Partners in crime: POPX2 phosphatase and its interacting proteins in cancer

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation govern intracellular signal transduction and cellular functions. Kinases and phosphatases are involved in the regulation and development of many diseases such as Alzheimer’s, diabetes, and cancer. While the functions and roles of many kinases, as well as their substrates, are well understood, phosphatases are comparatively less well studied. Recent studies have shown that rather than acting on fewer and more distinct substrates like the kinases, phosphatases can recognize specific phosphorylation sites on many different proteins, making the study of phosphatases and their substrates challenging. One approach to understand the biological functions of phosphatases is through understanding their protein–protein interaction network. POPX2 (Partner of PIX 2; also known as PPM1F or CaMKP) is a serine/threonine phosphatase that belongs to the PP2C family. It has been implicated in cancer cell motility and invasiveness. This review aims to summarize the different binding partners of POPX2 phosphatase and explore the various functions of POPX2 through its interactome in the cell. In particular, we focus on the impact of POPX2 on cancer progression. Acting via its different substrates and interacting proteins, POPX2’s involvement in metastasis is multifaceted and varied according to the stages of metastasis.

Facts

  • POPX2/PPM1F/CaMKP phosphatase has multiple and seemingly opposite roles at different stages of metastasis.

  • High POPX2 levels and activity are associated with increased motility and invasiveness of the cancer cells. Low levels and activity favor angiogenesis and establishment of metastatic colonies.

  • Similar to other phosphatases, many substrates and interacting proteins of POPX2 have been reported.

Open questions

  • How can POPX2 levels and activity be regulated at different stages of tumorigenesis?

  • Is there a switch or switches to control the levels and activity of POPX2 at different phases of tumor development?

  • Can we understand the physiological roles of POPX2 or any other protein through exploring its interactome?

Introduction

Phosphorylation is a posttranslational modification that can modulate the function, subcellular localization, complex formation, and degradation of a protein1. Phosphorylation often results in conformational changes of the proteins leading to alterations in their catalytic activities or binding to other proteins. It is a reversible process catalyzed by kinases and phosphatases. Phosphatases specific for dephosphorylating serine/threonine are encoded by two gene families, phosphoprotein phosphatase (PPP) and protein phosphatase Mg2+/Mn2+-dependent (PPM)2,3. PP1, PP2A, and PP2B belong to the PPP family, while PP2C (also known as PPM1) and pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase belong to the PPM family. The PPP phosphatases form complexes with other regulatory subunits, whereas the PPM phosphatases exist as monomers and require divalent cations such as Mg2+ or Mn2+ for activation. The PPM family is insensitive to inhibition by okadaic acid and calyculin A4,5. In human, the PPM1 family comprises 12 phosphatases. They are ubiquitously expressed except PPM1E and PPM1J, which are enriched in brain and testis.

Here, we focus on the PPM1F phosphatase, also known as CaMK phosphatase (CaMKP) or partner of PIX 2 (POPX2), henceforth referred to as POPX2. POPX2 was first discovered in rat brain extract as a dephosphorylation activity against a phospho-peptide containing the Thr286 auto-phosphorylation site of Ca2+/calmodulin kinase II (CaMKII)6; subsequently, it was found to interact with βPIX and hence was named partner of PIX (POPX)7. Partner of PIX 1 (POPX1) and POPX2 are two isoforms of POPX. They share 66% similarity over their core phosphatase domains (Fig. 1). POPX2 localizes in the cytoplasm whereas POPX1 is mainly found in the nucleus7,8. The regulation of POPX2 expression and activity by miRNAs has been covered by another review9. Here, we attempt to explore the physiological functions of POPX2 through its interactome. In particular, we will focus on POPX2, its partners and their involvement in signaling pathways related to cancer metastasis.

Fig. 1: Schematic illustrations of PP2Cα, POPX1, and POPX2.
figure1

Schematic drawings of the PPM1 phosphatases. POPX1 and POPX2 share high similarity with other PP2C family proteins. The yellow region indicates the PP2C phosphatase catalytic domain and the black bars represent the similarity regions between proteins. The purple region indicates the region of homology between POPX1 and POPX2. The numbers to the right refer to the number of amino acid residues in each protein.

Exploring the functions of POPX2 through its interactome

Protein–protein interactions can lead to assembly of transient or stable complexes that participate in signaling pathways10. Studying the interactome of POPX2 is a useful starting point to explore its cellular functions. Protein interactome can be identified and deduced from immunoprecipitation or pulldown assays, yeast two-hybrid or other similar methods, as well as dry lab approaches and analyses of amino acid sequences, conservation of protein domains throughout evolution and from protein structure-based data11. Thus far, POPX2 has been implicated in actin cytoskeleton maintenance, cell motility and invasiveness, angiogenesis, kinesin motor transport, and regulation of apoptosis7,12,13,14,15,16. However, not all underlying mechanisms are well understood. In this review, we highlight a number of POPX2 interacting partners identified to date to elucidate the functions of POPX2 in the cells. Since the levels of POPX2 is positively correlated to the motility and invasiveness of the cancer cells14, specific emphasis is on understanding the roles of POPX2 in cell migration and metastasis.

The binding partners of POPX2

Table 1 summarizes known binding partners of POPX2, their cellular roles, and signaling pathways which they are implicated6,7,12,15,17,18,19,20,21,22,23. The major functions regulated by POPX2 and its binding partners are further discussed below.

Table 1 Binding partners of POPX2 and related signaling pathways.

Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and cell motility

Rho GTPases are involved in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, which in turn impacts on cell shapes and migration24,25,26. The small GTPases act as molecular switches, which become activated once they are GTP-bound. Many effectors of the Rho GTPases are kinases (e.g., PAK, Rho-associated kinase (ROCK), etc.) and proteins (e.g., mDia1, WASP, etc.), which directly or indirectly influence actin cytoskeleton remodeling in the cells27. RhoA, Cdc42, and Rac1 are most well studied amongst the Rho family members. Activated RhoA is associated with increased formation of actin stress fibers28, whereas Cdc42 and Rac1 are known to stimulate filopodia and lamellipodia formation, respectively29,30. All three GTPases are required for the regulation of cell migration, which involves modulation of actin polymerization and focal adhesion turnover. POPX2 has been found to interact with the effectors and regulators of Rho GTPases.

βPIX/PAK

POPX2 was identified as a βPIX interacting protein through a yeast two-hybrid screen7. βPIX is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, which activates Cdc42 and Rac131. POPX2 interacts with βPIX and forms a trimeric complex with βPIX and PAK1. Although βPIX is not a reported substrate of POPX2, POPX2 can dephosphorylate PAK and downregulate its kinase activity. This is an interesting example where an activator and an effector of a Rho GTPase, as well as the negative regulator of the effector are found in the same complex. Active PAK1 induces stress fiber loss and disassembly of focal adhesions32. POPX2 overexpression can rescue the loss of stress fibers induced by active PAK1 and dominant negative Cdc427. These observations suggest possible involvement of POPX2 in PAK1 and Cdc42-mediated actin cytoskeleton remodeling. In addition, it has been found that POPX2 could affect the phosphorylation status of myosin light chain (MLC). Silencing POPX2 in MDA-MB-231 cells results in reduced phospho-MLC233. Phosphorylation of MLC by Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) and myosin light chain kinase regulates the activity of myosin II and hence actin–myosin interaction for stress fiber formation and cell contractility34,35. Although MLC is not a substrate of POPX233, the phosphatase appears to be able to regulate the stress fibers via a MLC-related mechanism.

mDia1

Interestingly, POPX2 also interacts with mDia1, another effector protein of Rho GTPases17. mDia1 belongs to the diaphanous family of formins, which catalyzes actin polymerization at the barbed ends of the growing filaments. ROCK and mDia1 are effectors downstream of RhoA that are responsible for the regulation of stress fibers. mDia1 adopts a closed conformation through head-to-tail interaction. This auto-inhibited state can be relieved by binding to active RhoA36,37. Expression of a dominant negative form of mDia1, which includes its FH3 domain, leads to breakdown of stress fibers. It has been found that POPX2 interacts with the FH3 domain of mDia1, and overexpression of POPX2 can prevent the loss of stress fibers induced by dominant negative mDia117. Since mDia1 is further implicated in the regulation of serum-response factor (SRF)-mediated transcription, the interaction of POPX2 with mDia1 also impacts transcription mediated by SRF and the transcription co-activator MAL. Although POPX2 interacts with mDia1, it is not clear if mDia1 is a direct substrate of POPX2.

Overexpression of POPX2 leads to robust stress fiber formation and silencing POPX2 results in loss of stress fibers in the cells7. These observations and the links between POPX2, PAK, and mDia1 suggest that POPX2 does play a role in stress fiber maintenance which is, in turn, an interplay of activities downstream of Cdc42/Rac1 and RhoA.

Cell–cell adhesion and cell polarity

Through its interaction with kinesin KIF3 motor complex, POPX2 can affect cell–cell adhesion and cell polarity by inhibiting proper trafficking of cargoes. Known cargoes of the KIF3 motor include N-cadherins, adenomatous polyposis coli, β-catenin, Par-3, fodrin, and Rab11-containing vesicles38,39,40,41,42,43.

Kinesin KIF3A

The interaction of POPX2 with the kinesin-2 family motor KIF3A/B complex is an interesting discovery19. The KIF3 kinesin motor is a trimeric complex consisting of KIF3A, KIF3B motor subunits and KAP3, the non-motor subunit responsible for cargo binding. POPX2 was first discovered to interact with KAP3 from a yeast two-hybrid screen. Later, KIF3A was also found to interact with POPX2 in overexpression/co-immunoprecipitation experiments. In addition, POPX2 is able to dephosphorylate Ser690 at the C-terminal of KIF3A and affects the trafficking of the motor protein along microtubules. It is proposed that KIF3A adopts an auto-inhibited conformation through head-to-tail interaction when Ser690 is dephosphorylated. As a result, transport of N-cadherin and β-catenin to the cell periphery is impaired in cells overexpressing POPX2, leading to the loss of proper cell–cell contact. Phosphorylation of KIF3A Ser690 by kinases such as CaMKII results in its release from the auto-inhibited state (Fig. 2)19,44. It is interesting to note that CaMKII is dephosphorylated by POPX2. Therefore, the effects of POPX2 on KIF3A could also be mediated through the inactivation of CaMKII by POPX2.

Fig. 2: Schematic illustration of KIF3A-mediated cargo delivery in control and POPX2 overexpressing cells.
figure2

KIF3A motor protein is phosphorylated at Ser690 by CaMKII, leading to an open conformation and active motor. Active kinesin-2 motor complex delivers N-cadherin and Par-3 to the cell surface by trafficking along the microtubules. POPX2 dephosphorylates KIF3A at Ser690 and induces a closed and auto-inhibited conformation. In addition, POPX2 also dephosphorylates and inhibits CaMKII. Therefore, POPX2 overexpressing cells have impaired N-cadherin and Par-3 transport to the cell periphery leading to loss of cell–cell adhesion and cell polarity.

In addition to its influence on cell–cell adhesion, POPX2 also regulates cell polarity20. Cell polarity is essential for directional migration, differentiation of stem cells, wound healing, and immune response. In migrating fibroblasts, the centrosomes are normally positioned between the leading edges and the nuclei. The nuclear–centrosomal axis and centrosome placement are impaired in POPX2 overexpressing cells thus affecting directional migration. This is most likely due to the loss of proper Par-3 and N-cadherin localization in POPX2 overexpressing cells. Par-3 and N-cadherin are cell polarity regulators that are delivered by kinesin-2 motor to their targeted locations in the cells45,46,47. Defects in Par-3 and N-cadherin transport lead to perturbation of centrosome placement and cell polarity45.

Cell signaling

Calcium calmodulin kinases (CaMKs)

POPX2(CaMKP) was first identified and purified as a phosphatase, which dephosphorylated CaMKII in rat brain extract6. In the same study, it was found that POPX2 was insensitive to 10-μM okadaic acid and 100-nM calyculin A, two inhibitors which inhibit PP2A and PP1 phosphatases. In addition, POPX2 requires Mn2+ but not Mg2+ for its activation. Besides CaMKII, POPX2 can also dephosphorylate other CaMKs such as CaMKI and CaMKIV48. Using transfected constructs of POPX1/2 homologs from the zebrafish, it has been shown that the phosphatases are capable of dephosphorylating CaMKI in living cells49. Since CaMKII is abundant in the brain and controls major neuronal functions, it is expected that POPX2 influences neuronal activities through its regulation of CaMKII. CaMKII is also important for calcium homeostasis50. Interestingly, CaMKII has been found to promote breast cancer cell migration, invasion, and anchorage independent growth51. CaMKII has also been shown to regulate the cell cycle52, which implicates the kinase in the modulation of cell division and proliferation. It is not immediately clear if POPX2 is involved in the regulation of CaMKII in these contexts.

Members of the Hippo signaling pathway

The Hippo pathway is important in controlling organ sizes in animals, and has also been implicated in cancer development53. This pathway mainly functions to restrain cell proliferation and promote apoptosis. Cancer cells carrying mutated members of the Hippo pathway acquire anoikis resistance and anchorage independency. The core of the Hippo pathway is made up of a scaffold protein, MOB1, and a kinase cassette consisting of MST1/2 and LATS1/2 kinases. MST phosphorylates LATS and subsequently, active LATS phosphorylates the transcription co-activators, YAP/TAZ54,55. Phosphorylated YAP/TAZ then gets sequestered in the cytoplasm via binding to proteins such as 14-3-3 or gets degraded. Non-phosphorylated YAP/TAZ can translocate to the nucleus and interact with transcription factor, TEAD to induce gene expression56. Additional kinases such as NDR1/2 have also been found to phosphorylate YAP/TAZ57. POPX2 participates in the regulation of the Hippo pathway through binding to core kinases including MST1, LATS1, and NDR1. The interaction between POPX2 and members of the Hippo pathway was first discovered in a POPX2 pulldown/mass-spectrometry study. Later, it was found that POPX2 negatively regulates the activity of LATS1 through dephosphorylating Thr107912. Therefore, cells without POPX2 display higher phosphorylated LATS1 levels and decreased TAZ-target gene expression (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3: Regulation of the Hippo pathway by POPX2.
figure3

POPX2 dephosphorylates LATS1 at Thr1079 and negatively regulates the activity of LATS1. In wild-type (WT) cells, dephosphorylation and inactivation of LATS1 result in translocation of YAP/TAZ to the nucleus to induce TEAD-mediated gene transcription. On the other hand, POPX2-knockout (KO) cells show high levels of phospho-LATS1, leading to the phosphorylation of YAP/TAZ. Phosphorylated YAP/TAZ are targeted for degradation in the cytoplasm. As a result, there is decreased TEAD-mediated transcription.

Cellular metabolism

5′-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)

5′-Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) consists of α, β, and γ subunits and acts as an energy sensor to regulate cellular energy metabolism through glycogenesis and fatty acid synthesis58. AMPK is activated through the binding of AMP to the γ subunit, leading to phosphorylation of Thr172 by liver kinase B159. The interaction between AMPK and POPX1/2 was detected by immunoprecipitation approaches18. Depletion of POPX1 and 2 resulted in increased AMPK-Thr172 phosphorylation in HEK293 cells. As activation of AMPK results in reduced glucose production and increased glucose utilization, AMPK has been implicated as a therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes60. Therefore, inhibition of POPX1/2 might contribute to type 2 diabetes treatment through activation of AMPK. Recent studies have suggested AMPK as a metabolic tumor suppressor61. AMPK is reported to be upstream of mammalian target of rapamycin, cyclooxygenase-2, and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), which are associated with cell proliferation, inflammation, and antioxidant response62. NRF2 is an antioxidant transcription factor that is phosphorylated by AMPK62. Phospho-NRF2 translocates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, leading to increased antioxidant response element (ARE) gene expression during oxidative stress63,64,65. Although there is no clear evidence showing a direct role for POPX2 in NRF2 activation or phosphorylation status, it is possible that POPX2 activity is inhibited under oxidative conditions, leading to AMPK activation and nuclear accumulation of NRF2 for ARE-mediated gene expression.

Regulation of apoptosis

TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1)

TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) is important in the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity66. It is also a strong pro-survival regulator. TAK1 is activated by cytokines such as interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor67. The activation of TAK1 requires its interacting protein TAB1 (TAK1-binding protein 1) and TAB2 or TAB368,69,70. It is well known that TAK1 activates the IKK-NF-κB pathway71,72, which is activated in response to genotoxic stress and mediates the balance between anti- and pro-apoptotic gene expression. Binding of TAB1 to the kinase domain of TAK1 promotes auto-phosphorylation of TAK1 at Thr187 in the activation loop69,73. Activated TAK1 then phosphorylates IKK causing the release of NF-κB from IκB, leading to NF-κB nuclear translocation thus promoting the expression of antiapoptotic genes74,75. TAB1-TAK1 complex is discovered as a binding partner of POPX2 in a FLAG-POPX2 pulldown-mass-spectrometry experiment15. Endogenous interaction has been verified by co-immunoprecipitation using whole-cell lysates. POPX2 is found to be able to dephosphorylate TAK1-Thr187 and inactivate TAK1, suggesting that POPX2 can regulate apoptotic gene expression through the modulation of NF-κB activity. It has been shown that in POPX2-knockdown cells, there was increased TAK1 activity and upregulated antiapoptotic gene expression. Therefore, in response to DNA damaging agents, cells with lower POPX2 levels demonstrate higher cell viability possibly through the regulation of the TAK1-IKK-NF-κB pathway (Fig. 4)15. An earlier study found that POPX2 showed significant sequence homology and having functional similarity with the FEM-2 gene involved in sex determination in C. elegans76. The same study reported that overexpression of POPX2 leds to increased apoptosis in HeLa cells, suggesting that POPX2 might be involved in apoptosis regulation and signaling although the mechanism was not known.

Fig. 4: The role of POPX2 in DNA damage response.
figure4

DNA damage stimulates activation and translocation of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase to the cytosol to initiate DNA damage response. TNF-receptor associated factor (TRAF) forms a complex with TAK1 and its binding proteins TAB1/2/3. Active TAK1 phosphorylates the IKK complex, leading to translocation of NF-κB from the cytosol to the nucleus. This results in the upregulation of NF-κB-mediated antiapoptotic gene expression. In the presence of high levels of POPX2, TAK1 is negatively regulated and its downstream effect is inhibited.

Cell-cycle regulation

Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1)

Through a combination of bioinformatics and mass-spectrometry approaches, checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) has been identified and verified as a POPX2 interacting protein. Additional co-immunoprecipitation studies of whole-cell lysates further validated the presence of endogenous Chk1-POPX2 complex in the cells. Chk1 is also a potential substrate of POPX223. Chk1 is a serine/threonine kinase involved in cell-cycle regulation. It is crucial for the initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint and impacts on S, G2/M, and M phases of the cell cycle77,78,79. When treated with an etoposide (VP-16), which induces DNA damage, cells expressing high levels of POPX2 accumulate at S phase of the cell cycle. This observation suggests that POPX2 might dephosphorylate Chk1 and inhibit its kinase activity leading to impairment of Chk1-activated G1-S checkpoint, allowing cells to transit from G1 to S phase instead of arresting at G1/S transition23.

The implication of POPX2 in cancer progression

Studies so far have implicated POPX2 in a myriad of signaling pathways and cellular processes including stress fiber maintenance, cargo trafficking via the kinesin motor, apoptosis, glucose metabolism, cell migration, anchorage-dependent growth, and DNA damage response7,12,14,15,17,18,19,20,23,38,80. Dysregulation of POPX2 will likely lead to development of diseases where these cellular processes and pathways are crucial. POPX2 level is positively correlated to invasiveness of breast cancers14. As documented in Oncomine database81, higher POPX2 levels are found in triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) compared to non-TNBCs. POPX2 is also found to enhance cell motility and invasion14. Short-term metastasis studies using nude mouse metastasis model found that compared with control MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, POPX2-knockdown MDA-MB-231 cells did not colonize and attach well in the lungs, 4 h after tail vein injection14. Interestingly, paradoxical results were obtained in longer term metastasis studies using the same model. Although high POPX2 levels were linked to higher cell motility and invasiveness, bigger and more numerous tumor nodules were found in the lungs of nude mice injected with POPX2-knockdown breast cancer cells 8 weeks after injection16. It was later confirmed that the secretome of POPX2-knockdown cells contained higher levels of pro-angiogenic factors including cytokines, growth factors, and exosomes. This may explain the bigger tumor nodules formed by the POPX2-knockdown cells.

Cancer metastasis is a complex process containing many stages. It begins with epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), dissemination, and intravasation followed by circulation, extravasation, and colonization82. POPX2 might perform different roles at different stages of metastasis. In the following sections, we summarize the implications of POPX2’s involvement at different stages of cancer progression, taking into consideration the various interacting partners of POPX2.

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) (dissemination and migration)

During the process of EMT, tumor cells lose cell adhesion, polarity, and epithelial properties. In the meantime, they acquire migratory and invasive characteristics of mesenchymal cells that enable them to invade into the basement membrane83. The proteases that are secreted by the invasive cells degrade the basement membrane and extracellular matrix (ECM), allowing the cells to invade into neighboring tissues.

The screening of POPX2 expression in different breast cancer cell lines found that the level of POPX2 is high in invasive lines such as MDA-MB-231, whereas noninvasive cell lines such as MCF-7 have low POPX2 levels. Depletion of POPX2 in MDA-MB-231 cells significantly reduces cell motility and invasiveness14,80, whereas overexpression of POPX2 results in increased cell motility13. POPX2 could regulate cell motility through several possible mechanisms. Cells with high POPX2 levels also have high MAPK activity which in turn positively impacts on cell motility13,80. Since POPX2 enhances stress fiber formation and maintenance through blocking PAK activity and through a MLC-related mechanism, the phosphatase can thus modulate cell migration through remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton. Meanwhile, POPX2 also interacts with mDia1. This interaction could also lead to changes in actin polymerization. Focal adhesion turnover is also important in cell migration. Through its interaction with βPIX and PAK, POPX2 could potentially regulate focal adhesion turnover. In addition, POPX2 might also exert its influence on focal adhesion through the regulation of the Hippo pathway as YAP has been reported to control focal adhesion assembly84. POPX2 can thus participate in the crosstalk between the Hippo pathway and focal adhesion signaling.

The kinase and phosphatase pair, CaMKII and POPX2, regulates KIF3A phosphorylation status and its ability to transport cargoes along the microtubules. The loss of KIF3 cargoes such as N-cadherin at the cell surface leads to impairment of cell–cell adhesion, which in turn can influence the dissemination of tumor cells19. Defects in N-cadherin and Par-3 localization also alter centrosome orientation and placement, leading to loss of polarity20. Therefore, POPX2 overexpressing cells exhibit reduced cell–cell contacts as well as loss of polarity, which are features of mesenchymal cell19,20.

Tumor cell polarity and intravasation

Metastatic cells are non-polarized and are loosely attached to the ECM for rapid migration85. Loss of cell polarity renders the tumor cells more sensitive to external chemotactic signals and become more attracted to signals found in the blood vessels in the primary tumor86. POPX2 overexpressing cells showed loss of polarity, which suggests possible roles in EMT20. POPX2 also regulates the stability of the microtubule network in migrating cells through the MAPK-stathmin axis80. Stathmin promotes microtubule depolymerization and turnover87,88,89,90. Silencing POPX2 results in decreased MAPK phosphorylation level and its kinase activity, possibly leading to lower phosphorylation of stathmin and changes in microtubule dynamics. Indeed, fewer stable microtubules are observed at the leading edge of POPX2-knockdown cells80. Microtubules may not be required for cell migration in most cell types, they are however, required for the maintenance of cell polarity and directed cell migration91. In addition, microtubules can influence focal adhesion assembly, maturation, and turnover. Taken together, overexpression of POPX2 in the cells could contribute to tumor invasion through loss of adhesion, polarity and increased cell motility via KIF3A-mediated cargo transport, MAPK pathway activation, and modulation of the microtubules.

PAK is involved in the assembly and disassembly of invadopodia92,93. In addition, βPIX is also found to be required for invadopodia formation94. Cells with increased βPIX levels show enhanced invadopodia formation. Whether POPX2, as a negative regulator of PAK and an interacting protein of βPIX, has any role in the turnover or regulation of invadopodia is worth investigating.

Circulation and anoikis resistance

Tumor cells invade into the vasculature and travel to distant locations in the body, where they seed new metastatic colonies95. Tumor cells in circulation are deprived of integrin-mediated adhesion to the ECM that is normally essential for cell survival. In physiological context, upon the loss of cell–matrix interactions, epithelial cells undergo anoikis. However, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) acquire anoikis resistance, thus allowing them to survive in circulation96. POPX2 has recently been shown to promote anoikis resistance by suppressing LATS1-mediated Hippo pathway. High levels of POPX2 in the cells reduce the activity of LATS1, leading to increased YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation. This, in turn, leads to TEAD-mediated gene expression and the upregulation of proliferation- and anchorage independence-related gene expression12. Therefore, it is likely that high levels of POPX2 in the cancer cells can upregulate anchorage independence, leading to survival of tumor cells without cell–matrix interactions.

Metastatic colonization and angiogenesis

Metastasis is the most-deadly phase of tumor progression to the cancer patient. The CTCs extravasate from blood vessels and attach to the parenchyma of distant tissues. The tumor cells are able to traverse the endothelial wall of the blood capillaries through a process called trans-endothelial migration (TEM)97. TEM and vascular integrity are influenced by secreted proteins such as vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinases. These secreted proteins are important for promoting intravasation and extravasation during metastasis97,98. In order for the tumor cells to thrive in the new microenvironment of the distant tissues, they require stimulation by additional secreted proteins such as growth factors and cytokines. Secretome study using the conditioned media from POPX2-knockdown breast cancer cells demonstrated that silencing POPX2 promotes the secretion of cytokines and growth factors16. Consistently, in vitro angiogenesis assays showed that the conditioned media collected from POPX2-knockdown cells increases tube length and vessel branch points compared to those from control cells16. Furthermore, it was also found that the conditioned media from POPX2-knockdown cells contains higher amounts of exosomes16, which could also contribute to angiogenesis99. The secretome study of POPX2-knockdown cells highlighted the paradoxical roles of POPX2 at different stages of cancer.

POPX2 acts as a multifaceted regulator of cancer metastasis. The phosphatase promotes dissemination and migration of tumor cells to blood vessels and survival of cells during circulation through the CaMKII-KIF3A pathway, MAPK pathway, and the Hippo pathway, whereas POPX2 also inhibits cancer metastasis by reducing cytokines secretion and angiogenesis. This is further supported by data from cancer patient samples in Oncomine. Analysis using the cancer microarray database shows that POPX2 gene expression is high in invasive TNBC compared with non-TNBC, while POPX2 gene expression is low at metastatic sites compared with primary cancer sites in many different types of cancers16,81.

The function of POPX2 in cancer treatment and resistance

Drug resistance invariably limits the efficacy of cancer therapies. Cancer cells acquire resistance to chemotherapies by many different mechanisms. The cancer cells can increase drug efflux, enhance DNA damage repair, activate alternative pathways to circumvent the inhibition of the drug targets, and undergo mutation of the drug targets100,101,102. The DNA damage pathway is an attractive drug target because its activation is associated with resistance to genotoxic therapies103. Interestingly, POPX2 has been implicated in the regulation of cell sensitivity toward an etoposide (VP-16), which induces DNA damage. POPX2 could promote apoptosis through inactivation of TAK1 kinase in response to DNA damaging drug15. Therefore, it is likely that low levels of POPX2 can favor inhibition of apoptosis in response to DNA damage, resulting in increased cell survival.

Recent findings of POPX2 and Chk1 interaction23 shed light on how POPX2 might modulate the phosphorylation status of Chk1 and influence cell-cycle progression. Active Chk1 initiates the DNA damage checkpoint that results in arrest at the G1-S phase of the cell cycle. When there is DNA damage, cells with higher levels of POPX2 appear to be able to proceed to S phase compared to those with low levels, which are arrested at G1/S transition due to the activation of Chk1-regulated checkpoint. Interestingly, it has recently been shown that Chk1 activity is oncogenic and is required for the development of blood cancer and lymphoma104. Higher levels of Chk1 in acute myeloid leukemia patients allow the cancer cells to tolerate higher degree of DNA damage105. Therefore, targeting Chk1 or its upstream kinases could be an option to overcome chemoresistance106.

The regulation of POPX2 activity

POPX2 appears to have different roles in cancer progression (Fig. 5). The level and activity of the phosphatase vary at different stages of metastasis. Higher levels of POPX2 favor the initial EMT, whereas lower levels appear to be beneficial for establishing metastatic colonies. It is possible that POPX2 levels and activity are actively regulated in cancer cells. Investigating the activators and inhibitors of POPX2 would be crucial to study its physiological function and clinical application. To date, there are only a few studies concerning the regulators of POPX2. Since PPM phosphatases are activated by Mn2+ or Mg2+, it was found that POPX2 can also be activated by polycations such as poly-L-lysine107. Protocadherin (Pcdh)-γC5 has been identified as an endogenous regulator of POPX2. CaMKI, POPX2, and the C-terminal fragment of Pcdh-γC5 form a ternary complex, which allows Pcdh-γC5 to enhance the activity of POPX2 to dephosphorylate CaMKI21. POPX2 activity can be inhibited by hydrogen peroxide, while the presence of reducing agent can restore POPX2 activity108. The oxidation/reduction status of Cys359 of POPX2 is identified to be crucial in the regulation of its activity. Disulfide bond formation of Cys359 with other cysteine residues (Cys259/Cys315) might lead to conformational changes that result in an inactive phosphatase. These findings suggest that reactive oxygen species (ROS) present in the cells could potentially affect the activities of POPX2. Moreover, high levels of ROS are present in cancer cells due to increased proliferation and metabolic activities109. Although high levels of ROS promote oncogenic phenotypes and tumor progression, excessive levels of ROS will lead to cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence. Certain chemotherapeutic drugs are designed to reduce the antioxidant levels in tumor cells, which can then lead to cell death110. Could ROS function as a switch to control POPX2 activity at different stages of tumor development? This is an interesting question. Besides, it has been suggested that a redox imbalance may exist between primary tumor cells and the more aggressive metastatic cells. Sequential changes of redox balance could influence gene expression and protein stability, thus driving cancer progression111. It might be possible that redox balance tunes POPX2 activity and stability at different tumor stages, which in turn, modulates cancer progression.

Fig. 5: Proposed working model of POPX2 in cancer progression.
figure5

High levels or activity of POPX2 at early stages of metastasis favor cancer cell invasion, migration, and survival in circulation (stages 1, 2, and 4). However, lower levels or activity of POPX2 in cancer cells which have established at metastatic sites promote colonization through upregulation of pro-angiogenic factors and secreted proteins (stage 6). Meanwhile, lower levels or activity of POPX2 also enhance TAK1-mediated antiapoptotic gene expression, which in turn allows the cancer cells to proliferate despite suffering DNA damage (stage 7).

Sueyoshi et al. have reported that Evans Blue and Chicago Sky Blue 6B, which are potent inhibitors of vesicular uptake of L-glutamate, inhibit POPX2112,113. However, these compounds also inhibit other enzymes, suggesting that they are not selective inhibitors of POPX2. The naphthol derivative, 1-amino-8-naphthol-2, 4-disulfonic acid, has been shown to selectively inhibits the activity of POPX2 on CaMKI and the activity of POPX1 on CaMKIV113. There has been no further development of these inhibitors for potential clinical uses. Besides chemical inhibitors of POPXs, microRNAs might be regulating POPX2 expression throughout tumor progression. POPX2 has been reported to be a direct substrate of miR-200c in breast cancer cells. Silencing POPX2 phenocopies miR-200c-mediated inhibition of migration and invasion, suggesting POPX2 might be downstream of miR-200c in regulating cell migration and actin re-organization33. Luo et al. has reported that miR-149 negatively regulates POPX2 expression levels in hepatocellular carcinoma. Overexpression of POPX2 could partially reverse miR-149-mediated inhibition on invasion and migration114. Gene silencing involving tRNase ZL and small noncoding RNA has also been reported to target POPX2115. These noncoding RNAs may function to regulate the levels of POPX2 differently in healthy or cancer cells. More work is required to determine if these noncoding RNAs can function as a “switch” to control POPX2 levels at different stages of tumor development.

The balance between phosphorylation and dephosphorylation is finely modulated by kinases and phosphatases. Dysregulation of these posttranslational modifications can lead to defects in signal transduction and other biological processes that contribute to cancer development. Therefore, investigating potent inhibitors and activators of POPX2 could have important implication for anticancer therapy.

Conclusion

The in vivo functions of POPX2 can be better understood through the discovery and validation of its interacting proteins. Investigations thus far have suggested that POPX2 plays important roles in regulating cell migration and invasion, cell polarity, apoptosis, and cell-cycle checkpoint control. Since POPX2 has been found to interact with many different proteins, it is not surprising that POPX2 can regulate a variety of cellular processes implicated in tumorigenesis. Further studies on how POPX2’s activities and levels are regulated will help to better understand the function of POPX2 at different stages of tumorigenesis. More work is required to identify the specific contexts in which activation or inhibition of POPX2 may be applied toward therapeutic intervention of cancer.

References

  1. 1.

    Cohen, P. The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation—a 25 year update. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 596–601 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Barford, D., Das, A. K. & Egloff, M. P. The structure and mechanism of protein phosphatases: insights into catalysis and regulation. Annu Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 27, 133–164 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cohen, P. T. Novel protein serine/threonine phosphatases: variety is the spice of life. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 245–251 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cohen, P. The structure and regulation of protein phosphatases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58, 453–508 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Haystead, T. A. et al. Effects of the tumour promoter okadaic acid on intracellular protein phosphorylation and metabolism. Nature 337, 78–81 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ishida, A., Kameshita, I. & Fujisawa, H. A novel protein phosphatase that dephosphorylates and regulates Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1904–1910 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Koh, C.-G., Tan, E. J., Manser, E. & Lim, L. The p21-activated kinase PAK is negatively regulated by POPX1 and POPX2, a pair of serine/threonine phosphatases of the PP2C family. Curr. Biol. 12, 317–321 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Takeuchi, M., Taniguchi, T. & Fujisawa, H. Identification and characterization of nuclear localization signals of CaMKP-N. J. Biochem. 136, 183–188 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ishida, A., Sueyoshi, N. & Kameshita, I. Functions and dysfunctions of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase phosphatase (CaMKP/PPM1F) and CaMKP-N/PPM1E. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 640, 83–92 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Berggård, T., Linse, S. & James, P. Methods for the detection and analysis of protein–protein interactions. Proteomics 7, 2833–2842 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Keskin, O., Tuncbag, N. & Gursoy, A. Predicting protein–protein interactions from the molecular to the proteome level. Chem. Rev. 116, 4884–4909 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rahmat, M. B., Zhang, S. & Koh, C.-G. POPX2 is a novel LATS phosphatase that regulates the Hippo pathway. Oncotarget 10, 1525–1538 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Singh, P. et al. Investigation of POPX2 phosphatase functions by comparative phosphoproteomic analysis. Proteomics 11, 2891–2900 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Susila, A. et al. The POPX2 phosphatase regulates cancer cell motility and invasiveness. Cell Cycle 9, 179–187 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Weng, T. & Koh, C.-G. POPX2 phosphatase regulates apoptosis through the TAK1-IKK-NF-κB pathway. Cell Death Dis. 8, e3051 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhang, S. et al. Phosphatase POPX2 exhibits dual regulatory functions in cancer metastasis. J. Proteome Res. 16, 698–711 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Xie, Y. et al. Functional interactions between phosphatase POPX2 and mDia modulate RhoA pathways. J. Cell Sci. 121, 514–521 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Voss, M. et al. Ppm1E is an in cellulo AMP-activated protein kinase phosphatase. Cell. Signal. 23, 114–124 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Phang, H.-Q. et al. POPX2 phosphatase regulates the KIF3 kinesin motor complex. J. Cell Sci. 127, 727–739 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hoon, J.-L., Li, H.-Y. & Koh, C.-G. POPX2 phosphatase regulates cell polarity and centrosome placement. Cell Cycle 13, 2459–2468 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Onouchi, T., Kishino-Kaneko, Y., Kameshita, I., Ishida, A. & Sueyoshi, N. Regulation of Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase phosphatase (CaMKP/PPM1F) by protocadherin-γC5 (Pcdh-γC5). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 585, 109–120 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ozaki, H. et al. Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase phosphatase (CaMKP/PPM1F) interacts with neurofilament L and inhibits its filament association. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 477, 820–825 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kim, P. R. et al. Phosphatase POPX2 interferes with cell cycle by interacting with Chk1. Cell Cycle 19, 405–418 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Murali, A. & Rajalingam, K. Small Rho GTPases in the control of cell shape and mobility. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 1703–1721 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Raftopoulou, M. & Hall, A. Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way. Dev. Biol. 265, 23–32 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ridley, A. J. Rho GTPases and cell migration. J. Cell Sci. 114, 2713–2722 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bishop, A. L. & Hall, A. Rho GTPases and their effector proteins. Biochem. J. 348, 241–255 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ridley, A. J. & Hall, A. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell 70, 389–399 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ohta, Y., Suzuki, N., Nakamura, S., Hartwig, J. H. & Stossel, T. P. The small GTPase RalA targets filamin to induce filopodia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 2122–2128 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Weed, S. A. et al. Cortactin localization to sites of actin assembly in lamellipodia requires interactions with F-Actin and the Arp2/3 complex. J. Cell Biol. 151, 29–40 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Manser, E. et al. PAK kinases are directly coupled to the PIX family of nucleotide exchange factors. Mol. Cell 1, 183–192 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chong, C., Tan, L., Lim, L. & Manser, E. The mechanism of PAK activation. Autophosphorylation events in both regulatory and kinase domains control activity. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 17347–17353 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Jurmeister, S. et al. MicroRNA-200c represses migration and invasion of breast cancer cells by targeting actin-regulatory proteins FHOD1 and PPM1F. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 633–651 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Totsukawa, G. et al. Distinct roles of ROCK (Rho-kinase) and MLCK in spatial regulation of MLC phosphorylation for assembly of stress fibers and focal adhesions in 3T3 fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 150, 797–806 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Katoh, K., Kano, Y., Amano, M., Kaibuchi, K. & Fujiwara, K. Stress fiber organization regulated by MLCK and Rho-kinase in cultured human fibroblasts. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 280, C1669–C1679 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Alberts, A. S. Identification of a carboxyl-terminal diaphanous-related formin homology protein autoregulatory domain. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 2824–2830 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Otomo, T., Otomo, C., Tomchick, D. R., Machius, M. & Rosen, M. K. Structural basis of Rho GTPase-mediated activation of the formin mDia1. Mol. Cell 18, 273–281 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hirokawa, N., Nitta, R. & Okada, Y. The mechanisms of kinesin motor motility: lessons from the monomeric motor KIF1A. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 877–884 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Jimbo, T. et al. Identification of a link between the tumour suppressor APC and the kinesin superfamily. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 323–327 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Schonteich, E. et al. The Rip11/Rab11-FIP5 and kinesin II complex regulates endocytic protein recycling. J. Cell Sci. 121, 3824–3833 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Takeda, S. et al. Kinesin superfamily protein 3 (KIF3) motor transports fodrin-associating vesicles important for neurite building. J. Cell Biol. 148, 1255–1265 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Teng, J. et al. The KIF3 motor transports N-cadherin and organizes the developing neuroepithelium. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 474–482 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Nishimura, T. et al. Role of the PAR-3-KIF3 complex in the establishment of neuronal polarity. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 328–334 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Chen, K. et al. Phosphorylation regulates auto-inhibition of kinesin KIF3A. 503680, https://doi.org/10.1101/503680 (2018).

  45. 45.

    Dupin, I., Camand, E. & Etienne-Manneville, S. Classical cadherins control nucleus and centrosome position and cell polarity. J. Cell Biol. 185, 779–786 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Schmoranzer, J. et al. Par3 and dynein associate to regulate local microtubule dynamics and centrosome orientation during migration. Curr. Biol. 19, 1065–1074 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Suzuki, A. & Ohno, S. The PAR-aPKC system: lessons in polarity. J. Cell Sci. 119, 979–987 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ishida, A., Okuno, S., Kitani, T., Kameshita, I. & Fujisawa, H. Regulation of multifunctional Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase phosphatase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 253, 159–163 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Sueyoshi, N. et al. Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase phosphatase (CaMKP) is indispensable for normal embryogenesis in zebrafish, Danio rerio. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 488, 48–59 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Grueter, C. E., Colbran, R. J. & Anderson, M. E. CaMKII, an emerging molecular driver for calcium homeostasis, arrhythmias, and cardiac dysfunction. J. Mol. Med. 85, 5–14 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Chi, M. et al. Phosphorylation of calcium/calmodulin-stimulated protein kinase II at T286 enhances invasion and migration of human breast cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 33132 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wang, Y. Y., Zhao, R. & Zhe, H. The emerging role of CaMKII in cancer. Oncotarget 6, 11725–11734 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Pan, D. The hippo signaling pathway in development and cancer. Dev. Cell 19, 491–505 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Hergovich, A., Schmitz, D. & Hemmings, B. A. The human tumour suppressor LATS1 is activated by human MOB1 at the membrane. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 345, 50–58 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Zhao, B., Li, L., Tumaneng, K., Wang, C.-Y. & Guan, K.-L. A coordinated phosphorylation by Lats and CK1 regulates YAP stability through SCFβ-TRCP. Genes Dev. 24, 72–85 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Lin, K. C., Park, H. W. & Guan, K.-L. Regulation of the Hippo pathway transcription factor TEAD. Trends Biochem. Sci. 42, 862–872 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hergovich, A. The roles of NDR protein kinases in Hippo signalling. Genes 7, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes7050021 (2016).

  58. 58.

    Carling, D. The role of the AMP-activated protein kinase in the regulation of energy homeostasis. Novartis Found. Symp. 286, 72–81 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Hardie, D. G. AMPK: a key regulator of energy balance in the single cell and the whole organism. Int J. Obes. 32(Suppl 4), S7–S12 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Zhou, G. et al. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action. J. Clin. Invest. 108, 1167–1174 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Li, X. et al. AMPK-mediated energy homeostasis and associated metabolic effects on cancer cell response and resistance to cetuximab. Oncotarget 6, 11507–11518 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Joo, M. S. et al. AMPK facilitates nuclear accumulation of Nrf2 by phosphorylating at serine 550. Mol. Cell Biol. 36, 1931–1942 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kensler, T. W., Wakabayashi, N. & Biswal, S. Cell survival responses to environmental stresses via the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway. Annu Rev. Pharm. Toxicol. 47, 89–116 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Huang, H. C., Nguyen, T. & Pickett, C. B. Phosphorylation of Nrf2 at Ser-40 by protein kinase C regulates antioxidant response element-mediated transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 42769–42774 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Niture, S. K., Jain, A. K. & Jaiswal, A. K. Antioxidant-induced modification of INrf2 cysteine 151 and PKC-delta-mediated phosphorylation of Nrf2 serine 40 are both required for stabilization and nuclear translocation of Nrf2 and increased drug resistance. J. Cell Sci. 122, 4452–4464 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Sato, S. et al. Essential function for the kinase TAK1 in innate and adaptive immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 6, 1087–1095 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Ninomiya-Tsuji, J. et al. The kinase TAK1 can activate the NIK-I kappaB as well as the MAP kinase cascade in the IL-1 signalling pathway. Nature 398, 252–256 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ishitani, T. et al. Role of the TAB2-related protein TAB3 in IL-1 and TNF signaling. EMBO J. 22, 6277–6288 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Shibuya, H. et al. TAB1: an activator of the TAK1 MAPKKK in TGF-beta signal transduction. Science 272, 1179–1182 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Takaesu, G. et al. TAB2, a novel adaptor protein, mediates activation of TAK1 MAPKKK by linking TAK1 to TRAF6 in the IL-1 signal transduction pathway. Mol. Cell 5, 649–658 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ea, C.-K., Sun, L., Inoue, J.-I. & Chen, Z. J. TIFA activates IκB kinase (IKK) by promoting oligomerization and ubiquitination of TRAF6. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 101, 15318–15323 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Kanayama, A. et al. TAB2 and TAB3 activate the NF-kappaB pathway through binding to polyubiquitin chains. Mol. Cell 15, 535–548 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Kishimoto, K., Matsumoto, K. & Ninomiya-Tsuji, J. TAK1 mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase is activated by autophosphorylation within its activation loop. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 7359–7364 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Chen, Z. J., Bhoj, V. & Seth, R. B. Ubiquitin, TAK1 and IKK: is there a connection? Cell Death Differ. 13, 687–692 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Simeonidis, S., Stauber, D., Chen, G., Hendrickson, W. A. & Thanos, D. Mechanisms by which IkappaB proteins control NF-kappaB activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 49–54 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Tan, K. M., Chan, S. L., Tan, K. O. & Yu, V. C. The Caenorhabditis elegans sex-determining protein FEM-2 and its human homologue, hFEM-2, are Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase phosphatases that promote apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 44193–44202 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Patil, M., Pabla, N. & Dong, Z. Checkpoint kinase 1 in DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 70, 4009–4021 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Sørensen, C. S. et al. Chk1 regulates the S phase checkpoint by coupling the physiological turnover and ionizing radiation-induced accelerated proteolysis of Cdc25A. Cancer Cell 3, 247–258 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Xiao, Z. et al. Chk1 mediates S and G2 arrests through Cdc25A degradation in response to DNA-damaging agents. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 21767–21773 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Zhang, S., Guo, T., Chan, H., Sze, S. K. & Koh, C. G. Integrative transcriptome and proteome study to identify the signaling network regulated by POPX2 phosphatase. J. Proteome Res. 12, 2525–2536 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Rhodes, D. R. et al. ONCOMINE: a cancer microarray database and integrated data-mining platform. Neoplasia 6, 1–6 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Valastyan, S. & Weinberg, R. A. Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell 147, 275–292 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Polyak, K. & Weinberg, R. A. Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 265–273 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Nardone, G. et al. YAP regulates cell mechanics by controlling focal adhesion assembly. Nat. Commun. 8, 15321 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Condeelis, J. & Segall, J. E. Intravital imaging of cell movement in tumours. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 921–930 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Shestakova, E. A., Singer, R. H. & Condeelis, J. The physiological significance of β-actin mRNA localization in determining cell polarity and directional motility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 98, 7045 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Cassimeris, L. The oncoprotein 18/stathmin family of microtubule destabilizers. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 18–24 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Rubin, C. I. & Atweh, G. F. The role of stathmin in the regulation of the cell cycle. J. Cell. Biochem. 93, 242–250 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Watanabe, T., Noritake, J. & Kaibuchi, K. Regulation of microtubules in cell migration. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 76–83 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Wittmann, T. & Waterman-Storer, C. M. Cell motility: can Rho GTPases and microtubules point the way? J. Cell Sci. 114, 3795–3803 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Etienne-Manneville, S. Microtubules in cell migration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 29, 471–499 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Moshfegh, Y., Bravo-Cordero, J. J., Miskolci, V., Condeelis, J. & Hodgson, L. A Trio-Rac1-Pak1 signalling axis drives invadopodia disassembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 350 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Jeannot, P. et al. p27(Kip1) promotes invadopodia turnover and invasion through the regulation of the PAK1/Cortactin pathway. Elife 6, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22207 (2017).

  94. 94.

    Md Hashim, N. F. et al. Hypoxia-induced invadopodia formation: a role for beta-PIX. Open Biol. 3, 120159 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Kang, Y. & Pantel, K. Tumor cell dissemination: emerging biological insights from animal models and cancer patients. Cancer Cell 23, 573–581 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Guo, W. & Giancotti, F. G. Integrin signalling during tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 816–826 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Reymond, N., d'Água, B. B. & Ridley, A. J. Crossing the endothelial barrier during metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 858–870 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Gupta, G. P. et al. Mediators of vascular remodelling co-opted for sequential steps in lung metastasis. Nature 446, 765–770 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Liang, X., Zhang, L., Wang, S., Han, Q. & Zhao, R. C. Exosomes secreted by mesenchymal stem cells promote endothelial cell angiogenesis by transferring miR-125a. J. Cell Sci. 129, 2182–2189 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Holohan, C., Van Schaeybroeck, S., Longley, D. B. & Johnston, P. G. Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 714–726 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Lee, H.-J. et al. Drug resistance via feedback activation of Stat3 in oncogene-addicted cancer cells. Cancer Cell 26, 207–221 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Obenauf, A. C. et al. Therapy-induced tumour secretomes promote resistance and tumour progression. Nature 520, 368–372 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Weber, A. M. & Ryan, A. J. ATM and ATR as therapeutic targets in cancer. Pharmacol. Ther. 149, 124–138 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Schuler, F. et al. Checkpoint kinase 1 is essential for normal B cell development and lymphomagenesis. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–13 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    David, L., Manenti, S., Récher, C., Hoffmann, J.-S. & Didier, C. Targeting ATR/CHK1 pathway in acute myeloid leukemia to overcome chemoresistance. Mol. Cell Oncol. 4, https://doi.org/10.1080/23723556.2017.1289293 (2017).

  106. 106.

    David, L. et al. CHK1 as a therapeutic target to bypass chemoresistance in AML. Sci. Signal. 9, ra90 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Ishida, A. et al. Stimulation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase phosphatase by polycations. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 408, 229–238 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Baba, H., Sueyoshi, N., Shigeri, Y., Ishida, A. & Kameshita, I. Regulation of Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase phosphatase (CaMKP) by oxidation/reduction at Cys-359. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 526, 9–15 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Liou, G. Y. & Storz, P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic. Res 44, 479–496 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Perillo, B. et al. ROS in cancer therapy: the bright side of the moon. Exp. Mol. Med 52, 192–203 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Jorgenson, T. C., Zhong, W. & Oberley, T. D. Redox imbalance and biochemical changes in cancer. Cancer Res. 73, 6118–6123 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Roseth, S., Fykse, E. M. & Fonnum, F. Uptake of L-glutamate into synaptic vesicles: competitive inhibition by dyes with biphenyl and amino- and sulphonic acid-substituted naphthyl groups. Biochem. Pharmacol. 56, 1243–1249 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Sueyoshi, N. et al. Inhibitors of the Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase phosphatase family (CaMKP and CaMKP-N). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 363, 715–721 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Luo, G. et al. miR-149 represses metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting actin-regulatory proteins PPM1F. Oncotarget 6, 37808–37823 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Elbarbary, R. A. et al. Modulation of gene expression by human cytosolic tRNase Z(L) through 5′-half-tRNA. PLoS ONE 4, e5908 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (SUG) and Ministry of Education, Singapore (Tier 1 and Tier 2 grants) for funding support.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Gee Koh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Edited by F. Pentimalli

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, P.R., Zhang, S., Rahmat, M.B. et al. Partners in crime: POPX2 phosphatase and its interacting proteins in cancer. Cell Death Dis 11, 840 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-03061-0

Download citation

Search