Abstract
Chronic metabolic stress paradoxically elicits pro-tumorigenic signals that facilitate cancer stem cell (CSC) development. Therefore, elucidating the metabolic sensing and signaling mechanisms governing cancer cell stemness can provide insights into ameliorating cancer relapse and therapeutic resistance. Here, we provide convincing evidence that chronic metabolic stress triggered by hyaluronan production augments CSC-like traits and chemoresistance by partially impairing nucleotide sugar metabolism, dolichol lipid-linked oligosaccharide (LLO) biosynthesis and N-glycan assembly. Notably, preconditioning with either low-dose tunicamycin or 2-deoxy-D-glucose, which partially interferes with LLO biosynthesis, reproduced the promoting effects of hyaluronan production on CSCs. Multi-omics revealed characteristic changes in N-glycan profiles and Notch signaling activation in cancer cells exposed to mild glycometabolic stress. Restoration of N-glycan assembly with glucosamine and mannose supplementation and Notch signaling blockade attenuated CSC-like properties and further enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin. Therefore, our findings uncover a novel mechanism by which tolerable glycometabolic stress boosts cancer cell resilience through altered N-glycosylation and Notch signaling activation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Metabolic stresses occur in various cancer types owing to the limited availability of nutrients and high metabolic demands. Cancer cells develop multiple adaptive mechanisms to limit these metabolic stresses, increase their metabolic flexibility and resilience, and gain survival and stress resistance by rewiring intracellular metabolic and signaling cascades [1].
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a small subpopulation of self-renewing oncogenic cells that are suggested to be responsible for cancer recurrence and therapeutic resistance. Therefore, they have been considered promising targets for curative therapies in cancer. The importance of metabolic stress in controlling the dynamic interconversion between non-stem cancer cells and CSCs has been highlighted in studies of many solid tumors [2,3,4]. To date, however, it is not fully understood how metabolic stress responses contribute to the emergence, maintenance, and therapeutic resistance of CSCs.
Aberrant glycosylation, a hallmark of cancer, plays a key role in modulating cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, immune evasion, and multidrug resistance [5,6,7]. Cancer cells dynamically alter their glycan composition and structure by sensing fluctuations in a wide spectrum of glucose metabolites [8,9,10]. Emerging evidence has shown that CSCs have different glycosylation profiles than non-stem cancer cells [11,12,13,14], suggesting the relevance of glycosylation in the regulation of CSC characteristics.
Hyaluronan (HA) is a linear polysaccharide in the extracellular matrix whose biosynthesis is regulated by three HA synthases (HAS1–3) that link N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc) and D-glucuronic acid (GlcUA) [15, 16]. A growing body of evidence has shown that HA accumulation is correlated with poor prognosis in patients with advanced cancers [17,18,19,20]. In addition to the importance of HA accumulation in cancer progression, recent metabolomic approaches have revealed that HA also regulates CSC-like properties by reprogramming cellular metabolism coupled with its biosynthesis [21].
In this study, we investigated the possible molecular mechanisms underlying the metabolic regulation of CSCs governed by HA biosynthesis. Total cellular glycomics revealed characteristic changes in N-glycan profiles and significantly reduced levels of dolichol lipid-linked oligosaccharides (LLOs) in HA-overproducing breast cancer cells. Owing to the extremely large size of HA, HA biosynthesis consumes large quantities of nucleotide sugar donors, uridine diphosphate (UDP)-GlcNAc and UDP-GlcUA. The current results imply that the alterations in N-glycan profiles found in HA-overproducing cancer cells were an adaptation to the limited availability of glycosylation precursors. Intriguingly, preconditioning with either low-dose tunicamycin (TM) or 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG), both of which partially interfere with LLO biosynthesis and N-glycan assembly, promoted CSC-like traits and chemoresistance, reasonably reproducing the effects of HA overproduction on CSC regulation. RNA-seq transcriptional analysis revealed activation of the Notch signaling pathway in cancer cells exposed to mild glycometabolic stress, and Notch signaling blockade attenuated mammosphere formation and cisplatin resistance in CSCs. Furthermore, the restoration of N-glycan assembly with glucosamine (GlcN) and mannose (Man) supplementation suppressed CSC self-renewal and enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin. Altogether, our study provides novel evidence that tolerable glycometabolic stress promotes CSC-like properties and chemoresistance through altered N-glycosylation and Notch signaling activation.
Results
Total cellular glycomics revealed characteristic changes in N-linked glycoforms associated with HA overproduction
Integration of omics datasets aids in a comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying CSC regulation. In this study, we initially conducted glycomics to identify the glycoform signature characteristic in HA-overproducing cancer cells. The overall glycoforms were compared among three mammary carcinoma cell lines with different HA-producing abilities: parental Neu cancer cells derived from mammary tumors in mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-Neu transgenic (Tg) mice and two primary breast cancer cell lines, HA-low Has2+Neo and HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells, both of which were derived from Has2 conditional Tg mice carrying the Neu transgene [22]. Total cellular glycomics revealed that the N-glycan profile was altered in HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells (Fig. 1A), whereas the profiles were similar in parental Neu and HA-low Has2+Neo cells (Fig. 1B‒D). N-glycans are classified into four categories: paucimannose (PM), high-mannose (HM), and complex/hybrid (C/H). The relative amounts of PM-type N-glycans, which accounted for approximately 11.1% of the total cellular N-glycans in parental Neu cells (Fig. 1B), were significantly increased in HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells (Fig. 1C, D). In parental Neu cells, HM-type glycans, which accounted for approximately 81.0% of total cellular N-glycans (Fig. 1B), were predominantly composed of Man5-9GlcNAc2 glycoforms (Fig. 1C, D). Increased levels of short Man5-7GlcNAc2 glycoforms were evident in HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells (Fig. 1C, D and Supplementary Table S1), which was indicative of impaired N-glycosylation status. The relative amount of hybrid-type N-glycan species with bisecting GlcNAc structures decreased in Has2ΔNeo cells (Fig. 1C, D and Supplementary Table S1). The relative amount of complex-type N-glycans was significantly elevated in an HA production-dependent manner (Fig. 1C). Of the complex-type N-glycans, terminal α2,6-sialylated and core-fucosylated glycan species were enriched in HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells, whereas the relative amount of α2,3-sialylated N-glycan species was relatively high in HA-low Has2+Neo cells (Fig. 1C, D and Supplementary Table S1).
Decreased cellular pools of N-glycan precursors in HA-overproducing cancer cells
HA overproduction may affect protein N-glycosylation through the consumption of nucleotide sugars because the biosynthetic pathways of HA and N-glycans share the common donor substrate UDP-GlcNAc. Therefore, we measured the cellular levels of nucleotide sugars in HA-low Has2+Neo and HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells using ion-pair reversed-phase HPLC (Fig. 2A). Among the measured nucleotide sugars, the cellular levels of UDP-GlcNAc and UDP-GlcUA were significantly lower in Has2ΔNeo cells than in Has2+Neo cells (Fig. 2B). The decreased intracellular concentrations of UDP-GlcNAc and UDP-GlcUA in HA-overproducing cancer cells are considered to be a consequence of their excessive consumption by HA biosynthesis. Interestingly, intracellular levels of UDP-glucose (UDP-Glc) and guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-Man were approximately 3-fold lower in Has2ΔNeo cells than in Has2+Neo cells (Fig. 2B). As illustrated in Fig. 2C, intracellular pools of nucleotide sugars were comprehensively regulated by glucose metabolism. Therefore, the cellular profiles of major nucleotide sugars suggest a countervailing mechanism by which cells can balance the supply of nucleotide sugars in the event of an imbalance.
Reduced levels of UDP-Glc, UDP-GlcNAc, and GDP-Man, all of which are essential substrates for N-glycan precursor biosynthesis (Fig. 2D), may perturb the full assembly of mature LLOs and thereby alter N-glycan biosynthesis. Therefore, we investigated whether HA production affects LLO biosynthesis. As expected, HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells had significantly lower amounts of mature Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-PP-Dol than the parental Neu and HA-low Has2+Neo cells (Fig. 2E‒G). Neu and Has2+Neo cells displayed different profiles of immature LLOs without a significant reduction in the levels of mature LLO (Fig. 2E‒G). Collectively, these findings suggest that the reduced level of mature LLO is responsible for the alterations of N-glycosylation in HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells.
Long-term preconditioning with low-dose TM enhances CSC-like traits and chemoresistance
Given that HA overproduction has been demonstrated to increase the number of CSC-like cells [21], the above findings led us to hypothesize that excess HA production promotes the transition from non-CSCs to CSCs through a reduction in LLO assembly. To determine whether partial inhibition of LLO assembly by long-term preconditioning with low-dose TM affects CSC conversion, we pretreated HA-low Has2+Neo cancer cells for 8 days with TM at varying concentrations and evaluated their effects on CSC-like properties. Growth inhibitory effects were apparent at higher doses of TM (0.2–1.0 μg/ml) and more than 80% of the Has2+Neo cells underwent apoptosis at 1.0 μg/ml. Therefore, HA-low Has2+Neo cells were treated with 0.2 µg/ml TM or less for up to 8 days. Long-term preconditioning with a low dose of TM (0.1 µg/ml) partially interfered with the assembly of mature LLO in Has2+Neo cells, causing it to reach levels comparable to those of HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells (Fig. 3A). Glycomics and hierarchical clustering analysis also demonstrated that preconditioning with low-dose TM (0.1 µg/ml) shifted the N-glycan composition closer to that of Has2ΔNeo cells (Fig. 3B‒D and Supplementary Table S2). In contrast, long-term preconditioning with a relatively high dose of TM (0.2 µg/ml) markedly interfered with the assembly of mature LLO (Fig. 3A) and reduced overall N-glycan production (Fig. 3B‒D and Supplementary Table S2).
Interestingly, low-dose TM preconditioning increased the number of CD44high/CD24low CSC-like cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Fig. 4A, B). Preconditioning dose-dependently shifted the whole TM-treated cell population toward CD24-low expression (Fig. 4A). Removal of TM from the medium reverted the number of CD44high/CD24low CSC-like cells to the levels observed in untreated cells (Fig. 4B), indicating that TM-enhanced CSC-like traits are reversible and not due to clonal selection of TM-resistant cells. GlcN supplementation, which increased the intracellular UDP-GlcNAc pool, partially suppressed the effects of TM preconditioning (Fig. 4C). We evaluated mammosphere formation, reflecting the self-renewal activity, of breast CSCs. Consistent with the increased number of CD44high/CD24low CSC-like cells, preconditioning with low-dose TM (0.05 and 0.1 µg/ml) promoted mammosphere formation to a greater extent than no treatment (Fig. 4D).
2-DG suppresses the synthesis of the glycolytic intermediates, Glc-6P and Fru-6P, and interferes with LLO assembly by inhibiting the function of hexokinase (HK) and glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (PGI) (Fig. 2C). Due to its similarity in structure to Man, 2-DG competes with Man metabolism and affects N-glycosylation by incorporation into LLOs [23, 24]. 2-DG may also prevent LLO biosynthesis and elongation by inhibiting ATP biosynthesis. To ensure that low-dose 2-DG preconditioning reproduced the promoting effects of HA overproduction on CSC-like traits, we treated Has2+Neo cells for 8 days with various doses of 2-DG and evaluated the number of CD44high/CD24low CSC-like cells. Growth inhibitory effects were apparent at 0.2 mM 2-DG and more than 80% of the Has2+Neo cells underwent apoptosis at 2 mM. Therefore, HA-low Has2+Neo cells were treated with a low dose of 2-DG (0.1 mM) for up to 8 days. Consistent with low-dose TM preconditioning, long-term and low-dose 2-DG treatment partially interfered with the assembly of mature LLO in Has2+Neo cells to levels comparable to those observed in HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells (Supplementary Fig. S1A) and shifted the N-glycan composition, as in the case of low-dose TM preconditioning (Supplementary Fig. S1B‒D and Supplementary Table S3). Unlike TM preconditioning, 2-DG preconditioning significantly altered the patterns of C/H-type N-glycans owing to the de novo production of 2-DG-incorporated glycans (Supplementary Fig. S1C and Supplementary Table S3). As expected, low-dose 2-DG preconditioning increased the number of CD44high/CD24low CSC-like cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4E), thereby supporting the important role of glycometabolic stress in CSC regulation.
CSCs are highly resistant to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs and are thought to be responsible for tumor recurrence following treatment. HA-high Has2ΔNeo and HA-low Has2+Neo cancer cells were treated with cisplatin, a platinum-based chemotherapeutic drug, and the numbers of early and late apoptotic cells were determined by dual staining with fluorescent Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI). After exposure to 50 μM cisplatin, HA-low Has2+Neo cells displayed marked increases in the number of both early and late apoptotic cells, in contrast to HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells, which were relatively resistant to this dose (Fig. 5A). We examined the effects of preconditioning with TM or 2-DG on chemoresistance. We chose doses of 0.1 μg/ml TM and 0.1 mM 2-DG for combined treatment with cisplatin because these doses only slightly increased the number of apoptotic cells (Fig. 5B, C). Preconditioning with either low-dose TM or 2-DG significantly alleviated cisplatin-induced apoptosis in HA-low Has2+Neo cancer cells (Fig. 5B, C).
Differential enrichment of gene expression signatures revealed Notch signaling activation under glycometabolic stress
We then carried out RNA-seq transcriptional analysis to identify gene expression signatures under glycometabolic stress. Hierarchical clustering of RNA-seq data (16478 genes) was performed for low-dose TM- and 2-DG-preconditioned cells, and the results revealed similar transcriptomic profiles between the two types of preconditioned cells (Fig. 6A). Only five differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found between TM- and 2-DG-preconditioned cells (Fig. 6B), confirming their similar transcriptomic profiles. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was conducted to compare TM-preconditioned and untreated cells using a hallmark gene set collection from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB). Strikingly, GSEA functional analysis revealed enrichment patterns of gene signatures related to “Notch signaling” and “WNT/β-catenin signaling” in TM-preconditioned cells (Fig. 6C). Similar trends were observed in the comparison of 2-DG-preconditioned cells with untreated cells (Supplementary Fig. S2). These observations were further highlighted using a hierarchical heatmap (Supplementary Fig. S2). Notch3 was identified as the most upregulated gene in the Notch signaling dataset, and DLL1 and Notch1 were commonly upregulated in both the Notch signaling and WNT/β-catenin signaling datasets. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses highlighted enhanced Notch signaling in TM-preconditioned cells, with increased expression of Notch receptors, ligands, and target genes such as Hey and Hes (fold-change (log2) cutoff) (Fig. 6D). Largely consistent with the RNA-seq data, qRT‒PCR demonstrated significant upregulation of Notch3 in TM- and 2-DG-preconditioned cells (Fig. 6E). Interestingly, Notch3 was also upregulated in HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells, indicating that these glycometabolic stresses commonly activate the Notch signaling pathway. Consistent with the marked increase in mRNA levels, cell surface Notch3 expression was significantly increased by preconditioning with low-dose TM and 2-DG (Fig. 6F).
Given that activation of the Notch and WNT/β-catenin signaling pathways has been implicated in CSC regulation [25,26,27,28], glycometabolic stress is likely to modulate CSC-like properties via these signaling pathways. To investigate the role of Notch signaling in CSC function, we treated Has2ΔNeo cells with Notch signaling inhibitors. Notch inhibitors attenuated mammosphere formation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6G). To address whether Notch signaling also promotes chemoresistance, the synergistic effects of a potent Notch inhibitor (LY411575) and cisplatin on cytotoxicity were evaluated using an apoptosis assay. LY411575 enhanced the cytotoxic effects of cisplatin in Has2ΔNeo cells (Fig. 6H). These findings suggest that glycometabolic stress augments CSC-like traits and chemoresistance, partially through Notch signaling activation.
GlcN and Man supplementation partially restores N-glycan assembly in HA-overproducing cancer cells
Reduced nucleotide sugar pools could account for the alterations in N-glycan composition in HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells. To address this possibility, cellular pools of nucleotide sugars were analyzed 24 h after the exposure of Has2ΔNeo cells to exogenous GlcN and/or Man (Fig. 7A). GlcN supplementation significantly increased the cellular UDP-GlcNAc pool (Fig. 7B). Moreover, the cellular levels of UDP-Glc, UDP-GlcUA, and GDP-Man were significantly elevated when Has2ΔNeo cells were exposed to high concentrations of exogenous Man (Fig. 7B). The cellular levels of UDP-GlcNAc or GDP-Man were much higher with each treatment alone than with the combined supplementation of GlcN and Man, suggesting that the combined supplementation may resolve the unbalanced accumulation of each nucleotide sugar by properly processing N-glycan assembly. N-glycan profiles were then analyzed after the exposure of Has2ΔNeo cells to exogenous GlcN and/or Man. The altered N-glycan composition in HA-high Has2ΔNeo cells was partially restored upon increases in the levels of cellular UDP-GlcNAc and GDP-Man (Fig. 7C, D). PM-type N-glycans, whose levels were elevated in Has2ΔNeo cells, were reduced by GlcN and Man supplementation (Fig. 7C, D). Similarly, GlcN and Man supplementation reduced the proportion of whole complex-type N-glycans (Fig. 7D). Notably, these monosaccharides significantly suppressed the synthesis of terminal α2,6-sialylated glycan species (Supplementary Table S4), which was the opposite response to the effects of HA overproduction and low-dose TM preconditioning. Overall, these results suggest that supplementation with GlcN and Man partially restores N-glycan assembly in HA-overproducing cancer cells.
GlcN and Man supplementation suppressed CSC-like properties and augmented the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin
We then questioned whether restoration of N-glycan assembly with GlcN and Man supplementation could suppress CSC-like properties in HA-overproducing cancer cells. To determine if this was the case, we measured the number of CD44high/CD24low CSC-like cells after exposure of Has2ΔNeo cells to exogenous GlcN and/or Man. Treatment with GlcN or Man reduced the number of CD44high/CD24low CSC-like cells in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 7E). Notably, combined supplementation with GlcN and Man had a greater effect on reducing the number of CSC-like cells. Consistent with the reduced number of CSC-like cells, combined supplementation with GlcN and Man significantly reduced the size of mammospheres compared with that of untreated cells (Fig. 7F). With respect to mammosphere formation, GlcN treatment alone had a strong inhibitory effect, which is in line with a previous study [29]. Since GlcN and Man reversed the CSC-like traits that had been promoted by HA overproduction, we finally investigated whether treatment with these hexoses could also affect tumor growth. Has2ΔNeo cells that had been exposed to GlcN and Man were subcutaneously injected into immunodeficient mice, and the tumor-bearing mice were administered the same hexoses both freely in drinking water and three times a week by oral gavage (Fig. 7G). The combined administration of GlcN and Man significantly inhibited tumor growth and further augmented the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin (Fig. 7H, I).
Discussion
This study provides novel mechanistic insights into the molecular basis of metabolic CSC regulation based on the following evidence: (i) chronic metabolic stress triggered by HA production augmented CSC-like traits and chemoresistance by partially impairing nucleotide sugar metabolism, LLO biosynthesis and N-glycan assembly; (ii) low-dose and long-term preconditioning with either TM or 2-DG, which partially interfered with LLO biosynthesis and N-glycan assembly, enhanced CSC-like traits, and chemoresistance; (iii) low-dose TM and 2-DG preconditioning activated the Notch signaling pathway, and Notch signaling inhibition attenuated mammosphere formation and cisplatin resistance of CSCs; and (iv) restoration of N-glycan assembly with GlcN and Man supplementation suppressed CSC-like characteristics and further augmented the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin. These findings support the idea that tolerable glycometabolic stress boosts cancer cell resilience through altered N-glycosylation and Notch signaling activation (Supplementary Fig. S3).
Cancer cells are exposed to persistent metabolic stress because they require a large and continuous nutrient supply to support high metabolic demands. In a cellular environment where the glucose supply is insufficient, cancer cells promote their survival and evasion of apoptosis through the activation of AMPK, phosphorylation of AKT, and production of reactive oxygen species as their adaptive response [30, 31]. The current study further demonstrated that N-glycosylation alterations under tolerable glycometabolic stress activated the Notch and WNT/β-catenin signaling pathways, suggesting the particular importance of protein N-glycosylation for the regulation of these stemness-related signaling pathways.
N-glycosylation is an important post-translational modification for the proper folding, secretion, structural integrity, dynamics, and function of many membrane-bound and secreted proteins. Thus, changes in N-glycosylation patterns profoundly influence diverse cellular signals and gene expression involved in cell growth, survival, and stemness. Analysis of the glycomic datasets in this study revealed that HA overproduction and low-dose TM preconditioning commonly altered N-glycan profiles, primarily due to elevated levels of unconventional PM- and short HM-type N-glycan species, enrichment of terminal α2,6-sialylated and core-fucosylated complex-type N-glycan species, and decreased levels of hybrid-type N-glycan species with bisecting GlcNAc structure.
PM-type N-glycans with a simple structure have traditionally been considered N-glycans characteristic of lower organisms. However, recent bioanalytical and immunohistochemical studies have shown that they are a distinct type of N-glycan that may play a role in many biological processes in mammals, including those related to immunity, development, and cancer [32,33,34]. Interestingly, PM-type N-glycans are restricted to certain pathophysiological conditions such as cancer and specific stem cell populations [35,36,37]. A monoclonal Mannitou antibody that is highly specific for the trimannosidic PM structure stains a subpopulation of cytokeratin-positive cancer cells that may represent CSCs.
Increased levels of short Man5-7GlcNAc2 glycoforms in HM-type N-glycans were evident in HA-overproducing and low-dose TM-preconditioned cancer cells. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) degradation-enhancing α-mannosidase-like (EDEM) family participates in ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD) by trimming the Man9GlcNAc2 glycoform to Man5-7GlcNAc2 glycoforms [38]. Moreover, the Man8GlcNAc2 glycoform is normally translocated to the Golgi apparatus and is progressively trimmed to the Man5GlcNAc2 glycoform via α-mannosidase activity. Thus, consecutive accumulation of Man5-7GlcNAc2 glycoforms may be due to the relative inefficiency of N-glycosylation processes in both the ER and Golgi apparatus.
Several lines of evidence have demonstrated that α2,6 sialylation is essential for the establishment and maintenance of CSCs [11, 13]. ST6GAL1, which is the predominant sialyltransferase responsible for the α2,6 sialylation of N-glycans, plays a crucial role in driving pancreatic CSCs. In this study, we found that both HA overproduction and low-dose TM preconditioning significantly increased terminal α2,6-sialylated and core-fucosylated N-glycan species, implying that this modification may be critical for the enhancement of CSC-like traits. The current RNA-seq data indicated no significant changes in the gene expression levels of three α2,3-sialyltransferases, ST3GAL3, ST3GAL4, and ST3GAL6, and α2,6-sialyltransferase, ST6GAL1, all of which are known to be involved in the synthesis of terminal sialylated N-glycan species in untreated and TM-preconditioned cancer cells (Supplementary Table S5). Therefore, the gene expression of these sialyltransferases does not appear to be the primary cause of changes in altered sialylation patterns. The presence of bisecting GlcNAc in N-glycans interferes with the catalytic activity of sialyltransferases [39] and α2,6 sialylation is less affected by the bisecting GlcNAc structure than α2,3 sialylation [40]. Thus, a moderate reduction in the bisecting GlcNAc structure may preferentially increase the ratio of α2,6-sialylated N-glycans in cancer cells exposed to mild glycometabolic stress.
This study highlighted the prominent role of protein N-glycosylation in integrating metabolic sensing and CSC signaling pathways. Multi-omics successfully identified a glycoform signature common to cancer cells exposed to mild glycometabolic stress, and elucidated the mechanism by which altered N-glycosylation promotes CSC-like properties and chemoresistance through activation of the Notch signaling pathway. The current study further provided evidence that restoration of N-glycan assembly through combined supplementation with GlcN and Man significantly reduces CSC-like traits and exacerbates cisplatin-induced tumor suppression. Therefore, this metabolism-based cancer treatment could be a novel strategy for reducing therapy-resistant CSC populations.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
Parental Neu, HA-low Has2+Neo, and HA-high Has2ΔNeo primary breast carcinoma cells were established and cultured as previously described [41]. Primary mammary cancer cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) under the standard culture conditions of a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
Inhibitor treatment and monosaccharide supplementation
Has2+Neo and Has2ΔNeo cells were seeded at 3.3 × 105 cells/dish into 60 mm cell culture dishes and cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 h in DMEM containing 10% FBS. For glycosylation inhibition, Has2+Neo cells were treated with 0-2.0 μg/ml TM (Sigma‒Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) or 0-5 mM 2-DG (Fujifilm Wako Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) for up to 8 days. To inhibit Notch signaling, Has2ΔNeo cells were treated with the Notch signaling inhibitors, 50 µM LY411575 (Selleck Chemicals LLC, Houston, TX), 50 µM LY3039478 (Selleck Chemicals LLC), 20 µM DAPT (Fujifilm Wako Chemicals), and 1 µM LLNLe (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 7 days. For monosaccharide supplementation, Has2ΔNeo cells were exposed to 500 μM GlcN and/or 20 mM Man for 8 days.
Quantitative analysis of N-glycans by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)
Glycoproteins were extracted as described previously [42]. Briefly, cells were washed 6 times with cold PBS and harvested by scraping in cold PBS. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The cell pellet was used for N-glycan analysis. One hundred micrograms of cellular protein was subjected to reductive alkylation using Tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP) and iodoacetamide. After reductive alkylation, a 4-fold volume of ethanol was added to the reaction mixture and incubated at -30 °C for 3 h. The denatured protein was dissolved in ammonium bicarbonate buffer, followed by trypsin digestion and peptide-N-glycosidase F digestion, as previously reported [42, 43]. Released N-glycan analysis was performed using the glycoblotting method combined with aminolysis-SALSA [44, 45]. The purified glycans were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS using 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB; Sigma‒Aldrich) as a matrix. The relative amount of each glycan was analyzed using Cluster 3.0 software. A heatmap with hierarchical clustering was acquired using the heatmap function in R, version 4.2.2.
UDP-sugar quantification by ion-pair reversed-phase HPLC
UDP-sugars were quantified using ion-pair reversed-phase HPLC as previously described [46, 47].
LLO analysis
LLOs were extracted and analyzed as previously described, with some modifications [48, 49]. Briefly, cells were washed twice with PBS and harvested by scraping in cold PBS. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The cell pellet was stored at −80 °C. The frozen cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 4 mM MgCl2. Two milliliters of methanol followed by 3 ml of CHCl3 were added to the cell suspension. The mixture was then shaken at room temperature for 60 min. After centrifugation at 2,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C, three phases (buffer/methanol upper phase, lower CHCl3 phase, and interphase) were separated. LLOs were then recovered from both the lower CHCl3 phase and the CHCl3/methanol/water (10:10:3) extracts of the interphase materials. The LLOs in the organic phase were lyophilized, and the oligosaccharides (LLO glycans) were released by mild acid hydrolysis in 1 ml of HCl containing 50% isopropanol for 30 min at 100 °C. The released LLO glycans were lyophilized and resuspended in 1 ml of water. Water-soluble oligosaccharides were purified using a Spelco ENVI-Carb column (Sigma-Aldrich) [50]. The purified LLO glycans were labeled with 2-aminopyridine (PA, Fujifilm Wako Chemicals) and further purified using a Monospin Amide column (GL Sciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan). PA-labeled glycans were analyzed by size-exclusion HPLC using a Shodex NH2P-50 4E column (4.6 × 250 mm; Resonac Corp. Tokyo, Japan). Elution was performed using two solvent gradients: solvent A (93% acetonitrile and 7% 50 mM ammonium acetate) and solvent B (20% acetonitrile and 80% 50 mM ammonium acetate). The gradient program was as follows: 0-5 min, isocratic 3% solvent B; 5–8 min, 3-33% solvent B; 8-40 min, 33–71% solvent B; 40-60 min, 71-3% solvent B; 60-90 min, isocratic 0% solvent B. The flow rate was 0.8 ml/min, and the column temperature was room temperature. The fluorescence of the labeled glycans was detected at 310 nm excitation and 380 nm emission wavelengths. PA-labeled glycans were quantitated based on the fluorescence intensity of PA-labeled standards, PA-M3B and PA-M5B, purchased from Masuda Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. (Tokushima, Japan).
PA-labeled LLO glycans in each HPLC peak were identified by MALDI-TOF MS using an Autoflex Speed instrument (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA) (Supplementary Fig. S4). Samples were prepared by spotting 1.0 μl of glycan solution onto the target plate (ground steel) together with 1.0 μl of matrix solution (20 mg/ml DHB) and 1.0 μl of 20 mM ammonium sulfate to shift the signal to [M + H]+. After drying the sample mixture, the glycans were analyzed in the positive reflection mode. Representative MS spectral data were analyzed and annotated using GlycoWorkbench software (https://code.google.com/archive/p/glycoworkbench/) [51].
Flow cytometric analysis
Flow cytometric analysis was performed as previously described [47]. To identify CSC-like populations, cells were stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD44 (eBioscience, 12-0441-82, San Diego, CA) and FITC-conjugated anti-CD24 antibodies (eBioscience, 11-0241-82). To detect cell surface Notch3, the cells were stained with a PE-conjugated anti-Notch3 antibody (BioLegend, HMN3-133, San Diego, CA). The distribution of labeled cells was identified by FACS Melody (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and analyzed using FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).
Mammosphere formation assay
The mammosphere formation assay was performed as previously described [52]. For inhibitor treatment, Has2+Neo cells were pretreated with 0.05 or 0.1 µg/ml TM for 8 days. For monosaccharide supplementation, Has2ΔNeo cells were cultured in medium with or without 500 µM GlcN and/or 20 mM Man for 8 days. After treatment with TM or monosaccharides, aliquots of 5,000 Has2+Neo cells or 10,000 Has2ΔNeo cells were seeded into 24-well ultralow attachment plates (Corning, Corning, NY) in serum-free minimal essential medium Ham’s F-12 supplemented with 20 ng/ml bFGF (Fujifilm Wako Chemicals), 20 ng/ml EGF (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), and B27 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA) (spheroid-forming medium). The cells were further cultured in medium containing the same concentrations of TM or monosaccharides for 7 days; the medium was replenished with fresh medium every 2-3 days. At the end of culture, the number of spheres with diameters greater than 25 µm was counted under a phase-contrast microscope.
Apoptosis assay
The apoptosis assay was performed by Annexin V-FITC and PI staining using a MEBCYTO apoptosis kit (MBL Co., Ltd., Nagoya, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The distribution of labeled cells was identified using FACS Melody (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software.
qRT‒PCR
Total RNA was extracted from breast cancer cells using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription was performed by random priming using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara Bio) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qRT‒PCR was performed on a QuantStudio3 Flex Real-time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a TaqMan gene expression assay of Notch 3 (Mm00435270_m1, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and Probe qPCR Mix (Takara Bio). Relative amounts of GAPDH mRNA were measured using TaqMan rodent GAPDH control reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Relative mRNA expression was analyzed using the comparative Ct method and normalized to GAPDH expression.
RNA‒seq analysis
Total RNA was extracted from Has2+Neo and TM- and 2-DG-preconditioned cells using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity and concentration of RNA samples were measured using a NanoDrop 2000c instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The RNA integrity number (RIN) was evaluated using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Quality-controlled RNA samples with an RIN score of 7 or greater were then subjected to library preparation. cDNA sequencing libraries were prepared using a NEBNext® Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (for PolyA selection, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) and a NEBNext® UltraTMII Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (for strand-specific libraries, New England Biolabs). RNA sequencing was performed in paired-end 150 bp mode using a NovaSeq 6000 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA) by Rhelixa Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).
Analyses of transcriptional data
The reads from RNA-seq data were qualified using FastQC 0.11.7 and filtered using Trimmomatic 0.38 [53, 54]. The read count data were normalized to transcripts per million (TPM), and gene expression was measured using the RaNA-seq cloud platform (https://ranaseq.eu/) [55]. The DEG analysis was conducted with the integrated differential expression and pathway (iDEP) online platform (ver. 0.94) (iDEP Platform http://bioinformatics.sdstate.edu/idep/) [56]. The DESeq2 algorithm was used to filter the DEGs. Genes with |log2FC | ≥ 2 and FDR < 0.1 (false discovery rate (FDR)) were defined as DEGs. Pathway enrichment analyses of DEGs were conducted using the KEGG (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/) metabolic pathway database based on iDEP.
GSEA
GSEA was performed using a hallmark gene set collection from MSigDB and GSEA software (version: 4.2.3; http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/downloads.jsp) [57, 58]. GSEA results were evaluated based on the normalized enrichment score (NES).
Animal experiment
Has2ΔNeo cells (5.0 ×105 cells) were precultured in DMEM with or without 500 µM GlcN and 20 mM Man for 8 days and injected bilaterally into the fourth mammary fat pads of BALB/c nude mice (three–four animals per group, 8-week-old female, CLEA Japan, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The mice were given 0.5% (w/v) GlcN and 20% (w/v) Man as drinking water and 100 µL of the same drinking water by oral gavage every other day. Tumor size was measured every 2 days using a digital caliper. The tumor volume was calculated using the following formula: length × width2 × 0.5. Cisplatin (5 mg/kg in 200 µL) was injected intraperitoneally at the indicated times. Tumors were excised 24 days after inoculation with cancer cells. Animal care and all experimental procedures were performed in biosafety level 2 animal facilities according to established guidelines approved by the Kyoto Sangyo University Ethics Committee.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22 software. All experiments were performed at least three times. The results are reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). A significant difference was confirmed when the P value < 0.05.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. The RNA-seq data for this study have been deposited in the DDBJ Sequenced Read Archive under accession number DRA015712.
References
DeBerardinis RJ, Chandel NS. Fundamentals of cancer metabolism. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1600200
Daniel Y, Lelou E, Aninat C, Corlu A, Cabillic F. Interplay between Metabolism Reprogramming and Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer Stem Cells. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:1973.
Sancho P, Barneda D, Heeschen C. Hallmarks of cancer stem cell metabolism. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:1305–12.
Lee E, Yang J, Ku M, Kim NH, Park Y, Park CB, et al. Metabolic stress induces a Wnt-dependent cancer stem cell-like state transition. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1805.
Nardy AF, Freire-de-Lima L, Freire-de-Lima CG, Morrot A. The Sweet Side of Immune Evasion: Role of Glycans in the Mechanisms of Cancer Progression. Front Oncol. 2016;6:54.
Very N, Lefebvre T, El Yazidi-Belkoura I. Drug resistance related to aberrant glycosylation in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9:1380–402.
Taniguchi N, Kizuka Y. Glycans and cancer: role of N-glycans in cancer biomarker, progression and metastasis, and therapeutics. Adv Cancer Res. 2015;126:11–51.
Dennis JW, Nabi IR, Demetriou M. Metabolism, cell surface organization, and disease. Cell. 2009;139:1229–41.
Carvalho-Cruz P, Alisson-Silva F, Todeschini AR, Dias WB. Cellular glycosylation senses metabolic changes and modulates cell plasticity during epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Dev Dyn. 2018;247:481–491.
Scheper AF, Schofield J, Bohara R, Ritter T, Pandit A. Understanding glycosylation: Regulation through the metabolic flux of precursor pathways. Biotechnol Adv. 2023;67:108184.
Khan T, Cabral H. Abnormal Glycosylation of Cancer Stem Cells and Targeting Strategies. Front Oncol. 2021;11:649338.
Walker MR, Goel HL, Mukhopadhyay D, Chhoy P, Karner ER, Clark JL, et al. O-linked α2,3 sialylation defines stem cell populations in breast cancer. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabj9513.
Schultz MJ, Holdbrooks AT, Chakraborty A, Grizzle WE, Landen CN, Buchsbaum DJ, et al. The Tumor-Associated Glycosyltransferase ST6Gal-I Regulates Stem Cell Transcription Factors and Confers a Cancer Stem Cell Phenotype. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3978–88.
Buffone A, Weaver VM. Don’t sugarcoat it: How glycocalyx composition influences cancer progression. J Cell Biol. 2020;219:e201910070.
Weigel PH, Hascall VC, Tammi M. Hyaluronan synthases. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:13997–4000.
Itano N, Sawai T, Yoshida M, Lenas P, Yamada Y, Imagawa M, et al. Three isoforms of mammalian hyaluronan synthases have distinct enzymatic properties. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:25085–92.
Anttila MA, Tammi RH, Tammi MI, Syrjänen KJ, Saarikoski SV, Kosma VM. High levels of stromal hyaluronan predict poor disease outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2000;60:150–5.
Auvinen P, Tammi R, Parkkinen J, Tammi M, Agren U, Johansson R, et al. Hyaluronan in peritumoral stroma and malignant cells associates with breast cancer spreading and predicts survival. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:529–36.
Heldin P, Lin CY, Kolliopoulos C, Chen YH, Skandalis SS. Regulation of hyaluronan biosynthesis and clinical impact of excessive hyaluronan production. Matrix Biol. 2019;78-79:100–17.
Ropponen K, Tammi M, Parkkinen J, Eskelinen M, Tammi R, Lipponen P, et al. Tumor cell-associated hyaluronan as an unfavorable prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998;58:342–7.
Chanmee T, Ontong P, Izumikawa T, Higashide M, Mochizuki N, Chokchaitaweesuk C, et al. Hyaluronan Production Regulates Metabolic and Cancer Stem-like Properties of Breast Cancer Cells via Hexosamine Biosynthetic Pathway-coupled HIF-1 Signaling. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:24105–20.
Koyama H, Hibi T, Isogai Z, Yoneda M, Fujimori M, Amano J, et al. Hyperproduction of hyaluronan in neu-induced mammary tumor accelerates angiogenesis through stromal cell recruitment: possible involvement of versican/PG-M. Am J Pathol. 2007;170:1086–99.
Ahadova A, Gebert J, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Kopitz J, Kloor M. Dose-dependent effect of 2-deoxy-D-glucose on glycoprotein mannosylation in cancer cells. IUBMB Life. 2015;67:218–26.
Ma C, Tsai HY, Zhang Q, Senavirathna L, Li L, Chin LS, et al. An Integrated Proteomic and Glycoproteomic Investigation Reveals Alterations in the N-Glycoproteomic Network Induced by 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose in Colorectal Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:8251.
Xiu M, Wang Y, Li B, Wang X, Xiao F, Chen S, et al. The Role of Notch3 Signaling in Cancer Stemness and Chemoresistance: Molecular Mechanisms and Targeting Strategies. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:694141.
Zhang Q, Lu C, Fang T, Wang Y, Hu W, Qiao J, et al. Notch3 functions as a regulator of cell self-renewal by interacting with the β-catenin pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015;6:3669–79.
Kim MJ, Kim AR, Jeong JY, Kim KI, Kim TH, Lee C, et al. Correlation of ALDH1 and Notch3 Expression: Clinical implication in Ovarian Carcinomas. J Cancer. 2017;8:3331–42.
Fang CH, Lin YT, Liang CM, Liang SM. A novel c-Kit/phospho-prohibitin axis enhances ovarian cancer stemness and chemoresistance via Notch3-PBX1 and β-catenin-ABCG2 signaling. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27:42.
Hosea R, Hardiany NS, Ohneda O, Wanandi SI. Glucosamine decreases the stemness of human ALDH(+) breast cancer stem cells by inactivating STAT3. Oncol Lett. 2018;16:4737–44.
Dayem AA, Choi HY, Kim JH, Cho SG. Role of oxidative stress in stem, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Cancers (Basel). 2010;2:859–84.
Magaway C, Kim E, Jacinto E. Targeting mTOR and Metabolism in Cancer: Lessons and Innovations. Cells. 2019;8:1584.
Stavenhagen K, Laan LC, Gao C, Mehta AY, Heimburg-Molinaro J, Glickman JN, et al. Tumor cells express pauci- and oligomannosidic N-glycans in glycoproteins recognized by the mannose receptor (CD206). Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78:5569–85.
Leijon H, Kaprio T, Heiskanen A, Satomaa T, Hiltunen JO, Miettinen MM, et al. N-Glycomic Profiling of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas Separates Metastatic and Nonmetastatic Disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:3990–4000.
Angel PM, Drake RR, Park Y, Clift CL, West C, Berkhiser S, et al. Spatial N-glycomics of the human aortic valve in development and pediatric endstage congenital aortic valve stenosis. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2021;154:6–20.
Zipser B, Bello-DeOcampo D, Diestel S, Tai MH, Schmitz B. Mannitou Monoclonal Antibody Uniquely Recognizes Paucimannose, a Marker for Human Cancer, Stemness, and Inflammation. J Carbohydr Chem. 2012;31:504–18.
Balog CI, Stavenhagen K, Fung WL, Koeleman CA, McDonnell LA, Verhoeven A, et al. N-glycosylation of colorectal cancer tissues: a liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry-based investigation. Mol Cell Proteom. 2012;11:571–85.
Dahmen AC, Fergen MT, Laurini C, Schmitz B, Loke I, Thaysen-Andersen M, et al. Paucimannosidic glycoepitopes are functionally involved in proliferation of neural progenitor cells in the subventricular zone. Glycobiology. 2015;25:869–80.
Ninagawa S, Okada T, Sumitomo Y, Kamiya Y, Kato K, Horimoto S, et al. EDEM2 initiates mammalian glycoprotein ERAD by catalyzing the first mannose trimming step. J Cell Biol. 2014;206:347–56.
Nakano M, Mishra SK, Tokoro Y, Sato K, Nakajima K, Yamaguchi Y, et al. Bisecting GlcNAc Is a General Suppressor of Terminal Modification of N-glycan. Mol Cell Proteom. 2019;18:2044–57.
Lu J, Isaji T, Im S, Fukuda T, Kameyama A, Gu J. Expression of N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase III Suppresses α2,3-Sialylation, and Its Distinctive Functions in Cell Migration Are Attributed to α2,6-Sialylation Levels. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:5708–20.
Koyama H, Kobayashi N, Harada M, Takeoka M, Kawai Y, Sano K, et al. Significance of tumor-associated stroma in promotion of intratumoral lymphangiogenesis: pivotal role of a hyaluronan-rich tumor microenvironment. Am J Pathol. 2008;172:179–93.
Fujitani N, Furukawa J, Araki K, Fujioka T, Takegawa Y, Piao J, et al. Total cellular glycomics allows characterizing cells and streamlining the discovery process for cellular biomarkers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:2105–10.
Kita Y, Miura Y, Furukawa J, Nakano M, Shinohara Y, Ohno M, et al. Quantitative glycomics of human whole serum glycoproteins based on the standardized protocol for liberating N-glycans. Mol Cell Proteom. 2007;6:1437–45.
Furukawa J, Shinohara Y, Kuramoto H, Miura Y, Shimaoka H, Kurogochi M, et al. Comprehensive approach to structural and functional glycomics based on chemoselective glycoblotting and sequential tag conversion. Anal Chem. 2008;80:1094–101.
Hanamatsu H, Nishikaze T, Miura N, Piao J, Okada K, Sekiya S, et al. Sialic Acid Linkage Specific Derivatization of Glycosphingolipid Glycans by Ring-Opening Aminolysis of Lactones. Anal Chem. 2018;90:13193–9.
Nakajima K, Kitazume S, Angata T, Fujinawa R, Ohtsubo K, Miyoshi E, et al. Simultaneous determination of nucleotide sugars with ion-pair reversed-phase HPLC. Glycobiology. 2010;20:865–71.
Chokchaitaweesuk C, Kobayashi T, Izumikawa T, Itano N. Enhanced hexosamine metabolism drives metabolic and signaling networks involving hyaluronan production and O-GlcNAcylation to exacerbate breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:803.
Harada Y, Nakajima K, Masahara-Negishi Y, Freeze HH, Angata T, Taniguchi N, et al. Metabolically programmed quality control system for dolichol-linked oligosaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:19366–71.
Massarweh A, Bosco M, Iatmanen-Harbi S, Tessier C, Amana L, Busca P, et al. Brefeldin A promotes the appearance of oligosaccharyl phosphates derived from Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-PP-dolichol within the endomembrane system of HepG2 cells. J Lipid Res. 2016;57:1477–91.
Harada Y, Nakajima K, Li S, Suzuki T, Taniguchi N. Protocol for analyzing the biosynthesis and degradation of N-glycan precursors in mammalian cells. STAR Protoc. 2021;2:100316.
Ceroni A, Maass K, Geyer H, Geyer R, Dell A, Haslam SM. GlycoWorkbench: a tool for the computer-assisted annotation of mass spectra of glycans. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:1650–9.
Chanmee T, Ontong P, Mochizuki N, Kongtawelert P, Konno K, Itano N. Excessive hyaluronan production promotes acquisition of cancer stem cell signatures through the coordinated regulation of Twist and the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)-Snail signaling axis. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:26038–56.
Cock PJ, Fields CJ, Goto N, Heuer ML, Rice PM. The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:1767–71.
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.
Prieto C, Barrios D. RaNA-Seq: Interactive RNA-Seq analysis from FASTQ files to functional analysis. Bioinformatics. 2019;36:1955–6.
Ge SX, Son EW, Yao R. iDEP: an integrated web application for differential expression and pathway analysis of RNA-Seq data. BMC Bioinforma. 2018;19:534.
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–50.
Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003;34:267–73.
Acknowledgements
We appreciate the technical assistance provided by our laboratory members, particularly Daiki Nishigaki, Takahiro Kawama, Nanami Honjo, and Natsumi Hiraoka. We thank Dr. Yoichiro Harada for providing the detailed protocol for the LLO analysis. This work was supported by grants from JSPS KAKENHI (JP18K06671 and JP22K06605 to NI), the Mizutani Foundation for Glycoscience (to NI), and the Extramural Collaborative Research Grant of Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University (to NI and NG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SI, TK, HH, J-IF, and NI conceptualized and designed the project. SI, TK, YT, YM, and KN conducted HPLC analysis. HH, IY, TN, and J-IF conducted the glycomic analysis. AI, MK, SA, AS, and AS conducted flow cytometric analysis, mammosphere formation and apoptosis assays. TK, YT, and YM performed qRT‒PCR analysis. SI, SM, UR, and NI performed RNA-seq analysis. SI and NI performed animal studies. SI, TK, HH, J-IF, and NI conducted statistical analysis of the data. SI, TK, HH, J-IF, and NI wrote the manuscript with the support of all co-authors. KN and NG contributed to data discussions, provided critical insights and advice, and edited the manuscript. NG and NI acquired funding for the project. All authors agreed on the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Dr Jean-Ehrland Ricci
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Iwamoto, S., Kobayashi, T., Hanamatsu, H. et al. Tolerable glycometabolic stress boosts cancer cell resilience through altered N-glycosylation and Notch signaling activation. Cell Death Dis 15, 53 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06432-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06432-z