Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Breast cancer dependence on MCL-1 is due to its canonical anti-apoptotic function


High levels of the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family member MCL-1 are frequently found in breast cancer and, appropriately, BH3-mimetic drugs that specifically target MCL-1’s function in apoptosis are in development as anti-cancer therapy. MCL-1 also has reported non-canonical roles that may be relevant in its tumour-promoting effect. Here we investigate the role of MCL-1 in clinically relevant breast cancer models and address whether the canonical role of MCL-1 in apoptosis, which can be targeted using BH3-mimetic drugs, is the major function for MCL-1 in breast cancer. We show that MCL-1 is essential in established tumours with genetic deletion inducing tumour regression and inhibition with the MCL-1-specific BH3-mimetic drug S63845 significantly impeding tumour growth. Importantly, we found that the anti-tumour functions achieved by MCL-1 deletion or inhibition were completely dependent on pro-apoptotic BAX/BAK. Interestingly, we find that MCL-1 is also critical for stem cell activity in human breast cancer cells and high MCL1 expression correlates with stemness markers in tumours. This strongly supports the idea that the key function of MCL-1 in breast cancer is through its anti-apoptotic function. This has important implications for the future use of MCL-1-specific BH3-mimetic drugs in breast cancer treatment.


The BCL-2 family regulates mitochondrial integrity to ensure appropriate activation of programmed cell death (CD) in response to developmental or physiological cues. This is achieved through balanced protein:protein interactions between pro- and anti-apoptotic family members that regulate the activation of BAX/BAK. Active BAX and BAK permeabilise the mitochondrial outer membrane leading to the release of mitochondrial intermembrane space proteins that trigger caspase activation and CD [1]. Evasion of CD is considered a hallmark of cancer, and apoptosis represents a major barrier to cellular transformation and oncogenic progression [2]. Resistance to apoptosis in cancer can be achieved through disruption in the balance of BCL-2 proteins to enhance pro-survival functions. The paradigm for this is aberrant BCL-2 expression through chromosomal translocation in follicular lymphoma though increased anti-apoptotic BCL-2 protein expression occurs across diverse cancer types through mechanisms including gene amplification, increased transcription or translation and protein stability [3, 4]. Apoptotic sensitivity can be restored by chemical mimicry of the pro-apoptotic BCL-2 proteins with so-called BH3-mimetic drugs. Neutralisation of elevated pro-survival BCL-2 family members has demonstrable clinical impact in cancer; venetoclax (ABT199) is a BCL-2-specific BH3-mimetic that has single-agent and combinatorial efficacy in some types of lymphoma and BH3-mimetic drugs are now in clinical trials for a range of cancers [5,6,7,8].

BH3-mimetic drugs that specifically target MCL-1 have been developed and entered clinical trials for the treatment of haematopoietic malignancies. In addition to its prominent role in haematopoietic cancers, MCL-1 has emerged as a key player in breast cancer with high levels of MCL-1 protein in primary breast cancer samples correlating with poor patient prognosis [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. There are compelling data showing that targeting MCL-1 represents a therapeutic opportunity in breast cancer with model systems revealing that breast cancer may be dependent on MCL-1, and that MCL-1 inhibition can enhance the effect of conventional cancer therapies [9,10,11,12, 16,17,18,19]. Importantly, numerous non-apoptotic roles for MCL-1 have also been described that may also be relevant to cancer. These include regulation of mitochondrial dynamics, oxidative phosphorylation, reactive oxygen species, autophagy, pluripotency, long chain fatty acid synthesis and the DNA damage response [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Importantly, not all of these functions can be blocked by BH3-mimetic drugs implying that additional approaches to target MCL-1 may be required for maximal therapeutic impact (reviewed in [29]). Addressing this key point, we set out to determine whether fully established tumours in an immune competent breast cancer model were dependent on MCL-1 and, if so, whether this was due to anti-apoptotic MCL-1 activity and/or its non-apoptotic functions.

We find that acute genetic deletion or pharmaceutical targeting of MCL-1 significantly impedes the growth of established MMTV-PyMT mammary tumours in vivo. Crucially, this oncogenic function of MCL-1 was completely dependent upon its anti-apoptotic function because loss of pro-apoptotic BAX and BAK completely prevented the effect of MCL-1 loss. Importantly, MCL-1 was required for breast cancer stem cell function in vitro and this was also due to MCL-1’s canonical anti-apoptotic function since it could be ablated by deletion of BAX/BAK and targeted with MCL-1-specific BH3-mimetic drugs. These data strongly support the premise of MCL-1 inhibition as an adjunct to breast cancer therapy and highlight that the major role of MCL-1 in breast cancer is via inhibition of apoptosis.


MCL-1 is required for tumour maintenance in vivo

Having previously demonstrated an essential genetic requirement for MCL-1 in tumour development in the MMTV-PyMT mammary model we wanted to mimic therapeutic targeting of MCL-1 in an adjuvant setting by determining the impact of Mcl1 deletion in established tumours [16]. MMTV-PyMT mice were crossed with RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1fl/+ mice and cohorts aged until mammary tumours reached 5 mm diameter at which time ubiquitous deletion of one allele of Mcl1 was achieved by tamoxifen administration and tumour growth monitored until clinical endpoint (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, inactivation of just one allele of Mcl1 in these mice (denoted HET), at a time when palpable tumours had already established, was sufficient to restrict tumour growth and significantly extend survival (Fig. 1B). Importantly, the total tumour burden for mice wild type (WT) and HET for Mcl1 was comparable at endpoint despite HET mice surviving significantly longer (Fig. 1C and Supplementary Fig. 1A). Having shown that acute deletion of just one allele of Mcl1 impedes the growth of established tumours in vivo we investigated the impact of targeting both alleles of Mcl1. To circumvent lethality due to the requirement for MCL-1 in haematopoietic stem cells and cardiomyocytes, we used a tumour fragment transplantation system where MMTV-PyMT tumours harbouring either WT or floxed alleles of Mcl1 are transplanted into syngeneic recipients prior to tamoxifen-activated CRE-ERT2 recombination (Fig. 1D) [22, 23, 30]. In this way, fragments of WT and Mcl1fl/fl (MCL-1 proficient) tumours were engrafted into the mammary fat pad of multiple WT recipients and allowed to establish before tamoxifen induction to delete both alleles of Mcl1 in Mcl1fl/fl tumours. Remarkably, homozygous Mcl1 deletion induced tumour regression in 8/9 Mcl1fl/fl tumours but no WT tumour regressed (Fig. 1E). This tumour-repressive effect of Mcl1 deletion was sustained and median survival increased from 47 to 91 days (P = 0.0022) relative to WT controls with 4/9 recipients of Mcl1fl/fl tumours surviving long term with no palpable tumour remaining (Fig. 1F). In contrast, tumour growth and survival of WT and Mcl1fl/fl tumours was similar in the absence of active CRE (Supplementary Fig. 1B, C). Together these results reveal that MCL-1 is an essential gene in established tumours and that targeting MCL-1 at clinically actionable stages of tumour development can result in tumour regression with long-term impact on survival.

Fig. 1: MCL-1 is required for MMTV-PyMT tumour maintenance in vivo.

A Diagram of experimental set-up for results presented in B, C. Female MMTV-PyMT mice were monitored until the largest tumour reached 5 mm diameter, induced with tamoxifen (day 0 on graph) for 4 consecutive days (to induce recombination in mice carrying RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1fl/+ alleles) and monitored until clinical endpoint. B Kaplan–Meier survival graph of mice WT for Mcl1 (n = 9) (median survival 18 days) and HET (n = 7) (median survival 23 days) post tamoxifen induction (P = 0.0424). Log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. Genotypes of WT mice were 2× MMTV-PyMT;RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1+/+;RosaLSL-RFP, 4× MMTV-PyMT;Mcl1fl/+;RosaLSL-RFP and 3× MMTV-PyMT;Mcl1fl/fl;RosaLSL-RFP, genotypes of seven HET mice were MMTV-PyMT;RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1fl/+;RosaLSL-RFP. C Total tumour weight at endpoint of mice shown in B. WT (n = 9), HET (n = 7), n.s. not significant, unpaired t test. D Diagram of experimental set-up for results presented in E, F (see also Supplementary Fig. 1). Tumours were harvested from three ‘Mcl1WT’ (genotypes were MMTV-PyMT;RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1+/+;RosaLSL-RFP/MMTV-PyMT;Mcl1fl/+;RosaLSL-RFP/MMTV-PyMT;Mcl1fl/fl;RosaLSL-RFP) and 3 ‘Mcl1fl/fl’ (genotypes were 2× MMTV-PyMT;RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1fl/fl;RosaLSL-RFP and 1× MMTV-PyMT;RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1fl/fl) donor mice and tumour fragments orthotopically transplanted into multiple FVB recipients (ten recipients of Mcl1WT fragments and nine recipients of Mcl1fl/fl fragments). Transplanted tumours were monitored until ~5 mm diameter before tamoxifen-induced CRE-ERT2 activation. E Change in tumour volume 3 weeks post Mcl1 deletion. Error bars represent mean ± SD, ***P = 0.0009 unpaired t test. Red dotted line indicates 100% of starting volume (i.e., no change). No Mcl1WT tumours regressed and 8/9 Mcl1fl/fl tumours regressed following CRE activation. F Kaplan–Meier survival curve of mice carrying tumours shown in (E). Median survival Mcl1WT 47 days, Mcl1fl/fl 91 days post tamoxifen induction P = 0.0022 Log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test.

MCL-1 inhibition significantly impedes growth of MMTV-PyMT tumours in vivo

Our genetic models of acute Mcl1 deletion provide strong rationale for MCL-1 as a therapeutic target in established breast cancers. Recent pharmaceutical advances have led to the development of BH3-mimetic MCL-1 inhibitors suitable for in vivo use [17, 31,32,33]. We therefore wished to further model targeting MCL-1 in a breast cancer therapy setting and test whether inhibition of MCL-1 with a BH3-mimetic drug would impact on clinically palpable mammary tumours. To this end, we used a syngeneic orthotopic transplantation model (Fig. 2A, MMTV-PyMT;CRISPR/Cas9 control cells described in Supplementary Fig. 2A). When tumours reached 5 mm diameter, recipient mice were randomly assigned to vehicle or MCL-1 inhibitor (S63845) groups and underwent twice weekly treatment for 3 weeks. MCL-1 inhibition with S63845 led to a significant impairment of tumour growth (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Fig. 2B) with reduction in post-treatment tumour weight to around one third when compared to vehicle treated controls (mean of 636 mg down to 184 mg, P = 0.0112, Fig. 2C). Interestingly, once weekly treatment with 25 mg/kg S63845 with or without the conventional chemotherapeutic doxetaxel did not restrict expansion of MMTV-PyMT tumour cells in vivo. This suggests that prolonged inhibition of MCL-1 is required for a therapeutic effect and cannot be significantly substituted by conventional chemotherapy in this setting (Supplementary Fig. 2C, D). Thus, at appropriate dosing regimens, pharmaceutical targeting of MCL-1 with BH3-mimetics such as S63845 can act as a single-agent therapy to slow tumour growth in a syngeneic mouse model of breast cancer.

Fig. 2: MCL-1 inhibition restricts growth of established MMTV-PyMT tumours in vivo.

A Diagram of experimental set-up for results presented in B, C. MMTV-PyMT cell line (CRISPR/Cas9 control, described in Supplementary Fig. 2) was injected into mammary fat pad of FVB recipients and tumours were allowed to grow to ~5 mm before assignment to vehicle or S63845 treatment groups. S63845 treatment was at 25 mg/kg IV twice per week for 3 weeks and tumour volume monitored. B Tumour growth is suppressed upon treatment with S63845, individual tumours were measured thrice weekly and points represent weekly mean ± SE. Vehicle control (n = 7) mice and S63845 (n = 10) mice. C Tumour weight at end of experiment following 3 weeks of vehicle (n = 7) or S63845 treatment (n = 10). Graph shows mean ± SD, unpaired t test. *P = 0.0112.

Breast cancer dependency on MCL-1 is lost in the absence of BAX and BAK

Non-apoptotic functions for MCL-1 have been described in cardiomyocytes, pluripotent stem cells, breast cancer stem cells and neurons [13, 21,22,23, 26,27,28]. To determine whether the conventional anti-apoptotic role of MCL-1 was responsible for mammary tumour sensitivity to MCL-1 loss/inhibition we deleted Bax and Bak to bypass the canonical anti-apoptotic function of MCL-1 (regulation of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization). Following orthologous transplant of Bax/Bak CRISPR/Cas9 edited MMTV-PyMT cells into WT recipients, tumours were allowed to grow to 5 mm diameter before treatment with MCL-1 inhibitor S63845 or vehicle control (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Figs. 2A and 3A). Strikingly, in tumours that had been engineered for BAX/BAK deficiency, S63845 treatment had no impact on tumour growth (Fig. 3B). This is in contrast to the pronounced impact of S63845 we observed in the paired BAX/BAK-proficient MMTV-PyMT cells (Fig. 2B, C and Supplementary Fig. 2A). Whilst we had shown that Mcl1 deletion can result in long-term tumour suppression (Fig. 1F), genetic deletion of Mcl1 had no effect on tumour growth in BAX/BAK-deficient tumours (Fig. 3C–E) and unlike BAX/BAK-proficient MMTV-PyMT tumours, decreased MCL-1 expression was still apparent in the context of BAX/BAK loss (Fig. 3F and Supplementary Fig. 3B–D) [16].

Fig. 3: MCL-1 dependence requires BAX/BAK.

A Diagram of experimental set-up for results presented in B. MMTV-PyMT CRISPR/Cas9 Bax/Bak cell line (derivation described in Supplementary Fig. 2A) was injected into mammary fat pad of FVB recipients and tumours allowed to grow to ~5 mm before assignment to vehicle or S63845 treatment groups. S63845 treatment was at 25 mg/kg IV twice per week for 3 weeks. B Mean tumour weight of mice described in A, following 3 weeks of vehicle control (n = 7) or S63845 (n = 7) treatment (25 mg/kg IV twice per week) is shown (±SD), n.s. not significant unpaired t test. C Diagram of experimental set-up for results presented in DF. MMTV-PyMT; CRISPR/Cas9 Bax/Bak tumour cell line (as used in A, B, this cell line carries RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1fl/fl alleles that were not activated in A, B, derivation described in Supplementary Fig. 2A) was injected into mammary fat pad of FVB recipients and tumours allowed to grow to ~5 mm before assignment to vehicle or tamoxifen groups (tamoxifen induces CRE-ERT2-mediated deletion of Mcl1fl/fl); therefore, vehicle treated tumours will be MCL-1 proficient and tamoxifen-induced tumours (TAM) will be MCL-1 deficient. Tumour size was monitored by calliper measurement thrice weekly until harvesting at predefined ethical endpoint (15 mm diameter). D Points indicate individual tumour weights at endpoint, vehicle control (n = 5) or tamoxifen (n = 5). Error bars represent mean ± SD, n.s. not significant unpaired t test. E Kaplan–Meier graph showing tumour-related survival of mice shown in D. Day 0 indicates vehicle/tamoxifen induction (at tumour diameter ~5 mm). Mcl1 deletion in established tumours does not alter survival when Bax/Bak have been CRISPR/Cas9 targeted. Vehicle control (n = 5) or tamoxifen (n = 5). P = 0.2482 Log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. F Western blot quantification shows sustained decrease in MCL-1 from endpoint tumours shown in D, E. Tumour material sampled for western blot will include host-derived (WT for Mcl1) stroma and donor-derived tumour epithelium. MCL-1 expression is calculated relative to β-actin control for each sample, each point represents an individual tumour and error bars represent mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, unpaired t test. Western blots shown in Supplementary Fig. 3B.

MCL-1 is essential for MMTV-PyMT cancer stem cell viability

Previous studies have grouped human breast cancer cell lines into MCL-1-dependent and MCL-1-independent groups based on in vitro sensitivity to MCL-1 inhibition or knockdown in 2D monolayer assays [9, 12, 34]. To our surprise, the dramatic impact of loss or inhibition of MCL-1 in MMTV-PyMT tumours that we observed in vivo was not recapitulated in vitro with acute deletion of MCL-1 in cell lines derived from MMTV-PyMT primary tumours (hereafter referred to as tumour cell lines) (Fig. 4A, B and Supplementary Fig. 4A). Moreover, treatment with the MCL-1-specific BH3-mimetic drug S63845 alone failed to overtly affect viability when tumour cell lines were maintained in 2D monolayers (Fig. 4B and Supplementary Fig. 4A). In 2D culture these tumour cell lines are however still dependent on pro-survival BCL-2 proteins as combined targeting of MCL-1 (genetically or pharmaceutically with S63845) and BCL-2/BCL-XL (with ABT737) resulted in high, but variable, levels of CD (Fig. 4B, also observed in an additional independently derived tumour cell line in Supplementary Fig. 4A). Parsing of the relative contribution of BCL-2 and BCL-XL with additional BH3-mimetic drugs ABT199 (BCL-2 specific) and WEHI536 (BCL-XL specific) revealed that together with MCL-1, BCL-XL (rather than BCL-2) is required for tumour cell line monolayer viability and this is not due to compensatory upregulation of BCL-XL in the absence of MCL-1 (Fig. 4A, C).

Fig. 4: MCL-1 is essential for MMTV-PyMT breast cancer stem cells.

A Western blot showing impact of CRE activation on MCL-1 and BCL-XL expression in a cell line from MMTV-PyMT;RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1fl/fl tumour. CRE activated in vitro with 100 nM 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), samples harvested after 72 h. MCL-1 is efficiently deleted, BCL-XL level is not increased. B Genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of MCL-1 does not inhibit tumour cell line viability in 2D culture. Mcl1 deletion induced with 100 nM 4-OHT at time of plating, medium changed 24 h later and 1 μM of indicted BH3-mimetic drugs added for an additional 24 h before quantification of cell death as expressed by Sytox/Confluence. Cells plated in triplicate wells and repeated three times. Graph shows mean ± SD, no significant differences as determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction for multiple comparisons. Cell line derived from MMTV-PyMT;RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1fl/fl tumour. C MMTV-PyMT cell lines show co-dependence on MCL-1 and BCL-XL in 2D culture. Induction of Mcl1 deletion with 100 nM 4-OHT at time of plating, medium changed 24 h later and 1 μM of indicted BH3-mimetic drugs added for a further 24 h prior to determining viability by Sytox/Confluence. Cells plated in triplicate, for three experiments, data points represent mean of individual experiments (two independent cell lines from MMTV-PyMT;RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1fl/fl tumours contributed to these data points (lines 3.1j and 5.1e with 5.1e being tested twice). Graph shows mean ± SD, **P < 0.01 determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction for multiple comparisons. D MCL-1 deletion or inhibition impairs cancer stem cell activity. MMTV-PyMT cell lines were plated as single-cell suspensions in a tumoursphere assay and inducer/inhibitor (4-OHT or A1210477) added at time of plating. CRE-ERT2 was activated in vitro with 100 nM 4-OHT (‘CRE activation’) to delete Mcl1 in Mcl1fl/fl, cells or MCL-1 inhibited with 1 µM A1210477 at time of plating. Tumoursphere count on day 7 is expressed as percentage relative to untreated control. Points represent mean tumoursphere count relative to control condition for each cell line. WT tumour cell line (3.3 h) is MMTV-PyMT;RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1+/+, experiment was set up a total of four independent times with 4-OHT and A1210477 treatment carried out on three of those repeats. Mcl1fl/fl data points come from two independent MMTV-PyMT;RosaCRE-ERT2;Mcl1fl/fl tumour cell lines, line 3.1j was set up with 4-OHT five independent times and A1210477 treatment carried out on three of those repeats and line 5.1e was set up four independent times with 4-OHT and A1210477 treatment carried out two repeats. Graph shows mean ± SE. **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA analysis with Tukey’s correction for multiple comparisons.

In contrast to the indifference of these tumour cell lines to MCL-1 deletion or inhibition in 2D adherent culture, there was a strong effect in 3D-tumoursphere culture. An important role for MCL-1 in breast cancer stem cells has been suggested and we reasoned that the bulk of cells growing in vitro in monolayers might not represent the cells driving tumour maintenance in vivo such as cancer stem cells [13]. To address this, a tumoursphere assay in non-adherent culture was utilised that is known to reflect breast cancer stem cell activity [35]. This revealed a strong genetic requirement for MCL-1 in breast cancer stem cells (Fig. 4D), which was pharmacologically confirmed using the MCL-1-specific BH3-mimetic drug A1210477 (Fig. 4D). Therefore, whilst MCL-1 may be dispensable for bulk MMTV-PyMT cell culture in 2D monolayer, it is essential for growth of breast cancer stem cells in vitro.

MCL-1 is required for human breast cancer stemness via BAX/BAK

Given the profound requirement for MCL-1 in tumours and cancer stem cells in the mouse MMTV-PyMT model, we wished to interrogate the relevance of these findings to human breast cancer. The MDA-MB-231 human triple-negative breast cancer cell line shows properties of breast cancer stem cells but in 2D monolayer is insensitive to loss or inhibition of MCL-1 [9, 12, 34]. Intriguingly, we found that in tumoursphere assay conditions MDA-MB-231 cells were highly sensitive to MCL-1 inhibition with BH3-mimetic drugs A1210477 and S63845 (Supplementary Fig. 5A). To further test the requirement for canonical MCL-1 function in human breast cancer stem cells we therefore used CRISPR/Cas9 editing to generate MCL1-, BAX/BAK- and MCL1/BAX/BAK-deficient versions of the human breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cell line (Supplementary Fig. 5B). As expected, genetic targeting of MCL-1 was tolerated without impacting on viability when these cell lines were maintained in 2D culture ([9, 12, 34] and data not shown). MDA-MB-231 control cells were highly sensitive to MCL-1 inhibition with S63845 in the tumoursphere assay and MCL1-deficient cells were unable to form tumourspheres in vitro confirming a specific role for MCL-1 in breast cancer stem cell function (Fig. 5A). Importantly, this was completely restored upon co-deletion of BAX/BAK (Fig. 5A). The ability of MCL-1 inhibitor S63845 to restrict human breast cancer stem cell growth was also negated in the absence of BAX/BAK, clearly illustrating the importance of canonical anti-apoptotic MCL-1 function in breast cancer stem cells (Fig. 5A). Together with our experiments utilising mouse models, these data reveal that MCL-1 function in breast cancer stem cells in vitro and in tumour survival in vivo is due to its anti-apoptotic function that is targetable by BH3-mimetic drugs.

Fig. 5: MCL-1 dependence requires BAX/BAK.

A Tumoursphere assay with indicated CRISPR/Cas9-modified MDA-MB-231 cell lines, 1 µM S63845 was added at time of plating and spheres were counted at day 7. Points represent independent experiments expressed as % tumoursphere formation relative to untreated BAX/BAK-deficient control. Bars represent mean ± SD of three biological replicates. One-way ANOVA analysis with Tukey’s correction for multiple comparisons. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, n.s. not significant. B Correlation of MCL1 expression with, SNAI2, VIM, CDH3, CD44 and ALDH1A1 across TCGA breast cancers (979 tumours [52]). *Pearson correlation P < 0.05. ER-negative status indicated by black bar in top row. C Comparison of VIM, SNAI2, CDH3 and ALDH1A1 expression in low MCL1 (lower quartile) and high MCL1 (upper quartile) with ER status indicated (red dots for ER-negative, blue dots for ER-positive tumours) TCGA dataset as in B.

In order to probe whether MCL-1 might be specifically associated with breast cancer stemness across human breast cancers we examined a number of tumour gene expression datasets. Importantly, MCL-1 expression was found to be significantly correlated with stemness markers SNAI2, VIM, CDH3, CD44 and ALDH1A1 (Fig. 5B and Supplementary Fig. 5C, E, F). Splitting tumours into MCL1-low and MCL1-high groups confirmed that these stemness markers have elevated expression in MCL1-high tumours, which were also significantly enriched for ER-negative tumours (Fig. 5C and Supplementary Fig. 5D). Similar results were also found for three other datasets, representing a combined total of over 9000 breast tumours (Supplementary Fig. 5C–F). Together, these data suggest that MCL-1 may be an important player in maintaining stem cell populations of primary breast cancers.


In this study we provide evidence that targeting MCL-1 could have therapeutic impact in established breast cancers and show that the mechanism of breast cancer dependence on MCL-1 is through its canonical anti-apoptotic function that can be targeted by MCL-1-specific BH3-mimetics.

MCL-1 inhibitors are in clinical development with a focus on haematopoietic cancers including multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia [36]. Using genetic methods, we have previously shown that MCL-1 is required for tumour development in a mouse model of breast cancer and a number of groups have shown the importance of MCL-1 for breast cancer cell line survival in vitro through genetic and pharmaceutical targeting [9,10,11,12]. Despite these encouraging findings, pharmaceutical targeting of MCL-1 as a single agent has proved inefficient at restricting breast cancer growth in vivo when investigated with xenograft and PDX models in immunodeficient mice [18, 19]. MCL-1 is known to play essential roles in a number of haematopoietic cell types [37]. Moreover, MCL-1-specific BH3-mimetic drugs can have higher affinity for human versus mouse MCL-1 meaning that xenograft studies may show efficient BH3-mimetic engagement of MCL-1 in the human-derived tumour at a given dose, whilst insufficiently targeting MCL-1 within the tumour microenvironment. Anti-tumour effects of MCL-1 inhibition could also occur through pro-tumour immune cell depletion and cancer associated fibroblasts and such contributions to tumour suppression may only emerge in homologous experimental systems [38, 39]. Here, using genetic and pharmaceutical methods on mouse tumours in immune proficient mice, we find that targeting MCL-1 can have single-agent inhibitory effect on mammary tumour growth of established mammary tumours. Preclinical studies demonstrating the therapeutic effect of targeting MCL-1 in haematopoietic tumours have supported the clinical application of MCL-1-specific BH3-mimetics: genetic deletion of Mcl1 potently restricts tumour expansion and enhances survival in mouse models of AML, B-cell lymphoma and T-cell lymphoma [40,41,42]. The utility of targeting MCL-1 alone in solid tumours was recently demonstrated in lung adenocarcinoma where deletion of Mcl1 restricted tumour development and treatment with S63845 shown to delay tumour progression in vivo [43]. Together with the present study, this validates the further investigation of drugs targeting MCL-1 in solid tumours.

In vivo dosing of S63845 at 25 mg/kg, unlike complete Mcl1 deletion, is well tolerated by normal tissues and our study suggests a therapeutic window for efficacy of MCL-1 inhibitors in the clinic. In line with this, acute induction of whole body Mcl1 haploid loss restrained the growth of established mammary tumours and extended survival. Furthermore, homozygous loss of Mcl1, specifically in the tumour epithelium, provoked tumour regression and allowed long-term tumour-free survival. It is worth noting that the context in which we find single-agent effect of S63845 in vivo has both an intact immune system and utilised higher dosing of S63845 (twice weekly 25 mg/kg v once weekly 25 mg/kg) when compared to related xenograft studies that saw no effect of S63845 alone but pronounced effects upon combination with docetaxel, trastuzumab or olaparib [18, 19]. We did not see this combination effect in an MMTV-PyMT allograft mouse model with once weekly S63845 and docetaxel. Given the lower potency of S63845 for mouse versus human MCL-1 it may be possible that the therapeutic index is underestimated in this context [17]. Therefore, the tumour suppressive effects of S63845 observed here could be due to increased frequency of dosing and/or a combination of tumour cell and microenvironment effects, and future studies will address the contribution of these factors [39]. It is also possible that whilst non-canonical functions of MCL-1 are not critical in the MMTV-PyMT model, these roles are required in the xenograft models tested previously.

In contrast to its critical role in MMTV-PyMT tumour growth in vivo, we were intrigued by the dispensability of Mcl1 for tumour cell line growth in 2D monolayers in vitro where cell viability was jointly maintained by MCL-1 and BCL-XL. As a role for MCL-1 has been suggested in breast cancer stem cells we investigated growth in tumourspheres, known to measure breast cancer stem cell activity. Despite indifference to loss or inhibition of MCL-1 in 2D culture, the impact of targeting MCL-1 in a tumoursphere assay was dramatic that suggests that the biological relevance of targeting MCL-1 in vivo may be underestimated by interpretation of human breast cancer cell line 2D culture [9, 12, 34].

The impact of acute homozygous Mcl1 deletion in fully developed mammary tumours was notable with regression occurring in almost all mice and long-term tumour-free survival achieved in 4/9 cases. Intriguingly, we found that tumour regression was more penetrant with genetic deletion of MCL-1 rather than pharmaceutical inhibition. This could indicate a non-apoptotic function of MCL-1 that is not inhibited using BH3-mimetic drugs such as increased mitochondrial respiration by an inner-membrane localised form of MCL-1 [13, 21]. We therefore investigated the ability of MCL-1 deletion to suppress MMTV-PyMT tumour growth when the downstream apoptotic effectors BAX/BAK were reduced. In this context there was no effect of MCL-1 loss on tumour growth indicating that the requirement for MCL-1 in sustained tumour growth is due to its known anti-apoptotic function within the BCL-2 family. This is supported by tumoursphere assays, indicative of breast cancer stemness, where using either human or mouse tumour cells we found that MCL-1 inhibition with BH3-mimetic drugs completely recapitulated the effect of MCL-1 deletion. Furthermore, reduction in BAX/BAK ablated the negative impact of both genetic and pharmaceutical targeting of MCL-1 in breast cancer stem cells. Together these data reveal that the pro-tumour role of MCL-1 in established breast cancer is predominantly due to its function in apoptosis regulation within the BCL-2 family. Whilst other non-apoptotic roles of MCL-1 could still be important in breast cancer, its function within the BCL-2 family is crucial and can be targeted by MCL-1-specific BH3-mimetic drugs in development for clinical use. Breast cancer stem cells are known to be responsible for recurrence and resistance to therapy; therefore, the requirement for MCL-1 in breast cancer stem cell activity, the regression of established tumours upon loss of MCL-1 and the association between high MCL1 and stemness markers across a range of breast cancer patients indicate that targeting MCL-1 could be harnessed to improve breast cancer outcome.

Materials and methods

Mice and in vivo treatments

Animals were housed in a barriered facility proactive in environmental enrichment. All work was carried out in line with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the EU Directive 2010 and was sanctioned by the local ethical review process (University of Glasgow). RosaCRE-ERT2, MMTV-PyMT, Mcl1tm3Sjk (Mcl1fl/fl) (The Jackson Laboratory, ME, USA), and ROSA-tdRFP mice (acquired from the European Mouse Mutant Archive) and have all been described previously [44,45,46,47]. All mice had been backcrossed >10 generations FVB/N and all controls were littermates. Mice were monitored two to three times per week for tumour development. Tumour growth was monitored by calliper measurement three times per week, by staff blinded to outcome, and volume calculated using the equation ([length × width2]/2). Clinical endpoint was 15 mm diameter, at endpoint, mice were euthanized and tumours and lungs weighed. For orthologous tumour fragment transplant experiments single tumours were harvested from GEMM, washed in PBS and chopped by scalpel into 2 mm fragments immediately prior to transplantation into the fourth mammary fat pad of 7- to 10-week-old female FVB/N recipients (Charles River, UK). For orthologous transplantation of cell lines, 0.5 million cells in 50 µl 1:1 PBS:matrigel mix were transplanted into the fourth mammary fat pad of 7- to 10-week-old female FVB/N recipients (Charles River, UK). In vivo induction of CRE-ERT2 was achieved with tamoxifen (Sigma) 10 mg/ml stock in 200 µl sunflower seed oil by IP injection for 4 consecutive days. For in vivo dosing, S63845 (Active Biochem) was prepared as described [48] in 2% vitamin E/d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (Sigma) immediately prior to IV administration by tail vein injection at 25 mg/kg and docetaxel (Merck) was dissolved in PBS and administered by intraperitoneal injection at 7.5 mg/kg. Mice were allocated to treatment arms when tumour diameter reached ~5 mm and distributed into treatment arms to match mean tumour volume in a non-random manner. Sample sizes were based on our previous experience with these models.

Cell lines and in vitro assays

MDA-MB-231 cells used in this study are the MDA-MB-231-luc-D3H2LN line (Covance), cell lines were authenticated and confirmed negative for mycoplasma by the Molecular and Advanced Technologies service at the Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing was achieved using LentiCRISPRv2 backbone (Addgene #52961) with guide sequences: murine BAX: 5′-CAACTTCAACTGGGGCCGCG-3′ and BAK: 5′-GCGCTACGACACAGAGTTCC-3′; human BAX: 5′-AGTAGAAAAGGGCGACAACC-3′, BAK: 5′-GCCATGCTGGTAGACGTGTA-3′ and MCL1: 5’-GTATCACAGACGTTCTCGTA-3’. Lentiviral production, cell infection and selection were performed as previously described [49]. Cell lines were not cloned and pooled populations used in all experiments. For dual targeting of Bax/Bak in murine cells viral supernatant from LentiCRISPRv2_puro_ Bak was applied to target cells at 46 and 70 h post transfection being sequentially replaced with viral supernatant from LentiCRISPRv2_blasti_ Bax at 56 and 80 h post transfection. Co-selection with 1 µg/ml puromycin and 10 µg/ml blasticidine commenced at 94 h with selection media being replaced every 2–3 days for 1 week until all cells in uninfected control plates (puromycin, blasticidine and puromycin + blasticidine conditions) had died. For triple targeting of MCL1/BAX/BAK in human cells, blasticidine encoding vectors for BAX/BAK were used as described above to first generate BAX/BAK knockout line. The procedure was then repeated with LentiCRISPRv2_puro_ MCL1 to derive MCL1/ BAX/BAK triple targeted lines. Empty vector LentiCRISPRv2_blasti_ and LentiCRISPRv2_puro were used for control lines. All experiments were performed using <20 passage cells. For MMTV-PyMT cell line derivation, tumours were excised, washed in PBS, then finely chopped by scalpel prior to washing and seeding in media comprised of DMEM, 10% FBS, 2 µM L-glutamine, 50 U/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin (all Life Technologies), 5 µg/ml insulin (Life Technologies), 10 ng/ml EGF (Sigma) and 10 ng/ml cholera toxin. Primary tumour cells were considered cell lines following five successive passages as monolayers. In vitro induction of CRE-ERT2 was achieved with 100 nM 4-hydroxytamoxifen treatment prior to cell seeding for each experiment. YEJ2.1g-iRFP cells are an FVB MMTV-PyMT cell line that has been transduced with pBABE_iRFP_IRES_puro [50].

For tumoursphere assay single-cell suspension was prepared and 1000 cells plated per well in ultra-low attachment 24 well plates (Corning) in DMEM, 2 µM L-glutamine, 50 U/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 1X B27 (all Gibco, UK), 20 ng/ml EGF, 20 ng/ml FGF2 and 4 µg/ml Heparin (all Sigma) and tumourspheres >100 μm counted 7 days later. For viability assays 15,000 cells/well were seeded in 24 well plates and the following day the indicated treatments were added along with SYTOX Green (Invitrogen, UK) and imaged by Incucyte FLR (Essen Bioscience, UK). CD at 24 h post treatment was calculated using the equation CDtreatment/CDbasal where CDtreatment is SYTOX Green cells/cell confluence following 24 h treatment and CDbasal is SYTOX Green cells/cell confluence in control samples at 0 h. BH3-mimetics for in vitro experiments were ABT737, ABT199, WEHI539, A1210477 and S63845 (all ApexBio, UK). In vitro cell lysates for western blot were prepared in RIPA buffer with HALT Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (both Thermo Scientific, UK) and tumour lysates prepared from excised tumour fragments in the same buffer using a Precellys homogeniser according to manufacturer’s instructions (Bertin, France). Proteins were resolved by western blot on NuPage Bis-Tris 4–12% gradient gels (Invitrogen, UK) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham, UK). Blots were probed with antibodies to MCL-1 (94296), BCL-XL (2762), BAX (2772), BAK (12105) α-TUBULIN (2125) (all Cell Signaling, UK) and β-ACTIN (A4700) (Sigma, UK). Secondary antibodies were IRDye 800CW Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG or IRDye 680RD Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (Li-cor) and visualised using a Li-cor Odyssey CLx. For immunohistochemistry antibodies to BAX (14796) and MCL-1 (94296) (Cell Signaling, UK) were used with Vectastain ABC (Vector Laboratories) used in conjunction with MCL-1 staining.

Gene expression analysis

Levels of MCL1 and a range of marker genes were assessed in publicly available gene expression datasets. Data for METABRIC [51] and TCGA [52] were downloaded from c-Bioportal, data from the SCAN-B [53] study were extracted from NCBI GEO using accession GSE96058 and the Cb17 dataset was generated as a compendium of 2999 breast tumours from 17 Affymetrix studies integrated with batch correction as described previously [54].

Statistical analysis

Sample size (n) is indicated in the figure legends. Statistical significance between two experimental groups was calculated by unpaired t test, two-tailed and multiple experimental groups by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction for multiple comparisons using GraphPad Prism version 6.0c (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). Kaplan–Meier survival curves of tumour-related survival were also plotted using GraphPad Prism version 6.0c and Mantel–Cox (Log-rank). Centre values on graphs are mean or median values and error bars are standard deviation or standard error of the mean as detailed for each graph in the figure legend.


  1. 1.

    Bock FJ, Tait SWG. Mitochondria as multifaceted regulators of cell death. Nat Rev Mol cell Biol. 2020;21:85–100.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Campbell KJ, Tait SWG. Targeting BCL-2 regulated apoptosis in cancer. Open Biol. 2018;8:180002.

  4. 4.

    Tsujimoto Y, Finger LR, Yunis J, Nowell PC, Croce CM. Cloning of the chromosome breakpoint of neoplastic B cells with the t(14;18) chromosome translocation. Science. 1984;226:1097–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Merino D, Kelly GL, Lessene G, Wei AH, Roberts AW, Strasser A. BH3-mimetic drugs: blazing the trail for new cancer medicines. Cancer Cell. 2018;34:879–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Souers AJ, Leverson JD, Boghaert ER, Ackler SL, Catron ND, Chen J, et al. ABT-199, a potent and selective BCL-2 inhibitor, achieves antitumor activity while sparing platelets. Nat Med. 2013;19:202–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, Kahl BS, Puvvada SD, Gerecitano JF, et al. Targeting BCL2 with venetoclax in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:311–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Seymour JF, Ma S, Brander DM, Choi MY, Barrientos J, Davids MS, et al. Venetoclax plus rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:230–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Xiao Y, Nimmer P, Sheppard GS, Bruncko M, Hessler P, Lu X, et al. MCL-1 is a key determinant of breast cancer cell survival: validation of MCL-1 dependency utilizing a highly selective small molecule inhibitor. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14:1837–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Williams MM, Lee L, Hicks DJ, Joly MM, Elion D, Rahman B, et al. Key survival factor, Mcl-1, correlates with sensitivity to combined Bcl-2/Bcl-xL blockade. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15:259–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Young AI, Law AM, Castillo L, Chong S, Cullen HD, Koehler M, et al. MCL-1 inhibition provides a new way to suppress breast cancer metastasis and increase sensitivity to dasatinib. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18:125.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Goodwin CM, Rossanese OW, Olejniczak ET, Fesik SW. Myeloid cell leukemia-1 is an important apoptotic survival factor in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22:2098–106.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee KM, Giltnane JM, Balko JM, Schwarz LJ, Guerrero-Zotano AL, Hutchinson KE, et al. MYC and MCL1 cooperatively promote chemotherapy-resistant breast cancer stem cells via regulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Cell Metab. 2017;26:633–47.e7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Balko JM, Giltnane JM, Wang K, Schwarz LJ, Young CD, Cook RS, et al. Molecular profiling of the residual disease of triple-negative breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy identifies actionable therapeutic targets. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:232–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Leverson JD, Zhang H, Chen J, Tahir SK, Phillips DC, Xue J, et al. Potent and selective small-molecule MCL-1 inhibitors demonstrate on-target cancer cell killing activity as single agents and in combination with ABT-263 (navitoclax). Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1590.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Campbell KJ, Dhayade S, Ferrari N, Sims AH, Johnson E, Mason SM, et al. MCL-1 is a prognostic indicator and drug target in breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kotschy A, Szlavik Z, Murray J, Davidson J, Maragno AL, Le Toumelin-Braizat G, et al. The MCL1 inhibitor S63845 is tolerable and effective in diverse cancer models. Nature. 2016;538:477–82.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Merino D, Whittle JR, Vaillant F, Serrano A, Gong JN, Giner G, et al. Synergistic action of the MCL-1 inhibitor S63845 with current therapies in preclinical models of triple-negative and HER2-amplified breast cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaam7049.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Annunziato S, de Ruiter JR, Henneman L, Brambillasca CS, Lutz C, Vaillant F, et al. Comparative oncogenomics identifies combinations of driver genes and drug targets in BRCA1-mutated breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2019;10:397.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jamil S, Mojtabavi S, Hojabrpour P, Cheah S, Duronio V. An essential role for MCL-1 in ATR-mediated CHK1 phosphorylation. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:3212–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Perciavalle RM, Stewart DP, Koss B, Lynch J, Milasta S, Bathina M, et al. Anti-apoptotic MCL-1 localizes to the mitochondrial matrix and couples mitochondrial fusion to respiration. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:575–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Thomas RL, Roberts DJ, Kubli DA, Lee Y, Quinsay MN, Owens JB, et al. Loss of MCL-1 leads to impaired autophagy and rapid development of heart failure. Genes Dev. 2013;27:1365–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang X, Bathina M, Lynch J, Koss B, Calabrese C, Frase S, et al. Deletion of MCL-1 causes lethal cardiac failure and mitochondrial dysfunction. Genes Dev. 2013;27:1351–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Demelash A, Pfannenstiel LW, Liu L, Gastman BR. Mcl-1 regulates reactive oxygen species via NOX4 during chemotherapy-induced senescence. Oncotarget. 2017;8:28154–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Escudero S, Zaganjor E, Lee S, Mill CP, Morgan AM, Crawford EB, et al. Dynamic regulation of long-chain fatty acid oxidation by a noncanonical interaction between the MCL-1 BH3 helix and VLCAD. Mol Cell. 2018;69:729–43.e7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rasmussen ML, Kline LA, Park KP, Ortolano NA, Romero-Morales AI, Anthony CC, et al. A non-apoptotic function of MCL-1 in promoting pluripotency and modulating mitochondrial dynamics in stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;10:684–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rasmussen ML, Taneja N, Neininger AC, Wang L, Robertson GL, Riffle SN, et al. MCL-1 inhibition by selective BH3 mimetics disrupts mitochondrial dynamics causing loss of viability and functionality of human cardiomyocytes. iScience. 2020;23:101015.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Anilkumar U, Khacho M, Cuillerier A, Harris R, Patten DA, Bilen M, et al. MCL-1(Matrix) maintains neuronal survival by enhancing mitochondrial integrity and bioenergetic capacity under stress conditions. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:321.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wu X, Luo Q, Liu Z. Ubiquitination and deubiquitination of MCL1 in cancer: deciphering chemoresistance mechanisms and providing potential therapeutic options. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:556.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Opferman JT, Iwasaki H, Ong CC, Suh H, Mizuno S, Akashi K, et al. Obligate role of anti-apoptotic MCL-1 in the survival of hematopoietic stem cells. Science. 2005;307:1101–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Caenepeel S, Brown SP, Belmontes B, Moody G, Keegan KS, Chui D, et al. AMG 176, a selective MCL1 inhibitor, is effective in hematologic cancer models alone and in combination with established therapies. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:1582–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ramsey HE, Fischer MA, Lee T, Gorska AE, Arrate MP, Fuller L, et al. A novel MCL1 inhibitor combined with venetoclax rescues venetoclax-resistant acute myelogenous leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:1566–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tron AE, Belmonte MA, Adam A, Aquila BM, Boise LH, Chiarparin E, et al. Discovery of Mcl-1-specific inhibitor AZD5991 and preclinical activity in multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5341.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Petrocca F, Altschuler G, Tan SM, Mendillo ML, Yan H, Jerry DJ, et al. A genome-wide siRNA screen identifies proteasome addiction as a vulnerability of basal-like triple-negative breast cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2013;24:182–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ponti D, Costa A, Zaffaroni N, Pratesi G, Petrangolini G, Coradini D, et al. Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties. Cancer Res. 2005;65:5506–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wei AH, Roberts AW, Spencer A, Rosenberg AS, Siegel D, Walter RB, et al. Targeting MCL-1 in hematologic malignancies: rationale and progress. Blood Rev. 2020;44:100672.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Opferman JT, Kothari A. Anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members in development. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:37–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Dzhagalov I, St John A, He YW. The antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 is essential for the survival of neutrophils but not macrophages. Blood. 2007;109:1620–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Louault K, Bonneaud TL, Séveno C, Gomez-Bougie P, Nguyen F, Gautier F, et al. Interactions between cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor cells promote MCL-1 dependency in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Oncogene. 2019;38:3261–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Glaser SP, Lee EF, Trounson E, Bouillet P, Wei A, Fairlie WD, et al. Anti-apoptotic Mcl-1 is essential for the development and sustained growth of acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Dev. 2012;26:120–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kelly GL, Grabow S, Glaser SP, Fitzsimmons L, Aubrey BJ, Okamoto T, et al. Targeting of MCL-1 kills MYC-driven mouse and human lymphomas even when they bear mutations in p53. Genes Dev. 2014;28:58–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Grabow S, Delbridge AR, Valente LJ, Strasser A. MCL-1 but not BCL-XL is critical for the development and sustained expansion of thymic lymphoma in p53-deficient mice. Blood. 2014;124:3939–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Munkhbaatar E, Dietzen M, Agrawal D, Anton M, Jesinghaus M, Boxberg M, et al. MCL-1 gains occur with high frequency in lung adenocarcinoma and can be targeted therapeutically. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4527.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hameyer D, Loonstra A, Eshkind L, Schmitt S, Antunes C, Groen A, et al. Toxicity of ligand-dependent Cre recombinases and generation of a conditional Cre deleter mouse allowing mosaic recombination in peripheral tissues. Physiol Genomics. 2007;31:32–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Guy CT, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ. Induction of mammary tumors by expression of polyomavirus middle T oncogene: a transgenic mouse model for metastatic disease. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:954–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Opferman JT, Letai A, Beard C, Sorcinelli MD, Ong CC, Korsmeyer SJ. Development and maintenance of B and T lymphocytes requires antiapoptotic MCL-1. Nature. 2003;426:671–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Luche H, Weber O, Nageswara Rao T, Blum C, Fehling HJ. Faithful activation of an extra-bright red fluorescent protein in “knock-in” Cre-reporter mice ideally suited for lineage tracing studies. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37:43–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Brennan MS, Chang C, Tai L, Lessene G, Strasser A, Dewson G, et al. Humanized Mcl-1 mice enable accurate preclinical evaluation of MCL-1 inhibitors destined for clinical use. Blood. 2018;132:1573–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lopez J, Bessou M, Riley JS, Giampazolias E, Todt F, Rochegue T, et al. Mito-priming as a method to engineer Bcl-2 addiction. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10538.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hock AK, Lee P, Maddocks OD, Mason SM, Blyth K, Vousden KH. iRFP is a sensitive marker for cell number and tumor growth in high-throughput systems. Cell Cycle. 2014;13:220–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Curtis C, Shah SP, Chin SF, Turashvili G, Rueda OM, Dunning MJ, et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature. 2012;486:346–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70.

  53. 53.

    Vallon-Christersson J, Häkkinen J, Hegardt C, Saal LH, Larsson C, Ehinger A, et al. Cross comparison and prognostic assessment of breast cancer multigene signatures in a large population-based contemporary clinical series. Sci Rep. 2019;9:12184.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Moleirinho S, Chang N, Sims AH, Tilston-Lunel AM, Angus L, Steele A, et al. KIBRA exhibits MST-independent functional regulation of the Hippo signaling pathway in mammals. Oncogene. 2013;32:1821–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank the Core Services, Molecular and Advanced Technologies at the Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute (C596/A17196) with particular thanks to the Biological Services Unit and Histology. We thank the European Mouse Mutant Archive (EMMA) and Hans Jorg Fehling for mice, Jim O’Prey and Joel Riley for generous sharing of reagents, members of the Tait and Blyth labs for discussion and input, Adiba Khan for artwork, Laura Galbraith and Catherine Winchester for critical reading of the manuscript.


This work was funded by a Breast Cancer Now pilot grant 2014MaySP321 (KB, KJC) and the Chief Scientist Office Breast Cancer Now project grant 2015NovSPR589 (SWGT, KJC, KB), the Wellcome Trust [204820/Z/16/Z] (KJC), CRUK core funding to KB (A29799) and CRUK Programme Foundation Award to SWGT (A20145).

Author information




Conceptualisation: KJC, SWGT, KB; data curation: KJC, AHS; formal analysis: KJC, AHS; funding acquisition: KJC, SWGT, KB; investigation: KJC, SMM, MLW, CC, AHS; methodology: KJC, SMM, HL, RBEW, NR, SD, AHS; project administration: KJC, SWGT, KB; resources: EMMA, HJF, JOP, JR; software: AHS; supervision: KJC, SWGT, KB; validation: KJC; visualisation: KJC, MLW, AHS, AK; writing (original draft): KJC; writing (review and editing): KJC, SWGT, KB, CW, LG.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kirsteen J. Campbell or Stephen W. G. Tait.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

In line with the EU Directive 2010/63/eu and Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, project licences 70/8645 and PP6345023 have been approved to KB to carry out animal studies described herein. All work was approved by the University of Glasgow Animal Welfare and Ethics Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Edited by C. Borner

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campbell, K.J., Mason, S.M., Winder, M.L. et al. Breast cancer dependence on MCL-1 is due to its canonical anti-apoptotic function. Cell Death Differ (2021).

Download citation


Quick links