Abstract
The positive results of the apatinib phase III trial have cast new light on treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, in terms of safety, apatinib toxicities may lead to a dose modification or treatment interruption. Therefore, proper intervention is urgently needed to help patients benefit from apatinib treatment. In this study, we found that apatinib promoted autophagy activation via upregulation of ATG7 expression and autophagy inhibition enhanced apatinib-induced apoptosis. With microRNA and circular RNA-sequencing analyses of GC xenograft models, we demonstrated that circRACGAP1 functioned as an endogenous sponge for miR-3657 to inhibit its activity and further upregulate ATG7 expression. Silencing of circRACGAP1 inhibited apatinib-induced autophagy, which was rescued by miR-3657. Moreover, knockdown of circRACGAP1 sensitized GC cells to apatinib via autophagy inhibition in vitro and in vivo. These findings provided the first evidence that the circRACGAP1-miR-3657-ATG7 axis mediates a novel regulatory pathway critical for the regulation of apatinib sensitivity in GC. Thus, specific blockage of circRACGAP1 may be a potential therapeutic strategy to reduce the toxicities of apatinib and enhance its therapeutic effect in human GC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide1. The morbidity of GC have already risen to the second place in China2. Despite certain advances in chemotherapy regimens and targeted therapies3, the 5-year survival of patients with advanced GC is disappointing4. Thus, further studies are needed to identify predictive biomarkers for selecting appropriate and effective treatments for patients with advanced GC.
Up to now, the results of most phase III studies of targeted therapies for advanced GC have been unsatisfactory, except for ToGA5, RAINBOW6, REGARD7, and the phase III trial of apatinib8. Apatinib is a novel and highly selectively inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) tyrosine kinase9 and has shown antitumor effects in various tumors10,11. Li et al.8 reported that apatinib treatment significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced GC refractory to two or more lines of previous systemic chemotherapies. However, a dose reduction is required to prevent apatinib toxicity such as grade 3–4 hand–foot skin reaction, grade 3–4 hypertension, and proteinuria (8.5%, 4.5%, and 2.3%, respectively)8,12. Therefore, certain measures, such as co-treatment, should be taken to reduce toxicity and help patients benefit from apatinib treatment.
The relationship between autophagy and apoptosis is complex. Autophagy can either promote or inhibit apoptosis under certain circumstances13, the mechanisms of which are related to the degradation of different pro-apoptotic or anti-apoptotic regulators by autophagy14,15. The role of autophagy in protecting cells from undergoing programmed cell death explains why the inhibition of autophagy has been shown to improve the response to other agents in some clinical trials16,17. In addition, concurrent autophagy inhibition has been reported to overcome the resistance of some tyrosine kinase inhibitors in human lung cancer, thyroid cancer, and bladder cancer18,19,20. Thus, our study was aimed at the potential role of autophagy inhibition in the co-treatment with apatinib.
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) were first discovered nearly 40 years ago21. Recently, with the development of deep RNA-sequencing technology, a growing number of studies have demonstrated that circRNAs are involved in biological processes and disease22,23. CircRNAs are characterized by a covalently closed loop structure with the 3′-end of the RNA joined to the 5′-end24. CircRNAs are more stable than their linear counterparts and the expression of circRNAs does not often correlate well with the expression of linear forms of the host genes25. Some studies have reported that circRNAs regulate cell growth, migration, invasion, and tumorigenesis22,23,26. In addition, circRNAs play significant role in autophagy27,28. Most of the circRNAs reported so far contain exons and can act as microRNA (miRNA) sponges to regulate gene expression29,30. However, the characterization and function of circRNAs in human cancer remain largely unknown.
In this study, we demonstrated for the first time that apatinib promoted autophagy activation via upregulation of autophagy-related gene 7 (ATG7) expression, whereas autophagy inhibition enhanced apatinib-induced apoptosis in human GC. miRNA sequencing (miRNA-seq) and circRNA sequencing (circRNA-seq) of the GC tumor xenografts from the control and apatinib groups were performed to further study the mechanism. The downregulated miRNAs of the apatinib group identified by miRNA-seq were further validated by quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR). Our results demonstrated that dysregulated miR-3657 might contribute to apatinib-induced ATG7 upregulation. With circRNA-seq and bioinformatics analyses, we demonstrated that circRACGAP1 might act as an endogenous sponge for miR-3657 to inhibit its activity. Moreover, under apatinib treatment, circRACGAP1 was upregulated and triggered autophagy via decreasing miR-3657 and increasing ATG7 levels in GC cells and xenografts. Furthermore, silencing of circRACGAP1 inhibited autophagy and promoted apatinib-induced apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. These findings provided the first evidence that the circRACGAP1-miR-3657-ATG7 axis mediates a regulatory pathway critical for the regulation of autophagy and apatinib sensitivity in GC. In addition, the correlation analysis among the expression of circRACGAP1, miR-3657, and ATG7 in GC patients verified the in vitro and in vivo results. Thus, specific blockage of circRACGAP1 could be a potential therapeutic target for autophagy inhibition in the context of apatinib use in GC.
Methods
Cell lines and culture
The human GC cell lines BGC-823 and HGC-27 were purchased from the Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. The cells were incubated in a humidified atmosphere under 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
Drug preparations and reagents
Apatinib (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA) was dissolved in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and then diluted with culture medium to the desired concentrations. DMSO added in the treatment group was equal to that in the control group with a final DMSO concentration <0.2% (v/v). Chloroquine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA).
Plasmids and transfections
The siRNAs specific for ATG7 and circRACGAP1, miR-3567 mimics, and miR-3567 inhibitors were synthesized by RiboBio (Guangzhou, China). The mRFP-GFP-LC3 plasmid was used to monitor autophagy flux as previously reported31. ATG7 plasmid and pcDNA3.1 plasmid were purchased from HanBio (Shanghai, China). Transfections were performed using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) or DharmaFECT 4 (Thermo Scientific, Lafayette, CO, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Clonogenic assay
BGC-823 cells or HGC-27 cells were seeded in 6-well plates (300 cells per well) and incubated overnight. Then, the cells were treated with apatinib at indicated concentrations for 24 h and further cultured in no-drug medium for 2 weeks. For colony scoring, the cells were stained with crystal violet (Beyotime Biotechnology, Nantong, China).
Cytotoxicity assay and apoptosis assay
The cells were seeded at 5000 cells per well in 96-well plates and incubated overnight. After a particular treatment, the cell viability was determined using Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cell survival rates are expressed as the means ± SD from three independent experiments.
Apoptosis was examined by flow cytometric analysis. The cells were treated with certain concentrations of apatinib for the indicated durations. Both floating and adherent cells were collected, stained with Annexin V–fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), and propidium iodide (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan), and further analyzed with a flow cytometer (FACScan, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with Cell Quest software (BD Biosciences). Apoptosis was also determined using the TUNEL (Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) apoptotic cell detection kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Apoptosis was expressed as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments.
Xenografts in mice
Female nude mice (6 weeks old) were purchased from Nanjing Biomedical Research Institute of Nanjing University (Nanjing, China) and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. The tumor xenograft models were conducted in nude mice bearing BGC-823 cells (model 1) or BGC-823 cells stably transfected with circRACGAP1 short hairpin RNA (shRNA) or control shRNA lentivirus (ViGene Biosciences, Rockville, MD, USA) (model 2). In total, 4 × 106 BGC-823 cells were subcutaneously injected into the right axilla of nude mice. When palpable tumors formed, the mice were separately randomized into each group. Then the mice were orally administered control vehicle or 50 mg/kg apatinib daily. Tumor volume was monitored every other day (volume = width2 × length × 1/2) for the duration of the experiment. Tumors were collected and weighed at the end of the experiment, and photos were taken at the same time. Six tumor tissues (C_1, C_2, and C_3 from the control group; A_1, A_2, and A_3 from the apatinib group) from model 1 were sent for miRNA-seq and circRNA-seq. Student’s t-test was performed to assess the differences between the two groups. All experiments were carried out according to the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication Number 80–23) revised in 1996.
Quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cell cultures by using the Trizol reagent (Gibco Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA was amplified with the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1. For miRNA quantification, Bulge-loopTM miRNA qRT-PCR Primer Sets (one RT primer and a pair of qPCR primers for each set) specific for miR-3657 and U6 were designed by RiboBio. Divergent primes were used for circRNAs to detect backsplice junctions and convergent primers were used for linear mRNAs. The qRT-PCR analysis was performed using AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix or miRNA Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech Co., Piscataway, NJ, USA) in an ABI Prism 7900 Sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Canada). The following thermal cycling conditions were used: 10 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Before calculation using the ΔΔCt method, the levels of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and 18S RNA were used to normalize the relative expression levels of mRNA and circRNA, and the levels of small nuclear U6 were used to normalize the miRNA expression levels. Student’s t-test was performed to assess the differences between different groups.
Western blotting, immunohistochemical staining, and antibodies
Western blotting and immunohistochemical staining were performed as previously described32. The antibodies used were as follows: monoclonal anti-GAPDH (loading control) (1:1000, Beyotime, Haimen, Jiangsu, China) and monoclonal anti-LC3B, SQSTM1, ATG7, and VEGFR-2 (1: 1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA).
Confocal microscopy
Cells transfected with mRFP-GFP-LC3 plasmid were seeded in 35 mm glass-bottom dishes and cultured overnight, followed by treatment with apatinib or control vehicle. After the indicated times, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. Then, the cells were washed with PBS and left in the dark before fluorescence microscopy analysis. Confocal images of cells were sequentially acquired with Zeiss AIM software on a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope system (Carl Zeiss Jena, Oberkochen, Germany). The autophagosomes are shown as yellow dots (RFP+GFP+), whereas the autolysosomes are shown as red dots (RFP+GFP−).
RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization
Cy3-labeled specific probes to circRACGAP1 were synthesized by RiboBio. FITC-labeled specific probes to miR-3657 were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The signals of the probes were detected by the FISH Kit (RiboBio), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Transmission electron microscopy
For the electron microscopy observation, the tumor xenograft tissues or tumor cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde immediately after removal. Samples were fixed using 1% osmium tetroxide, followed by dehydration with an increasing concentration gradient of ethanol and propylene oxide. Samples were then embedded in TAAB Epon (Marivac Canada, Inc., St Laurent, Canada), cut into 50 nm sections, and stained with 3% uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Images were acquired using a JEM-1010 electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
miRNA-seq and circRNA-seq
Following RNA isolation, the RNA was quantified (Qubit® RNA Assay Kit in Qubit® 3.0 Fluorometer; Life Technologies, CA, USA) and the quality was assessed (RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the BioAnalyzer 2100 system; Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Next, 3 μg total RNA (miRNA-seq) and 1 μg qualified RNA (circRNA-seq) per sample were used as input material for each library preparation. The library preparations were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform with a 50 bp single-end module (miRNA-seq) and an Illumina Hiseq X Ten platform with a 150 bp paired-end module (circRNA-seq). Then, the raw reads were filtered for subsequent analysis. CircRNA prediction was performed with circRNA Finder33 (https://github.com/bioxfu/circRNAFinder). The miRNA target genes and the circRNA–miRNA interactions were predicted using TargetScan34 (http://www.targetscan.org/) and miRanda35 (http://www.microrna.org/), and the intersection or union of target genes were treated as the final target genes.
Sanger sequencing
Sanger sequencing was applied to determine the full length of the amplification products. The divergent primers (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) were designed to confirm the backsplice junction of circRACGAP1. The distinct product of the expected size was amplified by outward-facing primers of circRACGAP1 and was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Tsingke, Nanjing, China).
RNA immunoprecipitation
The MagnaRIP RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation Kit (Millipore, MA, USA) was used for RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cell lysates were incubated with beads coated with 5 μg antibody against Argonaute-2 (AGO2) (Abcam, MA, USA) or control rabbit IgG with rotation at 4 °C overnight. Then, total RNA was retrieved and the expression of circRNAs and miRNAs was detected by qRT-PCR analysis.
Dual-luciferase reporter assay
The luciferase reporter plasmids encoding wild-type genes (ATG7 3′UTR-Wt, circRACGAP1 Wt) and mutated ones (ATG7 3′UTR-Mut, circRACGAP1 Mut) were produced by Geneseed Biotech (Guangzhou, China). The binding sites of ATG7 and circRACGAP1 were inserted into the Xhol and NotI sites of the psiCHECK2.0 plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in the dual-luciferase reporter assay. First, cells were plated on 24-well plates. Then, 500 ng luciferase reporter plasmid, 50 nM miR-3657 mimics and negative control were transfected into cells by applying Lipofectamine 3000. Cells were collected and analyzed following the manufacturer’s instructions by using the dual-luciferase assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) after 48 h of transfection. All experiments were repeated three times independently.
Tissue collection
We obtained ten GC tissues from patients who were diagnosed with GC based on histopathological evaluation and underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Human Research of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the means ± SD. The statistical significance of the differences between the cell lines was analyzed by the parametric unpaired Student’s t-test (two-sided). The correlation of the expressions of circRACGAP1, miR-3657, and ATG7 were established by Pearson’s correlation analysis. Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.
Results
Apatinib inhibits the growth and promotes the apoptosis of GC cells in vitro and in vivo
Colony-formation assays of BGC-823 cells and HGC-27 cells were conducted after 24 h of apatinib treatment (Fig. 1a, b). The results demonstrated that apatinib inhibited the proliferation of the two cell lines in a concentration-dependent manner. Flow cytometry assays confirmed the apoptosis induced by apatinib in BGC-823 cells and HGC-27 cells (Fig. 1c, d).
To evaluate the effectiveness of apatinib in vivo, we established tumor xenograft models in nude mice using BGC-823 cells. The mice were orally treated with control vehicle or 50 mg/kg apatinib daily for 14 days. The results showed that apatinib reduced the tumor volumes in the GC xenograft model (Fig. 1e–g). More necrosis was found in tumor sections of apatinib-treated mice compared with those of vehicle-treated mice by histological examination. In addition, immunohistochemical staining showed increased caspase 3 expression together with decreased Ki67 expression in the tumor xenograft tissues of the apatinib group compared with the expression in the tissues of the control vehicle group (Fig. 1g). Collectively, these results indicated that apatinib inhibits the growth and promotes the apoptosis of GC cells in vitro and in vivo.
Apatinib promotes GC autophagy activation in vitro and in vivo
The mechanisms by which apatinib promotes GC cell apoptosis have been reported in some studies11,36,37. However, the relationship between autophagy and apatinib and the mechanisms are not clear. To examine the potential relationship between autophagy and apatinib, we detected the expression of autophagy genes in vitro and in vivo. First, qRT-PCR analysis of the ATG genes were conducted in BGC-823 cells after apatinib treatment (Supplementary Fig. S1B). Apatinib increased the expression of multiple autophagy genes, with the change in the expression of the ATG7 gene being the most significant. Next, we confirmed that apatinib affected the ATG7 mRNA levels in the tumor tissues of BGC-823 cell-mediated xenografts (Fig. 2a) and in GC cell lines (Fig. 2b, c). These data suggested that apatinib might drive autophagy activation in GC. To examine this possibility, we performed autophagy functional assays in GC cells co-cultured with apatinib. Apatinib increased ATG7 protein expression and the LC3-II protein expression, as well as decreased sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) expression in BGC-823 cells and HGC-27 cells (Fig. 2d, e and Supplementary Fig. S1C) in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, apatinib-induced autophagic flux in BGC-823 cells and HGC-27 cells (Fig. 2f–i) transiently transfected with mRFP-GFP-LC3 plasmid. In addition, in the BGC-823 cell-mediated xenograft model, immunohistochemical staining showed increased LC3-II and ATG7 expression together with decreased SQSTM1 expression in the tumor tissues of the apatinib group compared with the expression in the tumor tissues of the control vehicle group (Fig. 2j). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) assay showed the formation of autophagic vesicles in the tumor xenograft tissues from the apatinib group (Fig. 2k). Thus, our data indicated that apatinib promotes GC autophagy activation in vitro and in vivo.
Silencing of ATG7 promotes apatinib-induced apoptosis in GC cells
We next examined the potential role of the autophagy pathway in apatinib sensitivity in GC cells. An autophagy lysosomal inhibitor, chloroquine, was used with or without apatinib to treat HGC-27 cells and BGC-823 cells. Combination of chloroquine and apatinib significantly inhibited cancer cells proliferation (Supplementary Fig. S2A and Fig. 3a, b). Moreover, the cell proliferation inhibition induced by apatinib was promoted by silencing of ATG7 in BGC-823 cells (Supplementary Fig. S2B). Knockdown of ATG7 decreased the LC3-II expression, increased SQSTM1 expression (Fig. 3c, d and Supplementary Fig. S2C, D), and promoted the BGC-823 cell and HGC-27 cell apoptosis induced by apatinib (Supplementary Fig. S2E and Fig. 3e, f). Collectively, the data strongly suggested that apatinib activates the autophagy pathway, whereas downregulation of the expression of the ATG7 promotes apatinib sensitivity in GC cells.
Apatinib activates ATG7 via downregulation of miR-3657
miRNAs often play significant gene-regulatory roles by pairing with target mRNAs and repressing their expression38. We hypothesized that dysregulated miRNAs might contribute to the increase in ATG7 expression. To test this hypothesis, miRNA-seq was performed in six tumor xenograft tissues from the BGC-823 cell-mediated xenograft model in Fig. 1g. Figure 4a shows the criteria we used to pick out the top ten most differentially downregulated miRNAs that might target ATG7. A qRT-PCR assay was conducted to confirm the expression of the ten downregulated miRNAs and miR-3657 was the most differentially expressed (Supplementary Fig. S3A). Bioinformatics analyses with TargetScan (Fig. 4b) and miRanda (Supplementary Fig. S3B) revealed that miR-3657 most likely targeted the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) regions of the ATG7 gene. The intersection of sequences obtained by the two miRNA target prediction softwares was proposed to be a potential binding site. Then, wild-type and mutant ATG7 reporter plasmids targeting the identified sequence were designed (Fig. 4b). Luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that miR-3657 suppressed luciferase activity in BGC-823 cells transfected with wild-type ATG7 reporter plasmid but not in those transfected with the mutant one (Fig. 4c). MiR-3657 expression was decreased in apatinib-treated GC xenograft tissues and GC cells compared with that in the control conditions (Fig. 4d–f). In addition, qRT-PCR showed that miR-3657 mimics decreased the mRNA levels of ATG7 and ATG7 mRNA expression was rescued by miR-3657 inhibitors in BGC-823 cells and HGC-27 cells (Fig. 4g, h). Also, western blotting confirmed the protein levels of LC3-II regulated by miR-3657 (Fig. 4i, j). Confocal microscopy analysis demonstrated that miR-3657 inhibitors induced the autophagic flux, whereas miR-3657 mimics decreased the number of autophagosomes in BGC-823 cells and HGC-27 cells transiently transfected with mRFP-GFP-LC3 plasmid (Fig. 4k). Thus, these data indicated that apatinib increases ATG7 expression via a selective loss of miR-3657.
CircRNA-seq of the tumor xenograft tissues from the apatinib group and control group
We next investigated the mechanisms by which apatinib upregulates ATG7 and downregulates miR-3657. CircRNAs have been reported to act as competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) sponges, interacting with miRNAs and influencing their activity30. Thus, we proposed the following hypothesis: certain circRNAs might function as a miR-3657 sponge and further regulate ATG7 expression. Hence, we performed circRNA-seq analysis to identify differentially expressed circRNAs between the control group and apatinib group in the BGC-823 cell-mediated xenograft model. In all samples, 19,904 distinct circRNA candidates were found, of which 3798 circRNAs have been found in circBase (Supplementary Fig. S4A). The Venn diagrams illustrate the relationships among the six sequencing samples of the circRNAs (Supplementary Fig. S4B, C). Considering the circRNA characteristics and ease of validation in future studies, circRNAs that met the following criteria were included in this study: exonic circRNAs expressed in every sequencing sample with a length <1000 nucleotides23. The differentially expressed circRNAs are shown in the heat map (Fig. 5a).
Then we confirmed the circRNA-seq results of these circRNAs from Fig. 5a in the tumor xenograft tissues by qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 5b). This analysis confirmed one of the most differentially expressed circRNAs (hsa_circRNA004582, chr12: 49991998–49992655). The corresponding parent gene of hsa_circRNA004582 is RACGAP1 (Rac GTPase activating protein 1). Thus, we termed this circRNA “circRACGAP1”. A qRT-PCR assay demonstrated that circRACGAP1 mRNA expression was upregulated in apatinib-treated GC cells (Fig. 5c, d). In addition, we examined the mRNA level of RACGAP1 in GC cells treated with apatinib. The results showed no difference in the mRNA expression of RACGAP1 between control and apatinib-treated GC cells (Fig. 5e, f). Therefore, the results excluded the hypothesis that miR-3657 might bind the corresponding parent gene of circRACGAP1.
Figure 5g shows the circular junction of circRACGAP1 confirmed by Sanger sequencing. RT-PCR with divergent primers detected circRACGAP1 in cDNA but not in genomic DNA (Supplementary Fig. S4D). The fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) indicated that circRACGAP1 mainly resided in the cytoplasm in BGC-823 cells (Fig. 5h). Taken together, these results confirmed the most differentially expressed circRNA-circRACGAP1 identified by circRNA-seq.
CircRACGAP1 acts as an endogenous sponge for miR-3657
Next, we constructed a circRNA–miRNA network (Supplementary Fig. S5) to visualize their interactions based on our circRNA-seq data and miRNA-seq data using bioinformatics analyses. A schematic model shows the possible binding sites of circRACGAP1 on miRNAs (fold change ≥2 or ≤−2) from the miRNA-seq analysis by miRanda, and the possible binding site of circRACGAP1 on miR-3657 is shown in red (Fig. 5i). To examine whether miR-3657 could bind to circRACGAP1, RIP for AGO2 in BGC-823 cells was performed, indicating that circRACGAP1 and miR-3657 were substantially accumulated in the AGO2 pellet (Fig. 5j). Bioinformatics analyses with bioinformatics tools TargetScan (Fig. 5k) and miRanda (Supplementary Fig. S4E) predicted that miR-3657 might target the 3′-UTR of circRACGAP1. Furthermore, luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that miR-3657 suppressed the luciferase activity in BGC-823 cells transfected with wild-type circRACGAP1 reporter plasmid but not in those transfected with the mutant one (Fig. 5l). The immunofluorescence experiment confirmed the co-localization of circRACGAP1 and miR-3657 (Supplementary Fig. S4F). Thus, these results indicated that miR-3657 binds circRACGAP1.
CircRACGAP1 modulates apatinib-induced autophagy via targeting miR-3657 and ATG7
With miRNA-seq and circRNA-seq, we found that circRACGAP1 might function as an endogenous sponge for miR-3657 and ATG7. A qRT-PCR assay demonstrated that silencing of circRACGAP1 increased miR-3657 expression and decreased ATG7 mRNA levels in BGC-823 cells (Fig. 6a–c) and HGC-27 cells (Fig. 6d–f). Moreover, the TEM assay showed that transfection with circRACGAP1 siRNA reduced the number of autophagosomes in BGC-823 and HGC-27 cells (Fig. 6g).
Apatinib-induced activation of circRACGAP1, which functions as a ceRNA sponge for miR-3657 and ATG7, led us to hypothesize that circRACGAP1 might regulate autophagy-mediated apatinib resistance. To test this hypothesis, BGC-823 cells and HGC-27 cells were cotransfected with circRACGAP1 siRNA or control siRNA, miR-3657 inhibitors or control inhibitors, and mRFP-GFP-LC3 plasmid, and followed by incubation with apatinib. The apatinib-induced autophagosomes and autolysosomes were reduced in circRACGAP1 knockdown BGC-823 cells and HGC-27 cells (Fig. 6h, i and Supplementary Fig. S6A, B), but rescued by transfection with miR-3657 inhibitors. In addition, the TEM assay confirmed that transfection with circRACGAP1 siRNA reduced the number of autophagic vacuoles in apatinib-treated BGC-823 cells, but rescued by transfection with miR-3657 inhibitors (Fig. 6j, k). Therefore, the data demonstrated that circRACGAP1 modulates apatinib-induced autophagy via targeting miR-3657 and ATG7.
Silencing of circRACGAP1 sensitizes GC cells to apatinib in vitro and in vivo via modulating autophagy
Next, we demonstrated that silencing of circRACGAP1 expression promoted apatinib-induced apoptosis, but rescued by transfection with ATG7 plasmid in GC cells (Fig. 7a, b). In addition, we established a tumor xenograft model in nude mice bearing BGC-823 cells stably transfected with circRACGAP1 shRNA lentivirus or control shRNA lentivirus. The transfection effect of circRACGAP1 shRNA lentivirus was confirmed in Supplementary Fig. S7. When palpable tumors formed, the mice were separately randomized into the control group or apatinib group. The results showed that silencing of circRACGAP1 promoted the antitumor effect of apatinib (Fig. 7c–e). TEM assay demonstrated that silencing of circRACGAP1 reduced the number of autophagic vacuoles of the xenograft tissues in the apatinib group (Fig. 7f). In addition, immunohistochemical staining of the xenograft tissues showed that transfection with circRACGAP1 shRNA lentivirus in the apatinib group decreased the expression of ATG7 and LC3-II, and rescued SQSTM1 expression compared with the expression in the tissues of the apatinib group transfected with control shRNA lentivirus (Fig. 8a). Collectively, these results demonstrated that silencing of circRACGAP1 sensitizes GC cells to apatinib in vitro and in vivo via autophagy inhibition.
Moreover, we examined the circRACGAP1, miR-3657, and ATG7 expression in ten GC tissues (Fig. 8b). Positive correlation was observed between circRACGAP1 and ATG7 (P = 0.0072). Negative correlations were observed between ATG7 and miR-3657 (P = 0.0343), and between circRACGAP1 and miR-3657 in GC tissue (P = 0.0150). Thus, the results of circRACGAP1-miR-3657-ATG7 axis in GC patients were in accordance with the previous conclusions from GC cell lines and animal experiments.
Discussion
In this translationally relevant study, we reported for the first time that specific blockage of circRACGAP1 may be a potential therapeutic strategy to enhance the antitumor effect of apatinib in GC. The results demonstrated that apatinib promotes autophagy activation via upregulation of ATG7 expression and autophagy inhibition promotes apatinib-induced apoptosis in human GC. With miRNA-seq and circRNA-seq analyses, our study provided new insights into the function of circRACGAP1. The results showed that circRACGAP1 acts as an endogenous sponge for miR-3657 to inhibit its activity and further upregulate the miR-3657-targeted gene ATG7. Silencing of circRACGAP1 inhibited apatinib-induced autophagy by downregulation of ATG7, which was rescued by miR-3657. Moreover, knockdown of circRACGAP1 sensitizes GC cells to apatinib via autophagy inhibition in vitro and in vivo. These findings provided the first evidence that the circRACGAP1-miR-3657-ATG7 axis mediates a regulatory pathway critical for the regulation of autophagy and apatinib sensitivity in GC (Fig. 8c).
To improve sensitivity to kinase inhibitors, current strategies attempt to target the same kinase in a different way39 or target a parallel signaling pathway40, whereas the strategy of inhibiting autophagy may represent an entirely independent process of reversing drug resistance41. Under most circumstances, autophagy constitutes a stress adaptation that suppresses apoptosis and promotes cell survival13. However, autophagy can also kill cells by type II or autophagic cell death, which is a form of nonapoptotic programmed cell death42. Interestingly, similar stimuli can induce apoptosis or autophagy and sometimes a mixed phenotype of autophagy and apoptosis. The mechanisms for these different phenotypes are related to the degradation of different pro-apoptotic or anti-apoptotic regulators by autophagy14,15. A role of autophagy in protecting cells from undergoing programmed cell death was found in some completed and ongoing phase I/II clinical studies concerning chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine43. In addition, inhibition of autophagy by chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine combined with chemotherapy, kinase inhibitors, or radiation therapy has been shown to improve antitumor activity16,17,18. Apatinib was reported to promote apoptosis in osteosarcoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma11,36,37. However, the relationship between autophagy and apoptosis, and the mechanisms had not yet been reported in GC. Moreover, whether inhibiting autophagy might reverse apatinib resistance in GC and the related mechanisms still remained to be resolved. In this study, we demonstrated that apatinib promoted autophagy activation in GC. Our study is the first to report that autophagy inhibition promoted apatinib-induced apoptosis via downregulation of ATG7 level in GC. The ATG7 gene plays a complex role in cancer therapy. Strohecker et al.44 reported that ATG7 initially showed antitumor efficacy at earlier stages of BRAFV600E-driven lung tumorigenesis via decreasing oxidative stress, whereas ATG7 promoted tumorigenesis by preserving mitochondrial function at later stages of tumorigenesis. Acute ATG7 ablation in mice with preexisting non-small cell lung cancer suppressed tumor growth via shutting off the mammalian target of rapamycin and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling45. These studies provided the rationale for targeting ATG7 in cancer therapy.
Furthermore, we report a novel autophagy regulatory mechanism in mediating tumor cell fate and tumor progression by a circRNA in response to apatinib treatment. CircRNAs are novel biomarkers for human GC, hepatocellular carcinoma development, and oral cancer46,47,48,49,50. Moreover, circRNAs participate in autophagy regulatory networks and mediate the transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of ATGs28,51. Huang et al.52 reported that circHIPK2 regulated astrocyte activation via the regulation of autophagy and endoplasmic reticulum stress by targeting MIR124-2HG and SIGMAR1. Hansen et al.30 reported that ciRS-7 acted as a sponge for miR-7 and increased the expression levels of miR-7 target genes. Herein, with miRNA-seq and circRNA-seq technology, we demonstrated that apatinib induces expression of circRACGAP1, which interacts with miR-3657 and as a result, miR-3657 repression of ATG7 mRNA is released, eliciting increased autophagy. In addition, silencing of circRACGAP1 inhibited autophagy and promoted apatinib-induced apoptosis via sponging of miR-3657 and further decreasing ATG7 expression in vitro an in vivo. Collectively, the circRACGAP1-miR-3657-ATG7 axis mediates a novel regulatory pathway critical for the apatinib sensitivity via regulation of autophagy in GC.
In this study, we proposed that knockdown of circRACGAP1 may be a potential intervention strategy to reduce the toxicities and promote the antitumor effect of apatinib via autophagy inhibition in GC patients. As circRNAs are stable in blood plasma and exosomes49,53, further study of monitoring the changes of plasma circRNAs levels and exosomal circRNAs levels may help distinguish patients with different curative effects. CircRNA biogenesis and expression has been reported to be regulated by different mechanisms: the core spliceosomal machinery, cis-elements, and RNA-binding proteins54,55,56,57,58. Our results showed that mRNA levels of RACGAP1 were not significantly different between the control group and apatinib group (Fig. 5e, f). Moreover, we detected the expression of some reported genes involved in circRNA biogenesis. We found that SF3A2 (splicing factor 3A2) was downregulated in apatinib-treated tumor xenograft tissues compared with that without apatinib treatment (Supplementary Fig. S8A), and silencing of SF3A2 increased circRACGAP1 expression (Supplementary Fig. S8B). In the follow-up study, we will provide more results of how apatinib affect circRACGAP1 expression and more systematic/in-depth molecular mechanisms.
Our previous study reported that JWA (adenosine diphophate-ribosylation-like factor 6 interacting protein 5, ARL6ip5) reversed cisplatin resistance in human GC59, whereas lower expression of JWA sensitized cisplatin-resistant GC cells to lapatinib-induced apoptosis32. Collectively, these three studies have led to the proposals for some significant therapy regimens in GC patients: higher expression of JWA may be used as a biomarker for cisplatin treatment, lower expression of JWA may be utilized to identify patients that would benefit from HER2-targeted therapy; in terms of the anti-angiogenesis therapy, silencing of circRACGAP1 may be a potential intervention strategy to reduce the toxicities and promote the antitumor effect of apatinib. These proposals may help select effective therapy regimens for specific patients and mitigate drug toxicities. Further clinical studies are needed to demonstrate the results for better personalized therapy regimens in GC patients60.
In conclusion, we report for the first time that the circRACGAP1-miR-3657-ATG7 axis mediates a regulatory pathway critical for the regulation of autophagy and apatinib sensitivity in GC. Specific blockage of circRACGAP1 can be utilized as a potential therapeutic target for autophagy inhibition in GC patients undergoing apatinib treatment. Furthermore, we postulate that circRACGAP1 might contribute to the further development of personalized therapeutics by combining its inhibitors with apatinib against human GC. These findings might provide new opportunities for prospective multi-institutional trials testing clinical applications of circRACGAP1 as a potential intervention target to promote the antitumor efficacy of apatinib in advanced GC patients.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424 (2018).
Chen, W. et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J. Clin. 66, 115–132 (2016).
Ychou, M. et al. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD Multicenter Phase III Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 1715–1721 (2011).
Lambert, R., Saito, H., Lucas, E. & Sankaranarayanan, R. Survival from digestive cancer in emerging countries in Asia and Africa. Eur. J. Gasrtoen Hepat. 24, 605–612 (2012).
Bang, Y. J. et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376, 687–697 (2010).
Wilke, H. et al. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 15, 1224–1235 (2014).
Fuchs, C. S. et al. Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 383, 31–39 (2014).
Li, J. et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of apatinib in patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 1448–1454 (2016).
Tian, S. et al. YN968D1 is a novel and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Sci. 102, 1374–1380 (2011).
Hu, X. C. et al. Multicenter phase II study of apatinib, a novel VEGFR inhibitor in heavily pretrnted patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Int J. Cancer 135, 1961–1969 (2014).
Peng, H. et al. Apatinib inhibits VEGF signaling and promotes apoptosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget 7, 17220–17229 (2016).
Fornaro, L., Vasile, E. & Falcone, A. Apatinib in advanced gastric cancer: a doubtful step forward. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 3822–3823 (2016).
Maiuri, M. C., Zalckvar, E., Kimchi, A. & Kroemer, G. Self-eating and self-killing: crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 741–752 (2007).
Castedo, M., Ferri, K. F. & Kroemer, G. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR): pro- and anti-apoptotic. Cell Death Differ. 9, 99–100 (2002).
Gump, J. M. et al. Autophagy variation within a cell population determines cell fate through selective degradation of Fap-1. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 47–54 (2014).
Rojas-Puentes, L. L. et al. Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of whole-brain irradiation with concomitant chloroquine for brain metastases. Radiat. Oncol. 8, 209 (2013).
Rosenfeld, M. R. et al. A phase I/II trial of hydroxychloroquine in conjunction with radiation therapy and concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Autophagy 10, 1359–1368 (2014).
Zou, Y. et al. The autophagy inhibitor chloroquine overcomes the innate resistance of wild-type EGFR non-small-cell lung cancer cells to Erlotinib. J. Thorac. Oncol. 8, 693–702 (2013).
Wang, W. et al. Targeting autophagy sensitizes BRAF-mutant thyroid cancer to Vemurafenib. J. Clin. Endocr. Metab. 102, 634–643 (2017).
Kang, M. et al. Concurrent autophagy inhibition overcomes the resistance of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in human bladder cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 321 (2017).
Hsu, M. T. & Coca-Prados, M. Electron microscopic evidence for the circular form of RNA in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells. Nature 280, 339–340 (1979).
Du, W. W. et al. Foxo3 circular RNA retards cell cycle progression via forming ternary complexes with p21 and CDK2. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 2846–2858 (2016).
Zheng, Q. et al. Circular RNA profiling reveals an abundant circHIPK3 that regulates cell growth by sponging multiple miRNAs. Nat. Commun. 7, 11215 (2016).
Jeck, W. R. & Sharpless, N. E. Detecting and characterizing circular RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 453–461 (2014).
Kristensen, L. S., Hansen, T. B., Veno, M. T. & Kjems, J. Circular RNAs in cancer: opportunities and challenges in the field. Oncogene 37, 555–565 (2017).
Yang, Q. et al. A circular RNA promotes tumorigenesis by inducing c-myc nuclear translocation. Cell Death Differ. 24, 1609–1620 (2017).
Yang, L. et al. Engagement of circular RNA HECW2 in the nonautophagic role of ATG5 implicated in the endothelial-mesenchymal transition. Autophagy 14, 404–418 (2018).
Han, B. et al. Novel insight into circular RNA HECTD1 in astrocyte activation via autophagy by targeting MIR142-TIPARP: implications for cerebral ischemic stroke. Autophagy 14, 1164–1184 (2018).
Memczak, S. et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature 495, 333–338 (2013).
Hansen, T. B. et al. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature 495, 384–388 (2013).
Ye, Y. et al. 3,3’-Diindolylmethane induces anti-human gastric cancer cells by the miR-30e-ATG5 modulating autophagy. Biochem. Pharm. 115, 77–84 (2016).
Ma, L. et al. JWA down-regulates HER2 expression via c-Cbl and induces lapatinib resistance in human gastric cancer cells. Oncotarget 7, 71790–71801 (2016).
Fu, X. & Liu, R. CircRNAFinder: a tool for identifying circular RNAs using RNA-Seq data. In: Proc. 6th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, BICOB 2014 (Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 2014).
Agarwal, V., Bell, G. W., Nam, J.-W. & Bartel, D. P. Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs. Elife 4, e05005 (2015).
Enright, A. J. et al. MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 5, R1 (2004).
Liu, K. et al. Apatinib promotes autophagy and apoptosis through VEGFR2/STAT3/BCL-2 signaling in osteosarcoma. Cell Death Dis. 8, e3015 (2017).
Zhang, H., Cao, Y., Chen, Y., Li, G. & Yu, H. Apatinib promotes apoptosis of the SMMC-7721 hepatocellular carcinoma cell line via the PI3K/Akt pathway. Oncol. Lett. 15, 5739–5743 (2018).
Bartel, D. P. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136, 215–233 (2009).
Baselga, J. et al. Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 379, 633–640 (2012).
Zhang, Z. et al. Functional genetic approach identifies MET, HER3, IGF1R, INSR pathways as determinants of lapatinib unresponsiveness in HER2-positive gastric cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 4559–4573 (2014).
Holohan, C., Van Schaeybroeck, S., Longley, D. B. & Johnston, P. G. Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 714–726 (2013).
Baehrecke, E. H. Autophagy: dual roles in life and death? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 505–510 (2005).
Levy, J. M. M., Towers, C. G. & Thorburn, A. Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 528–542 (2017).
Strohecker, A. M. et al. Autophagy sustains mitochondrial glutamine metabolism and growth of BrafV600E-driven lung tumors. Cancer Discov. 3, 1272–1285 (2013).
Karsli-Uzunbas, G. et al. Autophagy is required for glucose homeostasis and lung tumor maintenance. Cancer Discov. 4, 914–927 (2014).
Li, P. et al. Using circular RNA as a novel type of biomarker in the screening of gastric cancer. Clin. Chim. Acta 444, 132–136 (2015).
Shang, X. et al. Comprehensive circular RNA profiling reveals that hsa_circ_0005075, a new circular RNA biomarker, is involved in hepatocellular carcinoma development. Medicine 95, e3811 (2016).
Wang, F., Nazarali, A. J. & Ji, S. Circular RNAs as potential biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Am. J. Cancer Res. 6, 1167–1176 (2016).
Li, Y. et al. Circular RNA is enriched and stable in exosomes: a promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis. Cell Res. 25, 981–984 (2015).
Chen, L. et al. circRNA_100290 plays a role in oral cancer by functioning as a sponge of the miR-29 family. Oncogene 36, 4551–4561 (2017).
Zhang, J., Wang, P., Wan, L., Xu, S. & Pang, D. The emergence of noncoding RNAs as Heracles in autophagy. Autophagy 13, 1004–1024 (2017).
Huang, R. et al. Circular RNA HIPK2 regulates astrocyte activation via cooperation of autophagy and ER stress by targeting MIR124-2HG. Autophagy 13, 1722–1741 (2017).
Meng, S. et al. CircRNA: functions and properties of a novel potential biomarker for cancer. Mol. Cancer 16, 94 (2017).
Li, X. et al. Coordinated circRNA biogenesis and function with NF90/NF110 in viral infection. Mol. Cell 67, 214–227.e217 (2017).
Conn, SimonJ. et al. The RNA binding protein quaking regulates formation of circRNAs. Cell 160, 1125–1134 (2015).
Ashwal-Fluss, R. et al. circRNA biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell 56, 55–66 (2014).
Aktaş, T. et al. DHX9 suppresses RNA processing defects originating from the Alu invasion of the human genome. Nature 544, 115 (2017).
Ivanov, A. et al. Analysis of intron sequences reveals hallmarks of circular RNA biogenesis in animals. Cell Rep. 10, 170–177 (2015).
Xu, W. et al. JWA reverses cisplatin resistance via the CK2-XRCC1 pathway in human gastric cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1551 (2014).
Lee, H. J., Moon, J. Y. & Baek, S. W. Is treatment-emergent toxicity a biomarker of efficacy of apatinib in gastric cancer? J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 3823 (2016).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Number 81672896 and Number 81520108027), the National Key Research and Development Program: the key technology of palliative care and nursing for cancer patients (ZDZX2017ZL-01), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) (JX10231802), and Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Special Fund (BE2015666).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
All experiments were carried out according to the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication Number 80–23) revised in 1996. The animal studies were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Studies at Nanjing Medical University. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Human Research of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by G.M. Fimia
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, L., Wang, Z., Xie, M. et al. Silencing of circRACGAP1 sensitizes gastric cancer cells to apatinib via modulating autophagy by targeting miR-3657 and ATG7. Cell Death Dis 11, 169 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2352-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2352-0
This article is cited by
-
Insights on E1-like enzyme ATG7: functional regulation and relationships with aging-related diseases
Communications Biology (2024)
-
Post-transcriptional dynamics and RNA homeostasis in autophagy and cancer
Cell Death & Differentiation (2023)
-
Exosomal circRELL1 serves as a miR-637 sponge to modulate gastric cancer progression via regulating autophagy activation
Cell Death & Disease (2022)
-
The emerging roles of circular RNA-mediated autophagy in tumorigenesis and cancer progression
Cell Death Discovery (2022)
-
Transcription factor KLF15 inhibits the proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells via regulating the TFAP2A-AS1/NISCH axis
Biology Direct (2021)