Cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a population of cells within the tumor able to drive tumorigenesis and known to be highly resistant to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In this work, we show a new role for ETV7, a transcriptional repressor member of the ETS family, in promoting breast cancer stem-like cells plasticity and resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy in breast cancer (BC) cells. We observed that MCF7 and T47D BC-derived cells stably over-expressing ETV7 showed reduced sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorouracil and to radiotherapy, accompanied by an adaptive proliferative behavior observed in different culture conditions. We further noticed that alteration of ETV7 expression could significantly affect the population of breast CSCs, measured by CD44+/CD24low cell population and mammosphere formation efficiency. By transcriptome profiling, we identified a signature of Interferon-responsive genes significantly repressed in cells over-expressing ETV7, which could be responsible for the increase in the breast CSCs population, as this could be partially reverted by the treatment with IFN-β. Lastly, we show that the expression of the IFN-responsive genes repressed by ETV7 could have prognostic value in breast cancer, as low expression of these genes was associated with a worse prognosis. Therefore, we propose a novel role for ETV7 in breast cancer stem cells’ plasticity and associated resistance to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which involves the repression of a group of IFN-responsive genes, potentially reversible upon IFN-β treatment. We, therefore, suggest that an in-depth investigation of this mechanism could lead to novel breast CSCs targeted therapies and to the improvement of combinatorial regimens, possibly involving the therapeutic use of IFN-β, with the aim of avoiding resistance development and relapse in breast cancer.
Breast cancer is the most frequent tumor and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women . Breast cancer is a highly genetically heterogeneous disease , and current therapeutic approaches are chosen based on the subtype of cancer, stage, mass and localization of the tumors among several parameters . The most common therapeutic strategies rely both on local (e.g., surgery and radiotherapy) and systemic treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, endocrine/hormonal, and targeted therapy) . Hormone-dependent breast cancers, such as luminal breast cancers, frequently become refractory to the initially effective hormonal treatments, thus eventually requiring chemotherapy . Chemotherapy, in fact, still represents the most common option for advanced breast cancers. However, it has been demonstrated that chemotherapy itself, despite triggering shrinkage of primary tumors, can enhance metastasis through induction of EMT . Moreover, cancer cells can develop drug resistance, resulting in treatment failure and recurrence [7, 8]. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are considered the population of cells within the tumor able to drive tumorigenesis. CSCs are characterized by self-renewal ability and differentiation potential, and can therefore contribute to the heterogeneity of cancer cells within the tumor [9, 10]. Moreover, they are known to be intrinsically highly resistant to conventional anti-cancer agents, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy [11, 12]. Therefore, uncovering the pathways and mechanisms involved in CSCs enrichment, development of drug resistance or other unwanted side effects associated with chemotherapy is an urgent and critical aim for cancer research, oriented to improve treatment efficacy.
Using genome-wide transcriptional profiling of MCF7 human breast adenocarcinoma-derived cells, we identified ETV7 as a potential tumor-promoting factor among the genes more synergistically upregulated by the combinatorial treatment with the chemotherapeutic agent Doxorubicin and the inflammatory cytokine TNFα .
ETV7, also called TEL2 or TELB, is a member of the large family of ETS (E26 transforming specific) transcription factors, whose members can regulate the expression of genes involved in various processes, such as development, differentiation, cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis [14, 15]. Given their role in essential cellular functions, their dysregulation can result in severe impairments within the cell, as demonstrated by the involvement of ETS factors in various diseases [16,17,18]. In particular, many ETS factors have been associated with cancer initiation, transformation, and metastatic spread [19,20,21,22]. The roles of ETV7 are still poorly understood and studied, partially because of the absence of the ETV7 gene in most rodent species, including mice . However, several studies highlighted multiple roles for ETV7 in hematopoiesis. For example, the over-expression of ETV7 in both human and mice hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) could increase the proliferation and deplete HSCs . Moreover, ETV7 over-expression in human U937 cells was shown to impede monocytic differentiation . ETV7 is also recognized as an Interferon (IFN)-stimulated gene (ISG), as its expression was shown to be induced by type I, type II, and type III IFN treatment in different cell types [26,27,28]. Elevated ETV7 expression has been associated with several tumor types; however, the role of ETV7 in cancer has been poorly investigated. ETV7 was shown to cooperate with Eμ-MYC in promoting B-lymphomagenesis  and the forced expression of ETV7 in mouse bone marrow was shown to cause myeloproliferative diseases, even if with a long latency, suggesting TEL2 as a bona fide oncogene . Besides, the crossing of the latest established ETV7 transgenic mouse model with an established leukemic mouse model revealed a remarkable acceleration in Pten−/− leukemogenesis . Further evidence supporting ETV7 pro-tumorigenic functions comes from the recent identification of a transcriptional-independent activity of ETV7, which was shown to physically interact with mTOR into the cytoplasm generating a novel complex called mTORC3, which contributes to resistance to rapamycin, an mTOR-targeting anti-cancer agent . In contrast with these observations, ETV7 was shown to act as tumor suppressor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by repressing SERPINE1 , and its downregulation was observed in drug-resistant cancer cells .
Recently, Piggin and colleagues reported an average higher level of ETV7 expression in tissues from all the breast cancer subtypes compared to normal breast tissues, with a correlation of ETV7 expression and breast cancer aggressiveness . We have recently demonstrated in breast cancer-derived cells that ETV7 expression can be induced by DNA-damaging chemotherapy, and elevated ETV7 levels has been associated with reduced sensitivity to Doxorubicin treatment, a mechanism that involve ETV7-mediated direct repression of DNAJC15, resulting in the increase in ABCB1 expression levels .
In this study, we further demonstrated the role of ETV7 in breast cancer cell resistance to another chemotherapeutic drug, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiotherapy. Noteworthy, we were able to observe a remarkable increase in breast cancer stem cells content in the cells over-expressing ETV7. We finally identified via RNA-seq a set of type I and type II Interferon response genes that were repressed by ETV7 as putatively responsible for the stem cells enrichment.
In the light of these results, we propose a novel role for ETV7 as a regulator of breast cancer stem cell-like plasticity, which is mediated by the repression of IFN-stimulated genes and that can be partially reverted by the stimulation of IFN response with IFN-β.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and culture conditions
MCF7 cells were obtained from Interlab Cell Line Collection bank (IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy), T47D and BT-549 cells were received from Dr. U. Pfeffer (IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino); HEK293T cells were a gift from Prof. J. Borlak (Hanover Medical School, Germany), HCC70 from Dr. M.R. Maiello (INT-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy), MDA-MB-231 and SK-BR-3 cells were a gift from Prof. A. Provenzani (CIBIO Department, University of Trento, Italy), while ZR-75-1 cell line was obtained from Prof. A. Zippo (CIBIO Department).
MCF7, T47D, SK-BR-3, and HEK293T cells were grown in DMEM medium (Gibco, ThermoFisher Scientific, Monza, Italy) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco), 2mM L-Glutamine (Gibco) and a mixture of 100 U/ml Penicillin/100 μg/ml Streptomycin (Gibco). MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured in the same medium with the addition of 1% non-essential amino acids (Gibco). HCC70, BT-549, and ZR-75-1 were grown in RPMI medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-Glutamine, and a mixture of 100 U/ml Penicillin/100 μg/ml Streptomycin; BT-549 cells were also supplemented with 1% Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium supplement (Gibco) while ZR-75-1 cells with 1% sodium pyruvate (Gibco). Cells were grown at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. Cell lines were monthly checked for mycoplasma contaminations and have recently been authenticated by PCR-single-locus-technology (Eurofins Genomics, Ebersberg, Germany or DDC Medical, Fairfield, OH, USA).
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) (Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy) was used at different concentrations and for different time points based on the specific experiment. Recombinant human IFN-β and IFN-γ (Peprotech, Tebu-Bio, Milan, Italy) were used at different concentrations and for different time points based on the experiment. Navitoclax and Elacridar were obtained from MedChemExpress (D.B.A., Milan, Italy) and Selleckchem (Aurogene, Rome, Italy), respectively. Radiation treatment was performed using the Elekta Precise Linear Accelerator (Elekta Oncology Systems, Crawley, UK) for different doses and time points.
The expression vector pCMV6-Entry-ETV7 C-terminally tagged with DDK-Myc tags was purchased from Origene (Tema Ricerca, Bologna, Italy). The lentiviral vector pAIP-ETV7 was obtained by cloning using the following primers to amplify the ETV7 gene from pCMV6-Entry-ETV7 and inserting it into the pAIP-Empty plasmid (the tails containing restriction endonucleases’ target sequences are indicated in lowercase):
pAIP was a gift from Jeremy Luban (Addgene plasmid #74171; http://n2t.net/addgene:74171; Watertown, MA, USA). Purified PCR product was inserted into the pAIP backbone using HpaI and EcoRI restriction endonucleases (New England Biolabs, Euroclone, Milan, Italy). Correct cloning was checked by restriction analysis and direct sequencing (Eurofins Genomics).
pCMV-D8.91 and pCMV-VSVg plasmids for lentiviral particles production were obtained from Prof. Anna Cereseto, Laboratory of Molecular Virology, CIBIO Department, University of Trento, Italy.
Viral vectors production in HEK293T
To obtain viral particles, HEK293T packaging cells were seeded into P150 dishes and transiently transfected with a mix containing 17.5 μg pCMV-D8.91 plasmid, 7.5 μg pCMV-VSVg plasmid, 25 μg lentiviral vector containing the gene of interest and 112.5 μl PEI 2X transfection solution (Sigma-Aldrich). After 48 h, viral vectors containing the plasmid of interest were collected in the supernatant and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. Vectors’ yield was quantified by the SG-PERT (Product-Enhanced Reverse Transcriptase) assay with the help of Prof. Anna Cereseto’s group, Laboratory of Molecular Virology, CIBIO Department, University of Trento, Italy.
Generation of stable pAIP-ETV7 and Empty MCF7 and T47D cells
To obtain cell lines having a stable over-expression of the ETV7 gene, MCF7 and T47D cells were transduced with 1 RTU of the lentiviral vector pAIP-Empty and with the lentiviral vector for the expression of the heterologous gene ETV7, pAIP-ETV7. After 72 h, cells were split, and Puromycin (Life Technologies) was added at a concentration of 1.5 and 2.5 μg/ml, respectively for MCF7 and T47D cells. Each 3 days medium was replaced, and after 4 cycles of selection, single cell cloning was performed for MCF7 cells according to the Corning protocol for cell cloning by Serial dilution in 96-well plates. During the single cell cloning procedure Puromycin concentration was gradually reduced to 0.75 μg/ml. T47D cells did not undergo serial dilution but were kept as the pooled population under Puromycin selection (1.5 μg/ml).
Target RNAs were silenced using small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and the transfection reagent INTERFERin® (Polyplus-Transfection, Euroclone). Scrambled siRNA was used as a control. Scrambled siRNA and ETV7 targeting siRNA (#1 and #2) were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Tema Ricerca). 24 h before transfection cells were seeded in 6-well or 96-well plates to reach 50–60% confluence. Then the cells were transfected with 20 nM siRNA and 7 μl or 0.75 μl of INTERFERin reagent per well, according to the used plate format. The transfection mix was diluted respectively in 200 μl or 50 μl of OptiMEM medium (Gibco, Life Technologies), vortexed for 10 s, incubated at room temperature for 15 min, and added to the cells. Analyses on the silenced cells were performed 72 h post-transfection.
RNA isolation and RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted using the Illustra RNA spin Mini Kit (GE Healthcare, Milan, Italy), converted into cDNA with the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit following manufacturer’s recommendations (ThermoFisher Scientific) and RT-qPCR was performed with 25 ng of template cDNA into 384-well plates (BioRad, Milan, Italy) using the Kapa Sybr Fast qPCR Master Mix (Kapa Biosystems, Resnova, Ancona, Italy) or the qPCRBIO SyGreen 2X (PCR Biosystems, Resnova) and the CFX384 Detection System (BioRad). YWHAZ and GAPDH were used as housekeeping genes to obtain the relative fold change with the ΔΔCt method as previously described . Primer sequences were designed using Primer-BLAST designing tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primerblast/), checked for specificity and efficiency, and are listed in Supplementary Table 1 (Eurofins Genomics).
Western blotting was performed as previously reported [38, 39]. Briefly, total protein extracts were obtained by lysing the cells in RIPA buffer (150 mM Sodium Chloride, 1% NP-40, 0.5% Sodium Deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and 50 mM TrisHCl pH 8.0) and proteins were quantified with the BCA method (Pierce, ThermoFisher Scientific); 20–50 μg of protein extracts were loaded on appropriate 7.5%, 10% or 12% polyacrylamide gels and SDS-PAGE was performed. Proteins were then transferred on Nitrocellulose membranes, which were probed over-night at 4 °C with specific antibodies diluted in 1% non-fat skim milk-PBS-T solution: ETV7/TEL2 (E-1, sc-374478), β-Tubulin (3F3-G2, sc-53140), STAT1 (D1K9Y, Cell Signaling Technology, Euroclone), p-STAT1 (Tyr701) (D4A7, Cell Signaling Technology), BCL-2 (100, sc-509), Survivin (D-8, sc-17779), EpCAM (ab71916, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and HSP70 (C92F3A-5, sc-66048). Antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (Heidelberg, Germany) when not explicitly indicated. Detection was performed with ECL Select reagent (GE Healthcare) using the UVITec Alliance LD2 (UVITec Cambridge, UK) imaging system.
Cell Titer Glo viability assay
Viability assay was performed using the Cell Titer-Glo Luminescent cell viability assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were seeded in white flat 96-well plates and treated with different concentrations of 5-FU for 72 ho. Afterward, the plates were equilibrated at room temperature for 30 min; then, 100 μl of Cell Titer-Glo reagent was added to 100 μl of medium and left in incubation for 2 min on an orbital shaker. Then, a luminescence measure was performed at the Infinite M200 plate reader (Tecan, Milan, Italy) or Varioskan™ LUX multimode microplate reader (ThermoFisher Scientific). Viability was calculated as a % ratio of viable cells treated with the indicated drug respect to DMSO control.
Vi-CELL viability assay and doubling time calculation
The cell viability after radiotherapy treatment was measured using the Vi-CELL viability analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), which performs trypan blue dye exclusion method with an automated system. Cells were seeded in 6-well plates for 24 h and then treated with different radiation doses (2 to 10 Gy) and incubated for 72 h. Afterward, cells were harvested using trypsin and re-suspended in PBS. Vi-CELL performed the automated count of viable cells in the sample, allowing for viability measurement. The viability was calculated as the percentage of viable cells with respect to the untreated control. Doubling time was calculated with the following formula:
Doubling time (hours) = time in culture (hours) × ln(2)/ln(# cells harvested/# cells seeded).
Annexin V-FITC/PI staining
Apoptosis was measured using the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) as previously described . Briefly, cells were stained with an antibody against Annexin V conjugated to FITC fluorochrome together with the vital dye propidium iodide (PI). After the appropriate treatment, cells were harvested, washed twice with cold PBS and re-suspended in 1× Annexin V Binding Buffer at the concentration of 1.5 × 106 cells/ml. 100 μl of the cell suspension was then incubated with 2.5 μl of FITC Annexin V and 5 μl of PI for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Subsequently, 400 μl of 1× Annexin V Binding Buffer was added to each tube and samples were then analyzed. Flow cytometry analysis was conducted at the CIBIO Cell Analysis and Separation Core Facility using a FACS Canto A instrument (BD Biosciences).
The membrane expression of CD44 and CD24 cell surface markers was measured by double staining with antibodies conjugated with fluorophores and flow cytometry analysis. Cells were seeded in 6-well plate or T25 flasks and, after the appropriate treatments, were harvested and washed with PBS. 3 × 105 cells were re-suspended in 30 μl PBS + 0.1% BSA and incubated with APC mouse anti-human CD44 (cat.no 559942, BD Bioscience) and FITC mouse anti-human CD24 (cat.no 555427, BD Bioscience) antibodies or with their isotype controls (FITC mouse IgG2a, k isotype, and APC mouse IgG2b, k isotype, BD Bioscience) in ice for 30 min. After incubation cells were washed three times with PBS and finally re-suspended in 300 μl PBS. Flow cytometry analysis was performed as mentioned above.
ALDEFLUOR kit (STEMCELL Technologies, Cologne, Germany) was used to identify cells expressing high levels of ALDH enzyme. Experiments were performed following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells were harvested and re-suspended in ALDEFLUOR Assay Buffer at the concentration of 3 × 105 cells/ml. Then, 5 μl of activated ALDEFLUOR reagent was added to the cells and mixed. 500 μl of the cell suspension and reagent mixture was immediately moved to the control tube containing 5 μl of DEAB (diethylaminobenzaldehyde) reagent, a specific inhibitor of ALDH activity. Samples and controls were incubated for 45 min at 37 °C. After the incubation, cells were centrifuged and re-suspended in ALDEFLUOR Assay Buffer. Flow cytometry analysis was performed at the Tyrolean Cancer Research Institute using a FACS Canto II instrument (BD Biosciences).
Colony formation assays
The clonogenic assay was performed seeding single cell suspension with 2 × 103 MCF7 or 4 × 103 T47D cells in 6-well plates in complete growth medium. Cells were let grow for 3 weeks changing the medium twice a week. After 3 weeks, the cell colonies were gently washed with PBS and stained by the incubation with 0.1% Crystal Violet solution in 20% methanol for 20 min. Excess staining was removed, and colonies were washed twice in PBS. Image analysis was performed with the Image J software in order to calculate the percentage of well’s area occupied by colonies. To characterize the capability of transformed cells to grow independently from a solid surface (anchorage-independent growth), we performed soft agar colony formation assay. The wells of 6-well plates were prepared with a layer of base agar (0.7% agarose in DMEM complete medium + 10% FBS). After the solidification of the base, single cell suspension containing 1.5 × 104 (MCF7) or 2 × 104 (T47D) cells/well was rapidly mixed to the soft agar solution (0.35% agarose in DMEM complete medium) and disposed of as a layer over the previously prepared base agar. Finally, 1 ml of growing medium was added on the top. Cells were let grow for 3 weeks changing the top medium twice a week. Afterward, cells were stained with 0.1% Crystal Violet solution in 20% methanol and washed several times with PBS 1× to remove the excess of Crystal Violet solution. Image analysis was performed with the Image J software in order to calculate the average size of the colonies.
Mammosphere formation assay was performed by adaptation of a previously published protocol . Briefly, to generate primary mammospheres, cells were harvested with trypsin, centrifuged and re-suspended in mammosphere medium (DMEM/F12 supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin with the addition of 20 ng/ml recombinant human epidermal growth factor (EGF), 10 ng/ml recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and 1× B27 supplement (Life Technologies). Cells were then counted and passed through a 25G needle to obtain a single cell suspension. Then, 103 cells/well were seeded in ultra-low attachment 24-well plates (Corning, Rome, Italy) in 800 μl of mammosphere medium. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for one week, and images were obtained at DM IL LED Inverted Microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Mammospheres were counted and split by harvesting the mammospheres with PBS, centrifuging and re-suspending with TrypLE Express Reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific) as an alternative to trypsin. The single cell suspension was then again counted, and seeded at the same starting concentration in the mammosphere medium. After 1 week, mammospheres were counted and it was possible to calculate the Mammosphere Forming Efficiency (%) using the following equation:
MFE (%) = (# of mammospheres per well)/(# of cells seeded per well) × 100.
Generation of ETV7 KO cells
To knock-out ETV7 with CRIPSR-Cas9 technology, ETV7-specific gRNA sequences targeting exon 6 were designed using the CRISPOR.org web tool  and cloned using sgRNA-ETV7-Ex6-1: caccgAGGGCTCATATCGGGTATCA and sgRNA-ETV7-Ex6-2: aaacTGATACCCGATATGAGCCCTc oligos into the pX330-SpCas9-sgRNA-Puro vector (obtained from Prof. Anna Cereseto, CIBIO Department, University of Trento, Italy) digested with BbsI restriction enzyme (ThermoFisher Scientific). The correct insertion of each gRNA into the plasmid was checked by direct sequencing (Eurofins Genomics).
To obtain SK-BR-3 cells knock-out for ETV7, 50,000 cells per well were seeded in 24-well plate and after 24 h transfected with 500 ng pX330-Puro-ETV7 gRNA plasmids using Lipofectamine LTX and Plus Reagent (Life Technologies, ThermoFisher Scientific). After 48 h post-transfection, cells were selected with 1 µg/ml of Puromycin (Life Technologies). After 3 days of selection, Puromycin was removed from the culture medium and once reached confluency, cells were split and harvested for indel analysis. Single cell cloning was performed according to the Corning protocol for cell cloning by Serial dilution in 96-well plates. Obtained single clones were screened by performing TIDE (Tracking of Indels by DEcomposition) analysis. Genomic DNA was extracted using QuickExtract™ DNA Extraction Solution (Lucigen, Middleton, WI, USA). PCR on the edited region was performed using 5× FIREPol® Master Mix (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia) and specific primers (TIDE-ETV7-ex6-F: ATCAGATGCTCCTGTTGGGC, TIDE-ETV7-ex6-R: GAGCCCCATTAGTGGCTGTT), and purified products analyzed with Sanger sequencing (Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland). TIDE analysis and efficiency of the editing was performed through the TIDE online platform (http://shinyapps.datacurators.nl/tide/) using parental cells as reference control .
Gene expression profiling
Total RNA from three independent biological replicates for MCF7 and T47D cells stably transduced with pAIP-Empty and pAIP-ETV7 was checked for quality and purity using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) selecting RNA extracts with a RIN (RNA integrity number) value >8. RNA (1 μg) was then converted into cDNA libraries according to the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Preparation Guide (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Pair-end reads (2 × 75 bp) were generated from the libraries using the Illumina HiSeq2500 sequencer at CIBIO NGS Core Facility according to the standard Illumina protocol.
Raw reads were adapter-trimmed with BBDuk (sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/) and aligned to build version hg38 of the human genome using STAR (version 2.5.3a ). Counts for UCSC annotated genes were calculated from the aligned reads using the featureCounts function of the Rsubread R package  and R (version 3.3.1). Normalization and differential expression analysis were carried out using edgeR R package . Raw counts were normalized to obtain Counts Per Million mapped reads (CPM). Only genes with a CPM greater than 1 in at least 3 samples were retained for downstream analysis. Gene expression changes were considered statistically significant with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR ≤ 5%. Enrichment analysis for Gene Ontology—biological process category was performed on the list of 427 downregulated genes upon ETV7 over-expression in both cell lines using enrichGO function of the clusterProfiler R package . Gene set enrichment analysis  was performed in preranked mode on the log2 fold change values estimated by edgeR and the Hallmark collection of Molecular Signature Database (MSigDB version 6.1, ). Gene sets were considered significantly enriched at FDR ≤ 5% when using 1000 permutations of the gene sets. We defined a signature of 22 ETV7-regulated IFN-responsive genes taking genes significantly downregulated in both cell lines upon ETV7 over-expression and included in the HALLMARK_INTERFERON_ALPHA_RESPONSE and HALLMARK_INTERFERON_GAMMA_RESPONSE gene sets of MSigDB. Heatmaps were created using standardized CPM expression values and pheatmap R package (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap). RNA-seq data from this study have been deposited at Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) with accession number GSE152580.
FPKM normalized expression data for TCGA breast cancer samples were downloaded from NCI Genomic Data Commons (TCGA-BRCA project) using the TCGAbiolinks R package . ETV7 expression in different sample types (i.e., primary tumor, metastasis, and normal tissue) and PAM50 molecular subtypes was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey test. Scores for the ETV7-regulated IFN-responsive gene signature in primary tumor samples have been calculated as the average expression of the genes comprised in the signature. Samples have been classified as signature “high” if the ETV7-regulated IFN-responsive gene signature score was higher than the median of the signature scores in the tumor samples, and “low” vice versa. To evaluate the prognostic value of the ETV7-regulated IFN-responsive gene signature, we estimated, using the Kaplan–Meier method, the probabilities that patients would survive (overall survival, OS; disease-specific survival, DSS), would remain free of disease (disease-free interval, DFI) or progression (progression-free interval, PFI). Survival data were censored at 12 years. Kaplan–Meier curves were compared using the logrank test in the survcomp R package.
Where not specified, statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism version 6.0 software. When appropriate, unpaired t-test was applied for statistical significance. We selected throughout this study the two-sample Student’s t-test for unequal variance, given that we generally compared two conditions (i.e., treated vs. untreated samples, or over-expression of ETV7 vs. Empty control).
Increased ETV7 expression decreases the sensitivity of cancer cells to 5-FluoroUracil and to radiotherapy
We analyzed the endogenous expression levels of ETV7 among a panel of breast cancer cell lines and we observed a higher expression of ETV7 protein in triple negative and HER2+-derived cell lines, compared to the luminal ones, suggesting a correlation between the expression of ETV7 and the aggressiveness of the tumor (Supplementary Fig. 1A). We previously showed that ETV7 over-expression in breast cancer cell lines could reduce the sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic drug Doxorubicin . To test whether ETV7 altered expression could also affect the sensitivity to other therapeutic treatments for breast cancer, we established two luminal breast cancer-derived cell lines (i.e., MCF7 and T47D, that express very low levels of endogenous ETV7) stably over-expressing ETV7 by lentiviral transduction of a plasmid carrying the ETV7 cDNA or the empty counterpart. The overexpression of ETV7 in MCF7 and T47D was verified by western blot analysis (Fig. 1A, B). We first evaluated the sensitivity of the cells to 5-FluoroUracil (5-FU), a commonly used breast cancer chemotherapeutic drug which, similarly to Doxorubicin, is also able to induce ETV7 expression in breast cancer cells . We analyzed the viability of the cells after treatment with 5-FU using Cell Titer Glo Assay, and we could observe that the cells over-expressing ETV7 showed a remarkably reduced sensitivity to the treatment compared to their empty counterpart, in both MCF7 (Fig. 1C) and T47D cells (Fig. 1D). Furthermore, the opposite effect was evident upon ETV7 knock-down using siRNAs, which resulted in a sensitization to 5-FU treatment in T47D cells (Supplementary Fig. 1B, C). To confirm the increased resistance to 5-FU of the cells over-expressing ETV7, we analyzed the induction of cell death, and in particular of apoptosis, in cells treated with 5-FU. By Annexin V-FITC/PI staining and flow cytometry analysis, we observed a significant reduction in PI positive (dead) cells (Fig. 1E) and a significant, but less pronounced, reduction in the percentage of Annexin V positive (apoptotic) cells (Supplementary Fig. 1D). A similar trend was also visible in T47D cells, however, the reduction in apoptosis was not significant in this cell line (Supplementary Fig. 1E, F). We previously demonstrated that the ETV7-induced resistance to Doxorubicin involved drug efflux mediated by the ABC transporter ABCB1, which was upregulated at the transcriptional level both in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells over-expressing ETV7 . We decided to extend our analysis to other ABC transporters, which are commonly deregulated in drug-resistant breast cancers, such as ABCC1/MRP1 and ABCG2/BCRP [51,52,53]. We observed ABCB1, ABCC1, and ABCG2 upregulation in MCF7 cells over-expressing ETV7 (Fig. 1F); however, no significant differences in their expression could be shown in T47D cells (Supplementary Fig. 1G). To further confirm the significance of elevated levels of ABC transporters in the ETV7-mediated resistance to 5-FU in MCF7 cells, we used Elacridar, a dual inhibitor able to block ABCB1 and ABCG2. Viability assays showed an increased sensitivity of MCF7 cells over-expressing ETV7 to 5-FU when combined with Elacridar (Supplementary Fig. 1H). Noteworthy, we were also able to detect a remarkable increase in the expression of the anti-apoptotic proteins BCL-2 and Survivin in MCF7 cells over-expressing ETV7 (Fig. 1G), which could explain the decreased percentage of apoptotic cells upon 5-FU treatment visible in MCF7 cells. Based on these results, also the combined treatment with 5-FU and Navitoclax, a potent BCL-2 inhibitor, led to a slight sensitization of MCF7 cells over-expressing ETV7 (Supplementary Fig. 1I). The same effect could not be observed in T47D cells (data not shown) where neither BCL-2 nor Survivin (already high at the baseline) were influenced by the over-expression of ETV7 (Supplementary Fig. 1J).
In order to test whether the over-expression of ETV7 could confer resistance to other breast cancer treatments that act through a different mechanism of action, we examined the sensitivity to radiotherapy. We exposed the cells to different doses of radiation (from 2 to 10 Gy) and measured the percentage of viable cells and the induction of apoptosis. Interestingly, cells over-expressing ETV7 showed a decreased sensitivity also to radiotherapy exposure in both MCF7 and T47D cells (Supplementary Fig. 2A, B). However, significant differences between ETV7 over-expressing cells and the empty control in the induction of apoptosis could be detected only for the lower dose of radiation (2 Gy) in both the cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 2C–E), suggesting that the resistance mechanism induced by ETV7 relies only partially on the inhibition of apoptosis.
The over-expression of ETV7 alters the proliferative potential of luminal breast cancer cells
Since the protective effect determined by ETV7 seems to be only partially dependent on the inhibition of apoptosis, we analyzed the proliferative potential of the cells; in fact, as both 5-FU and radiotherapy exert their action when the cells divide, their activity is strongly dependent on the proliferative rate of the cells. We first analyzed the proliferative potential of MCF7 and T47D cells stably over-expressing ETV7 by measuring their doubling time using the ViCell instrument. We observed a significant increase in the doubling time of MCF7 cells over-expressing ETV7 in comparison to MCF7 Empty cells, demonstrating that cell proliferation was slower in cells over-expressing ETV7 compared to the empty control (Supplementary Fig. 2E). In T47D cells, this increase in the doubling time was instead slight and not significant (Supplementary Fig. 2F). Using clonogenic assay, we could appreciate a substantial decrease in the colony formation potential of cells over-expressing ETV7 when grown on plastic in both MCF7 and T47D cells (Fig. 2A, B). Therefore, the decreased proliferative rate of the cells could also explain the increased resistance to 5-FU and radiotherapy. Notably, despite the similar proliferation rate when cultured in normal conditions, the growth of T47D Empty cells was significantly reduced compared with MCF7 Empty cells when grown at single cell density. Surprisingly, the analysis of the colony formation ability of the cells in an anchorage-independent system with the soft agar assay showed an opposite proliferative behavior. Indeed, both MCF7 and T47D cells over-expressing ETV7 formed larger colonies when grown in soft agar compared to control (Fig. 2C, D). Nevertheless, the anchorage-independent growth is commonly considered a pro-tumorigenic feature; thus, these apparently contradictory results might suggest that the cells over-expressing ETV7 could gain the ability to switch to different proliferative behaviors based on the environmental conditions.
The expression of ETV7 affects BCSCs markers expression and mammosphere formation
Given the observed increased resistance to 5-FU and radiotherapy, the adaptive proliferative potential of the cells to different environmental conditions, and data from the literature reporting the involvement of ETV7 in cell differentiation [25, 54], we hypothesized that ETV7 might play a role in breast cancer stem-like cells plasticity. To test this hypothesis, we first analyzed some of the most commonly accepted markers for breast cancer stem cells, including CD44 and CD24 expression and ALDH activity. We measured the percentage of CD44+ and CD24− cells (representing the BCSCs population) in MCF7 and T47D cells over-expressing ETV7 or their relative control. Both the parental cell lines presented a very low or almost absent population of CD44+/CD24− cells; however, we could appreciate an impressive increase in this population in both the cell lines tested upon ETV7 over-expression (Fig. 3A, B). Importantly, the over-expression of ETV7 could stimulate both the increase in CD44 expression and the decrease in CD24 expression on the plasma membrane of the cells. Among the two markers, only CD24 expression was regulated by ETV7 at the transcript level (Supplementary Fig. 3A, B) in both the cell lines, whereas either no significant changes or transcript downregulation could be observed for CD44 in T47D and MCF7 cells over-expressing ETV7 respectively, suggesting a post-transcriptional mechanism of upregulation of CD44 expression or translocation upon ETV7 over-expression (Supplementary Fig. 3A, B). We then evaluated the activity of ALDH via ALDEFLUOR assay kit. Here again, we observed a very low population of ALDH+ cells in the parental cell lines, but, either a decrease in this already small population or no significant differences were observed in response to ETV7 over-expression in MCF7 (Supplementary Fig. 3C) and T47D (Supplementary Fig. 3D) cells, respectively. Thus, the over-expression of ETV7 seems to drive a strong polarization of the analyzed breast cancer cells toward a more cancer stem-like cell phenotype represented by the CD44+/CD24− population.
Furthermore, to confirm our findings, we analyzed the expression of a recognized additional marker for breast cancer stemness, the adhesion molecule EpCAM. Noteworthy, we could appreciate a strong increase in EpCAM protein expression in ETV7 over-expressing cells (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. 3E).
To verify whether modulating the expression of ETV7 in the opposite direction could also affect the population of CD44+/CD24− cells, we silenced the expression of ETV7 in the aggressive triple negative BC-derived cell line MDA-MB-231, which is known from the literature to present almost exclusively CD44+/CD24− cells . We knocked-down ETV7 expression using two different siRNAs (siETV7#1 and siETV7#2), and we confirmed their activity at mRNA and protein level (Supplementary Fig. 3F, G). Noteworthy, although MDA-MB-231 cells do not express high level of ETV7, which does not account for their CD44/CD24 expression levels, in both samples silenced for ETV7 we observed a population of cells with decreased CD44 membrane expression compared to the scramble control, suggesting that tuning the expression of ETV7 could bi-directionally affect the population of CD44+/CD24− cells (Supplementary Fig. 3H). We then tested whether the knock-out of ETV7 in SK-BR-3 cells, which express high levels of ETV7 and are characterized by a high percentage of CD44+/CD24− cells, could also affect this population. Notably, in a clone of SK-BR-3 cells knock-out for ETV7 we were able to observe a strong increase in CD24 expression, with consequent reduction in CD44+/CD24− population (Supplementary Fig. 3I, J).
Moreover, another feature of breast cancer stem cells is their potential to form spheres (i.e., mammospheres) when grown in non-differentiating and non-adherent conditions. We measured the mammosphere formation efficiency (MFE) of MCF7 cells over-expressing ETV7 and the relative empty control cells, and we noticed a significant increase in the MFE of MCF7 cells over-expressing ETV7 compared to the control (Fig. 3D, E). We then tested the propagation potential of mammospheres by passaging them in culture, and we could appreciate the ability of cells over-expressing ETV7 to generate second, third, and fourth-generation mammospheres (Fig. 3F). These data confirm that the over-expression of ETV7 in breast cancer cells can enhance the cancer stem-like cell properties and thus suggest a role for ETV7 in breast cancer stem-like cell plasticity.
Unfortunately, we could not obtain any mammosphere from T47D, which, when grown in non-adherent and non-differentiating conditions, could form only aggregates of cells with unorganized structure (data not shown).
ETV7 induces the repression of a signature of interferon responsive genes
In order to identify the molecular mediators of the biological effects caused by the over-expression of ETV7, we performed a transcriptome analysis on MCF7 and T47D cells over-expressing ETV7 or the relative empty plasmid by RNA-seq. Indeed, being ETV7 a transcription factor, we expect it to exert most of its effects via transcriptional control. The analysis of transcriptional data identified 5,387 genes differentially expressed (DEGs) in MCF7 and 1,883 in T47D cells over-expressing ETV7 as compared to empty controls, respectively (Fig. 4A). For each cell line, it was possible to observe a similar number of up- and downregulated genes, with 721 genes that were commonly regulated in the two cellular systems (427 commonly downregulated and 294 commonly upregulated genes), and a lower number of genes which were inversely regulated in MCF7 and T47D cells (Fig. 4A).
Given that most of the biological effects previously observed in cells over-expressing ETV7 were common to both the cell lines, we focused our subsequent analyses on the common DEGs. In particular, as ETV7 is known to be a transcriptional repressor, we were interested in the commonly downregulated genes, which could be regulated by ETV7 in a more direct way. Interestingly, the most significant terms obtained by the gene ontology analysis of common downregulated DEGs involved innate immune response and inflammatory response, with several terms referred to the pathogen/viral entry into the host (Supplementary Fig. 4A). Moreover, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) highlighted “Interferon_alpha_response” (Fig. 4B) and “Interferon_gamma_response” (Fig. 4C), i.e., the Hallmark gene sets comprising genes involved in the cellular response to type I or type II Interferons, respectively, as the only common significantly repressed gene sets enriched in cells over-expressing ETV7. From these analyses, we then obtained a signature of Interferon responsive genes significantly downregulated (FDR ≤ 0.05) in both the cell lines upon ETV7 over-expression (ETV7-regulated IFN-responsive gene signature; Fig. 4D). We selected for validation the genes of the signature whose Fold Change was lower than −2 in both the cell lines, and we were able to confirm by RT-qPCR the repression of the entire list in MCF7 (Fig. 4E) and T47D (Supplementary Fig. 4B) cells over-expressing ETV7, with the sole exception of CFB, whose significant repression could be validated only in T47D cells. Furthermore, to verify whether the regulation of these IFN-responsive genes can be bi-directionally regulated by ETV7, we silenced ETV7 both in MCF7 and T47D parental cells using siRNAs and analyzed the expression of some of the studied IFN-responsive genes (i.e., APOL6, IFI35, and IFITM2). Notably, we showed a significant upregulation of the three genes in response to ETV7 knock-down (Fig. 4F and Supplementary Fig. 4C, D), strengthening the role for ETV7 in their regulation at the transcript level. The same analysis was further expanded to other BC cell lines (i.e., MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, and HCC-70), confirming also in these additional cellular models the role of ETV7 in the negative regulation of these IFN genes (Supplementary Fig. 4E–I). We then decided to test the responsiveness of the selected genes to type I and type II IFN treatment in MCF7 cells. In particular, we chose to use IFN-β as type I IFN, given the previous data in literature suggesting a negative role for IFN-β in breast cancer stemness [56, 57], and IFN-γ as type II IFN, being the only member of this subfamily. Since, as mentioned above, ETV7 itself is a well-recognized Interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) [26, 28], we first analyzed its expression in response to IFN-β and IFN-γ in MCF7 cells. As expected, we observed a robust and significant induction of ETV7 expression in response to both types of IFNs, with a peak of induction at 8 h for IFN-β and 24 h for IFN-γ, confirming that ETV7 is strongly responsive to IFNs also in the breast cancer-derived MCF7 cell line (Fig. 4G).
We then analyzed the expression of the validated genes repressed by ETV7 in response to IFN-β and IFN-γ. Interestingly, all the analyzed genes, with the exception of ICAM1, were more responsive to IFN-β than to IFN-γ (Fig. 4H and Supplementary Fig. 4J).
IFN-β treatment partially reverses the ETV7-dependent breast cancer stem-like cells plasticity
Given the observation that the over-expression of ETV7 could modulate breast cancer stem-like cells content in both MCF7 and T47D cells, and that this effect was reflected by a strong repression of a signature of IFN-responsive genes at the transcriptional level, we hypothesized that, if the repression of the IFN-responsive genes was responsible for the observed biological effects, the stimulation of their expression by treatment with IFNs could possibly reverse the breast cancer stem-like cell plasticity related to ETV7 expression. Therefore, we performed long-term treatments of MCF7 Empty and ETV7 cells with either IFN-β or IFN-γ and analyzed the mammosphere formation efficiency of the cells. Strikingly, IFN-β, but not IFN-γ, could strongly inhibit the mammosphere formation capacity of MCF7 cells over-expressing ETV7 already at the first generation (Fig. 5A). Moreover, IFN-β treatment completely abolished the ability of the cells to propagate in vitro, as MCF7 cells over-expressing ETV7 could not generate second, third and fourth-generation mammospheres (Fig. 5B and Supplementary Fig. 5A, B). Our hypothesis was further supported by the analysis of CD44+/CD24− cell population in MCF7 and T47D cells treated with either IFN-β or IFN-γ for 2 weeks. Indeed, treatment with IFN-β, but not with IFN-γ, could revert the increase in CD44+/CD24− cells observed in the cells over-expressing ETV7 (Fig. 5C, D). These data suggest that the over-expression of ETV7 could drive breast cancer stem-like cells plasticity through the repression of a panel of IFN-responsive genes, as the treatment with IFN-β, to which most of the validated genes are responsive, could reverse the breast cancer stem cells enrichment. This concept is further supported by the observation that, even in MCF7 cells over-expressing ETV7 where a strong repression in the expression of the IFN-responsive genes was visible, most of these genes were still responsive to the treatment (Supplementary Fig. 5C).
ETV7-dependent repression of IFN-responsive genes shows prognostic value in breast cancer
To test whether the repression of the IFN-responsive genes expression mediated by ETV7 could be endowed with a prognostic significance in breast cancer patients, we first analyzed the expression of ETV7 in the breast cancer samples of the TCGA project (see “Materials and methods” for technical details). In accordance with a previous report , we could confirm a significantly higher expression of ETV7 in metastatic and primary solid tumors as compared to normal tissue (Fig. 6A). Moreover, the expression of ETV7 increased according to cancer aggressiveness, and it was significantly higher in basal-like samples compared to the other molecular subtypes (Fig. 6B). Based on these findings, we then examined whether the expression of ETV7-repressed IFN-responsive gene signature could have a prognostic value in breast cancer patients (TCGA cohort). Noteworthy, Kaplan–Meier plots revealed that the low expression of the signature was significantly correlated with a lower probability of disease-specific survival (DSS, Fig. 6C), overall survival (OS, Fig. 6D), disease-free interval (DFI, Fig. 6E) and progression-free interval (PFI, Fig. 6F). We may speculate that the ETV7-dependent repression of the IFN-responsive genes could drive a more aggressive form of breast cancer, which according to our preliminary data, could possibly be responsive to IFN-β treatment.
ETV7 is a poorly studied transcriptional repressor of the ETS family of transcription factors, which is mainly considered as an oncoprotein [24, 30]. Recently, it was shown that the expression of ETV7 is significantly higher in breast cancer tissues compared to normal breast , suggesting a possible role for ETV7 in breast cancer pathogenesis; however, the functions and impact of ETV7 expression in breast cancer are still to be elucidated. We have recently published a novel mechanism of ETV7-mediated resistance to the chemotherapeutic agent Doxorubicin which involves the downregulation of DNAJC15 tumor suppressor leading to an increased expression of ABCB1 efflux pump . In this work, we expanded the effects of enhanced ETV7 expression on breast cancer progression and resistance to conventional anti-cancer drugs. Indeed, we demonstrated that the over-expression of ETV7 in MCF7 and T47D cells was also associated with reduced sensitivity to other types of standard treatments, such as 5-FU (Fig. 1C–E and Supplementary Fig. 1C–F) and radiotherapy (Supplementary Fig. 2A–D). In MCF7 cells, this increased resistance was accompanied by the induction of some ABC transporters frequently responsible for chemoresistance in breast cancer (i.e., ABCB1, ABCC1, and ABCG2) (Fig. 1F), the increased expression of the anti-apoptotic proteins BCL-2 and Survivin (Fig. 1G), which were not observed in T47D cells over-expressing ETV7 (Supplementary Fig. 1G, J). A common feature observed in both MCF7 and T47D cells over-expressing ETV7 which could mediate the observed decreased sensitivity to 5-FU and radiotherapy treatments is the decreased proliferative potential observed in ETV7 over-expressing cells, since both 5-FU and radiotherapy efficacy depend on cell division (Fig. 2A, B). Indeed, the reduced cell proliferation, together with the observed increase in the expression of ABC transporters and anti-apoptotic proteins, are common drug resistance-associated properties [58,59,60].
Interestingly, we also noticed that the proliferation rate of the cells underwent a switch when the cells were grown in an anchorage-independent manner. In particular, the colony formation potential in soft agar was significantly higher in cells over-expressing ETV7, whereas an opposite effect was observed when the colony formation efficiency was measured on plastic-support (Fig. 2A, B vs. Fig. 2C, D). This observation suggests a plastic behavior of the cells over-expressing ETV7, which can adapt their proliferative potential to the environmental conditions.
Moreover, anchorage-independent growth is considered a pro-tumorigenic feature , suggesting that the over-expression of ETV7 may induce pro-tumorigenic effects in breast cancer cells. Given these observations, and the literature data reporting anti-differentiation roles for ETV7 , we hypothesized that the altered expression of ETV7 could affect the breast cancer stem cells population. Noteworthy, when we analyzed the CD44+/CD24low/- BCSCs subpopulation in MCF7 and T47D cells over-expressing ETV7, we detected a remarkable increase (from ~1% in cells transfected with the empty vector to >30% in both cell lines over-expressing ETV7) (Fig. 3A, B), with a respective change in CD44 and CD24 membrane expression upon ETV7 knock-down or knock-out in cell lines characterized by a high percentage of CD44+/CD24low/− population (Supplementary Fig. 3H, J). This fascinating finding could be explained by the fact that CSCs can also originate from differentiated non-stem cells, through de-differentiation of normal somatic cells acquiring stem-like characteristics and malignant behavior via genetic or heterotypic alterations, such as EMT . We also evaluated the effect of ETV7 over-expression on the protein levels of EpCAM, often used to identify BCSCs. Interestingly, both MCF7 and T47D cells over-expressing ETV7 showed and increased expression of EpCAM (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. 3E), further strengthening our findings on the ETV7-mediated breast cancer stemness. Another recognized marker for BCSCs is the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), a family of cytosolic enzymes responsible for the detoxification by oxidation of intracellular aldehydes and are involved in the retinol to retinoic acid oxidation during stem cells differentiation . Surprisingly, using ALDEFLUOR assay, we found that MCF7 and T47D over-expressing ETV7 had a reduced or unchanged ALDH activity, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3A, B), in contrast with what mentioned above. However, CD44+/CD24low/− BCSCs can overlap only partially with ALDH+ BCSCs, and present different properties. Liu and colleagues demonstrated that BCSCs can exist in two distinct states: a mesenchymal-like and an epithelial-like state . According to their work, CD44+/CD24low/− cells belong to the mesenchymal-like BCSCs, are primarily quiescent, highly invasive, and are localized at the tumor invasive front. Conversely, the ALDH+ cells are the epithelial-like BCSCs, are highly proliferative, characterized by the expression of epithelial markers, and are localized more centrally within the tumor mass . This model can somehow explain the contradictory data about CSCs and the EMT state, as some studies suggest a commonality between the two states , whereas others suggest that these processes are mutually exclusive , and this is further proof of cancer stem cell plasticity in BC, as BCSCs can switch between the two states.
In order to investigate genome-wide the mechanisms responsible for the effects of ETV7 observed in culture, we performed RNA-seq analysis on MCF7 and T47D cells over-expressing ETV7 and the relative controls. Since ETV7 is known to act as a transcriptional repressor, we focused our analysis mainly on the commonly downregulated genes and gene sets in MCF7 and T47D cells over-expressing ETV7. Interestingly, the enrichment analysis revealed significant repression of a signature of Interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) (Fig. 4B, D and Supplementary Fig. 4A). Notably, we validated these data with qPCR analyses in MCF7 and T47D cells over-expressing ETV7 (Fig. 4E, F and Supplementary Fig. 4B) and we confirmed that the silencing of ETV7 could restore their expression in several BC-derived cells (Supplementary Fig. 4C–I). Therefore, we hypothesized that, if ETV7 exerts its effect on breast cancer stem cell plasticity via the repression of IFN response genes, inducing the re-expression of these genes might possibly reverse the observed effects. We thus selected IFN-β and IFN-γ as representative of type I and type II IFN, respectively, and tested the responsiveness of the obtained signature of ISGs in MCF7 cells. Interestingly, despite the fact that several genes were classified as type II ISGs in the MSigDB Hallmark collection, almost all of the analyzed genes were more responsive to IFN-β than to IFN-γ (Fig. 4H and Supplementary Fig. 4J). This effect can suggest the presence of a novel negative feedback loop, given that ETV7 itself is induced in response to IFNs as we also confirmed by RT-qPCR (Fig. 4G). However, ETV7 expression did not affect STAT1 induction in response to IFN treatment, suggesting that the repression of the ISGs may act independently, or possibly downstream, on STAT1 activation (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Interestingly, we showed that the prolonged treatment of the cells with IFN-β, but not with IFN-γ, was able to rescue the effects on CSCs content tested both as CD44+/CD24low/− population (Fig. 5C, D) and by mammospheres formation ability (Fig. 5A, B and Supplementary Fig. 5A, B). The fact that IFN treatment, and in particular IFN-β, but not IFN-γ, can reverse the observed effects on CSC plasticity, supports the hypothesis that ETV7 mediates its functions via the repression of ISGs, as IFN-β is a stronger inducer of the ETV7-repressed genes compared to IFN-γ. Our results support the previous observations, which showed that immune-repressed triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) lacking endogenous IFN signaling were highly recurrent, therapy-resistant, and characterized by CSC-like features [67, 68]. Moreover, Doherty and colleagues recently showed that the treatment with IFN-β, which was able to restore the IFN signaling, could revert the CSCs properties observed in transformed mammary epithelial cells, suggesting it as a potential therapeutic approach for TNBC treatment . Our data strengthen these observations and provide a novel role for ETV7 in breast cancer stem-like cell plasticity. Lastly, we identified a gene signature of ETV7 downregulated genes endowed with prognostic relevance in breast cancer patients, suggesting a role for ETV7 and for this set of genes as possible biomarkers for BC prognosis (Fig. 6).
Taken collectively, our data reveal that the altered expression of ETV7 can affect the sensitivity of BC cells to some anti-cancer agents (i.e., Doxorubicin, 5-FU, and radiotherapy) and that it may accomplish this task by modulating the breast cancer stem cells plasticity. In light of these results, we can speculate that targeting CSCs in BC patients with IFNs (particularly IFN-β) prior (or in combination with) the administration of chemo/radiotherapy could enhance the efficacy of anti-cancer standard treatments.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.
Skibinski A, Kuperwasser C. The origin of breast tumor heterogeneity. Oncogene. 2015;34:5309–16.
Sonnenblick A, Fumagalli D, Sotiriou C, Piccart M. Is the differentiation into molecular subtypes of breast cancer important for staging, local and systemic therapy, and follow up? Cancer Treat. Rev. 2014;40:1089–95.
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ, et al. Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann. Oncol. 2011;22:1736–47.
Murphy CG, Dickler MN. Endocrine resistance in hormone-responsive breast cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016;23:R337–352.
Acharyya S, Oskarsson T, Vanharanta S, Malladi S, Kim J, Morris PG, et al. A CXCL1 paracrine network links cancer chemoresistance and metastasis. Cell. 2012;150:165–78.
Fletcher JI, Haber M, Henderson MJ, Norris MD. ABC transporters in cancer: more than just drug efflux pumps. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:147–56.
Zheng HC. The molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance in cancers. Oncotarget. 2017;8:59950–64.
Ajani JA, Song S, Hochster HS, Steinberg IB. Cancer stem cells: the promise and the potential. Semin Oncol. 2015;42:S3–17.
Cabrera MC, Hollingsworth RE, Hurt EM. Cancer stem cell plasticity and tumor hierarchy. World J Stem Cells. 2015;7:27–36.
Wang T, Shigdar S, Gantier MP, Hou Y, Wang L, Li Y, et al. Cancer stem cell targeted therapy: progress amid controversies. Oncotarget. 2015;6:44191–206.
Doherty MR, Smigiel JM, Junk DJ, Jackson MW. Cancer stem cell plasticity drives therapeutic resistance. Cancers (Basel) 2016;8:8.
Bisio A, Zamborszky J, Zaccara S, Lion M, Tebaldi T, Sharma V, et al. Cooperative interactions between p53 and NFkappaB enhance cell plasticity. Oncotarget. 2014;5:12111–25.
Bartel FO, Higuchi T, Spyropoulos DD. Mouse models in the study of the Ets family of transcription factors. Oncogene. 2000;19:6443–54.
Sharrocks AD. The ETS-domain transcription factor family. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:827–37.
Dittmer J, Nordheim A. Ets transcription factors and human disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1377:F1–11.
Oliver JR, Kushwah R, Hu J. Multiple roles of the epithelium-specific ETS transcription factor, ESE-1, in development and disease. Lab Investig. 2012;92:320–30.
Craig MP, Sumanas S. ETS transcription factors in embryonic vascular development. Angiogenesis. 2016;19:275–85.
Seth A, Watson DK. ETS transcription factors and their emerging roles in human cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:2462–78.
Tomlins SA, Laxman B, Dhanasekaran SM, Helgeson BE, Cao X, Morris DS, et al. Distinct classes of chromosomal rearrangements create oncogenic ETS gene fusions in prostate cancer. Nature. 2007;448:595–9.
Kar A, Gutierrez-Hartmann A. Molecular mechanisms of ETS transcription factor-mediated tumorigenesis. Crit Rev Biochem Mol. Biol. 2013;48:522–43.
Sizemore GM, Pitarresi JR, Balakrishnan S, Ostrowski MC. The ETS family of oncogenic transcription factors in solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:337–51.
Quintana AM, Picchione F, Klein Geltink RI, Taylor MR, Grosveld GC. Zebrafish ETV7 regulates red blood cell development through the cholesterol synthesis pathway. Dis. Model. Mech. 2014;7:265–70.
Numata M, Geltink RK, Grosveld G. The ETS transcription factor ETV7 exhausts hematopoietic stem cells by enhancing the cell cycle entry and cell proliferation. Blood 2013;122:733.
Kawagoe H, Potter M, Ellis J, Grosveld GCTEL2, an ETS. factor expressed in human leukemia, regulates monocytic differentiation of U937 Cells and blocks the inhibitory effect of TEL1 on ras-induced cellular transformation. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6091–6100.
Minutti CM, Garcia-Fojeda B, Saenz A, de Las Casas-Engel M, Guillamat-Prats R, de Lorenzo A, et al. Surfactant protein A prevents IFN-gamma/IFN-gamma receptor interaction and attenuates classical activation of human alveolar macrophages. J Immunol. 2016;197:590–8.
Qiao Y, Kang K, Giannopoulou E, Fang C, Ivashkiv LB. IFN-gamma Induces Histone 3 Lysine 27 trimethylation in a small subset of promoters to Stably silence gene expression in human macrophages. Cell Rep. 2016;16:3121–9.
Matz M, Heinrich F, Zhang Q, Lorkowski C, Seelow E, Wu K, et al. The regulation of interferon type I pathway-related genes RSAD2 and ETV7 specifically indicates antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation. Clin Transpl. 2018;32:e13429.
Cardone M, Kandilci A, Carella C, Nilsson JA, Brennan JA, Sirma S, et al. The novel ETS factor TEL2 cooperates with Myc in B lymphomagenesis. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;25:2395–405.
Carella C, Potter M, Bonten J, Rehg JE, Neale G, Grosveld GC. The ETS factor TEL2 is a hematopoietic oncoprotein. Blood. 2006;107:1124–32.
Numata M, Klein Geltink RI, Grosveld GC. Establishment of a transgenic mouse to model ETV7 expressing human tumors. Transgenic Res. 2019;28:115–28.
Harwood FC, Klein Geltink RI, O’Hara BP, Cardone M, Janke L, Finkelstein D, et al. ETV7 is an essential component of a rapamycin-insensitive mTOR complex in cancer. Sci. Adv. 2018;4:eaar3938.
Sang Y, Chen MY, Luo D, Zhang RH, Wang L, Li M, et al. TEL2 suppresses metastasis by down-regulating SERPINE1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015;6:29240–53.
Maeda O, Ando T, Ohmiya N, Ishiguro K, Watanabe O, Miyahara R, et al. Alteration of gene expression and DNA methylation in drug-resistant gastric cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2014;31:1883–90.
Piggin CL, Roden DL, Gallego-Ortega D, Lee HJ, Oakes SR, Ormandy CJ. ELF5 isoform expression is tissue-specific and significantly altered in cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18:4.
Alessandrini F, Pezze L, Menendez D, Resnick MA, Ciribilli Y. ETV7-mediated DNAJC15 repression leads to doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer cells. Neoplasia. 2018;20:857–70.
Ciribilli Y, Singh P, Spanel R, Inga A, Borlak J. Decoding c-Myc networks of cell cycle and apoptosis regulated genes in a transgenic mouse model of papillary lung adenocarcinomas. Oncotarget. 2015;6:31569–92.
Raimondi I, Ciribilli Y, Monti P, Bisio A, Pollegioni L, Fronza G, et al. P53 family members modulate the expression of PRODH, but not PRODH2, via intronic p53 response elements. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e69152.
Monti P, Ciribilli Y, Bisio A, Foggetti G, Raimondi I, Campomenosi P, et al. N-P63alpha and TA-P63alpha exhibit intrinsic differences in transactivation specificities that depend on distinct features of DNA target sites. Oncotarget. 2014;5:2116–30.
Ciribilli Y, Monti P, Bisio A, Nguyen HT, Ethayathulla AS, Ramos A, et al. Transactivation specificity is conserved among p53 family proteins and depends on a response element sequence code. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:8637–53.
Lombardo Y, de Giorgio A, Coombes CR, Stebbing J, Castellano L. Mammosphere formation assay from human breast cancer tissues and cell lines. J Vis Exp. 2015;52671.
Concordet JP, Haeussler M. CRISPOR: intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W242–W245.
Brinkman EK, Chen T, Amendola M, van Steensel B. Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:e168.
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21.
Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–30.
Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40.
Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16:284–7.
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–50.
Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdottir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP, Tamayo P. The molecular signatures database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 2015;1:417–25.
Colaprico A, Silva TC, Olsen C, Garofano L, Cava C, Garolini D, et al. TCGAbiolinks: an R/Bioconductor package for integrative analysis of TCGA data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:e71.
Doyle LA, Yang W, Abruzzo LV, Krogmann T, Gao Y, Rishi AK, et al. A multidrug resistance transporter from human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:15665–70.
Robey RW, Pluchino KM, Hall MD, Fojo AT, Bates SE, Gottesman MM. Revisiting the role of ABC transporters in multidrug-resistant cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:452–64.
Yamada A, Nagahashi M, Aoyagi T, Huang WC, Lima S, Hait NC, et al. ABCC1-exported sphingosine-1-phosphate, produced by sphingosine kinase 1, shortens survival of mice and patients with breast cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2018;16:1059–70.
Gu X, Shin BH, Akbarali Y, Weiss A, Boltax J, Oettgen P, et al. Tel-2 is a novel transcriptional repressor related to the Ets factor Tel/ETV-6. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:9421–36.
Fillmore CM, Kuperwasser C. Human breast cancer cell lines contain stem-like cells that self-renew, give rise to phenotypically diverse progeny and survive chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R25.
Doherty MR, Cheon H, Junk DJ, Vinayak S, Varadan V, Telli ML, et al. Interferon-beta represses cancer stem cell properties in triple-negative breast cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:13792–7.
Doherty MR, Parvani JG, Tamagno I, Junk DJ, Bryson BL, Cheon HJ, et al. The opposing effects of interferon-beta and oncostatin-M as regulators of cancer stem cell plasticity in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2019;21:54.
Igney FH, Krammer PH. Death and anti-death: tumour resistance to apoptosis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:277–88.
Pawlik TM, Keyomarsi K. Role of cell cycle in mediating sensitivity to radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2004;59:928–42.
Luqmani YA. Mechanisms of drug resistance in cancer chemotherapy. Med Princ Pract. 2005;14:35–48.
Schwartz MA. Integrins, oncogenes, and anchorage independence. J Cell Biol. 1997;139:575–8.
Yu ZR, Pestell TG, Lisanti MP, Pestell RG. Cancer stem cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44:2144–51.
Balicki D. Moving forward in human mammary stem cell biology and breast cancer prognostication using ALDH1. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:485–7.
Liu S, Cong Y, Wang D, Sun Y, Deng L, Liu Y, et al. Breast cancer stem cells transition between epithelial and mesenchymal states reflective of their normal counterparts. Stem Cell Rep. 2014;2:78–91.
Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, et al. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 2008;133:704–15.
Tsuji T, Ibaragi S, Hu GF. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cell cooperativity in metastasis. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7135–9.
Sistigu A, Yamazaki T, Vacchelli E, Chaba K, Enot DP, Adam J, et al. Cancer cell-autonomous contribution of type I interferon signaling to the efficacy of chemotherapy. Nat Med. 2014;20:1301–9.
Burstein MD, Tsimelzon A, Poage GM, Coyington KR, Contreras A, Fuqua SAW, et al. Comprehensive Genomic Analysis Identifies Novel Subtypes and Targets of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015;21:1688–98.
We thank CIBIO Next Generation Sequencing and CIBIO Cell Analysis and Separation Facilities for technical assistance. We are also thankful to Dr. U Pfeffer, Dr. Maiello, Profs. J Borlak, A Zippo, and A Provenzani for sharing cell lines and to Prof. A Cereseto group for sharing plasmids and their help with viral infections and SG-PERT assay. We appreciated Prof. Alberto Inga and Dr. Alessandra Bisio for sharing reagents and helpful discussions.
This work was supported by CIBIO Institutional Start-up funds (to YC) and by the PRIN 2017 grant of the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (to MF; No. 2017HWTP2K_005).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data from patients were retrieved from publicly available databases. Informed consent was not required for this study.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by I. Amelio
About this article
Cite this article
Pezzè, L., Meškytė, E.M., Forcato, M. et al. ETV7 regulates breast cancer stem-like cell features by repressing IFN-response genes. Cell Death Dis 12, 742 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-04005-y