ABSTRACT
Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 5A (EIF5A) is a translation factor regulated by hypusination, a unique posttranslational modification catalyzed by deoxyhypusine synthetase (DHPS) and deoxyhypusine hydroxylase (DOHH) starting from the polyamine spermidine. Emerging data are showing that hypusinated EIF5A regulates key cellular processes such as autophagy, senescence, polyamine homeostasis, energy metabolism, and plays a role in cancer. However, the effects of EIF5A inhibition in preclinical cancer models, the mechanism of action, and specific translational targets are still poorly understood. We show here that hypusinated EIF5A promotes growth of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells by directly regulating MYC biosynthesis at specific pausing motifs. Inhibition of EIF5A hypusination with the DHPS inhibitor GC7 or through lentiviral-mediated knockdown of DHPS or EIF5A reduces the growth of various CRC cells. Multiplex gene expression analysis reveals that inhibition of hypusination impairs the expression of transcripts regulated by MYC, suggesting the involvement of this oncogene in the observed effect. Indeed, we demonstrate that EIF5A regulates MYC elongation without affecting its mRNA content or protein stability, by alleviating ribosome stalling at five distinct pausing motifs in MYC CDS. Of note, we show that blockade of the hypusination axis elicits a remarkable growth inhibitory effect in preclinical models of CRC and significantly reduces the size of polyps in APCMin/+ mice, a model of human familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Together, these data illustrate an unprecedented mechanism, whereby the tumor-promoting properties of hypusinated EIF5A are linked to its ability to regulate MYC elongation and provide a rationale for the use of DHPS/EIF5A inhibitors in CRC therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is third most deadly and fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world1.
The disease typically begins as a benign adenomatous polyp, which develops into advanced adenoma with high-grade dysplasia and then to invasive cancer. In the early stages, cancer cells are confined within the wall of the colon and the disease can be cured by surgical excision. At later stages, cells cross the wall of the colon and reach the regional lymph nodes and CRC is curable in about 70% of cases with a combination of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. At final stage, the cells metastasize to distant sites and the prognosis becomes poor, with an average survival rate of 25–30 months with the current therapeutic approaches2,3. Despite the extensive characterization of the molecular alterations underlying CRC, the current therapeutic protocols include only a few drugs of limited efficacy and the overall survival rate is still unsatisfactory, especially in the advanced stages. For this reason, substantial effort is devoted at the identification of novel druggable molecular determinants of this disease, with the aim to identify suitable therapeutic targets.
Comprehensive molecular characterization of human CRC have led to the identification of genes and pathways that contribute to the initiation and progression of the disease.
The first molecular alteration occurring during colorectal tumorigenesis is a loss-of-function mutation of the APC gene, a genetic lesion found in the majority of CRCs that causes aberrant activation of the WNT-β-catenin pathway4. A germline mutation of the APC gene causes familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), a genetic disorder characterized by hundreds of polyps in the large intestine that, if left untreated, progress toward malignant carcinomas5,6,7. Mutations of additional genes and pathways, such as RAS-MAPK, PI3K, TGFβ, P53, SMAD4, and DNA mismatch repair pathways, contribute to the progression of CRC toward the different stages8.
Integrative analysis of the molecular alterations has revealed that nearly all CRCs have changes in MYC transcriptional targets9, and that the deregulated pathways all converge on the activation of this oncogene. Hence, these observations underscore the critical pathogenic role played by MYC in CRC and imply that its targeting could represent a valuable therapeutic option. However, although direct inhibition of MYC is difficult because of its flat structure, indirect targeting of its degradation or biosynthesis has been challenging due to the multiple compensatory mechanisms that restore its intracellular content. An alternative pursued strategy is the targeting of MYC-regulated pathways that are required for tumor growth10. In this regard, inhibition of Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the first and rate-limiting enzyme in the polyamine biosynthesis pathway, and a direct MYC transcriptional target11 has been proposed as a potential therapeutic option in malignancies driven by the MYC oncogenes, such as lymphoma and neuroblastoma10,12.
ODC catalyzes the conversion of ornithine into putrescine (PUT), which is then converted into spermidine (SPD) and spermine (SPM). The three polyamines (PUT, SPD, and SPM) are often elevated in cancer and inhibition of their biosynthesis, through the irreversible ODC inhibitor difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), significantly impairs tumorigenesis in preclinical and clinical settings13. Of importance, DFMO has been shown to be a promising chemopreventive tool in subjects with high risk of CRC development, such as FAP patients14.
The major limitation to the use of DFMO for long-term treatments is that cells eventually become resistant to this drug, because they restore the intracellular polyamine pool by upregulating polyamine transporters and uptake from the extracellular environment15. Thus, to overcome this intrinsic limitation, a better approach would be the inhibition of key polyamine-regulated processes required for the tumor-promoting properties of these molecules. In this regard, recent studies are pointing at the link between polyamines and translation, and in particular to the translation factor (EIF5A), whose activity is strictly dependent on the polyamine levels. Two isoforms of EIF5A have been described in mammals: EIF5A1 and EIF5A2, both activated by hypusination, a unique covalent modification that requires SPD as substrate16. Indeed, the n-butylamine group of SPD is transferred to lysine group of EIF5A by the enzyme deoxyhypusine synthase (DHPS) to form deoxypusine, which is then hydroxylated to hypusine by deoxyhypusine hydroxylase (DOHH)17,18. Hypusinated EIF5A functions mainly by facilitating translational elongation of specific transcripts, by alleviating ribosome pausing at specific stalling motifs, often containing proline residues19,20. Recent studies have shown that EIF5A is overexpressed in various cancers, including CRC, where it correlates with poor prognosis21. Also, previous reports have documented the therapeutic efficacy achieved by inhibition of hypusination with the specific DHPS inhibitor GC7 in some cancers22. However, the actual mechanism of action and the direct translational targets of DHPS-EIF5A axis, responsible for the tumor-promoting effects, still remain largely unknown.
Using pharmacological and genetic inhibition approaches, in the present work we have studied the effect of DHPS-EIF5A axis inhibition on CRC growth and investigated the molecular mechanism of action. Our work has led to the identification of MYC as a key translational target of hypusinated EIF5A and to the demonstration of the therapeutic efficacy of targeting this molecular axis in vitro and in vivo.
Results
Inhibition of hypusination limits CRC cell growth
We first studied the effect of the DHPS inhibitor GC7 on the growth of various human CRC cell lines (HT29, HCT116, SW480, and LoVo), characterized by distinct molecular alterations, typically found in the human disease23. As shown in Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a–b, the drug inhibited proliferation and EIF5A hypusination at micromolar doses, being the standard 100 μM concentration very effective in all cells tested. At this concentration, the drug did not significantly change the intracellular content of the three polyamines (PUT, SPD, and SPM) after 72 h of treatment. Similar results were obtained with the irreversible ODC inhibitor DFMO (Supplementary Fig. 1c–d), which significantly inhibited EIF5A hypusination and tumor cell growth, demonstrating the dependence on polyamine metabolism for CRC growth.
MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay showed the ability of GC7 and DFMO to decrease CRC cell viability (Fig. 1b), an effect that could not be attributed to apoptosis, as shown by the lack of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage (Fig. 1c), as well as by the unmodified percentage of apoptotic cells observed by flow cytometry analysis of annexin V and propidium iodide double staining (Fig. 1d).
Instead, the two drugs caused inhibition of cell cycle, as documented by an increase of the percentage of cells in G0/G1 phase at the expense S and G2/M phases (Fig. 1e).
Therefore, these data indicate that pharmacological blockade of the hypusination axis significantly prevents proliferation of CRC cells, in agreement with previous reports22,24,25,26.
To ascertain that the antiproliferative effect of GC7 was not due to off target effects, we performed lentiviral-mediated knockdown of DHPS in HCT116 cells. Both DHPS and hypusinated EIF5A were disrupted in shDHPS-expressing cells (Fig. 1f, right panel) confirming the efficacy of the knockdown. Proliferation rate and viability of DHPS-deficient cells were strongly reduced compared to control cells (Fig. 1f) and GC7 failed to further inhibit cell viability in cells lacking DHPS, indicating the specificity of the drug (Fig. 1f). Similarly, knocking down EIF5A caused a significant decrease of CRC cell growth, and cell viability was no longer reduced by GC7 treatment in EIF5A-deficient cells (Fig. 1g).
Collectively, these results demonstrate that inhibition of polyamine-DHPS-EIF5A axis elicits significant antitumor effects in CRC cells.
DHPS inhibition downregulates MYC
To understand the mechanisms underlying the antitumor properties of DHPS inhibition, we performed NanoString-based gene expression analysis. We used the nCounter PanCancer pathway panel for gene expression, which monitors 730 genes from 13 cancer-associated hallmarks pathways, including those that are typically altered in CRC27. We analyzed mRNAs from DHPS-deficient or control CRC cells: 570 genes were detected, while the remaining 160 genes were not expressed. Within the expressed genes, 69 transcripts (12.2%) were upregulated, 79 (13.8%) were downregulated, whereas 422 (74%) were not modulated by the lack of DHPS (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2). Notably, a relevant common regulator of the DHPS-modulated transcripts was the oncogene MYC, being 33% of the modulated mRNAs previously identified as transcriptional targets of this oncogene28,29,30,31,32 (Fig. 2b). Supporting these findings, immunoblotting analysis showed reduced levels of MYC (Fig. 2c) in cells lacking DHPS, compared to their control.
To determine whether the antitumor properties and reduced levels of MYC following DHPS inhibition could be related to alterations of one or more pathways commonly deregulated in CRC32 and able to impinge upon MYC function9, we analyzed the activation status of Wnt/β catenin, EGFR/MAPK, p53, and PI3K/AKT pathways in DHPS-depleted cells (Fig. 2c). Wnt/β catenin signaling, a pathway aberrantly activated in the majority of CRCs and a well-known regulator of MYC transcription33, was not affected by impaired hypusination, as shown by the unmodified β catenin protein levels and TCF/LEF-Luc reporter activity after DHPS inhibition (Fig. 2c–d). The levels of p53 were also not altered by DHPS inhibition as well as phosphorylated ERK and GSK3β, two markers of activation of the RAS-BRAF-MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways, respectively (Fig. 2c).
Therefore, these data demonstrated that DHPS inhibition downregulates MYC levels independently of other CRC oncogenic drivers.
Hypusinated EIF5A promotes MYC translation
To determine whether the observed MYC downregulation could be attributed to changes in mRNA levels, we performed quantitative PCR on CRC cells after DHPS inhibition.
As shown in Fig. 3a, GC7 treatment did not significantly change the levels of MYC mRNA compared to control cells, thus ruling out alterations of mRNA synthesis or turnover.
Moreover, DHPS inhibition did not modify MYC protein stability, as indicated by similar degradation rates in cells treated with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) in the absence or presence of GC7 (Fig. 3b). Similar results were observed after short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated knockdown of DHPS, being MYC mRNA levels and protein stability not modified by DHPS depletion (Supplementary Fig. 3a–b).
As these data suggested that DHPS-mediated hypusination is coupled to MYC translation, we next investigated whether the translational regulator EIF5A plays a direct role in this process. To this end, we first studied the effect of polyamine treatment on MYC protein levels, in the absence or presence of EIF5A. In analogy with other EIF5A-regulated translational targets (e.g., ODC or AZ1 and AZIN1)34, addition of PUT or SPD to polyamine-depleted media caused a marked increase of EIF5A hypusination and MYC protein, but not of MYC mRNA levels (Fig. 3c–d), and this upregulation was abrogated by the ablation of EIF5A, thus indicating the requirement of this translation factor. The effect of polyamines was not related to stabilization mechanisms, as witnessed by the unmodified turnover of MYC protein (Fig. 3e) after SPD administration.
Consistent with a role as a direct translational regulator, EIF5A was associated with MYC mRNA in CRC cells, as demonstrated by RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) carried out with EIF5A antibody (Fig. 3f).
To specifically address if DHPS inhibition affects MYC translation, we analyzed ribosome loading of MYC mRNA in polyribosome-fractionated DHPS-deficient vs. control (SCR) CRC cells.
As shown in Fig. 3g, cells lacking DHPS showed polysome accumulation compared to control cells, an effect typically observed upon ribosome stalling35. By contrast, the content of MYC mRNA in the corresponding fractions was not significantly different (Fig. 3h), whereas MYC protein levels were reduced (Fig. 3i).
Collectively, these results support the hypothesis that inhibition of hypusination causes an increased ribosome stalling, thereby reducing MYC biosynthesis.
EIF5A regulates MYC translation at tripeptide pausing motifs
As EIF5A has been described to regulate translation through multiple mechanisms34 potentially acting at different mRNA levels, we next sought to identify the mRNA region required for MYC translational regulation. To this end, using the CRISPR/Cas9 approach we generated ∆5′UTR-MYC and ∆3′UTR-MYC CRC cells carrying deletions of MYC 5′- or 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs), respectively (Fig. 4a upper panel). Inhibition of hypusination with GC7 continued to cause a decrease of MYC protein levels in both ∆5′UTR-MYC and ∆3′UTR-MYC CRC cells (Fig. 4a bottom left and right, respectively), indicating that the regulation does not require MYC UTRs but rather its coding region. In agreement with this hypothesis, DHPS inhibition caused a significant decrease of exogenous MYC protein, encoded by plasmids expressing human or mouse MYC coding region, but lacking UTRs (Fig. 4b–d). Similarly, SPD supplementation induced exogenous MYC protein, but not its mRNA levels (Fig. 4e–f), indicating that EIF5A promotes MYC translation by acting at the coding region.
Previous work demonstrated that EIF5A alleviates translational pausing of ribosomes at specific stalling motifs in yeast19. In particular, through ribosome-profiling screening, it was demonstrated that the absence of EIF5A causes stalling of ribosomes at the level of 29 different tripeptide motifs, which may or may not contain proline residues20,36. We analyzed the amino acid sequence of both human and mouse MYC CDS and found the presence of 5 potential stalling sites, located in mouse at aa positions: 43–45, 53–55, 243–245, 291–293, and 323–325, and conserved in human (Fig. 4g).
Mutation of all these five pausing sites (MYC 5 MUT) prevented the decrease of MYC protein levels caused by DHPS inhibition (Fig. 4h) or EIF5A ablation (Fig. 4i), confirming their involvement in the observed effect. By contrast, individual mutations of each of these motifs did not modify the inhibition of MYC protein levels after DHPS ablation (Fig. 4j and Supplementary Fig. 4a), indicating that multiple sites are required for the inhibitory effect.
Effect of DHPS inhibition in preclinical models of CRC and FAP
To determine the pathophysiological relevance of the DHPS-EIF5A axis in CRC, we first evaluated the effect of DHPS ablation on the growth of human CRC cells grafted into the flanks of athymic nude mice. DHPS-deficient CRC cells grew significantly slower then controls and at the end of the experiment tumor sizes, volumes, and weight of the explanted masses were greatly reduced compared to controls (Fig. 5a–c). Ki67 staining and EIF5A hypusination were markedly reduced in cells depleted for DHPS compared to the controls (Fig. 5d).
To evaluate the therapeutic benefit of pharmacological DHPS blockade in mouse tumor models, we studied the effects of GC7 treatment on the growth of grafted human CRC cells. We implanted HCT116 cells subcutaneously in nude mice and when the tumor volume reached 100 mm3, mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.)-injected daily with GC7 or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 15 days and the growth of tumor volumes monitored every 4 days. Treatment with GC7 significantly decreased tumor growth and caused a significant reduction of average tumor volume and weight compared to control (Fig. 5e–g), accompanied to a strong reduction of Ki67 staining and EIF5A hypusination (Fig. 5h).
To address the efficacy of DHPS inhibition on spontaneous intestinal tumorigenesis, we investigated the effect of GC7 treatment in APCMin/+ mice. This mouse model carries heterozygous inactivating mutation of APC allele, which is associated to multiple intestinal neoplasms, a phenotype reminiscent of human FAP37.
Loss-of-function mutation of APC gene in this mouse model causes aberrant activation of the Wnt/β catenin pathway with consequent upregulation of MYC, which plays a key role in the development of this disease4,33.
APCMin/+ mice were weekly injected with AOM (Azoxymethane) for 1 month to induce neoplasms and then treated with daily i.p. injections of GC7, for a total of 3 weeks (Fig. 5i). At the end of the treatment, mice were killed and the intestines explanted and analyzed. As shown in Fig. 5j (left panel), GC7 treatment significantly impaired the growth of intestinal polyps, resulting in a marked decrease of the size of the lesions (Fig. 5j right panel). The effect of the drug was associated to a decrease of MYC protein levels and hypusinated EIF5A in the analyzed polyps (Fig. 5k), confirming the efficacy of the treatment.
Taken together, these data demonstrate that inhibition of EIF5A hypusination provides therapeutic benefit in preclinical models of CRC and FAP.
Discussion
The involvement of elevated intracellular polyamines in colorectal tumorigenesis has been known for many years and many reports have documented the ability of the ODC inhibitor DFMO to limit tumor formation and progression in preclinical models, as well as its chemopreventive efficacy in clinical trials13. However, the effect of DFMO is transient, mainly because of the very short half-life of ODC protein and tight regulation of its biosynthesis and because cells reconstitute polyamine content by increasing the uptake from the extracellular environment, through upregulation of polyamine transporters13. Hence, there is an increasing interest for the identification of drugs that have the ability to stably reduce intracellular polyamine content or inhibit polyamine target/s involved in pathological processes regulated by these molecules.
Emerging evidence are showing that the translational regulator EIF5A mediates many of the known effects of polyamines, such as the regulation of cell proliferation, viability, migration, and autophagy16,38,39. Also, many studies show increased levels of EIF5A in tumor cells22. In particular, a previous report showed that EIF5A is overexpressed in CRC tissues, and that its elevated expression is associated to poor prognosis21. However, to date, only few reports have documented the effect of EIF5A inhibition on in vivo tumor growth and it is not clear which translational targets mediate the EIF5A effect.
In the present work, we have shown for the first time that pharmacological or genetic inhibition of EIF5A hypusination efficiently inhibits the growth of CRC cells in vitro and in vivo. Of note, the DHPS inhibitor GC7 showed a remarkable efficacy in limiting the growth of CRC cells and polyps in mice.
The use of GC7 as anticancer agent in animal models has been studied in a limited number of tumors. In particular, previous work showed that in KRas-mutated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells, EIF5A1-PEAK axis positively regulates KRas neosynthesis, thus enhancing ERK-MAPK signaling40 and promoting cancer growth and invasion. KRas in turn promotes EIF5A protein expression, thus generating a positive feed forward loop that promotes glutamine-dependent cancer cell growth. Notably, disruption of this mechanism with the DHPS inhibitor GC7 limits pancreatic tumor growth in vivo and sensitizes tumor cells to the treatment with MEK inhibitors40. Although the authors did not formally demonstrate that KRas is a direct translational target of EIF5A, this report provided a mechanistic explanation for the tumor-promoting effect of EIF5A in this type of malignancy.
In contrast with these studies, our data show that inhibition of CRC cells does not modify ERK content and phosphorylation, thus supporting the conclusion that EIF5A function is not coupled to KRas expression and activity in intestinal tumors.
Conversely, our data indicate that inhibition of polyamine metabolism and EIF5A hypusination suppresses MYC protein levels, regardless to KRas mutational status, being the effect observed also in HT29 CRC cells, where KRas allele is not mutated23 (Supplementary Fig. 4b).
The finding that MYC is downregulated by GC7 is of particular relevance, as targeting of this oncogene represents a challenging option in cancer therapy and as previous attempts to inhibit this oncogene in CRC with clinically approved translational inhibitors, such as mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, have failed41.
A link between polyamines and MYC biosynthesis was previously described in rat intestinal epithelial cells by Liu and collaborators. In particular, it was observed that polyamines regulate MYC biosynthesis by increasing Chk2-mediated phosphorylation of the mRNA binding protein HuR and its association to the 3′-UTR of MYC, thereby promoting its translation42. By contrast, our data seem to rule out the possibility that such a mechanism could operate also in our model since inhibition of DHPS still suppresses MYC translation in CRC cells deleted of MYC 3′-UTR. Instead, our data show the involvement of MYC coding region in this process, thus supporting the interpretation that EIF5A mediates translational elongation. In this context, a major function of EIF5A seems to be the suppression of ribosome pausing within the coding region occurring at specific pausing motifs, thereby facilitating elongation19,20.
Interestingly, a recent work by Manjunath et al.43 showed that EIF5A controls the start codon selection of mRNAs containing initiation codons upstream of the canonical ATG sequence, including MYC. Indeed, MYC translation can be initiated at either canonical ATG or upstream CTG codons, giving rise to two different isoforms: MYC2 (short, 64 kDa) and MYC1 (long, 67 kDa), respectively. The authors showed that, by alleviating ribosomal pausing at a single upstream tripeptide proline-proline-alanine (PPA) pausing motif, located between the two start codons, EIF5A regulates the start codon selection of MYC and favors the initiation at canonical ATG codon. However, the impact of this mechanism in tumorigenesis and its conservation throughout the species was not addressed in that report.
Our data indicate that inhibition of EIF5A hypusination reduces global levels of MYC in human and mouse cells, and causes inhibition of tumor growth.
Curiously, protein alignment of the N-terminal regions of MYC shows that the PPA motif and the surrounding region found in human43 are not conserved in mouse, suggesting a species specificity for the previously described mechanism. Of importance, our data indicate that both isoforms of MYC protein are downregulated by inhibition of EIF5A hypusination (Supplementary Fig. 4c–d), and that multiple pausing sites conserved between human and mouse CDS (Fig. 4g) are involved in the regulation. Therefore, our data support the conclusion that EIF5A plays a key role in controlling elongation of both MYC isoforms, by alleviating ribosome stalling at multiple common pausing sites.
Interestingly, a very recent work showed that GC7 treatment also inhibits p53 synthesis44. By contrast we did not see changes of p53 levels in CRC cells after shRNA-mediated DHPS ablation, suggesting that the observed effect could be related to the drug or the conditions used rather then to exclusive DHPS inhibition.
In conclusion, we have identified a novel mechanism whereby polyamines regulate MYC elongation through hypusinated EIF5A, by acting at specific pausing motifs. As MYC is also a key regulator of polyamine biosynthesis through ODC transcriptional activation, these findings imply that polyamines and MYC content are part of an integrated amplification loop that is aberrantly activated in tumors. Importantly, we have demonstrated that inhibition of this hypusination-dependent mechanism elicits significant therapeutic effects in preclinical models of CRC and FAP, thus representing a novel potential actionable target in these disorders (Fig. 5i). Further studies are required to establish the pharmacological properties of GC7 and its possible use in patients, alone or in combination with other drugs.
Materials and methods
Polysomal fractionation
For polysome fractionation, cells were treated with 100 μg/ml CHX for 5 min, washed twice with PBS solution, and lysed with 450 µl of TNM lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4 or 7.5, 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100) supplemented with 10 mM dithiothreitol, 100 μg/ml CHX, 1× PIC (#1187358001 complete, EDTA free, Roche, Mannheim Germany), and RiboLock RNase inhibitor (#EO0382 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Burlington, ON, Canada).
Lysates were incubated on ice for 10 min and then centrifuged. Supernatants were collected, loaded onto a 15–50% sucrose gradient, and ultracentrifugation was performed at 37,000 r.p.m. for 120 min with a SW41 rotor (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA).Fractions collection was performed using Biorad-BioLogic LP/2110 (Hercules, California,USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA extraction and real-time quantitative PCR were performed as previously described45,46,47.
RNA immunoprecipitation
RIP was performed as described previously48. HCT116 cells were plated in 56 cm2 tissue culture dishes and 24 h later cells were crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde solution for 10 min at room temperature, and then incubated with glycine (125 mM) for 5 min at room temperature. Pellets were lysed with FA Buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin), 50 U/ml RNase inhibitor SupeRNase, #AM 2694 Thermo Fisher Scientific) and sonicated. Samples were treated with DNase (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 25 mM MgCl2, 5 mM CaCl2, and SupeRNAse (AM 2694, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 10 min at 37 °C. The reaction was interrupted with the addition of 20 mM EDTA. Immunoprecipitation was performed incubating the samples with anti EIF5A antibody overnight as indicated in the Supplementary Table 2. The following day, protein A-agarose beads, previously incubated overnight with 200 µl FA buffer, 1 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA (#AM9680, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and RNAse Inhibitor were added to the lysate for 1 h at 4 °C in agitation; samples were washed extensively with four different solutions: low salt: 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100 2 mM, EDTA 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.005 U/ml SuperRNAse (Thermo fisher Scientific); high salt: 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 500 mM NaCl, and 0.005 U/ml SuperRNAse; LiCl buffer: 0.25 M LiCl, 1% NP40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, and 0.005 U/ml SuperRNAse; TE wash buffer: 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.005 U/ml SuperRNAse. Elution was performed with Elution buffer: 1% SDS, 0.1 M NaHCO3, SuperRNase 50 U/ml twice, and for 15 min at room temperature. RNA extraction was performed using Trizol reagent Thermo Fisher (#15596026). cDNA was obtained using SensiFAST™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline, London UK) and then analyzed by real-time PCR, with the indicated oligos.
Animal studies
Xenograft studies were performed as previously described49,50. Briefly, 2 × 106 HCT116 cells were resuspended in 50 µl PBS solution and mixed with equal volume of Matrigel (#354248 Corning, Corning NY, USA) and implanted subcutaneously in both flank of 8 weeks adult athymic nude mice (Charles River Laboratories Wilmington, MA, USA). Animals were divided in two groups (control: n = 8; GC7 treated: n = 8). When the average tumor volumes reached 100 mm3, mice were daily treated with 4 mg/kg GC7 i.p. and tumor sizes were measured every 4 days using a caliper.
For xenograft studies with DHPS-depleted cells, HCT116 cells were transduced with lentiviruses expressing shRNA targeting DHPS or nonspecific shRNA, as described above. Cells (2 × 106) cells were implanted subcutaneously in both flanks of 8-week-old adult athymic nude mice. Animals were divided in two subgroups (SCR: n = 6; shDHPS: n = 6). Measurements began when tumor volume reached 100 mm3 and were measured every 4 days using a caliper.
Volume was calculated as V = (L × W2)/2. Growth patterns were summarized graphically by plotting the mean and SD for each treatment group over time.
For in vivo treatments of APCMin/+ mice, 12-week-old APCMin/+ female mice were treated once a week with AOM (A5486, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO USA) and 12 mg/kg for 4 weeks, through i.p. injections. Mice were then i.p.-injected with 25 mg/kg GC7 for a total of 3 weeks and then killed. Intestines were explanted, cleaned, and washed in PBS. Polyp sizes were measured manually by using a caliper. Animal studies were performed according to the European Community Council Directive 2010/63/EU and were approved by the local Ethical Committee for Animal Experiments of the Sapienza University of Rome (Aut. n.877/2016-PR).
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed multiple times and, where indicated, in triplicate to reach statistical significance, as specified in the figure legends.
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.0 for Mac. Data were analyzed with a paired Student’s t-test, or analysis of variance and expressed as mean of three separate experiments ± SD. Data with *p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
References
Arnold, M. et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 66, 683–691 (2017).
Fernandez-Montes, A. et al. Current options for third-line and beyond treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Spanish TTD Group Expert Opinion. Clin. Colorectal Cancer 19, 165–177 (2020).
Capalbo, C. et al. A simplified genomic profiling approach predicts outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancers 11, 147 (2019).
Morin, P. J. et al. Activation of beta-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in beta-catenin or APC. Science 275, 1787–1790 (1997).
Fearon, E. R. & Vogelstein, B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 61, 759–767 (1990).
Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell 87, 159–170 (1996).
Arnold, C. N., Goel, A., Blum, H. E. & Boland, C. R. Molecular pathogenesis of colorectal cancer: implications for molecular diagnosis. Cancer 104, 2035–2047 (2005).
Markowitz, S. D. & Bertagnolli, M. M. Molecular origins of cancer: Molecular basis of colorectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 2449–2460 (2009).
Cancer Genome Atlas Network Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 487, 330–337 (2012).
Nilsson, J. A. et al. Targeting ornithine decarboxylase in Myc-induced lymphomagenesis prevents tumor formation. Cancer Cell 7, 433–444 (2005).
Bello-Fernandez, C., Packham, G. & Cleveland, J. L. The ornithine decarboxylase gene is a transcriptional target of c-Myc. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7804–7808 (1993).
Rounbehler, R. J. et al. Targeting ornithine decarboxylase impairs development of MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 69, 547–553 (2009).
LoGiudice N., Le L., Abuan I., Leizorek Y. & Roberts S. C. Alpha-difluoromethylornithine, an irreversible inhibitor of polyamine biosynthesis, as a therapeutic strategy against hyperproliferative and infectious diseases. Med. Sci. 6, 12 (2018).
Gerner, E. W., Bruckheimer, E. & Cohen, A. Cancer pharmacoprevention: targeting polyamine metabolism to manage risk factors for colon cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 18770–18778 (2018).
Casero, R. A. Jr, Murray Stewart, T. & Pegg, A. E. Polyamine metabolism and cancer: treatments, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 681–695 (2018).
Turpaev, K. T. Translation factor eIF5A, modification with hypusine and role in regulation of gene expression. eIF5A as a target for pharmacological interventions. Biochemistry 83, 863–873 (2018).
Park, M. H. The post-translational synthesis of a polyamine-derived amino acid, hypusine, in the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A). J. Biochem. 139, 161–169 (2006).
Park, M. H. & Wolff, E. C. Hypusine, a polyamine-derived amino acid critical for eukaryotic translation. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 18710–18718 (2018).
Gutierrez, E. et al. eIF5A promotes translation of polyproline motifs. Mol. Cell 51, 35–45 (2013).
Schuller, A. P., Wu, C. C., Dever, T. E., Buskirk, A. R. & Green, R. eIF5A functions globally in translation elongation and termination. Mol. Cell 66, 194–205 e195 (2017).
Tunca, B. et al. Overexpression of CK20, MAP3K8 and EIF5A correlates with poor prognosis in early-onset colorectal cancer patients. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 139, 691–702 (2013).
Mathews, M. B. & Hershey, J. W. The translation factor eIF5A and human cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1849, 836–844 (2015).
Ahmed, D. et al. Epigenetic and genetic features of 24 colon cancer cell lines. Oncogenesis 2, e71 (2013).
Bandino, A., Geerts, D., Koster, J. & Bachmann, A. S. Deoxyhypusine synthase (DHPS) inhibitor GC7 induces p21/Rb-mediated inhibition of tumor cell growth and DHPS expression correlates with poor prognosis in neuroblastoma patients. Cell. Oncol. 37, 387–398 (2014).
Zhang, J. et al. EIF5A1 promotes epithelial ovarian cancer proliferation and progression. Biomed. Pharmacother. 100, 168–175 (2018).
Landau, G., Bercovich, Z., Park, M. H. & Kahana, C. The role of polyamines in supporting growth of mammalian cells is mediated through their requirement for translation initiation and elongation. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 12474–12481 (2010).
Bugide, S. et al. Loss of HAT1 expression confers BRAFV600E inhibitor resistance to melanoma cells by activating MAPK signaling via IGF1R. Oncogenesis 9, 44 (2020).
Fernandez, P. C. et al. Genomic targets of the human c-Myc protein. Genes Dev. 17, 1115–1129 (2003).
Richart, L. et al. BPTF is required for c-MYC transcriptional activity and in vivo tumorigenesis. Nat. Commun. 7, 10153 (2016).
Mustachio, L. M., Roszik, J., Farria, A. T., Guerra, K. & Dent, S. Y. Repression of GCN5 expression or activity attenuates c-MYC expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 9, 1830–1845 (2019).
Dang, C. V. c-Myc target genes involved in cell growth, apoptosis, and metabolism. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 1–11 (1999).
Zeller, K. I., Jegga, A. G., Aronow, B. J., O’Donnell, K. A. & Dang, C. V. An integrated database of genes responsive to the Myc oncogenic transcription factor: identification of direct genomic targets. Genome Biol. 4, R69 (2003).
He, T. C. et al. Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science 281, 1509–1512 (1998).
Dever, T. E. & Ivanov, I. P. Roles of polyamines in translation. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 18719–18729 (2018).
Liu, S. et al. METTL13 methylation of eEF1A increases translational output to promote tumorigenesis. Cell 176, 491–504 e421 (2019).
Pelechano, V. & Alepuz, P. eIF5A facilitates translation termination globally and promotes the elongation of many non polyproline-specific tripeptide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 7326–7338 (2017).
Su, L. K. et al. Multiple intestinal neoplasia caused by a mutation in the murine homolog of the APC gene. Science 256, 668–670 (1992).
Lubas M., et al. eIF5A is required for autophagy by mediating ATG3 translation. EMBO Rep. 19, e46072 (2018).
Zhang, H. et al. Polyamines control eIF5A hypusination, TFEB translation, and autophagy to reverse B cell senescence. Mol. Cell 76, 110–125. e119 (2019).
Fujimura, K., Wang, H., Watson, F. & Klemke, R. L. KRAS oncoprotein expression is regulated by a self-governing eIF5A-PEAK1 feed-forward regulatory loop. Cancer Res. 78, 1444–1456 (2018).
Wiegering, A. et al. Targeting translation initiation bypasses signaling crosstalk mechanisms that maintain high MYC levels in colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov. 5, 768–781 (2015).
Liu, L. et al. Polyamines regulate c-Myc translation through Chk2-dependent HuR phosphorylation. Mol. Biol. cell 20, 4885–4898 (2009).
Manjunath, H. et al. Suppression of ribosomal pausing by eIF5A is necessary to maintain the fidelity of start codon selection. Cell Rep. 29, 3134–3146 e3136 (2019).
Martella, M. et al. Inhibition of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) hypusination suppress p53 translation and alters the association of eIF5A to the ribosomes. Int J. Mol. Sci. 21, 4583 (2020).
Di Magno, L. et al. The energy sensor AMPK regulates Hedgehog signaling in human cells through a unique Gli1 metabolic checkpoint. Oncotarget 7, 9538–9549 (2016).
Coni, S. et al. Selective targeting of HDAC1/2 elicits anticancer effects through Gli1 acetylation in preclinical models of SHH medulloblastoma. Sci. Rep. 7, 44079 (2017).
Antonucci, L. et al. Mitogen-activated kinase kinase kinase 1 inhibits hedgehog signaling and medulloblastoma growth through GLI1 phosphorylation. Int. J. Oncol. 54, 505–514 (2019).
D’Amico, D. et al. Non-canonical Hedgehog/AMPK-mediated control of polyamine metabolism supports neuronal and medulloblastoma cell growth. Dev. Cell 35, 21–35 (2015).
Di Magno, L. et al. Phenformin inhibits Hedgehog-dependent tumor growth through a complex I-independent redox/corepressor module. Cell Rep. 30, 1735–1752. e1737 (2020).
Di Magno, L. et al. Druggable glycolytic requirement for Hedgehog-dependent neuronal and medulloblastoma growth. Cell Cycle 13, 3404–3413 (2014).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr Raghu Mimira (Indianapolis, USA) for sharing the Hypusine antibody, Drs Sergio Nasi and Barbara Illi (lBPM-CNR, Rome, Italy) for MYC Mouse plasmid, and Dr. Debora Salerno and Ms. Martina Schito for technical assistance. The studies reported herein were financially supported by the following grants: AIRC IG 17575, IG 20801; Istituto Pasteur - Fondazione Cenci-Bolognetti; Italian MIUR (Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca), Dipartimenti di Eccellenza - L.232/2016; SAPIENZA University; “International Polyamines Foundation-ONLUS-ETS”; AFM-Telethon grant # 21025; Fondazione “Enrico ed Enrica Sovena” (scholarship to Z.N.Y. for supporting her PhD); S.C., L. Di Magno, and S.M.S. were supported by fellowships from Istituto Pasteur (Fondazione Cenci-Bolognetti).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.C. designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, wrote, and edited the manuscript. SMS performed experiments analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. Z.N.Y., L. Di Magno, R.B., C.B., Z.I., P.I., M. Moretti, and M.P. performed experiments. F.G. performed nanostring experiments together with S.M.S. V.L. performed bioinformatics analysis and wrote part of the manuscript. A.M. performed polyamines analysis. A.F., E.D.S., L. Di Marcotullio, M. Maroder, and E.A. analyzed the data and critically revised the manuscript. G.G. edited and critically revised the manuscript. G.C. conceived and coordinated the study, designed experiments, analyzed data, wrote, and edited the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by G. Melino
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Coni, S., Serrao, S.M., Yurtsever, Z.N. et al. Blockade of EIF5A hypusination limits colorectal cancer growth by inhibiting MYC elongation. Cell Death Dis 11, 1045 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-03174-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-03174-6
This article is cited by
-
AMD1 promotes breast cancer aggressiveness via a spermidine-eIF5A hypusination-TCF4 axis
Breast Cancer Research (2024)
-
Polyamine and EIF5A hypusination downstream of c-Myc confers targeted therapy resistance in BRAF mutant melanoma
Molecular Cancer (2024)
-
MYC upstream region orchestrates resistance to PI3K inhibitors in cancer cells through FOXO3a-mediated autophagic adaptation
Oncogene (2024)
-
Glutamine-derived aspartate is required for eIF5A hypusination-mediated translation of HIF-1α to induce the polarization of tumor-associated macrophages
Experimental & Molecular Medicine (2024)
-
Polyamines: their significance for maintaining health and contributing to diseases
Cell Communication and Signaling (2023)