Abstract
Dysfunctional paracrine signaling through Pannexin 1 (PANX1) channels is linked to several adult neurological pathologies and emerging evidence suggests that PANX1 plays an important role in human brain development. It remains unclear how early PANX1 influences brain development, or how loss of PANX1 alters the developing human brain. Using a cerebral organoid model of early human brain development, we find that PANX1 is expressed at all stages of organoid development from neural induction through to neuroepithelial expansion and maturation. Interestingly, PANX1 cellular distribution and subcellular localization changes dramatically throughout cerebral organoid development. During neural induction, PANX1 becomes concentrated at the apical membrane domain of neural rosettes where it co-localizes with several apical membrane adhesion molecules. During neuroepithelial expansion, PANX1−/− organoids are significantly smaller than control and exhibit significant gene expression changes related to cell adhesion, WNT signaling and non-coding RNAs. As cerebral organoids mature, PANX1 expression is significantly upregulated and is primarily localized to neuronal populations outside of the ventricular-like zones. Ultimately, PANX1 protein can be detected in all layers of a 21–22 post conception week human fetal cerebral cortex. Together, these results show that PANX1 is dynamically expressed by numerous cell types throughout embryonic and early fetal stages of human corticogenesis and loss of PANX1 compromises neuroepithelial expansion due to dysregulation of cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion, perturbed intracellular signaling, and changes to gene regulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Human brain development follows a series of intricately choreographed events involving large cellular migrations and rearrangements, changes in cell morphology, and cell fate specification. These activities are locally organized through exquisite spatial and temporal control of signaling events between neighboring cells. Dysfunctional paracrine signaling through Pannexin 1 (PANX1) channels is linked to several adult neurological pathologies and human germline PANX1 variants have been associated with severe neurological deficits and autism spectrum disorder [1, 2]. Studies in postnatal rodent models reveal PANX1 expression across various neural cell types including neurons, glia, and neural progenitor cells [3,4,5]. In postnatal murine neural precursor cells (NPCs), PANX1 restricts neuronal differentiation by impeding neurite extension and cell migration via the channels’ ATP release functions and interactions with the cytoskeleton [6, 7]. Others have demonstrated PANX1 localization at neuronal synapses where the channels help to replenish extracellular ATP, negatively regulate dendritic spine density, and maintain synaptic strength [8, 9]. However, it remains unclear how early PANX1 influences human brain development, or which cell types express PANX1 in the developing human brain.
Recent reports have revealed that PANX1 is expressed in some of the earliest cell types in human development including human oocytes, pluripotent stem cells, and the three embryonic germ layers (definitive endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm) [10,11,12]. PANX1 channels are also expressed throughout embryonic brain development. PANX1 transcript expression is robust in the developing mouse cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and olfactory bulbs where maximum PANX1 expression occurs at murine embryonic day 18 and declines thereafter [13]. Gene expression analyses curated by BrainSpan indicate that a similar pattern occurs in the human system as PANX1 transcript expression in various brain structures is high at 8 post conception weeks (pcw) (earliest timepoint assessed) but diminishes around 26 pcw (Brainspan.org). The Human Protein Atlas reports moderate-to-high PANX1 protein abundance in the adult human cerebral cortex (humanproteinatlas.org). Given this dynamic pattern of PANX1 expression, we expect that PANX1-mediated cellular communication influences proper development of neural tissues.
To date, the cellular and subcellular localization of PANX1 protein throughout human embryonic and early fetal brain development have not been investigated. Here we use iPSC-derived neural precursor cells, neurons, and cerebral organoids to investigate PANX1 expression and localization as iPSCs differentiate to neural cell types and organized cortical structures. Cerebral organoids recapitulate a variety of human brain regions including the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, choroid plexus, and retinal tissue and contain a variety of cell types including neural progenitors (like neuroepithelial cells and radial glia), neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, retinal pigment epithelial cells, and ependymal cells [14,15,16,17]. Importantly, the cells within cerebral organoids self-organize to form cortical-like layers like those seen in the developing human brain [14] making cerebral organoids a powerful tool to study the embryonic and early fetal stages of human brain development.
Given that PANX1 is expressed in the earliest cell types of human development and is linked to neurological disease, we sought to explore PANX1 expression and localization throughout early stages of human brain development. Immunostaining of a 21–22 pcw (midgestation) human fetal cerebral cortex reveals PANX1 protein expression in all cortical layers, with heightened signal intensity in the marginal zone. We observe concentrated PANX1 expression at the apical membrane domain of neuroepithelial-stage iPSC-derived cerebral organoids whereas more mature organoids exhibit the heaviest PANX1 expression within the emerging neuronal layers. CRISPR-Cas9 PANX1 gene ablation results in stunted neuroepithelial expansion and dysregulation of genes related to cell signaling, cell adhesion, and expression of non-coding RNAs.
Results
PANX1 is expressed across the human fetal cerebral cortex
The PANX1 literature heavily favors perinatal or postnatal mouse systems. However, the Allen Institute’s Brainspan prenatal laser microdissection (LMD) microarray dataset depicts PANX1 transcript expression in 21 pcw human fetal brains including cortical regions such as the ventricular zone (VZ), subventricular zone (SVZ), intermediate zone (IZ), subplate (SP), cortical plate (CP), and marginal zone (MZ) (Brainspan.org). To confirm whether PANX1 protein is also expressed in these developing human tissue layers, we performed immunofluorescence confocal imaging on cortical samples from a 21–22 pcw human fetal brain (Fig. 1). We find PANX1 signal across all layers of the developing human cerebral cortex with widespread staining throughout the SVZ and brighter manifestation in the marginal zone (Fig. 1A). PANX1 signal intensity is diminished in regions with tightly packed nuclei, such as the cortical plate (Fig. 1A). In contrast, cortical layers with fewer nuclei such as the marginal zone and subplate display widespread PANX1 staining, concentrated throughout the many processes of MAP2-positive neurons (Fig. 1A, B). Interestingly, while we did see some evidence of PANX1 expression within the SOX2-positive stem cells lining the ventricular zone, this staining was much diminished compared to the more mature neuronal layers within the human fetal cortex (Fig. 1C). Collectively, we find that PANX1 protein expression is apparent in all cortical layers of the early fetal human brain.
PANX1 is upregulated in neural progenitor cells and neurons compared to undifferentiated iPSCs
The first step to determining how PANX1 influences human brain development is to uncover when and where PANX1 is expressed in the developing human brain. However, human fetal brain samples are precious and few, and a lot of development has already occurred even at the 21–22 pcw timepoint presented in Fig. 1. Therefore, once we confirmed PANX1 expression in a 21–22 pcw human fetal cortex, we evaluated PANX1 expression and localization in human iPSCs in vitro, and after differentiation into neural precursor cells (NPCs) and mature neurons. As we previously reported, PANX1 protein localized primarily to the cell periphery of undifferentiated iPSCs, where it colocalized with actin (Fig. 2A). PANX1 was similarly colocalized with actin in SOX2-expressing NPCs and TUJ1-expressing neurons (Fig. 2A). NPCs in culture typically form polarized neural rosettes, identified by Nestin/SOX2 expression and characteristic flower petal arrangement [18]. Interestingly, as the NPCs in culture arranged into neural rosette-like structures, we observed PANX1 staining concentrated at the centermost (apical) side of the neural rosettes (Fig. 2A). Western blotting revealed a significant upregulation of PANX1 protein as iPSCs differentiate toward NPCs and neurons (Fig. 2B, C). Indeed, NPCs express 2.852 ± 0.522-fold more PANX1 and neurons express 5.324 ± 0.357-fold more PANX1 compared to undifferentiated iPSCs (Fig. 2B, C). Additionally, we noted a difference in the PANX1 banding pattern on Western blots where NPCs and neurons possess a significantly greater proportion of the high molecular weight PANX1 isoform, most likely corresponding to the heavily glycosylated Gly2 species (Fig. 2B, D). The putative Gly2 PANX1 species comprises 40.150 ± 0.843% of total PANX1 in iPSCs, 79.848 ± 1.551% in NPCs, and 84.370 ± 1.357% in neurons (Fig. 2D). This dramatic upregulation of PANX1 protein during NPC and neuron differentiation suggests a role for PANX1 in neural specification and early human brain development.
PANX1 is apically expressed in budding neuroepithelia of iPSC-derived cerebral organoids
To further understand how PANX1 influences the earliest stages of human brain development, we next employed a cerebral organoid model to evaluate PANX1 localization throughout the embryonic and early fetal stages of human cortex development. Cerebral organoids are generated through (1) 3D induction of neuroectoderm from stem cell-derived embryoid bodies (EBs); (2) arrangement of neural rosettes and neuroepithelial expansion; (3) ventricular-like zone formation and intermediate progenitor emergence; (4) neuronal differentiation and cortical layering (Fig. 3A). Ultimately, this results in a large, layered organoid comprised of numerous neural lineages.
At the end of the EB stage (day 5), organoids appear as a dense, disorganized cellular mass exhibiting some SOX2 and Nestin-positive regions. Whole-mount immunofluorescence confocal microscopy revealed wide PANX1 expression throughout the EB (Fig. 3B). Upon the initiation of neural induction (day 7), organoids begin to arrange into pseudostratified neural rosettes lined by polarized SOX2-positive cells. At this stage, the organoid consists of multiple rosette-like arrangements of SOX2-positive neuroepithelial cells surrounding fluid-filled spaces. Similar to what we observed in the 2D NPC cultures, PANX1 staining shifted at this stage to concentrate at the apical membrane region of these neural rosettes (Fig. 3C, arrowheads). As apical-basal polarity becomes fully established at the end of neuroepithelial expansion (day 10), PANX1 is preferentially localized toward the apical surface of each neuroepithelial sphere as shown through whole-mount immunofluorescence (Fig. 3D). To complement the whole-mount immunofluorescence data presented in Fig. 3B–D, we cryosectioned day 10 organoids and performed immunofluorescence confocal imaging of PANX1 at the neuroepithelial expansion stage of cortical organoid development. Confocal imaging of cryosectioned day 10 organoids confirmed a striking concentration of PANX1 protein localized to the apical edge of the neuroepithelial buds (Fig. 3E). Together, these data indicate that PANX1 is expressed throughout the embryonic stages of cerebral organoid development, from the beginning of neural lineage commitment to the formation of polarized neuroepithelium where the channels largely reside at the apical edge.
PANX1 genetic ablation and pharmacological inhibition results in significantly smaller organoids
At neuroepithelial expansion, NPCs proliferate rapidly via symmetric division to make up the required tissue and organ mass. After expansion, NPCs must successfully migrate and differentiate via asymmetric division into mature neural cell types. We have previously reported that PANX1−/− iPSCs exhibit deficits in ectoderm lineage specification [12]. Given the upregulation of PANX1 during NPC differentiation, we hypothesized that loss of PANX1 would compromise the neuroepithelial expansion stage of organoid development. Immunofluorescence imaging of whole mount day 10 organoids confirmed the absence of PANX1 in our CRISPR-Cas9 knockout organoids (Fig. 4A). We used qPCR to assess whether PANX1 ablation elicits compensatory upregulation of other pannexin isoforms (PANX2 and PANX3) or the gap junction channel connexin43 (GJA1) in day 10 organoids (Fig. 4B). Transcripts for PANX3 were undetectable and GJA1 was not statistically different between control and PANX1−/−. Interestingly, PANX2 mRNA transcripts were downregulated in the PANX1−/− organoids. PANX1−/− organoids were significantly smaller than control, which was even more pronounced in probenecid (PBN)-treated organoids (Fig. 4C, D). Possible reasons for smaller organoids at neuroepithelial expansion include differences in apoptosis, proliferation, or an imbalance in symmetric/asymmetric cell division. To that end, we found similar proportions of cleaved caspase 3 (apoptosis marker) and ki67 (proliferation marker) in our control and PANX1−/− organoids, suggesting little difference in apoptosis or cell proliferation (Fig. 4E). Cell division angle relative to the apical surface can reveal whether NPCs will undergo symmetrical division (self-renewal) or asymmetrical division (differentiation) [18]. Because PANX1 is reported to positively regulate neural progenitor cell self-renewal and proliferation [6], we examined organoid size and thickness of the PAX6+ neuroepithelial progenitors in day 10 organoids. Skewed symmetrical/asymmetrical NPC division could result in premature neuronal differentiation, which could account for the small size of PANX1−/− organoids. However, we found no difference in the proportion of nuclei undergoing vertical (symmetrical) or horizontal (asymmetrical) divisions (Fig. 4F–H). Furthermore, the thickness of the PAX6+ progenitor cell layer was not significantly different in PANX1−/− organoids compared to control (Fig. 4I).
Transcriptomic analysis of PANX1−/− organoids reveal gene expression changes related to neural development
Although PANX1 genetic ablation and pharmacological inhibition resulted in significantly smaller organoids at the neuroepithelial stage, none of the metrics we evaluated in Fig. 4 were changed in our PANX1−/− organoids. Therefore, we compared transcriptomic profiles of day 10 PANX1−/− organoids to control organoids using RNA-sequencing technology. Immunofluorescence imaging of cryosectioned day 10 organoids confirmed that nearly all of cells within day 10 cerebral organoids are PAX6 positive neural progenitor cells (Fig. 5A). Analysis of transcriptomic data using DESeq2 revealed a total of 1,047 differentially expressed genes with an adjusted p-value of less than 0.05. Limiting the genes to those with a log fold change (log2FC) of at least 1 (or −1) resulted in 453 differentially expressed genes (231 upregulated, 222 downregulated) in response to PANX1 knockout (Fig. 5B; Supplementary Data). Similar to our previous study, pluripotency-related genes such as POU5F1 (OCT4) and ZSCAN10 were among the most significantly upregulated individual genes in PANX1−/− organoids compared to control [12]. Also observed was upregulation of vertebrae development-associated (VRTN), cell differentiation homeobox protein (NKX1-2) [19], and developmental factor Forkhead box H1 (FOXH1) [20]. The most significantly downregulated genes included the anti-apoptotic coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain containing 2 (CHCHD2) [21], the orphan nuclear receptor tailless (TLX/NR2E1) [22], signaling molecule R-spondin 2 gene (RSPO2) [23] and neuronal homeobox genes BARHL1 and BARHL2 [24].
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using gene ontology (GO) terms related to biological processes (BP), molecular function (MF), cellular component (CC), and KEGG pathways was used to group differentially expressed genes along common biological themes (Fig. 5C-E; Supplementary Data). Most GO:BP categories included genes involved in developmental processes (Fig. 5C) while GO:MF categories were over-represented by genes associated with cell signaling. In terms of cellular components, differentially expressed genes were over-represented in GO categories related to plasma membrane components as well as extracellular and peripheral cellular regions (Fig. 5D). GSEA analysis allowed us to categorize differentially expressed genes according to KEGG pathway maps representing what is currently known about molecular interactions and biological networks. We identified 10 KEGG pathways that were significantly over-represented in our GSEA analysis (adjusted p-value < 0.05) (Fig. 5E and Supplementary Data). Among the most over-represented KEGG pathways are those associated with ECM-receptor interactions and adhesion molecules (KEGG categories 04512, 04514 and 04510) (Table 1). Signaling pathways related to WNT signaling and Hedgehog signaling were also represented in our differentially expressed genes (KEGG categories 04310 and 04340) (Table 2). Finally, we found a surprising number of non-coding RNA molecules differentially expressed in our PANX1−/− organoids compared to control (Table 3).
PANX1 co-localizes with apically situated junctional proteins at the neuroepithelial expansion stage of cerebral organoids
Given the abundance of altered genes related to cell adhesion and WNT signaling in our PANX1−/− organoids, and because β-catenin was recently recognized as a PANX1 interacting partner [25], we investigated key junctional protein targets at the apical domain to see if they are differentially expressed or localized in PANX1−/− organoids (Figs. 6 and 7). Rosette formation depends upon apical-basolateral patterning, coordinated by several key proteins including N-Cadherin, β-Catenin and ZO-1 [18]. Therefore, we next examined the colocalization of PANX1 with these apically situated adhesion proteins (Fig. 6). Manders’ correlation coefficients demonstrated a robust colocalization of PANX1 with β-catenin (0.4070 ± 0.06509) and PANX1 with N-cadherin (0.5457 ± 0.05012). However, there was very little colocalization between PANX1 and the tight junction protein ZO-1 (0.06847 ± 0.01272) (Fig. 6C). We next evaluated the expression and localization of β-catenin, Claudin 1, N-cadherin and ZO-1 in PANX1−/− organoids (Fig. 7). Although several of these gene classes were significantly altered in the RNAseq dataset, Western blotting and immunofluorescence showed similar expression and localization patterns between control and PANX1−/− organoids (Fig. 7A–C). Claudin 1 localization was a bit trickier as it was only observed at the apical membrane domain in ~33% of control neural rosettes (Fig. 7A, B, D). However, Claudin 1 was never present at the apical membrane domain in any PANX1−/− neural rosettes.
PANX1 is preferentially expressed in neurons as cerebral organoids mature
As cerebral organoids mature, the numerous neural rosettes continue to hollow out and elongate, forming fluid-filled ventricular-like spaces. Furthermore, the tightly packed neuroepithelia and NPCs residing in the emerging ventricular-like zone begin to asymmetrically divide and migrate, ultimately differentiating into neurons, and later, to glia. To examine how PANX1 expression and localization change as organoids begin to mature and establish cortical layering, we examined mature cerebral organoids between 40 to 120 days (Fig. 8). Immunostaining revealed some apical expression of PANX1 along SOX2-positive ventricular-like zones in day 40 organoids (Fig. 8A). However, PANX1 signal intensity appeared brightest outside the ventricular-like zones coinciding in regions with TUJ1-positive neurons (Fig. 8B). In 120-day old organoids we observed PANX1 expression within stellate GFAP-positive cells with astrocyte-like morphology (Fig. 8C). Our results indicate that mature organoids exhibit PANX1 localization at the apical side of the ventricular-like zones and in more developmentally advanced neural cell types such as neurons and GFAP-positive glia.
Discussion
Given that PANX1 is expressed in the earliest cell types of human development and is linked to neurological disease, we sought to explore PANX1 expression and localization throughout early stages of human brain development. Although most PANX1 studies focus on perinatal or adult mouse models, PANX1 is expressed in human oocytes, embryos and pluripotent stem cells, suggesting a fundamental role for PANX1 in human development [10,11,12]. The potential role of PANX1 in human brain development is further supported by a loss-of-function human germline PANX1 variant in a patient with severe neurological deficits [2], and by PANX1 and PANX2 single nucleotide polymorphisms implicated in autism spectrum disorder [1]. Indeed, we recently reported that PANX1 is expressed in human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and our PANX1−/− iPSCs exhibit decreased ectoderm formation compared to control [12]. This finding indicated to us that PANX1 might impact the development of ectodermal-derived tissues, such as the brain. The Allen Institute’s Brainspan prenatal laser microdissection microarray dataset depicts PANX1 transcript expression in 21 pcw human fetal brains (Brainspan.org). Because transcript expression does not always correlate to protein expression, we were surprised that we could not find published evidence of PANX1 protein expression at this stage of human development. We have now confirmed that PANX1 protein is also expressed across all layers of the developing human cerebral cortex with brighter manifestation in the marginal zone and subventricular zone. The high PANX1 expression in the human fetal brain, combined with our findings of ectodermal lineage deficits in human PANX1−/− iPSCs suggests a role for PANX1 in human neural development.
We previously reported that PANX1 is expressed at the cell surface across iPSCs and iPSC-derived embryoid bodies [12]. Intriguingly, we find here that PANX1 localization becomes very restricted upon cerebral organoid neural induction, when organoids begin to arrange into neural rosettes (Figs. 2, 3, 6). As apical-basolateral polarity becomes fully established at the end of neuroepithelial expansion, the organoid consists of multiple rosette-like arrangements of SOX2-positive neuroepithelial cells surrounding fluid-filled spaces. These neuroepithelia are the progenitor cells of the developing brain and express tight junctions, adherens junctions, and exhibit apical-basolateral polarity, forming a layer of pseudostratified columnar neuroepithelium which gives rise to the neural plate and subsequent neural tube [18, 26, 27]. At the neuroepithelial expansion stage of cerebral organoid development, PANX1 was preferentially localized toward the apical surface of each neuroepithelial rosette and colocalized with key apical proteins including β-catenin and N-cadherin (Fig. 6). Our RNAseq in day 10 organoids revealed a significant downregulation in several adhesion molecules including cadherins, claudins, neural cell adhesion molecule 1 (NCAM), and others. In addition to establishing polarity in the developing brain, these cytoskeleton-anchoring proteins help to coordinate the mitotic spindle orientation and several downstream signal transduction cascades controlling neural cell fate. In the future it would be interesting to investigate whether PANX1 physically interacts with these junctional proteins as has been recently shown in other systems [25]. In addition to being significantly upregulated in neurons compared to iPSCs, our Western blot analyses showed differential PANX1 banding patterns between iPSCs, NPCs, and neurons where most of the PANX1 in NPCs and neurons exists as a high molecular weight species. These different molecular weight species have been shown to correspond to different PANX1 glycosylation species with unglycosylated (Gly0), simple glycosylation (Gly1) and complex carbohydrate modifications (Gly2), which are thought to influence plasma membrane targeting [28]. Other groups have shown that PANX1 may be preferentially distributed to basolateral or apical membrane compartments depending on the cell and tissue type where intracellular PANX1 retention inhibits cell polarization [29, 30]. Apical PANX1 channels residing at the unopposed edge of the ventricular-like zone may have implications for paracrine signaling and long-range coordination of NPC proliferation in the ventricular-like zone. In the postnatal murine brain, ATP released into the extracellular space by PANX1 channels activates P2X7 and P2Y purinergic receptors which in turn stimulate the proliferation of NPCs [6]. Future studies will determine whether PANX1 serves a similar role in neuroepithelial expansion at this early stage of development.
Current literature implicates PANX1 with WNT/β-catenin signaling through the physical interaction of PANX1 with β-catenin in melanoma cells [25, 31]. PANX1 pharmacological inhibition or gene knockdown slowed melanoma cell growth and significantly decreased β-catenin protein levels in melanoma cells. Here we find that PANX1 and β-catenin are both apically localized in day 10 neuroepithelial rosettes and exhibit considerable colocalization. However, we detected no change in cell proliferation or apoptosis in our PANX1−/− organoids, nor did we find any appreciable changes in β-catenin localization or expression with PANX1 genetic ablation. In the brain, WNT signaling inhibits the self-renewal of murine cortical neural precursor cells and promotes differentiation of neuronal cell types such as dopaminergic neurons [23, 32]. Indeed, several of the differentially expressed WNT-associated genes in our PANX1−/− organoids are associated with neurodevelopment and neural stem cells. Thus, PANX1 plays an important role in WNT signaling for both melanoma cells and neuroepithelial cells, albeit through different mechanisms.
Our RNAseq screen revealed a surprising number of differentially expressed non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). Very few studies to date have linked PANX1 with ncRNA expression [33, 34]. Not all of the ncRNAs that came out in our screen have documented roles in neurodevelopment, however several are associated with neural stem cells, neuronal differentiation and neurodevelopmental disorders. Many of the ncRNAs in our screen are related to cell cycle control and apoptosis in different forms of cancer. Given the smaller size of our PANX1−/− day 10 organoids, it is possible that differential expression of ncRNAs could contribute to changes in neural precursor cell proliferation or apoptosis. However, as we saw no obvious changes in ki67 (cell proliferation) or cleaved caspase 3 (apoptosis) expression in our PANX1−/− organoids, we suspect the smaller organoids are not related to changes in cell proliferation or apoptosis.
Despite being apically localized at the neuroepithelial expansion stage, PANX1 resided primarily in TUJ1-expressing neurons in mature cerebral organoids, with lesser amounts persisting in the SOX2-positive ventricular-like regions (Fig. 8). Consistent with this observation, PANX1 protein expression was significantly elevated in differentiated neurons compared to NPCs (Fig. 2). We found a similar pattern in the human fetal cortex where PANX1 staining was concentrated outside of the ventricular zone (Fig. 1). This is in contrast to reports in mouse brains where PANX1 was found to be concentrated in periventricular neural stem cells in postnatal day 15–60 mice [6, 7, 35]. Just as we found a dramatic shift in PANX1 cellular distribution between day 10 and 40 cerebral organoids, it is possible that PANX1 could again change distribution between the fetal and adult brains.
In postnatal murine brains, pharmacological inhibition of PANX1 channels prevents NPC proliferation and enhances neuronal differentiation by promoting neurite extension and cell migration [6, 7]. Others have demonstrated PANX1 localization at neuronal synapses where the channels help to replenish extracellular ATP, negatively regulate dendritic spine density, and maintain synaptic strength [8, 9, 36]. It remains to be seen whether human iPSC-derived PANX1−/− neurons exhibit similar increases in spine and branching density as has been observed in mouse. Another major Pannexin isoform, Panx2, has shown similar roles in NPC maintenance as Panx2 knockdown in Neuro2a cells significantly accelerated neuronal differentiation [37]. We report here that our stunted PANX1 knockout cerebral organoids exhibit a significant decrease in PANX2 mRNA. Moreover, treating the organoids with probenecid, which should pharmacologically inhibit both PANX1 and PANX2 channels caused an even more pronounced decrease in organoid size. Thus, the stunted neuroepithelial expansion we observed in our PANX1−/− organoids might be due to a loss of both PANX1 and PANX2 proteins.
Cerebral organoids are emerging as a valuable tool to model early neurodevelopmental processes and developmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder, microcephaly and others [38]. Human iPSC-derived organoids are also amenable to CRISPR-Cas9 genetic manipulation to induce gene knockout or insert pathogenic variants or variants of unknown significance. This makes organoids a valuable tool to uncover how individual genes (such as PANX1) influence human development and disease in a human background. Because they can be derived from individual patients, they are also a useful platform for evaluating drug toxicity and therapeutic drug screening toward precision medicine. Cerebral organoids have several advantages over traditional mouse models, including the ability to observe much earlier developmental timepoints, the relative ease of genetic and pharmacological manipulation, and being comprised of human cells. However, a caveat of human cerebral organoids is the absence of microglia and blood vessels, which are thought to emerge during gestational weeks 4–24 [39]. Here, we primarily focused on neuroepithelial expansion, which mimics the neurulation stage of development (gestational week 3–4), just before microglia and blood vessels would have developed in utero. We conclude that PANX1 is dynamically expressed by multiple cell types in the developing human cerebral cortex. In combination with previous reports from our group and others, this study details the participation of PANX1 in iPSC lineage restriction, co-localizations with key apical membrane proteins and junctional complexes in neuroepithelial rosettes, and PANX1 upregulation and redistribution to TUJ1-expressing neurons within mature human cerebral organoids.
Materials & methods
Induced pluripotent stem cells
These studies were approved by the Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics board (HREB # 2018.210). A male iPSC line (GM25256) was purchased from the Coriell Institute for Medical Research (Cat# GM25256, Coriell, Camden, NJ, USA). The female iPSCs were created as described previously [40] and obtained through a material transfer agreement with The University of Western Ontario. Both cell lines were derived from fibroblasts of apparently healthy individuals with no known genetic pathologies.
iPSCs were cultured in a humidified 37 °C cell culture incubator buffered with atmospheric oxygen and 5% CO2. The iPSCs were grown on Geltrex™-coated (Cat# A141330, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) culture dishes and fed daily with Essential 8™ medium (Cat# A1517001, ThermoFisher) or mTeSR™ Plus (Cat #100-0276, STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, BC, CAN) maintenance medium. Every 4–5 days, iPSCs were passaged as small aggregates using a cell scraper and 0.5 mM EDTA (Cat #AM9260G, ThermoFisher) prepared in Ca2+/Mg2+-free phosphate buffered saline (PBS; Cat# 319-005-CL, WISENT Inc., St. Bruno, QC, CAN) [41] when the colonies exhibited smooth borders and tight cell packing. Aggregates were seeded into fresh Geltrex™-coated wells containing Essential 8™ or mTeSR™ Plus at split ratios of 1:5 to 1:50. StemPro™ Accutase™ (Cat# A1110501, ThermoFisher) was used to create suspensions of single cell iPSCs. Single cells were plated in medium supplemented with 10 µM of the rho-associated kinase inhibitor (ROCKi), Y-27632 (Cat# 100005583, Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) to promote single cell iPSC survival [42]. After thawing from liquid nitrogen stocks, iPSCs were maintained in culture for up to 20 weeks at which point a new vial was thawed. Evaluation of our iPSC cell banks with the hPSC Genetic Analysis Kit (Cat # 07550, STEMCELL Technologies) confirmed normal copy number at various mutation hotspots and assessment with a Mycoplasma PCR Detection Kit (Cat# G238, Applied Biological Materials Inc., Richmond, BC, CAN) indicated that cell stocks are free of mycoplasma.
PANX1−/− iPSCs were created using CRISPR-Cas9 as previously described [12]. Briefly, iPSCs were transfected with the pSpCas9(BB)−2A-GFP plasmid (Cat# 48138, Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA) [43] containing the PANX1-specific sgRNA: 5′-GCTGCGAAACGCCAGAACAG-3′. GFP-expressing single cells were sorted using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and individual clones were examined for PANX1 ablation via Sanger sequencing and Western blotting.
Monolayer Differentiation to Neural Progenitors and Neurons
Human iPSCs were differentiated to neural progenitor cells according to the methodology described by [44] with several modifications. On day 0, singularized iPSCs were plated at a density of 200,000 viable cells/cm2 onto Geltrex™-coated dishes containing Gibco™ PSC Neural Induction Medium (Cat# A1647801, ThermoFisher) supplemented with 10 µM ROCKi. Daily feeds with PSC Neural Induction Medium without ROCKi were administered until day 7 when the cells were singularized and re-plated at a density of 200,000 viable cells/cm2 onto Geltrex™-coated dishes containing Neural Stem Cell (NSC) Expansion Medium supplemented with 10 µM ROCKi. NSC Expansion Medium consists of 49% Neurobasal (Cat# 21103049, ThermoFisher), 49% Advanced DMEM/F12 media (Cat# 12634010, ThermoFisher), and 2% (1X) Neural Induction Supplement (Cat# A16477-01, ThermoFisher). Cells were fed daily with NSC Expansion Medium without ROCKi and seeded into new Geltrex™-coated wells every 7 days. On day 21 or 22 the resultant NPCs were assayed or differentiated further to neurons.
For differentiation to neurons, day 21 or 22 NPCs were passaged as single cells and seeded at 50,000 cells/cm2 onto culture wells coated with 10 µg/mL laminin (Cat# 354232, Corning Inc, Corning, NY, USA) containing Neuron Differentiation Medium supplemented with 10 µM ROCKi. Neuronal Differentiation Medium consists of ~96% Neurobasal (Cat # 21103049, ThermoFisher), 2% (1X) B-27 (Cat #17504044, ThermoFisher), 1% (1X) non-essential amino acids (Cat# 321-011-EL, WISENT), 20 ng/mL brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF; Cat# 78005, STEMCELL Technologies), 20 ng/mL glial cell-derived neurotropic factor (GDNF; Cat# 78058, STEMCELL Technologies), and 200 µM l-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate sesquimagenesium salt hydrate (Cat# A8960, MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA). Half medium changes with Neuron Differentiation Medium were performed every other day for 14 days.
Cerebral organoids
Cerebral organoids were generated using the STEMdiff™ Cerebral Organoid Kit and STEMdiff™ Cerebral Organoid Maturation Kit (Cat# 08570 & 08571, STEMCELL Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the following modifications: On Day 0, 96-well round-bottom plates (Cat# 351177, Corning) were rinsed with a solution of 5% Pluronic™ F-127 (Cat# P2443, MilliporeSigma) prepared in deionized water to confer an anti-adherent coating [45]. On Day 7 the organoids were subjected to high throughput Geltrex™ embedding in Expansion Medium according to Chew et al., with slight modification [46]. Briefly, ice-cold liquid Geltrex™ was added at 1:50 dilution to ice-cold Expansion Medium. The organoids were quickly transferred into the cold Expansion Medium with Geltrex™ and re-plated into a fresh Pluronic™ F-127-coated 6-well dish (Cat# 140685, ThermoFisher).
Human fetal brain preparation
These studies were approved by the Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics board (HREB # 2014.216). Formalin fixed and paraffin embedded samples from a 21–22 pcw human fetal brain were cut to a thickness of 5 µm using a microtome and deposited onto positively charged glass slides (Cat# ER4951PLUS, FisherScientific). The sections were dewaxed with xylene substitute (MilliporeSigma, Cat# 78475) and rehydrated with graded ethanol solutions. After rehydration, the sections were subjected to antigen retrieval and antibody staining for immunofluorescence.
Immunofluorescence imaging
Monolayer cultures grown on Geltrex™ or laminin-coated #1.5 glass coverslips were fixed in 10% buffered formalin (Cat# CA71007-344, VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) for 10 min at room temperature and permeabilized with PBS-T (Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS + 0.1% TWEEN® 20 (Cat# BP337-500, FisherScientific, Waltham, MA, USA)) for 20 min followed by 0.1% Triton™ X-100 (Cat# T5832, MilliporeSigma) in Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS for 10 min. Samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C in primary antibodies diluted in PBS-T with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Cat# 800-095-EL, WISENT Inc.) and 0.1% NaN3 according to Table 4. Secondary antibodies and/or dyes (Table 4) prepared in PBS-T were applied for 2 h at room temperature. All Alexa Fluor® and HRP (horseradish peroxidase) conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from ThermoFisher. Slides were mounted using Mowial®488 reagent with 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) antifade compound according to the formulation described by Cold Spring Harbor [47]. For whole-mount imaging, fixed organoids were permeabilized and stained according to the methodology described above and transferred to an 8-well µ-slide high-end microscopy chamber slide (Cat# 80826, ibidi, Gräfelfing, DEU) for confocal imaging.
Cerebral organoids were fixed overnight (~20 h) in 10% normal buffered formalin and cryogenically prepared according to the methodology described in STEMCELL Technologies’ Document #27171, Version 1.0.0, Nov 2019. Briefly, organoids were first dehydrated in Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS supplemented with 30% sucrose for 1–4 days at 4 °C until the organoids sank. Dehydrated organoids were then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in gelatin embedding solution consisting of 10% sucrose and 7.5% gelatin (Cat# G1890, MilliporeSigma) prepared in Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS. The organoids were then snap frozen in a slurry of dry ice and isopentane followed by cryosectioning at thickness of 14 µm and deposition onto positively charged glass microscope slides (Cat# ER4951PLUS, FisherScientific). For antigen retrieval, sections were placed into a plastic container with pH 6.0 citrate buffer: 0.294% Tri-sodium citrate (dihydrate) (Cat# A12274, Alfa Aesar, Tewksbury, MA, USA) + 0.05% TWEEN® 20 and heated in a food steamer (Hamilton Beach, Glen Allen, VA, USA) for 20 min. Immunostaining and mounting were performed as stated above with antibodies and dyes listed in Table 4.
Phase contrast imaging
Phase contrast images of monolayer cells and organoids were taken on a Zeiss AxioObserver microscope using 5X/0.12 NA A-Plan and 10X/0.25 NA Ph1 objectives. Images from these microscopes were taken in 8-bit greyscale using an Axiocam MRm camera and AxioVision Version 4.8.2 software. All phase contrast imaging equipment is from Carl Zeiss Microscopy (Jena, DEU).
Organoid size measurements
Area measurements from phase contrast images of day 10 cerebral organoids were performed automatically using the batch macro code in FIJI open source software [48]. Area measurements from images that contained debris (fibers and unincorporated cells) were performed manually by tracing around the object’s periphery and excluding debris protuberances. The macro shown here computes object area for entire folders of phase contrast images that were taken on the same microscope, at the same magnification. The macro can be adjusted for different magnifications and microscopes by changing the parameters in “Set Scale”.
macro “Batch Measure” {
dir = getDirectory(“Choose a Directory “);
list = getFileList(dir);
if (getVersion > =“1.40e”)
setOption(“display labels”, true);
setBatchMode(true);
for (i = 0; i < list.length; i++) {
path = dir+list[i];
showProgress(i, list.length);
if (!endsWith(path,”/“)) open(path);
if (nImages > =1) {
run(“8-bit”);
run(“Set Scale…”, “distance=388 known=500 pixel=1 unit=microns global”);
run(“Enhance Contrast…”, “saturated=0.3 normalize”);
run(“Auto Local Threshold”, “method=Phansalkar radius=15 parameter_1 = 0 parameter_2 = 0 white”);
run(“Analyze Particles…”, “size = 40000-Infinity display include add”);
selectWindow(“Results”);
close();
}
}
}
Confocal microscopy and image analysis
Fluorescent confocal images were primarily acquired on an Olympus Fluoview FV10i—W3 confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, JPN) fitted with a 10X/0.4 NA or 60X/1.2 NA lens and Fluoview version 2.1.17 software. The following lasers were used to visualize fluorophores: Hoechst/Brilliant Violet™ 421 (405 nm laser); Alexa Fluor® 488 (473 nm laser); Alexa Fluor® 555/Phalloidin-555 (559 nm laser); Alexa Fluor® 647/Phalloidin-647/To-pro™−3 iodide (635 nm laser). Additional images were taken on an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope fitted with 10×/0.4 NA, 20×/0.75 NA, 40×/0.95 NA or 60×/1.42 NA objectives and the following lasers: 405, 458, 568, and 633 nm. Tiled images of 21–22 pcw human cerebral cortex were taken on a ZEISS LSM 900 with Airyscan 2 fitted with 20X/0.8NA and the following lasers: 405, 488, 561, 640 nm. Images were analyzed using FIJI where fluorescent confocal images were occasionally subjected to equivalent brightness/contrast enhancement to improve image clarity.
We used Manders’ colocalization coefficients to describe the fraction of PANX1 colocalizing with a second target [49, 50]. Manders’ colocalization coefficient values range from 0.0 to 1.0 where values of 0.0 signify no pixel overlap and values of 1.0 denote identical spatial occupation between two signals [50]. We performed colocalization analysis in FIJI using the JACoP plugin with Coste’s automatic thresholding [51]. We report the standard error of the mean for Manders’ colocalization coefficients as indicated in the figure legends.
Whole transcriptome analysis of PANX1 knockout using RNA sequencing
RNA was extracted using the PureLink™ RNA isolation kit (Cat # 12183018A, ThermoFisher) with on column DNase I digestion (Cat# 12185010, ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Purified RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop™ 2000 spectrophotometer (Cat# ND-2000, ThermoFisher), and stored at −80 °C until use. High quality RNA was identified by a ʎ260/280 of ≥ 2.0 and ʎ260/230 of ≥ 2.0.
Whole transcriptome analysis of gene expression differences in PANX1 knockout cells was carried out by RNA sequencing on a Illumina NovaSeq 6000 S4 PE100 (Genome Quebec). Paired end 100 bp reads were assessed for quality control using FastQC (version 0.11.9) [52]. Reads were aligned to the Human hg38 reference genome using RNA-Star (Galaxy Version 2.7.8a) with default settings [53] and transcripts were counted using featureCounts (Galaxy version 2.0.1) [54]. Differential expression of genes between control and PANX1−/− cells were based on a model using the negative binomial distribution with DeSeq2 (Galaxy Version 2.11.40.7), with a Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value of less than 0.05 [55].
Identification of overrepresented groups of genes was carried out using GOseq (Galaxy Version 1.44.0) [56]. The three Gene Ontology (GO) categories were GO:MF (Molecular Function), GO:CC (Cellular Component), GO:BP (Biological Process). Distributions of the numbers of members of a category amongst the differentially expressed genes were determined by the Wallenius non-central hypergeometric distribution. P-values for over representation of the GO term in the differentially expressed genes were adjusted for multiple testing with the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. GOseq was similarly applied for KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway-based enrichment of differentially expressed genes.
Quantitative reverse transcription PCR
High quality RNA was extracted from day 10 control and PANX1−/− organoids as described above. RNA was converted into complementary DNA (cDNA) using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Cat# 4368814, ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Typically, 500 ng of RNA were used per 20 µL cDNA reaction. The resulting cDNA was stored at −30 °C until use. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed as previously described [12]. Primers shown in Table 5 were purchased from IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA). Gene expression for each sample was normalized to GAPDH.
SDS-PAGE & western blot
Cells were lysed with a solution comprising 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% NaN3, 0.1% Triton™ X-100, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM NaF, 2 µg/mL leupeptin, and 2 µg/mL aprotinin. Soluble proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred to a 0.45 µm nitrocellulose membrane (Cat# 1620115, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Primary antibodies (Table 4) were prepared in TBST (15.23 mM Tris HCl, 4.62 mM Tris Base, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% TWEEN® 20, adjusted to pH 7.6) + 3% BSA and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Secondary antibodies conjugated to HRP were prepared in TBST + 3% BSA and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were visualized with Bio-Rad Clarity™ Western ECL Substrate (Cat# 1705061, Bio-Rad) using a ChemiDoc™ Imaging System (Cat# 12003153, Bio-Rad).
Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad PRISM Version 9.4.1. Error bars depict ± standard error of the mean (SEM) when n ≥ 3 biological replicates (independent experiments) unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance for comparisons between 2 groups was determined by unpaired Student’s t-test. Statistical significance for comparisons between 3 or more groups was determined by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey’s multiple comparisons test unless otherwise indicated. A p value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the GEO repository (GSE249624).
References
Davis LK, Gamazon ER, Kistner-Griffin E, Badner JA, Liu C, Cook EH, et al. Loci nominally associated with autism from genome-wide analysis show enrichment of brain expression quantitative trait loci but not lymphoblastoid cell line expression quantitative trait loci. Mol Autism. 2012;3:3.
Shao Q, Lindstrom K, Shi R, Kelly J, Schroeder A, Juusola J, et al. A germline variant in the PANX1 gene has reduced channel function and is associated with multisystem dysfunction. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:12432–43.
Bond SR, Naus CC. The pannexins: past and present. Front Physiol. 2014;5:58.
Zappalà A, Li Volti G, Serapide MF, Pellitteri R, Falchi M, La Delia F, et al. Expression of pannexin2 protein in healthy and ischemized brain of adult rats. Neuroscience. 2007;148:653–67.
Seo JH, Dalal MS, Contreras JE. Pannexin-1 channels as mediators of neuroinflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:5189.
Wicki-Stordeur LE, Dzugalo AD, Swansburg RM, Suits JM, Swayne LA. Pannexin 1 regulates postnatal neural stem and progenitor cell proliferation. Neural Dev. 2012;7:11.
Wicki-Stordeur LE, Swayne LA. Panx1 regulates neural stem and progenitor cell behaviours associated with cytoskeletal dynamics and interacts with multiple cytoskeletal elements. Cell Commun Signal. 2013;11:62.
Prochnow N, Abdulazim A, Kurtenbach S, Wildförster V, Dvoriantchikova G, Hanske J, et al. Pannexin1 stabilizes synaptic plasticity and is needed for learning. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e51767.
Sanchez-Arias JC, Candlish RC, van der Slagt E, Swayne LA. Pannexin 1 regulates dendritic protrusion dynamics in immature cortical neurons. eNeuro. 2020;7:ENEURO.0079–20.2020.
Sang Q, Zhang Z, Shi J, Sun X, Li B, Yan Z, et al. A pannexin 1 channelopathy causes human oocyte death. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019;11:eaav8731. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aav8731.
Hainz N, Beckmann A, Schubert M, Haase A, Martin U, Tschernig T, et al. Human stem cells express pannexins. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:54.
Noort RJ, Christopher GA, Esseltine JL. Pannexin 1 influences lineage specification of human iPSCs. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:659397.
Ray A, Zoidl G, Weickert S, Wahle P, Dermietzel R. Site-specific and developmental expression of pannexin1 in the mouse nervous system. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:3277–90.
Di Lullo E, Kriegstein AR. The use of brain organoids to investigate neural development and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18:573–84.
Renner M, Lancaster MA, Bian S, Choi H, Ku T, Peer A, et al. Self-organized developmental patterning and differentiation in cerebral organoids. EMBO J. 2017;36:1316–29.
Lancaster MA, Renner M, Martin CA, Wenzel D, Bicknell LS, Hurles ME, et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature. 2013;501:373–9.
Lancaster MA, Knoblich JA. Generation of cerebral organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Protoc. 2014;9:2329–40.
Wilson PG, Stice SS. Development and differentiation of neural rosettes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2006;2:67–77.
Brandenberger R, Wei H, Zhang S, Lei S, Murage J, Fisk GJ, et al. Transcriptome characterization elucidates signaling networks that control human ES cell growth and differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:707–16.
Pluta R, Aragón E, Prescott NA, Ruiz L, Mees RA, Baginski B, et al. Molecular basis for DNA recognition by the maternal pioneer transcription factor FoxH1. Nat Commun. 2022;13:7279.
Zhu L, Gomez-Duran A, Saretzki G, Jin S, Tilgner K, Melguizo-Sanchis D, et al. The mitochondrial protein CHCHD2 primes the differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells to neuroectodermal lineages. J Cell Biol. 2016;215:187–202.
Islam MM, Zhang CL. TLX: A master regulator for neural stem cell maintenance and neurogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1849:210–6.
Gyllborg D, Ahmed M, Toledo EM, Theofilopoulos S, Yang S, Ffrench-Constant C, et al. The matricellular protein R-spondin 2 promotes midbrain dopaminergic neurogenesis and differentiation. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;11:651–64.
Li S, Qiu F, Xu A, Price SM, Xiang M. Barhl1 regulates migration and survival of cerebellar granule cells by controlling expression of the neurotrophin-3 gene. J Neurosci. 2004;24:3104–14.
Sayedyahossein S, Huang K, Li Z, Zhang C, Kozlov AM, Johnston D, et al. Pannexin 1 binds β-catenin to modulate melanoma cell growth and metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2021;296:100478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100478.
Mori T, Buffo A, Götz M. The novel roles of glial cells revisited: the contribution of radial glia and astrocytes to neurogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2005;69:67–99.
Kriegstein A, Alvarez-Buylla A. The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:149–84.
Penuela S, Bhalla R, Nag K, Laird DW. Glycosylation regulates pannexin intermixing and cellular localization. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:4313–23.
Shum MG, Shao Q, Lajoie P, Laird DW. Destination and consequences of Panx1 and mutant expression in polarized MDCK cells. Exp Cell Res. 2019;381:235–47.
Turmel P, Dufresne J, Hermo L, Smith CE, Penuela S, Laird DW, et al. Characterization of pannexin1 and pannexin3 and their regulation by androgens in the male reproductive tract of the adult rat. Mol Reprod Dev. 2011;78:124–38.
Freeman TJ, Sayedyahossein S, Johnston D, Sanchez-Pupo RE, O’Donnell B, Huang K, et al. Inhibition of Pannexin 1 Reduces the tumorigenic properties of human melanoma cells. Cancers. 2019;11.
Hirabayashi Y, Itoh Y, Tabata H, Nakajima K, Akiyama T, Masuyama N, et al. The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway directs neuronal differentiation of cortical neural precursor cells. Development. 2004;131:2791–801.
Kim OK, Nam DE, Hahn YS. The Pannexin 1/purinergic receptor P2X4 pathway controls the secretion of MicroRNA-containing exosomes by HCV-infected hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2021;74:3409–26.
Montagne K, Furukawa KS, Taninaka Y, Ngao B, Ushida T. Modulation of the long non-coding RNA Mir155hg by high, but not moderate, hydrostatic pressure in cartilage precursor cells. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0275682.
Wicki-Stordeur LE, Sanchez-Arias JC, Dhaliwal J, Carmona-Wagner EO, Shestopalov VI, Lagace DC, et al. Pannexin 1 differentially affects neural precursor cell maintenance in the ventricular zone and peri-infarct cortex. J Neurosci. 2016;36:1203–10.
Penuela S, Lohman AW, Lai W, Gyenis L, Litchfield DW, Isakson BE, et al. Diverse post-translational modifications of the pannexin family of channel-forming proteins. Channels. 2014;8:124–30.
Swayne LA, Sorbara CD, Bennett SA. Pannexin 2 is expressed by postnatal hippocampal neural progenitors and modulates neuronal commitment. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:24977–86.
Eichmüller OL, Knoblich JA. Human cerebral organoids - a new tool for clinical neurology research. Nat Rev Neurol. 2022;18:661–80.
Menassa DA, Muntslag TAO, Martin-Estebané M, Barry-Carroll L, Chapman MA, Adorjan I, et al. The spatiotemporal dynamics of microglia across the human lifespan. Dev Cell. 2022;57:2127–.e6.
Esseltine JL, Shao Q, Brooks C, Sampson J, Betts DH, Séguin CA, et al. Connexin43 mutant patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells exhibit altered differentiation potential. J Bone Min Res. 2017;32:1368–85.
Beers J, Gulbranson DR, George N, Siniscalchi LI, Jones J, Thomson JA, et al. Passaging and colony expansion of human pluripotent stem cells by enzyme-free dissociation in chemically defined culture conditions. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:2029–40.
Watanabe K, Ueno M, Kamiya D, Nishiyama A, Matsumura M, Wataya T, et al. A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:681–6.
Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, Agarwala V, Scott DA, Zhang F. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:2281–308.
Yan Y, Shin S, Jha BS, Liu Q, Sheng J, Li F, et al. Efficient and rapid derivation of primitive neural stem cells and generation of brain subtype neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2013;2:862–70.
Kurosawa H. Methods for inducing embryoid body formation: in vitro differentiation system of embryonic stem cells. J Biosci Bioeng. 2007;103:389–98.
Chew L, Añonuevo A, Knock E. Generating cerebral organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2389:177–99.
Laboratory CSH. Mowial-DABCO stock solution. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.rec10913 2007.
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82.
Boassa D, Nguyen P, Hu J, Ellisman MH, Sosinsky GE. Pannexin2 oligomers localize in the membranes of endosomal vesicles in mammalian cells while Pannexin1 channels traffic to the plasma membrane. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:468.
Dunn KW, Kamocka MM, McDonald JH. A practical guide to evaluating colocalization in biological microscopy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011;300:C723–42.
Bolte S, Cordelières FP. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J Microsc. 2006;224:213–32.
Wingett SW, Andrews S. FastQ Screen: a tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000Res. 2018;7:1338.
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21.
Heo L, Park H, Seok C. GalaxyRefine: protein structure refinement driven by side-chain repacking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W384–8.
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.
Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R14.
Neel BL, Nisler CR, Walujkar S, Araya-Secchi R, Sotomayor M. Collective mechanical responses of cadherin-based adhesive junctions as predicted by simulations. Biophys J. 2022;121:991–1012.
Carriba P, Davies AM. CD40 is a major regulator of dendrite growth from developing excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Elife. 2017;6:e320442.
Hou H, Obregon D, Lou D, Ehrhart J, Fernandez F, Silver A, et al. Modulation of neuronal differentiation by CD40 isoforms. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;369:641–7.
Masuda T. Contactin-2/TAG-1, active on the front line for three decades. Cell Adh Migr. 2017;11:524–31.
Kastriti ME, Stratigi A, Mariatos D, Theodosiou M, Savvaki M, Kavkova M, et al. Ablation of CNTN2+ pyramidal neurons during development results in defects in neocortical size and axonal tract formation. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:454.
Mancia Leon WR, Spatazza J, Rakela B, Chatterjee A, Pande V, Maniatis T, et al. Clustered gamma-protocadherins regulate cortical interneuron programmed cell death. Elife. 2020;9:e55374.
Carriere CH, Wang WX, Sing AD, Fekete A, Jones BE, Yee Y, et al. The γ-protocadherins regulate the survival of GABAergic interneurons during developmental cell death. J Neurosci. 2020;40:8652–68.
Yasuda S, Tanaka H, Sugiura H, Okamura K, Sakaguchi T, Tran U, et al. Activity-induced protocadherin arcadlin regulates dendritic spine number by triggering N-cadherin endocytosis via TAO2beta and p38 MAP kinases. Neuron. 2007;56:456–71.
Takeuchi C, Ishikawa M, Sawano T, Shin Y, Mizuta N, Hasegawa S, et al. Dendritic spine density is increased in arcadlin-deleted mouse hippocampus. Neuroscience. 2020;442:296–310.
Wang Y, Kerrisk Campbell M, Tom I, Foreman O, Hanson JE, Sheng M. PCDH7 interacts with GluN1 and regulates dendritic spine morphology and synaptic function. Sci Rep. 2020;10:10951.
Xiao Y, Hu M, Lin Q, Zhang T, Li S, Shu L, et al. Dopey2 and Pcdh7 orchestrate the development of embryonic neural stem cells/ progenitors in zebrafish. iScience. 2023;26:106273.
Bhalla K, Luo Y, Buchan T, Beachem MA, Guzauskas GF, Ladd S, et al. Alterations in CDH15 and KIRREL3 in patients with mild to severe intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:703–13.
Zarrei M, Burton CL, Engchuan W, Young EJ, Higginbotham EJ, MacDonald JR, et al. A large data resource of genomic copy number variation across neurodevelopmental disorders. NPJ Genom Med. 2019;4:26.
Wang DY, Luo AF, Bai QR, Gong XL, Zheng Y, Shen Q, et al. VCAM1 labels a subpopulation of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus and contributes to spatial memory. Stem Cell Rep. 2020;14:1093–106.
Wang C, Pan YH, Wang Y, Blatt G, Yuan XB. Segregated expressions of autism risk genes Cdh11 and Cdh9 in autism-relevant regions of developing cerebellum. Mol Brain. 2019;12:40.
Parcerisas A, Pujadas L, Ortega-Gascó A, Perelló-Amorós B, Viais R, Hino K, et al. NCAM2 regulates dendritic and axonal differentiation through the cytoskeletal proteins MAP2 and 14-3-3. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30:3781–99.
Sheng L, Leshchyns’ka I, Sytnyk V. Neural cell adhesion molecule 2 promotes the formation of filopodia and neurite branching by inducing submembrane increases in Ca2+ levels. J Neurosci. 2015;35:1739–52.
Salik D, Hadj-Rabia S, Hohl D, Vahidnezhad H, Youssefian L, Rakosi A, et al. Evaluation of neurodevelopmental symptoms in 10 cases of neonatal ichthyosis and sclerosing cholangitis syndrome. Pediatr Dermatol. 2022;39:590–3.
Sanmaneechai O, Feely S, Scherer SS, Herrmann DN, Burns J, Muntoni F, et al. Genotype-phenotype characteristics and baseline natural history of heritable neuropathies caused by mutations in the MPZ gene. Brain. 2015;138:3180–92.
Speevak MD, Farrell SA. Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1B caused by expansion of a familial myelin protein zero (MPZ) gene duplication. Eur J Med Genet. 2013;56:566–9.
Baker JC, Beddington RS, Harland RM. Wnt signaling in Xenopus embryos inhibits bmp4 expression and activates neural development. Genes Dev. 1999;13:3149–59.
Sharma K, Choi SY, Zhang Y, Nieland TJ, Long S, Li M, et al. High-throughput genetic screen for synaptogenic factors: identification of LRP6 as critical for excitatory synapse development. Cell Rep. 2013;5:1330–41.
Proitsi P, Li T, Hamilton G, Di Forti M, Collier D, Killick R, et al. Positional pathway screen of wnt signaling genes in schizophrenia: association with DKK4. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63:13–16.
Alrefaei AF, Münsterberg AE, Wheeler GN. FZD10 regulates cell proliferation and mediates Wnt1 induced neurogenesis in the developing spinal cord. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0219721.
Tran TM, Sherwood JK, Doolittle MJ, Sathler MF, Hofmann F, Stone-Roy LM, et al. Loss of cGMP-dependent protein kinase II alters ultrasonic vocalizations in mice, a model for speech impairment in human microdeletion 4q21 syndrome. Neurosci Lett. 2021;759:136048.
Zandi PP, Belmonte PL, Willour VL, Goes FS, Badner JA, Simpson SG, et al. Association study of Wnt signaling pathway genes in bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:785–93.
Qu Q, Sun G, Murai K, Ye P, Li W, Asuelime G, et al. Wnt7a regulates multiple steps of neurogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:2551–9.
Qu Q, Sun G, Li W, Yang S, Ye P, Zhao C, et al. Orphan nuclear receptor TLX activates Wnt/beta-catenin signalling to stimulate neural stem cell proliferation and self-renewal. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:31–40.
Ferrari ME, Bernis ME, McLeod F, Podpolny M, Coullery RP, Casadei IM, et al. Wnt7b signalling through Frizzled-7 receptor promotes dendrite development by coactivating CaMKII and JNK. J Cell Sci. 2018;131:jcs216101.
Rosso SB, Sussman D, Wynshaw-Boris A, Salinas PC. Wnt signaling through Dishevelled, Rac and JNK regulates dendritic development. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:34–42.
Lako M, Lindsay S, Bullen P, Wilson DI, Robson SC, Strachan T. A novel mammalian wnt gene, WNT8B, shows brain-restricted expression in early development, with sharply delimited expression boundaries in the developing forebrain. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:813–22.
Yan C, Meng Y, Yang J, Chen J, Jiang W. Translational landscape in human early neural fate determination. Development. 2023;150:dev201177.
Yang SL, Yang M, Herrlinger S, Liang C, Lai F, Chen JF. MiR-302/367 regulate neural progenitor proliferation, differentiation timing, and survival in neurulation. Dev Biol. 2015;408:140–50.
Denaxa M, Kalaitzidou M, Garefalaki A, Achimastou A, Lasrado R, Maes T, et al. Maturation-promoting activity of SATB1 in MGE-derived cortical interneurons. Cell Rep. 2012;2:1351–62.
Levey DF, Gelernter J, Polimanti R, Zhou H, Cheng Z, Aslan M, et al. Reproducible genetic risk loci for anxiety: results from ∼200,000 participants in the million veteran program. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;177:223–32.
Motosugi N, Okada C, Sugiyama A, Kawasaki T, Kimura M, Shiina T, et al. Deletion of lncRNA XACT does not change expression dosage of X-linked genes, but affects differentiation potential in hPSCs. Cell Rep. 2021;35:109222.
Czermiński JT, Lawrence JB. Silencing Trisomy 21 with XIST in neural stem cells promotes neuronal differentiation. Dev Cell. 2020;52:294–308.e3.
Mordaunt CE, Jianu JM, Laufer BI, Zhu Y, Hwang H, Dunaway KW, et al. Cord blood DNA methylome in newborns later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder reflects early dysregulation of neurodevelopmental and X-linked genes. Genome Med. 2020;12:88.
Zhao Z, Zhang D, Yang F, Xu M, Zhao S, Pan T, et al. Evolutionarily conservative and non-conservative regulatory networks during primate interneuron development revealed by single-cell RNA and ATAC sequencing. Cell Res. 2022;32:425–36.
Liu S, Rao S, Xu Y, Li J, Huang H, Zhang X, et al. Identifying common genome-wide risk genes for major psychiatric traits. Hum Genet. 2020;139:185–98.
Ang CE, Ma Q, Wapinski OL, Fan S, Flynn RA, Lee QY, et al. The novel lncRNA lnc-NR2F1 is pro-neurogenic and mutated in human neurodevelopmental disorders. Elife. 2019;8:e41770.
Eze UC, Bhaduri A, Haeussler M, Nowakowski TJ, Kriegstein AR. Single-cell atlas of early human brain development highlights heterogeneity of human neuroepithelial cells and early radial glia. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:584–94.
Penuela S, Bhalla R, Gong XQ, Cowan KN, Celetti SJ, Cowan BJ, et al. Pannexin 1 and pannexin 3 are glycoproteins that exhibit many distinct characteristics from the connexin family of gap junction proteins. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:3772–83.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Dale Laird for generously providing us with the female iPSCs as well as the anti-human PANX1 C-terminus antibody used in this study. We also thank Dr. Jacqueline Vanderluit for advice regarding brain staining panels and Dr. Matthew Parsons for advice and help with FIJI macros. Finally, we thank Henrietta Odiwa for help with literature searches and blinded organoid scoring.
Funding
This study was supported through the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant RGPIN-2019-04345 as well as the Faculty of Medicine Startup Funds to JLE. RJN was supported by a Faculty of Medicine Dean’s Fellowship, the F.A. Aldrich Graduate Fellowship and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Canadian Graduate Scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RJN and HZ performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and assembled the figures. RTF provided technical assistance. Human fetal brain samples were provided by CSM. TJB analyzed the RNAseq data. RJN and JLE wrote and edited the manuscript. JLE oversaw the project. All authors reviewed the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
The research performed as a part of this study were approved by the Newfoundland and Labrador Human Research Ethics Board # 2018.201 and # 2014.216.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Noort, R.J., Zhu, H., Flemmer, R.T. et al. Apically localized PANX1 impacts neuroepithelial expansion in human cerebral organoids. Cell Death Discov. 10, 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-023-01774-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-023-01774-7