Abstract
Ferroptosis, a novel regulated cell death induced by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, plays an important role in tumor development and drug resistance. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are associated with various types of cancer. However, the precise roles of many lncRNAs in tumorigenesis remain elusive. Here we explored the transcriptomic profiles of lncRNAs in primary CRC tissues and corresponding paired adjacent non-tumor tissues by RNA-seq and found that LINC00239 was significantly overexpressed in colorectal cancer tissues. Abnormally high expression of LINC00239 predicts poorer survival and prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Concurrently, we elucidated the role of LINC00239 as a tumor-promoting factor in CRC through in vitro functional studies and in vivo tumor xenograft models. Importantly, overexpression of LINC00239 decreased the anti-tumor activity of erastin and RSL3 by inhibiting ferroptosis. Collectively, these data suggest that LINC00239 plays a novel and indispensable role in ferroptosis by nucleotides 1–315 of LINC00239 to interact with the Kelch domain (Nrf2-binding site) of Keap1, inhibiting Nrf2 ubiquitination and increasing Nrf2 protein stability. Considering the recurrence and chemoresistance constitute the leading cause of death in colorectal cancer (CRC), ferroptosis induction may be a promising therapeutic strategy for CRC patients with low LINC00239 expression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Despite tremendous improvements in detection and treatment, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most aggressive malignancies of the digestive system, with the third highest incidence and second highest mortality worldwide [1, 2]. Uncontrollable cell proliferation and continuous inhibition of cell death are common causes of poor prognosis in patients with CRC [3, 4]. Unfortunately, the molecular and genetic alterations in these processes remain elusive.
Cell death is strictly regulated by complex intracellular and extracellular signals, which are essential for various biological processes (including redox homeostasis imbalance, development, and disease) [5]. Ferroptosis is a new form of regulated cell death that involves the accumulation of iron-dependent lipid peroxides (lipid-ROS) and causes fatal cell damage [6]. Central to controlling redox homeostasis in carcinogenesis, NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) has attracted much attention due to its important role in mediating adaptation to oncogene-stimulated oxidative stress [7]. Nuclear translocation and constitutive activation of Nrf2 protect cancer cells from death and induce cell proliferation [8]. In particular, ferroptosis, a new type of regulated cell death (RCD) in the presence of iron-driven lipid peroxidation, has been implicated in Nrf2-mediated carcinogenesis [9, 10]. Mounting evidence indicates that ferroptosis exerts an antitumor effect on tumor progression [11,12,13], yet the biological and mechanistic details underlying this complex process remain unclear.
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of transcripts that lack protein-coding capacity and have lengths greater than 200 nucleotides [14, 15]. Tens of thousands of lncRNAs may be encoded in the human genome, but the precise roles of a large number of them remain elusive [16]. Recent studies have shown that lncRNAs are powerful and multifunctional cell regulators during tumorigenesis and development [17]. LncRNAs play important roles in the occurrence, metastasis, and drug resistance of colorectal cancer [18]. Depending on their subcellular localization, lncRNAs function in various forms [19]. Nuclear lncRNAs are involved in transcriptional regulation in cis and trans, regulation of chromosomal interactions, transcription factor trapping, chromatin circularization, gene methylation, transcription factor recruitment, and chromatin modification [20,21,22]. Cytoplasmic lncRNAs can regulate target protein levels by interacting with proteins, mRNAs, or micro-RNAs [23]. Accumulating evidence has revealed that lncRNAs are important regulators of oxidative stress during the development of tumors [24,25,26]. However, the more specific roles of lncRNAs in CRC under ferroptosis remain largely unknown.
In this study, we confirmed that LINC00239 is a ferroptosis suppressor in CRC. LINC00239 promotes CRC proliferation by interacting with Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1), causing instability of the Keap1/Nrf2 complex. Therefore, LINC00239 enhanced Nrf2 protein stability by suppressing its ubiquitination and promoted CRC development. Importantly, Nrf2 also promotes LINC00239 transcription in a positive feedback manner. LINC00239 inhibition in combination with ferroptosis induction might be a promising therapeutic strategy for CRC patients.
Materials and methods
Patients and follow-up
The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Air Force Military Medical University (Shaanxi, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study. Cohort I included freshly sampled CRC tissues with healthy adjacent tissues collected between January 2005 and December 2007 from 174 adult patients who underwent surgery at Xijing Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University (Xi’an, China). Cohort II included CRC tissue samples from 180 adult CRC patients at the Shanghai Outdo Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). All patients were staged pathologically based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union against Cancer criteria. All the research was carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975. None of the patients had received radiotherapy or chemotherapy prior to surgery.
Cell culture and treatments
Human CRC cell lines RKO, HCT116, CaCo2, SW480, SW620, and normal intestinal epithelial cells (FHC) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). All cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin, and streptomycin (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The cell lines were tested for mycoplasma contamination before use to ensure that they were mycoplasma-free. All drugs were ordered from MedChemExpress unless otherwise indicated. All drug use was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were purchased from TsingKe Technology (Beijing, China). Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to transfect siRNA (50 nM) into colorectal cells, while nonspecific siRNA (50 nM) was used as a negative control. The sequences of siRNAs are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
RNA isolation and qRT-PCR
For RNA-seq and qRT-PCR analysis, a MiniBEST Universal RNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRa, Japan) was used to isolate RNA, and a one-step PrimeScript RT-PCR kit was used to reverse transcribe 1 µg of total RNA (TaKaRa, Japan). TB Green® Fast qPCR Mix (TaKaRa, Japan) was used for quantitative PCR with three repeated reactions with the primers listed in Supplementary Table S2. Using the ddCt method to compare with the 18 S level, the relative RNA expression level was calculated and normalized with respect to the control sample [27].
Plasmids and cloning
Gibson cloning was used for all vectors. For gene knockdown, we cloned the sgRNA in Supplementary Table S1 into the pLentiRNACRISPR-hU6-DR-RfxCas13 (Addgene no. 138147) vector [28]. For gene overexpression analysis, the human LINC00239, Nrf2, and Keap1 full-length open-reading frames were subcloned into plenti-CMV-Luc-Puro (Addgene no. 17477) [29]. All constructs were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. All primers used for molecular cloning and primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S2.
In vivo experiments
To clarify the role of LINC00239 in vivo, we used 4-week-old male BALB/c nude mice provided by the Experimental Animal Center of the Air Force Military Medical University. HCT116 or SW620 cells (1 × 107 cells) were injected subcutaneously into the right flanks of these mice to establish a CRC xenograft model. One week after the injection of cells, the volume of xenografts was continuously monitored (once a week). Four weeks later, the xenografts were removed, and the weights were measured. All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai Air Force Military Medical University.
Immunoblotting
The cells were collected by scraping and lysed for 15 min on ice in lysis buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm and 4 °C for 15 min. SDS loading buffer was added to the supernatant, and then the sample was heated at 95 °C for 5 min before loading on the polyacrylamide gel. Western blotting was performed as previously described. The antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
RNA FISH
Single-molecule RNA FISH was performed as previously described [27]. The probe was designed by the online probe designer at https://www.biosearchtech.com/products/rna-fish/ and labeled with Cy3. The probe for LINC00239 is listed in Supplementary Table S1.
Immunofluorescence staining
For Keap1 and Nrf2 immunofluorescence staining assays, cells were fixed with 2% PFA at room temperature for 15 min. Then, the cells were permeated with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 15 min on ice and washed three times with PBS. The cells were then subjected to a blocking step and incubated with anti-Keap1 or anti-Nrf2 antibody at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with a fluorescent secondary antibody. The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI, and images were obtained by a laser confocal microscope [30]. The antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP)
Co-IP was performed as described before [31]. In short, the input and immunoprecipitation samples were analyzed by western blotting using various antibodies at the specified dilution: Keap1 antibody, Nrf2 antibody, and normal rabbit IgG. The antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
The procedure was performed as previously described [32]. In short, the cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature and neutralized by adding glycine to a final concentration of 0.125 M for 5 min. After washing twice with cold PBS, the cells were collected and suspended in cold lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 85 mM KCl, 0.5% NP40, 5 mM EDTA, 0.25% Triton, and protease inhibitor). After 15 min of incubation on ice, the nuclei were harvested, resuspended in cold lysis buffer, and sonicated to obtain 200–500 base pair DNA fragments. Magnetic beads coated with specific antibody or IgG control were added to the lysis buffer and incubated overnight. The next day, the beads were washed 7 times with washing buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 500 mM LiCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, and 0.7% sodium deoxycholate), then washed once with TE buffer, after which the protein–DNA complex was eluted. After reverse cross-linking at 55 °C overnight, DNA was extracted and analyzed by qRT-PCR. All primers are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
In the immunohistochemical analysis of our own cohort, samples were independently assessed by two pathologists blinded to the clinical characteristics of the patients on the basis of staining intensity and region of protein expression in the samples. The percentage of positive cells was scored as 0 (<10%), 1 (10–40%), 2 (40–70%), or 3 (>70%), and the immunostaining intensity was scored as 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining), 2 (moderate staining), or 3 (strong staining). The final immune response score was calculated as staining intensity score × percentage of positive cells. A score of 0-6 indicates that the expression of the target is considered “LINC00239 (−)”, while a score of 7–9 is considered “LINC00239 ( + )”.
Data analyses and statistics
Relative RNA levels were normalized to 18 S RNA levels. All statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism 8.0 software package and SPSS 22.0 statistical software package (Abbott Laboratories, USA) for Windows. Data are presented as the means ± SD of at least three independent experiments. nsP > 0.05, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, Student’s t test.
Reporting summary
Further information on experimental design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.
Results
Overexpression of LINC00239 promotes CRC proliferation and indicates a worse prognosis
To investigate the role of lncRNAs in colorectal cancer, we first examined lncRNA expression profiles in three colorectal cancer tissue samples and adjacent normal tissues using the RNA-seq. 71 lncRNAs were upregulated, and 215 were downregulated by more than five-fold (Padj. < 0.05)), including LINC00239 (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Table S4). Using 5′- and 3′-rapid amplification of the cDNA ends, LINC00239 was found to be 652-nucleotide (nt) long (Supplementary Fig. S1A, B). The gene is identical to the sequence LINC00239 in the UCSC database. To further address the clinical significance of LINC00239, analysis of the public database (GEPIA) [33] showed upregulation of LINC00239 in CRC tissues (Fig. 1B), and this upregulation predicted poor Overall survival (OS) (Fig. 1C). At the same time, we also found that the Disease-free survival (DFS) show a significant difference (Fig. 1D). Consistent with public database, we examined the LINC00239 expression of CRC and adjacent nontumor specimens in two human CRC cohorts by ISH staining. The LINC00239 levels were markedly upregulated in CRC compared with that in adjacent nontumor tissues (Fig. 1E, F). The elevated LINC00239 expression was associated with worse tumor size and higher AJCC stage (Table 1). CRC patients with positive LINC00239 expression had shorter overall survival than CRC patients with negative expression of LINC00239 (Fig. 1G, H). To investigate the biological function of LINC00239 in CRC, we first used qRT-PCR to analyze the expression of LINC00239 in different CRC cells and normal intestinal epithelial cells (FHC). The results showed that LINC00239 expression was upregulated in all CRC cell lines compared with the FHC cell line (Fig. 1I). Then, HCT-116 cells with relatively low LINC00239 expression and SW620 cells with relatively high LINC00239 expression were selected to construct HCT-116-OE-00239 and SW620-sg-00239#1 stable cell lines (Fig. 1J and Supplementary Fig. S1C). Upregulation of LINC00239 expression elevated the HCT-116 cells’ proliferation abilities. Downregulation of LINC00239 expression suppressed the SW620 cells’ proliferation capabilities (Fig. 1G, L). Similarly, an in vivo tumorigenesis experiment also showed a larger tumor size and heavier tumor weight in mice injected with LINC00239-overexpressing HCT-116-OE-00239 cells. In contrast, a smaller tumor size and lighter tumor weight were observed with SW620-sg-00239#1 cells, further confirming the oncogenic role of LINC00239 in CRC (Fig. 1M–O).
LINC00239 upregulates colorectal cancer cell growth by inhibiting ferroptosis
To determine the molecular mechanism underlying LINC00239-mediated CRC proliferation, RNA-seq were used to analyze the gene expression changes in LINC00239-knockout CRC cell lines. The results showed that a large number of genes mediating oxidative stress were significantly downregulated in SW620 cells with LINC00239 knockout (Fig. 2A–C). Ferroptosis involves the accumulation of iron-dependent lipid peroxides (lipid-ROS) and leads to lethal cellular damage [34]. The process of ferroptosis is divided into upstream (ROS production) and downstream (execution of ferroptosis) [35]. We induced ferroptosis using erastin in HCT-116-OE-00239 and SW620-sg-00239#1. Because GSG/GSSG, ROS, lipid ROS, and Fe2+ are essential for ferroptosis process, we further measured their concentrations in erastin- and ferrostatin-1-treated CRC cells. We found that knockout of LINC00239 sensitized cells to ferroptosis, as evidenced by reduced GSH/GSSG levels, accompanied by enhanced ROS accumulation, lipid ROS, accumulation of Fe2+ and an increased percentage of cell death upon erastin induction (Fig. 2D–H). The ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin-1 partly reversed erastin-induced ferroptosis in SW620 LINC00239-knockout cells (Fig. 2D–H). Conversely, ectopic expression of LINC00239 showed resistance to ferroptosis upon treatment with erastin plus ferrostatin-1 (Fig. 2D–H). Moreover, overexpression of LINC00239 enhanced clonogenicity and cell viability upon ferroptosis induction. Conversely, knockout of LINC00239 impaired both the clonogenicity and cell viability induced by ferroptosis induction (Fig. 2I, J). 3D tumor spheroid experiments further validated the inhibitory ferroptotic effect of LINC00239, as indicated by lower numbers of dead cells in LINC00239-overexpressing HCT116 cells and higher numbers of dead cells in LINC00239-knockout SW620 cells stained with SYTOX Green (Fig. 2K, L). Taken together, these results indicate that LINC00239 acts as an oncogenic lncRNA in CRC.
LINC00239 interacts with Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1
Because lncRNAs may function through their interactions with other proteins, we hypothesized that LINC00239 might interact with certain cellular proteins to regulate biological functions. To explore the mechanism of LINC00239 in ferroptosis regulation and CRC proliferation, we first used RNA pulldown assays (Fig. 3A) and mass spectrometry analysis, we identified a LINC00239-protein complex in cell lysates generated from SW620 cells, antisense of LINC00239 served as a negative control in these experiments. Among the many proteins identified Kelch Like ECH Associated Protein 1(Keap1) were the most interesting (Fig. 3B and supplementary Table S5). We validated the presence of Keap1 in an intact complex from independent RNA pulldown assays in SW620 cells (Fig. 3C). Moreover, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays confirmed an enrichment of LINC00239 in the complexes precipitated with the antibody against Keap1 in HCT-116 cell (Fig. 3D). In addition, FISH staining also revealed colocalization between LINC00239 and Keap1 (Fig. 3E). To further clarify the molecular mechanism of the interaction between LINC00239 and Keap1, we used the RNAfold database to predict the secondary structure of LINC00239 (Fig. 3F). An in vitro RNA pull-down assay, followed by western blot analysis, confirmed that the 1–315 nt sequence of LINC00239 is essential for binding to Keap1 (Fig. 3G). Furthermore, protein domain deletion mutant studies demonstrated that LINC00239 interacts with the 322–609 amino acid (aa) region of Keap1 (Fig. 3H, I). Taken together, these findings suggest that Keap1 is a proven and novel binding partner of LINC00239.
The LINC00239–Keap1 interaction in the cytoplasm is critical for the activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway
Numerous regulators are known to have significant impacts on intracellular anti-ferroptosis defenses. NFE2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is the key regulator of anti-ferroptosis. Keap1 brings Nrf2 into the Cul3-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase complex through the Kelch domain, leading to the rapid proteasomal degradation of Nrf2 [36, 37]. Nrf2 can regulate a large number of downstream effectors against ferroptosis, including FTH1, GCLC, GCLM, HO-1, NQO1, and GPX4, and others, via binding enhancer sequences termed “antioxidant-response elements” (AREs) [38]. Interestingly, we found that LINC00239 interacts with the Kelch domain of the Keap1 protein (Fig. 3H, I). Therefore, we hypothesized that LINC00239 can inhibit the ubiquitination of Nrf2 by interacting with the Kelch domain. To determine whether these interactions could influence the stability of the Keap1/Nrf2 complex, we first examined the expression of Nrf2 and Keap1 in CRC by western blotting. The results revealed that although dysregulation of LINC00239 did not influence Keap1 expression, upregulation of LINC00239 significantly increased Nrf2 protein expression, whereas diminished expression of LINC00239 suppressed Nrf2 levels (Fig. 4A). In addition, dysregulation of LINC00239 did not affect the mRNA expression of Nrf2 (Fig. 4B), suggesting that the interaction between LINC00239 and Keap1 mainly leads to instability of the Keap1/Nrf2 complex. Co-IP experiments further validated that upregulation of LINC00239 inhibited the stability of the Keap1/Nrf2 complex, leading to decreased expression of Nrf2, and vice versa (Fig. 4C). Once Nrf2 dissociates from Keap1, it translocates into the nucleus. We next evaluated the expression and distribution of Nrf2. Western blot analysis revealed that overexpression of LINC00239 induced Nrf2 translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, especially in the presence of erastin. Conversely, knockout of LINC00239 strongly inhibited Nrf2 translocation into the nucleus under erastin treatment (Fig. 4D, E). Immunofluorescence staining further confirmed that LINC00239 promotes Nrf2 expression and nuclear translocation (Fig. 4F, G). To determine whether dysregulation of LINC00239 affects ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of Nrf2, we treated SW620-sg-00239#1 cells and the corresponding controls with the proteasome inhibitor MG132. Western blot analysis revealed that MG132 significantly restored Nrf2 protein levels in SW620-sg-00239#1 cells (Fig. 4H). Moreover, the Nrf2 protein half-life was obviously prolonged when LINC00239 was overexpressed, whereas the Nrf2 protein half-life was obviously decreased when LINC00239 was downregulated (Fig. 4I, J), suggesting that LINC00239 can regulate Nrf2 via its protein degradation. In addition, the polyubiquitination of Nrf2 was substantially decreased when LINC00239 was overexpressed, while Nrf2 ubiquitination was dramatically increased when LINC00239 was silenced (Fig. 4K).
Taken together, these data indicated that LINC00239 can stabilize Nrf2 by suppressing its ubiquitination in CRC. Previous studies have shown that the transcriptional activity of antioxidant-response elements (AREs) can reflect the activity of the Nrf2 signaling pathway [38]. To further verify that the anti-ferroptosis function of LINC00239 was mediated through the upregulation of Nrf2 signaling, we performed ARE luciferase reporter assays. The results showed that ARE luciferase expression was significantly reduced in LINC00239 knockdown cells (Supplementary Fig. 1D). Conversely, overexpression of LINC00239 significantly enhanced the expression level of ARE luciferase (Supplementary Fig. 1D). Simultaneously, we also examined the downstream effectors known to be regulated by Nrf2 and found that overexpression of LINC00239 induced the expression of FTH1, GCLC, GCLM, HO-1, NQO1, and GPX4, especially after exposure to erastin (Supplementary Fig. 1E). Conversely, knockout of LINC00239 inhibited FTH1, GCLC, GCLM, HO-1, NQO1, and GPX4 expression (Supplementary Fig. 1F). All these findings suggest that the dysregulation of LINC00239 affects the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of Nrf2.
LINC00239 regulates ferroptosis by modulating the expression of Keap1/Nrf2 signaling pathway
To further demonstrate whether Keap1/Nrf2 signaling is involved in the ferroptosis-suppressing activity of LINC00239, we constructed HCT-116-OE-00239-Keap1, HCT-116-OE-00239-sgNrf2#1, SW620-sg-00239#1-sgKeap1#1, and SW620-sg-00239#1-Nrf2 cells and their control cells.(Supplementary Fig. 2). ML334 is a potent, cell-permeable NRF2 activator that acts by inhibiting the Keap1-NRF2 protein interaction [39]. Nrf2-IN-1 is an inhibitor of nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). Nrf2-IN-1 is developed for the research of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [40]. Compared with the control treatment, knockout of Keap1 or treatment with the Keap1 inhibitor ML334, as well as overexpression of Nrf2 in SW620-sg-00239#1 cells, enhanced cell viability upon erastin exposure, whereas overexpression of Keap1, knockout of Nrf2 or treatment with the Nrf2 inhibitor Nrf2-IN-1 decreased cell viability under erastin conditions (Fig. 5A, B and Supplementary Fig. 4A, B), indicating that upregulation of Nrf2 or downregulation of Keap1 suppressed ferroptosis in the absence of LINC00239. Consistently, increased GSH/GSSG levels, reduced ROS accumulation, lipid peroxidation, accumulation of ferrous ions, percentage of cell death, and increased clonogenicity were also observed in SW620-sg-00239#1 cells with Keap1 knockout or treated with the Keap1 inhibitor ML334, as well as overexpression of Nrf2 under treatment with erastin, and this anti-ferroptotic effect could be further enhanced when the cells were simultaneously treated with erastin plus ferrostatin-1 (Fig. 5C–G and Supplementary Fig. 4C–F, K). Conversely, decreased GSH/GSSG levels, increased ROS accumulation, lipid peroxidation, accumulation of ferrous ions, and percentage of cell death and decreased clonogenicity were observed when Keap1 was overexpressed, when Nrf2 was knocked out or when HCT116-OE-LINC00239 cells were treated with the Nrf2 inhibitor Nrf2-IN-1 and erastin and this pro-ferroptotic effect was partly reversed when the cells were simultaneously treated with erastin plus ferrostatin-1 (Fig. 5H and Supplementary Figs. 3A–D and 4C–J, L). In addition, upregulation of Nrf2 or downregulation of Keap1 in SW620-sg-00239#1 cells induced FTH1, GCLC, GCLM, HO-1, NQO1, and GPX4 expression. Conversely, knockout of Nrf2 or upregulation of Keap1 suppressed FTH1, GCLC, GCLM, HO-1, NQO1, and GPX4 expression (Supplementary Fig. 3E, F).
In vivo tumorigenesis experiments also showed larger tumor sizes and heavier tumor weights in SW620-sg-00239#1-sgKeap1#1 and SW620-sg-00239#1-Nrf2 cells than in SW620-sg-00239#1 cells. In contrast, smaller tumor sizes and lighter tumor weights were observed in HCT116-OE-LINC00239-Keap1 and HCT116-OE-LINC00239-sgNrf2#1 cells, further confirming that Keap1/Nrf2 signaling is involved in the ferroptosis-suppressing activity of LINC00239 in CRC development (Fig. 5I–N). All these findings indicated that Keap1/Nrf2 signaling is the major mediator of the ferroptosis-suppressing activity of LINC00239.
Nrf2 mediates positive feedback transcript activation of LINC00239 in CRC
Our above data show that LINC00239 can inhibit ferroptosis through the Keap1/Nrf2 signaling pathway. We previously found that erastin could enhance LINC00239 expression in CRC cells in vitro. However, we did not know how erastin influenced LINC00239 expression. To clarify the transcription factors that can mediate the expression of LINC00239 under erastin treatment, we analyzed the transcription factor binding sequence of the human LINC00239 gene promoter and found that LINC00239 contains three predicted Nrf2-targeting motifs in the promoter region (Fig. 6A). ChIP-qRT-PCR and luciferase reporter assays further demonstrated that the specific Nrf2-targeting sequence is located between 300 and 700 bp of the LINC00239 promoter region (Fig. 6B–E). In parallel to this result, mutation of the Nrf2 binding sites in this fragment decreased Nrf2-dependent activation of the LINC00239 reporter (Fig. 6F). To further investigate whether Nrf2 could positively regulate feedback transcript activation of LINC00239 in CRC, we treated CRC cells with erastin or ferrostatin-1, respectively, and detected the expression level of LINC00239 by real-time quantitative PCR. The results show that the expression level of LINC00239 can be increased under the treatment of erastin, and the expression level of LINC00239 can be decreased after adding ferrostatin-1 (Fig. 6G, J). In addition, we upregulated Nrf2 or downregulated Keap1 in HCT-116 cells. The results showed that direct upregulation of Nrf2 or knockout of Keap1, which promotes Nrf2 translocation into the nucleus, led to a significantly increased level of LINC00239 (Fig. 6H, I). Similarly, direct knockout of Nrf2 or overexpression of Keap1, which represses Nrf2 translocation into the nucleus, led to a significantly decreased level of LINC00239 (Fig. 6K, L). Overall, Nrf2 could mediate the positive feedback transcript activation of LINC00239 in CRC.
LINC00239 expression has a positive correlation with Nrf2 and GPX4 expression in CRC tissues
The expression of LINC00239, Nrf2, and GPX4 were analyzed in two independent CRC cohorts. IHC and ISH staining that both Nrf2 and GPX4 showed a positive correlation with LINC00239 expression in two CRC cohorts (Fig. 7A–C, F–H). In addition, Kaplan–Meier analysis exhibited that CRC patients who had positive co-expression of either LINC00239/Nrf2 or LINC00239/GPX4 showed the lowest survival times in both CRC cohorts (Fig. 7D, E, I–J). To further investigate the roles of LINC00239 and Keap1/Nrf2 signal pathway in CRC, we detected the expression of LINC00239 and Nrf2 target gene (GPX4, GCLM, GCLC, FTH1, HO-1, and NQO1 in fresh CRC samples. The data revealed that LINC00239 is upregulated in CRC tissues compared with adjacent nontumor tissues and positively correlated with GPX4, GCLM, GCLC, FTH1, HO-1, and NQO1 levels (Fig. 7K–M and Supplementary Fig. 5). This work reveals a LINC00239-mediated ferroptosis regulatory mechanism in which oncogenic activation of the Keap1/Nrf2 signaling pathway suppresses ferroptosis in CRC. We confirmed that upregulation of LINC00239 promotes CRC proliferation by interacting with Keap1, causing instability of the Keap1/Nrf2 complex, thus enhancing Nrf2 protein stability and promoting CRC development. In turn, Nrf2 further promotes LINC00239 transcription, making LINC00239 a promising therapeutic strategy for CRC patients (Fig. 7N).
Discussion
Ferroptosis, the novel form of non-apoptotic regulated cell death, is mainly caused by intracellular iron catalytic activity and lipid peroxidation, characterized by the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [20, 41]. Recent studies have shown that excessive activation of iron death-related pathways can effectively prevent tumor progression and enhance the effects of targeted therapy, chemotherapy and even immunotherapy [16, 20, 42]. Regulation of pathways by which cells resist oxidative stress is critical for mitigating ferroptosis [35]. In particular, the glutathione pathway has been identified as a key antioxidant defense pathway. Central to this process is the metabolic protein glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), which converts GSH to oxidized glutathione (GSSH), thereby protecting cells from iron by limiting cytotoxic lipid peroxidation deposition [43]. Antioxidant response elements (AREs) are found in the promoter regions of antioxidant genes in cells, and Nrf2 regulates gene expression by binding to the ARE sequences of cytoprotective genes [38]. The regulation of genes involved in oxidative stress, including GPX4, is largely controlled by the transcription factor Nrf2. It’s also a key defense against ferroptosis [44]. Normally, the expression of Nrf2 is inhibited by interacting with Keap1. Oxidative stress causes conformational changes in Keap1, disrupting this interaction, resulting in the stabilization of Nrf2 [38, 39]. Previous studies reported that p62/SQSTM1 can competitively inhibit the Keap1-Nrf2 complex, resulting in the upregulation of Nrf2 to resist ferroptosis [45].
LncRNAs are considered to be one of the key regulators of cancer progression and drug resistance by regulating the expression of downstream genes and various biological processes [19]. Accumulating evidence suggests that lncRNAs also play an important role in the occurrence of ferroptosis [46]. LncRNA p53RRA interacts with G3BP1 to promotes ferroptosis and apoptosis in lung cancer cells via nuclear sequestration of p53 [20]. Furthermore, lncRNA OIP5-AS1 inhibits ferroptosis by targeting the miR-128-3p/SLC7A11 pathway in prostate cancer [47]. A recent study found that the lncRNA NEAT1 promotes ferroptosis by regulating the miR-362-3p/MIOX axis in HCC cells [48]. LncRNAs play important roles in colorectal carcinogenesis, metastasis, and chemotherapy [49]. LINC00941 promotes CRC metastasis through preventing SMAD4 protein degradation and activating the TGF-β/SMAD2/3 signaling pathway [50]. In the present study, we found that lncRNAs also play an important role in ferroptosis in colorectal cancer.
In this study, we found that LINC00239 can promote the development of colorectal cancer by inhibiting ferroptosis. Previous studies have revealed that LINC00239, which is 652 nt in length, is upregulated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and CRC [51,52,53]. Yang et al.‘s study in acute myeloid leukemia found that LINC00239 could activate the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway to increase the resistance of acute myeloid leukemia cells to chemotherapeutic drugs [52]. Their research clarified that LINC00239 can play a certain role in the regulation of tumor cell fate, but the specific mechanism of action is still unclear. Liang et al. found that LINC00239 could interact with C-Myc promoter-binding protein-1 (MBP-1) to promote the expression of the oncogene C-Myc in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, thereby increasing the proliferation and metastatic capacity of ESCC cells [54]. Luo et al. showed that LINC00239 promotes colorectal cancer cell proliferation by sponging microRNA-484 and enhancing KLF12 expression [53]. These studies have well demonstrated that LINC00239 can regulate CRC progression by interacting with proteins. However, they still do not fully understand the mechanism of LINC00239 regulating ferroptosis in colorectal cancer cells.
In our study, we found that LINC00239 plays an important role in colorectal carcinogenesis. The recently discovered ferroptosis mode of programmed necrosis is a form of cell death that is independent of apoptosis. Ferroptosis is characterized by iron-dependent lethal accumulation of lipid ROS. Here, we demonstrate that LINC00239 decreases ROS, lipid ROS, and Fe2+ level, consistent with its role in ferroptosis. Moreover, the expression of several metabolic genes, including GPX4, which is linked to ferroptosis through its role in controlling lipid ROS, increased in the presence of LINC00239. Glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) is a key regulator of ferroptosis. The expression of GPX4 is largely controlled by the transcription factor NRF2. LINC00239 inhibits ferroptosis in colorectal cancer by binding to Keap1 to stabilize Nrf2. Importantly, our work further proposed that Nrf2 also acted as an upstream regulator of LINC00239, thus forming a positive feedback loop to promote CRC development. To further address the clinical significance of LINC00239 in CRC, we evaluated LINC00239 expression in CRC tissue arrays and fresh CRC samples and found that a higher LINC00239 level was an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis in CRC patients (Fig. 7 and Supplementary Fig. 5).
In summary, this study suggested that LINC00239 promotes CRC proliferation by interacting with Keap1, causing instability of the Keap1/Nrf2 complex, thus enhancing Nrf2 protein stability and facilitating its nuclear translocation. Moreover, Nrf2 also acted as an upstream regulator of LINC00239, thus forming a positive feedback loop to promote CRC development, providing new insight into the mechanism of ferroptosis in CRC and a novel potential therapeutic target for advanced CRC.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.
Keum N, Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:713–32.
Dekker E, Rex DK. Advances in CRC prevention: screening and surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:1970–84.
Wu Y, Zhang S, Gong X, Tam S, Xiao D, Liu S, et al. The epigenetic regulators and metabolic changes in ferroptosis-associated cancer progression. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:39.
Wu H, Fu M, Liu J, Chong W, Fang Z, Du F, et al. The role and application of small extracellular vesicles in gastric cancer. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:71.
Sajadimajd S, Khazaei M. Oxidative stress and cancer: the role of Nrf2. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2018;18:538–57.
Rojo de la Vega M, Chapman E, Zhang DD. NRF2 and the hallmarks of cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018;34:21–43.
Friedmann Angeli JP, Krysko DV, Conrad M. Ferroptosis at the crossroads of cancer-acquired drug resistance and immune evasion. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19:405–14.
Wu J, Minikes AM, Gao M, Bian H, Li Y, Stockwell BR, et al. Intercellular interaction dictates cancer cell ferroptosis via NF2-YAP signalling. Nature. 2019;572:402–6.
Zhang Y, Shi J, Liu X, Feng L, Gong Z, Koppula P, et al. BAP1 links metabolic regulation of ferroptosis to tumour suppression. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20:1181–92.
Jiang L, Kon N, Li T, Wang SJ, Su T, Hibshoosh H, et al. Ferroptosis as a p53-mediated activity during tumour suppression. Nature. 2015;520:57–62.
Yi J, Zhu J, Wu J, Thompson CB, Jiang X. Oncogenic activation of PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling suppresses ferroptosis via SREBP-mediated lipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:31189–97.
Atkinson SR, Marguerat S, Bähler J. Exploring long non-coding RNAs through sequencing. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2012;23:200–5.
Wu N, Jiang M, Liu H, Chu Y, Wang D, Cao J, et al. LINC00941 promotes CRC metastasis through preventing SMAD4 protein degradation and activating the TGF-β/SMAD2/3 signaling pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28:219–32.
Tang J, Yan T, Bao Y, Shen C, Yu C, Zhu X, et al. LncRNA GLCC1 promotes colorectal carcinogenesis and glucose metabolism by stabilizing c-Myc. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3499.
Liu S, Dang H, Lim D, Feng F, Maher C. Long noncoding RNAs in cancer metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21:446–60.
Siddiqui H, Al-Ghafari A, Choudhry H, Doghaither HA. Roles of long non-coding RNAs in colorectal cancer tumorigenesis: a review. Mol Clin Oncol. 2019;11:167–72.
Ulitsky I, Bartel D. lincRNAs: genomics, evolution, and mechanisms. Cell. 2013;154:26–46.
Mao C, Wang X, Liu Y, Wang M, Yan B, Jiang Y, et al. A G3BP1-Interacting lncRNA promotes ferroptosis and apoptosis in cancer via nuclear sequestration of p53. Cancer Res. 2018;78:3484–96.
Engreitz JM, Haines JE, Perez EM, Munson G, Chen J, Kane M, et al. Local regulation of gene expression by lncRNA promoters, transcription and splicing. Nature. 2016;539:452–5.
Engreitz JM, Ollikainen N, Guttman M. Long non-coding RNAs: spatial amplifiers that control nuclear structure and gene expression. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17:756–70.
Kretz M, Siprashvili Z, Chu C, Dan EW, Zehn De RA, Qu K, et al. Control of somatic tissue differentiation by the long non-coding RNA TINCR. Nature. 2013;493:231–5.
Liu J, Yao L, Zhang M, Jiang J, Yang M, Wang Y. Downregulation of LncRNA-XIST inhibited development of non-small cell lung cancer by activating miR-335/SOD2/ROS signal pathway mediated pyroptotic cell death. Aging. 2019;11:7830–46.
Wang Z, Chen X, Liu N, Shi Y, Liu Y, Ouyang L, et al. A nuclear long non-coding RNA LINC00618 accelerates ferroptosis in a manner dependent upon apoptosis. Mol Ther. 2021;29:263–74.
Moreno Leon L, Gautier M, Allan R, Ilié M, Nottet N, Pons N, et al. The nuclear hypoxia-regulated NLUCAT1 long non-coding RNA contributes to an aggressive phenotype in lung adenocarcinoma through regulation of oxidative stress. Oncogene. 2019;38:7146–65.
Han Y, Wu N, Jiang M, Chu Y, Wang Z, Liu H, et al. Long non-coding RNA MYOSLID functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate MCL-1 expression by sponging miR-29c-3p in gastric cancer. Cell Prolif. 2019;52:e12678.
Wessels H, Méndez-Mancilla A, Guo X, Legut M, Daniloski Z, Sanjana N. Massively parallel Cas13 screens reveal principles for guide RNA design. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:722–7.
Campeau E, Ruhl V, Rodier F, Smith C, Rahmberg B, Fuss J, et al. A versatile viral system for expression and depletion of proteins in mammalian cells. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6529.
Jiang M, Xu B, Li X, Shang Y, Chu Y, Wang W, et al. O-GlcNAcylation promotes colorectal cancer metastasis via the miR-101-O-GlcNAc/EZH2 regulatory feedback circuit. Oncogene. 2019;38:301–16.
Jiang M, Wu N, Xu B, Chu Y, Li X, Su S, et al. Fatty acid-induced CD36 expression via O-GlcNAcylation drives gastric cancer metastasis. Theranostics. 2019;9:5359–73.
Hao Q, Zong X, Sun Q, Lin Y, Song Y, Hashemikhabir S, et al. SUNO1The S-phase-induced lncRNA promotes cell proliferation by controlling YAP1/Hippo signaling pathway. eLife. 2020;9:e55102.
Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W98–W102.
Dixon S, Lemberg K, Lamprecht M, Skouta R, Zaitsev E, Gleason C, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149:1060–72.
iang L, Kon N, Li T, Wang SJ, Su T, Hibshoosh H, et al. Ferroptosis as a p53-mediated activity during tumour suppression. Nature. 2015;520:57–62.
Hayes JD, Dinkova-Kostova AT, Tew KD. Oxidative stress in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:167–97.
Cuadrado A, Rojo AI, Wells G, Hayes JD, Cousin SP, Rumsey WL, et al. Therapeutic targeting of the NRF2 and KEAP1 partnership in chronic diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:295–317.
Wang J, Lu Q, Cai J, Wang Y, Lai X, Qiu Y, et al. Nestin regulates cellular redox homeostasis in lung cancer through the Keap1–Nrf2 feedback loop. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–17.
Wen X, Thorne G, Hu L, Joy MS, Aleksunes LM. Activation of NRF2 signaling in HEK293 cells by a first-in-class direct KEAP1-NRF2 inhibitor. J Biochemical Mol Toxicol. 2015;29:261–6.
Zhang JF, Su L, Ye Q, Zhang SL, Kung HF, Jiang F, et al. Discovery of a novel Nrf2 inhibitor that induces apoptosis of human acute myeloid leukemia cells. Oncotarget. 2016;8:7625.
Jiang Y, Chao M, Yang R, Yan B, Shi Y, Liu X, et al. EGLN1/c-Myc induced lymphoid-specific helicase inhibits ferroptosis through lipid metabolic gene expression changes. Theranostics. 2017;7:3293–305.
Dixon SJ, Stockwell BR. The role of iron and reactive oxygen species in cell death. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:9.
Yang W, Sriramaratnam R, Welsch M, Shimada K, Skouta R, Viswanathan V, et al. Regulation of ferroptotic cancer. Cell Death GPX4 Cell. 2014;156:317–31.
Zhang Y, Swanda RV, Nie L, Liu X, Gan B. mTORC1 couples cyst(e)ine availability with GPX4 protein synthesis and ferroptosis regulation. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1589.
Sun X, Ou Z, Chen R, Niu X, Chen D, Kang R, et al. Activation of the p62-Keap1-NRF2 pathway protects against ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatology. 2016;63:173–84.
Chen J, Zhou J, Long Y. Ferroptosis related regulatory protein NCOA4 and its lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network in patients with anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury. J Hepatol. 2020;73:S222.
Yz A, Sg B, Sw C, Xl D, Dh A, Hl A, et al. LncRNA OIP5-AS1 inhibits ferroptosis in prostate cancer with long-term cadmium exposure through miR-128-3p/SLC7A11 signaling. Ecotoxicol Environmen Safety. 2021;220:112376.
Zhang Y, Luo M, Cui X, O’Connell D, Yang Y. Long noncoding RNA NEAT1 promotes ferroptosis by modulating the miR-362-3p/MIOX axis as a ceRNA. Cell Death Differ. 2022.
Han D, Wang M, Ma N, Xu Y, Jiang Y, Gao X. Long noncoding RNAs: novel players in colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015;361:13–21.
Wu N, Jiang M, Liu H, Chu Y, Wang D, Cao J, et al. LINC00941 promotes CRC metastasis through preventing SMAD4 protein degradation and activating the TGF-beta/SMAD2/3 signaling pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2020;28:219–32.
Ye J, Wu S, Pan S, Huang J, Ge L. Risk scoring based on expression of long non‑coding RNAs can effectively predict survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with or without fibrosis. Oncol Rep. 2020;43:1451–66.
Yang Y, Dai W, Sun Y, Zhao Z. Long non‑coding RNA linc00239 promotes malignant behaviors and chemoresistance against doxorubicin partially via activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in acute myeloid leukaemia cells. Oncol Rep. 2019;41:2311–20.
Luo X, Yue M, Li C, Sun D, Wang L. Long non-coding RNA LINC00239 functions as a competitive endogenous RNA by sponging microRNA-484 and enhancing KLF12 expression to promote the oncogenicity of colorectal cancer. OncoTargets Ther. 2020;13:12067–81.
Liang X, Lu J, Wu Z, Guo Y, Shen S, Liang J, et al. LINC00239 interacts with C-Myc promoter-binding protein-1 (MBP-1) to promote expression of C-Myc in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Mol cancer Res: MCR. 2021;19:1465–75.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Jing Zhang (Northwest University), Dr. QiangQiang Yuan (Northwest University), Dr. Miaomiao Tian (Air Force Military Medical University), Dr. Zuhong Tian (Air Force Military Medical University), Prof. Kaichun Wu (Air Force Military Medical University), for their support with experiments.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 8210115027, 81772650, 81421003, 81572302, 82000541, and 82000548) and Independent Funds of the Key Laboratory (CBSKL2015Z12); Airforce Aoxiang Foundation and Young Changjiang Scholars of the Ministry of Education (JL); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (2020M683700XB). The funders had no role in the study design, the data collection and analysis, the interpretation of the data, the writing of the report, and the decision to submit this article for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YYH, XLG, and YRJ performed the experiments. NW and XLG performed the bioinformatics analysis. XLG and YC conducted the assays. JYC and SZY performed animal experiments. HL and HZ performed the IHC experiments and provided pathological assistance. MZJ and XX assisted in manuscript proofreading. FLC, and YH supervised the study and edited the manuscript; BX, WQ, and JL designed and supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Professor Anastasis Stephanou
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Han, Y., Gao, X., Wu, N. et al. Long noncoding RNA LINC00239 inhibits ferroptosis in colorectal cancer by binding to Keap1 to stabilize Nrf2. Cell Death Dis 13, 742 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05192-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05192-y
This article is cited by
-
The roles and molecular mechanisms of non-coding RNA in cancer metabolic reprogramming
Cancer Cell International (2024)
-
Advancing the frontiers of colorectal cancer treatment: harnessing ferroptosis regulation
Apoptosis (2024)
-
Integration of single-cell transcriptomics and epigenetic analysis reveals enhancer-controlled TIMP1 as a regulator of ferroptosis in colorectal cancer
Genes & Genomics (2024)
-
Curdione induces ferroptosis mediated by m6A methylation via METTL14 and YTHDF2 in colorectal cancer
Chinese Medicine (2023)
-
Targeting NRF2 uncovered an intrinsic susceptibility of acute myeloid leukemia cells to ferroptosis
Experimental Hematology & Oncology (2023)