Abstract
During the development of the vertebrate nervous system, 50% of the nerve cells undergo apoptosis shortly after formation. This process is important for sculpting tissue during morphogenesis and removing transiently functional cells that are no longer needed, ensuring the appropriate number of neurons in each region. Dysregulation of neuronal apoptosis can lead to neurodegenerative diseases. However, the molecular events involved in activating and regulating the neuronal apoptosis program are not fully understood. In this study, we identified several RB1 mutations in patients with neurodegenerative diseases. Then, we used a zebrafish model to investigate the role of Rb1 in neuronal apoptosis. We showed that Rb1-deficient mutants exhibit a significant hindbrain neuronal apoptosis, resulting in increased microglia infiltration. We further revealed that the apoptotic neurons in Rb1-deficient zebrafish were post-mitotic neurons, and Rb1 inhibits the apoptosis of these neurons by regulating bcl2/caspase through binding to Kmt5b. Moreover, using this zebrafish mutant, we verified the pathogenicity of the R621S and L819V mutations of human RB1 in neuronal apoptosis. Collectively, our data indicate that the Rb1-Kmt5b-caspase/bcl2 axis is crucial for protecting post-mitotic neurons from apoptosis and provides an explanation for the pathogenesis of clinically relevant mutations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The neuroectoderm of the neural plate gives rise to the neuroepithelial cells (NECs, also called neural stem cells) of the neural tube, thus forming the neural precursors that will differentiate into various neurons and glia that comprise the central nervous system (CNS) [1, 2]. Neural stem/precursor cells (NSPCs) are located in the ventricular zone closest to the lumen and can rapidly proliferate to generate excess neural cells during early embryo neurogenesis [3]. Subsequently, approximately 50% of neural cells are cleared by apoptosis before the nervous system matures [4]. This apoptosis process is important for maintaining normal tissue-size homeostasis, removing transiently functional cells that are no longer needed, and ensuring that each brain area has an appropriate number of neurons and glial cells [5, 6]. However, once neurons become mature, their apoptotic capacity is restricted, allowing them to persist in a healthy and functional state throughout life [7]. In certain pathological contexts, the apoptotic pathway of mature neurons can be reactivated [7].
Neurodegenerative disorders affect millions of individuals leading to disability and death. Although neurodegenerative disorders, including Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Huntington’s disease (HD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), differ in their pathological genetic changes and degeneration of distinct neuron subsets, the evidence for the activation of apoptotic pathway (such as Caspase-3/8/9, Bax overexpression, and Bcl-2 reduction) in these disorders has been provided by many studies [8,9,10]. In addition, increasing numbers of studies have provided evidence that there were cell cycle-related proteins that increase the risk of neuron death in AD [11], PD [12], and ALS [13, 14], which suggests the neuronal cell cycle reentry is involved in neuronal apoptosis and death. Interestingly, hyperphosphorylation of RB1, a negative regulator of the cell cycle, is associated with neurodegenerative diseases [15]. Investigators have detected hyperphosphorylation of RB1 in the pathological tissues of AD patients, ALS patients, and PD patients [14, 16,17,18]. Knockout of Nrmt1 in mice led to the inactivation of RB1 and eventually induced neurodegenerative diseases [19], while the AD-related gene presenilin 1 (PS1) could protect the anaphase neuronal death by inhibiting the phosphorylation of RB1 [20]. These studies suggested that RB1 may be involved in neuronal apoptosis, but there is no direct in vivo evidence to prove a role for RB1 in the process, and the mechanism underlying the apoptosis pathway remains to be uncovered.
In this study, we recognized RB1 mutations in 2–3% of neurodegenerative diseases by analyzing clinical sequencing data. By using a Rb1 loss-of-function zebrafish mutant (zrb1-KO), we found that Rb1 deletion induced premature apoptosis of post-mitotic neurons through the Kmt5b-Bcl2a/caspase axis. Moreover, we verified the pathogenicity of the R621S and L819V mutations of human RB1 in neuronal apoptosis. This study clarified the specific effects and molecular mechanisms of Rb1 on activation and regulation of the neuronal apoptosis program and provided a reference for the pathogenesis of Rb1-related neurological diseases.
Results
RB1 mutations existed in several neurodegenerative diseases
Several studies have reported hyperphosphorylation of RB1 in the pathological tissues of neurodegenerative patients, such as AD, ALS, and PD [14, 16,17,18]. To determine the relationship between RB1 mutations and neurodegenerative disease, we calculated the RB1 mutation rates of PD (189 blood samples), AD (33 blood samples), HD (69 blood samples), and ALS (75 blood samples) using DNA sequence data from Guangzhou KingMed Diagnostics Group Co., Ltd. The results showed that the frequency of RB1 mutations in the coding region of the protein and RNA splicing was 2.64% in PD, 3.03% in AD, 2.85% in HD, and 2.66% in ALS (Fig. 1A and Table S1). These RB1 mutations comprise mutations at 6 sites (4 missense mutation sites: G38D, R621S, R798W and L819V; 2 splicing mutation sites: X405 and X406) and were identified in nine neurodegenerative patients (Fig. 1B, C). The frequencies of all four missense alleles in neurodegenerative patients were slightly higher than those in the ALAF project and normal Eastern Asian population from NCBI, but only the R621S and L819V mutations showed statistical significance (Fig. 1C). Taken together, we recognized RB1 mutations was 2–3% in neurodegenerative diseases by analyzing clinical sequencing data.
Rb1 deficiency impairs motor ability in juveniles and cognitive ability in adults
Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by progressive cognitive dysfunction and behavioral abnormalities [21]. To further understand the role of Rb1 in these diseases, we obtain a rb1 mutant (named zrb1-KO) in zebrafish (unpublished results). The zrb1-KO mutant had a 2-base deletion in exon 2, which produced a premature stop codon and significantly decreased the expression level of rb1 RNA (unpublished results). The swimming behavior of zrb1-KO homozygous juveniles was studied by the behavioral trajectory tracking system and the cognitive ability of zrb1-KO+/− heterozygous adults by T-maze. Our results showed that the swimming distance and speed of zrb1-KO homozygous juveniles were significantly reduced (Fig. 2A), indicating that Rb1 deletion caused motor dysfunction in juveniles. Due to the embryonic lethality of zrb1-KO homozygous (died at about 15 dpf, unpublished results), we used zrb1-KO+/− heterozygous adults (3 months old fish) to test their swimming behavior and cognitive ability. The results showed that the swimming distance and speed of the zrb1-KO+/− heterozygous adults were normal (Fig. S1A), but their ability of spatial learning and memory was decreased (Fig. 2B). Before food stimulus training, the wt and zrb1-KO+/− heterozygous adults showed no difference in left and right arm residence time. However, after 7 days of food stimulus training in the right arm (enriched chamber: EC), the wt showed increased residence time in the right arm, while the zrb1-KO+/− heterozygous adults showed no difference in left and right arm residence time (Fig. 2B). These findings suggest that Rb1 deficiency impairs motor ability in juvenile zebrafish and cognitive ability in heterozygous adult zebrafish.
Rb1-deficient mutants exhibit a significant hindbrain neuronal apoptosis
As apoptosis is a prominent feature in a broad spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases [22, 23], we investigate the role of Rb1 in neuronal apoptosis. Through the bright-field imaging by confocal, we observed a significant increase in apoptotic vesicles in the hindbrain of the zrb1-KO mutants (Fig. 3A). Microglia, the brain’s innate immune cells, can concentrate in areas where neuronal death occurs to eliminate apoptotic cell debris [24, 25]. Therefore, we employed Neutral Red (NR) staining and apoe mRNA probe to label microglia and observed an expansion and infiltration of microglia in the cerebellum and myelencephalon of zrb1-KO mutants (Fig. 3B and Fig. S2A). Consistent with these findings, AO staining (3 dpf and 5 dpf) and Tunel staining (3 dpf) revealed an increase in neuronal apoptosis in the cerebellum and myelencephalon of the zrb1-KO mutants (Fig. 3C, Fig. S2B, C). To further verify whether the induction of hindbrain neuronal apoptosis by rb1 deletion is an autonomous effect, we injected wild-type zrb1 mRNA into zrb1-KO embryos. The results showed that injection of zrb1 mRNA in the zrb1-KO mutants could partially rescue the neuronal apoptotic and microglia increase phenotype in the cerebellum and myelencephalon (Fig. 3D and Fig. S2D), indicating that the increased apoptosis in the zrb1-KO mutants was indeed due to deletion of the rb1 gene. Taken together, those findings suggest that Rb1-deficient mutants exhibit a significant hindbrain neuronal apoptosis and increased hindbrain infiltration of microglia, and these phenotypes can be partially rescued by wild-type zrb1 mRNA.
Apoptotic cells in the zrb1-KO are post-mitotic neurons
To characterize the populations of apoptotic neurons in the zrb1-KO mutants, we performed 10× single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on whole-brain cells of siblings and zrb1-KO mutants at 3 dpf. Based on uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) analysis, we clustered and annotated four major cell types (optic neurons, NSPCs, post-mitotic neurons, and non-neuronal cells), including 28 clusters (Fig. S3A and Table S2). Subsequently, the NSPCs and post-mitotic neuron populations were re-clustered into six subpopulations (NSPCs, forebrain neurons, midbrain neurons, cerebellum neurons, myelencephalon neurons, and others), including 22 clusters (Fig. 4A and Table S3). The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway-enriched analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was performed in subpopulations between siblings and zrb1-KO mutants. Interestingly, the results showed that the apoptotic pathways were enriched in DEGs of post-mitotic myelencephalon neurons and cerebellum neurons (Fig. 4B and C, Table S4), while cell cycle pathways were enriched in NSPCs populations (Fig. S3B). These data suggest that deletion of Rb1 induces hindbrain post-mitotic neuronal apoptosis as well as NSPCs’ proliferation in the zebrafish.
To further clarify the differences in cell populations in which Rb1 regulates proliferation and apoptosis, we examined the co-localization of proliferating and apoptotic cells in 3 dpf zrb1-KO mutants by prolonged BrdU treatment and TUNEL assay. Consistent with the scRNA-seq data, the proliferating and apoptotic cells appeared in different regions (Fig. S3C). Proliferating cells were mainly concentrated in the hindbrain/myelencephalon ventral midline, where neural progenitor cells are located. In contrast, apoptotic cells were scattered in the more mature regions on either side of the midline (Fig. S3C). Furthermore, we modified and obtained two plasmids, nestin:Cas9-T2A-mCherry,U6:gRNA(rb1) and huc:Cas9-T2Am-Cherry,U6:gRNA(rb1), which specifically knocked down rb1 in NSPCs and post-mitotic neurons (Fig. S3D, F), and the expression of rb1 in the whole brain after injecting two plasmids was significantly decreased (Fig. S3E, G). The results showed that suppressing rb1 expression in post-mitotic neurons induced only apoptosis in the cerebellum and myelencephalon (Fig. 4D and Fig. S3H), while suppressing rb1 expression in NSPCs induced cell proliferation but not apoptosis in the cerebellum and myelencephalon (Fig. 4E and Fig. S3I). Taken together, these data suggested that the apoptotic cells in the zrb1-KO mutants are hindbrain post-mitotic neurons, and that Rb1 regulates post-mitotic neurons apoptosis independently of its effect on the proliferation of NSPCs.
Rb1 inhibits Bcl2a/Caspase expression by binding Kmt5b to maintain the survival of post-mitotic neurons
Previous studies have shown that E2F family members (mainly E2f1, E2f2, and E2f3) released after Rb1 inactivation could activate ARF, TAp73, and caspase and induce cancer cell apoptosis through p53-dependent or -independent pathways [26,27,28]. To clarify the apoptotic pathway of Rb1 in the cerebellum and myelencephalon neurons, we crossed zrb1-KO mutants with Tg(nbt:bcl2a) transgenic fish to overexpress the bcl2 in the zrb1-KO mutants. Meanwhile, we also treated the zrb1-KO mutants with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK or p53 MO to inhibit the caspase and P53 pathways. Then, the number of apoptotic cells was detected by AO staining and NR staining. The results showed that either overexpression of bcl2a or inhibition of caspase in the zrb1-KO mutants decreased the number of apoptotic cells in the cerebellum and myelencephalon (Fig. 5A, B, Fig. S4A, B). However, blocking the P53 pathway did not alter the number of apoptotic cells in the cerebellum and myelencephalon in the zrb1-KO mutants (Fig. S4C, D), indicating that Rb1 regulation of neuronal apoptosis depends mainly on the Bcl2 and caspase pathways.
To further clarify the interaction protein of Rb1 involved in neuronal apoptosis, we used MO to knock down e2f1, e2f2 and e2f3, which have been reported as the apoptosis regulator [26, 29]. The MOs for e2f1 and e2f3 were designed based on literature reports [30, 31], while the efficacy of the e2f2 MO was experimentally validated (Fig. S5A, B). The results showed that reducing the expression of e2f1, e2f2, and e2f3 does not alleviate the apoptosis in zrb1-KO zebrafish (Fig. S5C–E), suggesting that the apoptosis induced by Rb1 appears to be independent of E2f. Then, we used scRNA-seq data to analyze the expression of known binding proteins of Rb1 (e.g., E2Fs, Hdac1, Kmt5b, Dnmt1, etc.). The result showed that only Kmt5b (methyltransferase 5B, Rb1-binding protein that can be enhanced by Rb1 [32]) highly expressed in the post-mitotic neurons of the cerebellum and myelencephalon (Fig. 5C and Fig. S5F). It has been shown that Kmt5b is involved in a neurodevelopmental and intellectual developmental disorder [33]. To investigate whether Kmt5b is involved in the RB1-regulated neuronal apoptosis pathway, we verified the interaction between Rb1 and Kmt5b in zebrafish. We coexpressed full-length mCherry-zRb1 and GFP–Kmt5b in wt zebrafish and performed immunoprecipitation experiment. The result showed that Rb1 can indeed interact with Kmt5b in zebrafish (Fig. 5D). Furthermore, we overexpressed kmt5b under the post-mitotic neuron promoter huc (huc:kmt5b-egfp; Fig. S4G, H) or knocked down kmt5b by MO (Fig. S5I) in siblings and zrb1-KO mutants. The results showed that overexpression of kmt5b in the zrb1-KO mutants partially rescued the apoptosis in the cerebellum and myelencephalon (Fig. 5E), while the knockdown of kmt5b partially mimicked the phenotype of the zrb1-KO mutants (Fig. 5F). Meanwhile, the knockdown of kmt5b resulted in decreased expression of bcl2a and increased expression of casp3 and casp9 in zrb1-KO mutants (Fig. S5J). These data indicated that Rb1 could bind Kmt5b to inhibit bcl2a/caspase expression and regulate the apoptotic pathway to maintain the survival of post-mitotic neurons.
R621S and L819V mutations of human RB1 may play an important role in neuronal apoptosis
Zebrafish mutants are a powerful tool for the rapid assessment of Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) in clinical practice [34]. Neuronal cell death plays a role in many neurodegenerative diseases [22, 23]. Therefore, we used zrb1-KO mutants to verify the effect of R621S/L819V alterations (a statistical significance mutation in neurodegenerative diseases, Fig. 1C) in human RB1 on neuronal apoptosis. The results showed that injecting human RB1 mRNA into the zrb1-KO mutants could partially rescue the neuronal apoptotic phenotype in the cerebellum and myelencephalon (Fig. 6A), while human RB1R621S mRNA or RB1L819V mRNA could not alter the number of apoptotic cells in the cerebellum and myelencephalon in the zrb1-KO mutants (Fig. 6A). To demonstrate whether the hRB1R621S and hRB1L819V mutation abrogates interaction between RB1 and Kmt5b, we perform immunoprecipitation assay in 293T cells. The result showed that hRB1 can interact with Kmt5b, while the hRB1R621S and hRB1L819V mutations fail to interact with Kmt5b (Fig. 6B). This suggests that the hRB1R621S and hRB1L819V mutations may abolish the interaction between RB1 and Kmt5b, resulting in an ineffective rescue of apoptotic phenotypes in zrb1-KO. The above results suggest that R621S and L819V mutations of human RB1 may play a role in neuronal apoptosis and are associated with neurodegenerative diseases.
Discussion
To clarify the role of RB1 in neuronal apoptosis and neurodegenerative diseases, we first analyzed blood sequencing data from patients with neurodegenerative diseases. The results revealed RB1 mutations in 2–3% of these patients. By constructing the zebrafish Rb1-deficient model, we found that there was significant post-mitotic neuronal apoptosis in the hindbrain, which was regulated by Caspase/Bcl2 rather than P53. We further demonstrated that overexpression of Kmt5b in post-mitotic neurons could partially rescue the Rb1 deficiency-induced apoptosis, suggesting a crucial role of the Rb1-Kmt5b-Caspase/Bcl2 axis in regulating post-mitotic neurons.
As the first cloned tumor suppressor gene, numerous studies have documented the anti-proliferative function of Rb1 in the nervous system [35,36,37]. However, the role of Rb1 in regulating apoptosis in the nervous system is still highly controversial. Neuronal apoptosis in Rb1-KO mice has been partly attributed to developmental defects in extra-embryonic and hematopoietic tissues [37, 38]. The researchers then conditionally knocked out Rb1 in different nerve cells, which resulted in different apoptotic outcomes. For example, deleting Rb1 in NSPCs (Nes+/creRblox/lox) did not affect cell apoptosis in CNS [37], while deleting Rb1 in telencephalic neurons (Foxg1+/creRblox/lox) and glial cells (Gfap+/creRblox/lox) could induce different degrees of apoptosis in CNS [35, 39]. Moreover, the neuronal types and mechanisms by which Rb1 induces apoptosis remain unclear. Our findings suggest that Rb1 autonomously protects post-mitotic neurons via the Kmt5b-Bcl2a/Caspase pathway.
Our data suggest that after neurons exit the cell cycle, Rb1 inhibits apoptosis by activating Kmt5b to suppress downstream Caspase activation. It is possible that, under normal circumstances, the Kmt5b separated from Rb1 to activate Caspase expression in the apoptosis of excess or temporarily functional neurons. However, reducing Kmt5b or Rb1 expression can lead to inappropriate apoptosis of post-mitotic neurons. This is similar to our previous finding that Rb1-E2F1 can protect T lymphocytes from premature apoptosis in zebrafish [30]. We speculate that Rb1 may play an essential role in activating and mediating apoptosis in various tissues that require strict control of cell number and quality.
Previous studies have shown that RB1 can recruit and stabilize KMT5B (a type of arginine methyltransferase) to the genome to methylate histone H4 at lysine-20 (K20), thus inhibiting gene transcription [32, 33]. Clinical studies have shown that pathogenic variants of KMT5B are associated with global developmental delay, macrocephaly, autism, and congenital abnormalities (OMIM# 617788). In mice, Kmt5b knockout is embryonic lethal [40], and monoallelic pathogenic variants of KMT5B disrupt normal epigenetic regulation of neural development [41]. In Kmt5b+/− and Kmt5b−/− mice brains, an increased number of cell death was observed in the cortex and corpus callosum [41]. In this study, through analyzing single-cell sequencing data of the whole brain of zebrafish at 3 dpf, we found that kmt5b was more highly expressed in neurons differentiated in the midbrain and hindbrain than in NSPCs. Knockdown of kmt5b caused apoptosis of hindbrain neurons similar to zrb1-KO mutants, while overexpression of kmt5b partially rescued the Rb1-deficient phenotype. However, the binding site between Kmt5b and Rb1 and the epigenetic regulation pathway regulated by the Rb1-Kmt5b axis remains to be studied.
Clinical studies have shown that the dysregulation of RB1 and its pathways has been detected in some glioblastoma and neurodegenerative disease samples [15, 18, 42, 43]. Consistent with this, we also detected the rate of RB1 heterozygous mutations in blood samples from neurodegenerative disease patients. Interestingly, the type of mutations in RB1 was different in glioma patients and neurodegenerative patients. Deep deletion and truncation were the predominant mutations in glioma patients (data not shown), while missense substitution was predominant in neurodegenerative patients. It is possible that different types of RB1 mutations can induce proliferative and apoptotic neurological diseases by altering different binding proteins. For example, mutations near the LXCEX binding site sequence (amino acids 709–757) on the RB1 pocket 2 may alter RB1’s binding to KMT5B and induce neuronal apoptosis, while mutations in the E2Fs binding site (amino acids 467–548) may more significantly affect cell proliferation. To confirm this association, stable, heritable, and feasible site-directed mutant zebrafish and mouse strains need to be established for further analysis.
Apoptosis is an important process in the development of the nervous system. Typically, about 50% of neurons die during neurogenesis before the nervous system matures, and this process is critical for establishing a definite pattern of neuronal connections [44]. This is commonly known as neurotrophic cell death which is regulated through the competition of a limited amount of nerve growth factor (NGF) released by the target cells these neurons innervate [45, 46]. Multiple neurotrophins and their receptors that signal to promote survival have now been identified. These include the classical neurotrophins NGF, and their respective ligands Trk family (TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC) and P75 neurotrophic receptor [47,48,49]. P75 neurotrophic receptor is an important receptor for the role of neurotrophins in modulating brain plasticity and apoptosis [50]. It has been found that the expression pattern of the neurotrophic factor itself has not changed significantly in Rb1 mutants. In contrast, the expression of the low-affinity NGF receptor p75 and the high-affinity NGF receptor TrkA were significantly reduced [51]. The lack of differentiation and increased neuronal cell death in sensory ganglia in RB1-deficient embryos appear to be at least partially explained by the lack of TrkA and p75 proteins [51]. In addition, after treating human glial cells and mouse cortical neurons with neurotrophic factors, elevated cytoplasmic E2F1 and RB1 nuclear phosphorylation levels were observed [52, 53]. Therefore, RB1 protein and its partner may play an important role in the establishment of a brain neurotrophin-mediated apoptosis signal pathway.
Materials and methods
Patients
Patients with neurodegenerative disease between 2017 and 2020 from Guangzhou KingMed Diagnostics were retrospectively retrieved and their test results and histological follow-up results were collected and analyzed. All patients provided written informed consent. Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Guangzhou KingMed Diagnostics (Reference number: 2022091).
Mutation analysis
The Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database (dbSNP) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp) was referred to for extracting the frequencies of variants in the normal Eastern Asian population, and Allele Frequency Aggregator Project (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp) was referred to for evaluating the frequencies of variants in the whole population.
Fish maintenance
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) were maintained at 28.5 °C on a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle. The following strains were used: AB, Tg(nbt:dsRed) [24], Tg(nbt:bcl2a) (also named Tg(Xla. Tubb:bcl-2)) [54], and zrb1-KO (F3, loss of function mutant, unpublished results) mutants.
Cell culture and transfection
293T cells were from Cell Bank/Stem Cell Bank Chinese Academy of Sciences. For 293T cell culture, cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, 11965092) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, 10270106). Cells were plated in 6-well culture plates and at 70–90% confluence they were transfected with GFP-Kmt5b and mCherry-hRB1/mCherry-hRB1R621S/mCherry-hRB1L819V for 48 h. Cells were cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere. Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, L3000075) was used to transfect the cells.
Neutral red staining and whole mount in situ hybridization
Microglia cells were scored in live larvae by treatment with vital dye neutral red (NR, Sigma-Aldrich, N6264) and whole mount in situ hybridization as described previously [55,56,57,58]. Briefly, embryos were stained with NR in egg water with 2.5 μg/mL neutral red and 0.0045% PTU at 28.5 °C for 4–6 h, followed by 3–4 egg water changes, and then analyzed 3–4 h later using a stereomicroscope (ZEISS, Axio Zoom.V16).
Acridine orange staining and TUNEL staining
The apoptosis of live zebrafish embryos was determined by acridine orange (AO, Sigma-Aldrich, A6014). To experiment, the embryos were placed in 1 µg/mL of AO egg water at 28.5 °C for 1 h. After washing six times/5 min in egg water, embryos were anesthetized with tricaine, mounted in 1% low melting point agarose, and examined using a Zeiss LSM800 laser scanning confocal microscope. The TUNEL assay was performed using the in situ Cell Death Detection Kit TMR Red (Roche 12156792910) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Co-immunoprecipitation
For zebrafish, about 100–200 2 dpf embryos (inject with GFP-Kmt5b and mCherry-zRb1) were collected and 1 ml deyolk buffer (0.3 mM PMSF, 1 Mm EDTA in 1×PBS) was added for deyolk. Then centrifuge 300 g/4 °C for 5 min to remove the supernatant. Add 90 μl 2× cell lysis buffer (CST, 9803), ice lysis for 10–30 min. Added with equal volume of H2O (cocktail and PMSF), centrifuge at 4 °C, 14,000 × g for 5 min, and transfer the supernatant to the new EP tube. 293T cells were transfected GFP-Kmt5b and mCherry-hRB1/mCherry-hRB1R621S/mCherry-hRB1L819V for 48 h. Transfected cells were lysed in 1x cell lysis buffer (1 mM PMSF/1x cocktail), ice lysis for 10–30 min. Then centrifuge at 4°C, 14,000 × g for 10 min, and apply the supernatant to the new EP tube. Zebrafish sample and cell sample supernatants were incubated overnight at 4 °C with 5 μg of anti-GFP antibody (Abcam, ab6658) or control IgG (Proteintech, 30000-0-AP), followed by incubation at 4 °C for 1–2 h with dynabeads protein G (Invitrogen™, 10004D). Beads were washed with cell lysis buffer and resuspended in 1× SDS–PAGE loading buffer for western blot analysis.
Western blot
Use 6% SDS-PAGE gel, and the separated proteins were transferred by electro blotting to NC membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST and incubated with the primary antibody including anti-GFP antibody (Abcam, ab6658) and anti-mCherry antibody (Abcam, ab125096) overnight at 4 °C. Then washing three times, the second antibody including anti-Goat HRP (Proteintech, SA00001-3) and anti-mouse HRP (Proteintech, SA00001-8) for about 2 h Immunolabelling was detected using SuperSignal West Femto (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 34096).
The 10× single-cell sequencing (scRNA-seq) sample preparation, sequencing, and analysis
The whole brains of siblings and zrb1-KO mutants (each group n = 10) were isolated under a microscope using the needle of a 1.5 ml syringe at 3 dpf. Brain tissues were dissociated into single cells using a papain solution (Worthington, LS003126) as described previously [59]. After staining the cells with trypan blue, they were counted. The proportion of live cells was calculated to ensure that the proportion of live cells was ≥ 90%. The cell concentration was adjusted to 1000 cells/μL. Single-cell encapsulation, cDNA library synthesis, and RNA sequencing were completed by Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Guangzhou, China). Raw sequencing data were processed by the Cell Ranger (v7.0) provided by 10X Genomics with default options. Reads were aligned to the zebrafish reference transcriptome (Ensembl release 104). Seurat was then used for further quality control and analysis of the single-cell transcriptome data. The scRNA-seq datasets contained a total of 17356 high-quality cells, including 8557 sibling and 8799 zrb1-KO mutant cells with a median of ∼3645 unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) detected per cell and ∼1156 genes detected per cell. After cell clustering and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) visualization [60], singleR was used for cell annotation [61]. The markers used for cell clustering have been obtained in previous reported literature [59, 62] and are listed in Table S3. KEGG pathway analysis [63] and other bioinformatics analyses were performed using Omicsmart, a real-time interactive online platform for data analysis (http://www.omicsmart.com).
Plasmid construction and microinjection
We obtain the Cas9-T2A-mCherry,U6:gRNA plasmid from Prof. Yang [42]. The nestin and huc promoters with Xhol and Agel sites were as previously studied [64, 65], and cloned into the Cas9-T2A-mCherry,U6:gRNA vectors using ClonExpress® Ultra One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, C115). In addition, the sequences of kmt5b, huc promoter, and egfp fragment were amplified by PCR and spliced into pTol vector using ClonExpress® ULtra One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, C115-01) to construct the huc:kmt5b-egfp plasmid. All plasmids were injected into the embryos at the one-cell stage at a concentration of 20 ng/uL. Following microinjection, all embryos were raised in egg water at 28.5 °C.
Morpholino and RNA injections
The design and injection morpholino of e2f1 [30], e2f3 [31], kmt5b [66] and p53 [67] were performed as previously reported. The e2f2 MO (5′-ATTCAGTCAGGCACACTTACAGCCA-3′) used to block splicing was designed and obtained from Gene Tools. The MO sequences used in this study are listed in Table S5. The e2f1 (0.5 mmol/L), e2f2 (0.5 mmol/L), e2f3 (0.5 mmol/L), kmt5b (0.5 mmol/L) and p53 (0.5 mmol/L) MOs were injected into zebrafish embryos at the one-cell stage. The mRNA synthesis was performed using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE™ SP6 Transcription Kit (Invitrogen, AM1340) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The zrb1 mRNA, hRB1 mRNA, hRB1R621S mRNA, and hRB1L819V mRNA were pressure injected into one-cell-stage embryos at a concentration of 125 ng/μL and collected at the appropriate stage.
Zebrafish behavioral trajectory tracking and T-maze
The embryos and adult fish were placed in 48 well plates at 5 dpf or in the 1 L aquarium at 3 months to detect behavior trajectory by Zebrafish behavioral trajectory tracking system (DanioVision, Noldus) as previously reported [68]. For the T maze as previously described [69]. In brief, the 3 months old adult wt and zrb1-KO+/− heterozygotes were used for training for 7 days. During the food stimulus training, the food was placed in the right arm to form an enriched chamber (EC), and the wt and zrb1-KO+/− heterozygotes were placed in the T-maze, trained for 5 min, and the residence time of fish to right arm (EC) and left arm was observed and recorded. If the fish does not find the EC zone after 5 min, guide it into the EC zone and stay for 3 min. After 7 days of training, the food was removed from the right arm, and the residence time in the left and right arms was measured.
Statistical methods
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9. The unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test is used to compare the means between the two groups. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by Tukey’s or Bonferroni adjustment is used for multiple comparisons. Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze two categorical variables. In each graph, the error bars reflect the mean ± SEM. Differences with P < 0.05 (*) or P < 0.01 (**) or P < 0.001 (***) or P < 0.0001 (****) were considered statistically significant.
Data availability
All data are presented in the main text or Supplementary Materials. Data produced in this manuscript are available on Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with accession number GSE212888.
References
Kintner C, Koyano-Nakagawa, N. Handbook of stem cells, 2nd edn. In: Lanza R, Atala A, editors. Academic Press; Elsevier Inc. 2013. p. 665–80.
Paridaen JT, Huttner WB. Neurogenesis during development of the vertebrate central nervous system. EMBO Rep. 2014;15:351–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/embr.201438447
Bergström T, Forsberg-Nilsson K. Neural stem cells: brain building blocks and beyond. Upsala J Med Sci. 2012;117:132–42. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2012.665096
Cavallaro S. Cracking the code of neuronal apoptosis and survival. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1963 https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2015.309
Price DJ, Jarman AP, Mason JO, Kind PC. Building brains - an introduction to neural development. 2017.
de la Rosa EJ, de Pablo F. Cell death in early neural development: beyond the neurotrophic theory. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:454–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01628-3
Hollville E, Romero SE, Deshmukh M. Apoptotic cell death regulation in neurons. FEBS J. 2019;286:3276–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.14970
Friedlander RM. Apoptosis and caspases in neurodegenerative diseases. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1365–75. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra022366
Radi E, Formichi P, Battisti C, Federico A. Apoptosis and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42:S125–152. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-132738.
Erekat NS. Apoptosis and its therapeutic implications in neurodegenerative diseases. Clin Anat. 2022;35:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23792
Zekanowski C, Wojda U. Aneuploidy, chromosomal missegregation, and cell cycle reentry in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 2009;69:232–53.
Omais S, Jaafar C, Ghanem N. “Till Death Do Us Part”: a potential irreversible link between aberrant cell cycle control and neurodegeneration in the adult olfactory bulb. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:144 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00144
Esteras N, Alquezar C, Bartolome F, de la Encarnacion A, Bermejo-Pareja F, Molina JA, et al. G1/S cell cycle checkpoint dysfunction in lymphoblasts from sporadic parkinson’s disease patients. Mol Neurobiol. 2015;52:386–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-014-8870-y
Ranganathan S, Bowser R. Alterations in G(1) to S phase cell-cycle regulators during amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:823–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63879-5
Joseph C, Mangani AS, Gupta V, Chitranshi N, Shen T, Dheer Y, et al. Cell cycle deficits in neurodegenerative disorders: uncovering molecular mechanisms to drive innovative therapeutic development. Aging Dis. 2020;11:946–66. https://doi.org/10.14336/ad.2019.0923
Hradek AC, Lee HP, Siedlak SL, Torres SL, Jung WY, Han AH, et al. Distinct chronology of neuronal cell cycle re-entry and tau pathology in the 3xTg-AD mouse model and alzheimer’s disease patients. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43:57–65. https://doi.org/10.3233/Jad-141083
Ranganathan S, Scudiere S, Bowser R. Hyperphosphorylation of the retinoblastoma gene product and altered subcellular distribution of E2F-1 during Alzheimer’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2001;3:377–85. https://doi.org/10.3233/Jad-2001-3403
Jordan-Sciutto KL, Dorsey R, Chalovich EM, Hammond RR, Achim CL. Expression patterns of retinoblastoma protein in Parkinson disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;62:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/62.1.68
Catlin JP, Marziali LN, Rein B, Yan Z, Feltri ML, Schaner Tooley CE. Age-related neurodegeneration and cognitive impairments of NRMT1 knockout mice are preceded by misregulation of RB and abnormal neural stem cell development. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:1014 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-04316-0
Prat MI, Adamo AM, Gonzalez SA, Affranchino JL, Ikeda M, Matsubara E, et al. Presenilin 1 overexpressions in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells decreases the phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein: relevance for neurodegeneration. Neurosci Lett. 2002;326:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00298-7
Matamala-Gomez M, Stasolla F, Seinfeld S, Caffo AO, Banakou D, Bottiroli S. Editorial: Neuropsychological and Cognitive-Behavioral Assessment of Neurodegenerative Disease and Rehabilitation Using New Technologies and Virtual Reality. Front Psychol. 2021;12:691909 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691909
Gorman AM. Neuronal cell death in neurodegenerative diseases: recurring themes around protein handling. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:2263–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00402.x
Giorgini F. Understanding neuronal dysfunction and loss in neurodegenerative disease. J Mol Med. 2013;91:651–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-013-1053-x
Peri F, Nusslein-Volhard C. Live imaging of neuronal degradation by microglia reveals a role for v0-ATPase a1 in phagosomal fusion in vivo. Cell. 2008;133:916–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.037
Neumann H, Kotter MR, Franklin RJ. Debris clearance by microglia: an essential link between degeneration and regeneration. Brain. 2009;132:288–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn109
Ozono E., Yamaoka S., Ohtani K. To Grow, Stop or die? – novel tumor-suppressive mechanism regulated by the transcription factor E2F. 2013:17–43. https://doi.org/10.5772/54510
Tan X, Wang JY. The caspase-RB connection in cell death. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:116–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0962-8924(97)01208-7
Sherr CJ, McCormick F. The RB and p53 pathways in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2002;2:103–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00102-2
Khidr L, Chen PL. RB, the conductor that orchestrates life, death and differentiation. Oncogene. 2006;25:5210–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209612
Zhang Z, Liu W, Zhao L, Huang Z, Chen X, Ma N, et al. Retinoblastoma 1 protects T cell maturation from premature apoptosis by inhibiting E2F1. Development. 2018;145. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.158139
Shimada Y, Kuninaga S, Ariyoshi M, Zhang B, Shiina Y, Takahashi Y, et al. E2F8 promotes hepatic steatosis through FABP3 expression in diet-induced obesity in zebrafish. Nutr Metab. 2015;12:17 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-015-0012-7
Gonzalo S, Garcia-Cao M, Fraga MF, Schotta G, Peters AH, Cotter SE, et al. Role of the RB1 family in stabilizing histone methylation at constitutive heterochromatin. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:420–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1235
Chen G, Han L, Tan S, Jia X, Wu H, Quan Y, et al. Loss-of-function of KMT5B leads to neurodevelopmental disorder and impairs neuronal development and neurogenesis. J Genet Genomics. 2022;49:881–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2022.03.004
Prendergast A, Ziganshin BA, Papanikolaou D, Zafar MA, Nicoli S, Mukherjee S, et al. Phenotyping zebrafish mutant models to assess candidate genes associated with aortic aneurysm. Genes. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010123
Ferguson KL, Vanderluit JL, Hébert JM, McIntosh WC, Tibbo E, MacLaurin JG, et al. Telencephalon-specific Rb knockouts reveal enhanced neurogenesis, survival and abnormal cortical development. EMBO J. 2002;21:3337–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf338
Lee EY, Chang CY, Hu N, Wang YC, Lai CC, Herrup K, et al. Mice deficient for Rb are nonviable and show defects in neurogenesis and haematopoiesis. Nature. 1992;359:288–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/359288a0
MacPherson D, Sage J, Crowley D, Trumpp A, Bronson RT, Jacks T. Conditional mutation of Rb causes cell cycle defects without apoptosis in the central nervous system. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:1044–53. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.23.3.1044-1053.2003
Wu L, de Bruin A, Saavedra HI, Starovic M, Trimboli A, Yang Y, et al. Extra-embryonic function of Rb is essential for embryonic development and viability. Nature. 2003;421:942–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01417
Marino S, Vooijs M, van Der Gulden H, Jonkers J, Berns A. Induction of medulloblastomas in p53-null mutant mice by somatic inactivation of Rb in the external granular layer cells of the cerebellum. Genes Dev. 2000;14:994–1004.
Schotta G, Sengupta R, Kubicek S, Malin S, Kauer M, Callen E, et al. A chromatin-wide transition to H4K20 monomethylation impairs genome integrity and programmed DNA rearrangements in the mouse. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2048–61. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.476008
Sheppard SE, Bryant L, Wickramasekara RN, Vaccaro C, Robertson B, Hallgren J, et al. Mechanism of KMT5B haploinsufficiency in neurodevelopment in humans and mice. Sci Adv. 2023;9:eade1463 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ade1463
Luo J, Liu P, Lu C, Bian W, Su D, Zhu C, et al. Stepwise crosstalk between aberrant Nf1, Tp53 and Rb signalling pathways induces gliomagenesis in zebrafish. Brain. 2021;144:615–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa404
Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321:1807–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164382
Yeo W, Gautier J. Early neural cell death: dying to become neurons. Dev Biol. 2004;274:233–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.07.026
Hamburger V. Trophic interactions in neurogenesis: a personal historical account. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1980;3:269–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.03.030180.001413
Levi-Montalcini R. The nerve growth factor 35 years later. Science. 1987;237:1154–62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3306916
Chao MV. Neurotrophins and their receptors: a convergence point for many signalling pathways. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:299–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1078
Bibel M, Barde YA. Neurotrophins: key regulators of cell fate and cell shape in the vertebrate nervous system. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2919–37. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.841400
Frade JM, Barde YA. Genetic evidence for cell death mediated by nerve growth factor and the neurotrophin receptor p75 in the developing mouse retina and spinal cord. Development. 1999;126:683–90. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.126.4.683
Sajanti A, Lyne SB, Girard R, Frantzén J, Rantamäki T, Heino I, et al. A comprehensive p75 neurotrophin receptor gene network and pathway analyses identifying new target genes. Sci Rep. 2020;10:14984 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72061-z
Lee EY, Hu N, Yuan SS, Cox LA, Bradley A, Lee WH, et al. Dual roles of the retinoblastoma protein in cell cycle regulation and neuron differentiation. Genes Dev. 1994;8:2008–21. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.8.17.2008
Strachan GD, Kopp AS, Koike MA, Morgan KL, Jordan-Sciutto KL. Chemokine- and neurotrophic factor-induced changes in E2F1 localization and phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product (pRb) occur by distinct mechanisms in murine cortical cultures. Exp Neurol. 2005;193:455–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.08.038
Jordan-Sciutto KL, Murray Fenner BA, Wiley CA, Achim CL. Response of cell cycle proteins to neurotrophic factor and chemokine stimulation in human neuroglia. Exp Neurol. 2001;167:205–14. https://doi.org/10.1006/exnr.2000.7594
Xu J, Wang T, Wu Y, Jin W, Wen Z. Microglia colonization of developing zebrafish midbrain is promoted by apoptotic neuron and lysophosphatidylcholine. Dev Cell. 2016;38:214–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.018
Herbomel P, Thisse B, Thisse C. Zebrafish early macrophages colonize cephalic mesenchyme and developing brain, retina, and epidermis through a M-CSF receptor-dependent invasive process. Dev Biol. 2001;238:274–88. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0393
Shiau CE, Monk KR, Joo W, Talbot WS. An anti-inflammatory NOD-like receptor is required for microglia development. Cell Rep. 2013;5:1342–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.004
Strähle U, Blader P, Adam J, Ingham PW. A simple and efficient procedure for non-isotopic in situ hybridization to sectioned material. Trends in genetics : TIG. 1994;10:75–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(94)90221-6
Jowett T, Lettice L. Whole-mount in situ hybridizations on zebrafish embryos using a mixture of digoxigenin- and fluorescein-labelled probes. Trends Genet. 1994;10:73–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(94)90220-8
Zhang H, Wang H, Shen X, Jia X, Yu S, Qiu X, et al. The landscape of regulatory genes in brain-wide neuronal phenotypes of a vertebrate brain. Elife. 2021;10. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68224
Becht E, McInnes L, Healy J, Dutertre CA, Kwok IWH, Ng LG, et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat Biotechnol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4314
Aran D, Looney AP, Liu L, Wu E, Fong V, Hsu A, et al. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat Immunol. 2019;20:163–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-018-0276-y
Raj B, Farrell JA, Liu J, El Kholtei J, Carte AN, Navajas Acedo J, et al. Emergence of neuronal diversity during vertebrate brain development. Neuron. 2020;108:1058–1074.e1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.023
Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.27
Lam CS, März M, Strähle U. gfap and nestin reporter lines reveal characteristics of neural progenitors in the adult zebrafish brain. Dev Dyn. 2009;238:475–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21853
Park HC, Kim CH, Bae YK, Yeo SY, Kim SH, Hong SK, et al. Analysis of upstream elements in the HuC promoter leads to the establishment of transgenic zebrafish with fluorescent neurons. Dev Biol. 2000;227:279–93. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2000.9898
Kuo AJ, Song J, Cheung P, Ishibe-Murakami S, Yamazoe S, Chen JK, et al. The BAH domain of ORC1 links H4K20me2 to DNA replication licensing and Meier-Gorlin syndrome. Nature. 2012;484:115–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10956
Zhao Y, Wu M, Li J, Meng P, Chen J, Huang Z, et al. The spliceosome factor sart3 regulates hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell development in zebrafish through the p53 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:906 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-04215-4
Colwill RM, Creton R. Imaging escape and avoidance behavior in zebrafish larvae. Rev Neurosci. 2011;22:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/RNS.2011.008
Ngoc Hieu BT, Ngoc Anh NT, Audira G, Juniardi S, Liman RAD, Villaflores, OB, et al. Development of a modified three-day T-maze protocol for evaluating learning and memory capacity of adult zebrafish. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041464
Acknowledgements
We thank Xiao-Jun Yang from Shantou University Medical College for kindly providing the plasmids, and Yi-yue Zhang and Jian-chao Li from the South China University of Technology for their expert advice.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0801000), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023A1515010396), and the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (202201010156).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: WZ, WL; Project administration: WZ, WL, GM, QW, JX, SY, ZH; Methodology: SZ, WL; Software: SZ, WL; Validation: SZ, GM; Formal analysis: SZ, WL, GM; Funding acquisition: WZ, WL; Investigation: WZ, WL, GM, QW, JX, SZ, SY, ZH; Resources: WZ, WL; Data curation: WZ, WL, GM, QW, JX, SZ, SY, ZH; Writing – original draft: SZ, WL, WZ; Writing - review & editing: WZ, WL, SZ, GM, ZH; Supervision: WZ, WL, GM, QW, JX, SY, ZH.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
All Zebrafish studies were performed in accordance with the animal research advisory committee of South China University of Technology.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, S., Mo, G., Wang, Q. et al. Role of RB1 in neurodegenerative diseases: inhibition of post-mitotic neuronal apoptosis via Kmt5b. Cell Death Discov. 10, 182 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-024-01955-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-024-01955-y