Novel cleavage sites identified in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reveal mechanism for cathepsin L-facilitated viral infection and treatment strategies

Zhao, Miao-Miao; Zhu, Yun; Zhang, Li; Zhong, Gongxun; Tai, Linhua; Liu, Shuo; Yin, Guoliang; Lu, Jing; He, Qiong; Li, Ming-Jia; Zhao, Ru-Xuan; Wang, Hao; Huang, Weijin; Fan, Changfa; Shuai, Lei; Wen, Zhiyuan; Wang, Chong; He, Xijun; Chen, Qiuluan; Liu, Banghui; Xiong, Xiaoli; Bu, Zhigao; Wang, Youchun; Sun, Fei; Yang, Jin-Kui

doi:10.1038/s41421-022-00419-w

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 06 June 2022

Novel cleavage sites identified in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reveal mechanism for cathepsin L-facilitated viral infection and treatment strategies

Cell Discovery volume 8, Article number: 53 (2022) Cite this article

9407 Accesses
32 Citations
187 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The spike (S) protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an important target for vaccine and drug development. However, the rapid emergence of variant strains with mutated S proteins has rendered many treatments ineffective. Cleavage of the S protein by host proteases is essential for viral infection. Here, we discovered that the S protein contains two previously unidentified Cathepsin L (CTSL) cleavage sites (CS-1 and CS-2). Both sites are highly conserved among all known SARS-CoV-2 variants. Our structural studies revealed that CTSL cleavage promoted S to adopt receptor-binding domain (RBD) “up” activated conformations, facilitating receptor-binding and membrane fusion. We confirmed that CTSL cleavage is essential during infection of all emerged SARS-CoV-2 variants (including the recently emerged Omicron variant) by pseudovirus (PsV) infection experiment. Furthermore, we found CTSL-specific inhibitors not only blocked infection of PsV/live virus in cells but also reduced live virus infection of ex vivo lung tissues of both human donors and human ACE2-transgenic mice. Finally, we showed that two CTSL-specific inhibitors exhibited excellent In vivo effects to prevent live virus infection in human ACE2-transgenic mice. Our work demonstrated that inhibition of CTSL cleavage of SARS-CoV-2 S protein is a promising approach for the development of future mutation-resistant therapy.

Loss of furin cleavage site attenuates SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis

Article 25 January 2021

Bryan A. Johnson, Xuping Xie, … Vineet D. Menachery

Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudotyped virus by recombinant ACE2-Ig

Article Open access 24 April 2020

Changhai Lei, Kewen Qian, … Shi Hu

Spike mutation D614G alters SARS-CoV-2 fitness

Article 26 October 2020

Jessica A. Plante, Yang Liu, … Pei-Yong Shi

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the novel SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in a global public health crisis. Most treatment strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection are focused on vaccines or antiviral drugs targeting the viral spike (S) protein^1,2 and the viral proteases, including the 3C-like protease (3CLpro, the main target of Paxlovid, Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 pill³) and the papain-like protease⁴ (PLpro). However, the evolution of RNA viruses is driven by their high mutation rates, allowing their evasion of host immune attacks^5,6. Despite multiple ongoing efforts to treat SARS-CoV-2 infections, variant strains with mutant spikes continue to emerge in many countries, causing new waves of infections with high morbidity^5,6,7,8. Of note, the very recently emerged Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) has an unusually high number of mutations, with more than 30 in S protein, 1 in 3CLpro, and 5 in PLpro. Therefore, antiviral drugs or vaccines targeting the viral proteins are likely to encounter the problem of resistant mutations. Indeed, three vaccines (Janssen, Novavax, and AstraZeneca) tested against the Beta variant (B.1.351) exhibited reduced effects on preventing symptomatic infection, with effectiveness estimates of 57%, 49%, and even a statistically insignificant percentage, respectively⁹. The serum neutralizing activity against the Beta (B.1.351) variant among vaccinated persons was reduced by 6.5- and 8.6-fold for the BNT162b2 (Pfizer) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) mRNA vaccines, respectively¹⁰. Molnupiravir is the chemical antiviral for the treatment of COVID-19 approved by the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). However, the final study results Merck announced very recently raised questions about the drug’s benefit¹¹. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop broad-spectrum and mutation-resistant treatment strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

During coronavirus infection, multiple host cell proteases, such as furin, transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), and cathepsin L (CTSL)^12,13,14 are known to process S protein; however, the exact sequence of protease cleavage and the interplay between host proteases remain poorly understood¹⁵. CTSL is a member of the lysosomal cysteine protease family, whose major function is proteolysis of antigens produced by pathogens. It is mainly detected in Golgi apparatus and traffic-related organelles like endosomes and lysosome¹⁶. It is highly expressed in most human tissues, including the respiratory system, gastrointestinal tract, kidney and urinary bladder, sexual tissues, bone marrow and lymphoid tissues, and endocrine tissues¹⁷. It was reported that SARS-CoV-2 can directly infect and injure many extrapulmonary organs, like the heart, kidney, liver, pancreas, and gastrointestinal tract^18,19,20, usually with high CTSL expression levels. Besides, the mRNA expression level of CTSL is higher than angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), FURIN, and TMPRSS2 in human lung tissues²¹. Recently, we found that in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, the circulating blood level of CTSL is highly correlated with the severity and course of COVID-19 symptoms. We also found that CTSL promotes SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus (PsV) infection by cleaving the S protein and enhancing viral entry into cells¹². However, the precise cleavage site and the mechanism by which CTSL activates the S protein remain uncharacterized. In addition, the effectiveness of CTSL inhibitors in preventing or treating infections of SARS-CoV-2 virus, remains unknown. In this study, we identified two specific cleavage sites for CTSL in SARS-CoV-2 S protein, which are highly conserved among all known SARS-CoV-2 variants. Mechanistic and functional studies revealed the mechanism by which CTSL cleavage is essential for efficient SARS-CoV-2 infection and inhibition of this process efficiently reduced virus infection. These results identify a new but promising target for broad-spectrum antiviral therapy development.

Results

CTSL cleaves the SARS-CoV-2 S protein at two specific sites

The trimeric S protein that incorporated into the SARS-CoV-2 envelope contains S1 and S2 subunits (Fig. 1a, b). The S1 subunit binds to the host cellular receptor, while the S2 subunit is involved in the virus-cell membrane fusion process²², which is followed by the release of viral genetic material into target cells²³. To study the structural and functional changes in the S protein upon treatment with CTSL, we cloned the mammalian codon-optimized nucleotide sequence encoding the SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan-Hu-1 strain, GenBank ID: MN908947.3) S protein ectodomain (residues M1–Q1208) with proline substitutions at K986 and V987 and a “GSAS” substitution at the furin cleavage site (S1/S2 site, R682–R685) and purified the resulting protein, named S_2P protein. This mutant S protein is widely used for structural and functional analysis due to its enhanced stability²⁴. After co-incubation with CTSL, the purified S protein was cleaved into three major fragments, and the reaction exhibited a dose-dependent relationship with the CTSL concentration (Fig. 1c). Based on N-terminal amino acid sequencing of these three fragments, we identified two novel CTSL cleavage sites of S, 259 T (named CTSL cleavage site 1 or CS-1) and 636Y (named CTSL cleavage site 2 or CS-2) (Fig. 1c; Supplementary Fig. S1a–c), which were further confirmed by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis (Supplementary Fig. S1d, e). CS-1 is located in the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the S1 subunit, while CS-2 is located in the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the S1 subunit (Fig. 1a). Similar to the furin cleavage site at S1/S2, both CTSL cleavage sites are located in the exposed loops of the prefusion S protein, which are accessible to proteases (Fig. 1b). We noted that a recent publication²⁵ analyzed the endogenous proteolysis sites of S protein during SARS-CoV-2 infection by mass spectrometry and identified many cleavage sites, including 260 A and 637 S. However, they did not make further assignments of the identified cleavage sites to specific proteases. Our work by discovering the CTSL cleavage sites correlates precisely with their work and provides the exact explanation of their data. As a result, we are more confident that the CTSL cleavage plays a very important role during the real SARS-CoV-2 infection process.

**Fig. 1: CTSL cleaves the SARS-CoV-2 S protein at two novel sites.**

To verify these two cleavage sites, we generated a mutant with mutations at the sites of CS-1 and CS-2. It has been reported that substrate recognition by CTSL is determined mainly by the cleavage site residue (named the P1 residue) and its adjacent upstream residue (named the P2 residue)²⁶. Therefore, we mutated both the P1 and P2 residues in CS-1 and CS-2 to glycine to generate a 4-Gly-mutant of S (Fig. 1e). As expected, treatment of the mutant with CTSL did not yield the two cleaved fragments, confirming the cleavage specificity at the sites of CS-1 and CS-2 (Fig. 1d).

CS-1 and CS-2 sites are highly conserved among SARS-CoV-2 variants

To date, many SARS-CoV-2 variants have been found in different countries (Fig. 1f). These variants exhibit enhanced transmission, pathogenicity, immune escape, or a combination of all three, and different countries can have different dominant variants²⁷. Variant viruses always encoded spike proteins with substitutions in antibody binding hot spots. In contrast, our newly identified CTSL cleavage sites in S protein are highly conserved in SARS-CoV-2 variants (Fig. 1f), including the recently emerged Omicron variant, suggesting that these CTSL cleavage sites may be essential for the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle.

It has been reported that SARS-CoV-2 may originate from bat coronaviruses²⁸, such as RaTG13. Further sequence analysis of SARS-CoV-related coronaviruses (SARSr-CoVs) found in humans, bats, and pangolins showed that the CS-2 site is highly conserved among most SARSr-CoVs while the site of CS-1 is conserved only among SARS-CoV-2 like CoVs (Supplementary Fig. S2a). It suggests that the two CTSL cleavage sites may evolve to fulfil different functional roles in different SARSr-CoVs. The highly conserved CS-2 site seems to be more essential for the life cycle of SARSr-CoVs, while CS-1 is likely to play an auxiliary role in virus infection. Moreover, we compared the conservation of the two CTSL cleavage sites among seven known human CoVs and found that these CTSL cleavage sites exist only in SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 (Supplementary Fig. S2b), suggesting that CTSL would play a unique role in the process of SARS-CoV-1/2 infection. This observation is consistent with previous studies showing that CTSL is also involved in SARS-CoV-1 infection²⁹.

CTSL cleavage activates SARS-CoV-2 S protein

To investigate how CTSL cleavage affects the structure of SARS-CoV-2 S, we performed cryo-EM studies of both the CTSL-treated and untreated S protein. The double-proline substitutions have been shown to affect S protein conformation and dynamics. Therefore, to further study the structural changes close to the natural state of S protein, we expressed and purified SARS-CoV-2 S protein ectodomain named S_R with minimum modifications³⁰. Compared to the full-length S protein, S_R protein contains the ectodomain (residues M1–Q1208) of S with a foldon at the C-terminus, and the furin cleavage site (P681 to R685) at the S1/S2 junction is replaced with a single arginine (R) resembling that in SARS-CoV-1 S to avoid the cleavage by furin during protein expression. The expression tags of trimeric foldon were removed by Tobacco Etch Virus protease (TEV) cleavage before our experiments (Supplementary Fig. S3a). We also confirmed that the cleavage pattern of S_R by CSTL is almost the same as that of S_2P (Supplementary Fig. S3b).

To ensure the comparability in the subsequent cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structural analysis, the samples in CTSL-treated group and control group were operated under the same condition, and the collected cryo-EM data were processed in the same workflow (Supplementary Fig. S4). In the untreated control group, all the particles fell into one population of the closed state (named S-closed) (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Figs. S4a and S8a), with a resolution of 3.2 Å in C3 symmetry according to the gold standard Fourier shell correlation coefficient at 0.143 (Supplementary Figs. S5 and S6). In this closed state, the surface of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) is buried inside the trimer and is not accessible for the receptor ACE2 binding^22,31. The NTD and fusion-peptide proximal region (FPPR) are highly ordered in this state, resembling the “locked” closed conformation that was previously reported in multiple studies using full-length or ectodomain S proteins^{30,31,32,33,34}.

**Fig. 2: Cryo-EM structures of CTSL-untreated and -treated SARS-CoV-2 S proteins.**

However, after CTSL treatment, the S particles fell into four different populations, including one closed state (S-closed, 26%) and three activated states, named S-1R-weak (25%), S-1R-open (17%), and S-2R-1N-weak (32%) (Supplementary Fig. S4b). Beside the S-2R1N-weak state (Supplementary Fig. S8b), the full pseudoatomic structural models for the other three states were built at a resolution range of 3.5–4.5 Å (Supplementary Figs. S5 and S6).

Except for the truncated NTD, the structure of S-closed state in CTSL-treated group is almost identical to that in the control group with a root mean square deviation (RMSD) value of only 0.677 Å (Fig. 2b; Supplementary Table S1). For the S-1R-weak state (also known as intermediate state), one of the three RBDs has a very weak density, suggesting that this RBD exposes from the buried surface and becomes dynamic for ACE2 binding (Fig. 2b)³⁵. The RMSD value between the rest part of S-1R-weak state and the S-closed state in CTSL-treated/control group is 0.899/1.277 Å, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). For the S-1R-open state, one of the three RBDs becomes upright and fully exposed for ACE2 binding (Fig. 2b)³¹, with RMSD values of 1.083/1.122 Å in comparison with the S-closed state in CTSL-treated/control group, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). We also noted that both NTDs in S-1R-weak and S-1R-open states are also truncated in comparison with the S-closed state of the control group, similar to the phenomenon observed for the S-closed state after CTSL treatment. The FPPR regions in S-1R-weak and S-1R-open states both have very weak densities, also suggesting that the S proteins at these two states are activated³². Moreover, the biolayer interferometry (BLI) experiment was performed to examine the interaction between S protein and human ACE2 receptors before and after CTSL cleavage (Supplementary Fig. S7). The results showed that CTSL treatment increased the binding affinity between S protein and ACE2 receptor, suggesting the activation of S protein by CTSL.

For the S-2R1N-weak state, although the resolution is too low to build the pseudoatomic model (Supplementary Fig. S8b), its functional domains, including NTD, C-terminal domain (CTD), and RBD, could be clearly distinguished from the cryo-EM map. In this state, two RBDs and one NTD all have very weak densities. We postulated that this state might represent a state in which S1 is dissociating to expose S2 subunit for membrane fusion.

Compared with the control group, the proportion of the inactive state population (S-closed) was significantly reduced from 100 to 26% after the cleavage by CTSL (Fig. 2b), suggesting that CTSL cleavage induces significantly increased dynamics of the RBDs and NTDs with an increased proportion of activated S.

Structural evidence for CTSL cleavage site

Although the overall structures of S trimer before and after CTSL treatment are basically the same (Fig. 2c), they have significant structural differences in the local regions around CS-1 and CS-2 sites. For the CS-1 region, residues from S255 to G261 can be clearly traced in the density map and the cleavage site of CS-1 between T259 and A260 can be modeled with high confidence before CTSL treatment (Fig. 2c). However, after CTSL treatment, all the densities around CS-1 site disappeared, and we can only build as far as G261 in the models of S-closed state, and A263/A264 in the S-1R-weak/S-1R-open state (Fig. 2c). These results confirmed the occurrence of CTSL cleavage around the CS-1 site.

For the CS-2 region, residues from W633 to N641 can be clearly traced in the density map and the cleavage site of CS-2 between Y636 and S637 can be modeled with high confidence before CTSL treatment (Fig. 2c). However, after CTSL treatment, all the densities around CS-2 site disappeared, and we can only build as far as N641 in the models of S-closed, S-1R-weak and S-1R-open states. These results also confirmed the occurrence of CTSL cleavage around the CS-2 site.

CTSL cleavage is essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection and cell fusion

Our structural studies above suggested the important role of CTSL cleavage in the activation of S protein. To verify these observations, we investigated the functions of CTSL during viral infection. We generated several mutants of PsVs based on the two cleavage sites (CS mutant), including CS-1 mutant (CS-1M), CS-2 mutant (CS-2M), and combination mutant (CS-1M + 2 M) (Fig. 3a). The binding affinity for hACE2 was not reduced in the CS mutant spike (CS-1M + 2 M) compared with the control S_2p (Supplementary Fig. S9a). As the proper control, we generated three PsV mutants that have been proven to escape furin cleavage: furin mutant (FM)-delta (deletion of residues 682–685), FM-ARAA (₆₈₂ARAA₆₈₅), and FM-GSAS (₆₈₂GSAS₆₈₅). The expression level of S protein in different PsVs was comparable (Supplementary Fig. S9b).

**Fig. 3: CTSL cleavage sites are essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection and efficient cell–cell fusion.**

Then, we compared the infectivity of wild-type (WT) and mutant PsVs in four human or monkey cell lines (Fig. 3b), which we have previously validated to have the highest susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection^6,12,36. It has been reported previously that entry into most (including Huh7, A549, and Vero E6) if not all of the cell lines tested depends on CTSL activity^12,37. All these cell lines can be infected with WT PsV. However, after the CTSL cleavage sites were mutated to glycine in CS mutant, these PsVs gradually lost most of their infection ability in all four cell lines. For CS-1M + 2 M PsV with both CTSL cleavage sites mutated, the viral infectivity was reduced 100–700-fold compared with that of WT PsV (Fig. 3b), showing that the two CTSL cleavage sites, especially CS-2, are essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Moreover, we also examined the infectivity in three 293 T/ACE2 cell lines with stable overexpression of CTSL, TMPRSS2, or FURIN (Fig. 3b). We found that the reduction in infectivity of CS mutant PsVs could not be fully rescued by overexpression of CTSL, TMPRSS2, or FURIN, indicating that the function of CTSL could not be fully substituted by TMPRSS2 or furin. Similar results were also observed with different PsV concentrations (Supplementary Fig. S9c).

The fusogenic activity of SARS-CoV-2 S is a character of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the presence of syncytia in COVID-19 patient lung tissue indicates that this activity plays a role in the pathological process³⁸. Syncytium formation was quantified with an ESR1-ERE transactivation system (Fig. 3c–e; Supplementary Fig. S10a, b) and observed by bright-field microscopy in our study (Fig. 3f). With the similar expression levels of S protein in transfected cells (Supplementary Fig. S10c), compared to the control group, the CS-1M group exhibited significantly reduced syncytium formation (Fig. 3e, f), while syncytium formation was inhibited even more severely in the CS-2M group, and almost no syncytia were observed in the CS-1M + 2 M group (Fig. 3e, f). More importantly, the inhibitory effects of these mutations were not rescued by the addition of CTSL into the system (Fig. 3e, f), confirming the promotive effect of CTSL on syncytium formation, as previously shown¹², was due to S protein cleavage at CS-1 and CS-2 sites. Taken together, our findings proved that CTSL cleavage at CS-1 and CS-2 sites is essential for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

CTSL cleavage promotes SARS-CoV-2 infection independent of furin

As the CS-2 region is very close to the furin cleavage site, we next investigated the relationship between CTSL cleavage and furin cleavage by using PsV infection assays in human Huh7 cell line^6,36,39 under CTSL overexpression or knockdown conditions (Supplementary Fig. S11). For WT PsV, overexpression of the CTSL gene markedly increased its infection efficiency, while knockdown of this gene significantly reduced the infection efficiency (Fig. 3g), similar to our previous finding¹². This result indicated that CTSL plays a crucial role in the SARS-CoV-2 infection process. Furthermore, for the FM-mutants PsVs, overexpression or knockdown of the CTSL gene also significantly affected the infection levels in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3g), similar to the effects on WT PsV. These results suggested that CTSL-enhanced SARS-CoV-2 viral entry is independent of furin cleavage.

The furin cleavage site has been reported required for SARS-CoV-2 S driven cell–cell fusion¹³. Here, we used the same cell fusion system (Fig. 3d) to evaluate the effect of CTSL on FM-mutants-mediated syncytium formation. FM-ARAA PsV induced a low level of syncytium formation similar to that of the control group (Fig. 3h, i). However, after CTSL was added to the mutant group, syncytium formation increased significantly, and this rescue effect exhibited a dose dependency with the concentration of CTSL (Fig. 3h, i). This result suggested that CTSL cleavage is an important furin-independent factor to induce SARS-CoV-2 S driven cell–cell fusion.

CTSL inhibitors prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection

Since CTSL plays a key role in mediating SARS-CoV-2 infection, we selected six compounds (K777, cathepsin inhibitor 1, E64d, Z-FY-CHO, MDL-28170, and oxocarbazate) that can inhibit CTSL activity by over 90% with a concentration ranging from 30 nM to 50 μM, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S12), and evaluated their effects on SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Firstly, we examined the antiviral effects of the six compounds against variants of SARS-CoV-2 (including the recently emerged Omicron variant) using the PsV infection assays (Fig. 4a). As we expected, all six compounds can efficiently inhibit infection of all mutant PsVs variants. Among them, E64d and MDL-28170 showed higher inhibitory efficiency against Omicron variant, while oxocarbazate was more effective against Epsilon variant. It seems that CTSL inhibitors are most likely resistant to mutational escape of SARS-CoV-2, including Omicron and Beta variants, against which the effects of most current vaccines are reduced^9,10,40. Neither of the compounds inhibited control vesicle stomatitis virus (VSV) PsV virus infection (Supplementary Fig. S13), indicating that the inhibitory effects of CTSL inhibitors depend on SARS-CoV-2 S protein.

**Fig. 4: CTSL inhibitors prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2 and mutant variant PsVs in vitro.**

Secondly, in the cellular experiments using live SARS-CoV-2 virus, all six compounds efficiently blocked SARS-CoV-2 infection at non-toxic doses, with half-maximal effective concentration (EC₅₀) values ranging from 35 nM to 10.9 μM (Fig. 4b). All compounds decreased the viral RNA load in Vero E6 cells by ~103- to 104-fold at the maximal non-toxic dose. This finding further confirmed the critical role of CTSL cleavage in SARS-CoV-2 infection. To be noted, we confirmed that all drugs lack potent inhibitory activity on the viral PLpro and 3CLpro (Supplementary Fig. S14), and also on human furin and TMPRSS2 (Supplementary Fig. S15) under the highest tested concentrations used in this infection study, indicating that the antiviral activities of these compounds are most likely due to the CTSL-specific inhibition.

Thirdly, we further validated the antiviral effects of the compounds in an ex vivo lung culture system. Lung tissues from human ACE2 (hACE2)-transgenic mice or a human donor were infected with the live SARS-CoV-2 virus. First, tissues were harvested (without adding drugs) at 2 h post-infection (hpi) and 48 hpi to examine the system. The viral RNA copies from tissues harvested at 48 hpi were significantly higher than those from 2 hpi, indicating that the tissues were successfully infected (Fig. 4c). Then, lung tissues were infected and treated with the selected compounds, with molnupiravir as a control. Three CTSL inhibitors (E64d, Z-FY-CHO, and K777) were chosen for their lower EC₅₀ and safety for in vivo studies¹². All compounds were used in the dose of double EC₉₀ concentrations assessed from Vero E6 cells⁴¹ (10 μM for molnupiravir⁴², 4 μM for E64d, 5 μM for Z-FY-CHO, and 0.4 μM for K777). After 48 h, tissues were harvested and the viral RNA copies were quantified. All CTSL inhibitors potently antagonized viral replication in human and mouse lung tissues, even with stronger effects than molnupiravir (Fig. 4c).

Finally, we investigated the in vivo antiviral effects of CTSL inhibitors in hACE2 mice, which are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection⁴³. We selected two compounds, E64d and Z-FY-CHO, which have been validated to be safe for in vivo studies^12,44. E64d and Z-FY-CHO were administered in prophylactic and therapeutic regimens, and mice were treated at appropriate doses according to previous studies^12,44. Each mouse was infected with 106 plaque-forming units (PFU) SARS-CoV-2 at 0 days post-infection (dpi) by intranasal instillation. Tissue samples were collected at 4 dpi (Fig. 5a), when the viral load peaked, and exhibited obvious histopathological changes. Both compounds significantly decreased the number of viral RNA copies in lung tissues by ~1–4 log10, with undetectable (below the lower limit of detection, LOD) viral loads in lung tissues from two mice treated with Z-FY-CHO and four mice treated with E64d (Fig. 5b). Both drugs also significantly decreased the viral load in the nasal turbinate (Fig. 5b). Histological analysis of the lungs showed that vehicle-treated mice exhibited moderate pathological changes, as evidenced by the large areas of alveolar septal thickening, inflammatory cell infiltration and bronchiolar epithelial cell degeneration. In contrast, the lungs of E64d- and Z-FY-CHO-treated mice exhibited improved morphology and less infiltration (Fig. 5c, d). Taken together, these results indicated that CTSL inhibitors efficiently block SARS-CoV-2 infection both in vitro and in vivo and are resistant to viral mutational escape.

**Fig. 5: CTSL inhibitors prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in vivo.**

Discussion

In this study, we identified two specific cleavage sites of CTSL in the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, named CS-1 and CS-2. Both sites are located in the flexible loop regions within S1 subunit, while CS-1 is in the NTD and CS-2 is in the CTD near the S1/S2 furin cleavage site. Both sites are highly conserved among all SARS-CoV-2 variants, including the most recently emerging variants. Our structural studies proved that CTSL cleavage can greatly enhance S protein dynamics with an increased proportion of activated states ready for receptor-binding and membrane fusion. The viral infection assay using the PsV system proved that CTSL cleavage, especially cleavage at CS-2, is an essential step in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, CTSL-specific inhibitors not only blocked the infection of PsV/live virus in cells but also reduced the infection rate of live virus significantly ex vivo and in vivo. Our results suggested CTSL cleavage is an important process during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Based on our structural and functional study, we proposed a possible model for the CTSL-mediated SARS-CoV-2 infection process (Fig. 6). When the viral S protein encounters activated CTSL, the cleavage occurs at both CS-1 and CS-2 sites on the S protein. Then dynamics of the RBD and NTD are increased to facilitate the activation of S protein and promote ACE2 binding. Next, the cleavage at CS-2 site separates S1 and S2 domains to expose S2 ready for membrane fusion and then complete the infection process. Considering the localization and activity characteristics of CTSL, these cleavage reactions are most likely to occur in the endosomes.

**Fig. 6: Proposed mechanism by which CTSL promotes SARS-CoV-2 infection.**

Previous studies indicated that SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 were all capable of using both endosomal and membrane fusion routes to enter the cell^13,45. TMPRSS2 appears to be one of the major proteases for priming S for entry via the plasma membrane, whereas CTSL performs the priming function during entry through the endosome in vitro^13,45. In support of this view, endosomal acidification inhibitors have been shown to effectively block the entry of SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 by preventing the activation of CTSL^29,45. Cell culture studies showed that TMPRSS2 was more significantly associated with the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into Calu-3 cells¹³, while the endosomal entry route might be dominant for SARS-CoV-2 into Vero cells⁴⁶. Therefore, the flexibility of protease usage and entry pathway seems to be a consistent strategy for coronavirus use, and in some cases, its role depends on cell type. In patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the most susceptible organ is the lung, which contains many kinds of cell type. In this study, we further validated the antiviral effects of the CTSL inhibitors in human lung tissue ex vivo.

In addition, SARS-CoV-2 attachment cofactors can facilitate SARS-CoV-2 S binding to ACE2. Subsequently, the cleavage of cell surface proteases can lead to cell membrane fusion²³. Our study indicates that CTSL can attach S protein at CS-1 site, implying that may CTSL serve as SARS-CoV-2 attachment cofactor to facilitate SARS-CoV-2 S binding to ACE2.

It is well known that furin and TMPRSS2 are important human enzymes that are employed by SARS-CoV-2 during the infection process. The expression of TMPRSS2 has been confirmed within COVID-19 relevant lung cell types¹⁹ and its role in mediating SARS-CoV-2 infection has been proved¹³. TMPRSS2 also has been reported to mediate ACE2 activation in SARS-CoV-1 infection⁴⁷. Here, we further identified that SARS-CoV-2 can utilize human CTSL to assist infection independent of furin. Therefore, all these human enzymes, including CTSL, TMPRSS2, and furin, could be involved in the viral infection process, and are most likely to play complementary or compensatory roles in different human tissues. Drugs targeting these human enzymes should be paid more attention to.

Moreover, for the drugs that do not target the virus directly, they would be less easily escaped by the SARS-CoV-2 variants. As expected, we found that the CTSL-specific inhibitors can nearly completely prevent infection of SARS-CoV-2 variant PsVs and reduce infection of live SARS-CoV-2 by 103–104-fold in Vero E6 cells. More importantly, CTSL-specific inhibitors can effectively prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in hACE2-transgenic mice. These results have provided important evidence for the development of next-generation broad-spectrum drugs against SARS-CoV-2.

In our study, we found that both CTSL cleavage sites (CS-1 and CS-2) possess extra high sequence conservations among SARS-CoV-2 variants, indicating their importance for the viral life cycle. It may be inferred that those two cleavage sites cannot be easily mutated in the live SARS-CoV-2 variants, or that the variant with mutations in those two sites might have weak infectivity, which is indicated in our experiments that the mutations of these two sites, especially CS-2 site, largely impaired the infectivity of the virus. Therefore, the development of specific drugs or vaccines targeting CS-1 and CS-2 sites would be a new strategy to prevent SARS-CoV-2. If these sites are occupied by drugs or antibodies which can block CTSL cleavage, the viral infection could be effectively inhibited. This approach would be much safer than the strategy of using compounds to inhibit the activity of multiple human proteases.

In conclusion, the high mutation rate of SARS-CoV-2 often leads to viral escape from neutralizing antibodies or vaccines. An understanding of the precise mechanisms underlying SARS-CoV-2 infection is urgently needed to facilitate the development of broad-spectrum antiviral drugs or vaccines with increased resistance to viral mutations. Our study shows that CTSL and its new cleavage sites at the SARS-CoV-2 S protein are the crucial new targets for the future development of anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapy.

Materials and methods

Protein expression and purification

The S_2P protein was purified as previously reported²⁴. Briefly, the prefusion S ectodomain, the mammalian codon-optimized gene coding SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan-Hu-1 strain, GenBank ID: MN908947.3) S glycoprotein ectodomain (residues M1–Q1208) with proline substitutions at K986 and V987, a “GSAS” substitution at the furin cleavage site (R682 to R685), a C-terminal thrombin tag, a T4 fibritin trimerization motif and a 6× HisTag was synthesized and cloned. To express 4-Gly-mutant S protein, residues W258, T259, V635, and Y636 were substituted into glycine. These expression vectors were used to transiently transfect Expi293 cells and purified by using cOmpleteHis-Tag Purification Resin to capture the target protein. The protein was then subjected to additional purification by size-exclusion chromatography using Superdex 200 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) in PBS.

The S_R protein with only an arginine left at the furin cleavage site (P681–R685) was constructed, expressed, and purified as previously described³⁰. Briefly, 300 μg of plasmid was incubated with 810 μg of polyethylenimine for 10 min, and then transfected into 300 mL of 293 F cells at 2.7 million/mL. The transfected cells were cultured at 33 °C. After 4 days, cell culture supernatant was collected and then loaded onto 5 mL Hitrap Talon Cobalt column. The column was washed with 100 mL buffer A (25 mM phosphate pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole) and eluted with 100 mL 0–100% linear gradient of buffer B (25 mM phosphate pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 200 mM imidazole). After that, the protein was concentrated and buffer exchanged into PBS by a 100 kDa MWCO ultra centrifugal filter (Millipore).

CTSL treatment

Recombinant CTSL (Novoprotein) was used to cleave SARS-CoV-2 S_2P protein. Purified SARS-CoV-2 S protein was incubated with CTSL (2–8 μg/mL as indicated and 8 μg/mL for cryo-EM sample preparation) in the presence of 100 mM NaAC, 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), pH 5.5 for 24 h at 25 °C. CTSL was preactivated at 30 °C for 1 min before use. The resulting protein was then subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and stained by coomassie blue or silver staining methods as indicated. For cryo-EM sample preparation, the S_R protein was firstly cleaved by TEV enzyme in a mass ratio at 10:1 for 16 h at 25 °C, then treated with CTSL in pH 5.5 for 24 h at 25 °C.

Sequence analysis

Sequence alignments were performed using the CLUSTALW online tool (https://www.genome.jp/tools-bin/clustalw). The representative variant sequence of each SARS-CoV-2 PANGO lineage was obtained from Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) database: B.1.1.529 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_6900143), B.1.617 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_1544002), P.1 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_1164984), B.1.351 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_935042), B.1.1.7 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_1257795), B.1.621 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_6864938), C.37 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_6794513), AY.4.2 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_6905104), C.36 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_6866297), C.1.2 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_6906407), B.1.427 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_1221570), B.1.1.318 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_6661876), B.1.429 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_1160035), B.1.640 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_6887009), B.1.525 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_6903493), P.3 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_6756120), B.1.617.1 (GISAID: EPI_ISL_6877952). In addition, the following sequences information were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database: SARS-CoV BJ01 (GenBank: AAP30030.1), MERS-CoV (GenBank: QBM11748.1), HCoV NL63 (GenBank: APF29063.1), HcoV 229E (GenBank: AWH62679.1), HcoV OC43 (GenBank: AIX10763.1), HcoV HKU1 (GenBank: AMN88694.1).

N-terminal Edman sequencing and LC-MS/MS analysis

CTSL-treated SARS-CoV-2 S protein was resolved on an SDS-PAGE gel. The protein was transferred to PVDF membrane before Edman sequencing. Each protein band was excised individually. The sequence of the first 10 amino acids for each band was determined by Edman sequencing using ABI Procise-cLC machine. LC-MS/MS analysis of excised bands was performed at Laboratory of Proteomics, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Cryo-EM sample preparation and data collection

For each grid, 3 μL of purified protein solution of CTSL-treated or untreated SARS-CoV-2 S proteins were applied to newly glow-discharged holy carbon film grids (R1.2/1.3, 200 meshes, Au, Quantifoil, Germany) or holy Ni-Ti film grids⁴⁸ (R1.2/1.3, 300 meshes, Au, Zhenjiang Lehua Electronic Technology Co., LTD, China). Then the grid was blotted and vitrified by plunge freezing into liquid ethane using Vitrobot Mark IV (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at 4 °C and 100% humidity. All movies were collected on a Titan Krios G2 TEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) operated at 300 KV on EF-TEM mode with nominal magnification set to be ×105,000, resulting in a calibrated physical pixel size of 1.36 Å on a specimen level. The total dose was set to be 60 e−/Å², with an exposure time of 15 s. The movies were acquired by Gatan K2 Summit DDD detector (Gatan Company, USA) equipped with a GIF Quantum energy filter, with a silt width of 20 eV, operated in super-resolution mode, resulting in a pixel size of 0.68 Å for output super-resolution movies. SerialEM⁴⁹ with in-house scripts were used for data collection⁵⁰, defocus values for either samples were set between −1.0 and −2.0 μm.

Image processing

Image processing steps were performed using RELION^51,52 and cryoSPARC⁵³. The output super-resolution movies were first subjected to motion correction using MotionCor2⁵⁴, with the binning level of 2 in Fourier space, and dose weighting was also performed during the process. Contrast transfer function (CTF) parameters estimation were performed using Gctf⁵⁵. Gautomatch (https://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/kzhang/Gautomatch/) was used to pick all particles from raw micrographs. Then good particles were extracted and sorted by 2D classification. After 2D classification, one round of 3D classification was performed to investigate different populations of S proteins. To prevent any model bias, the previously reported cryo-EM structure of SARS-CoV-2 S (Protein Data Bank, PDB entry 6VXX) lowpass filtered to 60 Å was used as the initial reference and no additional symmetry was imposed throughout the initial image processing pipeline. Then the well-aligned classes with clear secondary structure features were selected separately for subsequent image processing, including auto-refinement, Bayesian polishing, CTF refinement, and no-alignment 3D classification. All these steps were performed in RELION. For the final round of refinement, the non-uniform (NU) refinement in cryoSPARC was performed to refine the final maps to a higher resolution.

Model building and refinement

All the cryo-EM maps are improved by density modification procedures before model building⁵⁶. To build the atomic model of CTSL-treated or untreated SARS-CoV-2 S structures, the reported cryo-EM structure of SARS-CoV-2 S (PDB entry 6VXX & 6VYB)²² was used as an initial model. We were able to trace most regions with side chains using COOT⁵⁷. The built model was further refined in real space using Phenix⁵⁸. All figures were created by Pymol⁵⁹, UCSF Chimera⁶⁰, and UCSF ChimeraX⁶¹. The parameters for data collection and structure determination are summarized in Supplementary Table S2. The overall model building quality is shown in Supplementary Videos S1–S4.

BLI

The BLI assay was performed at 30 °C on the Octet RED96 System (ForteBio) with 100 mM NaAC, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT, pH 5.5 and 0.02% Tween-20 as running buffer. Purified human IgG Fc-hACE2 (Novoprotein) was loaded for 300 s onto Anti-Human IgG Fc Capture (AHC) biosensors (ForteBio). To measure the binding affinity between ACE2 and S variants, the biosensors were then incubated with various concentrations of the purified WT S_2P and CS mutant (CS-1M + 2 M) S_2P proteins for 90 s, followed by 180 s of dissociation. Both WT and CS mutant S_2P proteins have proline substitutions at K986 and V987 and a “GSAS” substitution at the furin cleavage site. For the CTSL cleavage activation assay, the biosensors were incubated for 180 s with various concentrations of S_R before and after CTSL treatment, followed by 200 s of dissociation. The data were analyzed using the software supplied by the manufacturer.

Cell culture

The Huh7 (Homo sapiens, liver), 293T-hACE2 (293 T cells stably expressed, Homo sapiens, embryonic kidney), Vero (Cercopithecus aethiops, kidney), VeroE6 (Cercopithecus aethiops, kidney), and LLC-MK2 (Macaca mulatta, kidney) cells were maintained in high glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA), 100 units/mL Penicillin-Streptomycin (Gibco). All the cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 95% air and 5% CO₂.

Experimental mice

The study used human ACE2-transgenic mice, a mouse model expressing hACE2 generated by using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) knock-in technology as previously reported⁴³. The hACE2 mice used in this manuscript were 17-week-old female C57BL/6 mice, with the body weight between 22 g. All animal protocols were approved by the Ethical Review Committee at the Institute of Zoology, Capital Medical University, China.

SARS-CoV-2-S plasmids and site-directed mutagenesis

SARS-CoV-2-S plasmid was constructed by inserted the codon-optimized S gene of SARS-CoV-2 (GenBank: MN_908947) into pcDNA3.1 as previously described⁶. For the site-directed mutagenesis, 15–20 nucleotides before and after the target mutation site were selected as forward primers, while the reverse complementary sequences were selected as reverse primers. Following site-directed mutagenesis PCR, the template chain was digested using DpnI restriction endonuclease (NEB, USA). The PCR product was transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells; single clones were selected and then sequenced.

Production and quantification of PsVs

PsVs incorporated with S protein from either SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2, or mutants were constructed using a procedure described by us previously. For this VSV-based PsV system, the backbone was provided by VSV-G pseudotyped virus (G*ΔG-VSV) that packages expression cassettes for firefly luciferase instead of VSV-G in the VSV genome. For quantification of PsV, viral RNA was extracted by using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat. No. 52906, QIAGEN), and the reverse transcription was performed with RevertAidTM First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas K1622) according to the manufacturer. The real-time qPCR was then performed on the LightCycler® 96 Real-Time PCR System (Roche) using SYBR Green I Master Mix reagent (Roche). The P protein gene of VSV virus was quantified and the viral copy number calculated accordingly. The primers were: forward-TCTCGTCTGGATCAGGCGG; reverse-TGCTCTTCCACTCCATCCTCTTGG. All PsVs were normalized to the same amount as previously described⁶.

Western blot analysis

7 mL of SARS-CoV-2 PsVs with a titre of 1.86 × 105 50% tissue culture infectious dose/mL (TCID₅₀/mL) were pelleted through a 25% sucrose cushion by ultra-centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 3 h. The layer of supernatant was discarded. The pellet was collected and subjected to western blot analysis as previously described⁶², and detected by anti-S1 mice serum, VSV-M antibody (KeraFast, Cat. No. EB0011), anti-GAPDH antibody (Sigma), and anti-His antibody (Sigma).

PsV infection assay

Before infection, the 96-well plates were seeded with cells adjusted to 2 × 105 cells/mL. Then, 100 μL of the normalized PsV with indicated dilution fold was added to wells in 96-well cell culture plate. After 24 h incubation at 37 °C, the activities of firefly luciferase were measured on cell lysates using luciferase substrate (PerkinElmer, BRITELITE PLUS 100 mL KIT, Cat. No. 6066761) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Luciferase activity was measured using a luminometer (Promega).

Overexpression and knockdown of CTSL

Overexpression and knockdown of CTSL gene in Huh7 cells were described previously¹². Briefly, for CTSL knockdown, Huh7 cells were plated in 48-well plates, and transfected with indicated concentrations of siRNAs against homo CTSL mRNA (si-CTSL) or 50 nM negative control siRNA (scramble) using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For CTSL overexpression, Huh7 cells were plated in 48-well plates and transfected with indicated concentrations of human CTSL expression plasmid (GenBank: NM_001912, Vigenebio) or 0.2 μg control plasmid. The overexpression and knockdown efficiencies were validated in both mRNA and protein levels by us previously¹². Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the medium was replaced with a fresh medium. Then the cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 or mutant PsV (1.3 × 104 TCID₅₀/mL) and cultured for another 24 h before firefly luciferase activity analysis. siRNA sequences were provided in Supplementary Table S3.

Syncytium-formation assay

Syncytium-formation assay was performed as previously described by us¹². Briefly, Huh7 cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected with SARS-CoV-2-S or mutant protein expression plasmids using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The transfection solutions were changed to a standard culture medium 4–6 h post-transfection and cells incubated for an additional 6–8 h. Next, cells were treated in the absence (PBS, pH = 5.8) or presence of 2 or 4 μg/mL CTSL (Novoprotein) (in PBS, pH = 5.8) for 20 min at 37 °C. Then, the solutions were changed to a standard culture medium, and the cells further incubated for 10–16 h. The pictures were captured under bright-field microscopy (Olympus).

Quantification of syncytium formation

Huh7 target cells were seeded in 48-well plate at 10%–20% confluency and transfected with ESR1 expression plasmid. Huh7 effector cells were seeded in a six-well dish at 50%–70% confluency and transfected with ERE-Luciferase reporter plasmid as well as expression plasmid for WT or mutant SARS-CoV-2-S or empty plasmid (1:2 ratio). At 24 h post-transfection, effector cells were detached by resuspending and added to the target cells at 1:1 ratio. Where indicated, the medium was changed by CTSL, trypsin or PBS 2 h after the mixture and the reaction was stopped after 20 min by adding 500 μL culture medium. Luciferase activity was analyzed after 20–30 h.

Analysis of CTSL, Furin, TMPRSS2, viral 3CLpro, and PLpro activity

The protease inhibition by drugs was measured using different substrates: Ac-FR-AFC (Abcam, Cat. No. ab157769) for CTSL (Novoprotein), BOC-QAR-AMC (Absin, Cat. No. abs45133013) for TMPRSS2 (CUSABIO), MCA-AVLQSGFR-Lys (Dnp)-Lys-NH₂ (Beyotime, Cat. No. P0315S) for 3CLpro (Novoprotein), and Z-RLRGG-AMC (TGpeptide) for PLpro (Sino Biological). Furin activity was measured using a commercial kit (AnaSpec, Cat. No. AS-72256). The protease activity was measured by a spectrophotometer (Promega) at the appropriate wavelength.

SARS-CoV-2 virus

All experiments with infectious SARS-CoV-2 were performed in the biosafety level 4 and animal biosafety level 4 facilities in the Harbin Veterinary Research Institute (HVRI) of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), which is approved by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China.

SARS-CoV-2 strain SARS-CoV-2/HRB25/human/2020/CHN (HRB25, GISAID: EPI_ISL_467430)⁶³ was isolated from a patient in Vero E6 cells. Viral stocks were prepared in VeroE6 cells with DMEM containing 5% FBS. Viruses were harvested and the titers were determined by means of plaque assay in Vero E6 cells⁶⁴.

SARS-CoV-2 infection assay in vitro

Vero E6 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate and grown overnight. Then the cells were pretreated with different concentrations of each compound for 16 h and infected with SARS-CoV-2 at a MOI of 0.01. After 24 h, the cell supernatants were collected to extract viral RNA and subjected to Real-Time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis. The N gene-specific primers (forward, 5′-GGGGAACTTCTCCTGCTAGAAT-3′; reverse, 5′-CAGACATTTTGCTCTCAAGCTG-3′) and probe (5′-FAM-TTGCTGCTGCTTGACAGATTTAMRA-3′) were utilized according to the information provided by the National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, China (http://nmdc.cn/nCoV). The EC₅₀ values were calculated by using a dose-response model in GraphPad Prism 8.0 software. The cell viability was determined by using the cell counting kit (CCK) (TransGen Biotech) according to the manufacture.

SARS-CoV-2 infection assay using human lung tissues and hACE2 mice lung tissues ex vivo

The ex vivo human lung tissue culture and virus infection experiment was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University (TRECKY2021-202). The informed consent was obtained from the participant. Fresh normal human lung tissue was obtained from a patient undergoing resection of lung tumor. Fresh hACE2 mice lung tissue was obtained from the hACE2 mice. Lung tissue was cut into 2–3 mm³ cubes and subsequently infected by a SARS-CoV-2 inoculum of 1 × 106 TCID₅₀/mL for 2 h at 37 °C. After inoculation, the inoculum was removed, and the specimens were washed three times with PBS. Tissue cubes were maintained in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with different concentrations of the indicated drugs for an additional 48 h. Then the tissues were harvested and the viral RNAs copies were measured by RT-qPCR.

SARS-CoV-2 infection assay in vivo

Prophylactic treatment was given on –2, –1, 0, 1, 2, and 3 dpi, while therapeutic regimen was given on 0, 1, 2, and 3 dpi. The mice were infected at 0 dpi with 106 PFU of SARS-CoV-2 by intranasal instillation. Lung and nasal turbinate tissues were collected at 4 dpi. The viral RNAs copies from tissues were measured by RT-qPCR. Tissue pathology of infected mice was examined by the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical assays as described previously^64,65. Semiquantitative histological scoring of each lung tissue was performed by grading the severity of bronchiolar epithelial cell damage (0–10), alveolar damage (0–10), and inflammatory cell infiltration in blood vessels and bronchioles (0–10) and summing these scores to calculate the total score. Normal = 0, indeterminate = 1–2, mild = 3–4, moderate = 5–7, severe = 8–10.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted with the software GraphPad Prism version 7.0 Data are presented as means ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined using unpaired Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test if n < 9, or one-way ANOVA as appropriate.

Data availability

The Electron Microscopy Database (EMD) accession codes of untreated S-closed state, CTSL-treated S-closed state, S-1R-weak state, S-1R-open state are EMD-32490, EMD-32491, EMD-32492, and EMD-32493, respectively. The structural models of untreated S-closed state, CTSL-treated S-closed state, S-1R-weak state, S-1R-open state were deposited to the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with accession code of 7WGV, 7WGX, 7WGY, and 7WGZ, respectively. The other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Sewell, H. F., Agius, R. M., Kendrick, D. & Stewart, M. Vaccines, convalescent plasma, and monoclonal antibodies for covid-19. BMJ 370, m2722 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Lythgoe, M. P. & Middleton, P. Ongoing clinical trials for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 41, 363–382 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Owen, D. R. et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 M(pro) inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 374, 1586–1593 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shin, D. et al. Papain-like protease regulates SARS-CoV-2 viral spread and innate immunity. Nature 587, 657–662 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dejnirattisai, W. et al. Antibody evasion by the P.1 strain of SARS-CoV-2. Cell 184, 2939–2954 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, Q. et al. The impact of mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike on viral infectivity and antigenicity. Cell 182, 1284–1294.e9 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tegally, H. et al. Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa. Nature 592, 438–443 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ferrante, L. et al. Brazil’s policies condemn Amazonia to a second wave of COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 1315 (2020).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Murray, C. J. L. & Piot, P. The potential future of the COVID-19 pandemic: will SARS-CoV-2 become a recurrent seasonal infection? JAMA 325, 1249–1250 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Abdool Karim, S. S. & de Oliveira, T. New SARS-CoV-2 variants—clinical, public health, and vaccine implications. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1866–1868 (2021).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Merck. Merck and Ridgeback Biotherapeutics Provide Update on Results from MOVe-OUT Study of Molnupiravir, an Investigational Oral Antiviral Medicine, in At Risk Adults With Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19. https://www.merck.com/news/merck-and-ridgeback-biotherapeutics-provide-update-on-results-from-move-out-study-of-molnupiravir-an-investigational-oral-antiviral-medicine-in-at-risk-adults-with-mild-to-moderate-covid-19/ (2021).
Zhao, M. M. et al. Cathepsin L plays a key role in SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans and humanized mice and is a promising target for new drug development. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 6, 134 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181, 271–280 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zang, R. et al. TMPRSS2 and TMPRSS4 promote SARS-CoV-2 infection of human small intestinal enterocytes. Sci. Immunol. 5, eabc3582 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Millet, J. K. & Whittaker, G. R. Host cell proteases: critical determinants of coronavirus tropism and pathogenesis. Virus Res. 202, 120–134 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
The Human Protein Atlas. Subcellular CTSL expression in human cells. https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000135047-CTSL/subcellular#human (2022).
The Human Protein Atlas. CTSL protein expression in human tissues. https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000135047-CTSL/tissue/ (2022).
Gupta, A. et al. Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 1017–1032 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lukassen, S. et al. SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are primarily expressed in bronchial transient secretory cells. EMBO J. 39, e105114 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Carvalho, T. Extrapulmonary SARS-CoV-2 manifestations. Nat. Med. 26, 1806 (2020).
PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. COVID-19 receptor and malignant cancers: association of CTSL expression with susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 18, 2362–2371 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Walls, A. C. et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181, 281–292.e6 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shang, J. et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11727–11734 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wrapp, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367, 1260–1263 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Meyer, B. et al. Characterising proteolysis during SARS-CoV-2 infection identifies viral cleavage sites and cellular targets with therapeutic potential. Nat. Commun. 12, 5553 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Biniossek, M. L., Nagler, D. K., Becker-Pauly, C. & Schilling, O. Proteomic identification of protease cleavage sites characterizes prime and non-prime specificity of cysteine cathepsins B, L, and S. J. Proteome Res. 10, 5363–5373 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xia, S. et al. Structure-based evidence for the enhanced transmissibility of the dominant SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variant (Alpha). Cell Discov. 7, 109 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu, B., Guo, H., Zhou, P. & Shi, Z. L. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 141–154 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Simmons, G. et al. Inhibitors of cathepsin L prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11876–11881 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xiong, X. et al. A thermostable, closed SARS-CoV-2 spike protein trimer. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 934–941 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wrobel, A. G. et al. SARS-CoV-2 and bat RaTG13 spike glycoprotein structures inform on virus evolution and furin-cleavage effects. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 763–767 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qu, K., Xiong, X., Ciazynska, K. A., Carter, A. P. & Briggs, J. A. G. Structures and function of locked conformations of SARS-CoV-2 spike. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.10.434733v1 (2021).
Cai, Y. et al. Distinct conformational states of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Science 369, 1586–1592 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Toelzer, C. et al. Free fatty acid binding pocket in the locked structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Science 370, 725–730 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Benton, D. J. et al. Receptor binding and priming of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 for membrane fusion. Nature 588, 327–330 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, Q. et al. SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 variants lack higher infectivity but do have immune escape. Cell 184, 2362–2371.e9 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Baggen, J., Vanstreels, E., Jansen, S. & Daelemans, D. Cellular host factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 1219–1232 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bussani, R. et al. Persistence of viral RNA, pneumocyte syncytia and thrombosis are hallmarks of advanced COVID-19 pathology. EBioMedicine 61, 103104 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ou, X. et al. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 11, 1620 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lu, L. et al. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant by sera from BNT162b2 or Coronavac vaccine recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. ciab1041 https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab1041 (2021).
Riva, L. et al. Discovery of SARS-CoV-2 antiviral drugs through large-scale compound repurposing. Nature 586, 113–119 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cox, R. M., Wolf, J. D. & Plemper, R. K. Therapeutically administered ribonucleoside analogue MK-4482/EIDD-2801 blocks SARS-CoV-2 transmission in ferrets. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 11–18 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sun, S. H. et al. A mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis. Cell Host Microbe 28, 124–133.e4 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Woo, J. T. et al. Suppressive effect of N-(benzyloxycarbonyl)-L-phenylalanyl-L-tyrosinal on bone resorption in vitro and in vivo. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 300, 131–135 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. SARS coronavirus entry into host cells through a novel clathrin- and caveolae-independent endocytic pathway. Cell Res. 18, 290–301 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Martin-Sancho, L. et al. Functional landscape of SARS-CoV-2 cellular restriction. Mol. Cell 81, 2656–2668.e8 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Heurich, A. et al. TMPRSS2 and ADAM17 cleave ACE2 differentially and only proteolysis by TMPRSS2 augments entry driven by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein. J. Virol. 88, 1293–1307 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Huang, X. et al. Amorphous nickel titanium alloy film: a new choice for cryo electron microscopy sample preparation. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 156, 3–13 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. N. SerialEM: a program for automated tilt series acquisition on Tecnai microscopes using prediction of specimen position. Microsc. Microanalysis 9, 1182–1183 (2003).
Article Google Scholar
Wu, C., Huang, X., Cheng, J., Zhu, D. & Zhang, X. High-quality, high-throughput cryo-electron microscopy data collection via beam tilt and astigmatism-free beam-image shift. J. Struct. Biol. 208, 107396 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Scheres, S. H. W. RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kimanius, D., Forsberg, B. O., Scheres, S. H. & Lindahl, E. Accelerated cryo-EM structure determination with parallelisation using GPUs in RELION-2. elife 5, e18722 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Terwilliger, T. C., Ludtke, S. J., Read, R. J., Adams, P. D. & Afonine, P. V. Improvement of cryo-EM maps by density modification. Nat. Methods 17, 923–927 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schrodinger, L. L. C. https://pymol.org/2/. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8. (2015).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, M. M. et al. Berberine is an insulin secretagogue targeting the KCNH6 potassium channel. Nat. Commun. 12, 5616 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wu, S. et al. A single dose of an adenovirus-vectored vaccine provides protection against SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Nat. Commun. 11, 4081 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shi, J. et al. Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS-coronavirus 2. Science 368, 1016–1020 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. Mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 replicates efficiently in the upper and lower respiratory tract of BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice. Protein Cell 11, 776–782 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81930019), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0909600) and the Scientific Project of Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (D171100002817005), Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support (ZYLX201823) to J.-K.Y. This work was equally supported by grants from Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB37040102), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0504700), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31925026). This work was also supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2018YFA0901102 and 2019YFA0904101), Natural Science Fund of Guangdong Province (2021A1515011289 to X.X.), and start-up grants from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Bioland Laboratory (GRMH-GL). We thank the patient who donated his/her lung tissues. We thank Lei Yu, Baoxun Zhang, Xin Du from the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, for their helps in obtaining the lung tissues. We thank Jianping Feng (J.K.Y. lab), Ping Shan and Ruigang Su (F.S. lab) for their assistance in lab management. We thank Jifeng Wang and Lili Niu (Laboratory of Proteomics, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for helping with LC-MS/MS and data analysis. We would be grateful to Yuanyuan Chen, Zhenwei Yang (Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for technical help with BLI experiments. All the cryo-EM work were performed at Center for Biological Imaging (CBI, http://cbi.ibp.ac.cn), Core Facilities for Protein Science at Institute of Biophysics (IBP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). We would also like to thank B. Zhu, X. Huang, X. Li, T. Niu, G. Ji, D. Fan, and other staff members from CBI for their help in data collection.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Miao-Miao Zhao, Yun Zhu, Li Zhang, Gongxun Zhong

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Diabetes Institute, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Miao-Miao Zhao, Jing Lu, Qiong He, Ming-Jia Li, Ru-Xuan Zhao, Hao Wang & Jin-Kui Yang
National Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Yun Zhu, Linhua Tai, Guoliang Yin & Fei Sun
Division of HIV/AIDS and Sex-Transmitted Virus Vaccines, Institute for Biological Product Control, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC), Beijing, China
Li Zhang, Shuo Liu, Weijin Huang & Youchun Wang
State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China
Gongxun Zhong, Lei Shuai, Zhiyuan Wen, Chong Wang, Xijun He & Zhigao Bu
National High Containment Laboratory for Animal Diseases Control and Prevention, Harbin, China
Gongxun Zhong, Lei Shuai, Zhiyuan Wen, Xijun He & Zhigao Bu
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Linhua Tai, Guoliang Yin & Fei Sun
Division of Animal Model Research, Institute for Laboratory Animal Resources, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China
Changfa Fan
Bioland Laboratory, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Qiuluan Chen, Banghui Liu, Xiaoli Xiong & Fei Sun
The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease (SKLRD), Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Qiuluan Chen, Banghui Liu & Xiaoli Xiong
Center for Biological Imaging, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Fei Sun

Authors

Miao-Miao Zhao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yun Zhu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Li Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Gongxun Zhong
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Linhua Tai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Shuo Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Guoliang Yin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jing Lu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Qiong He
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ming-Jia Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ru-Xuan Zhao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hao Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Weijin Huang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Changfa Fan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lei Shuai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhiyuan Wen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Chong Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xijun He
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Qiuluan Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Banghui Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiaoli Xiong
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhigao Bu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Youchun Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Fei Sun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jin-Kui Yang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.-K.Y. conceived the idea for the study, supported the study, designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. M.-M.Z. and Y.Z. designed and performed the experiments and wrote the first version of the manuscript. L.Z. and G.Z. designed and performed the experiments. L.T., S.L., G.Y., W.H., Q.H., M.-J.L., J.L., R.-X.Z., H.W., C.F., L.S., Z.W., C.W., X.H., Q.C., and B.L. participated in performing the experiments. F.S., Y.W., Z.B., and X.X. helped with the interpretation of the results, design of experiments, part of the support for the study, and proofreading of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhigao Bu, Youchun Wang, Fei Sun or Jin-Kui Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Video S1

Supplementary Video S2

Supplementary Video S3

Supplementary Video S4

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, MM., Zhu, Y., Zhang, L. et al. Novel cleavage sites identified in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reveal mechanism for cathepsin L-facilitated viral infection and treatment strategies. Cell Discov 8, 53 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-022-00419-w

Download citation

Received: 06 April 2022
Accepted: 07 May 2022
Published: 06 June 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-022-00419-w

This article is cited by

Roles of host proteases in the entry of SARS-CoV-2
- Alexandria Zabiegala
- Yunjeong Kim
- Kyeong-Ok Chang
Animal Diseases (2023)
Coffee as a dietary strategy to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection
- Chen-Shiou Wu
- Yi-Chuan Li
- Mien-Chie Hung
Cell & Bioscience (2023)
Proteomic data and structure analysis combined reveal interplay of structural rigidity and flexibility on selectivity of cysteine cathepsins
- Livija Tušar
- Jure Loboda
- Dušan Turk
Communications Biology (2023)
Cooperative and structural relationships of the trimeric Spike with infectivity and antibody escape of the strains Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (BA.2, BA.5, and BQ.1)
- Anacleto Silva de Souza
- Robson Francisco de Souza
- Cristiane Rodrigues Guzzo
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design (2023)
Small molecules in the treatment of COVID-19
- Sibei Lei
- Xiaohua Chen
- Ke Men
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2022)