An intact cell death machinery is not only crucial for successful embryonic development and tissue homeostasis, but participates also in the defence against pathogens and contributes to a balanced immune response. Centrally involved in the regulation of both cell death and inflammatory immune responses is the evolutionarily conserved family of cysteine proteases named caspases. The Drosophila melanogaster genome encodes for seven caspases, several of which display dual functions, participating in apoptotic signalling and beyond. Among the Drosophila caspases, the caspase-8 homologue Dredd has a well-characterised role in inflammatory signalling activated by bacterial infections, and functions as a driver of NF-κB-mediated immune responses. Regarding the other Drosophila caspases, studies focusing on tissue-specific immune signalling and host-microbe interactions have recently revealed immunoregulatory functions of the initiator caspase Dronc and the effector caspase Drice. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the signalling cascades involved in the Drosophila humoral innate immune response against pathogens and of their caspase-mediated regulation. Furthermore, the apoptotic role of caspases during antibacterial and antiviral immune activation will be discussed.
Cell death and inflammation are cellular processes crucial for maintaining tissue homeostasis . Centrally involved in both processes is the evolutionarily conserved family of cysteine proteases, named caspases (cysteine-aspartic proteases). By driving apoptosis, a homeostatic form of cell death, caspases control the non-lytic elimination of cells during development, and the clearance of cells that are damaged, old or no longer necessary in the adult organism . Besides regulating apoptosis, caspases also drive inflammatory signalling in response to pathogenic infection by triggering the release of inflammatory cytokines and by inducing pyroptosis, a proinflammatory form of cell death [2, 3]. Based on these described functions, caspases can be broadly divided into inflammatory and apoptotic caspases. The apoptotic caspases are further subdivided into initiator and effector caspases, depending on their position in the apoptotic signalling cascade . Structurally, caspases consist of an amino-terminal prodomain of variable size followed by one large (p20) and one small (p10) subunit that together form the catalytically active protease domain (Fig. 1A). Inflammatory and apoptotic initiator caspases contain specific recruitment domains, i.e., Death effector domains (DEDs) or Caspase recruitment domains (CARDs) in the N-terminal prodomain (Fig. 1A). These domains facilitate recruitment of caspase monomers to oligomeric activation platforms, e.g., the pattern-recognition receptor (PRR) induced inflammasomes, the mammalian apoptosome, the Death inducing signalling complex (DISC), and the p53-induced protein with a death domain (PIDD)-osome, in which the initiator caspases are activated [4,5,6]. The apoptotic effector proteins have short prodomains that lack specific interaction domains (Fig. 1A). These caspases exist as dimers and gain activity through proteolytic processing of a linker region separating the large and small subunit, mediated by an upstream caspase [6, 7].
Given their crucial role as executors of cell death, both the activation process and the enzymatic activity of caspases need to be carefully regulated. In addition to synthesising caspases as inactive zymogens, or procaspases, requiring dimerization and proteolytic processing to gain activity, the cell employs several strategies, such as decoy proteins, posttranslational modifications and caspase inhibitors to regulate caspase activity [7, 8]. In metazoans, the main protein group of caspase regulators is the Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) protein family, whose members harbour one to three characteristic Baculoviral IAP repeat (BIR) domains . Some IAPs are furthermore, important transduction intermediates in cellular signalling cascades, specifically during innate immune responses and Nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation [10, 11]. Due to the role of caspases and IAPs at the frontline of immunity and cell death, these proteins and their interaction have served as interesting targets when studying inflammatory signalling and immunohomeostasis.
Drosophila melanogaster is one of the most commonly used model organisms in biological research. Its short life cycle and high breeding rate, low maintenance fees, and a simpler, less redundant genome compared to mammalian models, have made the fruit fly an invaluable research model . Moreover, the versatile genetic tool-box of Drosophila with collections of mutants and genetically modified flies, engineered to enable manipulation of gene activity both temporally and spatially, enables sophisticated genetic analyses to be carried out on tissue or whole-organism level in the fly. Research done in Drosophila has contributed to major advancements in the fields of genetics, development, behaviour and immunity [13, 14] and, the fruit fly is recognised as a powerful disease model for diabetes, cancer, and neuropathologies, and for the distinct diseases of heart, lung and intestine [15,16,17,18,19,20]. When it comes to the cellular regulation of innate immunity, research performed in Drosophila has contributed greatly in understanding receptor activation, signal transduction and transcriptional activation during host defence . Similarly, the molecular role of caspases in innate immunity, inflammatory signalling and immunohomeostasis has been elucidated in the fly [22,23,24,25,26,27]. In addition to the molecular regulation of inflammation, Drosophila has emerged as a versatile model in which to study complex physiological aspects of immune defence, such as the spread or restriction of infection , the priming and memory of the immune system  and, finally, the local immune system and microenvironment of barrier epithelia . This review aims to give an overview of the structure and function of the Drosophila caspases and of the humoral part of the fly’s immune system. It will describe the current knowledge on caspase-mediated regulation of inflammatory signalling induced upon infection and during host-microbe interactions. In addition, the role of cell death activation in response to viral and bacterial infection will be discussed.
Drosophila caspases and their function
Caspases have been identified in all metazoans, ranging from Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila, to mouse and human . Drosophila carries seven caspases: three initiator caspases, namely Death related ced-3/Nedd2-like caspase (Dredd), Death regulator Nedd2-like caspase (Dronc) and Ser/Thr-rich caspase (Strica) [32,33,34], and four effector caspases, called Drosophila caspase interleukin 1β-converting enzyme (Drice), Death-associated molecule related to Mch2 (Damm), Death executioner caspase related to apopain/yama (Decay) and Drosophila caspase-1 (Dcp-1) [34,35,36,37] (Fig. 1B). All Drosophila caspases have been connected to apoptotic signalling [32, 35,36,37,38,39,40], however, some seem to have their main function, or additional roles, beyond cell death [22, 24, 41,42,43].
Drosophila Dronc is homologous to human caspase-9 and is the main apoptosis-initiating caspase in the fly . In resting cells, Dronc is inhibited by the antiapoptotic protein Drosophila iap1 (Diap1) . During apoptosis, the proapoptotic proteins Reaper, Grim and Hid bind to Diap1, antagonising the Diap1-Dronc interaction, hence freeing Dronc [46, 47]. Freed Dronc is recruited to Death-associated Apaf1-related killer (Dark) via CARD-CARD interactions and is subsequently activated [48, 49]. Activated Dronc cleaves effector caspases Drice and Dcp-1, which in turn cleave downstream substrates, thereby executing apoptosis [38, 45]. In addition to inhibiting Dronc, Diap1 has been shown to inhibit Drice and Dcp-1 [47, 50]. These effector caspases are homologous to mammalian caspase-3 and seem to have partially overlapping functions during apoptosis. Dcp-1 mutants display milder defects in apoptotic signalling compared to Drice mutants, however, the phenotype of double Drice/Dcp-1 mutants is stronger than that of either one alone [43, 51, 52]. A second Drosophila IAP protein, Drosophila iap2 (Diap2), mainly known for its potent role as an inducer of inflammatory signalling upon infection by Gram-negative bacteria [53,54,55,56], has also been shown to inhibit Drice, thereby lowering the apoptotic threshold of the cell . We, furthermore, recently demonstrated that Drice, through its interaction with Diap2, has a role beyond apoptotic signalling as a regulator of inflammatory signalling .
While the caspase-8 homologue Dredd has been implicated to function in apoptotic signalling [32, 58], its major function has been established to be a regulator of the inflammatory response triggered by Gram-negative bacteria . Dredd contains two DED domains in its prodomain, needed for caspase recruitment to the bacteria-induced receptor complex and for interaction with Diap2 [23, 59]. Besides being homologous to caspase-8, Dredd is also structurally similar to cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a member of the mammalian DISC-complex that regulates both apoptotic caspase-8 activity and inflammatory NF-κB signalling . Similarly as caspase-8 and Dredd, c-FLIP contains two DED domains that mediate recruitment to DISC, and is suggested to facilitate interaction with the downstream NF-κB pathway member NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO) [60, 61]. Hence, it seems that the functions performed by Dredd have evolved to be executed separately by caspase-8 and c-FLIP in mammals. The caspases Decay, Strica and Damm have not received as much attention as the other Drosophila caspases, however, Decay was recently found to regulate wing size, independently of Dronc-induced apoptosis . Strica is known to contain a unique serine and threonine rich prodomain, however, the functions of Strica or Damm, remain largely unknown.
The Drosophila immune response
In its defence against pathogens, Drosophila mainly relies on an innate immune response, aided, similarly as in mammals, by physical barriers, such as the epithelial lining beneath the cuticle in the digestive tract and trachea . The Drosophila innate immune system can be roughly divided into a humoral and a cellular response. The cell-mediated immune response of Drosophila is carried out by freely circulating, or tissue-associated specialised blood cells, called haemocytes . The haemocytes participate in the immune response by mediating phagocytosis, encapsulation of invading pathogens, wound closure, and by secretion of clotting factors and cytokines . These cells also function as activators of the humoral part of the immune system, and the crosstalk between the cellular and humoral response is abundant [63, 64]. The humoral response involves the production of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and antipathogenic factors through the Toll, Imd, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signalling pathways (Fig. 2) . The aforementioned pathways seem to also be involved in the antiviral defence. However, activity of this fraction of the immune response is suggested to mainly be mediated via the RNA interference (RNAi) pathways, restricting viral replication via targeted degradation of viral double stranded RNA (dsRNA) [65, 66]. In addition to RNAi, the Drosophila stimulator of interferon genes (dSting) pathway, inducing expression of antiviral factors upon sensing of viral dsRNA by the cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS)-like receptor 1 (cGLR1), aids in the immune response against viruses (Fig. 2) . The presence of an adaptive immune response in insects remains relatively unexplored. However, described cases of immune priming, resulting in a stronger specific immune response towards secondary infection  and RNAi-based immunological memory , point towards the presence of a specific, adaptive immune response also in Drosophila.
Caspase-mediated regulation of the Imd pathway
A hallmark of the Drosophila innate immune response is the Imd and Toll pathway-mediated activation of NF-κB transcription factors that drive the production and secretion of AMPs (Fig. 2) . The Imd pathway is activated by diaminopimelic acid (DAP)-type peptidoglycan (PGN), present in the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria, recognised by the transmembrane PRR Peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP)-LC or the intracellular receptor PGRP-LE [70,71,72,73]. The receptors are thought to dimerise or oligomerise upon ligand binding, whereafter the adaptor protein Imd is recruited to the complex [74,75,76]. Imd recruits the adaptor protein Drosophila Fas-associated death domain protein (dFadd), which in turn binds to the caspase-8 homologue Dredd [59, 77], a central component of the Imd pathway, and a driver of NF-κB-mediated immune responses (Fig. 3). The importance of Dredd in the Drosophila immune response was first demonstrated in 2000, when Lemaitre and colleagues identified five Ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations in Dredd, all severely impairing bacteria-induced Diptericin expression in the fly . Further characterisation of one of the mutants, DreddB118, containing a premature stop-codon in the Dredd prodomain, revealed the caspase to be crucial specifically during the immune response induced by Gram-negative bacteria . The link between Dredd and activation of the NF-κB transcription factor Relish was further elucidated by the laboratory of Dan Hultmark, showing that activation of Relish proceeds through a signal dependent endoproteolytic step leading to the nuclear translocalisation of the Rel-68 truncated form, and that this Relish-cleavage was absent in Dredd mutants post infection . Dredd was later confirmed to, indeed, be the caspase responsible of cleaving Relish [78, 79], but also to process the apical-most adaptor protein of the Imd pathway, i.e., Imd itself [26, 79], and to, thereby, enable recruitment of Diap2 to the receptor complex (Fig. 3A, B) . By studying the Diap2-Dredd interaction and characterising one of the Dredd mutants originally identified by Leulier et al., DreddD44, harbouring a glycine-to-arginine point mutation at position 120 , we were able to show that signal-dependent lysine 63 (K63)-linked ubiquitination of Dredd is required for Relish target gene activation (Fig. 3C), and for fly survival in response to Gram-negative bacterial infection . The function of the ubiquitin chains on Dredd remains to be elucidated. However, it is possible that these chains serve as scaffolds for the recruitment of other protein complexes needed for downstream signalling, such as the IκB kinase (IKK) complex, consisting of the regulatory subunit Kenny, homologous to mammalian NEMO or IKKγ, and of the catalytic subunit called Immune response deficient 5 (Ird5), homologous to the mammalian IKKβ [80, 81]. Furthermore, as synthesis of methionine 1 (M1)-linked ubiquitin chains is required for local NF-κB-mediated immune responses in the fly , ubiquitin chain types beyond the previously described K63-linked chains might regulate yet unidentified tissue specific functions on Dredd. In addition to Dredd-mediated activation of Relish and recruitment of the aforementioned IKK complex, the Drosophila TGF-β activated kinase 1 (dTak1)/Drosophila Tak1 binding protein (dTab2) complex is needed for intact Imd signalling [74, 78]. The role of dTak1 may be to induce activation of Ird5 by phosphorylation, similarly as Ird5 is known to activate Relish by phosphorylation. However, while Relish phosphorylation drives transcription and recruitment of RNA polymerase II, it is not needed for Relish cleavage or nuclear translocation .
In contrast to the fat body-mediated immune response towards bacterial infections, regulated by both the Imd and Toll pathway, Imd signalling is believed to be the sole driver of NF-κB activity during local epithelial immune responses of, for instance, the gut and trachea [83, 84]. Intestinal Imd signalling needs to be carefully regulated in order to ensure efficient elimination of pathogens, while allowing for beneficial host-microbe interactions to be established. We have recently described a role of the caspase Drice as a negative regulator of intestinal Imd signalling induced by commensal bacteria . By forming a covalent complex with Diap2, the details of which have been previously described , Drice triggers the tissue-specific proteasomal degradation of both proteins . As a consequence, Diap2 is unable to interact with members of the Imd pathway and downstream signalling is halted (Fig. 4). As Diap2 has been shown to ubiquitinate itself  and Drice , we speculate that formation of a Diap2-Drice complex induces Diap2-mediated K48-linked ubiquitination of both proteins, targeting them for proteasomal degradation (Fig. 4). Drice-mediated regulation of Diap2 indicates that caspases, known to be regulated by IAP-proteins during cell death , are indeed themselves able to modify the activity of inflammatory IAP-proteins.
The Drosophila Toll signalling pathway
Toll signalling is initiated by extracellular PRRs that recognise conserved structures of the cell wall of fungi or Gram-positive bacteria. Fungal β-glucan is identified by the Gram-negative binding protein 3 (GNBP3) , whereas Lys-type PGN from Gram-positive bacteria is identified by a complex consisting of PGRP-SA and GNBP1 (Fig. 2) . These PRRs induce a serine-cascade leading to the proteolysis-dependent activation of the extracellular cytokine Spätzle that, by functioning as the Toll receptor ligand, activates downstream signalling [87, 88]. Upon receptor activation, the adaptor protein Myeloid differentiation primary response (MyD88), the adaptor protein Tube and the kinase Pelle are recruited to form a MyD88-Tube-Pelle trimeric complex [89, 90]. Pelle drives downstream signalling by phosphorylating the inhibitory IκB protein Cactus, thereby targeting Cactus for proteasomal degradation . The NF-κB transcription factors Dorsal-related immunity factor (Dif) and Dorsal, sequestered in the cytoplasm by Cactus in resting cells, are released, and enter the nucleus in order to activate anti-inflammatory target genes [91,92,93]. Among the Drosophila caspases, Dronc and Dredd have been connected to the Toll-pathway. Apoptosis-deficient Dronc mutants display chronic activation of Toll signalling in the absence of infection, and the caspase has been suggested to be involved in the regulation of the Toll-mediated inflammatory response towards danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) . In addition to binding Tube and Pelle, dMyD88 has been shown to interact with dFadd when overexpressed in Drosophila S2 cells . As dFadd is known to recruit Dredd during Imd signalling, this result may indicate that Dredd is able to regulate immune responses induced by Gram-positive bacteria in certain tissues, or, conversely that members of the Toll pathway are recruited downstream of dFadd during activation of the PGRP-LC/LE complex. Although a functional role of Dredd in Toll signalling is yet to be demonstrated, the caspase serves as an interesting candidate when studying mediators of crosstalk between the two NF-κB pathways.
Dredd is needed for bacteria-induced JNK signalling
Besides driving Imd signalling, dTak1 functions also as one of the apical-most kinases in the conserved JNK pathway (Fig. 2) . JNK is involved in a variety of biological processes in Drosophila, including development, metabolism and apoptosis, and in stress and immune responses . Upon activation of dTak1, the kinase phosphorylates the JNK kinase Hemipterous (Hep), which in turn phosphorylates the single Drosophila JNK protein Basket (Bsk) [98, 99]. The JNK pathway culminates, depending on the cellular setting, in the activation of the transcription factors Forkhead Box O (FOXO), or Activator protein-1 (AP-1), a heterodimer consisting of Jun-related antigen (Jra), homologous to mammalian c-Jun, and Kayak (Kay), homologous to mammalian Fos, and to subsequent target gene expression . Co-regulation of JNK and NF-κB signalling is required for a balanced immune response and JNK is needed for proper release of AMPs and is, furthermore, required for Imd-induced epithelial shedding [100, 101]. In addition, the expression patterns of JNK are regulated by Relish that induces the proteasomal degradation of dTak1 upon activation by a Gram-negative bacterial infection, hence terminating JNK signalling . Similarly as for the Imd pathway, Dredd has been shown to be needed for bacteria-induced JNK signalling. RNAi-mediated downregulation of the caspase in Drosophila S2 cells impairs phosphorylation of JNK and subsequent JNK target gene expression upon PGN treatment [103, 104]. Concordantly, DreddB118 mutants are unable to induce JNK phosphorylation or target gene expression in response to septic infection with E. coli .
Caspases regulating the Drosophila antiviral immune response
In its defence against viral infections, Drosophila relies on the antiviral RNAi system and on inducible responses mediated via the dSting, JAK-STAT, Toll and Imd pathways . The host RNAi pathway is triggered upon sensing of viral dsRNA by the RNase III enzyme Dicer-II that processes the dsRNA into small interfering RNAs (siRNA). The siRNAs are loaded into the Argonaute-2 (AGO2) protein, part of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and guide AGO2 to target RNAs to induce their degradation, hence, restricting viral replication (Fig. 2) [65, 66]. Another sensor of viral dsRNA is cGLR1, which drives dSting signalling in virus infected cells. The recognition of viral RNA, triggers cGLR1-mediated synthesis of the secondary messenger 3’2’-cGAMP that by interacting with dSting, drives the dSting-dependent antiviral immune response (Fig. 2) [106, 107]. Interestingly, a second dSting-activating cGLR, cGLR2, producing both 2’3’-cGAMP and 3’2’-cGAMP, was identified simultaneously as cGLR1, however, its upstream ligand remains unidentified .
The JAK/STAT pathway is, similarly as in the mammalian host defence, a key regulator of the Drosophila immune response against virus infections [108, 109]. JAK/STAT signalling contributes, however, also to the immune defence against bacterial infections and controls cellular immunity by regulating haemocyte proliferation and differentiation [110,111,112]. The pathway is driven by three cytokine-like proteins: Unpaired (Upd), Upd2 and Upd3, expressed to various extents during development, tissue damage, viral infections and bacterial challenge [110, 113, 114]. The Upds bind to the receptor Domeless (Dome), inducing its dimerisation  and subsequent activation of the receptor-associated JAK homologue Hopscotch (Hop) . Hop phosphorylates Stat9E, a homologue of the mammalian transcription factor STAT  that dimerises, translocates to the nucleus and drives target gene expression (Fig. 2). In response to viral infections, JAK/STAT target genes include antiviral effectors such as TurandotM (TotM) and virus-induced RNA-1 (vir-1) [113, 118, 119]. Interestingly, activation of JAK/STAT signalling does not seem to be a general defence mechanism during viral infection, but is induced only in response to specific viruses [112, 113, 119].
Regarding the function of Toll and Imd signalling during antiviral immune responses, mutants of signalling mediators of both pathways have been shown to display increased susceptibility to viral infections. However, the details of receptor activation, virus specificity and number of pathway members involved remains to be elucidated [120,121,122,123]. Further strengthening the role of NF-κB signalling as an important factor during antiviral defence, is the identification of viral suppressors of Toll and Imd signalling in the in the genomes of Kallithea viruses and Invertebrate Iridescent Virus-6 (IIV-6), respectively [124, 125]. Similarly, homologues of a cytokine named Diedel (Die), up-regulated in Drosophila upon certain viral infections and proposed to protect the fly from detrimental consequences by preventing excessive activation of Imd signalling, are encoded by insect DNA viruses, hence indicating an evolved need of viruses to suppress Drosophila NF-κB signalling . When it comes to the caspase-mediated regulation of the RNAi system, the JAK-STAT pathway, and the Imd and Toll pathways in response to viral infection, little is known. However, as Relish mutants display an impaired antiviral immune response [122,123,124], it is tempting to speculate that Dredd, given its role as an activator of Relish, also plays a role in Imd signalling during antiviral defences. Interestingly, in a study conducted by Imler and colleagues, ectopic expression of dSting was shown to prevent viral replication in a Ird5- and Relish-dependent manner. In this study RNAi-mediated silencing of Dredd in S2 cells led to a small increase in Drosophila C virus replication . However, as no definite conclusions of Dredd regulating dSting can be drawn from this study, further in vivo characterization of Dredd mutants upon viral infection are needed to elucidate a potential role of Dredd in the dSting-Relish axis.
Apoptosis modulating Drosophila innate immune defence
In addition to being an efficient eliminator of damaged or unnecessary cells, apoptosis contributes to a well-functioning immune defence and is often induced upon pathogenic infections . Apoptotic cells facilitate their own removal by recruiting phagocytes, leading to the elimination of infected host cells in a controlled manner, and prevention of a possible spread of the infectious agent [129, 130]. Phagocytosis of infected cells contributes to the successful elimination of viruses in both Drosophila and mammals [123, 131, 132]. Upon virus infection in fly cells, apoptosis is induced as a consequence of a decrease in Diap1 levels that leads to the increase of active Dronc and Drice [131, 133]. As phagocytic clearance of virus-infected Drosophila S2 cells has been shown to depend on caspase activation , apoptosis seems to be a trigger of phagocytosis during the Drosophila immune response.
In order to maintain tissue homeostasis upon cell death activation, apoptotic cells induce Dronc-dependent compensatory proliferation of neighbouring healthy cells [51, 134, 135]. Studies performed in the epithelial cells of the imaginal discs, indicate that Dronc would drive apoptosis-induced proliferation  and neoplastic activity [41, 136] by stimulating the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), hence, attracting hemocytes that by cytokine secretion activate epithelial JNK signalling and drive proliferation. An organ naturally subjected to continuous cell turnover is the Drosophila midgut [137, 138]. Enterocyte cell death and caspase activity have been shown to influence intestinal stem cell proliferation and are needed for maintaining homeostatic renewal of cells [25, 139]. Of the Drosophila caspases, Dronc is known to regulate enterocyte turnover and seem to, depending on the cellular setting, be either limiting or driving intestinal stem cell activity [42, 140]. The epithelial turnover itself is affected by the metabolic state of the fly, but also by external factors such as pathogenic bacteria [111, 141,142,143]. Local bacterial insults are associated with increased caspase activity and cell death, as well as with higher amounts of ROS that, although contributing to the elimination of bacteria, also harms the epithelial cells [111, 144]. To overcome the damage inflicted by bacteria, compromised cells produce Upds that activate JAK/STAT signalling, driving compensatory stem cell-mediated proliferation [111, 142, 144]. The function of specific caspases in intestinal epithelial regeneration upon bacterial infection remains unexplored. However, given the role of Dronc as a regulator of epithelial proliferation, it is likely that the caspase also contributes to epithelial regeneration in the Drosophila intestine during local bacterial insults. Indeed, loss-of-function Dark mutants, unable to activate Dronc, were shown to display increased sensitivity to wounding, due to inability of driving caspase activation and tissue regeneration in the midgut .
In addition to Dronc, the effector caspase Drice seems to be activated in the intestinal enterocytes upon bacterial infection. Indeed, effector caspase activation, presumably by Drice, has been used as a marker of apoptosis in the Drosophila midgut post infection [111, 143]. As Drice levels are increased upon bacterial infections, the Drice-Diap2 complex described earlier (Fig. 4), might, besides regulating Diap2 and NF-κB-mediated immune signalling , also play a role in maintaining homeostatic cell turnover by restraining excessive Drice activity, and apoptosis-mediated cell proliferation during steady-state conditions.
Conclusion and future perspective
Since their initial discovery in C. elegans, caspases have been the subject of intense research, both in the field of programmed cell death and as regulators of inflammatory signalling [3, 145]. Although traditionally separated into inflammatory and apoptotic caspases, overlapping functions of the mammalian caspases from both categories have become evident. Inflammatory caspase-1 has, for instance, been shown to engage apoptotic effector caspase-7 in S. typhimurium-infected macrophages , and mammalian caspase-8, best known for its initiating role in the extrinsic apoptotic pathway, is able to regulate the Nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, to cleave proIL-1β and to drive NF-κB signalling during specific cellular conditions . Given their central role in tissue health and homeostasis, caspases serve as interesting targets when tuning inflammatory signalling. In addition, mutations affecting caspases and their signalling pathways are connected to severe autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases [148, 149]. In order to treat these conditions and to find potential therapeutic targets, the cellular mechanisms of caspase regulation and, importantly, the dual function of caspases in cell death and immune defence needs to be elucidated.
Studies done in Drosophila during the last two decades have contributed greatly to our knowledge regarding caspase-mediated regulation of immune signalling and epithelial immunohomeostasis. Although the function of Dredd in the immune response towards Gram-negative bacteria has been elucidated in considerable detail, several questions regarding Dredd as a regulator of innate immunity remain to be addressed. Among these are the function of Dredd during virus immune responses, the role of Dredd-ubiquitination in inflammatory signalling, and whether ubiquitin-patterns vary during septic and local immune responses, and, finally, the involvement of Dredd in the response towards Gram-positive bacteria in the intestinal epithelia. Indeed, the recently reported tissue-specific function of Drice in intestinal immunity , underscores the difference in inflammatory regulation during acute, septic immune responses and local immune responses induced in tissues that are exposed to both resident and pathogenic bacteria during normal life. To expand our understanding of caspase-mediated regulation of the immune defence in the intestinal epithelia, further studies regarding the upstream drivers of Drice activity, and the functions of Dronc during steady-state conditions and in response to bacterial insults, are needed. Finally, as the potential immune-regulatory functions of Strica, Dcp-1, Damm and Decay remain elusive, further characterisation of these caspases will likely provide the field with valuable knowledge regarding caspase-mediated regulation of innate immunity.
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Yang Y, Jiang G, Zhang P, Fan J. Programmed cell death and its role in inflammation. Mil Med Res. 2015;2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-015-0039-0.
Bertheloot D, Latz E, Franklin BS. Necroptosis, pyroptosis and apoptosis: an intricate game of cell death. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:1106–21.
van Opdenbosch N, Lamkanfi M. Caspases in cell death, inflammation, and disease. Immunity. 2019;50:1352–64.
Mace PD, Riedl SJ. Molecular cell death platforms and assemblies. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22:828–36.
Broz P, Dixit VM. Inflammasomes: mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16:407–20.
Ramirez MLG, Salvesen GS. A primer on caspase mechanisms. Semin Cell Developmental Biol. 2018;82:79–85.
Pop C, Salvesen GS. Human caspases: activation, specificity, and regulation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:21777–81.
Parrish AB, Freel CD, Kornbluth S. Cellular mechanisms controlling caspase activation and function. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 2013;5. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a008672.
Verhagen AM, Coulson EJ, Vaux DL. Protein family review Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins and their relatives: IAPs and other BIRPs Gene organization and evolutionary history. Genome Biol. 2001;2:reviews3009.1–3009.10. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2001-2-7-reviews3009.
Gyrd-Hansen M, Meier P. IAPs: From caspase inhibitors to modulators of NF-κB, inflammation and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:561–74.
Kocab AJ, Duckett CS. Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins as intracellular signaling intermediates. FEBS J. 2016;283:221–31.
Jennings BH. Drosophila-a versatile model in biology & medicine. Mater Today. 2011;14:190–5.
Kaufman TC. A short history and description of Drosophila melanogaster classical genetics: Chromosome aberrations, forward genetic screens, and the nature of mutations. Genetics. 2017;206:665–89.
Yamaguchi M, Yoshida H. Drosophila as a model organism. In: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Springer New York LLC, 2018, pp 1–10.
Pandey UB, Nichols CD. Human disease models in drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63:411–36.
Piazza N, Wessells RJ. Drosophila models of cardiac disease. In: Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. Elsevier B.V., 2011, pp 155–210.
Roeder T, Isermann K, Kallsen K, Uliczka K, Wagner C. A Drosophila asthma model - What the fly tells us about inflammatory diseases of the lung. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;710:37–47.
Graham P, Pick L. Drosophila as a Model for Diabetes and Diseases of Insulin Resistance. In: Current Topics in Developmental Biology. Academic Press Inc., 2017, pp 397–419.
Mirzoyan Z, Sollazzo M, Allocca M, Valenza AM, Grifoni D, Bellosta P. Drosophila melanogaster: a model organism to study cancer. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00051.
Apidianakis Y, Rahme LG. Drosophila melanogaster as a model for human intestinal infection and pathology. DMM Dis Models Mechanisms. 2011;4:21–30.
Lemaitre B, Hoffmann J. The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:697–743.
Leulier F, Rodriguez A, Khush RS, Abrams JM, Lemaitre B. The Drosophila caspase Dredd is required to resist Gram-negative bacterial infection. EMBO Rep. 2000;1:353–8.
Meinander A, Runchel C, Tenev T, Chen L, Kim CH, Ribeiro PS, et al. Ubiquitylation of the initiator caspase DREDD is required for innate immune signalling. EMBO J. 2012;31:2770–83.
Kietz C, Mohan AK, Pollari V, Tuominen IE, Ribeiro PS, Meier P, et al. Drice restrains Diap2-mediated inflammatory signalling and intestinal inflammation. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:28–39.
Takeishi A, Kuranaga E, Tonoki A, Misaki K, Yonemura S, Kanuka H, et al. Homeostatic epithelial renewal in the gut is required for dampening a fatal systemic wound response in Drosophila. Cell Reports 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.02.022.
Paquette N, Broemer M, Aggarwal K, Chen L, Husson M, Ertürk-Hasdemir D, et al. Caspase-mediated cleavage, IAP binding, and ubiquitination: linking three mechanisms crucial for Drosophila NF-κB signaling. Mol Cell. 2010;37:172–82.
Stöven S, Ando I, Kadalayil L, Engström Y, Hultmark D. Activation of the Drosophila NF-κB factor Relish by rapid endoproteolytic cleavage. EMBO Rep. 2000;1:347–52.
Troha K, Buchon N. Methods for the study of innate immunity in Drosophila melanogaster. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Dev Biol. 2019;8. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.344.
Cooper D, Eleftherianos I. Memory and specificity in the insect immune system: Current perspectives and future challenges. Front Immunol. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00539.
Bergman P, Seyedoleslami Esfahani S, Engström Y. Drosophila as a Model for Human Diseases—Focus on Innate Immunity in Barrier Epithelia. In: Current Topics in Developmental Biology. Academic Press Inc., 2017, pp 29–81.
Lamkanfi M. Alice in caspase land. A phylogenetic analysis of caspases from worm to man. Cell Death Differ. 2002;9:358–61.
Chen P, Rodriguez A, Erskine R, Thach T, Abrams JM. Dredd, a novel effector of the apoptosis activators reaper, grim, and hid in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1998;201:202–16.
Dorstyn L, Colussi PA, Quinn LM, Richardson H, Kumar S. DRONC, an ecdysone-inducible Drosophila caspase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4307–12.
Vernooy SY, Copeland J, Ghaboosi N, Griffin EE, Yoo SJ, Hay BA. Analysis cell death regulation in Drosophila: conservation of mechanism and unique insights. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:69–76.
Fraser AG, Mccarthy NJ, Evan GI. drICE is an essential caspase required for apoptotic activity in Drosophila cells. EMBO J. 1997;16:6192–9.
Dorstyn L, Read SH, Quinn LM, Richardson H, Kumar S. DECAY, a novel Drosophila caspase related to mammalian caspase-3 and caspase-7*. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:30778–83.
Song Z, Mccall K, Steller H. DCP-1, a Drosophila cell death protease essential for development. Science. 1997;275:536–40.
Hawkins CJ, Yoo SJ, Peterson EP, Wang SL, Vernooy SY, Hay BA. The Drosophila caspase DRONC cleaves following glutamate or aspartate and is regulated by DIAP1, HID, and GRIM. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:27084–93.
Doumanis J, Quinn L, Richardson H, Kumar S. STRICA, a novel Drosophila melanogaster caspase with an unusual serine/threonine-rich prodomain, interacts with DIAP1 and DIAP2. Cell Death Differ. 2001;8:387–94.
Harvey NL, Daish T, Mills K, Dorstyn L, Quinn LM, Read SH, et al. Characterization of the Drosophila Caspase, DAMM. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:25342–50.
Fogarty CE, Diwanji N, Lindblad JL, Tare M, Amcheslavsky A, Makhijani K, et al. Extracellular reactive oxygen species drive apoptosis-induced proliferation via Drosophila Macrophages. Curr Biol. 2016;26:575–84.
Amcheslavsky A, Lindblad JL, Bergmann A. Transiently “Undead” enterocytes mediate homeostatic tissue turnover in the Adult Drosophila Midgut. Cell Rep. 2020;33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108408.
Muro I, Berry DL, Huh JR, Chen CH, Huang H, Yoo SJ, et al. The Drosphila caspase lce is importance for many apoptotic cell deaths and for spermatid individualization, a nonapoptotic process. Development. 2006;133:3305–15.
Hay BA, Guo M. Caspase-dependent cell death in Drosophila. Annu Rev Cell Developmental Biol. 2006;22:623–50.
Meier P, Silke J, Leevers SJ, Evan GI. The Drosophila caspase DRONC is regulated by DIAP1. EMBO J. 2000;19:598–611.
Chai J, Yan N, Huh JR, Wu JW, Li W, Hay BA, et al. Molecular mechanism of Reaper-Grim-Hid-mediated suppression of DIAP1-dependent Dronc ubiquitination. Nat Struct Biol. 2003;10:892–8.
Zachariou A, Tenev T, Goyal L, Agapite J, Steller H, Meier P. IAP-antagonists exhibit non-redundant modes of action through differential DIAP1 binding. EMBO J. 2003;22:6642–52.
Yu X, Wang L, Acehan D, Wang X, Akey CW. Three-dimensional structure of a double apoptosome formed by the Drosophila apaf-1 related killer. J Mol Biol. 2006;355:577–89.
Quinn LM, Dorstyn L, Mills K, Colussi PA, Chen P, Coombe M, et al. An essential role for the caspase Dronc in developmentally programmed cell death in Drosophila. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:40416–24.
Ditzel M, Broemer M, Tenev T, Bolduc C, Lee TV, Rigbolt KTG, et al. Inactivation of effector caspases through nondegradative polyubiquitylation. Mol Cell. 2008;32:540–53.
Kondo S, Senoo-Matsuda N, Hiromi Y, Miura M. DRONC coordinates cell death and compensatory proliferation. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:7258–68.
Xu D, Wang Y, Willecke R, Chen Z, Ding T, Bergmann A. The effector caspases drICE and dcp-1 have partially overlapping functions in the apoptotic pathway in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:1697–706.
Huh JR, Foe I, Muro I, Chun HC, Jae HS, Soon JY, et al. The Drosophila inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) DIAP2 is dispensable for cell survival, required for the innate immune response to Gram-negative bacterial infection, and can be negatively regulated by the Reaper/Hid/Grim family of IAP-binding apoptosis inducers. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:2056–68.
Leulier F, Lhocine N, Lemaitre B, Meier P. The Drosophila inhibitor of apoptosis protein DIAP2 functions in innate immunity and is essential to resist gram-negative bacterial infection. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:7821–31.
Gesellchen V, Kuttenkeuler D, Steckel M, Pelte N, Boutros M. An RNA interference screen identifies Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein 2 as a regulator of innate immune signalling in Drosophila. EMBO Rep. 2005;6:979–84.
Kleino A, Valanne S, Ulvila J, Kallio J, Myllymäki H, Enwald H, et al. Inhibitor of apoptosis 2 and TAK1-binding protein are components of the Drosophila Imd pathway. EMBO J. 2005;24:3423–34.
Ribeiro PS, Kuranaga E, Tenev T, Leulier F, Miura M, Meier P. DIAP2 functions as a mechanism-based regulator of drICE that contributes to the caspase activity threshold in living cells. J Cell Biol. 2007;179:1467–80.
González I, Busturia A. High levels of dRYBP induce apoptosis in drosophila imaginal cells through the activation of reaper and the requirement of trithorax, dredd and dFADD. Cell Res. 2009;19:747–57.
Hu S, Yang X. dFADD, A novel death domain-containing adapter protein for the Drosophila caspase DREDD. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:30761–4.
Öztürk S, Schleich K, Lavrik IN. Cellular FLICE-like inhibitory proteins (c-FLIPs): Fine-tuners of life and death decisions. Exp Cell Res. 2012;318:1324–31.
Ivanisenko NV, Buchbinder JH, Espe J, Richter M, Bollmann M, Hillert LK, et al. Delineating the role of c-FLIP/NEMO interaction in the CD95 network via rational design of molecular probes. In: BMC Genomics. BioMed Central Ltd., 2019 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5539-y.
Shinoda N, Hanawa N, Chihara T, Koto A, Miura M. Dronc-independent basal executioner caspase activity sustains Drosophila imaginal tissue growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:20539–44.
Vlisidou I, Wood W. Drosophila blood cells and their role in immune responses. FEBS J. 2015;282:1368–82.
Vanha-aho LM, Valanne S, Rämet M. Cytokines in Drosophila immunity. Immunol Lett. 2016;170:42–51.
Bronkhorst AW, van Rij RP. The long and short of antiviral defense: Small RNA-based immunity in insects. Curr Opin Virol. 2014;7:19–28.
Obbard DJ, Gordon KHJ, Buck AH, Jiggins FM. The evolution of RNAi as a defence against viruses and transposable elements. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2009;364:99–115.
Swevers L, Liu J, Smagghe G. Defense mechanisms against viral infection in Drosophila: RNAi and non-RNAi. Viruses. 2018;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10050230.
Pham LN, Dionne MS, Shirasu-Hiza M, Schneider DS. A specific primed immune response in Drosophila is dependent on phagocytes. PLoS Pathogens 2007;3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0030026.
Tassetto M, Kunitomi M, Andino R. Circulating immune. Cells Mediat a Systemic Rna-Based Adapt Antivir Response Drosoph Cell. 2017;169:314–25.e13.
Choe KM, Werner T, Stöven S, Hultmark D, Anderson K. Requirement for a peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP) in relish activation and antibacterial immune responses in Drosophila. Science (1979). 2002;296:359–62.
Gottar M, Gobert V, Michel T, Belvin M, Duyk G, Hoffmann JA, et al. The Drosophila immune response against Gram-negative bacteria is mediated by a peptidoglycan recognition protein. Nature. 2002;416:640–4.
Rämet M, Manfruelli P, Pearson A, Mathey-Prevot B, Ezekowitz RA. Functional genomic analysis of phagocytosis and identification of a Drosophila receptor for E. coli. Nature. 2002;416:644–8.
Takehana A, Katsuyama T, Yano T, Oshima Y, Takada H, Aigaki T, et al. Overexpression of a pattern-recognition receptor, peptidoglycan-recognition protein-LE, activates imdrelish-mediated antibacterial defense and the prophenoloxidase cascade in Drosophila larvae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:13705–10.
Mellroth P, Karlsson J, Håkansson J, Schultz N, Goldman WE, Steiner H. Ligand-induced dimerization of Drosophila peptidoglycan recognition proteins in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:6455–60.
Georgel P, Naitza S, Kappler C, Ferrandon D, Zachary D, Swimmer C, et al. Drosophila immune deficiency (IMD) is a death domain protein that activates antibacterial defense and can promote apoptosis. Developmental Cell. 2001;1:503–14.
Choe KM, Lee H, Anderson K. Drosophila peptidoglycan recognition protein LC (PGRP-LC) acts as a signal-transducing innate immune receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:1122–6.
Naitza S, Rossé C, Kappler C, Georgel P, Belvin M, Gubb D, et al. The Drosophila immune defense against gram-negative infection requires the death protein dFADD. Immunity. 2002;17:575–81.
Ertürk-Hasdemir D, Broemer M, Leulier F, Lane WS, Paquette N, Hwang D, et al. Two roles for the Drosophila IKK complex in the activation of Relish and the induction of antimicrobial peptide genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:9779–84.
Kim CH, Paik D, Rus F, Silverman N. The caspase-8 homolog Dredd cleaves Imd and relish but is not inhibited by p35. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:20092–101.
Rutschmann S, Jung AC, Zhou R, Silverman N, Hoffmann JA, Ferrandon D. Role of Drosophila IKKγ in a Toll-independent antibacterial immune response. Nat Immunol. 2000;1:342–7.
Silverman N, Zhou R, Stöven S, Pandey N, Hultmark D, Maniatis T. A Drosophila IκB kinase complex required for relish cleavage and antibacterial immunity. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2461–71.
Aalto AL, Mohan AK, Schwintzer L, Kupka S, Kietz C, Walczak H, et al. M1-linked ubiquitination by LUBEL is required for inflammatory responses to oral infection in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:860–76.
Broderick NA. Friend, foe or food? Recognition and the role of antimicrobial peptides in gut immunity and drosophila-microbe interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biol Sci. 2016;371. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0295.
Davis MM, Engström Y. Immune response in the barrier epithelia: Lessons from the fruit fly drosophila melanogaster. J Innate Immun. 2012;4:273–83.
Gottar M, Gobert V, Matskevich AA, Reichhart J-M, Wang C, Butt TM, et al. Dual detection of fungal infections in Drosophila through recognition of microbial structures and sensing of virulence factors. Cell. 2006;127:1425–37.
Wang L, Weber ANR, Atilano ML, Filipe SR, Gay NJ, Ligoxygakis P. Sensing of Gram-positive bacteria in Drosophila: GNBP1 is needed to process and present peptidoglycan to PGRP-SA. EMBO J. 2006;25:5005–14.
Jang IH, Chosa N, Kim SH, Nam HJ, Lemaitre B, Ochiai M, et al. A Spätzle-processing enzyme required for toll signaling activation in drosophila innate immunity. Developmental Cell. 2006;10:45–55.
Weber ANR, Tauszig-Delamasure S, Hoffmann JA, Lelièvre E, Gascan H, Ray KP, et al. Binding of the Drosophila cytokine Spätzle to Toll is direct and establishes signaling. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:794–800.
Sun H, Bristow BN, Qu G, Wasserman SA. A heterotrimeric death domain complex in Toll signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12871–6.
Tauszig-Delamasure S, Bilak H, Capovilla M, Hoffmann JA, Imler JL. Drosophila MyD88 is required for the response to fungal and Gram-positive bacterial infections. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:91–7.
Daigneault J, Klemetsaune L, Wasserman SA. The IRAK Homolog Pelle Is the Functional Counterpart of IκB Kinase in the Drosophila Toll Pathway. PLoS ONE 2013; 8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075150.
Meng X, Khanuja BS, Ip YT. Toll receptor-mediated Drosophila immune response requires Dif, an NF-B factor. Genes Dev. 1999;13:792–7.
Reichhart JM, Georgel P, Meister M, Lemaitre B, Kappler C, Hoffamnn JA. Expression and nuclear translocation of the rel/NF-kappa B-related morphogen dorsal during the immune response of Drosophila. Comptes rendus de l’Academie des Sci Ser III, Sci de la vie. 1993;316:1218–24.
Ming M, Obata F, Kuranaga E, Miura M. Persephone/Spätzle pathogen sensors mediate the activation of toll receptor signaling in response to endogenous danger signals in apoptosis-deficient Drosophila. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:7558–68.
Horng T, Medzhitov R. Drosophila MyD88 is an adapter in the Toll signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:12654–8.
Delaney JR, Stöven S, Uvell H, Anderson K, Engström Y, Mlodzik M. Cooperative control of Drosophila immune responses by the JNK and NF-κB signaling pathways. EMBO J. 2006;25:3068–77.
Tafesh-Edwards G, Eleftherianos I. JNK signaling in Drosophila immunity and homeostasis. Immunol Lett. 2020;226:7–11.
Sluss HK, Han Z, Barrett T, Davis RJ, Ip YTA. JNK signal transduction pathway that mediates morphogenesis and an immune response in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1996;10:2745–58.
Takatsu Y, Nakamura M, Stapleton M, Danos MC, Matsumoto K, O’connor MB, et al. TAK1 participates in c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling during Drosophila development. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:3015–26.
Kallio J, Leinonen A, Ulvila J, Valanne S, Ezekowitz RA, Rämet M. Functional analysis of immune response genes in Drosophila identifies JNK pathway as a regulator of antimicrobial peptide gene expression in S2 cells. Microbes Infect. 2005;7:811–9.
Zhai Z, Boquete JP, Lemaitre B. Cell-Specific Imd-NF-κB responses enable simultaneous antibacterial immunity and intestinal epithelial cell shedding upon bacterial infection. Immunity. 2018;48:897–910.e7.
Park JM, Brady H, Ruocco MG, Sun H, Williams DA, Lee SJ, et al. Targeting of TAK1 by the NF-κB protein Relish regulates the JNK-mediated immune response in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 2004;18:584–94.
Zhou R, Silverman N, Hong M, Liao DS, Chung Y, Chen ZJ, et al. The role of ubiquitination in Drosophila innate immunity. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:34048–55.
Guntermann S, Foley E. The protein Dredd is an essential component of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway in the Drosophila immune response. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:30284–94.
Schneider J, Imler JL. Sensing and signalling viral infection in drosophila. Dev Comparative Immunol. 2021;117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2020.103985.
Slavik KM, Morehouse BR, Ragucci AE, Zhou W, Ai X, Chen Y, et al. cGAS-like receptors sense RNA and control 3′2′-cGAMP signalling in Drosophila. Nature. 2021;597:109–13.
Holleufer A, Winther KG, Gad HH, Ai X, Chen Y, Li L, et al. Two cGAS-like receptors induce antiviral immunity in Drosophila. Nature. 2021;597:114–8.
Raftery N, Stevenson NJ. Advances in anti-viral immune defence: revealing the importance of the IFN JAK/STAT pathway. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74:2525–35.
Bang IS. JAK/STAT signaling in insect innate immunity. Entomological Res. 2019;49:339–53.
Agaisse H, Petersen UM, Boutros M, Mathey-Prevot B, Perrimon N. Signaling role of hemocytes in Drosophila JAK/STAT-dependent response to septic injury. Dev Cell. 2003;5:441–50.
Buchon N, Broderick NA, Poidevin M, Pradervand S, Lemaitre B. Drosophila intestinal response to bacterial infection: activation of host defense and stem cell proliferation. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;5:200–11.
Myllymäki H, Rämet M. JAK/STAT pathway in Drosophila immunity. Scand J Immunol. 2014;79:377–85.
Kemp C, Mueller S, Goto A, Barbier V, Paro S, Bonnay F, et al. Broad RNA interference–mediated antiviral immunity and virus-specific inducible responses in Drosophila. J Immunol. 2013;190:650–8.
Wright VM, Vogt KL, Smythe E, Zeidler MP. Differential activities of the Drosophila JAK/STAT pathway ligands Upd, Upd2 and Upd3. Cell Signal. 2011;23:920–7.
Brown S, Hu N, Castelli-Gair Hombría J, Castelli J, Hombría G. Identification of the first invertebrate interleukin JAK/STAT receptor, the Drosophila gene domeless. Curr Biol. 2001;11:1700–5.
Binari R, Perrimon N. Stripe-Specific regulation of pair-rule;enes by hopscotch, a putative Jak amily tyrosine kinase in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1994;8:300–12.
Hou XS, Melnick MB, Perrimon N. marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and encodes a protein similar to the mammalian STATs. Cell. 1996;84:411–9.
Dostert C, Jouanguy E, Irving P, Troxler L, Galiana-Arnoux D, Hetru C, et al. The Jak-STAT signaling pathway is required but not sufficient for the antiviral response of drosophila. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:946–53.
West C, Silverman N. p38b and JAK-STAT signaling protect against Invertebrate iridescent virus 6 infection in Drosophila. PLoS Pathogens. 2018;14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007020.
Zambon RA, Nandakumar M, Vakharia VN, Wu LP. The Toll pathway is important for an antiviral response in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:7257–62.
Ferreira ÁG, Naylor H, Esteves SS, Pais IS, Martins NE, Teixeira L. The Toll-Dorsal pathway is required for resistance to viral oral infection in Drosophila. PLoS Pathogens. 2014;10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004507.
Avadhanula V, Weasner BP, Hardy GG, Kumar JP, Hardy RW. A novel system for the launch of alphavirus RNA synthesis reveals a role for the Imd pathway in arthropod antiviral response. PLoS Pathogens. 2009;5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000582.
Costa A, Jan E, Sarnow P, Schneider D. The Imd pathway is involved in antiviral immune responses in Drosophila. PLoS ONE. 2009;4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007436.
Palmer WH, Joosten J, Overheul GJ, Jansen PW, Vermeulen M, Obbard DJ, et al. Induction and suppression of NF-κB signalling by a DNA virus of Drosophila. J Virol. 2019;93:1443–61.
West C, Rus F, Chen Y, Kleino A, Gangloff M, Gammon DB, et al. IIV-6 inhibits NF-ΚB responses in drosophila. Viruses. 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11050409.
Lamiable O, Kellenberger C, Kemp C, Troxler L, Pelte N, Boutros M, et al. Cytokine Diedel and a viral homologue suppress the IMD pathway in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:698–703.
Goto A, Okado K, Martins N, Cai H, Barbier V, Lamiable O, et al. The kinase IKKβ regulates a STING- and NF-κB-dependent antiviral response pathway in Drosophila. Immunity. 2018;49:225–.e4.
Duprez L, Wirawan E, vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P. Major cell death pathways at a glance. Microbes Infect. 2009;11:1050–62.
Naderer T, Fulcher MC. Targeting apoptosis pathways in infections. J Leukoc Biol. 2018;103:275–85.
Poon IKH, Lucas CD, Rossi AG, Ravichandran KS. Apoptotic cell clearance: basic biology and therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:166–80.
Nainu F, Tanaka Y, Shiratsuchi A, Nakanishi Y. Protection of insects against viral infection by apoptosis-dependent phagocytosis. J Immunol. 2015;195:5696–706.
Nainu F, Shiratsuchi A, Nakanishi Y. Induction of apoptosis and subsequent phagocytosis of virus-infected cells as an antiviral mechanism. Front. Immunol. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01220.
Settles EW, Friesen PD. Flock House virus induces apoptosis by depletion of Drosophila inhibitor-of-apoptosis protein DIAP1. J Virol. 2008;82:1378–88.
Huh JR, Guo M, Hay BA. Compensatory proliferation induced by cell death in the Drosophila Wing Disc requires activity of the apical cell death caspase Dronc in a nonapoptotic role. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1262–6.
Fogarty CE, Bergmann A. Killers creating new life: Caspases drive apoptosis-induced proliferation in tissue repair and disease. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24:1390–400.
Pérez E, Lindblad JL, Bergmann A. Tumor-promoting function of apoptotic caspases by an amplification loop involving ROS, macrophages and JNK in Drosophila. elife. 2017. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26747.001.
Micchelli CA, Perrimon N. Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium. Nature. 2006;439:475–9.
Ohlstein B, Spradling A. The adult Drosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2006;439:470–4.
Liang J, Balachandra S, Ngo S, O’Brien LE. Feedback regulation of steady-state epithelial turnover and organ size. Nature. 2017;548:588–91.
Arthurton L, Nahotko DA, Alonso J, Wendler F, Baena-Lopez LA. Non-apoptotic caspase activation preserves Drosophila intestinal progenitor cells in quiescence. EMBO Rep. 2020;21. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948892.
O’Brien LE, Soliman SS, Li X, Bilder D. Altered modes of stem cell division drive adaptive intestinal growth. Cell. 2011;147:603–14.
Jiang H, Patel PH, Kohlmaier A, Grenley MO, McEwen DG, Edgar BA. Cytokine/Jak/Stat signaling mediates regeneration and homeostasis in the drosophila midgut. Cell. 2009;137:1343–55.
Apidianakis Y, Pitsouli C, Perrimon N, Rahme L. Synergy between bacterial infection and genetic predisposition in intestinal dysplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:20883–8.
Buchon N, Broderick NA, Chakrabarti S, Lemaitre B. Invasive and indigenous microbiota impact intestinal stem cell activity through multiple pathways in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 2009;23:2333–44.
Yuan J, Shaham S, Ledoux S, Ellis HM, Horvitzt RH. The C. elegans cell death gene ced-3 encodes a protein similar to mammalian interleukin-1 beta-converting enzyme. Cell. 1993;75:641–52.
Lamkanfi M, Kanneganti TD, van Damme P, vanden Berghe T, Vanoverberghe I, Vandekerckhove J, et al. Targeted peptidecentric proteomics reveals caspase-7 as a substrate of the caspase-1 inflammasomes. Mol Cell Proteom. 2008;7:2350–63.
Gurung P, Kanneganti TD. Novel roles for caspase-8 in IL-1β and inflammasome regulation. Am J Pathol. 2015;185:17–25.
Meynier S, Rieux-Laucat F. FAS and RAS related Apoptosis defects: From autoimmunity to leukemia. Immunological Rev. 2019;287:50–61.
van Gorp H, van Opdenbosch N, Lamkanfi M. Inflammasome-dependent cytokines at the crossroads of health and autoinflammatory disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a028563.
We acknowledge all our colleagues whose important work could not be cited due to space limitations.
The authors were supported by The Academy of Finland Project (#321850), the InFLAMES Flagship Programme of the Academy of Finland (#337531), the Academy of Finland strategic research profiling area Solutions for Health at Åbo Akademi University (#336355), the Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation, and the Swedish Cultural Foundation. Open access funding provided by Abo Akademi University (ABO).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by F Pentimalli
About this article
Cite this article
Kietz, C., Meinander, A. Drosophila caspases as guardians of host-microbe interactions. Cell Death Differ 30, 227–236 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-022-01038-4
This article is cited by
Cell Death & Differentiation (2023)