Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

RALB GTPase: a critical regulator of DR5 expression and TRAIL sensitivity in KRAS mutant colorectal cancer

Abstract

RAS mutant (MT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is resistant to MEK1/2 inhibition and remains a difficult-to-treat group. Therefore, there is an unmet need for novel treatment options for RASMT mCRC. RALA and RALB GTPases function downstream of RAS and have been found to be key regulators of several cell functions implicated in KRAS-driven tumorigenesis. However, their role as regulators of the apoptotic machinery remains to be elucidated. Here, we found that inhibition of RALB expression, but not RALA, resulted in Caspase-8-dependent cell death in KRASMT CRC cells, which was not further increased following MEK1/2 inhibition. Proteomic analysis and mechanistic studies revealed that RALB depletion induced a marked upregulation of the pro-apoptotic cell surface TRAIL Death Receptor 5 (DR5) (also known as TRAIL-R2), primarily through modulating DR5 protein lysosomal degradation. Moreover, DR5 knockdown or knockout attenuated siRALB-induced apoptosis, confirming the role of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway as a regulator of siRALB-induced cell death. Importantly, TRAIL treatment resulted in the association of RALB with the death-inducing signalling complex (DISC) and targeting RALB using pharmacologic inhibition or RNAi approaches triggered a potent increase in TRAIL-induced cell death in KRASMT CRC cells. Significantly, high RALB mRNA levels were found in the poor prognostic Colorectal Cancer Intrinsic Subtypes (CRIS)-B CRC subgroup. Collectively, this study provides to our knowledge the first evidence for a role for RALB in apoptotic priming and suggests that RALB inhibition may be a promising strategy to improve response to TRAIL treatment in poor prognostic RASMT CRIS-B CRC.

Introduction

Mutations in RAS (KRAS and NRAS) in exon 2 (codon 12, 13), 3 (codon 59, 61) and 4 (codon 117, 146) occur in 55–60% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients1 and have been associated with poor survival2. Activating mutations in RAS lead to aberrant activation of RAS downstream effector signalling either by increasing its intrinsic GDP/GTP exchange rate or by reducing the rate of its intrinsic and GTP-ase activating protein (GAP)-induced hydrolysis3. RAS has proven difficult to target and inhibition of its downstream effectors MEK1/2 and AKT/PI3K has been shown to be ineffective in RAS mutant (MT) CRC4,5.

Like RAS, the RAS-like (RAL) small GTPases RALA and RALB are activated by RAL-selective guanine nucleotide exchange factors (RAL-GEFs), such as the RAL guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator (RALGDS), and are inactivated by GTPase activating proteins (RALGAPs). RALGDS couples RAS to the RAL proteins, stimulating the GDP/GTP exchange of RAL. In their active GTP-bound state, RALA and RALB can interact with a range of functionally different effectors, including RALBP1, EXO84 and SEC5, two distinct subunits of the hetero-octomeric exocyst complex, as well as with ZO-1-associated nucleic acid-binding protein (ZONAB)6. Previous studies have established the requirement for RAL-GEFs for the transformation of human epithelial cells7,8. Using a KRAS-driven murine lung carcinoma model, other investigators have shown that RALA or RALB activity is required for tumour growth9. RALA and RALB have also been shown to have opposing and/or distinct roles in migration and anchorage-independent growth in bladder, prostate and pancreatic cancer, respectively10,11,12.

In this study, we report a novel role for RALB in regulating Death Receptor 5 (DR5) protein levels and cell death in KRASMT CRC. Cellular and mechanistic studies indicate that RALB associates with DR5 and the death-inducing signalling complex (DISC) in a ligand-dependent manner, and that inhibition of RALB combined with DR5 agonists can be a novel treatment strategy for poor prognostic Colorectal Cancer Intrinsic Subtype (CRIS)-B13 KRASMT CRC.

Materials and methods

Materials

AZD6244, recombinant human (rh)TRAIL and z-VAD-FMK were purchased from AstraZeneca (Macclesfield, UK), Calbiochem (Hertfordshire, UK) and Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, Dorset, UK), respectively. Isoleucine-zipper TRAIL (iz-TRAIL) was expressed and purified in-house14. iz-TRAIL is a modified form of rhTRAIL that comprises an isoleucine zipper motif fused to its N-terminus, which enhances its ability to trimerise — a process required for its apoptotic activity, consequently increasing its potency. siRNA sequences targeting RALA (_8 SI03101133), RALB (_1 S100045199; _4 SI00045178; _6 SI03054793; _7 SI03117492), RALGDS (_5 SI03231424), Caspase-8 (_11 SI02661946) and Caspase-9 (_5 SI00299600) were purchased from Qiagen (Crawley, UK). siRNA sequences targeting DR4 and DR5 were purchased from Dharmacon. TRAIL neutralising antibody, Chloroquine and Bafilomycin A1 were purchased from R&D systems (Abingdon, UK), Invivogen (San Diego, CA) and Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany), respectively.

Cell culture

Authentication and culture of the HCT116, SW620, GP5d, LoVo, LIM1215 and COLO320 CRC cells have previously been described15,16. KM12 cells were obtained from the National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Cancer DCT Tumour repository (authentication: SNP arrays, oligonucleotide-base HLA typing, karyotyping and STR) and maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 (RPMI). DiFi, SW403, NCI-498 and HDC8 CRC cells were obtained from Dr. Montagut (Barcelona, Spain) and Prof. Bardelli, respectively17,18. HCT116 Caspase-8 wild-type (WT) and null paired cells, DR5 parental and knockout cells, and p53 parental and matched isogenic p53 null CRC cells were a gift from Prof. G. Lahav (Harvard Medical School, Boston)19, Prof. M. Rehm (University of Stuttgart) and Prof. B. Vogelstein (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore), respectively, and were grown in McCoy’s 5 A Modified Medium. All cells were passaged for a maximum of two months. Cell lines were tested for mycoplasma contamination every month using the MycoAlert™ Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza).

Western blotting

Western blotting and antibodies have previously been described15. Antibodies were used in conjunction with a HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibody. β-actin was used as a sample loading control. Details of the antibodies used have been included in Table S1. Western blot images were developed using the G:BOX Chemi XX6 gel doc system (Syngene). Densitometry on western blot images was performed using ImageJ software.

DR5-DISC IP assay

The DR5-DISC IP assay was performed as previously published20. The fully human agonistic DR5 antibody AMG 655 (Conatumumab; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) was conjugated to Dynabeads using the Dynabeads® antibody coupling kit (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. To the cells, 30 μL of AMG 655-conjugated Dynabeads® was added for the indicated time. The cells were lysed in lysis buffer (0.2% NP-40, 20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol; pH 7.4) supplemented with protease inhibitors. The AMG 655-conjugated Dynabeads® were captured magnetically, washed in lysis buffer, resuspended in Laemmli buffer and analysed by western blotting. Unbound fractions (inputs) were also collected and analysed by western blotting.

FLAG-co-immunoprecipitation

Protein lysates were prepared using SDS-free RIPA (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100 and 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.4). Lysates were incubated with anti-FLAG® M2 Magnetic beads (Sigma) overnight and isolated using a magnetic rack. After several washes, beads were resuspended in Laemmli buffer and heated at 95 °C for 5 minutes prior to immunoblot analysis.

RALB activity assay

GTP-bound RALB was isolated from whole cell lysates using a RALB activation Assay Kit (Merck Millipore). The assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Expression constructs and transfection

FLAG-tagged WT and constitutively active (G23V) RALB constructs were provided by Prof. Dan Theodorescu (Denver University, Colorado)21. Site-directed mutagenesis to generate the other RALB mutants (S28N, C203S) was performed using the KOD Xtreme™ Hot Start DNA Polymerase kit (Merck Millipore). DNA transfection was carried out using XtremeGene-HP reagent (Roche).

Proteome Profiler Human Apoptosis Array Kit

Array was analysed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D systems, Abingdon). Array densitometry was performed on the duplicate ‘spots’ using ImageJ software. Background intensity was subtracted from raw pixel density values. Normalised pixel density values were represented as a ‘fold-change’ relative to the control values, with error bars representing standard deviation from the mean.

Flow cytometry

Apoptosis was evaluated using propidium iodide (PI) staining to determine the percentage of cells with DNA content <2 N (sub-G1)15. The BD FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences) and Cell Quest Pro Software was used to perform PI staining flow cytometry. DR5 cell -surface expression flow cytometry was performed using a phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated DR5-specific antibody (12-9908-42, ThermoFisher Scientific) and a matched isotype control antibody (12-4714-41, ThermoFisher Scientific). The BD FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer and Cell Quest Pro Software were used to analyse geometric means for cell surface expression. Ten thousand events were counted per experiment for all the flow cytometry experiments.

High content screening

Annexin V (AV)/PI staining was evaluated using high content screening and performed in a 96-well plate (glass-bottomed plates, Cell Vis) format. Cells were seeded and treated as required (each treatment was performed in triplicate). Post-treatment, 1x AV Binding Buffer (10x concentrate, BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA), 1:1000 FITC Annexin V (BD Pharmingen), 0.333 µg/ml PI and 1.33 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were added to each well, and the plate was incubated for 20 min at room temperature. High content screening was performed using the ArrayScan™ XTI HCA Reader and the HCS Studio Cell Analysis Software V6.6.0 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Surrey, UK). The CrEST™ X-Light™ Confocal Scan Head (ThermoFisher Scientific) was integrated into the ArrayScan™ Reader, which enabled the capture of fluorescent microscopy images of cells. The ArrayScan™ collected multiple images until a maximum of 2000 cells was imaged per well.

Images were analysed using the HCS Studio Cell Analysis Software V6.6.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Briefly, the software calculated total death by quantifying cells that were AV stained, PI stained or both (cells were identified by nuclear Hoechst staining). This data was then graphed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.

Caspase-3/7 activity assays

Caspase-3/7-Glo® reagent (25 μl) (Promega, Southampton, UK) was incubated with 5 μg of protein lysate diluted in phosphate buffered saline in a total volume of 50 μl for 45 minutes at room temperature. Luciferase activity was measured using a luminescent plate reader (Biotek Synergy 4 plate reader).

Crystal violet assays

Cell viability was determined using crystal violet assays, as previously published22.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were seeded into 8-well chambers (ThermoFisher Scientific), incubated overnight and treated as required (each treatment was performed across duplicate chambers within an experiment). Cells were washed in phosphate buffered saline and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Cells were incubated with Alexa-488 labelled Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA) (Thermo Scientific Fisher, Cramlington, 1:2000) at room temperature (RT) for 5 minutes. Slides were then washed, permeabilised for 30 minutes (Tris-buffered saline, 10% goat serum (Abcam) and 0.1% Saponin (Sigma)) and left to block overnight (Tris-buffered saline, 5% Goat serum and 0.01% Saponin). Cells were incubated with DR5 (1:100) antibody for 1 hour at RT, followed by washing and were then incubated with Alexa Fluor-568 anti-rabbit secondary antibody (ThermoFisher Scientific, 1:500) for 30 minutes at RT, followed by washing. LAMP-1 (Abcam, 1:50) antibody was used in conjunction with Alexa Fluor-488 anti-mouse secondary antibody (ThermoFisher Scientific, 1:500). Counterstaining and mounting were performed using VECTASHIELD® anti-fade mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories). Images were captured using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope and a 63x lens at a 2x zoom, 1024 × 1024 frame and a 400 Hz scanning speed. Within an experiment, images were taken using fixed laser settings and exposure times. Images were acquired and processed using Leica Application Suite X (Las X). DR5 colocalisation with TGN46, Calnexin and LAMP1 across separate experiments was investigated using Manders’ colocalisation coefficient (MCC), which is a measure of the co-occurrence of staining intensities in pixels above threshold and was calculated using the JACOP plugin in ImageJ. This enabled the fraction of total DR5 fluorescence colocalising with the fluorescence of the second marker (for e.g. TGN46) to be calculated. A threshold was applied manually to all images using the built-in tool in JACOP. A 90° rotation negative control, where the MCC was re-calculated when the image of the second marker was rotated 90° clockwise, was employed to confirm that co-occurrence of staining was not random23.

Real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis

RT-PCR analysis was performed using the LightCycler® 480 probes master mix (LightCycler® 480II, Roche). ACTB and GAPDH were used as housekeeping genes. RNA was isolated using the GeneJET RNA purification kit (ThermoFisher Scientific); quantification and quality control (ratios for 260/280 nm >1.8 and for 260/230 nm >2) were performed using the NanoDrop™ One/OneC Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific). cDNA synthesis was performed using the Moloney murine leukaemia virus-based reverse transcriptase kit (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific). Catalogue numbers for real-time ready probes (Roche) are as follows: RALA- 115411, RALB- 148403, TNFRSF10B- 101236, ACTB- 101125, GAPDH- 101128 and RALGDS- 145711. PCR primers for FLIPL and FLIPS were purchased from Eurofins Genomics and were used in conjunction with LightCycler® 480 SYBR Green I Master mix (Roche). (FLIPL: Forward: 5′-CCT AGG AAT CTG CCT GAT AAT CGA, Reverse: 5′-TGG GAT ATA CCA TGC ATA CTG AGA TG; FLIPS: Forward: 5′-GCA GCA ATC CAA AAG AGT CTC A, Reverse: 5′-ATT TCC AAG AAT TTT CAG ATC AGG A).

siRNA transfections

siRNA transfections were carried out using HiPerfect (Qiagen) as previously described15.

Analysis of clinical data

The stage II/III CRC patient cohorts GSE103479 (n = 156)24, the GSE39582 (n = 481)25 and GSE14333 (n = 185)26 datasets, and their consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and Colorectal Cancer Intrinsic Subtypes (CRIS) classification have been described24. GSE59857 is a dataset comprising transcriptomic data for 155 established CRC cell lines. The COREAD dataset comprises protein abundance data for 50 CRC cell lines27. For survival analyses, the median value for RALB expression values was identified using the probe set corresponding to RALB (ADXECAD.28315_at and 202100_at). Patient samples were then allocated to one of two categories: RALB low and RALB high. Survival curves, comparing RALB low (grey) with RALB high (black) expression groups, were estimated with the Kaplan Meier method and compared by the log-rank test, using GraphPad Prism version 8 for Windows, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com. To assess RALB protein expression in clinical samples, we accessed fresh frozen matched CRC primary and normal tissues, collected during 2001–2002 at the Belfast City Hospital (REC49/01). This work was approved by the School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Science ethics committee (19.12V1). Consent was obtained from all patients.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was calculated from distinct technical replicates, by Student’s t-test (two-tailed, two-sample equal variance on unpaired data), one-way or two-way ANOVA in GraphPad Prism 8, unless specified otherwise. One-way ANOVA tests were used where multiple groups were compared to each other, whereas two-way ANOVA tests were performed to compare two factors (for e.g. siRNA and drug) across multiple groups. Multiple comparison analyses (for 1- and 2-way ANOVA tests) were performed using GraphPad Prism 8. Graphs were plotted as means with error bars representing standard deviation from the mean. Statistical significance is denoted as follows: **** = p < 0.0001, *** = p < 0.001, ** = p < 0.01, * = p < 0.05, ns = p > 0.05. Experimental phenotypes were confirmed in at least three independent experiments, unless specified otherwise.

Results

RALB is required for the survival of KRASMT CRC cells

Previous data from our lab have shown that RALA, but not RALB, regulates migration of KRASMT CRC cells28. We determined whether these two structurally related GTPases29 have similar roles in regulating the survival of KRASMT CRC cells (Fig. 1A). Although silencing of RALA resulted in minor decreases in the viability of KRASMT and WT CRC cells, siRALB was found to affect the viability of these cells to a greater extent. This was confirmed using additional siRNA sequences against RALB (Fig. S1A). Furthermore, overexpression of WT-RALB or constitutively active G23V-RALB markedly increased the colony-forming ability of KRASMT CRC cells (Fig. 1A). Importantly, siRALB resulted in cell death only in KRASMT but not in WT cells as determined by PARP cleavage, sub-G1 levels and Caspase-3/7 activation (Fig. 1B, C and Fig. S1A–C). siRALA did not induce cell death in KRASMT CRC cells (Fig. 1B, C and Fig. S1D).

Fig. 1: RASMT CRC cells are dependent on RALB for survival.
figure1

A Left: Crystal violet cell viability assay in KRASMT and KRASWT cells following transfection with 10 nM scrambled control (SC), RALA (siRALA) or RALB (siRALB) siRNA for 72 h. Cell viability values are presented relative to SC and the dashed line represents a 25% decrease in viability. Right: Clonogenic survival assay in HCT116 cells following transfection with 1 μg empty vector (EV), RALB wild-type (WT) or RALBG23V constructs and incubation for 14 days. Western blot (WB) analysis of FLAG-tag carried out in HCT116 cells transfected with EV, RALB-WT and RALBG23V constructs. β-actin was used as a loading control. B Top: WB analysis of PARP, RALA, RALB, pERK1/2T202/Y204 and ERK1/2 expression in HCT116 and LIM1215 cells, following transfection with SC, siRALA or siRALB and co-treatment with 1 μM AZD6244 for the indicated time. Bottom: Apoptosis was assessed by propidium iodide (PI) flow cytometry and Caspase-3/7 activity levels in HCT116 and LIM1215 cells, following transfection with SC, siRALA or siRALB and co-treatment with 1 μM AZD6244 for 24 h. C SW620 and GP5d cells were transfected with SC, siRALA or siRALB and co-treated with 1 μM AZD6244. PARP, RALA, RALB, pERK1/2T202/Y204 and ERK1/2 expression was determined by WB and β-actin was used to assess equal loading. Apoptosis was assessed by PI flow cytometry and by measuring Caspase-3/7 activity. D Top: WB analysis showing RALB expression in matched CRC (T) and normal (N) tissues. Equal loading was assessed by analysing β-actin expression. Bottom: Boxplots representing RALB protein abundance across CRIS subgroups in the COREAD dataset. E Boxplots representing the log2 gene expression values for RALB (probes ADXECAD.28315_at and 202101_s_at) across CRIS subgroups in GSE103479 and GSE14333 clinical datasets. Numbers underneath the boxplots (n) indicate the sample number per group.

KRASMT cancers are unresponsive to MEK inhibition (MEKi)30,31. A previous study has shown a role for RALB in mediating resistance to knockdown of NRASV12 in AML32. We therefore hypothesised that RALB has a potential role in regulating resistance to MEKi in KRASMT CRC. Co-treatment of RALB siRNA with the MEKi AZD6244 resulted in significant increases in cell death, determined by PARP cleavage, increased sub-G1 levels and Caspase-3/7 activity in HCT116 cells (Fig. 1B and Fig. S1B). This was not observed in KRASWT CRC cells (Fig. 1B and Fig. S1C). We extended these studies to include a panel of KRASMT (SW620, GP5D and LoVo) cells. In contrast to the HCT116 cells, addition of AZD6244 to siRALB resulted in no significant increases in cell death compared to the effect of siRALB alone in these cells (Fig. 1C and Fig. S1D). Furthermore, co-treatment of AZD6244 with siRALA did not increase cell death in KRASMT or WT cells. No consistent changes in expression levels of pERK1/2 were observed following siRALB or siRALA. Collectively, these results indicate that RALB, but not RALA, regulates survival of KRASMT but not KRASWT CRC cells.

Clinical relevance of RALB in CRC

Analysis of RALB expression revealed higher RALB levels in tumour compared to the matched normal patient tissues (Fig. 1D). To improve CRC patient management in the context of precision medicine, a recent study has identified five CRIS subtypes, with KRAS frequently mutated in CRIS-A, CRIS-B and CRIS-E13. Interestingly, in three publicly available CRC transcriptomic patient datasets (GSE39582/GSE103479/GSE14333)24,25,26, we found significantly higher levels of RALB gene expression in the poor prognostic CRIS-B subtype, compared to the levels observed in any of the other CRIS subgroups (Fig. 1E and Fig. S2A). Similar findings were made in the publicly available 155 CRC cell lines transcriptomic dataset GSE59857 (Fig. S2B) and the 50 CRC cell lines protein abundance COREAD dataset (Fig. 1D, lower)27. To assess the prognostic value of RALB, we interrogated an early-stage II/III CRC dataset (GSE103479). Analysis of RALB mRNA expression (LOW versus HIGH-RALB) in this dataset showed that, although patients with high RALB expression had a decreased overall survival compared to patients with low RALB expression (HR = 1.554; 95%-CI: 0.7701–3.135), this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.21) (Fig. S2C). Similar data were obtained using a second early-stage dataset (HR = 1.339; 95%-CI: 0.7889–2.489; p = 0.25) (Fig. S2C). Collectively, these data indicate that RALB is highly expressed in CRIS-B CRC, a poor prognostic subgroup in need of novel treatment strategies.

RALB depletion induces apoptosis in a Caspase-8-dependent manner

A previous study in KRASMT NSCLC found that RALB inhibits anchorage-independent growth in a p53-dependent manner33. In contrast to this study, no marked differences in cell death were found following siRALB in our p53-WT parental and isogenic p53 null HCT116 cells (Fig. S3A). Caspase-dependent apoptosis following siRALB was assessed using the pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-FMK, which completely attenuated increased sub-G1 levels, activation of PARP and Caspases-3/7 in KRASMT cells (Fig. 2A and Fig. S3B). To investigate further the relative importance of the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways in mediating siRALB-induced apoptosis, CRC cells were co-transfected with siRALB and siCaspase-8 or siCaspase-9. Notably, co-silencing of Caspase-8 with RALB resulted in inhibition of siRALB-induced PARP and Caspase-3/7 activity in both KRASMT HCT116 and SW620 cells (Fig. 2B). These results were confirmed using the Caspase-8 null HCT116 cells (Fig. 2C). We previously reported that HCT116 cells behave in a type II manner, with the extrinsic apoptotic pathway requiring mitochondrial amplification via the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in order to commit to apoptosis34. This model can explain why siCaspase-9 also decreased siRALB-induced apoptosis in the HCT116 cells (Fig. 2B). Collectively, these data suggest that the apoptosis induced by siRALB proceeds via a Caspase-8-mediated activation of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway.

Fig. 2: RALB silencing induces Caspase-8-dependent apoptosis.
figure2

A HCT116 cells were transfected with 10 nM SC, siRALA or siRALB and pre-incubated with DMSO or 20 μM of the pan-caspase inhibitor, z-VAD-FMK for 3 h followed by treatment with 1 μM AZD6244 for 24 h, following which apoptosis was assessed by PI flow cytometry (left), WB analyses for PARP and cleaved Caspase-8 (middle) and Caspase-3/7 activity assays (right). B CRC cells were transfected with 10 nM C8 or C9 siRNA for 24 h and were thereafter transfected with 10 nM RALB siRNA for 24 h. Apoptosis was assessed by WB analysis for cleaved Caspase-8, Caspase-9 and Caspase-3 (left) and Caspase-3/7 activity (right). C Paired CRISPR HCT116Caspase-8+/+ and HCT116Caspase-8-/- cells were transfected with 10 nM SC, RALA or RALB and co-treated with 1 µM AZD6244 for 24 h. Apoptosis was determined by WB for PARP, Caspase-8 (* indicates a non-specific band) and Caspase-7 (left), Caspase-3/7 activity levels (right, top) and PI flow cytometry (right, bottom).

RALB depletion increases total and cell-surface DR5 levels

Given the Caspase-8-dependent manner of siRALB-induced apoptosis, the expression of FLIPL/S, an endogenous inhibitor of Caspase-8 activation, was assessed (Fig. S3C). Although FLIPL mRNA levels were found to be slightly increased in the siRALB-transfected cells, FLIPL protein levels were unaffected. To further investigate the upstream mechanisms specifically involved in siRALB-induced apoptosis, a protein array was used to assess simultaneously the expression of 35 human apoptosis-related proteins in KRASMT cells, following transfection with siRALB, siRALA or siRALGDS (Fig. 3A and Fig. S4A–F). Notably, siRALB induced both pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic signalling responses. Significantly (2-fold cut-off; p < 0.05) increased levels of DR5/TRAIL-R2, XIAP and the anti-apoptotic Bcl2-family member Bcl-xL were found following siRALB; these did not change in the siRALA-transfected cells. We validated these array results by western blotting (Fig. 3A). Importantly, only DR5 levels increased dramatically as early as 24 h following transfection with siRALB but not in the siRALA or siRALGDS-transfected cells. DR4 was upregulated in both RALA and RALB knockdown cells. DR5 upegulation was confirmed with three additional siRNA sequences (Fig. S5A) and in three additional KRASMT CRC cell lines (Fig. 4A). The DR5 upregulation observed in RALB-silenced cells was not an indirect result of caspase activation, as inhibition of apoptosis using the Caspase-8 null HCT116 cells failed to prevent DR5 upregulation in RALB-silenced cells (Fig. S5B). Interestingly, silencing of RALB did not increase DR5 levels in KRASWT cells (Fig. S5C). Using immunofluorescence confocal microscopy, we further showed that siRALB resulted in a significant increase in DR5 staining intensity (Fig. 3A and Fig. S5D). Furthermore, DR5 cell-surface expression analysis in siRALB-transfected cells confirmed these results (Fig. 3B and Fig. S5E). Previous studies have shown that DR5 can signal from the intracellular ER-Golgi compartment, independently of TRAIL35. We therefore assessed the impact of RALB depletion on colocalisation of the Golgi marker TGN46 and the Endoplasmic Reticulum marker Calnexin with DR5, and found no increases in colocalisation of the two markers with DR5 when RALB was silenced (Fig. S5F, G). Although no significant negative correlations were observed between RALB and DR5 protein levels within the CRIS-B group, we found that the DR5/RALB ratio was the lowest in the CRIS-B group compared to the other CRIS subgroups (Fig. S2D–F).

Fig. 3: RALB silencing regulates DR5 expression levels.
figure3

A Top Left: HCT116 cells were transfected with 10 nM SC, siRALA, siRALB or siRALGDS for 24 h, following which cells were harvested for protein extraction. Protein was subsequently analysed using a human apoptosis array. Densitometry was performed on the array panels using ImageJ software, and results for DR4, DR5, Fas/CD95, FADD and TNFR1/TNFRSF1A are shown. Top right: PARP, DR5, DR4, FADD, XIAP, Bcl-xL, RALA and RALB levels in CRC cells following RALA, RALB and RALGDS silencing for the indicated times. Bottom left: Wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), a lectin that binds N-acetylglucosamine post-translational modifications on membrane receptors, was used as a plasma membrane marker. Fixed cells were stained with Alexa488-WGA prior to permeabilisation to minimise the staining of glycosylated proteins in the Golgi apparatus. A single confocal image was collected of the Alexa488-WGA stained membrane (green) alongside immunostained endogenous DR5 (red). Laser settings were kept constant between the samples to enable the comparison of membrane-associated DR5 staining in control (SC) and siRALB-treated cells. Bottom right: >20 cells were scored for intensity in ImageJ. The intensity was normalised to cellular area and plotted. The data are representative of three independent experiments. B CRC cells were transfected with 10 nM SC or siRALB for 24 h and DR5 cell-membrane expression was assessed by flow cytometry using a DR5-specific phycoerythrin-conjugated mAb. Expression was compared with an isotype-matched control antibody (IgG control). Geometric means (GM) for fluorescence intensity were plotted and significance was analysed using an unpaired t-test. C CRC cells were transfected with 10 nM siRNA targeting DR4 or DR5 for 24 h and were thereafter transfected with 10 nM RALB siRNA for 24 h. Apoptosis was assessed using WB for PARP, cleaved Caspase-8 and Caspase-3 (top) and Caspase-3/7 activity (bottom). (Asterisk next to the western blot indicates an unspecific band). D Paired CRISPR parental (control = CT) and DR5 knockout (KO) cells were transfected with 10 nM SC or RALB siRNA (siRB) for the indicated time. Apoptosis was determined by WB for PARP, Caspase-8 and Caspase-3 (left), Caspase-3/7 activity (right, top) and PI flow cytometry (right, bottom). E WB analysis for PARP and Caspase-8 (left) and Caspase-3/7 activity (right) of the effect of TRAIL neutralising antibody (nAb) treatment (100 ng/ml) on cell death in HCT116 cells transfected for 48 h with 10 nM SC or siRALB.

Fig. 4: DR5 expression is regulated by RALB through lysosomal degradation and p53-mediated transcription.
figure4

A Left: HCT116 cells were transfected with 10 nM of SC or 4 different siRNA sequences targeting RALB for 24 h. TNFRSF10B (upper) and RALB (lower) mRNA was quantified using RT-PCR. Raw values were normalised to the expression of housekeeping genes ACTB and GAPDH and were analysed using the ΔΔCT method. mRNA levels presented are relative to SC. Middle top: HCT116 p53 wild-type (WT) and null cells were transfected with either 10 nM SC or siRALB (two different sequences) for 24 h and the protein expression of p53, DR5 and RALB was determined using WB. Middle bottom: HCT116 cells were transfected with 10 nM of SC or four different siRNA sequences against RALB for 24 h. TP53 mRNA was quantified using RT-PCR. Analysis was performed as described above. Right: SW620, GP5d and LoVo cells were transfected with 10 nM SC or RALB siRNA (_6) for 24 h and DR5 expression was determined by WB. B Left: HCT116 cells were treated with siRNA targeting either SC or RALB for a total transfection time of 24 h. Cells were treated with 20 µM Chloroquine (CQ) for 4, 6 or 8 h. The expression of DR5, RALB, LC3-A/B and β-actin was analysed using WB. The numbers at the bottom of the WB panel represent densitometry performed on the DR5 blot using ImageJ. Middle: HCT116 cells were transfected with siRNA targeting either SC or siRALB and were treated with 50 nM Bafilomycin A1 for 3 h for a total transfection time of 24 h. The expression of DR5, RALB and β-actin was analysed using WB. The numbers at the bottom of the WB panel represent densitometry performed on the DR5 blot using ImageJ. Right: HCT116 cells were transfected with 1 µg of a WT FLAG-tagged RALB construct for 24 h followed by treatment with 20 µM Chloroquine for a further 24 h and DR5 and FLAG-tag expression was determined by WB. C Top: HCT116 cells were transfected with either empty vector (EV) or FLAG-RALB WT for 24 h. Cells were then fixed, permeabilised, blocked and stained with a lysosomal marker LAMP1, and DR5 antibody. Bottom left: Manders’ colocalisation coefficient (MCC) was calculated using ImageJ to measure the fraction of total DR5 fluorescence overlapping with LAMP1 fluorescence for each treatment and is presented in the ‘Merge’ image rounded to two decimal places. Image presented is representative of three independent experiments. Additional cells are presented in Fig. S5J. The MCC was calculated for over 50 cells across each treatment group over three independent experimental repeats and the analyses are presented in the graph. A 90° rotation negative control was employed to ensure colocalisation was not random. A Kruskal Wallis one-way ANOVA with a multiple comparisons test was performed in Prism to statistically analyse the data. Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean. Bottom right: HCT116 cells were transfected with either EV or FLAG-RALB WT for 24 h, and FLAG and DR5 expression was determined by WB. D Schematic of the role of RALB in regulating DR5 expression levels.

siRALB-induced apoptosis is DR5-dependent

To investigate whether DR4/TRAIL-R1 contributes in a similar manner to DR5 in regulating siRALB-induced apoptosis, specific siRNAs were used to decrease the expression of each receptor (Fig. 3C). Depletion of DR4 slightly reduced the Caspase-3 cleavage and Caspase-3/7 activity observed following siRALB in HCT116 cells (Fig. 3C). In contrast, co-silencing of DR4 and RALB in the SW620 cells did not decrease apoptosis compared to the levels observed with siRALB alone. Importantly, siDR5 completely abrogated siRALB-induced PARP, Caspase-3 cleavage and Caspase-3/7 activity in both KRASMT cell lines (Fig. 3C). These data were validated using WT and DR5-knockout HCT116 cell lines (Fig. 3D and Fig. S4G). Canonically, DR5-mediated activation of Caspase-8 and apoptosis is triggered following ligation of its ligand TRAIL, which is normally expressed on the cell surface of various immune cells36. Notably, co-incubation with a TRAIL neutralising antibody failed to rescue siRALB-induced apoptosis in KRASMT CRC cells (Fig. 3E). Taken together, these results would suggest a causal role for DR5, but not for DR4, in the cell death following siRALB in KRASMT CRC.

RALB reduces DR5 expression through enhancing lysosomal degradation

Previous studies have shown that DR5 may be transcriptionally upregulated by p5337 and that depletion of RAL-GTPases can stabilise p5333. We therefore analysed if the increased DR5 levels observed following siRALB was a result of transcriptional changes. Quantitative-PCR analysis showed that silencing of RALB, and not RALA, resulted in minimal increases in TNFRSF10B mRNA levels (1.19–1.46 fold) (Fig. 4A and Fig. S5H). No changes in expression levels of CHOP or the NFκB-inhibitor alpha (IKBα) protein, key transcriptional activators of DR538,39, were observed following siRALB (Fig. S5I). In addition, sip65 did not affect basal DR5 levels (Fig. S5I). Silencing of RALB resulted in minimal increased (1.26–1.36-fold) TP53 mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 4A). Although siRALB-induced DR5 upregulation was partially abrogated in the TP53 null HCT116 model (Fig. 4A), we also found strong DR5 increases following siRALB in SW620 cells expressing the clinically relevant DNA-binding-defective mutant p53-R273H (Fig. 4A and Fig. S5E). These results indicate that siRALB-induced DR5 upregulation can occur independently of p53.

Beyond a regulator of transcription factors, RALB is involved in vesicular trafficking and activation of the autophagosome/lysosome assembly, and this function may contribute to the accumulation of DR5 in RALB knockdown cells (Fig. 3A)40. Furthermore, a number of previous studies have shown autophago-lysosomal regulation of DR5 levels41. Therefore, we next determined the impact of RALB depletion on DR5 lysosomal degradation, using the lysosomal inhibitor chloroquine (CQ) (Fig. 4B). In agreement with other studies, we found that CQ resulted in increased DR5 levels42. Furthermore, siRALB markedly enhanced the upregulation of DR5 induced by CQ, while there was no further change in the autophagy marker LC3. Similar data were obtained using the lysosomal inhibitor Bafilomycin A1 (Fig. 4B)43. In addition, transient overexpression of RALB abrogated the increased DR5 expression levels following CQ treatment (Fig. 4B). Importantly, overexpression of RALB resulted in increased colocalisation of endogenous DR5 with LAMP1, as indicated by the MCC values, demonstrating that RALB regulates lysosomal localisation of DR5 (Fig. 4C and Fig. S5J). The proteasomal inhibitor MG132 did not affect siRALB-induced DR5 levels (Fig. S5K, left panel). We also compared the effect of siRALB on DR5 stability using the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. The result showed that the degradation rate of DR5 was unchanged in siRALB-transfected cells (Fig. S5K, right panel). Collectively, these data indicate that RALB can regulate DR5 protein levels by altering its trafficking to the lysosomal compartment for degradation (Fig. 4D).

RALB depletion sensitises KRASMT CRC cells to rhTRAIL

A number of studies have indicated that cell-surface TRAIL-receptor expression levels correlate with TRAIL-resistance/sensitivity44,45. As our results described above show that RALB depletion increases total and cell-surface DR5 levels, we hypothesised that RALB may be additionally involved in regulating sensitivity to TRAIL treatment in KRASMT CRC. Notably, rhTRAIL treatment markedly increased PARP, Caspase-8, -9 and -3 cleavage in RALB-silenced KRASMT cells (Fig. 5A). These results were confirmed quantitatively using Caspase-3/7 activity assays and Annexin V/propidium iodide staining (Fig. 5A, B). In addition, cell viability of RALB-depleted, rhTRAIL-treated KRASMT cells was significantly decreased compared with control siRNA-transfected cells (Fig. 5C). Similar effects were observed in a panel of KRASMT CRC cells and using two additional RALB siRNA sequences (Fig. S6A, B). Notably, RALB expression was acutely increased in 6/7 KRASMT cell lines in response to rhTRAIL treatment (Fig. 5A and Fig. S6A).

Fig. 5: RALB inhibition enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis in KRASMT CRC.
figure5

A CRC cells were transfected with 10 nM RALB siRNA for 24 h prior to treatment with rhTRAIL for the indicated time, (CT = control, untreated sample). Apoptosis was determined by using WB analysis for PARP, cleaved Caspase-8, -9 and -3 levels (top) and Caspase-3/7 activity (bottom). LE = long exposure. B HCT116 and SW620 cells were transfected with either SC or siRALB for 24 h followed by rhTRAIL treatment for a further 24 h. Apoptosis was assessed using Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) staining by high-content screening. The graph indicates the percentage of positive stained cells. C HCT116 and SW620 CRC cells were transfected with siRALB or control siRNAs and then treated with the indicated doses of rhTRAIL for 72 h. An MTT assay was used to evaluate cell viability, which is presented relative to SC control on the graphs. The dashed line indicates a 50% change in cell viability. D HCT116 cells were treated with Dinaciclib for 24 h, prior to treatment with rhTRAIL for 24 h. WB analysis for PARP, cleaved Caspase-8 and -3 (Left top), Caspase-3/7 activity assays (left bottom) and PI flow cytometry analysis of the sub-G1 apoptotic population (right bottom). HCT116 cells were treated with Dinaciclib for 48 h and expression of active (GTP-bound) and total RALB was evaluated using WB. CT refers to an untreated sample (right top).

The results described above clearly indicate that RALB downregulation sensitises KRASMT CRC cells to rhTRAIL-induced apoptosis. Previous studies have shown that Dinaciclib, a broad spectrum cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, is an efficient suppressor of CDK5-mediated activation of RALB32. In HCT116 cells treated with Dinaciclib, RALB activity was downregulated (Fig. 5D). In agreement with the results in RALB-depleted cells, Dinaciclib potently increased rhTRAIL-induced apoptosis (Fig. 5D). Similar results were obtained in the KRASMT SW620 and GP5d cells (Fig. S6C). Collectively, these findings indicate that RALB-targeted agents may be highly effective when used in conjunction with DR5 agonists to treat KRASMT CRC.

RALB associates with the DR5-DISC in a Caspase-8-dependent manner

To further elucidate the mechanism by which RALB regulates rhTRAIL sensitivity, we examined the effect of DR5 agonists on RALB subcellular localisation. Fractionation experiments showed that the primary localisation for both RALB and DR5 is the membrane in untreated CRC cells (Fig. 6A). To investigate whether RALB associates with the plasma membrane-bound DR5 receptor, we used the agonistic antibody AMG 655 that binds the extracellular domain of DR5. Our experiments showed that RALB was recruited to the DISC as soon as 3 h following incubation with AMG 655 (Fig. 6B, top left and Fig. S6D). As published previously20, FLIPL was present at the DISC exclusively in its Caspase 8-processed p43-form and FLIPS, FADD and Caspase-8 were also recruited. The clathrin adaptor protein 2 (AP-2) interacted with DR5 at the earliest time point indicating that endocytosis of the receptor–ligand complex is initiated at the plasma membrane upon ligand binding. Interestingly, increased proteolytic cleavage of the α subunit of AP2 (AP2α) occurred in a time-dependent manner, consistent with the results of a previous study46. The unbound fraction showed decreases in pro-Caspase 8 and FADD over time, consistent with increased recruitment of DISC components to the membrane in response to AMG 655 treatment (Fig. 6B, top right). Notably, silencing of RALB markedly reduced RALB recruited to the DISC, 1 h and 3 h following incubation with AMG 655 (Fig. 6B, bottom). We further investigated TRAIL-induced RALB recruitment to the DR5-DISC by immunoprecipitating FLAG-tagged RALB from untreated and TRAIL-treated cells and then immunoblotting for the presence of Myc-tagged DR5 (Fig. 6C). In agreement with the results described above, binding of RALB to DR5 occurred in TRAIL-treated cells. Furthermore, TRAIL treatment failed to recruit RALB to the DR5-DISC in Caspase-8 null cells, suggesting that the interaction between DR5 and RALB is Caspase-8-dependent (Fig. 6D).

Fig. 6: rhTRAIL treatment results in association of RALB with the DR5-DISC (DR5-bound death-inducing signalling complex).
figure6

A Membrane (MF) and cytosolic (CF) fractions were isolated from HCT116 cells, and equal amounts of protein were immunoblotted for DR5, RALB, EGFR and MEK1/2. WCL = whole-cell lysate B Top: WB analysis of DR5-DISC IP performed in HCT116 cells. The DR5-DISC was captured magnetically after the addition of AMG 655-conjugated beads to cells for the indicated times. Co-immunoprecipitation of RALB, AP2α, FLIP, FADD and Caspase-8 was assessed and pull-down of DR5 confirmed. Protein expression in the non-DISC recruited fraction (unbound fraction) was also analysed. Bottom: HCT116 cells were transfected with either SC or siRALB for 24 h. A DR5-DISC IP was performed as described above, following a 1 h and 3 h incubation with AMG 655-conjugated beads. Co-immunoprecipitation of RALB, FLIP, FADD and Caspase-8 was assessed and pull-down of DR5 confirmed. Protein expression in the non-DISC recruited fraction (unbound fraction) was also analysed. C HCT116 cells were transiently transfected with empty vector (EV), FLAG-RALB WT and C-terminal Myc-tagged long isoform of DR5 (DR5L) for 24 h followed by incubation with 0.5 ng/ml isoleucine zipper (iz)-TRAIL for 5 h. FLAG-RALB was immunoprecipitated using Anti-FLAG® M2 dynabeads and the expression of Myc-tag and FLAG-tag was determined by WB. Protein expression for Myc and FLAG were also determined by WB in the input lysates. D HCT116Caspase-8+/+ and HCT116Caspase-8−/− cells were incubated with AMG 655-conjugated dynabeads for 1 h and 3 h. The DR5-DISC was isolated and expression of RALB, Caspase-8, FLIP, FADD and DR5 was determined by WB. Protein expression in the unbound fraction was also analysed. E Top: HCT116 cells were transiently transfected for 24 h with 1 µg of EV, FLAG-RALB WT, FLAG-RALB G23V (constitutively active), FLAG-RALB S28N (dominant negative) or FLAG-RALB C203S (geranyl-geranylation deficient) for 24 h. The DR5-DISC was captured 3 h after the addition of AMG 655-conjugated beads to cells. Co-immunoprecipitation of FLAG-RALB was assessed and pull-down of DR5 was confirmed using WB analysis. Protein expression for FLAG in the unbound fraction was also analysed. Densitometry was performed on the DR5-DISC bound FLAG-RALB blot using ImageJ software and the results (intensity values) are denoted below the blot. Nd = not detected. Bottom: Apoptosis in the unbound fraction was determined using a Caspase-3/7 activity assay. F HCT116 cells were transiently transfected with EV or FLAG-RALB WT for 24 h, followed by treatment with rhTRAIL for 3 h. Expression of PARP, cleaved Caspase-3, FLAG-tag and DR5 was determined by WB (top). Apoptosis was determined using a Caspase-3/7 activity assay (bottom).

To investigate further if RALB plasma membrane localisation and/or its GDP/GTP-bound state was required for its recruitment to the DR5-DISC in response to AMG 655 treatment, we used FLAG-tagged WT, constitutively-active (G23V), dominant-negative (S28N) and geranylgeranylation-deficient (C203S) MT RALB expression constructs (Fig. 6E). RALB C203S does not undergo geranylgeranylation at its C-terminal domain and is localised in the cytosol fraction47. Binding of RALB to the DR5-DISC was attenuated by the C203S-MT but not the S28N-MT, when compared to WT-RALB in AMG 655-treated cells (Fig. 6E). Interestingly, a decreased association of G23V-RALB with the DR5-DISC was observed compared to WT or S28N-RALB, suggesting that constitutively active RALB has a higher turnover rate and may be removed from the plasma membrane more rapidly, compared to WT-RALB. Notably, transient overexpression of WT-RALB attenuated TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HCT116 CRC cells (Fig. 6F). AMG 655-induced apoptosis was unaffected and slightly increased following transient overexpression of G23V-RALB, S28N-RALB and C203S-RALB MT expression constructs, respectively (Fig. 6E, lower panel). Taken together, these results are the first to our knowledge to demonstrate the importance of RALB in regulating sensitivity to TRAIL treatment in KRASMT CRC.

Discussion

Identification of novel therapeutic strategies that can induce effective KRASMT-tumour-cell killing remains an unmet need1. So far, all attempts to interfere with oncogenic RAS signalling have failed in the clinic. In particular, combinations of inhibitors of the MAPK and PI3K/Akt RAS effector signalling have been shown to be ineffective in KRASMT CRC4, suggesting the involvement of additional effector pathways in mediating KRAS oncogenic signalling. In this study, we provide evidence that the RALB-GTPase is an important regulator of RASMT cancer cell survival and that inhibition of RALB ‘primes’ KRASMT cells to death upon stimulation with DR5-agonistic antibodies.

Previous studies have shown that RAL-GEF pathway activation is one of the basic requirements for RAS-mediated transformation of human epithelial cells7,8 and that RALA and RALB have both distinct and/or overlapping roles in regulating migration/invasion and anchorage-independent growth in pancreatic, bladder and prostate cancer11,48. In agreement with a previous study in a range of cancer cell models49, we found that RALB, and not RALA, has a profound effect on the survival and apoptosis of CRC cells, in particular in KRASMT CRC. Contrary to a previous study from Martin et al.50, our study showed that overexpression of RALB markedly increased the colony-forming ability of KRASMT CRC cells. Our previous studies and those of others have shown that MEK1/2 inhibition is relatively ineffective at inducing apoptosis in KRASMT CRC cells15. An important finding of our study is that neither the RALB nor the RALA RAS effector pathways are involved in regulating resistance to MEK1/2 inhibition in KRASMT CRC. Taken together, we demonstrate here for the first time a key role for RALB as a regulator of survival in KRASMT CRC.

High RALB expression has been reported in several tumours, including lung cancer, and has been identified as a poor prognostic marker in these tumours51. In this study, we found that RALB was overexpressed in CRC tissues compared to matched normal colon tissue, highlighting the potential for exploitation of RALB as a therapeutic target in CRC. Stage II/III CRC patients with high RALB expression trended towards poorer overall survival but the data were not statistically significant. Importantly, further analysis revealed that the highest levels of RALB are detected in CRIS-B CRC, the subgroup that is characterised by invasive, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition features and strong TGF-β activity, which is associated with a worse outcome13. Previous studies have also shown a positive correlation between RALB and an invasive, aggressive and metastatic phenotype in bladder and pancreatic cancer10,52. These results would indicate that anti-RALB selective therapies may provide an effective therapeutic approach for KRASMT CRIS-B CRC with high expression levels of RALB.

Several studies have shown that downregulation of RALB results in apoptosis and increased drug sensitivity through de-phosphorylation of TBK1, resulting in decreased expression of NF-κB target pro-survival genes (e.g. Bcl-2)53,54. In contrast to these studies, our data did not show a role for TBK1 in mediating siRALB-induced apoptosis (Fig. S6E). However, the mechanism by which RALB silencing induces apoptosis was shown to involve Caspase-8-dependent apoptosis following upregulation of cell surface and total DR5 levels. This is the first demonstration of a link between RALB and DR5 expression. Moreover, using receptor-specific siRNA and a DR5 CRISPR knockout model, we further found that induction of apoptosis following siRALB was mediated by DR5, but not DR4.

It was previously shown that DR5 cell-surface levels are a critical mediator to TRAIL-induced apoptosis46,55. Consistent with this newly identified association between RALB and DR5, we have shown that inhibition of RALB through specific siRNA or the broad spectrum cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Dinaciclib significantly sensitised KRASMT CRC cells to TRAIL treatment. We also found that transiently overexpressing RALB decreased DR5 levels and apoptosis in response to TRAIL treatment. Of note, this is also the first study showing that stimulation of DR5 results in a rapid and Caspase-8-dependent association of RALB with the DR5-DISC, which only occurred when RALB was able to translocate to the plasma membrane. Several clinical trials using fully human DR5-agonistic antibodies, including AMG 655, have been unable to show meaningful clinical efficacy56, suggesting inherent resistance of primary tumours to DR5 activation-induced apoptosis. Our finding indicates a novel and effective way to enhance DR5 activation-induced apoptosis, in particular for KRASMT CRC.

Given its potential role in resistance to DR5-agonistic agents, we further investigated how DR5 expression levels are regulated by RALB. This is the first study showing that RALB regulates DR5 protein levels through the lysosomal degradation pathway. A number of reports have shown that DR5 levels are controlled by the lysosomal, but not the proteasomal degradation pathway42,57. Additional studies have shown that DR5 co-localises and interacts with LC3-II in autophagosomes, in particular in TRAIL-resistant cells55. These reports show that lysosomal inhibition increases cell-surface DR5 levels, as knockdown of RALB did in our study (Fig. 3A, B). Using transient overexpression of RALB, we found that DR5 co-localises with lysosomes in KRASMT CRC cells. These results would indicate that anti-RALB selective therapies may suppress DR5 lysosomal degradation, increasing cell membrane DR5 levels and thereby augmenting sensitivity to DR5-agonistic antibodies.

In conclusion, we have shown that RALB inhibition regulates DR5 dynamics and induces apoptotic priming, and that targeting this apoptotic vulnerability with selective DR5-agonistic antibodies may be a promising strategy to improve treatment response in KRASMT CRC tumours. Furthermore, the study has uncovered a novel RALB-DR5-DISC complex with RALB overexpression suppressing TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Importantly, RALB is highly expressed in the poor prognostic CRIS-B CRC subgroup. From a clinical perspective, our data provides the preclinical rationale for the initiation of a phase I study of RALB inhibition with novel multivalent TRAIL receptor 2/DR5 agonists (eg. MEDI3039)58,59 in KRASMT CRIS-B CRC with high expression levels of RALB. Our findings also support the development of new and specific anti-RALB molecules that may provide tools to investigate the biology and therapeutic potential of RALB in CRC as they become available21.

References

  1. 1.

    Peeters, M. et al. Analysis of KRAS/NRAS mutations in a Phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFIRI compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 5469–5479 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Maughan, T. S. et al. Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet 377, 2103–2114 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hunter, J. C. et al. Biochemical and structural analysis of common cancer-associated KRAS mutations. Mol. Cancer Res. 13, 1325–1335 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tolcher, A. W. et al. Antitumor activity in RAS-driven tumors by blocking AKT and MEK. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 739–748 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cox, A. D., Der, C. J. & Philips, M. R. Targeting RAS membrane association: back to the future for anti-RAS drug discovery? Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 1819–1827 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bodemann, B. O. & White, M. A. Ral GTPases and cancer: linchpin support of the tumorigenic platform. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 133–140 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hamad, N. M. et al. Distinct requirements for Ras oncogenesis in human versus mouse cells. Genes Dev. 16, 2045–2057 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rangarajan, A., Hong, S. J., Gifford, A. & Weinberg, R. A. Species- and cell type-specific requirements for cellular transformation. Cancer Cell. 6, 171–183 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Peschard, P. et al. Genetic deletion of RALA and RALB small GTPases reveals redundant functions in development and tumorigenesis. Curr. Biol. 22, 2063–2068 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lim, K. H. et al. Divergent roles for RalA and RalB in malignant growth of human pancreatic carcinoma cells. Curr. Biol. 16, 2385–2394 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Oxford, G. et al. RalA and RalB: antagonistic relatives in cancer cell migration. Cancer Res. 65, 7111–7120 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yin, J. et al. Activation of the RalGEF/Ral pathway promotes prostate cancer metastasis to bone. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 7538–7550 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Isella, C. et al. Selective analysis of cancer-cell intrinsic transcriptional traits defines novel clinically relevant subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat. Commun. 8, 15107 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Han, J. H. et al. Potentiation of TRAIL killing activity by multimerization through isoleucine zipper hexamerization motif. BMB Rep. 49, 282–287 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Van Schaeybroeck, S. et al. ADAM17-dependent c-MET-STAT3 signaling mediates resistance to MEK inhibitors in KRAS mutant colorectal cancer. Cell Rep. 7, 1940–1955 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Carson, R. et al. HDAC inhibition overcomes acute resistance to MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer by downregulation of c-FLIPL. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 3230–3240 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Montagut, C. et al. Identification of a mutation in the extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor conferring cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 18, 221–223 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lamba, S. et al. RAF suppression synergizes with MEK inhibition in KRAS mutant cancer cells. Cell Rep. 8, 1475–1483 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Paek, A. L., Liu, J. C., Loewer, A., Forrester, W. C. & Lahav, G. Cell-to-cell variation in p53 dynamics leads to fractional killing. Cell 165, 631–642 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Majkut, J. et al. Differential affinity of FLIP and procaspase 8 for FADD’s DED binding surfaces regulates DISC assembly. Nat. Commun. 5, 3350 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yan, C. et al. Discovery and characterization of small molecules that target the GTPase Ral. Nature 515, 443–447 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Van Schaeybroeck, S. et al. Chemotherapy-induced epidermal growth factor receptor activation determines response to combined gefitinib/chemotherapy treatment in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 5, 1154–1165 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Abrisch, R. G., Gumbin, S. C., Wisniewski, B. T., Lackner, L. L. & Voeltz, G. K. Fission and fusion machineries converge at ER contact sites to regulate mitochondrial morphology. J. Cell Biol. 219, (2020).

  24. 24.

    Allen, W. L. et al. Transcriptional subtyping and CD8 immunohistochemistry identifies poor prognosis stage II/III colorectal cancer patients who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. JCO Precision Oncology. 2018, 1–15 (2018).

  25. 25.

    Marisa, L. et al. Gene expression classification of colon cancer into molecular subtypes: characterization, validation, and prognostic value. PLoS Med. 10, e1001453 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jorissen, R. N. et al. Metastasis-associated gene expression changes predict poor outcomes in patients with Dukes Stage B and C colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 7642–7651 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Roumeliotis, T. I. et al. Genomic determinants of protein abundance variation in colorectal cancer cells. Cell Rep. 20, 2201–2214 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dunne, P. D. et al. EphA2 expression Is a key driver of migration and invasion and a poor prognostic marker in colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 230–242 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gentry, L. R., Martin, T. D., Reiner, D. J. & Der, C. J. Ral small GTPase signaling and oncogenesis: more than just 15 min of fame. Biochim. biophys. Acta 1843, 2976–2988 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Samatar, A. A. & Poulikakos, P. I. Targeting RAS-ERK signalling in cancer: promises and challenges. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13, 928–942 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Adjei, A. A. et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral, small-molecule mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in patients with advanced cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 2139–2146 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pomeroy, E. J. et al. Ras oncogene-independent activation of RALB signaling is a targetable mechanism of escape from NRAS(V12) oncogene addiction in acute myeloid leukemia. Oncogene 36, 3263–3273 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tecleab, A., Zhang, X. & Sebti, S. M. Ral GTPase down-regulation stabilizes and reactivates p53 to inhibit malignant transformation. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 31296–31309 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wilson, T. R. et al. Combined inhibition of FLIP and XIAP induces Bax-independent apoptosis in type II colorectal cancer cells. Oncogene 28, 63–72 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lam, M., Marsters, S. A., Ashkenazi, A. & Walter, P. Misfolded proteins bind and activate death receptor 5 to trigger apoptosis during unresolved endoplasmic reticulum stress. eLife 9, (2020).

  36. 36.

    Falschlehner, C., Ganten, T. M., Koschny, R., Schaefer, U. & Walczak, H. TRAIL and other TRAIL receptor agonists as novel cancer therapeutics. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 647, 195–206 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Takimoto, R. & El-Deiry, W. S. Wild-type p53 transactivates the KILLER/DR5 gene through an intronic sequence-specific DNA-binding site. Oncogene 19, 1735–1743 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Son, Y. G. et al. Silibinin sensitizes human glioma cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis via DR5 up-regulation and down-regulation of c-FLIP and survivin. Cancer Res. 67, 8274–8284 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shetty, S. et al. Transcription factor NF-kappaB differentially regulates death receptor 5 expression involving histone deacetylase 1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 5404–5416 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bodemann, B. O. et al. RalB and the exocyst mediate the cellular starvation response by direct activation of autophagosome assembly. Cell 144, 253–267 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Akazawa, Y. et al. Death receptor 5 internalization is required for lysosomal permeabilization by TRAIL in malignant liver cell lines. Gastroenterology 136, 2365–2376. e2361–2367 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Park, E. J. et al. Chloroquine enhances TRAIL-mediated apoptosis through up-regulation of DR5 by stabilization of mRNA and protein in cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 22921 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mauvezin, C. & Neufeld, T. P. Bafilomycin A1 disrupts autophagic flux by inhibiting both V-ATPase-dependent acidification and Ca-P60A/SERCA-dependent autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Autophagy 11, 1437–1438 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Zhang, Y. & Zhang, B. TRAIL resistance of breast cancer cells is associated with constitutive endocytosis of death receptors 4 and 5. Mol. cancer Res. 6, 1861–1871 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zhou, L., Wang, W., Dicker, D. T., Humphreys, R. C. & El-Deiry, W. S. Prediction of proapoptotic anticancer therapeutic response in vivo based on cell death visualization and TRAIL death ligand-receptor interaction. Cancer Biol. Ther. 12, 335–348 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Austin, C. D. et al. Death-receptor activation halts clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10283–10288 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Matsubara, K., Hinoi, T., Koyama, S. & Kikuchi, A. The post-translational modifications of Ral and Rac1 are important for the action of Ral-binding protein 1, a putative effector protein of Ral. FEBS Lett. 410, 169–174 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lim, K. H. et al. Activation of RalA is critical for Ras-induced tumorigenesis of human cells. Cancer Cell 7, 533–545 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Chien, Y. et al. RalB GTPase-mediated activation of the IkappaB family kinase TBK1 couples innate immune signaling to tumor cell survival. Cell 127, 157–170 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Martin, T. D., Samuel, J. C., Routh, E. D., Der, C. J. & Yeh, J. J. Activation and involvement of Ral GTPases in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 71, 206–215 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Guin, S. et al. Contributions of KRAS and RAL in non-small-cell lung cancer growth and progression. J. Thorac. Oncol. 8, 1492–1501 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Smith, S. C., Baras, A. S., Owens, C. R., Dancik, G. & Theodorescu, D. Transcriptional signatures of Ral GTPase are associated with aggressive clinicopathologic characteristics in human cancer. Cancer Res. 72, 3480–3491 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Eckfeldt, C. E. et al. RALB provides critical survival signals downstream of Ras in acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotarget 7, 65147–65156 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Seguin, L. et al. An integrin beta(3)-KRAS-RalB complex drives tumour stemness and resistance to EGFR inhibition. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 457–468 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Di, X. et al. Accumulation of autophagosomes in breast cancer cells induces TRAIL resistance through downregulation of surface expression of death receptors 4 and 5. Oncotarget 4, 1349–1364 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kindler, H. L. et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of ganitumab (AMG 479) or conatumumab (AMG 655) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann. Oncol. 23, 2834–2842 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Shin, G. C., Kang, H. S., Lee, A. R. & Kim, K. H. Hepatitis B virus-triggered autophagy targets TNFRSF10B/death receptor 5 for degradation to limit TNFSF10/TRAIL response. Autophagy 12, 2451–2466 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Swers, J. S. et al. Multivalent scaffold proteins as superagonists of TRAIL receptor 2-induced apoptosis. Mol. Cancer Ther. 12, 1235–1244 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Greer, Y. E. et al. MEDI3039, a novel highly potent tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor 2 agonist, causes regression of orthotopic tumors and inhibits outgrowth of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 21, 27 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Galit Lahav (Harvard Medical School) for the HCT116 Caspase-8 paired wild-type and null cell lines, and Amgen for supplying AMG 655. We thank Professors Henning Walczak (UCL Cancer Institute London), Gregory Gores (College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester) and Dan Theodorescu (Denver University, Colorado) for supplying the iz-TRAIL expression plasmid, the GFP-DR5 plasmid, and the wild-type and constitutively active RALB plasmids respectively. Funding was supported by Cancer Research UK (C212/A13721) and by MErCuRIC, funded by the European Commission’s Framework Programme 7, under contract #602901. A. Campbell and O. J. Sansom were supported by Cancer Research UK (A17196 and A21139).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Van Schaeybroeck.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Edited by J.-E. Ricci

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khawaja, H., Campbell, A., Roberts, J.Z. et al. RALB GTPase: a critical regulator of DR5 expression and TRAIL sensitivity in KRAS mutant colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis 11, 930 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-03131-3

Download citation

Search

Quick links