Apoptosis is one of the major forms of programmed cell death, and it serves vital biological functions in multicellular animal and plant cells. The core mechanism of apoptosis is highly conserved in metazoans, where the translocation of CED-4/Apaf-1 from mitochondria to the nuclear membrane is required to initiate and execute apoptosis. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of this translocation are poorly understood. In this study, we showed that SAO-1 binds DLC-1 and prevents its degradation to promote apoptosis in C. elegans germ cells. We demonstrated that SAO-1 and DLC-1 regulate CED-4/Apaf-1 nuclear membrane accumulation during apoptosis. Isothermal titration calorimetry-based assay and high-resolution crystal structure analysis further revealed that SAO-1 interacted with DLC-1 to form a 2:4 complex: each of the two β-sheets in the SAO-1 peptide interacted with two DLC-1 dimers. Point mutations at the SAO-1-DLC-1 binding interface significantly inhibited apoptotic corpse formation and CED-4 nuclear membrane accumulation within C. elegans germ cells. In conclusion, our study provides a new perspective on the regulation of CED-4-mediated apoptosis.
Apoptosis is a biological intracellular programmed cell death that eliminates cells that are under developmental or exposed to environmental stimuli within multicellular organisms [1, 2]. The genetics and molecular mechanisms have been extensively studied for decades using model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), Drosophila melanogaster (drosophila), and Danio rerio (zebrafish). In C. elegans, apoptosis occurs during two developmental stages and in two different types of tissues. During embryonic and postembryonic development of the soma, 131 cells are eliminated by programmed cell death ; 113 of these cells die during embryonic development, and 18 die during postembryonic development [4, 5]. In contrast, approximately one-half of the germ cells are eliminated from the germline of adult hermaphrodites . This process is thought to maintain the size of the germline by maintaining a balance between the number of new cells produced via mitosis at the distal end of the gonad and the quality of the oocytes by removing damaged or unwanted germ cells. Alternatively, viral infection, DNA damage, and environmental stress can induce apoptosis [7,8,9,10,11].
The core mechanism of apoptosis is highly conserved in nematode and mammalian cells. In living cells, before apoptosis is triggered, CED-9 (C. elegans)/BCL-2 (human) is located on the outer mitochondrial membrane and binds to CED-4 (C. elegans)/Apaf-1 (human) to inhibit CED-4/Apaf-1 activity. In addition, CED-3 (C. elegans)/Caspase (human) is tethered to the nuclear membrane. When apoptosis is activated, the upstream BH3 protein EGL-1 binds to CED-9/BCL-2. The resultant conformational change in CED-9/BCL-2 leads to the release of CED-4/Apaf-1 from mitochondria and its subsequent translocation to the nuclear membrane . Finally, the CED-3/Caspase protein is activated, and cell death ensues [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. An increasing number of studies have suggested that the translocation of CED-4/Apaf-1 from mitochondria to the nuclear membrane is required to initiate and execute apoptosis [20,21,22]. However, the protein and molecular mechanisms involved in CED-4/Apaf-1 translocation remain unclear.
Some hints into how CED-4/Apaf-1 is translocated to the nuclear membrane can be found in a study on C. elegans dynein light chain 1 (DLC-1). C. elegans DLC-1 is highly conserved with homologous DYNLL2 (dynein light chain LC8-type 2) in mammalian cells. Despite a previous theory suggesting that DLC-1 functions as a cargo adapter, DLC-1 has been reported to participate in apoptosis within human, drosophila and C. elegans cells [22,23,24]. Recent research showed that DLC-1 regulated CED-4 nuclear accumulation during apoptosis in C. elegans germ cells .
The GYF (glycine-tyrosine-phenylalanine) domain is highly conserved (W-X-Y-X6-11-GPF-X4-M-X2-W-X3-GYF) in metazoans. It binds to proteins with a conserved proline-rich sequence [25,26,27,28]. Studies have reported that GYF domain proteins play critical roles in a variety of intracellular processes and regulatory downstream signaling . In C. elegans, the GYF domain-containing protein SAO-1 is a suppressor of APH-1, a component of γ-secretase, that may interact with the E3 ubiquitin ligase subunit SEL-10 to antagonize Notch signaling . However, the cellular and molecular functions of SAO-1 remain largely unclear.
Here, we report on the reevaluation of the function of SAO-1 in C. elegans development. We found that SAO-1 is specifically expressed in primordial germ cells (Z2 and Z3) during the early developmental stages and is highly expressed in the germline throughout the entire C. elegans life cycle. Although SAO-1 is expressed in germ cells, sao-1 depletion does not influence germline development. Moreover, we observed a reduced number of apoptotic corpses, the remains of cells after undergoing programmed cell death, within the germlines of both sao-1 mutant and double sao-1 and ced-9(n1653) mutant worms with accelerated apoptosis. Performing mass spectrometry analysis, we identified DLC-1 as an interacting partner of SAO-1. Indeed, depletion of dlc-1 led to the acquisition of phenotypes observed in sao-1-mutant worms, and SAO-1 inhibited the degradation of DLC-1. Furthermore, we demonstrated that SAO-1 and DLC-1 regulated CED-4 nuclear membrane localization in germ cells. These results indicate that SAO-1 and DLC-1 play critical roles in the core apoptotic pathway. Biochemical and mutational analyses further revealed that SAO-1 directly interacted with DLC-1. Surprisingly, the N-terminal GYF domain in SAO-1 did not play a role in this interaction. DLC-1 bound the C-terminal β-sheet structures of SAO-1. Notably, strains with point mutations in this region showed a reduced apoptosis rate. A Crystallography analysis further predicted that each of these β-sheets binds to one DLC-1. Overall, our results suggest that SAO-1 binds to DLC-1 and then promotes the translocation of CED-4 from the mitochondrial outer nuclear membrane to the nuclear membrane in the C. elegans germline during apoptosis.
SAO-1 is specifically expressed in C. elegans primordial germ cells and germline
To investigate the expression pattern of SAO-1 during embryonic development, we generated a transgenic C. elegans strain expressing GFP::SAO-1 or SAO::RFP. The CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing technique  was employed to insert the GFP-coding DNA sequence into the 5ʹ-end or RFP-coding DNA sequence at the 3’-end of endogenous sao-1 on chromosome V. During early development, GFP::SAO-1 was expressed in all of the embryonic cells and diffused throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 1A). During development, GFP::SAO-1 gradually accumulated in PGL-1::RFP-labeled primordial germ cells from the 1.5-fold stage to the L1 stage (Fig. 1A). PGL-1 is a predicted RNA-binding protein that is associated with P granules in germ cells at all stages of development  Notably, GFP::SAO-1 was specifically expressed in germ cell cytoplasm from the L2 to the adult stage (Fig. 1B). Moreover, SAO-1::RFP exhibited an expression pattern identical to that of GFP::SAO-1 (Fig. S1).
SAO-1 facilitates apoptosis in the C. elegans germline
Because SAO-1 is expressed explicitly in the germline, we wondered whether SAO-1 is required for germline development and oocyte production. Thus, we depleted SAO-1 by RNA interference (RNAi) to examine the germline morphology and analyze the embryonic viability. Differential interference contrast microscopy imaging revealed no significant differences in germline morphology between control (L4440 (RNAi)) and sao-1(RNAi)-treated worms (Fig. S2A, B). In addition, we generated a sao-1-deletion mutant (sao-1(ΔFL)) via CRISPR/Cas9 and replaced the entire endogenous sao-1 with a blue fluorescent protein (BFP) gene. Thus, BFP was a fluorescent marker for the sao-1-deletion mutant worms. Consistent with the RNAi depletion analysis, the morphology of germline and embryonic viability of sao-1(ΔFL)-mutant worms were indistinguishable from that of the control and sao-1(RNAi)-treated worms (Fig. S2A, B). These results indicate that SAO-1 is dispensable for germline development and progeny viability.
Apoptosis is another well-known cellular process that occurs in the germline. Therefore, we examined whether SAO-1 plays a role in the apoptosis pathway of germ cells. We imaged the apoptotic region of the germline expressing CED-1::GFP, an early apoptotic marker, in control, sao-1(RNAi)-treated and sao-1(ΔFL)-mutant worms, and counted the number of apoptotic corpses 48 h after L4 molt (Fig. 2A). In sao-1(RNAi)-treated and sao-1(ΔFL)-mutant worms, the number of apoptotic corpses in the apoptotic region was significantly reduced (Fig. 2B, C). In addition, we expressed SAO-1::RFP in sao-1(ΔFL)-mutant worms using the extrachromosomal array method, and observed that the number of apoptotic corpses was partially restored (Fig. 2B, C). These results suggest that SAO-1 regulates germ cell apoptosis.
Because the absence of SAO-1 inhibits apoptosis of the germ cells, we speculated that SAO-1 may regulate the core apoptosis pathway. If SAO-1 promotes apoptosis through the core pathway, then its depletion should inhibit the accelerated apoptosis rate in ced-9(n1653)-mutant worms. To test this hypothesis, we depleted SAO-1 via RNAi in ced-9(n1653)-mutant worms and found that the number of apoptotic corpses was significantly reduced compared to that in the control (Fig. 2D, E). This result indicates that SAO-1 facilitates apoptosis through the core apoptotic pathway in the C. elegans germline.
SAO-1 depletion inhibits CED-9-mediated nuclear membrane accumulation of CED-4
Next, we investigated whether SAO-1 regulates core apoptotic executioner proteins, such as CED-9 and CED-4. We began by imaging the apoptotic region of the germline expressing RFP::CED-9. We did not observe significant intensity changes in control and sao-1(RNAi)-treated worms (Fig. S3A, B). In turn, depletion of CED-9 did not affect the GFP::SAO-1 intensity (Fig. S3C, D). However, CED-4::GFP intensity was markedly reduced in sao-1(RNAi)-treated, and the sao-1(ΔFL)-mutant (Fig. 2F, G) compared to control nuclear membrane. Furthermore, it has been reported that loss of CED-9 leads to an increased accumulation of CED-4 in the nuclear membrane with concomitant apoptosis acceleration . Thus, we speculated that loss of SAO-1 might inhibit the accumulation of CED-4 on the nuclear membrane after CED-9 depletion. We imaged and analyzed the intensity of CED-4::GFP in ced-9(RNAi), ced-9(RNAi);sao-1(RNAi) and ced-9(RNAi);sao-1(ΔFL) worms. As expected, nuclear membrane-localized-CED-4::GFP increased in the ced-9(RNAi) germ cells (Fig. 2F, G). However, the intensity of CED-4::GFP was significantly reduced in the ced-9(RNAi);sao-1(RNAi) and ced-9(RNAi);sao-1(ΔFL) germ cells (Fig. 2F, G), suggesting that SAO-1 facilitates the nuclear membrane accumulation of CED-4.
SAO-1 stabilizes the cytoplasmic pool of DLC-1
Considering that our results showed that SAO-1 affects apoptosis and contains a GYF domain known to interact with proteins carrying minimal consensus proline-rich sequences [25,26,27,28], we sought to determine SAO-1 binding targets. A mass spectrometry analysis led to the identification of 734 proteins (Table S1). Interestingly, one of these candidates, dynein light chain 1 (DLC-1), has been reported to promote CED-4 accumulation at the nuclear membrane  (similar to our results Fig. 2F, G), and to decrease the number of apoptotic corpses in ced-9(n1653)-mutant worms (Fig. 2D, E). Therefore, we speculated that SAO-1 and DLC-1 function via the same molecular pathway to regulate CED-4 activity. Thus, we determined the subcellular localization of DLC-1::GFP in control, sao-1(RNAi)-treated, and sao-1(ΔFL)-mutant germ cells. In control worms, DLC-1::GFP was diffused throughout the germ cell cytoplasm (Fig. 3A). In sao-1(RNAi)-treated and sao-1(ΔFL)-mutant worms, the intensity of DLC-1::GFP in the germ cell cytoplasm was markedly diminished (Fig. 3A, B), but no differences were observed in germ cell nuclei (Fig. S4A, B) or muscle cells (Fig. S4A, C). Furthermore, the expression of SAO-1::RFP in sao-1(ΔFL)-mutant worms partially rescued DLC-1::GFP intensity in germ cell cytoplasm, as determined using an extrachromosomal array (Fig. 3A, B). These results indicate that SAO-1 may stabilize the cytoplasmic pool of DLC-1 in the germline. One possible explanation for these results is that SAO-1 may inhibit the degradation of DLC-1. To test this possibility, we depleted RPT-4, a proteasome subunit, to decrease proteasome-mediated degradation and measured DLC-1::GFP intensity in control, rpt-4(RNAi), sao-1(ΔFL) and rpt-4(RNAi);sao-1(ΔFL) worms. The germ cell cytoplasm of the worms treated with rpt-4(RNAi) had significantly greater DLC-1::GFP intensity than the control worms (Fig. 3C, D), as predicted. Interestingly, the DLC-1::GFP intensity in rpt-4(RNAi);sao-1(ΔFL) worms was also greater than that in sao-1(ΔFL)-mutant worms (Fig. 3C, D). These results indicate that SAO-1 can protect DLC-1 from proteasome-mediated degradation.
SAO-1 directly interacts with DLC-1
Since mass spectrometry analysis revealed DLC-1 as a candidate binding partner of SAO-1, we tested its ability to interact SAO-1 at the cellular and biochemical levels. For an in vivo analysis, we co-expressed SAO-1::RFP and DLC-1::GFP and imaged germlines via spinning disk confocal microscopy. We found that both fluorescent fusion proteins were diffused within the germ cell cytoplasm and appeared to be colocalized (Fig. 4A). A Pearson’s correlation coefficient of SAO-1::RFP and DLC-1::GFP was 0.7109 (±0.01239), indicating that they were partially colocalized in the cytoplasm.
To further test the apparent colocalization of SAO-1 and DLC-1, we employed fluorescence lifetime image microscopy. Three transgenic fluorescent worm lines were generated for this analysis: DLC-1::GFP, DLC-1::GFP;RFP, and DLC-1::GFP;SAO-1::RFP. The mean fluorescent lifetime of GFP in the worms expressing either DLC-1::GFP (τ is 2.976 ± 0.005457 ns) or DLC-1::GFP;RFP (τ is 2.983 ± 0.009466 ns) was not significantly different (Fig. 4B). Importantly, the GFP mean lifetime in worms co-expressing DLC-1::GFP;SAO-1::RFP was significantly shorter (τ = 2.851 ± 0.007849 ns) compared with that in worms expressing DLC-1::GFP and DLC-1::GFP;RFP (Fig. 4B). Thus, the FRET interactions between SAO-1 and DLC-1 specifically corroborated the colocalization data and supported a direct interaction between SAO-1 and DLC-1 at the cellular level.
We also investigated the physical interaction between DLC-1 and SAO-1 in vitro. We expressed and purified GST-SAO-1 and Trx-His6-DLC-1 for use in pull-down assays. We found that GST-SAO-1 interacted with Trx-His6-DLC-1 (Figs. 4D and S5A), further strengthening our hypothesis of a direct interaction between SAO-1 and DLC-1.
The SAO-1 C-terminus interacts with DLC-1 and facilitates apoptosis
Since the cellular and biochemical data demonstrated that DLC-1 directly interacted with SAO-1, we next examined the DLC-1-binding interface with SAO-1. Six different truncated forms of SAO-1 were constructed for pull-down experiments: (1) ΔGYF, which was missing the GYF domain (residues 12–73); (2) ΔA, which was missing the low-complexity domain A (residues 102–122); (3) ΔB, which was missing the low-complexity domain B (residues 167–181); (4) GYF, which consisted of only the GYF domain (residues 1–73); (5) ΔC, which was missing the C-terminal region (residues 182–226); and (6) C, which was the SAO-1 C-terminal fragment (Fig. 4C). Surprisingly, among these six truncated SAO-1 proteins, only GYF and ΔC could not bound DLC-1 (Figs. 4D and S5A). In contrast, all the truncated SAO-1 proteins with C-terminal fragment interacted with DLC-1 (Figs. 4D and S5A). These results demonstrated that the C-terminal region of SAO-1 but not the GYF domain is essential for DLC-1 interaction.
Considering these results, we next examined the physiological role of the SAO-1 C-terminal region in apoptosis. A transgenic mutant expressing SAO-1 without the C-terminal region (residues 182-226), sao-1(ΔC), was generated via CRISPR/Cas9. The number of apoptotic corpses in the sao-1(ΔC) worms was comparable to that in the sao-1(RNAi)-treated and sao-1(ΔFL)-mutant worms but significantly reduced compared with that in the control worms (Fig. 2B, C). On the other hand, overexpression of SAO-1::RFP in sao-1(ΔC)-mutant worms partially rescued the number of apoptotic cells (Fig. 2B, C). In addition, the intensity of cytoplasmic DLC-1::GFP in the sao-1(ΔC) worms was reduced, similar to that in the sao-1(RNAi) and sao-1(ΔFL) mutant worms (Fig. 3A, B). The reduction in signal intensity was partially restored by the expression of the extrachromosomal array SAO-1::RFP (Fig. 3A, B) and by rpt-4(RNAi) (Fig. 3C, D). These findings indicate that the SAO-1 C-terminal region is required for normal apoptosis in C. elegans germ cells.
To further dissect the putative DLC-1-binding region in SAO-1, we divided the C-terminal region into two parts and constructed two new truncated forms of SAO-1: (1) ΔC1, which was missing residues from 182 to 205 in the C-terminus, and (2) ΔC2, which was missing residues from 206 to 226 in the C-terminus (Fig. 4C). Remarkably, ΔC2 pulled down a significant amount of DLC-1, while ΔC1 lost its ability to bind DLC-1, as observed with SAO-1(ΔC) (Figs. 4D and S5A). Moreover, protein fragments of C1 bound and pulled down DLC-1 (Figs. 4D and S5A). Altogether, these results demonstrate that the C1 half of the C-terminal region of SAO-1 is required for DLC-1 stability and normal apoptosis.
The overall structure of the SAO-1-DLC-1 complex
To assess the SAO-1-DLC-1 binding thermodynamics, we subjected the purified C-terminal region (residues 182–226) of SAO-1 and full-length DLC-1 to isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and measured their binding affinity. We found that SAO-1 bound to DLC-1 with a Kd of 0.5 μM (Fig. 4E). We further resolved the complex structure of SAO-1 (residues 182–205) and DLC-1 at 2.4 Å resolution via crystallography (Table S2). Surprisingly, the SAO-1 peptide and DLC-1 formed a 2:4 complex in the crystal structure (Fig. 4F). Each SAO-1 peptide adopted an extended conformation to interact with two DLC-1 dimers and thereby produced two similar DLC-1-binding sites in SAO-1. At each site, the DLC-1-binding sequence in SAO-1 was folded into a β-strand and was pack within a groove formed in the DLC-1 dimerization interface (Fig. 4G), which closely resembled the target-binding modes of other dynein light chain proteins, such as LC8 [33, 34].
187VAT189 and 199CQT201 of SAO-1 are required for DLC-1-mediated apoptosis
As the complexed structure suggested that SAO-1 bound to DLC-1 at two binding sites, we further investigated whether the two DLC-1-binding sites in SAO-1 are collaborative and necessary for DLC-1 interaction. First, we constructed three GST-labeled SAO-1 proteins with different point mutations in DLC-1-binding sites, SAO-1(187-189-2A), SAO-1(199-201-3A) and SAO-1(187-201-5A) (Fig. 5A) and examined their DLC-1-binding ability via pull-down assay. The DLC-1-binding ability of SAO-1(187-189-2A) and SAO-1(199-201-3A) was partially diminished, while the DLC-1 interaction with SAO-1(187-201-5A) was completed abrogated (Figs. 5B and S5B). These results suggest that the two DLC-1-binding sites in SAO-1 (187VAT189 and 199CQT201) bind each DLC-1 molecule independently.
To further investigate the role of SAO-1 187VAT189 and 199CQT201 at the cellular level, we generated three transgenic strains expressing the following SAO-1 mutations: SAO-1(187-189-2A)::RFP, SAO-1(199-201-3A)::RFP and SAO-1(187-201-5A)::RFP. We first examined the apoptotic behavior of worms expressing each of these three mutants. We found that the number of apoptotic corpses in the germline was significantly reduced in all the mutants (Fig. 5C, D). Next, we examined whether the SAO-1-mutant proteins regulate DLC-1 activity. We co-expressed DLC-1::GFP in the three mutant worm strains and found that the GFP intensities in all the mutant strains were reduced (Fig. 5E, F). The GFP intensity in the SAO-1(187-189-2A)-mutant worms was partially diminished, but the GFP intensity in both the SAO-1(199-201-3A)- and SAO-1(187-201-5A)-mutant worms was suppressed to a level similar to that in the sao-1(ΔFL)-mutant worms (Fig. 5E, F). Since nuclear membrane-localized CED-4 was diminished when DLC-1 or SAO-1 was depleted (Fig. 2F, G), we speculated that nuclear membrane-localized CED-4 would also be impacted in SAO-1-mutant proteins with DLC-1-binding site mutations. Consistent with our previous results, the intensity of CED-4::GFP at the nuclear membrane was markedly reduced in SAO-1(187-189-2A)::RFP, SAO-1(199-201-3A)::RFP and SAO-1(187-201-5A)::RFP strains (Fig. 5G, H). Thus, our results indicate that SAO-1 residues 187VAT189 and 199CQT201 are also necessary for DLC-1 interaction in vivo and that normal apoptosis in the C. elegans germline requires the SAO-1–DLC-1 complex.
Apoptosis is a highly regulated cell death program in metazoans. The core apoptotic proteins are highly conserved, and their roles have been extensively studied. Once apoptosis activated, several caspase precursors, localized initially in mitochondria, are translocated to the nucleus where they execute their apoptotic functions [2, 35,36,37]. Specifically, among the core apoptotic proteins, CED-4 translocated from the mitochondrial membrane to the nuclear membrane to activate CED-3 pro-caspase, and induce apoptosis [12, 19, 20]. This translocation requires the binding of CED-4 with CED-9 at the outer mitochondrial membrane. The ced-4 missense mutant ced-4(n3040), lacking the ability to bind CED-9, displayed diffuse subcellular localization in the cytoplasm and lost the ability to execute apoptosis . However, how CED-4 is recruited to the nucleus remains unclear. A recent report demonstrated that DLC-1 regulated CED-4 nuclear membrane localization in the germ cells of C. elegans, and loss of DLC-1 inhibited apoptosis execution . We obtained similar results with the worms with SAO-1 depleted by the standard RNAi-feeding method, as well as those expressing SAO-1 loss-of-function mutations. The number of apoptotic corpses in worms depleted of SAO-1 activity was reduced, and CED-4 nuclear membrane localization was compromised. Furthermore, the enhanced nuclear membrane localization of CED-4 in ced-9(RNAi), with accelerated apoptosis, was partially restored by the loss of SAO-1. These results indicate that SAO-1 functions in the apoptotic pathway. Importantly, the molecular interaction of SAO-1 and DLC-1 was demonstrated by pull-down assays and found to bind in a 2:4 stoichiometry (SAO-1:DLC-1) in an isothermal titration calorimetry analysis.
SAO-1, a suppressor of aph-1, contains an N-terminal GYF domain and two low-complexity domains in its mid-region. Although the GYF domain is an established motif known to recognize and bind to target proteins with proline-rich sequences, it was dispensable for the SAO-1-DLC-1 interaction. The GYF domain in SAO-1 is believed to facilitate an intramolecular interaction , probably for autoinhibition. However, we determined that a C-terminal region in SAO-1 (C1, residues 182-205) was essential for binding DLC-1. A similar observation has been reported regarding the SAO-1-SEL-10 interaction, in which the SAO-1 C-terminus was necessary for binding SEL-10 .
Although dynein light chain proteins are highly conserved across species from human to worms, given the promiscuous interaction between dynein light chain and diverse motifs in DLC-binding partners , it is difficult to predict the DLC-1-binding sequence in SAO-1. Nevertheless, in this study, we employed crystallographic tools to resolve the DLC-1-SAO-1 complex structure, and we unexpectedly found two DLC-1-binding sites in SAO-1. Our findings suggest that many dynein light chain-mediated interactions remain to be discovered and that structural biology tool will be very useful in these discoveries.
The SAO-1-DLC-1 complex regulates CED-4 nuclear membrane localization. However, there is no evidence to show an association between CED-4 and the SAO-1-DLC-1 complex facilitates CED-4 translocation from mitochondria to the nucleus. Indeed, we obtained results that showed a substantial reduction in cytoplasmic DLC-1 following SAO-1 depletion and in animals that expressed an sao-1-mutant lacking the DLC-1 binding region. Furthermore, inhibition of proteasome-mediated degradation via depletion of the 26S proteasomal protein RPT-4  partially rescued DLC-1 levels in sao-1 mutants. Therefore, we suggest that SAO-1 binds to DLC-1 to prevent DLC-1 degradation and thus maintains an adequate level of DLC-1 for the translocation of CED-4 during apoptosis (Fig. 6). Our in vitro experiments did not indicate an interaction between CED-4 and either SAO-1 or DLC-1. Therefore, the translocation of CED-4 may be indirectly mediated by the SAO-1-DLC-1 complex or DLC-1 alone; further investigation is needed to determine the precise mechanism.
Materials and methods
All C. elegans strains were cultured at 22 °C or 25 °C on Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) plates seeded with Escherichia coli strain OP50. All strains used in this study are listed in Table S3.
Transgenic strain construction
The transgenic strains of endogenous sao-1 (GFP::sao-1::3xFlag, sao-1::TagRFP::3xFlag, sao-1p::GFP::3xFlag, sao-1p::TagRFP::3xFlag, sao-1p::BFP::3xFlag, sao-1(187-189-2A)::TagRFP::3xFlag, sao-1(199-201-3A)::TagRFP::3xFlag and sao-1(187-201-5A)::TagRFP::3xFlag) were generated using CRISPR/Cas9-triggered homologous recombination as described previously . For CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in/out, the Cas9–sgRNA was generated by inserting the target sequence into pDD162. The homologous repair template was generated via insertion of the 5’ and 3’ homology arms into pDD282 or pDD284 by recombination; The C-terminal GFP insertion at an endogenous site in cox-5a was generated by SunyBiotech Company [strain name and genotype: PHX969. cox-5A (syb969)]. Both arSi1[dlc-1p::dlc-1::GFP cb-unc-119(+)] and opIs219[ced-4p::ced-4::GFP unc-119(+)] stains were kind of gifts form professor Anders Olsen (Department of Chemistry and Biosciences, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark).
The extrachromosomal array strain (pie-1p::sao-1::RFP::3Xflag::sao-1 3’UTR) was created by microinjection as follows: The appropriate DNA fragment from N2 genomic DNA was amplified and inserted into modified pCFJ90. The plasmid (50 ng/μl) was then injected into the gonads of young adults. The transgenic worms were screened under the Olympus MVX10 fluorescent microscope. All primers used in this study are listed in Table S4.
RNA interference studies
RNAi experiments were performed using the feeding method . RNAi plasmids were obtained from the RNAi library (Source Bioscience). HT115 bacteria carrying RNAi plasmids were grown in LB with 100 mg/ml ampicillin at 37 °C overnight and then seeded on the RNAi plates at room temperature for 8 h. For sao-1, dlc-1 and ced-9 RNAi, L4-stage worms were placed on the RNAi-feeding plates for 48 h prior to microscopy. For rpt-4 RNAi, L4-stage worms were placed on the RNAi-feeding plates for 24 h prior to microscopy. To deplete the two genes (sao-1and ced-9, dlc-1 and ced-9), the corresponding bacterial strains were mixed at a 1:1 ratio for the combined RNAi experiments.
Embryonic viability assays
Single day 1-adult hermaphrodite was picked to the new NGM plate and cultured at 22 °C. Then, the number of eggs on the surface of the plate was counted after 12 and 24 h. Embryonic viability = Number of eggs (12 h – 24 h)/12 h. Nine hermaphrodites in each condition were analyzed.
For germline morphology analysis, young adult worms were immobilized in M9 containing 1% tetramisole, mounted on a 2% agarose pad, covered with a coverslip and sealed with petroleum jelly. They were visualized using Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) microscope (Olympus BX53) equipped with a ×40/1.4 NA objective lens (Olympus) and DP21 camera. Images were acquired using Olympus cellSens Dimension software.
For fluorescent signal imaging, worms were immobilized in M9 containing 1% tetramisole, mounted on a 2% agarose pad, covered with a coverslip and sealed with petroleum jelly. GFP was visualized using 488 nm excitation and 525–550 nm emission and RFP was visualized using 561 nm excitation and 607–636 nm emission filter sets. Images were acquired with either a spinning-disk confocal microscope (Yokogawa CSU-X1) equipped with a ×60/1.4 NA objective lens (Olympus) and a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, or a laser scanning confocal microscope (Nikon A1R + Symp64) equipped with a ×40/1.4 NA water immersion objective lens (Nikon) and photomultiplier tube (PMT) detector. Images were acquired using MetaMorph software or NLS-Elements AR software respectively.
Fluorescent intensity analysis
For quantification of CED-4::GFP intensity, germline regions were projected into a single image using the batch z-projection process function in ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD). Then, the intensity was measured by average pixel intensity. Five to eight nuclei with the highest fluorescence intensity in each worm were used to measure the nuclear intensity. The following formula was used to calculate the normalized intensity of nuclear CED-4::GFP: INormalized = (INucleus)/(IBackground).
For quantification of cytoplasmic DLC-1::GFP, the intensity within the ROI (20 × 200 pixels) of the middle plane of the loop region was measured. The following formula was used to calculate the normalized intensity of DLC-1::GFP in cytoplasm: INormalized = (ICytoplasmic)/(IBackground).
Nuclear DLC-1::GFP intensity was quantified in nucelei located in the middle plane of the loop region. The following formula was used to calculate the normalized nuclear DLC-1::GFP intensity: INormalized = (INucleus)/(IBackground).
For quantification of muscular DLC-1::GFP intensity, projections of 5 planes maximum at 0.5 μm intervals within muscle cells were captured. The following formula was used to calculate the normalized intensity of muscular DLC-1::GFP: INormalized = (IMuscle)/(IBackground).
The images in these experiments were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health). The statistical significance was determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test to calculate the p values (GraphPad software).
Programmed cell death assays
For germ cells undergoing apoptosis labeled by CED-1::GFP, L4 worms were grown at 25 °C for 48 h and anesthetized with M9 containing 1% tetramisole. For germ cells undergoing apoptosis stained by SYTOTM12, L4 worms were grown at 25 °C for 36 h, and then incubated with 33 µM SYTOTM12 green-fluorescent nucleic acid stain (Invitrogen) in M9 for 3 to 4 h. The worms were then transferred to new NGM or RNAi plates to recover for 1 h and then immobilized in M9 containing 1% tetramisole. Afterward, the worms were mounted on a 2% agarose, covered with a coverslip and sealed with petroleum jelly. Images were acquired by spinning-disk confocal microscope (Yokogawa CSU-X1) equipped with a 60x/1.4 NA objective lens (Olympus) and a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera.
Protein sample preparation
DNA encoding the SAO-1 and the DLC-1 region was PCR-amplified from C. elegans N2 cDNA. The DLC-1 coding sequence was cloned into pET32a modified with an N-terminal thioredoxin Trx-His6 tag for protein expression. The full-length SAO-1 and SAO-1 mutants were cloned into pGEX-4T-1 vectors containing a GST tag. All point mutations were created using site-directed mutagenesis by PCR and confirmed by sequencing. Protein expression plasmids were transformed into BL21 (DE3) competent cells, and the bacteria were grown in LB with ampicillin (100 μg/ml) at 37 °C. Protein expression was induced by the addition of 0.1 mM IPTG and the bacteria were incubated for an additional 4 to 5 h at 37 °C. GST-tagged proteins were subsequently purified using GST beads. Trx-His6-tagged proteins were purified by nickel-affinity chromatography. C. elegans protein extracts were prepared from synchronized hermaphrodites (~48 h after the L4 stage) by sonication in PBS buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4) supplemented with protease inhibitors Cocktail (Roche). Homogenates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was either used immediately for western blotting or snap-froze in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C.
Pull down assays
Purified Trx-His6-tagged protein lysates/worm lysates were incubated with GST-SAO-1, SAO-1 mutant-GST or control GST. The mixture was then incubated at 4 °C for 3 h, and subsequently centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min. The pellet was washed with PBS 3-6 times and then boiled in SDS loading buffer. Western blotting with His antibodies (1:3000, #MA1-21315, Invitrogen) or GST antibodies (1:3000, YM3021, Immuno Way) was conducted according to standard procedures.
Mass spectroscopy assays
LC-MS/MS analysis was carried out as described previously . Briefly, Wild type N2 worm lysates were immunoprecipitated with GST-SAO-1 or control GST. Each immunoprecipitated sample was separation by SDS-PAGE gel and staining with Brilliant Blue G-250, then destaining with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC) and 50% (vol/vol) acetonitrile (ACN) and rehydrated in 100% ACN. Disulfide bonds were reduced with 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). Proteins were then alkylated with 100 mM iodoacetamide and 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and the mixture was incubated with 1 to 2 μl trypsin (Promega) at 37 °C for 16 h. The resulting peptides were desalted with 25 mM ABC, 5% formic acid (FA), 50% ACN and homemade C18-StageTips. The peptides were redissolved in separated 0.1% FA (in water).
Peptide mixtures were analyzed by an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled with a nanospray ion source and an EASY-nLC 1000 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as described . Full scan MS spectra (m/z 350–1550) were acquired in the Orbitrap for a maximum injection time of 100 ms at 120,000 resolutions and an AGC target value of 2E5 charges.
Adult worms were transferred from a petri dish to a cover slide, immobilized in M9 containing 1% tetramisole, then mounted on a 5% agarose pad and sealed with petroleum jelly. GFP was visualized using a Nikon A1R confocal microscope (Nikon A1R + Symp64) equipped with a ×40/1.4 NA water-immersion lens. The fluorescence lifetime imaging capability was provided by PicoHarp time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) electronics. The donor was excited with a 510 nm laser at 20 MHz pulse frequency, and the fluorescence emission of GFP fusion proteins was collected using a 550/49 nm filter. Fluorescence lifetimes were analyzed by SymphoTime64 v2.0 (PicoQuant). The value was considered valid when the chi-squared values were 0.9–1.5.
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) assays
ITC experiments were performed on a PEAQ-ITC Microcal calorimeter (Malvern) at 25 °C. Protein samples (in 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl) were prepared for titrations. Each measurement included 13 titrations. In total, 400 μM DLC-1 was injected into the sample well containing 40 μM SAO-1 protein with a titration speed of 0.5 ml/s.
A time interval of 150 s between injections was used to ensure that the titration peak returned to the baseline. The titration data were processed by MicroCal PEAQ-ITC analysis software and fit by the one-site binding model.
Crystals of SAO-1/DLC-1 complex was obtained by the sitting drop vapor diffusion method at 16 °C. To set up a sitting drop, concentrated protein solution (1 μl, ~15.5 mg/ml,) was mixed with crystallization solution (1 μl, 0.2 M Potassium chloride, 0.05 M HEPES pH 7.5, 35% (v/v) Pentaerythritol propoxylate). Glycerol (30%) was added into the crystallization solution as the cryo-protectant before X-ray diffraction. The X-ray diffraction data were collected at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility beamlines BL17U1 , BL18U1 and BL19U1 , and indexed and scaled by the HKL2000 software package .
The complex structure was determined by molecular replacement in PHASER  using the human dynein light chain structure (PDB id: 3P8M) as the search model. The structural model was refined in PHENIX  and adjusted in COOT . The model quality was checked by MolProbity . Final refinement statistics are listed in Table S2. Figures for all structure were prepared using PyMOL (https://www.pymol.org).
All the data are available in the article and Supplementary Files.
D’Arcy MS. Cell death: a review of the major forms of apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Cell Biol Int. 2019;43:582–92.
Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35:495–516.
Hedgecock EM, Sulston JE, Thomson JN. Mutations affecting programmed cell deaths in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1983;220:1277–9.
Sulston JE, Horvitz HR. Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1977;56:110–56.
Sulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN. The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1983;100:64–119.
Gumienny TL, Lambie E, Hartwieg E, Horvitz HR, Hengartner MO. Genetic control of programmed cell death in the Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodite germline. Development. 1999;126:1011–22.
Derry WB, Putzke AP, Rothman JH. Caenorhabditis elegans p53: Role in apoptosis, meiosis, and stress resistance. Science. 2001;294:591–5.
Ha M, Wei L, Guan X, Li LB, Liu CJ. p53-dependent apoptosis contributes to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-induced hepatotoxicity. Environ Pollut. 2016;208:416–25.
Lettre G, Kritikou EA, Jaeggi M, Calixto A, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, et al. Genome-wide RNAi identifies p53-dependent and -independent regulators of germ cell apoptosis in C. elegans. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11:1198–203.
Ou HL, Schumacher B. DNA damage responses and p53 in the aging process. Blood. 2018;131:488–95.
Wu CW, Wang Y, Choe KP. F-Box protein XREP-4 is a new regulator of the oxidative stress response in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2017;206:859–71.
Chen FL, Hersh BM, Conradt B, Zhou Z, Riemer D, Gruenbaum Y, et al. Translocation of C. elegans CED-4 to nuclear membranes during programmed cell death. Science. 2000;287:1485–9.
Ellis HM, Horvitz HR. Genetic control of programmed cell death in the nematode C. elegans. Cell. 1986;44:817–29.
Aballay A, Ausubel FM. Programmed cell death mediated by ced-3 and ced-4 protects Caenorhabditis elegans from Salmonella typhimurium-mediated killing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:2735–9.
Huang WJ, Jiang TY, Choi WY, Qi SQ, Pang YX, Hu Q, et al. Mechanistic insights into CED-4-mediated activation of CED-3. Gene Dev. 2013;27:2039–48.
Conradt B, Wu YC, Xue D. Programmed cell death during Caenorhabditis elegans development. Genetics. 2016;203:1533–62.
Yan NG, Gu LC, Kokel D, Chai JJ, Li WY, Han AD, et al. Structural, biochemical, and functional analyses of CED-9 recognition by the proapoptotic proteins EGL-1 and CED-4. Mol Cell. 2004;15:999–1006.
Seshagiri S, Miller LK. Caenorhabditis elegans CED-4 stimulates CED-3 processing and CED-3-induced apoptosis. Curr Biol. 1997;7:455–60.
Chen XD, Wang Y, Chen YZ, Harry BL, Nakagawa A, Lee ES, et al. Regulation of CED-3 caspase localization and activation by C-elegans nuclear-membrane protein NPP-14. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23:958–64.
Tzur YB, Margalit A, Melamed-Book N, Gruenbaum Y. Matefin/SUN-1 is a nuclear envelope receptor for CED-4 during Caenorhabditis elegans apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:13397–402.
Wang MX, Itoh M, Li S, Hida Y, Ohta K, Hayakawa M, et al. CED-4 is an mRNA-binding protein that delivers ced-3 mRNA to ribosomes. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2016;470:48–53.
Harders RH, Morthorst TH, Lande AD, Hesselager MO, Mandrup OA, Bendixen E, et al. Dynein links engulfment and execution of apoptosis via CED-4/Apaf1 in C. elegans. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:1012.
Batlevi Y, Martin DN, Pandey UB, Simon CR, Powers CM, Taylor JP, et al. Dynein light chain 1 is required for autophagy, protein clearance, and cell death in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:742–7.
Morthorst TH, Olsen A. Cell-nonautonomous inhibition of radiation-induced apoptosis by dynein light chain 1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e799.
Mayer BJ, Hamaguchi M, Hanafusa H. A novel viral oncogene with structural similarity to phospholipase-C. Nature. 1988;332:272–5.
Freund C, Kuhne R, Yang HL, Park S, Reinherz EL, Wagner G. Dynamic interaction of CD2 with the GYF and the SH3 domain of compartmentalized effector molecules. EMBO J. 2002;21:5985–95.
Nishizawa K, Freund C, Li J, Wagner G, Reinherz EL. Identification of a proline-binding motif regulating CD2-triggered T lymphocyte activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:14897–902.
Kofler M, Motzny K, Beyermann M, Freund C. Novel interaction partners of the CD2BP2-GYF domain. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:33397–402.
Kofler MM, Freund C. The GYF domain. FEBS J. 2006;273:245–56.
Hale VA, Guiney EL, Goldberg LY, Haduong JH, Kwartler CS, Scangos KW, et al. Notch signaling is antagonized by SAO-1, a novel GYF-domain protein that interacts with the E3 ubiquitin ligase SEL-10 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2012;190:1043–U266.
Dickinson DJ, Pani AM, Heppert JK, Higgins CD, Goldstein B. Streamlined genome engineering with a self-excising drug selection cassette. Genetics. 2015;200:1035–49.
Kawasaki I, Shim YH, Kirchner J, Kaminker J, Wood WB, Strome S. PGL-1, a predicted RNA-binding component of germ granules, is essential for fertility in C. elegans. Cell. 1998;94:635–45.
Benison G, Karplus PA, Barbar E. Structure and dynamics of LC8 complexes with KXTOT-motif peptides: swallow and dynein intermediate chain compete for a common site. J Mol Biol. 2007;371:457–68.
Liang J, Jaffrey SR, Guo W, Snyder SH, Clardy J. Structure of the PIN/LC8 dimer with a bound peptide. Nat Struct Biol. 1999;6:735–40.
Jagot-Lacoussiere L, Faye A, Bruzzoni-Giovanelli H, Villoutreix BO, Rain JC, Poyet JL. DNA damage-induced nuclear translocation of Apaf-1 is mediated by nucleoporin Nup107. Cell Cycle. 2015;14:1242–51.
Luo M, Lu ZY, Sun H, Yuan KH, Zhang QC, Meng S, et al. Nuclear entry of active caspase-3 is facilitated by its p3-recognition-based specific cleavage activity. Cell Res. 2010;20:211–22.
Earnshaw WC, Martins LM, Kaufmann SH. Mammalian caspases: structure, activation, substrates, and functions during apoptosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:383–424.
Freund C, Kuhne R, Park S, Thiemke K, Reinherz EL, Wagner G. Structural investigations of a GYF domain covalently linked to a proline-rich peptide. J Biomol Nmr. 2003;27:143–9.
Rapali P, Szenes A, Radnai L, Bakos A, Pal G, Nyitray L. DYNLL/LC8: a light chain subunit of the dynein motor complex and beyond. FEBS J. 2011;278:2980–96.
Song MH, Liu Y, Anderson DE, Jahng WJ, O’Connell KF. Protein phosphatase 2A-SUR-6/B55 regulates centriole duplication in C. elegans by controlling the levels of centriole assembly factors. Dev Cell. 2011;20:563–71.
Timmons L, Fire A. Specific interference by ingested dsRNA. Nature. 1998;395:854.
Moon S, Han D, Kim Y, Jin J, Ho WK, Kim Y. Interactome analysis of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-alpha1 and -beta1 in INS-1 pancreatic beta-cells by affinity purification-mass spectrometry. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4376.
Chen WD, Wang S, Adhikari S, Deng ZH, Wang LJ, Chen L, et al. Simple and integrated spintip-based technology applied for deep proteome profiling. Anal Chem. 2016;88:4864–71.
Wang JC, Zhang XH, Sun Z, Yuan FZ. An efficient intensity-based ready-to-use X-ray image stitcher. J Med Robot Comp. 2018;14:e1925.
Zhang H, Jiang SW, Liao J, Deng JJ, Liu J, Zhang YB, et al. Near-field Fourier ptychography: super-resolution phase retrieval via speckle illumination. Opt Express. 2019;27:7498–512.
Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Method Enzymol. 1997;276:307–26.
Storoni LC, McCoy AJ, Read RJ. Likelihood-enhanced fast rotation functions. Acta Crystallogr D. 2004;60:432–8.
Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D. 2010;66:213–21.
Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60:2126–32.
Davis IW, Leaver-Fay A, Chen VB, Block JN, Kapral GJ, Wang X, et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W375–83.
We thank Andy Loria for help with editing. All the data were obtained using equipment maintained by SUSTech Core Research Facilities. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31671409), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (Grant No. 2020A1515010742) to YCT, and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31870757 and 32170697) to CY.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, D., Yang, H., Jiang, L. et al. Interaction between DLC-1 and SAO-1 facilitates CED-4 translocation during apoptosis in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Cell Death Discov. 8, 441 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-022-01233-9