrodes due to its uniformity and reproducibility. Since most components in stretchable electronics are compatible with current semiconductor-based devices, the fabrication process is also compatible with a current semiconductor fabrication process. In particular, the large-area coating and fabrication of wearable and stretchable electronics should employ typical magnetron sputtering-based coatings. Although some stretchable electrodes with typical 2- or 3-dimensional structures have been fabricated by conventional sputtering or evaporation, a detailed investigation of stretchable electrodes fabricated by the cosputtering process for stretchable sensors or electrodes is still needed.

In this work, we demonstrate semitransparent and highly stretchable Ag-PTFE composite conductors for stretchable interconnectors, touch panels, and sensors. High-performance stretchable conductors are fabricated by employing typical direct current (DC) and radio frequency (RF) magnetron cosputtering, which is appropriate for current nano and microelectronic fabrication. In the hybrid structure, the Ag acts as a conductive percolation path, and the PTFE matrix serves to control the agglomeration of Ag and to improve the mechanical stretchability of the hybrid conductors. The optical, electrical, morphological, and mechanical properties of the PTFE-modified Ag hybrid conductor were investigated as a function of the ratio of RF and DC power simultaneously applied to the polymer PTFE and metal Ag targets. To show the feasibility of using the Ag-PTFE conductor as interconnectors, commercial electroluminescence (EL) and light-emitting diodes (LEDs) were connected to the Ag-PTFE conductors, showing operation under stretched conditions. In addition, the stretchable Ag-PTFE conductors were employed in strain sensors, capacitive touch panels, and electromyography (EMG) sensors. The successful operation of the strain sensor, touch panels, and EMG under stretching conditions indicated that the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor fabricated by cosputtering is a promising stretchable conductor that can replace current hybrid stretchable conductors fabricated by expensive and complicated fabrication processes that are not suitable for large-area device fabrication.

Experimental procedures

Preparation of PTFE-modified Ag hybrid conductors on a PU substrate

The PTFE-modified Ag hybrid conductor was sputtered onto a 140 µm PU substrate using a magnetron sputtering system at a low temperature (30–45 °C, Fig. S1, Supplementary Information). The PTFE:CNT (JAEWOO) and Ag (99.99%, Dasom RMS) targets were attached to tiled cathode guns and cosputtered using an RF and DC power source. PTFE powder (A7-J, DuPont Mitsui) and multiwall CNT powder (HANOS CM-280, Hanwha Chemical) were premixed with PTFE: CNT weight ratios of 95:5. The Ag and PTFE films were cosputtered with a base pressure of <3 × 10−6 Torr, working pressure of 4 mTorr, and an Ar flow rate of 20 sccm. The deposition thickness was 20 nm, which was confirmed with a surface profiler (NanoMap LS, AEP Technology).

Analysis of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductors

The optical and electrical properties of the Ag-PTFE conductor were investigated using a UV-visible spectrometer (V-670, Jasco) and a Hall measurement (HMS-4500AM, Ecopia). The electrical resistivity of the optimized Ag-PTFE conductor was measured using a physical property measurement system (Quantum Design) in the temperature range from 2 to 300 K to confirm the conduction mechanism. A contact angle analyzer (Phoenix-MT (A), SEO CO.) was used to calculate the surface energy of the Ag-PTFE film. Three milliliters of deionized water and diiodomethane served as the polar and dispersed components, and the surface energy was calculated. The surface morphology and microstructure of the Ag-PTFE conductors were investigated using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM: JSM-7600F, JEOL) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM: JEM-2100F, JEOL). The mechanical properties of the Ag-PTFE films were analyzed using our lab-designed stretching and inner/outer bending test system. To confirm the mechanical stability, we performed the dynamic fatigue stretching test at 20% strain and the dynamic fatigue bending test at a bending radius of 1 mm for 1000 cycles.

Fabrication of the stretchable strain sensor and EL/LED interconnector

Optimized stretchable Ag-PTFE conductors were fabricated with DC:RF (5:40 W) conditions on a PU substrate with an area of 1.5 × 5 cm2. The operation of the strain sensor attached to the wrist of the human body was monitored by using a digital multimeter (DMM: 34470 A, Keysight). When stress was applied to the strain sensor, the resistance of the Ag-PTFE conductors changed due to the elongation of the Ag-PTFE conductors. These changes in resistance could detect the deformation applied to the sensor. In addition, to verify the stability, repeated strain sensing was performed 100 times between 10% strain and 20% strain by connecting the DMM and a lab-designed stretching test system. To confirm the application as stretchable interconnectors, the Ag-PTFE conductor was connected to an electroluminescent (EL: National EL technology) and a LED.

Fabrication of a stretchable touch sensor

The size of the touch screen sensor was set to 5 × 3 cm2. We used a metal mask to deposit the patterned Ag-PTFE film as a bottom electrode on the PU substrate for the touch sensor. After depositing the bottom electrode on the PU substrate, the contact area was covered with PI tape and spin-coated with PU. The dielectric layer of the touch sensor was formed by spin coating PU (Alberdingk U3251, Alberdingk Boley) dispersed in water. The PU dispersion was spin-coated on the bottom electrode at 2000 rpm for 60 s and dried at 60 °C for 4 h. The top electrode on the PU was coated at 2000 rpm for 15 s using PDMS as encapsulation. To minimize contact damage to the touch sensor when sensing capacitance, Au textiles were used as electrodes. The capacitance measurement to detect touch used an AC pulse (with an amplitude of −5 to 5 V and a frequency of 10 Hz) to the top Ag-PTFE conductor to induce a dipole alignment inside the PU dielectric layer using a Semiconductor Device Analyzer (B1500A, Keysight).

Measurement of the EMG sensor

Solution-based polyimide (PI) (CAS # 872-50-4) was purchased from HD-MicroSystems and used as received. First, solution-based PI was spin-coated on a 4 × 4 cm2 precleaned silicon substrate at 2000 rpm for 30 s as a supporting layer for the sensor. After that, the substrates were soft baked at 90 °C for 5 min and then cured at 350 °C for 1 h on a hot plate. The Ag-PTFE conductor was deposited on the substrates with DC 5 W:RF 40 W conditions by cosputtering. Next, the Ag-PTFE layer and PI substrate were completely ablated along with the thickness by using a programmable bench-top infrared (IR) laser machine to obtain the desired pattern. Then, the patterned sensor was self-detached from the silicon substrate just by dipping in hot water maintained at 90 °C, and it was later transferred onto the glass substrate while floating on water. Thereafter, anisotropic conductive film bonding was conducted between the patterned sensor and the flexible conductive wire, helping the sensor to draw signals without any noise during EMG monitoring. Finally, a sticky and stretchable PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane)/PEIE (polyethyleneimine 80% ethoxylated solution) patch (1-mm thick) was attached on top of the sensor. Herein, the PDMS-PEIE patch was prepared by mixing 10 g of PDMS base agent to 1 g of PDMS curing agent with 40 μl of PEIE added to it, and then the mixture was degassed and cured at 90 °C for 4 h. The EMG measurements were performed by using an MP36 (Biopac System, Inc., USA).

Results and discussion

The semitransparent and highly stretchable Ag-PTFE conductors were prepared by the magnetron cosputtering of 3-inch Ag metal and PTFE polymer targets on a 140-μm-thick commercial PU substrate at room temperature (Fig. 1a). In particular, to sputter the insulating PTFE target, we employed a specially designed PTFE:CNT mixed target (PTFE: CNT weight ratio 95:5)26. Most stretchable conductors are currently fabricated on thick PDMS substrates, but such a PDMS substrate requires a complicated preparation procedure27. We were able to fabricate our conductors easily and quickly using commercially available transparent PU substrates. During cosputtering of the metal (Ag) and PTFE (polymer) targets, sputtered Ag atoms and C-F chains were randomly deposited on the PU substrate and formed a randomly connected Ag path in the PTFE matrix, as shown in Fig. 1b. Because of the low Young’s modulus of the PTFE matrix and good stretchability of the Ag network structure, the PTFE-Ag hybrid was stretchable. Those randomly connected Ag networks embedded in the PTFE matrix maintained their conducting path, even under stretching, due to the high stretchability of the PTFE matrix. Since the Ag-PTFE conductor shows unique electrical and mechanical properties depending on the ratio of DC to RF power applied on the Ag and PTFE targets, we optimized the Ag-PTFE conductor based on the DC/RF power ratio. The optimized Ag-PTFE conductors could be applied in wearable and stretchable sensors, such as wearable strain sensors, wearable touch screen panels, and wearable EMG sensors, as shown in Fig. 1c. To apply Ag-PTFE conductors in wearable and self-cleaning sensors, an incomplete wetting surface is important for the hybrid electrode. Therefore, the contact angle and surface energy of the Ag-PTFE conductors were measured as a function of the DC and RF power applied to Ag and PTFE targets.

Fig. 1: Fabrication and applications of Ag-PTFE hybrid conductors.
figure 1

a Schematics of Ag and PTFE cosputtering to fabricate stretchable hybrid electrodes. b Surface FESEM image of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor before and after stretching. c Promising applications of the stretchable and semitransparent Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor in strain sensors, wearable touch sensors, and EMG sensors.

Figure 2a shows a picture of the contact angle as a function of the DC and RF power ratio. An increase in the RF power applied to the PTFE target leads to an increase in the contact angle of the hybrid electrodes due to the increase in the PTFE portion with hydrophobic properties. The droplet shape on the Ag-PTFE conductor indicates the formation of an incomplete wetting surface on the hybrid electrodes. Figure 2b shows the surface energy of the Ag-PTFE conductor as a function of the DC/RF power ratio. The surface energy was calculated using the contact angle measurement (Phoenix-MT(A), SEO CO.) as a function of the DC/RF power ratio. The contact angle of the surface could be expressed using Young’s equation as follows28.

$$\cos \theta = (\gamma _F - \gamma _{\mathrm{FL}})/\gamma _L$$
(1)

where γF is the interfacial free energy of the film-vapor interface, γFL is the interfacial free energy of the film-liquid interface, and γL is the interfacial free energy of the liquid-vapor interface. The surface energy was calculated using the Owens, Wendt, Rabel, and Kaelble (OWRK) methods. The contact angle was measured at five or more random points, and the average value is indicated. By measuring the contact angle using two solutions with known surface energy components, it is possible to separate the dispersion component of the surface energy from the polar component. In this work, a polar solution (deionized water) and a dispersion solution (diiodomethane) were used for the calculations. According to the Fowkes approximation below, the surface energy of each component was calculated29.

$$\gamma _F = \gamma _F^d + \gamma _F^p$$
(2)
Fig. 2: Images of the Ag-PTFE conductor and surface energy as a function of DC and RF power applied in the Ag and PTFE targets.
figure 2

a Photograph showing the contact angle as a function of the DC/RF power ratio. b Surface energy of the Ag-PTFE conductor as a function of the DC/RF power ratio. c The photograph illustrates a water droplet on the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor prepared at a DC/RF power of 5/40 W. d FESEM images of Ag-PTFE hybrid conductors as a function of DC/RF power ratio.

In the above equation, d and p represent the dispersive force and hydrogen bonding components, respectively. The surface energy (γF) of the Ag-PTFE conductor can explain the sum that was calculated using Eq. (2). As shown in Fig. 2b, an increase in the RF power of PTFE resulted in a significant decrease in the surface energy, while the DC power increase led to a small decrease in the surface energy. Table 1 shows the surface energy of the Ag-PTFE conductor as a function of the DC/RF power ratio. This is because the strong interactions between C and F of PTFE form an incomplete wetting surface on the manufactured sample, as shown in Fig. 2c. Although the Ag-PTFE hybrid electrode showed a smaller contact angle (64.53°) than that (106.69°) of the bare PTFE film (Fig. S2a), the high contact angle of the Ag-PTFE hybrid electrode is enough to use the product as a self-cleaning electrode for wearable electronics. The water drops on the surface of the Ag-PTFE hybrid electrode could maintain a clean surface since the water drops were repelled from the surface of the Ag-PTFE-based wearable device, as shown in Fig. S2b and video (Supporting information) showing the self-cleaning surface of the Ag-PTFE hybrid electrode. The surface morphology and agglomeration of Ag in the hybrid conductor were critically dependent on the DC/RF power ratio, as shown in Fig. 2d. As expected from the contact angle, the increase in the RF power for PTFE led to a self-agglomerated Ag network due to the hydrophobic surface of the PTFE matrix. Compared to the Ag-PTFE conductor prepared at a DC/RF ratio of 3/10 W, the Ag-PTFE conductor prepared at a DC/RF power of 3/40 W showed a more agglomerated Ag network, which is beneficial for stretching. Table 2 shows the sheet resistance and conductivity of the Ag-PTFE conductor according to the DC/RF power ratios as well as the 20 nm thick pure Ag film. As summarized in Table 2, the sputtered pure Ag film showed much higher conductivity than the Ag-PTFE hybrid films. The sheet resistance of the 20-nm thick pure Ag film is 2.53 Ω/square, and the conductivity is 197,460 S/cm (inverse of resistivity). In contrast to the contact angle, the sheet resistance of the Ag-PTFE conductors is significantly dependent on the DC power for Ag sputtering. With an increase in the DC power at the same RF power of the PTFE, the Ag-PTFE conductor showed a decreased sheet resistance due to the higher Ag volume fraction and better current path in the Ag network. However, as expected from Fig. 2d, the sheet resistance of the Ag-PTFE conductor prepared at a DC/RF power ratio of 3/40 W was not measured because Ag failed to form the network, and there was no current path. The severely agglomerated Ag atoms, like isolated islands, are disconnected and cannot provide a current path. However, the Ag-PTEF hybrid conductor prepared at a higher DC power (5/40, 7/40 W) with an increased Ag volume fraction showed sheet resistances of 3.09 and 17.23 Ω/square, which indicated an effective Ag network current path in the PTFT matrix. Therefore, to fabricate high-performance stretchable Ag-PTFE conductors, achieving control over the DC/RF power ratio is a very important parameter in forming the Ag network in the PTFE matrix. We investigated the conduction mechanism of the Ag-PTFE conductor by measuring the change in resistance with a decrease in temperature (Fig. S3, Supplementary Information). The temperature coefficient of the resistivity measured from the Ag-PTFE conductor was found to be positive from 3 to 300 K, indicating that the Ag-PTFE conductor possessed typical metallic characteristics due to the presence of the Ag network.

Table 1 Surface energy of the Ag-PTFE films with increasing sputter power.
Table 2 Sheet resistance and conductivity of the Ag-PTFE hybrid films with increasing DC/RF power.

The microstructure of the Ag-PTFE conductor was analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Bright-field (BF) TEM images of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor (DC/RF power ratio of 5/40 W) are shown in Fig. 3a, b for cross-sectional analysis. As shown in the SEM image of Fig. 2d, Ag atoms agglomerate in the PTFE matrix. In the BF TEM image of Fig. 3a, the self-assembled Ag atoms show different contrast due to junction or overlapping regions, as indicated by the arrow. Self-agglomerated Ag networks are well interconnected and form a conduction path embedded in an amorphous PTFE matrix. The enlarged cross-sections of the Ag-PTFE electrodes of Fig. 3b, c show that crystalline Ag is embedded in the amorphous PTFE matrix. Figure 3b shows magnified high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of the Ag network on the PU substrate. The agglomerated Ag showed a crystalline structure, which was confirmed by the fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern at a corner. Figure 3c also shows a magnified PTFE portion in the hybrid electrode. This showed that an amorphous PTFE matrix with a disarranged lattice existed around the crystalline Ag network.

Fig. 3: Microstructure of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor on the PU substrate.
figure 3

a Cross-sectional TEM image of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor. b Magnified TEM image of the crystalline Ag network overlapping on the amorphous PTFE matrix with a fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern of the Ag network. c Enlarged cross-sectional image of the Ag network embedded-PTFE matrix.

Figure 4a shows the optical transmittance of the Ag-PTFE conductor in the visible wavelength region as a function of the DC/RF power ratio. Despite the existence of oblique Ag, the Ag-PTFE conductor showed semitransparent optical properties in the visible wavelength region due to the self-assembled network structure of the sputtered Ag. It was clearly shown that the optical transmittance of the Ag-PTFE electrode is mainly affected by the DC power applied to the Ag target because the PTFE matrix has very high optical transmittance, as shown in Fig. 4a. All Ag-PTFE films are semitransparent with optical transmittances of 25.27–38.49% at a transmittance wavelength of 550 nm. Figure 4b compares the optical transmittance of the Ag-PTFE electrodes according to the DC/RF power ratio. Due to the similar optical transmittance, it is difficult to distinguish the samples with the naked eye. Through the semitransparent Ag-PTFE conductors, we can observe the SKKU logo. Figure 4c is a photograph of the optimized Ag-PTFE conductor grown at a DC/RF ratio of 5/40 W in natural light. We also carried out continuous cycling stretching from 0 to 40% and measured the transmittance change, as shown in Fig. S4 and Table S1 (Supplementary Information). Even after 40% stretching, the Ag-PTFE electrode showed a constant optical transmittance change (ΔT), indicating good optical stability of the Ag-PTFE electrodes.

Fig. 4: Optical properties of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor on a PU substrate.
figure 4

a Optical transmittance of the Ag-PTFE conductor in the visible wavelength region with increasing sputtered DC (Ag target) and RF (PTFE target) power. b The images show the color and transparency of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor under each sputtered condition. c Photographs showing the semitransparent Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor on a PU substrate in natural light.

In general, a PU is a well-known elastomer with very weak intermolecular bonds, high viscosity, and low elastic coefficients. Due to these characteristics, transparent PU is an excellent stretchable substrate material and has been widely employed in wearable and stretchable devices30,31. We also used commercial transparent PU as a stretchable substrate instead of typical PDMS fabricated through a complicated transfer process. The mechanical properties of the Ag-PTFE film sputtered on the stretchable PU substrate were investigated, as shown in Fig. 5. The change in the resistance of the Ag-PTFE electrode on the PU can be expressed as ΔR = RR0, where R is the resistance measured in situ under stretching and R0 is the resistance measured initially. In the stretching test, one clamp holding a 2 × 3 cm2 sized sample was fixed, and the other clamp was moved laterally to produce a strain from 0 to 40% (Fig. 5a). Figure 5b shows the measured change in resistance of all sputtered Ag-PTFE conductors except the insulating sample grown at a DC/RF power ratio of 3/40 W with increasing strain. Among the Ag-PTFE samples, hybrid conductors with a large Ag volume fraction (5/10 W, 7/10 W, and 7/20 W) showed a significant increase in resistance within a strain of 10%, indicating severe crack formation or delamination of the Ag-rich conductors. However, the Ag-PTFE conductor with a large volume fraction of PTFE prepared at DC/RF power ratios of 5/40 W and 7/40 W showed a minimal change in resistance even at a strain of 20%. The amorphous PTFE matrix with good stretchability could uniformly dispatch the external force when the PU substrate was stretched. Figure 5c compares the hysteresis of the change in resistance of the Ag-PTFE films prepared at DC/RF power ratios of 5/40 W and 7/40 W during stretching and releasing. Within a strain of 40%, both samples showed similar stretchability and hysteresis during the increase and decrease in strain. A similar change in resistance in the hysteresis confirmed that the Ag-PTFE conductor with the high PTFE volume fraction could be applied to wearable devices. Figure 5d shows a dynamic fatigue test for the best and worst samples prepared at DC/RF power ratios of 7/10 W and 5/40 W with increasing numbers of 20% stretching cycles. The Ag-PTFE conductor prepared at a DC/RF ratio of 5/40 W showed a small change in resistance, even after 1000 stretching cycles. However, the sample prepared at a DC/RF power of 7/10 W showed a rapid change in resistance within 4 cycles during a repeated 20% stretching test. Figure 5e shows a surface FESEM image of the Ag-PTFE samples prepared at DC/RF power ratios of 7/10 W and 5/40 W after 1000 cycles of stretching. As expected from Fig. 5d, the Ag-PTFE conductor prepared at a DC/RF power ratio of 7/10 W showed severe cracks, as indicated by the dashed circles. Due to a high Ag volume fraction, the Ag-PTFE sample showed the easy formation of a crack, which is closely related to the increased resistance. Since the crack resulted in a physically separated Ag-PTFE conductor, however, the resistance of the conductor abruptly increased, even at 20% stretching. However, the Ag-PTFE sample prepared at a DC/RF power ratio of 5/40 W maintained the Ag network embedded in the PTFE matrix without cracks on the surface after 1000 cycles of 20% stretching. Figure 6a shows the results of the outer and inner bending tests of the optimized sample prepared at a DC/RF power of 5/40 W with a decreasing bending radius. The outer and inner bending tests for the other samples are shown in Fig. S5 (Supplementary Information). As illustrated in the inset, the bending of the sample was performed by a horizontal motion of the clamp holding the samples. The horizontal movement of the clamp led to a decrease in the bending radius, with in situ measurements of the resistance of the electrode. The sample was bent outward when the Ag-PTFE film was clamped facing upward and bent inward when the sample was facing down. The outer bending sample experienced tensile stress, while the inner bending sample film experienced compressive stress. Regardless of the inner and outer bending modes, the Ag-PTFE conductor exhibited a constant resistance change as the bending radius decreased from 10 to 1 mm (Fig. 6a). This means that the Ag conduction pathway in the PTFE matrix is well connected under tensile/compressive stress by inward/outward bending. These results indicated that the Ag-PTFE film can be easily applied in stretchable and wearable devices. Both the dynamic outer and inner bending tests in Fig. 6b showed constant resistance during 1000 repeated cycles. The small bending radius and outstanding flexibility of the Ag-PTFE electrode demonstrate its potential for application in wearable and stretchable devices.

Fig. 5: Stretchability of the sputtered Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor.
figure 5

a The pictures show the stretching steps of the Ag-PTFE film up to a strain of 40% in a lab-made stretching system. b Change in resistance of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor as a function of the strain prepared at different DC/RF power ratios. c Hysteresis of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor prepared at different DC/RF ratios (5/40 W and 7/40 W). d Dynamic fatigue test of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor with the worst and best stretchability at a strain of 20%. e Surface FESEM images of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor after 1000 cycles of repeated stretching in (d).

Fig. 6: Mechanical properties of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor.
figure 6

a The outward and inward bending test results for the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor with decreasing outward (upper panel) and inward (bottom panel) bending radii. The inset demonstrates the outward and inward bending of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductors. b Dynamic outward/inward bending fatigue test of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor at a fixed bending radius of 1 mm for 1000 repeat cycles.

To demonstrate the potential of the sputtered Ag-PTFE conductors, we fabricated and tested a semitransparent, wearable and stretchable strain sensor, an interconnector, a touch screen sensor, and an EMG sensor. We showed the practicability of using the Ag-PTFE conductor for stretchable and wearable strain sensors. The stretchable and wearable strain sensor requires relatively high sensitivity and is one of the simplest and most efficient forms for reading applied strain based on the change in electrical resistance of the conductor32. In addition to the high stretchability and sensitivity, the long-term performance stability of these stretchable sensors is also critical for practical applications. The response in the resistance of the stretchable strain sensor fabricated using the Ag-PTFE conductor is shown in Fig. 7a, b. As shown in Fig. 7a, the Ag-PTFE-based strain sensor showed a stable sensing performance under repeated stretching/release for 100 cycles at strains of 10% and 20%. Generally, the GF of the strain sensor is the ratio of the relative change in resistance to the strain. Therefore, GF represents the sensitivity of the strain sensor as a measure of the change in resistance according to the strain33.

$${\mathrm{GF}} = \frac{{{\Delta} R/R_0}}{\varepsilon } = \frac{{R - R_0}}{{R_0 \times \varepsilon }}$$
(2)

where ε is the strain applied to the sensor, R0 is the initial resistance, and R is the final resistance at a strain of ε. Figure 7b shows the curve of the relative change in resistance ∆R/R0 versus time under 10 and 20% strain during 100 cycles of stretching tests. The GF values of the Ag-PTFE conductor-based strain sensors are 5.09 and 7.08 for 10% and 20% strain, respectively. As a result, the Ag-PTFE conductor-based strain sensor responds to strain with high sensitivity and acceptable linearity. With their high stretchability and sensitivity, Ag-PTFE strain sensors can be used successfully to monitor a wide range of human motion. A stretchable strain sensor attached to the wrist could accurately track repeated movements during bending, as shown in Fig. 7c. The resistance of the stretchable and wearable strain sensors increase sharply during bending of the wrist since bending at a larger angle generally causes greater strain. The strain sensor is sensitive enough to distinguish the degree of wrist bending, as shown in the upper panels. The sputtered Ag-PTFE conductor could be applied in stretchable interconnectors. The pictures in Fig. 7d show the Ag-PTFE conductor applied as an interconnector for commercial EL devices. Two sides of the blue EL device with the SKKU logo were attached by the Ag-PTFE conductor. AC power was applied to turn on the EL device through the stretchable Ag-PFTE conductor. The Ag-PTFE hybrid electrode shows continuous lighting even at 20% stretching, as shown in Fig. 7d. The blue EL device is continuously lit even after 20% stretching due to the outstanding stretchability of the Ag-PTFE conductor. This indicated that the hybrid electrode has high conductivity even after 20% stretching. Because the resistance of the interconnector connected to the EL is proportional to its length and inversely proportional to its cross-sectional area, the blue EL showed slightly decreased light intensity above 20% stretching. The Ag-PTFE conductor was also applied as a flexible and stretchable interconnector for the white LEDs, as shown in Fig. 7e. The LED connected with the Ag-PTFE interconnectors remained lit even after bending (bending radius of 5 mm) and stretching of 20%. The continuous lighting of the white LEDs connected to the stretched Ag-PTFE interconnector demonstrates promise as a stretchable interconnect for stretchable and wearable sensors.

Fig. 7: Application prospects of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductors.
figure 7

a Change in resistance in 10% and 20% stretched Ag-PTFE hybrid conductors for 100 cycles for a stretchable strain sensor. b Scale-out graph of the change in resistance with each strain in the stretching test. c Graph of sensitivities according to the wrist movement of the photograph by attaching an Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor on the wrist. d Comparison of the brightness before and after stretching (20%) of the Ag-PTPE interconnector connected on commercial EL devices. e Ag-PTFE interconnectors connected to commercial white LEDs. During the bending and stretching of the Ag-PTFE interconnectors, the white LED showed bright white light, indicating the outstanding flexibility and stretchability of the sputtered Ag-PTFE conductor.

To demonstrate the applicability of the developed Ag-PTFE conductor, we fabricated a capacitive-type stretchable touch sensor to measure the touch of a human, which was used as electronic skin and in a human monitoring system (Fig. S6)34,35. To use attachable touch panels on the human body, wearable touch sensors require good touch responsivity and high stretchability, similar to wearable strain sensors. Figure 8a shows the schematic structure of the touch sensor and multilayer for the touch panel. We used an Ag-PTFE conductor sputtered on the PU substrate as the bottom and top electrodes. The PU substrate was also used as a dielectric layer between the top and bottom Ag-PTFE conductors. Our touch sensor was used as a capacitive type where the signal comes from a change in the capacitance between the electrodes, as illustrated in Fig. 8b. As shown in Fig. 8c, since contact with the touch panels led to a change in the capacitance, the sensor was able to sense human touch. The measurements of the capacitance responses (ΔC/C0 = (CC0)/C0, where C0 is the initial capacitance and C is the change in the capacitance) for pristine and stretched states are shown in Fig. 8b. This touch sensor also exhibits stable sensing performance during stretching (ε = 20%) due to the outstanding stretchability of the Ag-PTFE conductor. The difference in capacitance change between the pristine state and the stretching state is caused by a decrease in the thickness of the dielectric layer of the touch sensor due to stretching. Therefore, it is possible to detect strain through the difference in capacitance change (C = εA/d, where ε is the permittivity of the dielectric, A is the area of the touch sensor, and d is the distance between the electrode in the touch sensor). To confirm that there was no change in the capacitance due to electrode fatigue, we compared the base capacitance and confirmed that there was no change in electrode performance (Fig. S7, Supplementary Information). The capacitance responsivity values (ΔC/C0) to touch stimuli applied on each sensor of the 3 × 3 arrays are illustrated in Fig. 8d. The results of the evaluation for each sensor in the array are shown in Fig. 8e. Most of the sensors in the array showed responsivity values close to −23.2%. We verified the suitability for use in stretchable and wearable touch sensors that can be worn, with touch detection even in the stretched state.

Fig. 8: Performance of stretchable touch sensor with Ag-PTFE hybrid conductors.
figure 8

a Schematics of a stretchable touch sensor using a patterned Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor. b Schematic illustration of a touch measurement with the five layers of the stretchable touch sensor labeled. c The pictures show the pristine and 20% stretched touch panel. The change in capacitance indicates a touch stimulation in the pristine state and 20% stretching state. d Patterns and photographs of touch sensors, 3 × 5 cm2. e Graph of the capacitance change between each touch array due to touch stimulation.

Furthermore, the Ag-PTFE conductor was applied to fabricate a stretchable EMG sensor. Figure 9a shows the fabrication process of the stretchable EMG sensor using the Ag-PTFE conductor. To enable stretchability in the sensor, nature-inspired strain-free mechanical structures were taken into account, as was reported recently36. This architecture with excellent sensing performance can be implemented with wearable smart sensors (Fig. 9b). Unlike conventional photolithography techniques that are time consuming, expensive, hazardous, and mask dependent, the laser provides the desired patterns inexpensively within fractions of a minute in a user-friendly manner with roll-to-roll processability37,38. Furthermore, patch-based sensors have drawn great attention to wearable electronics due to their breathable and long-term wearable forms39,40. In addition, the EMG sensor was confirmed to have been manufactured and used in various sensors. These structures provide mechanical flexibility and stretchability for the sensor, which can thereby. sustain a significant amount of deformation when subjected to complex stress environments. Figure 9b, c consists of a real image showing the position of the data obtained during the measurement of the proposed EMG sensor. Three sensors were placed on the forearm with the two (+ and −) electrodes attached on top of the flexor muscle, which generally exhibits good potential during hand clenching. Then, the EMG signals were measured by a bipolar method using a Biopac system. Another electrode was placed far from the other two sensors and used as a ground electrode. To acquire the desired signals, a bandpass filter was applied (low pass filter <500 Hz, high pass filter >35 Hz) with a data sampling rate of 2 kHz. Overall, the sensor showed amplitudes with an average of 0.6 mV with clear features when the forearm muscles were squeezed, with values that are generally comparable to those seen in previous reports (Fig. 9d).

Fig. 9: Schematic illustration of the EMG sensor fabrication process.
figure 9

a Spin coating solution-processed PI, deposition of Ag-PTFE conductor by sputtering, laser-processing of the Ag-PTFE/PI film into desired patterns, the immersion of the sensor in hot water (90 °C), ACF bonding followed by attachment of PDMS-PEIE substrate on top of the sensor design, and EMG sensor on stretchable PDMS-PEIE substrate. b Photograph of the EMG sensor. c Photograph of EMG sensors attached to the human body. d The positions and the obtained data during the measurement of the EMG sensor.

Conclusion

In summary, we have demonstrated semitransparent, stretchable, and wearable Ag-PTFE hybrid conductors for stretchable and wearable interconnectors and sensors. Stretchable and wearable Ag-PTFE hybrid conductors were fabricated by a simple and mature cosputtering process with variations in the DC/RF power ratio applied to the Ag and PTFE targets. The PTFE-modified Ag hybrid electrodes have a high stretchability of 0–40%, a low sheet resistance of 3.09–17.23 Ω/square, and a semitransmittance of 25.27–38.49%, which are suitable values for wearable, stretchable, and self-cleaning sensors. In addition, it was confirmed that the Ag-PTFE conductor forms an incomplete wetting surface according to the content of PTFE, which is suitable for self-cleaning devices. The current path formed by the Ag network embedded in the insulator PTFE matrix can be attributed to the low sheet resistance and high mechanical stretchability. In addition, the PTFE matrix improved the mechanical properties of the Ag-PTFE electrode at relatively high strains. Furthermore, we showed the elasticity of the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor to extreme mechanical strain, including stretching and inward/outward bending, to demonstrate the practicability of using Ag-PTFE hybrid conductors for stretchable electronics. Finally, we demonstrated the feasibility of using the Ag-PTFE hybrid conductor with a stretchable strain sensor, stretchable EL/LED interconnectors, stretchable touch sensor, and stretchable EMG sensor.