TRIM33 plays a critical role in regulating dendritic cell differentiation and homeostasis by modulating Irf8 and Bcl2l11 transcription

The development of distinct dendritic cell (DC) subsets, namely, plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) and conventional DC subsets (cDC1s and cDC2s), is controlled by specific transcription factors. IRF8 is essential for the fate specification of cDC1s. However, how the expression of Irf8 is regulated is not fully understood. In this study, we identified TRIM33 as a critical regulator of DC differentiation and maintenance. TRIM33 deletion in Trim33fl/fl Cre-ERT2 mice significantly impaired DC differentiation from hematopoietic progenitors at different developmental stages. TRIM33 deficiency downregulated the expression of multiple genes associated with DC differentiation in these progenitors. TRIM33 promoted the transcription of Irf8 to facilitate the differentiation of cDC1s by maintaining adequate CDK9 and Ser2 phosphorylated RNA polymerase II (S2 Pol II) levels at Irf8 gene sites. Moreover, TRIM33 prevented the apoptosis of DCs and progenitors by directly suppressing the PU.1-mediated transcription of Bcl2l11, thereby maintaining DC homeostasis. Taken together, our findings identified TRIM33 as a novel and crucial regulator of DC differentiation and maintenance through the modulation of Irf8 and Bcl2l11 expression. The finding that TRIM33 functions as a critical regulator of both DC differentiation and survival provides potential benefits for devising DC-based immune interventions and therapies.


INTRODUCTION
Dendritic cells (DCs) are sentinels of the immune system and are crucial regulators of both innate and adaptive immunity.Originating from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and progenitors in the bone marrow (BM), DCs are widely distributed within lymphoid and peripheral nonlymphoid tissues in both mice and humans [1].DCs can be classified into conventional antigenpresenting DCs (cDCs) and type I interferon (IFN)-producing plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) [2].The cDCs contain the cDC1 and cDC2 subsets.cDC1s have an efficient antigen cross-presentation capacity that is crucial for inducing CD8 + T-cell responses in antiviral and antitumor immunity [2].cDC2s are important for inducing helper T-cell responses [2].Perturbation of DC homeostasis in humans and mice could result in severe immunodeficiencies, including increased susceptibility to infections and neoplasms, and autoimmune conditions [2][3][4][5].Hence, maintaining the homeostasis of DCs is pivotal and involves the regulation of DC differentiation and maintenance.
The development and fate specification of different DC subsets are precisely controlled by multiple transcription factors (TFs) to generate functionally distinct subsets.Some TFs, such as Ikaros and PU.1, are required for the differentiation of all DC subsets [6][7][8][9].Others are crucial for the differentiation of specific DC subsets, e.g., IFN regulatory factor 8 (IRF8), BATF3, ID2, NFIL3, ETV6, and DC-SCRIPT are required for cDC1 differentiation [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], while IRF4 and KLF4 are required for cDC2 differentiation [19,20].E2-2, ZEB2 and BCL-11A are essential for the differentiation of pDCs, and RUNX2 is required for their exit from the BM [21][22][23][24][25]. Strict regulation of the expression of these TFs is essential for maintaining DC homeostasis.In particular, some recent studies have shown that the expression of Irf8 in as early as lymphoidprimed multipotent progenitors (LMPPs) potentiates their differentiation toward cDC1s [26,27].In terminally differentiated cDC1s, IRF8 also maintains chromatin accessibility, transcriptome, and functionality in the cDC1 signature [28].The regulation of Irf8 expression in the DC lineage involves the switching of cis-acting superenhancers [29]: the differentiation of cDC1s is dependent on a + 41 kb enhancer of Irf8 [15], while switching to a + 32 kb enhancer promotes cDC1 maturation [11,[14][15][16].However, how these precise regulatory effects are achieved remains to be further TRIM33 was required for cell-intrinsic DC development We generated Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice, in which Trim33 can be systemically deleted after tamoxifen treatment, to further investigate whether TRIM33 is also required in earlier stages of DC development (Fig. S4A, B).Both in vivo tamoxifen administration and in vitro treatment of BM cultures with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) elicited efficient Trim33 deletion (Fig. S4C, D).Remarkably, tamoxifen treatment led to an almost complete loss of cDC1s and pDCs and a moderate reduction in the number of cDC2s in the spleen and BM of Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice (Fig. 1E, F).The lack of cDC1s and pDCs in Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice was not due to the altered expression of the used DC markers, since additional staining with XCR1 and CD24 for cDC1s and with CD45RA, PDCA-1 and B220 for pDCs was also performed to confirm the phenotype (Fig. S4E-G).The more drastic reduction in DCs in Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice than in Trim33 fl/fl Itgax-Cre mice suggested that TRIM33 might also play a crucial role in the development of DCs from an early stage.Consistent with previous reports [37,[40][41][42][43]48], we also observed decreased numbers of B cells, monocytes, and macrophages and increased numbers of granulocytes in Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice (Fig. 1G, Fig. S4H).A moderate decrease in the number of NK cells was also detected (Fig. S4H).
We generated BM chimeric mice by adoptively transferring BM cells from CD45.2 Trim33 fl/fl or CD45.2Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice together with CD45.1 wild-type BM cells to lethally irradiated CD45.1 recipients to determine which cellular compartment, i.e., hematopoietic or nonhematopoietic, contributed to the loss of cDC1s and pDCs in Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice after tamoxifeninduced TRIM33 deletion.Three weeks after transplantation, the chimeric mice were treated with tamoxifen for 5 consecutive days and analyzed after 7 additional days for CD45.2 donor BM-derived DC subsets (Fig. S4B).CD45.2 Trim33 fl/fl BM cells were able to reconstitute pDCs in the BM and all 3 subsets of DCs in the spleen of recipient mice (Fig. 1H, I).In contrast, CD45.2 Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 BM generated barely detectable cDC1 and pDC subsets and a reduced number of cDC2s, which recapitulated the DC defects of nonchimeric Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice (Fig. 1H, I).Moreover, the CD45.2Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 BM cells showed defective competition after tamoxifen treatment (Fig. 1I), which was consistent with the reported defects in BM self-renewal and the retention of TRIM33deficient HSCs and progenitors [37].In contrast, the reconstitution of DC populations and other immune cells by CD45.1 WT donor BM was comparable in chimeric mice with either tamoxifentreated CD45.2 Trim33 fl/fl or CD45.2Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice as recipients (Fig. S5), further indicating a cell autonomous role for TRIM33.Collectively, these results confirmed the hematopoietic cell-intrinsic roles of TRIM33 in DC development and homeostasis.
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis identified novel human DC subsets, including cDC2a, cDC2b, and AXL + DCs [49].We further examined whether TRIM33 plays a role in the development of the murine counterparts of these DC subsets.We  SiglecH -CD24 + CD172α -cDC1s, and CD11c + Si-glecH -CD24 -CD172α + cDC2s; thymic CD11c int B220 + pDCs, CD11c + B220 -CD24 + CD172α -cDC1s, and CD11c + B220 -CD24 -CD172α + cDC2s; and lymph node B220 + PDCA-1 + pDCs (Fig. S2A), CD3ε -CD19 -F4/      found that the proportions of the cDC2, cDC2a and cDC2b subsets [50] were also decreased by CD11c-conditoned Trim33 deletion (Fig. S6A, B).The numbers of noncanonical DCs and AXL + transitional DCs (tDCs) [51] were unchanged in Trim33 fl/fl Itgax-Cre mice (Fig. S6C, D) but were significantly reduced in tamoxifentreated Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice (Fig. S6E, F), suggesting a dependence on TRIM33 for the development of noncanonical DCs and tDCs from their early precursors or incomplete TRIM33 deletion in the former model, as CD11c levels in these cells were relatively low [51].These results further confirmed that TRIM33 was required for the homeostasis of all DCs.An Flt3L (FL, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand) in vitro culture system for DC generation [52] was utilized with the addition of 4-OHT to determine the kinetics of DC generation from the BM cells of Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice and further determine the role of TRIM33 in DC development.As shown in Fig. S7, Trim33 fl/fl BM readily generated increasing numbers of cDC1s, cDC2s, and pDCs with time, while Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 BM generated significantly fewer numbers of all three DC subsets at all the timepoints detected.Taken together, these results indicated that TRIM33 deficiency resulted in a cell-intrinsic impairment of DC development.
Although the numbers of CMPs and CD115 + CDPs were decreased, which might partly account for the loss of the cDC and pDC subsets, the increased numbers of MPPs, CLPs and CD115 - CDPs seemed contradictory to the reduced numbers of DCs in TRIM33-deficient mice.We determined the DC generation capacity of each purified progenitor population (Fig. S8) in vitro by Flt3L culture to address this issue (Fig. 3).The capacities of TRIM33deficient MPPs, CMPs and CD115 + CDPs to generate both cDCs and pDCs and the ability of TRIM33-deficient CLPs to generate pDCs were substantially impaired (Fig. 3A, B).TRIM33-deficient CD115 - CDPs exhibited an impaired ability to produce pDCs and cDC1s but generated a comparable number of cDC2s to WT CD115 -CDPs (Fig. 3A, B).These results showed that despite the increased numbers, the DC generation capacities of TRIM33-deficient MPPs, CLPs and CD115 -CDPs were substantially impaired.Taken together, our findings indicated that TRIM33 was required for the development of DCs from progenitors at different developmental stages.
Noticeably, TRIM33-deficient MPPs and CMPs exhibited severe defects in generating all DC progenies in Flt3L cultures (Fig. 3A, B), which seemed discordant with the in vivo phenotype of a moderate reduction in cDC2s.This finding suggested that TRIM33 deficiency might affect the maintenance of DC progenitors in culture.By culturing BM progenitors purified from Trim33 fl/fl and Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice in vitro with or without supporting growth factors, including stem cell factor (SCF) and Flt3L, we found that TRIM33 deficiency resulted in survival and expansion defects in all DC progenitors, including LSKs (Lin -Sca-1 + CD117 + , containing HSCs and MPPs), CMPs, CLPs, CD115 + CDPs, CD115 -CDPs and pre-DCs, but not in non-DC-producing GMPs (Fig. S9).Among the DC progenitors, the survival of the TRIM33-deficient CLPs was most strongly impaired (Fig. S9).Taken together, TRIM33 is indispensable for the maintenance of DC progenitors.
We therefore investigated the genome-wide binding sites of TRIM33, CDK9, and S2 Pol II in wild-type CDPs via a CUT&Tag assay.As shown in Fig. S12C-F, similar to those of the CDK9 and S2 Pol II signals, the TRIM33 signals were centered on transcription start sites (TSSs) and located primarily in promoter regions, suggesting a transcriptional regulatory role.Remarkably, compared with the H3K27 acetylation (H3K27ac) chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq) datasets of CDPs [11], 99.5% (1230/1236) of TRIM33 binding sites were located in active enhancer regions denoted by H3K27ac [64], and 93.7% (1158/ 1236) of TRIM33 regions were colocalized with S2 Pol II on transposase-accessible H3K27ac-enriched chromatin (Fig. 5B).Further analysis revealed that the recruitment of detectable    CDK9 to chromatin in the CDPs was substantially reliant on the presence of TRIM33 (Fig. 5C), although only a portion of the S2 Pol II peak intersected with TRIM33.A motif analysis of the TRIM33 peaks revealed possible colocalization with PU.1, in accordance with previous reports [37,40], and several other TFs with unknown functions in DC development (Fig. S12G).
As the data strongly suggested the active engagement of TRIM33 in the gene transcription of CDPs, especially at enhancer sites, only 1.8% of the genes annotated from the TRIM33 peaks matched the RNA-seq-detected DEGs in progenitors.Suspecting that some of the transcriptome alterations in TRIM33-deficient progenitors were secondary to changes in the expression or function of master regulators, we performed a TSS TF enrichment analysis of the DEGs and found that PU.1 and IRF8 were among the top predicted genes (Fig. 5D).We first hypothesized that the loss of TRIM33 colocalization on chromatin might disturb the transcriptional regulatory function of PU.1.We intersected the DEGs with the PU.1-dependent genes in DCs defined by Chopin et al. [9] to elucidate this possibility and found that 32.7% (222/ 678) of the TRIM33-regulated genes were under dual control of TRIM33 and PU.1, half by collaboration (50.9%, 113/222) and the other half by antagonization (49.1%, 109/222) (Fig. 5E, Table S3).Importantly, the collaboration of TRIM33 and PU.1 promoted the expression of more cDC-associated genes, while the antagonistic effect of TRIM33 on PU.1-mediated suppression was attributed to the expression of more pDC-associated genes (Fig. S12H).Hence, TRIM33 regulated DC development by influencing the transcriptional regulatory function of PU.1 in DC progenitors.
By intersecting genomic regions occupied by TRIM33 in CDPs to those of PU.1 in CDPs or IRF8 in cDC1s [14,65], we found that while TRIM33 and IRF8 shared only a few co-occupancy sites (Figs.5F), 29.2% (361/1236) of TRIM33 peaks were also bound by PU.1 (Fig. 5G, Table S4).Noting that almost all TRIM33 peaks were H3K27ac-enriched sites that are active enhancers, we further revealed with SEA [66] that 61.2% of these shared peaks were superenhancers in mouse CDPs, and 31.6% were located in nonpromoter regions (Fig. 5G).We again noticed that only a few RNA-seq-detected DEGs, such as Adora3 and Cadm1, were consistent with the annotation of the shared peaks of PU.1 and TRIM33 (Fig. S12I, Fig. 5H, I).A visual inspection revealed omissions during data processing, such as an initially unidentified -2 kb peak of Spib (Fig. 5J); however, annotating bias of distant enhancer peaks to genes of the greatest proximity instead of regulated genes may be present.EnhancerAtlas 2.0, a tool capable of enhancer-target gene prediction [67], further revealed a potential enhancer of the pro-apoptotic BIM-encoding gene Bcl2l11 that was 117.3 kb upstream (Fig. 5K).TRIM33 was reported to repress Bcl2l11 expression in murine B-ALL by antagonizing PU.1 binding at the -117.3 kb enhancer [40].Considering the accelerated death of TRIM33-deficient progenitors in vitro (Fig. S9) and the elevated Bcl2l11 transcript level in these cells (Fig. S12J), TRIM33 antagonization of PU.1-directed Bcl2l11 transcription might be required for DC progenitor survival.Therefore, TRIM33 supports the differentiation and survival of the DC lineage by modulating the transcriptional control of PU.1-regulated genes, including Bcl2l11.

TRIM33 promoted Irf8 transcription by influencing S2 Pol II chromatin occupancy
We further analyzed the CUT&Tag data by visualizing TRIM33 binding to the Irf8 locus to understand how a marked decrease in IRF8 levels in TRIM33-deficient progenitors was achieved.Interestingly, although the results revealed little or no significant binding of TRIM33 to the Irf8 gene body or the known -50 kb, +32 kb, +41 kb, and +56 kb enhancers [11,68,69], TRIM33 binding to distal enhancer-like regions, such as -147 kb and possibly -172 kb and -197 kb, was detected (Fig. 5L).Moreover, Capture C data from CDPs [70] indicated that the cis-regulatory element of Irf8 could extend beyond this distance (Fig. S12K).However, whether these sites could be genuine enhancers of Irf8 that control its expression and in vivo DC development remains to be further investigated.Since CUT&Tag technology has not been validated for co-factor analysis and might underestimate authentic TRIM33 occupancy, we performed TRIM33 ChIP-qPCR directly targeting the Irf8 promoter, gene body (TSS to 20 kb), and known +32 kb and +41 kb DC-relevant enhancers in BM Lin -precursors.
Relatively weak yet significant TRIM33 occupancy was confirmed at these sites in wild-type cells (Fig. 5M).More importantly, we observed a significant decrease in the occupancy of CDK9, S2 Pol II, and S5 Pol II, but not total Pol II, at these sites following tamoxifen-induced TRIM33 deletion in Lin -precursors (Fig. 5N-P, Fig. S12L).The loss of S2 Pol II, the active transcribing form of Pol II, around the Irf8 locus due to the absence of TRIM33 and the reduction in CDK9 recruitment significantly reduced the generation of Irf8 transcripts.Hence, these results support a role for TRIM33 in promoting Irf8 transcription in DC progenitors and precursors via chromatin occupancy.
Notably, overexpression of Irf8 alone in TRIM33-deficient BM Lin -cells (Fig. S13A) did not restore cDC1 generation from these cells in Flt3L cultures (Fig. S13B, C).This finding further suggested additional targets of TRIM33 that cooperate with IRF8 in the regulation of DC differentiation and homeostasis.
TRIM33 maintained DC survival by suppressing Bcl2l11 transcription We previously showed a role for TRIM33 in the maintenance of DC progenitor survival and suggested that the repression of Bcl2l11 by TRIM33 is the underlying mechanism, yet the IRF8 insufficiencyinduced developmental impairment, for instance, MDP to CDP and pre-cDC1 to cDC1 transitions [10], might directly elicit cell death.We then explored whether TRIM33 utilizes any IRF8-independent mechanism to promote DC lineage maintenance.Changes in the IRF8 level and cell viability of sorted Trim33 fl/fl and Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 CDPs over time were traced in 4-OHT-supplemented cultures, and a significant decrease in the survival of Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 cultures occurred before the decrease in the IRF8 level (Fig. S14).Therefore, TRIM33 maintained DC lineage survival through an IRF8-independent mechanism.We then further examined the effect of TRIM33 on the survival of downstream differentiated DCs.Indeed, we observed that DCs that differentiated from TRIM33deficient pre-DCs also failed to persist in prolonged culture (Fig. S15A, B).More importantly, when Trim33 was deleted at a later stage of DC development in Trim33 fl/fl Itgax-Cre mice, the RNAseq-detected expression of critical DC differentiation-related genes was not altered in cKO DCs (Fig. S15C), suggesting that a failure of cell maintenance, rather than defective differentiation, was the major cause of reduced DC numbers in Trim33 fl/fl Itgax-Cre mice.
The viability of purified WT and TRIM33-deficient Flt3L-induced DC subsets (FL-DCs) (Fig. 6A, B) was measured by performing Annexin V and 7-AAD staining to further test whether TRIM33 regulates DC survival.In addition to the known rapid death of DCs in culture in vitro [71,72], we found that all 3 subsets of FL-DCs exhibited accelerated cell death upon Trim33 deletion (Fig. 6C, D), with or without granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and Toll-like receptor agonists, factors known to influence DC survival.Consistently, upon Trim33 deletion, DC2.4 [73], a well-characterized DC cell line, also exhibited impaired cell survival (Fig. 6E, F).A greater proportion of Annexin V + 7-AAD - early apoptotic Trim33-deleted FL-cDCs indicated cell death by apoptosis (Fig. 6C).Moreover, increased cleavage of both Caspase-3 and PARP was detected in all 3 subsets of TRIM33-deficient FL-DCs, indicating that Trim33 deletion resulted in enhanced activation of the apoptosis pathway (Fig. 6G).Taken together, these findings suggest that TRIM33 acts as a suppressor of DC apoptosis.We analyzed the RNA-seq data again to explore how TRIM33 suppressed DC apoptosis, and the results revealed that the 3 subsets of TRIM33-deficient DCs exhibited no common downregulation of antiapoptotic genes, whereas the only upregulated proapoptotic gene in all DC subsets was Bcl2l11 (Fig. S15D-F, Table S5, Fig. 7A).Increased Bcl2l11 expression at both the mRNA and protein levels was found in all subsets of TRIM33-deficient splenic DCs, FL-DCs, DC2.4 cells (Fig. 7B-E).Therefore, TRIM33 prevents DC apoptosis by suppressing Bcl2l11 expression.
Given our previous results of TRIM33 and PU.1 colocalization at the -117.3 kb enhancer of Bcl2l11 in CDPs (Fig. 5K), we further tested whether this colocalization also occurred in DCs.By performing ChIP-seq and ChIP-qPCR analyses, we identified simultaneous TRIM33 and PU.1 occupancy at the reported -117.3 kb Bcl2l11 enhancer but not at other sites in DC2.4 cells, Mutu DC1940 cells, and all subsets of primary DCs (Fig. 7F, G).The binding of PU.1 to such sites in MPPs was also revealed by investigating published data [65].PU.1 activates transcription by recruiting CREB-binding protein (CBP) to bridge the basal transcription machinery and promote regional H3K27ac intensity [74,75].We found that in TRIM33-deficient DC2.4 cells, although the H3K27ac intensity was unaltered, the localization of PU.1 and CBP at the -117.3 kb region of the Bcl2l11 enhancer site was enhanced (Fig. 7H).Therefore, TRIM33 occupancy at the -117.3 kb Bcl2l11 enhancer in DCs antagonized PU.1-directed transcription of Bcl2l11 and maintained DC survival.We also verified that efficient knockdown of Bcl2l11 by an shRNA restored the survival of Trim33 KO DC2.4 cells (Fig. 7I-K).Hence, TRIM33 likely suppresses DC apoptosis by repressing Bcl2l11 transcription through antagonizing PU.1-induced Bcl2l11 expression.
TRIM33 regulated DC development and maintenance by modulating Irf8 and Bcl2l11 transcription BM CD45.2 + Lin -precursors were isolated from Trim33 fl/fl and Trim33 fl/fl Itgax-Cre mice, transduced with the mAmetrine fluorescent protein-expressing negative control (NC) or shBIM vector, and allowed to restore DC homeostasis in lethally irradiated recipients to further validate whether TRIM33 suppressed Bcl2l11 transcription to support DC maintenance in vivo (Fig. 8A).The knockdown of Bcl2l11 in mAmetrine + Lin -cells was efficient (Fig. 8B), and in vivo differentiated CD45.2 + DCs retained vector expression upon analysis (Fig. S16A).We found that NC-and shBIM-transduced WT Lin -cells generated all three subsets of splenic DCs in comparable numbers and proportions (Fig. 8C-E), in agreement with a previous report in which the DC numbers and percentages of Bcl2l11 -/-mice were comparable to those of WT mice [30].In contrast, Bcl2l11 knockdown significantly rescued the numbers of all DC subsets derived from CD45.2 + cKO Lin -cells by 6-15-fold (Fig. 8C-E).No significant differences in the numbers of total CD45.2 + splenocytes in any of the experimental groups were observed (Fig. S16B).Thus, these data further show that TRIM33 maintains DC homeostasis by suppressing Bcl2l11 expression.
Because we showed that TRIM33 was required for both promoting Irf8 expression and tuning the PU.1-dependent transcriptome during DC development, as exemplified by the repression of Bcl2l11, we speculated that both functions of TRIM33 contributed to DC differentiation and maintenance, especially for cDC1s, considering the major fate-specific role of IRF8.To determine whether this is the case, We simultaneously overexpressed Irf8 and knocked down Bcl2l11 in Trim33 fl/fl or Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 BM Lin -cells and measured their DC generation capacity to analyze our hypothesis.Notably, Bcl2l11 knockdown may prevent an underestimation of the effects of Irf8 overexpression; with Bcl2l11 knockdown, any cell whose generation was rescued in culture may survive to the day of detection.The Irf8 overexpression alone group and the Bcl2l11 knockdown alone group were used as controls.Even with efficient overexpression or knockdown (Fig. 8F), Irf8 overexpression or Bcl2l11 knockdown alone was unable to significantly restore DC generation from TRIM33-deficient BM Lin -cells (Fig. 8G, H), probably resulting from the death of the generated cells and developmental impairment, respectively.Nevertheless, Irf8 overexpression combined with Bcl2l11 knockdown significantly restored cDC1 production from TRIM33-deficient BM Lin -precursors (Fig. 8H), further revealing the additive role of these TRIM33 targets in DC homeostasis.Taken together, these results further illustrate that TRIM33 promotes Irf8 expression for cDC1 differentiation and suppresses PU.1-dependent Bcl2l11 expression for DC survival and maintenance.

DISCUSSION
IRF8 is known as the key TF for cDC1 lineage specification.In this study, we identified TRIM33 as a novel regulator of IRF8 expression.TRIM33 deficiency significantly reduced the expression of Irf8 and other DC-associated genes in DC progenitors, leading to a profound deficiency in DC differentiation.A mechanistic study revealed that TRIM33 was directly engaged at the gene body and the superenhancer of Irf8, possibly within complexes that modulate chromatin accessibility and transcription.In particular, by interacting with CDK9, the catalytic subunit of P-TEFb, TRIM33 promoted S2 Pol II localization and subsequent transcription of the Irf8 gene, which facilitated Irf8 expression and cDC1 differentiation.When the survival of all cells generated in culture was ensured by Bcl2l11 inhibition, Irf8 overexpression was able to reverse the deficiency of cDC1 development from TRIM33-ablated Lin -precursors.Furthermore, we identified the -147 kb, -172 kb, and -197 kb sites as potential candidates for previously unrecognized Irf8 enhancer regions, although whether these regions can control Irf8 expression and DC development and whether they can bind to other important TFs require future exploration.
In addition to regulating Irf8 expression and cDC1 fate specification, we found that TRIM33 was also crucial for tuning the PU.1-dependent transcriptome.Kusy et al. first reported that TRIM33 antagonizes PU.1-directed transcription by colocalization to repress exaggerated myelomonocytic expansion and verified this mechanism for 3 genes, p15 INK4b , Egr2, and Fcgr2b [37].With cell lines and bone marrow-derived macrophages, the same group further reported that TRIM33 and PU.1 colocalize at multiple sites in macrophages [43] and confirmed that TRIM33 antagonizes PU.1-directed transcription at distant cis elements of Ifnb1 and Atp1b3 [44,76].Wang et al. reported that TRIM33 antagonization of PU.1 at the -117.3 kb Bcl2l11 enhancer is required for B-ALL cell survival [40].In this study, we identified for the first time that TRIM33 also collaborated with PU.1 in DC fate determination and that numerous PU.1-dependent genes in DC progenitors were subjected to TRIM33 modulation through its occupancy at active enhancer sites.As proper tools for accurate annotation of distant enhancer-target gene relationships are lacking, we call for better resources in the future to fully elucidate the value of many of the shared peaks of TRIM33 and PU.1 in CDPs.Nevertheless, we were able to confirm that TRIM33 and PU.1 antagonize the -117.3 kb Bcl2l11 enhancer and that they play a critical role in cell survival throughout the development and maintenance of the DC lineage.In this study, we showed for the first time that the survival of all subsets of DCs and DC progenitors required active suppression of Bcl2l11 transcription by TRIM33, which prevented PU.1-programmed apoptosis under steady-state conditions.These findings should arouse interest, as the field has long been bothered by the short lifespan of DCs, while PU.1 was always considered a favorable master factor for DCs, or at least cDCs.Notably, the observed expansion of MPPs, CD115 -CDPs, and CLPs in TRIM33deficient mice could have resulted from in vivo compensatory feedback responses to defective DC survival and a reduced pool size [77].Interestingly, our findings, together with those of   previous reports [36,40,41,43], suggested that the antagonization of the PU.1-dependent -117.3 kb Bcl2l11 enhancer by TRIM33 was required for the survival of DC, B cell, and macrophage lineages but not granulocyte or T-cell lineages.
The impaired pDC differentiation from progenitors and the exacerbated Bcl2l11-dependent cell death of DCs and their progenitors, especially CLPs, might collectively account for the marked reduction in pDCs in TRIM33-deficient mice.We observed significantly downregulated expression of pDC-associated genes in progenitors following TRIM33 deletion, which could partially result from the loss of TRIM33 antagonization of PU.1-mediated suppression of the pDC transcriptome, such as Spib.Chopin et al. showed that PU.1 favored a Zfp366-containing cDC transcription program over the pDC program and repressed pDC signatures in cDC determination [9].Our results were consistent with these findings, showing that TRIM33 could suppress part of the PU.1mediated transcriptional program to promote pDC development while collaborating with PU.1 for cDC determination.However, whether IRF8 functions as a cell-intrinsic factor required for pDC differentiation has been debated [10,17,78].The Irf8 overexpression system we used resulted in an exceedingly high IRF8 level, which strongly biased the precursors to cDC1 differentiation, hence reducing pDC production by WT progenitors.This finding may further support that IRF8 is not absolutely required for pDC specification and that an overly high level of IRF8 under certain circumstances may even inhibit pDC differentiation.
Regarding the role of TRIM33 in cDC2s, our current results confirmed the requirement of Bcl2l11 suppression for the survival of cDC2s and their progenitors.Additionally, we illustrated that TRIM33 was required to facilitate the expression of PU.1-related cDC signature genes that promoted cDC2 development.Notably, in the motif analysis of TRIM33 binding sites, Krüppel-like factor (KLF) was identified; since KLF4 was found to be important for cDC2 cells, this possibility could be further explored.Interestingly, we also observed that elevated cDC1 production from WT progenitors with exceedingly high expression of Irf8 occurred at the expense of cDC2s, consistent with the recent findings reported by Lanca et al. that IRF8 maintains the identity of terminally differentiated cDC1s and prevents reprogramming toward cDC2s [28].However, in our animals, no expansion of the cDC2 subset was observed as a result of this mechanism.For Trim33 fl/fl Itgax-Cre mice, this outcome was more likely due to the unaltered expression of Irf8 in DCs.Moreover, although the expression of Irf8 was significantly reduced with Cre-ER T2mediated early TRIM33 ablation in progenitors, Bcl2l11 expression was enhanced in the same cells, which therefore led to impaired survival and differentiation of those progenitors to all DCs, including cDC2s.The differences we observed in cDC2 generation between in vivo and in vitro experiments, i.e., moderately reduced numbers of cDC2s in the spleens of TRIM33-deficient mice and TRIM33-deficient BM-reconstituted mice compared to the near absence of cDC2s in Flt3L cultures of TRIM33-deficient MPPs and CMPs, may be explained by the fact that the dying cDC2 progenitors could be continuously replenished by compensatory mechanisms in vivo, while cDC2s appeared to be relatively less sensitive to cell death signals than were pDCs and cDC1s [71,72,79].In contrast, in the in vitro culture system, the dying DC progenitors could not be replenished, and the development of all DCs was severely impacted.
In summary, we reported for the first time that TRIM33 plays a crucial role in DC differentiation and homeostasis by promoting Irf8 expression for cDC1 development and modulating PU.1 transcriptional functions, such as actively suppressing Bcl2l11 expression in all DC subsets and their progenitors, to maintain cell survival.Given the unique role of cDC1s in antitumor immune responses, the identification of TRIM33 as a key regulator of cDC1 differentiation and DC survival may aid in the development of new strategies for DC-based immune modulations and therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Animals
Trim33 fl/fl mice on a C57BL/6 background were generated as previously reported [36,46].The floxed mice were crossed with Cre-ER T2 (Jax: 008463) mice or Itgax-Cre (Jax: 008068, gifted by Dr. Nan Shen, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China) to generate Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 and Trim33 fl/fl Itgax-Cre descendants.In vivo Trim33 knockout by Cre recombinase was induced by an i.p. injection of 2 mg of tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich, #T5648-1G) for 5 consecutive days, followed by additional maintenance for 7 days.Sexmatched 6-to 10-week-old mice were used in all experiments.Wild-type C57BL/6, CD45.1 (Jax: 002014), OT-I (Jax: 003831) and OT-II (Jax: 004194) mice were bred in house.All mice were maintained on a 12 L:12D cycle in a specific pathogen-free facility at Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.The experiments were conducted according to procedures approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tsinghua University.

BM chimeric mice
BM chimeric mice were generated by mixing 2 10 6 total BM cells from Trim33 fl/fl mice or Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice with 2 10 5 total wild-type CD45.1 BM cells, and these cells were i.v.injected into CD45.1 recipients lethally irradiated by two consecutive 5.5 Gy doses with 2 h of intermission.Mice were treated with tamoxifen 3 weeks after transplantation, as described above.For competitively reconstituted mice, 1 10 6 CD45.1 and 1 10 6 BM cells from CD45.2 Trim33 fl/fl or Trim33 fl/fl Itgax-Cre mice were i.v.

Flow cytometry
Rat gamma globulin (Jackson, #012-000-002) or a homemade anti-CD16/32 antibody was used to minimize nonspecific staining.The cells were stained with the fluorescent dye-conjugated antibodies listed in Table S6 at 4 °C for 30 min, washed, and resuspended in 3% FBS-containing homemade balanced salt buffer.The apoptosis analysis was performed using Annexin V reagents and 7-AAD provided by BioLegend (Table S6) according to the manufacturer's instructions.A Foxp3/transcription factor staining buffer set (eBioscience, #00-5523-00) was used to fix and permeabilize the cells for intracellular staining.Flow cytometry data were acquired with a BD LSRFortessa instrument and analyzed with FlowJo.Sorting was performed on a BD AriaIII instrument.The yields of the sorted progenitors or precursors per mouse are listed in Table S7.
For Irf8 overexpression, the murine Irf8 coding sequence was cloned and inserted into the pMYs-IRES-GFP vector (Cell Biolabs, #RTV-021).A targeting shRNA sequence (sense: 5'-GACGAGTTCAACGAAACTTAC-3') was cloned and inserted into the pMSCV-LTRmiR30-IRES-mAmetrine (LMA) vector to knockdown Bcl2l11 with RNAi.Plat-E cells were transfected with the plasmids to package retroviruses.The retroviruses were spun onto RetroNectin (Takara, #T100B)-coated nontissue culture plates at 37 °C and 2000 g for 2 h, after which expanded Lin -cells were added for incubation for 48-60 h.The transduced cells were then sorted using a cytometer.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)
Total RNA from the sorted cells was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, #15596018) following the manufacturer's protocol.Prime-Script™ RT master mix (Takara, #RR036A) was used to synthesize cDNA.qPCR was performed on a 7900HT fast real-time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems) with PowerUp™ SYBR™ green master mix (Applied Biosystems, #A25742).The primers [40,81] used in this study are listed in Table S8.

Mass spectrometry
Lin -FLT3 + cells isolated from the BM of wild-type C57BL/6 mice were lysed in Western and IP lysis buffer (Beyotime, #P0013) supplemented with proteinase and phosphatase inhibitors on ice for 30 min.The lysates were incubated with an anti-TRIM33 antibody (Bethyl Laboratories, #A301-059A) or control IgG (Cell Signaling Technology, #2729) at 4 °C overnight before the immunoprecipitates were purified with Protein A + G magnetic beads (Millipore, #16-663).The samples were then subjected to SDS-PAGE for mass spectrometry analysis at the Technology Center for Protein Sciences of Tsinghua University.The bands were excised from the gel, reduced with 5 mM DTT and alkylated with 11 mM iodoacetamide, followed by in-gel digestion with sequencing-grade modified trypsin at 37 °C overnight.The peptides were extracted twice with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in a 50% aqueous acetonitrile solution for 30 min and then dried in a SpeedVac.Peptides were redissolved in 20 μl of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and 6 μl of extracted peptides were analyzed with an LTQ Velos LTQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific).For the LC-MS/MS analysis, the peptides were separated by 120 min of gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.30 µl/min with a Thermo-Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system, which was directly interfaced with a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive mass spectrometer.The analytical column was a homemade fused silica capillary column (75 µm ID, 150 mm length; Upchurch, Oak Harbor, WA) packed with C-18 resin (300 Å, 5 µm, Varian, Lexington, MA).The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid, and mobile phase B consisted of 80% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid.The LTQ Velos mass spectrometer was operated in the datadependent acquisition mode using Xcalibur 2.1.2software, and a single full-scan mass spectrum was recorded in the Orbitrap (300-1800 m/z, 70,000 resolution) followed by 20 data-dependent MS/MS scans at 27% normalized collision energy (HCD).The MS/MS spectra from each LC-MS/ MS run were searched against the Mouse.fastadatabase from UniProt using an in-house Proteome Discoverer (Version PD1.4,Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).The search criteria were as follows: full tryptic specificity was needed; two missed cleavages were allowed; carbamidomethylation was set as the fixed modification; oxidation was set as the variable modification; precursor ion mass tolerances were set at 20 ppm for all MS acquired in an Orbitrap mass analyzer; and the fragment ion mass tolerance was set at 0.02 Da for all MS2 spectra acquired.The peptide spectrum match (PSM) was considered correct when q was <1%.The peptide false discovery rate (FDR) was calculated using Percolator provided by PD and determined based on PSMs when searched against the reverse decoy database.The FDR was also set to 0.01 for protein identification.Only peptides assigned to a given protein group were considered unique.The peak areas of fragment ions were used to calculate the relative intensity of precursor ions for selected peptides.The results were further filtered by unique peptides ≥ 2, score (anti-TRIM33-pulled) ≥ 2, and area (anti-TRIM33-pulled/IgG-pulled)>1.5 to generate 236 proteins considered authentic TRIM33-interacting molecules (Table S2).The R packages clusterProfiler 4.8.1 and enrichplot 1.20.0[82] were used for GO biological process enrichment (Q < 0.05) and further analyses.

Coimmunoprecipitation and Western blotting
Coimmunoprecipitation samples were acquired from Mutu DC1940 cells in an identical manner as described for mass spectrometry, but only the anti-CDK9 antibody (Abcam, #ab239364) was used along with the anti-TRIM33 antibody and IgG.For Western blotting, the samples were denatured, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and transferred to activated PVDF membranes.After blocking, the membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies listed in Table S6 overnight at 4 °C.After the membranes were washed and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies, SuperSignal™ West Pico PLUS chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #34578) was used for imaging with an Amersham Imager 600 System (GE).

CUT&Tag, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, sequencing, and data analysis
Sorted wild-type CD11c -CD127 -CD117 int FLT3 + CDPs were subjected to a CUT&Tag assay and library generation from 1 10 5 cells/sample with the Hyperactive In-Situ ChIP Library Prep Kit (Vazyme) following the manufacturer's instructions, as described previously [88].The antibodies used in this study are listed in Table S6.Sample quality verification, sequencing of PE150 reads on the HiSeq X platform, and raw read processing were performed by Annoroad Gene Technology (Beijing, China).Sorted BM Lin -cells from tamoxifen-treated Trim33 fl/fl or Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice and cultured DC2.4 cells or Mutu DC1940 cells were used for ChIP.Large numbers of primary DCs for ChIP-seq sample preparation (Fig. 7F) were acquired after 2 10 6 B16Flt3L cells were injected subcutaneously into wild-type male C57BL/6 mice to increase DC numbers [89].Splenic cDCs and BM pDCs were sorted 2 weeks after inoculation as described.For ChIP-seq or ChIP-qPCR, 2 10 7 cultured or sorted cells/ sample were prepared with the ChIP-IT ® Express Enzymatic Shearing Kit (Active Motif, #53035) after crosslinking the cells with 1% formaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min and quenching with 0.125 M glycine.The cells were digested, sonicated, and enzyme-sheared to obtain fragmented chromatin, which was incubated with antibodies (Table S6) or IgG at 4 °C overnight.The immunoprecipitated chromatin was purified with Magna ChIP™ Protein A + G magnetic beads (Millipore, #16-663), decrosslinked, and extracted with a MinElute PCR purification kit (Qiagen, #28004).Sample quality was checked on a D1000 ScreenTape system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) by electrophoresis, and samples with fragment sizes between 150 and 1000 bp and major peaks between 150 and 300 bp were considered appropriate for further experiments.For samples sent for ChIPseq, aliquots were retained for future ChIP-qPCR verification.qPCR was performed as described above.The primers used for the Irf8 locus and the primers used for the Bcl2l11 upstream region [40] can be found in Table S8.For ChIP-seq, libraries were constructed following standard Illumina protocols and sequenced on the Illumina NovoSeq 6000 platform to generate paired-end 150 bp reads.Raw reads of sequencing data in FASTQ format were processed through fastp (v0.19.11) [90] or Trimmomatic (v0.40).BWA-MEM (v0.7.12) or Bowtie2 (v2.2.5) was used for mapping reads onto the reference genome (mm10).BAM files were indexed with samtools (v.1.4.1), and bigwig files for visual inspection with Integrative Genomic Viewer were generated using deepTools (v.3.5.2) [91,92].Wig tracks of the mm9 build in the GSE57563 and GSE66899 datasets were lifted over to mm10 with CrossMap (v.0.3.3) for comparison with the tracks generated in this study.Peaks were called with MACS2 (v.2.2.7.1) [93]: TRIM33 and CDK9 CUT&Tag-callpeak -m 2 50 q 0.01; S2PolII CUT&Tag-callpeak -m 2 50 q 0.01 -broad; ATAC-seq (GSE132240)-bdgpeakcall -c 2 -l 300 -g 150; H3K27ac ChIP-seq (GSE132239)-bdgbroadcall -c 2 -l 300 -g 150 -G 1200; PU.1 ChIP-seq (GSE57563)-bdgpeakcall-c 100-l 300-g 30; IRF8 ChIP-seq (GSE66899)-bdgpeakcall-c 5-l 300-g 30.Bedgraphs of PU.1 and IRF8 were preanalyzed for the optimum cutoffs to match the peak numbers in previous reports.Intervene (v0.6.4) [94] was used to intersect genomic regions.A heatmap of the binding distribution was generated with deepTools.The R package ChIPseeker (v.1.36.0) was utilized for peak annotation and the feature/distribution analysis, and clusterProfiler (v.4.8.1) was used for GO enrichment with a Q value cutoff set to 0.05 [82,95].The motif enrichment analysis was performed with MEME-ChIP under the default settings [96].TSS ± 2 kb regions of RNA-seq-detected DEGs were subjected to a TF enrichment analysis with ChIP-Atlas [97].The enhancer analysis was performed with SEA 3.0 [66] and Enhancer Atlas 2.0 [67].

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), in vivo antigen presentation assay, and LCMV infection model
The procedures are detailed in the Supplementary Materials.

Quantification and statistical analysis
All statistical analyses for non-RNA-seq data were performed with GraphPad Prism 8.3.The exact sample size (N) and statistical test results for each experiment are provided in the figure legends.Each presented experiment was representative of at least 2-3 independent repetitions to ensure data reproducibility.No data were excluded.A replicate is technical for the ChIP-qPCR experiments in Fig. 5 and biological for any other experiments.Bars represent the means ± SEMs.A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5 TRIM33 modulated the PU.1 transcriptional function and Irf8 expression via chromatin occupancy.A The interaction of TRIM33 with CDK9 in Mutu DC1940 cells was detected using coimmunoprecipitation.B, C Venn diagrams indicating the intersection between genomic regions bound by the indicated factors in CDPs.CDP TRIM33, CDK9, and S2 Pol II peaks were called from CUT&Tag data.CDP ATAC-seq and H3K27ac-ChIP region data were retrieved from the GSE132240 and GSE132239 datasets.D ChIP-Atlas analysis of RNA-seq-detected progenitor DEGs following TRIM33 deletion.FE, fold enrichment.E Intersection between TRIM33-reliant and PU.1-reliant transcriptomes.The percentages of TRIM33-dependent/repressed genes under the control of PU.1 are shown.F Intersection between CDP TRIM33 CUT&Tag peaks and cDC1 IRF8-ChIP (GSE66899) peaks.G Analysis of shared TRIM33 and PU.1 peaks in CDPs.PU.1-ChIP peaks were called from GSE57563.The superenhancer analysis was performed with SEA v3.0.H-L Visualization of TRIM33, CDK9, S2 Pol II CUT&Tag, PU.1-ChIP, H3K27ac ChIP, and ATAC-seq data at the indicated loci in CDPs.The reported +32 kb and +41 kb enhancer sites of Irf8 are shaded in orange.ChIP-qPCR analysis of TRIM33 (M), CDK9 (N), S2 Pol II (O), and total Pol II (P) occupancy at different regions of the Irf8 gene in BM Lin -cells from tamoxifen-treated Trim33 fl/fl (WT) and Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 (KO) mice.N = 3-4.The data are representative of 2 independent experiments.Bars represent the means ± SEMs.The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001

Fig. 6
Fig. 6 TRIM33 deficiency resulted in accelerated DC apoptosis.A Schematic diagram of the generation of DCs from WT or Trim33 KO DCs in Flt3L cultures.BM cells from Trim33 fl/fl and Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 mice were cultured with 200 ng/mL Flt3L, and 1 µM 4-OHT was added on Days 3-4.FL-DCs were FACS-purified on Day 8. B qPCR analysis of Trim33 expression in FL-DCs of the indicated genotypes, n = 3. C, D Survival analysis of cultured WT (Trim33 fl/fl ) and KO (Trim33 fl/fl Cre-ER T2 ) FL-DCs.A total of 5 10 4 FACS-purified FL-DCs/well were cultured with or without the indicated supplements (20 ng/ml GM-CSF, 1 µM ODN 2216, 100 µg/mL poly(I:C), or 100 ng/mL LPS) for 12 h or 24 h before detection.The numbers in quadrants indicate percentages.D The percentages of viable (Annexin V -7-AAD -) FL-DCs after culture, n = 3. E, F Survival analysis of DC2.4 cells of the indicated genotypes.A total of 2.5 10 5 DC2.4 or DC2.4 Trim33 KO cells/well were seeded in 24-well plates and cultured for 48 h before detection.F The percentages of viable (Annexin V -7-AAD -) cells after culture are plotted as the means of 3 independent experiments.G Western blot analysis of Caspase-3 and PARP in FL-DCs cultured for 12 h.Approximately 1 10 5 cells/sample were loaded.The relative band intensities are shown.Bars represent the means ± SEMs.The data are representative of 3 independent experiments.Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student's t test.Ns: not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001

Fig. 7
Fig. 7 TRIM33 suppressed Bcl2l11 transcription through enhancer deactivation.A RNA-seq detected Bcl2l11 TPM in WT and cKO splenic DCs.N = 2-3, ****Q < 0.0001.qPCR analysis of Bcl2l11 mRNA levels in (B) splenic DCs, (C) FL-DCs and (D) DC2.4 cells of the indicated genotypes.N = 3-4.E Western blot detection of BIM levels in splenic DCs, FL-DCs and DC2.4 cells of the indicated genotypes.F ChIP-seq tracks displaying TRIM33 and PU.1 (GSE57563) binding at the Bcl2l11-117.3kb region in DCs and progenitors.The TRIM33-immunoprecipitated tracks are representative of 2 biological replicates.The Y-axis represents counts per million mapped reads (TRIM33-ChIP) or sequencing depth-normalized read counts (PU.1-ChIP).G, H ChIP-qPCR detection of TRIM33, PU.1, CBP and H3K27ac intensity at the Bcl2l11 locus in the indicated cell lines.Two to four biological replicates are plotted.The fold enrichment versus the isotype control IgG is presented.I Bcl2l11 knockdown efficiency in DC2.4 cell lines.NC negative control, shBIM shRNA knockdown of Bcl2l11.J, K Survival analysis of DC2.4 cells of the indicated genotypes.K Percentages of viable cells (annexin V -7-AAD -) plotted using the means of 3 independent experiments.The data are representative of 3 independent experiments.Bars represent the means ± SEMs.Statistical significance was determined using unpaired two-tailed Student's t tests (B-D, H) or multiple t tests (K).*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001

2 2 F 4 )Fig. 8
Fig.8Bcl2l11 knockdown and Irf8 overexpression simultaneously restored cDC1 generation from TRIM33-deficient BM Lin -precursors.A Scheme of the Lin -cell in vivo reconstitution experiment.Lin -cells were isolated from Trim33 fl/fl (WT) or Trim33 fl/fl Itgax-Cre (cKO) BM, expanded with Flt3L and SCF, transduced with shRNA constructs, and i.v.injected into recipients.B Bcl2l11 knockdown efficiency in transduced mAmetrine + WT and cKO Lin - cells.C-E Flow cytometry analysis of splenic DC populations in the indicated Lin -reconstituted mice.Pregate: viable, CD45.2 + mAmetrine + cells.The numbers on the plots indicate percentages.D Numbers of CD45.2 + mAmetrine + splenic DCs per animal from the indicated mice.E Fold increase in the number of each DC population of the indicated genotypes after Bcl2l11 knockdown.N = 6-10.F Irf8 overexpression and Bcl2l11 knockdown efficiency in BM Lin -cells.BM Lin -cells of the indicated genotypes were cotransduced with overexpression and shRNA vectors as previously described.G, H Flow cytometry analysis of DCs generated from Lin -BM cells transduced with the indicated construct pairs by Flt3L culture.Pregate: viable, CD45.2 + GFP + mAmetrine + cells.H Numbers of DCs generated per 1 10 4 input Lin -cells.N = 3. Bars represent the means ± SEMs.The data are representative of 2-3 independent experiments.The data were analyzed using unpaired two-tailed multiple t tests (D) or two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison test (H).Ns: nonsignificant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001