Correspondence | Open | Published:

Re-emergence of Lloviu virus in Miniopterus schreibersii bats, Hungary, 2016

Emerging Microbes & Infectionsvolume 7, Article number: 66 (2018) | Download Citation


Members of the virus family Filoviridae, such as ebola viruses and marburgviruses, cause hemorrhagic fevers associated with high mortality and are, therefore, of major public health importance worldwide1. The 2013–2016 West African Ebola virus (EBOV) disease outbreak further illustrated the epidemic potential and devastating effects associated with the members of Filoviridae. Bats have been identified as reservoirs for marburgviruses and are suspected to be involved in the transmission of ebola viruses to humans2,3. Since the discovery of Lloviu virus (LLOV) in Miniopterus schreibersii samples from Spain in 2002, European bats have also been considered as a possible host for filoviruses4. Subsequently, there have been no additional reports of LLOV detection or isolation, resulting in a paucity of knowledge on the biology and pathology of the virus. Moreover, no specific diagnostic test has been described, which further hampers surveillance studies5. Furthermore, the identification of genetically diverse filoviruses discovered in Chinese bat colonies has further highlighted the broad geographical distribution of filoviruses and their unexpected genetic diversity6,7.

In 2013, a mass-mortality incident occurred in a M. schreibersii bat colony, causing the death of ~500 individuals in Northeast Hungary (Bükk mountain). After investigating the scene, only aged carcasses could be collected, which prevented virological investigation. Blood coagulate was detected on the nose of several individuals, referring to possible respiratory hemorrhages. Other known bat colonies in the area were also checked and were found to be unaffected at that time. Three years later, in 2016, five Schreiber’s bat individuals were reported with the gross pathologic symptom of respiratory bleeding (Supplementary material) in Northeast Hungary ~50 km from the site of the 2013 incident. Interestingly, all five individuals were located close to the entrance of the mine cavern system. Seven other M. schreibersii bats were hibernating deeper in the mine and were separated from the sick individuals, which was the same location of the bats observed during annual winter counting (in the summer, the maternity colony generally consists of 5–6000 M. schreibersii individuals). The bats inside the mine cavern system were unaffected at the time of sampling and were frequently monitored during 2017. An additional mortality event was detected in December 2017 that affected 25 individuals roosting separately. Unfortunately, the decaying condition of the carcasses did not permit virological examination; thus, a connection to LLOV infection cannot be made. On the basis of a previous visit to the cave site in July, we hypothesize that this latest M. schreibersii mortality event occurred between July and December 2017.

Fresh carcasses from 2016 were collected and transported on dry ice to the biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) suit laboratory at the Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, for further examination. Briefly, after dissection, tissue samples were homogenized, and nucleic acid was extracted using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (QAIGEN) according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. Nested RT-PCR specific for the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene was used to identify filovirus RNA as described previously6. The RT-PCR amplicon was purified from agarose gel, and then bi-directionally sequenced on an ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer. On the basis of the preliminary sequence data for the Hungarian LLOV, a specific TaqMan probe-based real-time RT-PCR assay was designed (LLOV-Fw-scr: 5′-ACTGACATTGGAAAACCGAGG-3′; LLOV-Rev-scr: 5′-CCTCAATCCCTCCAAGATGTC-3′; LLOV-Prob-scr: 5′-FAM-CTGTATGAACTTGGACCCTCGGGC-ZEN-3′). The One-Step RT-PCR (QIAGEN) conditions were as follows: 50 °C for 30 min, 95 °C for 15 min followed by 50 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 51 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published LLOV-specific diagnostic assay used on wildlife samples. To further support the presence of LLOV in our samples, we designed two additional nested primer sets specific to the nucleoprotein gene. The nucleoprotein-specific oligonucleotide sequences and nested RT-PCR reaction conditions are summarized in the Supplementary material. No positive control was available in our laboratory during the experiments, excluding any false positive PCR results from nucleic-acid contamination.

Filovirus RNA was detected in one of the five lung samples tested by RT-PCR; that sample was the most well preserved. It is likely that the poor condition of bat carcasses and related degradation of viral nucleic acids explains the lack of signal in the other four lung samples examined. Since the causality between the known mortality events of bats and LLOV infection has not been shown, any other cause of death is also possible. A Basic Local Alignment Tool (BLAST) search ( and further phylogenetic analyses showed that the Hungarian virus (LLOV/Mad/2016/Hungary; accession number: MF996369) was most closely related to LLOV isolate MS-Liver-86/2003 (JF828358) with 98% nucleic acid homology (Fig. 1). This partial RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase sequence does not allow us to draw concrete conclusions regarding the evolution of LLOV in the past several years. The partial sequence does indicate the presence or re-emergence of a closely related variant to the Spanish LLOV in Hungary after more than a decade. As a result of nucleoprotein-specific nested RT-PCR reactions, we were able to amplify two additional fragments of the genome representing partial sequences of 747 and 326 nucleotides from the nucleoprotein gene (Accession numbers: MG888042 and MG888043). These fragments were almost identical to LLOV isolate MS-Liver-86/2003 from Spain with 99% nucleotide homology. Phylogenetic analysis on the 747-bp gene fragment further supported the close genetic and evolutionary relationship of the Hungarian and Spanish LLOV isolates (Fig. 2). Using our real-time RT-PCR approach, we investigated the tissue tropism of the virus by testing similar amounts of tissue from several organs derived from the LLOV positive individual. Lung and spleen samples were positive with similar Ct values (35.56 and 35.30, respectively), whereas the liver, kidney, brain and a tick removed from the carcass were negative for LLOV-specific nucleic acids. The exact tissue tropism of the virus is not totally clear, despite the similarly between our results and other studies that primarily detected LLOV and diverse filovirus RNA in lung samples from Spain and China, respectively4,7. Interestingly, no gross pathology of respiratory bleeding was reported prior to our study, although symptoms consistent with viral pneumonia were described in the Spanish samples4.

Virus isolation was carried out under BSL-4 suit laboratory conditions using an African green monkey kidney cell line (Vero E6; ATCC® CRL-1586). Briefly, Vero E6 cells were prepared on a 24-well cell culture plate using Eagle’s minimum essential medium (MEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics (streptomycin and ampicillin) as a growth medium. Plates with 80–90% confluent cell monolayers were washed with phosphate buffered saline, and then 200 μL from all examined tissues (brain, lung, liver, kidney and spleen) homogenized in phosphate buffered saline solution was added. The inoculated plates were incubated at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator. Ten days post infection, freeze/thaw cycles were performed three times, and then additional blind passages were conducted two more times. No cytopathic effect was visible on the first inoculation or on additional blind passages. Specific viral RNA was not detected from any of the infected cell media. Interestingly, there was no indication of in vitro isolation procedures for LLOV in the literature4. In vitro experiments of LLOV from positive Spanish samples were discussed by Burk et al.5 but unfortunately, all sample materials connected with the Spanish mortality events were depleted, prohibiting further experimentation or analysis. Moreover, similar to our results, studies in China reported in vitro isolation procedures in Vero E6 cell culture without successful isolation of any detected viruses6,7.

Although the human pathogenic potential of the virus is still unknown, the innate immune inhibitory function of LLOV-derived VP35 and VP24 proteins in human and bat cells has been reported8. Moreover, other studies involving recombinant LLOV proteins reported EBOV reminiscent receptor usage9,10. To assess the potential role of the virus in human or primate infections, further biological, molecular and in vitro investigations are needed.

More than a decade after the mass mortality of M. schreibersii bats in Spain (Cueva del Lloviu), LLOV has re-emerged in Europe, and we report its presence within the same bat species in Hungary. This incidence raises the question of whether it was a second introduction of LLOV in Europe or an unnoticed silent circulation proceeding among European bats. Our finding indicates a significant range expansion of the virus from the Iberian Peninsula of Spain, its currently only known geographic range. Due to the possible connection between LLOV infection and the mortality of M. schreibersii, it seems that this species is not the reservoir animal of LLOV. To clarify the exact source (i.e., other bat species, insects or additional animal species living in the same habitat) and geographic range of LLOV, further investigations involving bat-connected ecological niches are needed without unnecessary disturbance. The potential ecological ramifications of the negative effects on local bat populations have been reported for White Nose Syndrome in NorthvAmerica11. M. schreibersii and closely related Miniopterus species are widely distributed across Eurasia and have been known to roost in huge colonies of up to several thousand individuals12. These bats represent a significant concern regarding conservation biology since they represent an important ecological resource and an integral part of European biodiversity. It seems that LLOV may cause severe disease in one species of bat, resulting in mass mortalities in colonies. Therefore, increased attention from the scientific community and conservation biologists is required. Although any direct causality between mortality events in M. schreibersii and LLOV infection has not been shown, our findings of LLOV range expansion demonstrate the need for further investigation.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic analysis was performed based on a 346-nt partial sequence of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene with the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura 3-parameter model (+G+I). For the maximum-likelihood tree, the best fit nucleotide substitution model was selected based on the Bayesian information criterion as implemented in MEGA7 software13. Bootstrap replications were 1000. The sequence in this study is indicated with bold letters. Branch supports are represented by bootstrap values. Bootstrap values less than 50 are not shown. Branch lengths are measured in the number of substitutions per site.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree analysis was performed based on a 717-nt partial sequence of the nucleoprotein gene with the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura 3-parameter model (+G+I) in MEGA7 software13. Bootstrap replications were 1000. The sequence of this study is indicated with bold letters. Branch supports are represented by bootstrap values. Bootstrap values <50 are not shown. Branch lengths are measured in the number of substitutions per site


  1. 1.

    Feldmann, H. & Klenk, H. D. Marburg and Ebola viruses. Adv. Virus Res. 47, 1–52 (1996).

  2. 2.

    Coltart, C. E. M., Lindsey, B., Ghinai, I., Johnson, A. M. & Heymann, D. L. The Ebola outbreak, 2013–2016: old lessons for new epidemics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 372, 20160297 (2017).

  3. 3.

    Amman, B. R., Swanepoel, R., Nichol, S. T. & Towner, J. S. in: Marburg- and Ebolaviruses. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology Vol 411 (eds Mühlberger E., Hensley L. & Towner J.) (Springer, Cham, 2017)

  4. 4.

    Negredo, A. et al. Discovery of an ebolavirus-like filovirus in Europe. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002304 (2011).

  5. 5.

    Burk, R. et al. Neglected filoviruses. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 40, 494–519 (2016).

  6. 6.

    He, B. et al. Filovirus RNA in fruit bats, China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 21, 1675–1677 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Yang, X. L. et al. Genetically diverse filoviruses in rousettus and eonycteris spp. bats, China, 2009 and 2015. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 23, 482–486 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Feagins, A. R. & Basler, C. F. Lloviu virus VP24 and VP35 proteins function as innate immune antagonists in human and bat cells. Virology 485, 145–152 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Maruyama, J. et al. Characterization of the envelope glycoprotein of a novel filovirus, Lloviu virus. J. Virol. 88, 99–109 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Ng, al. Cell entry by a novel European filovirus requires host endosomal cysteine proteases and Niemann-Pick C1. Virology 637–646 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Frick, W. F. et al. An emerging disease causes regional population collapse of a common North American bat species. Science 329, 679–682 (2010).

  12. 12.

    Appleton, B. R., McKenzie, J. A. & Christidis, L. Molecular systematics and biogeography of the bent-wing bat complex Miniopterus schreibersii (Kuhl, 1817) (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31, 431–439 (2004).

  13. 13.

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).

Download references


The research activity of F.J. was supported by TÁMOP (4.2.4.A/2-11-1-2012-0001)—National Excellence Program. K.K. was supported by the Szentágothai Talent Program (awarded by the Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs). G.K. and F.J. were supported by the ÚNKP-17-3-III and ÚNKP-17-4-III – New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities, respectively. The project was supported by the European Union, co-financed by the European Social Fund: Comprehensive Development for Implementing Smart Specialization Strategies at the University of Pécs (EFOP-3.6.1.-16-2016-00004), and by the University of Pécs within the “Viral Pathogenesis” Talent Centre program. S.B. was supported by SH/4/13 Multipurpose assessment serving forest biodiversity conservation in the Carpathian region of Hungary (SAB).

Author information


  1. Szentágothai Research Centre, Pécs, H-7624, Hungary

    • Gábor Kemenesi
    • , Kornélia Kurucz
    • , Bianka Dallos
    • , Brigitta Zana
    • , Fanni Földes
    •  & Ferenc Jakab
  2. Aggtelek National Park Directorate, Jósvafő, H-3758, Hungary

    • Sándor Boldogh
  3. Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, H-1083, Hungary

    • Tamás Görföl
  4. Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK

    • Miles W Carroll


  1. Search for Gábor Kemenesi in:

  2. Search for Kornélia Kurucz in:

  3. Search for Bianka Dallos in:

  4. Search for Brigitta Zana in:

  5. Search for Fanni Földes in:

  6. Search for Sándor Boldogh in:

  7. Search for Tamás Görföl in:

  8. Search for Miles W Carroll in:

  9. Search for Ferenc Jakab in:

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gábor Kemenesi.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history






Further reading