Abstract
Cancer treatment remains a significant challenge due to issues such as acquired resistance to conventional therapies and the occurrence of adverse treatment-related toxicities. In recent years, researchers have turned their attention to the microbial world in search of novel and effective drugs to combat this devastating disease. Microbial derived secondary metabolites have proven to be a valuable source of biologically active compounds, which exhibit diverse functions and have demonstrated potential as treatments for various human diseases. The exploration of these compounds has provided valuable insights into their mechanisms of action against cancer cells. In-depth studies have been conducted on clinically established microbial metabolites, unraveling their anticancer properties, and shedding light on their therapeutic potential. This review aims to comprehensively examine the anticancer mechanisms of these established microbial metabolites. Additionally, it highlights the emerging therapies derived from these metabolites, offering a glimpse into the immense potential they hold for anticancer drug discovery. Furthermore, this review delves into approved treatments and major drug candidates currently undergoing clinical trials, focusing on specific molecular targets. It also addresses the challenges and issues encountered in the field of anticancer drug research and development. It also presents a comprehensive exposition of the contemporary panorama concerning microbial metabolites serving as a reservoir for anticancer agents, thereby illuminating their auspicious prospects and the prospect of forthcoming strides in the domain of cancer therapeutics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The use of microorganisms to find new drugs for human diseases has been a recurring practice for the past century. Following the discovery of penicillin from Penicillium mold in the 20th century, thousands of bacteria and fungi strains were screened for new antibacterial antibiotics. The impact of these discoveries on humankind has been revolutionary, life expectancy was increased by nearly 30 years in the past century alone [1]. These breakthroughs can be attributed to two factors of microbial world: the sheer abundance of different microbial species, as well as these microorganisms providing a rich source of bioactive compounds that are produced by these organisms. The identification of approximately 22,500 bioactive compounds derived from microbes have led to the development of modern therapeutics beyond antibiotics [2]. Further exploration of these promising therapeutic compounds led to the discovery of novel set of bioactive molecules, which possess potential pharmacological properties.
Microbial metabolites comprise two main categories: primary and secondary. Primary metabolites are synthesized continuously, as they are vital for survival and important cellular processes including growth, development, and proliferation [3, 4]. For each of these processes primary metabolites can serve as signaling molecules, catalysts, stimulators, or inhibitors [2]. In contrast, secondary metabolites are not essential for survival or cellular function, rather are produced to confer an advantage to the organism in its environment. Secondary metabolites can serve as a chemical defense against environmental stressors or improve resource uptake [3,4,5]. Though typically dispensable to the organism that produces these molecules, many microbial derived-secondary metabolites have been discovered to have vast therapeutic application in humans [2]. Numerous secondary microbial metabolites have emerged as a significant reservoir for the production of antibiotics, antivirals, analgesics, and notably innovative anticancer therapies. Many synthetically developed cancer therapies are inspired by the secondary metabolites produced by microorganisms. In this review we will highlight the source and possible function of these compounds, the mechanism of action in mitigating cancer progression, as well as any limitations or challenges in the usage microbially derived metabolites as a treatment of cancer.
Clinically established anticancer microbial metabolites
By 1990, biologically active natural products comprised a significant portion of available pharmaceuticals [6]. This included several microbial metabolites discovered to have antineoplastic effects [7]. These compounds, known for their strong cytotoxic capabilities, have become an integral part of treatment for various types of cancers in modern medicine. In this section we comprehensively describe the mechanism of action and any associated toxicities of DNA intercalators (actinomycin D, inotuzumab ozogamicin), topoisomerase II inhibitors (doxorubicin), DNA crosslinkers (mitomycin C), proteasome inhibitors (carfilzomib), nucleoside analogs (pentostatin), DNA free radical inducers (bleomycins). The anticancer signaling cascades of these compounds are further described in Fig. 1.
Actinomycin D
Actinomycin D, or dactinomycin is an antineoplastic antibiotic derived from Streptomyces parvulus [8]. The compound has demonstrated some bacteriostatic effect on various Gram-positive bacteria, however, its toxicity precludes its usage for antimicrobial applications. Consequently, actinomycin D has been indicated as an anticancer drug for Wilms’ tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, testicular cancer, and ovarian cancer [8].
Mechanism of action
Actinomycin D exerts its cytotoxicity through DNA intercalation with its phenoxazone ring system at GpC sites and sustaining a slow rate of dissociation between actinomycin D and DNA. The DNA intercalation localizes the pentapeptide chains to the DNA minor groove, further stabilizing the actinomycin D-DNA interaction through hydrogen bonding. The actinomycin D-DNA interaction occurs when DNA is in a conformational intermediate state that is associated with the RNA transcriptional complex. Specifically, actinomycin D binds to guanine residues accessible from the transcriptional complex. Due to this binding RNA polymerase is blocked from further reading of template DNA, preventing elongation of RNA strands [9, 10]. Cancer cells are especially susceptible to actinomycin D due to high levels of transcription to accommodate rapid cell division. Though a highly effective anticancer compound, the usage of actinomycin D is limited due to its severe adverse effects. Adverse effects can include gastrointestinal ulceration, myelosuppression, anemia, soft tissue damage, and dermatological toxicities [8].
Bleomycins
Bleomycins are glycopeptide antibiotics isolated from Streptomyces verticullis [5]. Bleomycins are structurally unique antineoplastic antibiotics; the compounds possess four discrete binding domains: a metal-binding domain, a DNA-binding domain, 4-amino-3-hydroxy-2-methylpentanoic acid connectivity domain, and a carbohydrate domain. Each domain contributes functionally to the cytotoxic activity of bleomycins. At the clinical level a combination of bleomycin A2 and B2 is used in the treatment of ovarian cancer, testicular cancer, Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck [11].
Mechansim of action
Intravenous administration of bleomycins allow binding with Cu+ found in the blood serum, forming a bleomycin-Cu(II) complex. The bleomycin-Cu(II) complex is actively transported into cells, though the exact transporter has yet to be defined. Upon entry into the nucleus, bleomycin exchanges Cu(II) for Fe(II) to form a bleomycin-Fe(II) complex. The bleomycin-Fe(II) complex binds to O2, then accepts an electron to form the activated bleomycin complex- bleomycin-Fe(III)-OOH. This complex targets DNA through abstraction of the C4’ hydrogen atom from the deoxyribose of a pyrimidine nucleotide, forming a free radical intermediate at C4’. The subsequent steps leading to DNA breakage are determined by the presence or absence of O2. With O2 present, the C4’ radical reacts with O2 to form 4’-hydroperoxide through reduction of a peroxyl radical. 4’-hydroperoxide induces a series of chemical reactions culminating in DNA strand scission to form 3’-phosphoglycolate and 5’-phosphate termini. The O2-independent pathway leads to oxidation of the C4’ radical, forming a 4’-carbocation, then a C4’-oxidized abasic site through a hydroxylation reaction. Accordingly, single and double-stranded breaks in DNA are formed, leading to prevention of DNA synthesis [12, 13]. Activated bleomycins also have demonstrated a degree of sequence selectivity. Bleomycin-induced breakage was found to preferentially occur at 5’-GTGT*AC or 5’-TGT*A, where * is the cleavage site [14]. Unfortunately, sequence selectivity is not sufficient to mitigate the adverse effects of bleomycins. Pulmonary toxicity is one of the greatest limitations in the use of bleomycins, occurring in approximately 10% of patients treated with the drug. Bleomycin-induced lung injury can manifest in the form of pneumonitis or eosinophilic inflammation, which can progress to life-threatening pulmonary fibrosis [11].
Carfilzomib
Carfilzomib is a proteasome inhibitor analog of epoxomicin, which is derived from Actinomyces strain No. Q996-17 [15]. This compound is a tetrapeptide epoxyketone, indicated for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma [15]. Thus, carfilzomib shares many of the same structures as epoxomicin, including a peptide-binding portion and an epoxyketone pharmacophore [15]. It is these two structures that contribute to the anticancer activity of carfilzomib.
Mechanism of action
The peptide-binding portion allows covalent binding to the substrate binding regions of the 20 S proteasome, and the epoxyketone pharmacophore stereospecifically targets a catalytic threonine residue. This residue is located on the β5 chymotrypsin-like subunit of the proteasome, resulting in its irreversible inhibition. The proteasome inhibition of carfilzomib can drive several distinct cellular mechanisms that converge to the same result- cell death [16]. Proteasome inhibition also drives the accumulation and stabilization of proteins that are canonically rapidly degraded in cancer cells. Stabilization and activation of proapoptotic effectors Bak and Bax, allow for the formation of the apoptosome followed by activation of caspases and apoptosis pathways [17]. Similarly, carfilzomib-mediated proteasome inhibition also leads to stable expression of tumor suppressor p53 and its targets p21 and p27. As an inhibitor of cyclins CDK1, CDK2, and CDK4/6, enhanced intracellular levels of p21 prevents cell cycle progression from G1 to S-phase. Elevated p27 levels promote cell cycle arrest in G1 phase, followed by cell death [16, 17]. Clinical usage of carfilzomib is commonly associated with hypertension, dyspnea, peripheral neuropathy, and cardiac failure. Additionally, as identified in the FOCUS trial in which carfilzomib was administered with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide, the carfilzomib arm experienced higher renal adverse events compared to the control arm (24% vs 9%, respectively) [16].
Doxorubicin
Doxorubicin, an anthracycline antibiotic derived from actinobacterium Streptomyces peucetius, is amongst the most potent anticancer compounds [18]. Doxorubicin has a broad reach, the drug is used in the treatment of breast, lung, gastric, ovarian, thyroid, Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, multiple myeloma, sarcoma, and pediatric cancers [18].
Mechanism of action
In the cytoplasm, doxorubicin forms a doxorubicin-proteasome complex via binding to the proteasome’s 20 S subunit, allowing its entry into the nucleus through nuclear pore complexes [19]. Upon entry to the nucleus, doxorubicin can intercalate into DNA following a double-stranded break produced by Topoisomerase II, in effect stabilizing a Topoisomerase II-DNA complex and consequently preventing the double-stranded break from re-ligation [19]. Anthracycline antibiotics, including doxorubicin, possess a quinone moiety that can undergo redox reactions by oxidoreductases, producing the free radical semiquinone. Semiquinone can convert oxygen into reactive oxygen species (ROS). In cells, production of ROS can lead to lipid peroxidation and DNA damage, both of which induce apoptosis [19]. Another proposed mechanism of action pertains to doxorubicin-mediated chromatin damage. Upon intercalation in the DNA minor groove, the amino sugar groups of doxorubicin compete for space with histone H4 residues [20]. In effect, histones are “evicted” from nucleosomes, the foundation of chromatin. The resultant chromatin damage manifests as epigenetic and transcriptomic alternations as well as diminished DNA damage response [19, 20].
The double-edged sword of doxorubicin treatment while quite effective, its use is hindered by significant, dose-limiting toxicity. Cardiomyocytes, the cells responsible for contraction of the heart, are particularly susceptible to doxorubicin-mediated toxicity. Cardiomyocyte toxicity has been demonstrated by two mechanisms: apoptosis through upregulation of death receptors TNFR1, Fas, DR4, and DR5 and triggering ferroptosis through lipid peroxidation in mitochondria [21, 22]. At the clinical level, doxorubicin is associated with acute cardiotoxicity, which can develop into cardiomyopathy or congestive heart failure. In addition to cardiomyocytes, rapidly dividing cells are a target of doxorubicin. This can result in toxicity to red and white blood cells, gastrointestinal mucosa, and hair follicles resulting in myelosuppression, neutropenic enterocolitis, and hair loss, respectively [19].
Inotuzumab ozogamicin
Inotuzumab ozogamicin is an antibody-drug conjugate containing an enediyne antibiotic component produced by Micromonospora echinospora [23]. It is an antineoplastic agent that comprises a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal IgG4 antibody G544 that is conjugated to a cytotoxic antibiotic N-acetyl-gamma-calicheamicin through an acetyl butyrate linker. The antibiotic component of inotuzumab ozoagmicin belongs the calicheamicin class of antibiotics [23].
Mechanism of action
Following the binding of CD22, a surface antigen commonly expressed on B-cell malignancies, the ozogamicin component is internalized into the cell, forming an endosome. The encapsulated inotuzumab ozogamicin complex fuses with an intracellular lysosome. Due to the acidic environment within the lysosome, the inotuzumab ozogamicin complex is cleaved at the acetyl butyrate linker. As a result, the ozogamicin antibiotic is free from the anti-CD22 antibody, resulting in its activated form. Activated ozogamicin is released from the lysosome and migrates to the nucleus. Intranuclear ozogamicin intercalates into the minor groove of DNA. The DNA binding results in a structural change to the enediyne moiety of ozogamicin, leading to the formation of diradicals. These diradicals abstract hydrogen ions from the phosphodiester bonds of DNA, generating double stranded breaks through oxidative strand scission. Consequently, the cell cycle is arrested in G2/M-phase and triggers apoptotic cell death [23, 24]. Though the anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody component of inotuzumab ozogamicin confers a high degree of specificity in targeting B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, liver toxicity has been linked to the drug. In the phase 3 INO-VATE study, hepatic veno-occlusive disease was observed in 11-13% in patients treated with inotuzumab ozogamacin compared to < 1% occurrence in the standard-treatment group [25].
Mitomycin C
Mitomycin C (MMC) is a metabolite produced by Streptomyces caespitosis [26]. In bacteria, MMC is a highly potent antibiotic, inducing bacterial cell death through selective crosslinking of complementary strands of DNA [26]. Interestingly, the antibiotic and anticancer mechanisms of MMC are quite similar.
Mechanism of action
MMC undergoes a reductive activating reaction resulting in two alkylating reactions that occur in the cytosol of the cell. Bioactivation of MMC has been reported to be mediated by NRF2 in KEAP1-KO cancer cells [27]. The first activating reaction covalently links the C1 of MMC to DNA, and the second links DNA to MMC at C10, culminating in crosslinking of DNA. MMC typically forms crosslinks at the N6 position of adenine residues or the N2 or N7 position of guanine residues. The interaction between DNA and MMC prevents access to DNA synthesis machinery, inducing cell cycle arrest and cell death [26, 28]. Higher concentrations of MMC have also been shown to suppress RNA synthesis and protein translation, likely potentiating the cytotoxic properties of MMC [29]. A unique feature of MMC is that it can discriminate between cancerous and non-cancerous tissue. The selectivity of MMC relies on the hypoxic environment found within the core of many tumors. In such an oxygen poor environment, MMC can feasibly undergo activation via reduction and exert its cytotoxic properties [26]. In noncancerous tissue, where oxygen is significantly more abundant, MMC remains in its inactive form [26]. Consequently, noncancerous tissue experience much less of the cytotoxic effects of MMC. The selective cytotoxicity of MMC has made it a suitable treatment for bladder, breast, anal, and gastrointestinal malignancies [30].
Pentostatin
Pentostatin, or 2’-deoxycoformycin, is an antimetabolite derived from Streptomyces antibioticus. Structurally, pentostatin mimics the nucleoside adenosine, though differs in that the purine ring is modified with a 7-membered ring in place of a 6-membered ring, as well as a deletion of the amino group from the purine ring that is replaced with a hydroxyl group.
Mechanism of action
Pentostatin enters cells through nucleoside transporters hENT1 and hENT2 [31]. Pentostatin potently binds and inhibits the enzyme adenosine adeaminase (ADA). ADA converts adenosine and deoxyadenosine and into inosine and deoxyinosine, respectively. Though expressed in all tissues, lymphoid cells have especially high ADA activity, thus ADA inhibitor pentostatin is indicated for the treatment of hairy cell leukemia. Mechanistically, ADA inhibition leads to increased intracellular levels of adenosine and deoxyadenosine, as ADA is unable to catabolize these nucleosides. To reduce the intracellular deoxyadenosine concentration, deoxyadenosine is converted to deoxyadenosine triphosphate (dATP). The increased intracellular levels of dATP negatively regulate ribonucleotide reductase activity, which results in decreased production of other nucleotides. Due to the lack of available deoxyribonucleotides, both DNA and RNA synthesis is obstructed, ultimately leading to cell death [32]. Consequently, pentostatin is regarded as a cell cycle selective agent, inducing cell cycle arrest in the DNA and RNA synthesis phase, S-phase [32, 33]. Pentostatin has also demonstrated synergistic capabilities when combined with cyclophosphamide and rituximab, culminating in enhanced therapeutic response in chronic lymphocytic leukemia with minor treatment-related toxicity [34].
Emerging anticancer agents from microbial metabolites
Given the immense quantity and diversity of bioactive molecules produced by microorganisms, microbial metabolites provide a seemingly endless supply of compounds to be screened for anticancer potential. Table 1 exhibits the vast diversity in structure, class, and anticancer mechanism encompassed by these promising microbial metabolites. This section also highlights several microbial metabolites that have demonstrated promising antitumor activity in preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials. The mechanisms of action of these compounds are also graphically displayed in Fig. 2. Anticancer compounds that have recently completed or ongoing clinical trials are further described in Table 2.
Azurin-p28
Azurin-p28 is a redox copper protein produced by gram-negative bacteria such as Alcaligenes dentrificans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Initial studies using azurin and its derivative peptides as a potent inducer of cell death, while maintaining selective cytotoxicity to cancer cells. Two mechanisms for the selectivity of azurin have been described. First, azurin has been shown to interfere with EPH receptor B2 signaling, a receptor upregulated in prostate cancer, gastrointestinal malignancies, and glioblastoma [35]. In addition, the p28 domain of azurin preferentially penetrated melanoma UISO-Mel-2 cells over noncancerous fibroblasts through caveolin-mediated internalization, suggesting p28 targets a receptor is highly expressed on cancer cells [36]. Azurin-mediated cytotoxicity occurred through the formation of an azurin and p53 complex, resulting in stabilization of p53, ultimately increasing cytosolic Bax and cytochrome c levels to initiate apoptosis [37]. The stabilization of p53 by azurin was later discovered by Hu et. al to be a result of overlap between azurin binding sites on p53 and that of E3 ubiquitin ligase COP1. Consequently, the competitive binding of azurin to p53 prevents COP1 ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation [38].
Butyrate
Butyrate is a short-chain fatty acid commonly produced by human gut microbiota such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Clostridium leptum, through bacterial fermentation of indigestible dietary fiber. The anticancer effect of butyrate is dynamic, in that it demonstrates different effects to different cell types. Direct treatment of colorectal cancer cells with butyrate has been shown to trigger apoptosis through activation of the JNK/AP-1 pathway [39]. In a separate study, butyrate treatment inhibited colony formation and cell migration while also inducing apoptosis through downregulation of homeostasis regulatory gene, thioredoxin-1 [40]. Though inducing cell death in cancer cells, butyrate enhances the tumoricidal properties of T cells. Through metabolomic screening of gut microbial contents for potential anticancer mediators, butyrate was identified on the basis it most strongly promoted effector T cell responses of all metabolites screened. Butyrate promoted granzyme B and IFN-γ production from CD8 + T cells while at the transcriptional level downregulated exhaustion-associated genes, suggesting butyrate may also be able to reinvigorate T cells in addition to promoting effector functionality. Most strikingly, however, was that in vivo butyrate treatment enhanced the antitumor effects of immunogenic cancer therapies such as oxaliplatin and anti-PD-1 blockade, through its CD8 + T cell boosting effect [41].
Cordycepin
Cordycepin, or 3’deoxyadenosine, is a bioactive isolate from the fungus Cordyceps militaris. Structurally, cordycepin resembles the nucleoside adenosine, but the key difference lies in the substitution of a hydrogen atom for the hydroxyl group at the 3’ position. Due to its structural resemblance to adenosine, cordycepin exhibits the ability to disrupt cell proliferation and viability across various types of solid tumors. Cordycepin has consistently demonstrated anticancer effects across various cancer types by modulating the Akt pathway signaling, indicating a reproducible mechanism for its therapeutic impact. The induction of anticancer effects by cordycepin has been consistently observed in diverse cancer types, with evidence pointing towards the modulation of Akt pathway signaling as a consistent and underlying mechanism [42]. In ovarian cancer cells, cordycepin induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner due to reduced CCL5 release to subsequently attenuate Akt/NF-kB signaling. Similarly, esophageal cells treated with cordycepin experienced apoptosis, in addition to reduced migratory and invasive capacity via AMPK activation and inhibition of Akt [43]. To build upon the intrinsic anticancer effects of cordycepin, a cordycepin-based ProTide has been developed. NUC-7738 is a ProTide that comprises cordycepin with a phosphoramidate transformation to augment potency and stability of the compound. These enhancements have positioned NUC-7738 to be used in a first-in-human phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors including melanoma, colorectal, gastric, and lung malignancies. Dose-escalation of NUC-7738 demonstrated a favorable safety profile with low-grade treatment-related adverse effects, as well as stabilizing disease progression in immunotherapy-resistant tumor types [44].
Inosine
Inosine is a nucleoside metabolite that consists of hypoxanthine linked to a ribose ring, produced during adenosine deamination. Though ubiquitous with purine metabolism, inosine produced by the gut residing bacterium Bifidobacterium pseudolongum has demonstrated a role as a potential antitumor immunotherapy [45]. In germ free mice bearing MC38 tumors (murine colorectal carcinoma cell line), the administration of inosine, CpG as a costimulator, and anti-CTLA-4 therapy experienced a significant reduction in tumor burden, demonstrating the ability of microbiome-derived metabolites to potentiate the response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy [46]. The antitumor effect of inosine was found to be largely T-cell intrinsic, increasing populations of intratumoral IFN-γ + T cells and promoting Th1 differentiation through A2aR signaling [45]. Paralleling its canonical role in purine metabolism, inosine also has been demonstrated as a carbon source for antitumor T cells. Activated CD8 + T cells in the presence of inosine alone experienced enhanced tumoricidal activity and cell proliferation mediated through pyruvate nucleoside phosphorylase. The high demand for glucose by cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment restricts its availability for effector cells. Consequently, inosine serves as an alternative fuel source, enabling T cells to exert their cytotoxic functions within the tumor [47].
Propionate
Propionate is a short chain fatty acid produced from several human gut microbiota including Veillonella parvula, Bacteroides eggerthii, Bacteroides fragilis, Ruminococcus bromii, and Eubacterium dolichum. Though sharing many characteristics with butyrate, propionate appears to have more of an ambiguous role in cancer. When administered orally, and thus interacting with the gut, propionate significantly reduced tumor development in a murine breast cancer xenograft model, through inhibition of JAK2-STAT3 signaling and ROS generation [48]. CD8 + T cells cultured directly with propionate experienced a substantial increase in the release of effector molecules while also reducing HDAC activity, suggesting that potential anticancer effects of propionate may emerge through modulation of T cell responses [49]. In contrast, high systemic propionate levels have also been linked to resistance to therapy in cancer patients. High serum propionate levels was inversely correlated to progression free survival and overall survival as well as associated with poor response to therapy in cancer patients receiving the immune checkpoint inhibitor, ipilimumab [50]. Further, propionate metabolism has been shown to allow breast cancer cells to undergo pro-metastatic programming through accumulation of metabolic byproducts propionyl-CoA and methylmalonic acid. The overexpression of propionyl-CoA dramatically increased the invasive and migratory properties of MDA-MB-231 cells, as well as increasing lung metastasis in a murine tumor model [51]. These contrasting reports of propionate in cancer suggests that route of administration and localization of propionate plays a significant role in determining its pro- or anti- tumor activity.
Nisin
Nisin is a small, 34 amino acid bacteriocin that is produced through fermentation by Gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis. Due to its broad-spectrum antibacterial properties, nisin has canonically been used as a food preservative, however, as nisin is also a bacteriocin, its anticancer potential has become an area of interest. Initial cytotoxicity studies describe nisin to preferentially arrest cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in HNSCC cells over noncancerous oral keratinocytes- which were unaffected by nisin treatment. The pro-apoptotic and antiproliferative effects of nisin were found to be mediated through activation of pro-apoptotic cation transport regulator CHAC1 [52]. The tumor-selective qualities of nisin were further confirmed using an oral cancer xenograft mouse model. Nisin-treated animals experienced a dose-dependent reduction in tumor volume and intratumoral microvessel density, while exhibiting no histological signs of toxicity to the liver, lung, or kidney [53]. The role of nisin as an adjuvant therapy to established anticancer agents has also been investigated. Paralleling these findings, the combination of nisin and doxorubicin drastically increased the rate of apoptosis in cancerous tissue [54]. In all, nisin holds much promise as a minimally toxic cancer therapy that can be used as both a standalone therapy and in combination.
Microbial metabolites as immunomodulatory agents
A fundamental function of the immune system is the ability to distinguish “self” from “non-self.” Upon recognition of foreign or “non-self” antigens, the immune system incites a robust, inflammatory response in attempt to eradicate the foreign particles. Given the microbial sourcing, thus “non-self” origin of these compounds, the immunostimulatory abilities of these metabolites are being investigated to utilize the power of the immune system to fight cancer. Recently, microbial metabolites produced from both the gut and tumor microbiome, have been recently identified for their robust immunomodulatory potential.
Pentanoate, a short chain fatty acid produced by gut residing bacterium Megasphaera massiliensis, drastically increased the frequency of effector IFN-γ+ and TNF-α + CD8 + T cells in vitro. Using the B16 melanoma model, tumor bearing mice underwent adoptive transfer of pentanoate cultured CD8 + T cells, leading to a dramatic reduction in tumor growth. Paralleling that result, tumors of mice treated with pentanoate cultured T cells had significant infiltration of additional effector IFN-γ+ and TNF-α + CD8 + T cells, as well as increased expression of effector marker CD25 [49]. The treatment of T cells with pentanoate may have potential for clinical application, as human CAR T cells treated with pentanoate also enhanced CD25 expression as well as IL-2 production [49] (Fig. 3).
Enhanced antitumor immune cell function has also been demonstrated by trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a choline metabolite produced by Blautia, Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium, Dorea, Tyzzerella, and Roseburia species. Wang et. al discovered that TMAO produced by tumor-residing species was associated with an immune-activated tumor microenvironment in patients with triple negative breast cancer [55]. Similarly, breast tumor bearing mice treated with TMAO experienced a drastic reduction in tumor growth [55]. TMAO in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy also significantly enhanced the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade, suggesting T cell activity may contribute to the antitumor response of TMAO. This was supported as TMAO-treated tumors had a significant increase in CD8 + T cell infiltration. In addition, CD8 + T cells from TMAO-treated tumors had enhanced production of effector cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α [55].
Microbial-based bioactive compounds
Secondary metabolites from microbes encompass only a fraction of biologically active natural products that have the potential to treat human disease. In its simplest form, biologically active compounds are compounds that have a physiological effect an organism. Thus, these compounds have been investigated for therapeutic potential. Tryptophan derivative indole-3-lactic acid (ILA) produced by Lactobacillus gallinarum and Lactobacillus plantarum is a bioactive tryptophan derivative with promising anticancer properties. Oral administration of ILA to ApcMin/+ C57BL/6 mice drastically prevented spontaneous colon tumor formation as well as reducing tumor size of established tumors. This effect was a result of apoptosis mediated by ILA in colorectal cancer cells, but not in non-cancerous epithelial cells [56]. In another study, ILA was shown to have immune-mediated antitumor properties to target colorectal cancer. ILA enhanced CD8 + T cell priming through increased IL-12 production from dendritic cells. Acting directly on tumor infiltrating CD8 + T cells, ILA also increased granzyme B and IFN-γ production [57].
Microbe-produced exopolysaccharides (EPS) are long-chain, high molecular weight polysaccharides currently being investigated for anticancer and immunomodulatory potential [58]. Dietary consumption of EPS derived from Lactobacillus delbrueckii, EPS-R1, sensitized Colon26 and 4T1 tumors to anti-CTLA4 blockade therapy, significantly reducing tumor progression [59]. This response occurred in CCL20+ tumors, and accordingly enhanced migration of IFN-γ producing CXCR3 + CCR6 + CD8 + T cells into the tumor. Further, the antitumor CCR6 + CD8 + T cell population was generated through EPS-R1 and the lysophosphatidic acid receptor 2 expressed on CD8 + T cells [59].
Conclusions and future perspectives
Balancing the effectiveness of cancer treatments with potential side effects presents a significant challenge in cancer therapeutics. Some well-established microbial metabolites, such as doxorubicin and bleomycin, have demonstrated strong abilities to kill cancer cells and are routinely used in cancer treatment plans. These well-established, microbial-derived compounds are often accompanied by severe adverse toxicities. Due to these toxicities, treatment with the compound is often shortened or stopped, or the dosage is lowered to where it becomes significantly less effective in reducing the patient’s disease progression. A solution to these shortcomings with the current microbial-based treatment modalities has been a refocusing towards microbial-based anticancer agents with a high degree of cancer specificity.
Given that these compounds originate from microorganisms there may be good reason for utilizing them for cancer treatment by modulating the immune system. The innate immune system can be engaged by metabolites through pattern recognition receptors that act as sensors, for shared patterns found in microbes. When these receptors are activated, they can trigger a response leading to the activation of antigen-presenting cells and the production of inflammatory and effector cytokines. In the context of cancer, this response can alert the system to the presence of a tumor. Potentially contribute to its elimination. These compounds exhibit a remarkable feature - they contain components that can stimulate the immune system. This immunostimulatory property enables them to precisely target cancerous tissues, leaving healthy tissues unaffected.
Similarly, the selectivity of the immune system can also be utilized in the context of antibody-drug conjugates incorporating microbial metabolites as a “warhead” molecule. In this context, a highly and non-selectively cytotoxic microbial metabolite would be conjugated to a monoclonal antibody. To selectively target cancer cells, the antibody is specific for moieties expressed only on malignant cells. As a result, the cytotoxic compound is solely delivered to cancerous cells, leading to highly selective cancer cell death. These compounds have already demonstrated clinical efficacy and will likely be further developed through incorporation of novel tumor antigen targets and microbial metabolites with greater potency.
This exciting generation of secondary metabolites represents just a fraction of the bioactive compounds found in the microbial world that hold potential for treating human diseases, including cancer.
References
Adedeji W. The treasure called antibiotics. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2016;14:56.
Berdy J. Bioactive microbial metabolites. J Antibiot. 2005;58:1–26.
Horak I, Engelbrecht G, van Rensburg PJ, Claassens S. Microbial metabolomics: essential definitions and the importance of cultivation conditions for utilizing Bacillus species as bionematicides. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;127:326–43.
Davies J. Specialized microbial metabolites: functions and origins. J Antibiot. 2013;66:361–4.
Bacteria as a treasure house of secondary metabolites with anticancer potential. Semin Cancer Biol. Elsevier, 2022.
Li JW-H, Vederas JC. Drug discovery and natural products: end of an era or an endless frontier? Science. 2009;325:161–5.
Atanasov AG, Zotchev SB, Dirsch VM, Supuran CT. Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:200–16.
Koba M, Konopa J Actinomycin D and its mechanisms of action. Adv Hygiene Exp Med. 2005; 59.
Hollstein U. Actinomycin. Chemistry and mechanism of action. Chem Rev. 1974;74:625–52.
Cooper HL, Braverman R. The mechanism by which actinomycin D inhibits protein synthesis in animal cells. Nature. 1977;269:527–9.
Brandt JP, Gerriets V. Bleomycin. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan. 2023 Aug 28.
Umezawa H, Ishizuka M, Kimura K, Iwanaga J, Takeuchi T. Biological studies on individual bleomycins. J Antibiotics. 1968;21:592–602.
Dorr RT. Bleomycin pharmacology: mechanism of action and resistance, and clinical pharmacokinetics. Semin Oncol. 1992.
Hecht SM. Bleomycin: new perspectives on the mechanism of action. J Nat Prod. 2000;63:158–68.
Hanada M, Sugawara K, Kaneta K, Toda S, Nishiyama Y, Tomita K, et al. Epoxomicin, a new antitumor agent of microbial origin. J Antibiot. 1992;45:1746–52.
Jayaweera SPE, Wanigasinghe Kanakanamge SP, Rajalingam D, Silva GN. Carfilzomib: a promising proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:740796.
Khan RZ, Badros A. Role of carfilzomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Hematol. 2012;5:361–72.
Thorn CF, Oshiro C, Marsh S, Hernandez-Boussard T, McLeod H, Klein TE, et al. Doxorubicin pathways: pharmacodynamics and adverse effects. Pharmacogenetics Genomics. 2011;21:440.
van der Zanden SY, Qiao X, Neefjes J. New insights into the activities and toxicities of the old anticancer drug doxorubicin. FEBS J. 2021;288:6095–111.
Pang B, Qiao X, Janssen L, Velds A, Groothuis T, Kerkhoven R, et al. Drug-induced histone eviction from open chromatin contributes to the chemotherapeutic effects of doxorubicin. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1908.
Zhao L, Zhang B. Doxorubicin induces cardiotoxicity through upregulation of death receptors mediated apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44735.
Tadokoro T, Ikeda M, Ide T, Deguchi H, Ikeda S, Okabe K, et al. Mitochondria-dependent ferroptosis plays a pivotal role in doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. JCI Insight. 2020; Vol. 5
George B, Kantarjian H, Jabbour E, Jain N. Role of inotuzumab ozogamicin in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Immunotherapy. 2016;8:135–43.
Shor B, Gerber H-P, Sapra P. Preclinical and clinical development of inotuzumab-ozogamicin in hematological malignancies. Mol Immunol. 2015;67:107–16.
Kantarjian HM, DeAngelo DJ, Stelljes M, Liedtke M, Stock W, Gökbuget N, et al. Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard of care in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Final report and long‐term survival follow‐up from the randomized, phase 3 INO‐VATE study. Cancer. 2019;125:2474–87.
Tomasz M. Mitomycin C: small, fast and deadly (but very selective). Chem Biol. 1995;2:575–9.
Baird L, Yamamoto M. NRF2-dependent bioactivation of mitomycin C as a novel strategy to target KEAP1-NRF2 pathway activation in human cancer. Mol Cell Biol. 2021;41:e00473–20.
Verweij J, Pinedo HM. Mitomycin C: mechanism of action, usefulness and limitations. Anti-cancer drugs. 1990;1:5–13.
Snodgrass RG, Collier AC, Coon AE, Pritsos CA. Mitomycin C inhibits ribosomal RNA: a novel cytotoxic mechanism for bioreductive drugs. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:19068–75.
Sinawe H, Casadesus D. Mitomycin. 2020. In: StatPearls StatPearls Publishing
Pastor-Anglada M, Pérez-Torras S. Nucleoside transporter proteins as biomarkers of drug responsiveness and drug targets. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:13.
Johnston JB. Mechanism of action of pentostatin and cladribine in hairy cell leukemia. Leuk lymphoma. 2011;52:43–45.
Gerson SL, Caimi PF, William BM, Creger RJ. Pharmacology and molecular mechanisms of antineoplastic agents for hematologic malignancies. In: Hematology. Elsevier, 2018, pp 849-912.
Lamanna N, Kalaycio M, Maslak P, Jurcic JG, Heaney M, Brentjens R, et al. Pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab is an active, well-tolerated regimen for patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1575–81.
Wang X, Wu X, Zhang Z, Ma C, Wu T, Tang S, et al. Monensin inhibits cell proliferation and tumor growth of chemo-resistant pancreatic cancer cells by targeting the EGFR signaling pathway. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17914.
Ketola K, Vainio P, Fey V, Kallioniemi O, Iljin K. Monensin is a potent inducer of oxidative stress and inhibitor of androgen signaling leading to apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9:3175–85.
Liu L, Zhu H, Wu W, Shen Y, Lin X, Wu Y, et al. Neoantimycin F, a streptomyces-derived natural product induces mitochondria-related apoptotic death in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1042.
Bury M, Girault A, Megalizzi V, Spiegl-Kreinecker S, Mathieu V, Berger W, et al. Ophiobolin A induces paraptosis-like cell death in human glioblastoma cells by decreasing BKCa channel activity. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e561.
Villarante KI, Elegado FB, Iwatani S, Zendo T, Sonomoto K, de Guzman EE. Purification, characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity of the bacteriocin from Pediococcus acidilactici K2a2-3 against human colon adenocarcinoma (HT29) and human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;27:975–80.
Wang H, Jin J, Pang X, Bian Z, Zhu J, Hao Y, et al. Plantaricin BM-1 decreases viability of SW480 human colorectal cancer cells by inducing caspase-dependent apoptosis. Front Microbiol. 2023;13:1103600.
de Almeida LC, Bauermeister A, Rezende-Teixeira P, Dos Santos EA, de Moraes LAB, Machado-Neto JA, et al. Pradimicin-IRD exhibits antineoplastic effects by inducing DNA damage in colon cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2019;168:38–47.
Anwar MM, Shalaby M, Embaby AM, Saeed H, Agwa MM, Hussein A. Prodigiosin/PU-H71 as a novel potential combined therapy for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): preclinical insights. Sci Rep. 2020;10:14706.
Wang Z, Li B, Zhou L, Yu S, Su Z, Song J, et al. Prodigiosin inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling and exerts anticancer activity in breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:13150–5.
Abdi-Ali A, Worobec E, Deezagi A, Malekzadeh F. Cytotoxic effects of pyocin S2 produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the growth of three human cell lines. Can J Microbiol. 2004;50:375–81.
Abdelaziz AA, Kamer AMA, Al-Monofy KB, Al-Madboly LA. A purified and lyophilized Pseudomonas aeruginosa derived pyocyanin induces promising apoptotic and necrotic activities against MCF-7 human breast adenocarcinoma. Microb Cell Factories. 2022;21:262.
Anizon F, Belin L, Moreau P, Sancelme M, Voldoire A, Prudhomme M, et al. Syntheses and biological activities (topoisomerase inhibition and antitumor and antimicrobial properties) of rebeccamycin analogues bearing modified sugar moieties and substituted on the imide nitrogen with a methyl group. J Med Chem. 1997;40:3456–65.
Dowlati A, Hoppel CL, Ingalls ST, Majka S, Li X, Sedransk N, et al. Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of rebeccamycin analog NSC 655649 given daily for five consecutive days. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2309–18.
Vijayabharathi R, Bruheim P, Andreassen T, Raja DS, Devi PB, Sathyabama S, et al. Assessment of resistomycin, as an anticancer compound isolated and characterized from Streptomyces aurantiacus AAA5. J Microbiol. 2011;49:920–6.
Liu SS, Qi J, Teng ZD, Tian FT, Lv XX, Li K, et al. Resistomycin attenuates triple-negative breast cancer progression by inhibiting E3 ligase Pellino-1 and inducing SNAIL/SLUG degradation. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:133.
Koo K, Kim H, Bae Y, Kim K, Park B, Lee C, et al. Salinomycin induces cell death via inactivation of Stat3 and downregulation of Skp2. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e693.
Mai TT, Hamaï A, Hienzsch A, Cañeque T, Müller S, Wicinski J, et al. Salinomycin kills cancer stem cells by sequestering iron in lysosomes. Nat Chem. 2017;9:1025–33.
Lu D, Choi MY, Yu J, Castro JE, Kipps TJ, Carson DA. Salinomycin inhibits Wnt signaling and selectively induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:13253–7.
Dahlem C, Siow WX, Lopatniuk M, Tse WK, Kessler SM, Kirsch SH, et al. Thioholgamide A, a new anti-proliferative anti-tumor agent, modulates macrophage polarization and metabolism. Cancers. 2020;12:1288.
Chen J, Barrett L, Lin Z, Kendrick S, Mu S, Dai L, et al. Identification of natural compounds tubercidin and lycorine HCl against small‐cell lung cancer and BCAT1 as a therapeutic target. J Cell Mol Med. 2022;26:2557–65.
Li XQ, Yue CW, Xu WH, Lü YH, Huang YJ, Tian P, et al. A milbemycin compound isolated from Streptomyces Sp. FJS31-2 with cytotoxicity and reversal of cisplatin resistance activity in A549/DDP cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;128:110322.
Dimopoulos M-A, Mitsiades CS, Anderson KC, Richardson PG. Tanespimycin as antitumor therapy. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2011;11:17–22.
Major A, Kline J, Karrison TG, Fishkin PA, Kimball AS, Petrich AM, et al. Phase I/II clinical trial of temsirolimus and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory lymphomas. Haematologica. 2022;107:1608.
Mull BB, Livingston JA, Patel N, Bui T, Hunt KK, Keyomarsi K. Specific, reversible G1 arrest by UCN-01 in vivo provides cytostatic protection of normal cells against cytotoxic chemotherapy in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2020;122:812–22.
Solimando DA Jr, Waddell JA. Denileukin diftitox and valrubicin. Hosp Pharm. 1999;34:1381–5.
Chaudhari A, Mahfouz M, Fialho AM, Yamada T, Granja AT, Zhu Y, et al. Cupredoxin− cancer interrelationship: Azurin binding with EphB2, interference in EphB2 tyrosine phosphorylation, and inhibition of cancer growth. Biochemistry. 2007;46:1799–810.
Taylor BN, Mehta RR, Yamada T, Lekmine F, Christov K, Chakrabarty AM, et al. Noncationic peptides obtained from azurin preferentially enter cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69:537–46.
Yamada T, Goto M, Punj V, Zaborina O, Chen ML, Kimbara K, et al. Bacterial redox protein azurin, tumor suppressor protein p53, and regression of cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99:14098–103.
Hu J, Jiang W, Zuo J, Shi D, Chen X, Yang X, et al. Structural basis of bacterial effector protein azurin targeting tumor suppressor p53 and inhibiting its ubiquitination. Commun Biol. 2023;6:59.
Mandal M, Olson DJ, Sharma T, Vadlamudi RK, Kumar R. Butyric acid induces apoptosis by up-regulating Bax expression via stimulation of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase/activation protein-1 pathway in human colon cancer cells. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:71–78.
Wang W, Fang D, Zhang H, Xue J, Wangchuk D, Du J, et al. Sodium butyrate selectively kills cancer cells and inhibits migration in colorectal cancer by targeting thioredoxin-1. OncoTargets Ther. 2020;4691–704.
He Y, Fu L, Li Y, Wang W, Gong M, Zhang J, et al. Gut microbial metabolites facilitate anticancer therapy efficacy by modulating cytotoxic CD8 + T cell immunity. Cell Metab. 2021;33:988–1000.e7.
Gao Y, Chen DL, Zhou M, Zheng ZS, He MF, Huang S, et al. Cordycepin enhances the chemosensitivity of esophageal cancer cells to cisplatin by inducing the activation of AMPK and suppressing the AKT signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:866.
Cui ZY, Park SJ, Jo E, Hwang IH, Lee KB, Kim SW, et al. Cordycepin induces apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells by inhibiting CCL5-mediated Akt/NF-κB signaling pathway. Cell Death Discov. 2018;4:62.
Schwenzer H, De Zan E, Elshani M, Van Stiphout R, Kudsy M, Morris J, et al. The novel nucleoside analogue ProTide NUC-7738 overcomes cancer resistance mechanisms in vitro and in a first-in-human phase I clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:6500–13.
Kim IS, Jo E-K. Inosine: a bioactive metabolite with multimodal actions in human diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1043970.
Mager LF, Burkhard R, Pett N, Cooke NC, Brown K, Ramay H, et al. Microbiome-derived inosine modulates response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Science. 2020;369:1481–9.
Wang T, Gnanaprakasam JR, Chen X, Kang S, Xu X, Sun H, et al. Inosine is an alternative carbon source for CD8 + -T-cell function under glucose restriction. Nat Metab. 2020;2:635–47.
Park HS, Han JH, Park JW, Lee DH, Jang KW, Lee M, et al. Sodium propionate exerts anticancer effect in mice bearing breast cancer cell xenograft by regulating JAK2/STAT3/ROS/p38 MAPK signaling. Acta Pharmacologica Sin. 2021;42:1311–23.
Luu M, Riester Z, Baldrich A, Reichardt N, Yuille S, Busetti A, et al. Microbial short-chain fatty acids modulate CD8 + T cell responses and improve adoptive immunotherapy for cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4077.
Coutzac C, Jouniaux J-M, Paci A, Schmidt J, Mallardo D, Seck A, et al. Systemic short chain fatty acids limit antitumor effect of CTLA-4 blockade in hosts with cancer. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2168.
Gomes AP, Ilter D, Low V, Drapela S, Schild T, Mullarky E, et al. Altered propionate metabolism contributes to tumour progression and aggressiveness. Nat Metab. 2022;4:435–43.
Joo NE, Ritchie K, Kamarajan P, Miao D, Kapila YL. Nisin, an apoptogenic bacteriocin and food preservative, attenuates HNSCC tumorigenesis via CHAC 1. Cancer Med. 2012;1:295–305.
Kamarajan P, Hayami T, Matte B, Liu Y, Danciu T, Ramamoorthy A, et al. Nisin ZP, a bacteriocin and food preservative, inhibits head and neck cancer tumorigenesis and prolongs survival. PloS one. 2015;10:e0131008.
Preet S, Bharati S, Panjeta A, Tewari R, Rishi P. Effect of nisin and doxorubicin on DMBA-induced skin carcinogenesis—a possible adjunct therapy. Tumor Biol. 2015;36:8301–8.
Wang H, Rong X, Zhao G, Zhou Y, Xiao Y, Ma D, et al. The microbial metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide promotes antitumor immunity in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Metab. 2022;34:581–94.e8.
Sugimura N, Li Q, Chu ESH, Lau HCH, Fong W, Liu W, et al. Lactobacillus gallinarum modulates the gut microbiota and produces anti-cancer metabolites to protect against colorectal tumourigenesis. Gut. 2022;71:2011–21.
Zhang Q, Zhao Q, Li T, Lu L, Wang F, Zhang H, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum-derived indole-3-lactic acid ameliorates colorectal tumorigenesis via epigenetic regulation of CD8 + T cell immunity. Cell Metab. 2023;35:943–60.e9.
Zhou X, Hong T, Yu Q, Nie S, Gong D, Xiong T, et al. Exopolysaccharides from Lactobacillus plantarum NCU116 induce c-Jun dependent Fas/Fasl-mediated apoptosis via TLR2 in mouse intestinal epithelial cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14247.
Kawanabe-Matsuda H, Takeda K, Nakamura M, Makino S, Karasaki T, Kakimi K, et al. Dietary lactobacillus-derived exopolysaccharide enhances immune-checkpoint blockade therapy. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:1336–55.
O’Connor S, Szwej E, Nikodinovic-Runic J, O’Connor A, Byrne AT, Devocelle M, et al. The anti-cancer activity of a cationic anti-microbial peptide derived from monomers of polyhydroxyalkanoate. Biomaterials. 2013;34:2710–8.
Szwej E, Devocelle M, Kenny S, Guzik M, O’Connor S, Nikodinovic-Runic J, et al. The chain length of biologically produced (R)-3-hydroxyalkanoic acid affects biological activity and structure of anti-cancer peptides. J Biotechnol. 2015;204:7–12.
Nguyen HT, Pokhrel AR, Nguyen CT, Pham VTT, Dhakal D, Lim HN, et al. Streptomyces sp. VN1, a producer of diverse metabolites including non-natural furan-type anticancer compound. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1756.
Kouroshnia A, Zeinali S, Irani S, Sadeghi A. Induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in colorectal cancer cells by novel anticancer metabolites of Streptomyces sp. 801. Cancer Cell Int. 2022;22:235.
Isobe Y, Okumura M, McGregor LM, Brittain SM, Jones MD, Liang X, et al. Manumycin polyketides act as molecular glues between UBR7 and P53. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;16:1189–98.
Zhong L, Yang B, Zhang Z, Wang J, Wang X, Guo Y, et al. Targeting autophagy peptidase ATG4B with a novel natural product inhibitor Azalomycin F4a for advanced gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:161.
Yuan N, Song L, Zhang S, Lin W, Cao Y, Xu F, et al. Bafilomycin A1 targets both autophagy and apoptosis pathways in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2015;100:345.
Paiva AD, de Oliveira MD, de Paula SO, Baracat-Pereira MC, Breukink E, Mantovani HC. Toxicity of bovicin HC5 against mammalian cell lines and the role of cholesterol in bacteriocin activity. Microbiology. 2012;158:2851–8.
Florêncio KGD, Edson EA, Fernandes KSDS, Luiz JPM, Pinto FDCL, Pessoa ODL, et al. Chromomycin A5 induces bona fide immunogenic cell death in melanoma. Front Immunol. 2022;13:941757.
Liu DN, Liu M, Zhang SS, Shang YF, Song FH, Zhang HW, et al. Chrysomycin A inhibits the proliferation, migration and invasion of U251 and U87-MG glioblastoma cells to exert its anti-cancer effects. Molecules. 2022;27:6148.
Zhang J, Liu P, Chen J, Yao D, Liu Q, Zhang J, et al. Upgrade of chrysomycin A as a novel topoisomerase II inhibitor to curb KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma progression. Pharmacol Res. 2023;187:106565.
Chumchalová J, Šmarda J. Human tumor cells are selectively inhibited by colicins. Folia Microbiol. 2003;48:111–5.
Taherikalani M, Ghafourian S. Anticancer properties of colicin E7 against colon cancer. Gastroenterol Rev/Przegląd Gastroenterologiczny. 2021;16:364–8.
Hetz C, Bono MR, Barros LF, Lagos R. Microcin E492, a channel-forming bacteriocin from Klebsiella pneumoniae, induces apoptosis in some human cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99:2696–701.
Lagos R, Tello M, Mercado G, García V, Monasterio O. Antibacterial and antitumorigenic properties of microcin E492, a pore-forming bacteriocin. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2009;10:74–85.
Park HB, Kwon HC, Lee C-H, Yang HO. Glionitrin A, an antibiotic− antitumor metabolite derived from competitive interaction between abandoned mine microbes. J Nat Prod. 2009;72:248–52.
Park HB, Kim YJ, Park JS, Yang HO, Lee KR, Kwon HC, et al. a cancer invasion inhibitory diketopiperazine produced by microbial coculture. J Nat Prod. 2011;74:2309–12.
Rambabu V, Suba S, Vijayakumar S. Antimicrobial and antiproliferative prospective of kosinostatin–a secondary metabolite isolated from Streptomyces sp. J Pharm Anal. 2015;5:378–82.
Blachier J, Cleret A, Guerin N, Gil C, Fanjat J-M, Tavernier F, et al. L-asparaginase anti-tumor activity in pancreatic cancer is dependent on its glutaminase activity and resistance is mediated by glutamine synthetase. Exp Cell Res. 2023;426:113568.
Nguyen HA, Su Y, Zhang JY, Antanasijevic A, Caffrey M, Schalk AM, et al. A novel l-asparaginase with low l-glutaminase coactivity is highly efficacious against both T-and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias in vivo. Cancer Res. 2018;78:1549–60.
Terenzi A, La Franca M, van Schoonhoven S, Panchuk R, Martínez Á, Heffeter P, et al. Landomycins as glutathione-depleting agents and natural fluorescent probes for cellular Michael adduct-dependent quinone metabolism. Commun Chem. 2021;4:162.
Baindara P, Gautam A, Raghava G, Korpole S. Anticancer properties of a defensin like class IId bacteriocin Laterosporulin10. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46541.
Niu S, Li S, Chen Y, Tian X, Zhang H, Zhang G, et al. Lobophorins E and F, new spirotetronate antibiotics from a South China Sea-derived Streptomyces sp. SCSIO 01127. J Antibiot. 2011;64:711–6.
Zhang J, Jiang H, Xie L, Hu J, Li L, Yang M, et al. Antitumor effect of manumycin on colorectal cancer cells by increasing the reactive oxygen species production and blocking PI3K-AKT pathway. OncoTargets Therapy. 2016:2885–95.
Plitzko B, Kaweesa EN, Loesgen S. The natural product mensacarcin induces mitochondrial toxicity and apoptosis in melanoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:21102–16.
Kaweesa EN, Padhi A, Davis GN, McMillan RP, Brown DA, Nain AS, et al. Combination of the natural product mensacarcin with vemurafenib (Zelboraf) combats BRAF mutant and chemo-resistant melanoma in vitro by affecting cell metabolism and cellular migration. Adv Cancer Biol-Metastasis. 2022;6:100070.
de Souza Oliveira PF, Faria AV, Clerici SP, Akagi EM, Carvalho HF, Justo GZ, et al. Violacein negatively modulates the colorectal cancer survival and epithelial–mesenchymal transition. J Cell Biochem. 2022;123:1247–58.
Ferreira CV, Bos CL, Versteeg HH, Justo GZ, Durán N, Peppelenbosch MP. Molecular mechanism of violacein-mediated human leukemia cell death. Blood. 2004;104:1459–64.
Lv C, Hong Y, Miao L, Li C, Xu G, Wei S, et al. Wentilactone A as a novel potential antitumor agent induces apoptosis and G2/M arrest of human lung carcinoma cells, and is mediated by HRas-GTP accumulation to excessively activate the Ras/Raf/ERK/p53-p21 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e952.
Zhang Z, Miao L, Lv C, Sun H, Wei S, Wang B, et al. Wentilactone B induces G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis via the Ras/Raf/MAPK signaling pathway in human hepatoma SMMC-7721 cells. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e657.
Trevino AV, Woynarowska BA, Herman TS, Priebe W, Woynarowski JM. Enhanced topoisomerase II targeting by annamycin and related 4-demethoxy anthracycline analogues. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004;3:1403–10.
Hamadani M, Collins GP, Caimi PF, Samaniego F, Spira A, Davies A, et al. Camidanlumab tesirine in relapsed/refractory lymphoma: a phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation, dose-expansion study. Lancet Haematol. 2021;8:e433.
Leamon CP, Reddy JA, Bloomfield A, Dorton R, Nelson M, Vetzel M, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-specific antitumor activity of a self-immolative tubulysin conjugate. Bioconjugate Chem. 2019;30:1805–13.
Kreitman RJ, Stetler-Stevenson M, Jaffe ES, Conlon KC, Steinberg SM, Wilson W, et al. Complete remissions of adult T-cell leukemia with anti-CD25 recombinant immunotoxin LMB-2 and chemotherapy to block immunogenicity. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:310–8.
Bota DA, Mason W, Kesari S, Magge R, Winograd B, Elias I, et al. Marizomib alone or in combination with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: Phase I/II clinical trial data. Neuro-Oncol Adv. 2021;3:vdab142.
Barnes DJ, Dutton P, Bruland Ø, Gelderblom H, Faleti A, Bühnemann C, et al. Outcomes from a mechanistic biomarker multi-arm and randomised study of liposomal MTP-PE (Mifamurtide) in metastatic and/or recurrent osteosarcoma (EuroSarc-Memos trial). BMC Cancer. 2022;22:629.
Kreitman RJ, Dearden C, Zinzani PL, Delgado J, Robak T, le Coutre PD, et al. Moxetumomab pasudotox in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia (HCL): long-term follow-up from the pivotal trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:1–11.
Lulla RR, Goldman S, Yamada T, Beattie CW, Bressler L, Pacini M, et al. Phase I trial of p28 (NSC745104), a non-HDM2-mediated peptide inhibitor of p53 ubiquitination in pediatric patients with recurrent or progressive central nervous system tumors: a Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Study. Neuro-Oncol. 2016;18:1319–25.
Cimino PJ, Huang L, Du L, Wu Y, Bishop J, Dalsing-Hernandez J, et al. Plinabulin, an inhibitor of tubulin polymerization, targets KRAS signaling through disruption of endosomal recycling. Biomed Rep. 2019;10:218–24.
Rugo HS, Trédan O, Ro J, Morales SM, Campone M, Musolino A, et al. A randomized phase II trial of ridaforolimus, dalotuzumab, and exemestane compared with ridaforolimus and exemestane in patients with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165:601–9.
Yao HP, Zhao H, Hudson R, Tong XM, Wang MH. Duocarmycin-based antibody–drug conjugates as an emerging biotherapeutic entity for targeted cancer therapy: pharmaceutical strategy and clinical progress. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26:1857–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EFG, AG and KHG drafted the manuscript; EGG and KHG completed the figures and tables; All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Giurini, E.F., Godla, A. & Gupta, K.H. Redefining bioactive small molecules from microbial metabolites as revolutionary anticancer agents. Cancer Gene Ther 31, 187–206 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-023-00715-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-023-00715-x