Apatinib prevents natural killer cell dysfunction to enhance the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract

Apatinib, a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated activity against a wide range of solid tumors, including advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Preclinical and preliminary clinical results have confirmed the synergistic antitumor effects of apatinib in combination with anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade. However, the immunologic mechanism of this combination therapy remains unclear. Here, using a syngeneic HCC mouse model, we demonstrated that treatment with apatinib resulted in attenuation of tumor growth and increased tumor vessel normalization. Moreover, our results indicated that natural killer cells, but not CD4+ or CD8+ T cells mediated the therapeutic efficacy of apatinib in HCC mouse models. As expected, the combined administration of apatinib and anti-PD-1 antibody into tumor-bearing mice generated potent immune responses resulting in a remarkable reduction of tumor growth. Furthermore, increased interferon-γ and decreased tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 levels were observed, suggesting the potential benefits of combination therapy with PD-1 blockade and apatinib in HCC.

Introduction

Liver cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality [1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for about 85–90% of all primary liver malignancies, and the common clinical risk factors include chronic infection with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus, along with heavy alcohol intake, steatohepatitis, and diabetes [2]. Despite multimodal therapy, the overall survival of patients with HCC has not improved significantly over the past two decades [1,2,3].

In China, most patients with HCC are diagnosed at advanced stages, and systemic therapy is the only treatment option for patients who have unresectable or advanced HCC [4]. In 2018, lenvatinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the treatment of HCC, whereas sorafenib remains an effective frontline treatment option since 2008 [5, 6]. However, during the last 10 years, most TKIs have failed to improve or parallel the efficacy of sorafenib as frontline treatment, or increase overall survival in trials of second-line treatment compared with placebo [7,8,9]. Therefore, there is an unmet need for effective systemic treatment options for patients with advanced HCC, particularly after failure of first-line therapy.

Recently, immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, enabling effective control of previously incurable and highly aggressive cancers. Antibodies against anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand, PD-L1, are widely being used for the treatment of malignancies, including HCC [10, 11]. Compared to TKIs, they are effective regardless of the response to prior therapies and viral status, and can elicit a durable adaptive immune response [10]. Notably, nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 (αPD-1) antibody, received accelerated FDA approval as second-line treatment for advanced HCC after failure or intolerance to sorafenib, based on the results from two single-arm studies CheckMate 040 [12]. However, majority of the patients remain refractory, highlighting the need to develop strategies to increase the efficacy of immunotherapy. The combination of targeted therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors has been tested in early phase trials, such as sorafenib (NCT03211416, NCT01658878, and NCT02988440), lenvatinib (NCT03418922 and NCT03006926), and other TKIs in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors [13].

Apatinib, a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-TKI, has been approved as a third-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer [14], and has shown promising therapeutic effects against diverse tumor types, including HCC [15,16,17]. In addition, preliminary results of a phase Ib clinical trial of SHR-1210 (a clinically available αPD-1 antibody) in combination with apatinib have shown promising efficacy in patients with advanced HCC [18]. Subsequently, a multicenter, phase II trial is currently underway to confirm these results (NCT03463876). However, the synergistic effect between apatinib and αPD-1 therapy in HCC has not been explored completely.

Studies have shown that antiangiogenic agents that target tumor blood vessels are capable of pruning immature vessels and normalizing the vasculature, thus facilitating the delivery of drugs and immune effector cells into the tumor immunologic microenvironment (TIME) [19]. Previous clinical data support the notion that inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) signaling may improve T-cell-mediated antitumor immunity [20, 21]. However, our results showed that natural killer (NK) cells, but not CD4+ or CD8+ T cells mediated the therapeutic efficacy of apatinib in HCC mouse models. Besides, apatinib not only efficiently inhibited tumor growth and angiogenesis in HCC, but also elicited NK cell activation. Furthermore, the combined administration of apatinib and αPD-1 antibody into tumor-bearing mice resulted in a remarkable increase in antitumor efficacy. Overall, our preclinical findings suggest the use of apatinib as a tumor-conditioning agent that may increase the efficacy of immunotherapy via effectively suppressing angiogenesis, while increasing NK cell-mediated antitumor immune activity in an HCC mouse model.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and reagents

The mouse HCC line Hepa1-6 was maintained in our laboratory and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The authenticity of the cell line was verified by short tandem repeat analysis (Cellcook Biotech Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China). Prior to use, cells were confirmed to be mycoplasma-negative using the Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Apatinib (YN-968D1) was provided by Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd. (Lianyungang, China), and diluted in 0.5% (w/v) carboxymethyl cellulose.

Animal tumor experiments

Five-to-six-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Beijing HFK Bioscience Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) and kept in an animal facility under pathogen-free conditions. The handing of mice and experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines for experimental animals approved by the Ethical Committee of Tianjin Medicine University.

To evaluate the effect of apatinib on primary tumor growth, 1 × 106 Hepa1-6 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flanks of mice. On day 7 post injection, the mice were randomly divided into two or four groups (n = 6 or 7 mice per group), and orally administered carboxymethyl cellulose or apatinib (100 mg/kg) daily for 4 weeks, or intraperitoneally injected with αPD-1 antibody (200 μg/mouse) every 5 days (total of 5 times). Tumor volume and weight were measured [tumor volume = (length × width2)/2] after sacrifice of mice.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) assays

Tumor specimens were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated, paraffin-embedded, and sliced into 5 μm sections. IHC staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Zhongshan Golden Bridge, Beijing, China). Antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, London, UK) or Cell Signaling Technology (CST, Danvers, MA, USA) as follows: CD31 (Abcam, ab9498), alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA; Abcam, ab32575), Ki-67 (Abcam, ab16667), PD-L1 (CST, #64988), and natural cytotoxicity triggering receptor 1 (NCR1; Abcam, ab199128).

For IF staining, the tissue slides were unmasked using EDTA solution and co-stained with mouse anti-CD31 and rabbit anti-α-SMA antibodies. The sections were then incubated sequentially with FITC-labeled anti-mouse IgG (bs-0296G; Biosynthesis Biotechnology, Beijing, China), followed by incubation with Fluor555-labeled anti-rabbit IgG (CST, #4413). Next, the tissue sections were stained with DAPI (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for nuclear staining, and visualized and imaged under a positive fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). FITC, Fluor555, and DAPI images were taken under the same field.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Mouse VEGFA, interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β levels in the supernatants were detected using an ELISA kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Dakewe, Beijing, China).

Isolation of leukocytes

Tumors were harvested and minced using a razor blade, followed by digestion with collagenase IV (0.2 mg/mL; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), dispase (2 mg/mL, Life Technologies), and DNase I (0.1 mg/mL, Life Technologies) in RPMI-1640 medium (without any supplements) for 30 min at 37 °C. The cell suspension was filtered using a cell strainer (70 μm) and washed in washing buffer (phosphate buffered saline containing 2 mM EDTA and 2% FBS).

Flow cytometry

After blockade of Fc receptors by incubation with CD16/32 Ab (clone93; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for 30 min, the leukocytes were stained with the following extracellular fluorescence antibodies for 30 min at 4 °C: CD45 [allophycocyanin (APC)/Fire™ 750, clone 30-F11], CD11b (APC, clone M1/70), Gr-1 (PerCP/Cy5.5, clone RB6-8C5), F4/80 (FITC, clone BM8), CD3e (PerCP, clone 145-2c11), NK1.1 [phycoerythrin (PE), clone PK136], CD4 (Alexa Fluor® 488, clone GK1.5), CD8a (APC, clone 53-6.7), CD69 (PE/Cy7, clone H1.2F3), NKG2D (FITC, clone C7), NKG2A (APC, clone 16A11), T-cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain (TIGIT; PE/Cy7, clone 1G9), PD-1 (PE/Cy7, clone 29 F.1A12), or isotype controls. For CD107a staining, leukocytes were incubated with 10 ng/mL brefeldin A (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) and CD107a (PE/Cy7, clone1D4B) for 4 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator, followed by staining for extracellular markers. All the above antibodies were purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA). Data were acquired using a BD FACSAria II instrument (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software. All experiments were performed in triplicates. Data were presented as means ± standard deviation. Two-tailed Student’s t test, one-way single factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA), or two-way ANOVA were performed to determine statistical significance. The differences were considered significant for p values < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001.

Results

Apatinib decreases tumor growth in HCC mouse model

Since HCC is characterized as a hyper-vascular tumor, suppressing angiogenesis may exert strong antitumor effects [22]. Here, we analyzed the in vivo antitumor activity of apatinib in an HCC Hepa1-6 mouse model (Fig. 1a). As shown in Fig. 1b, administration of apatinib (100 mg/kg/day, equivalent to the clinical dosage of 750 mg) significantly altered tumor growth. Both tumor weight and volume decreased compared with the control group (Fig. 1c). In addition, Ki-67 expression was found to be significantly reduced in apatinib-treated tumor specimens, as indicated by IHC staining (Fig. 1d). These results demonstrate the antitumor activity of apatinib in the HCC mouse model.

Fig. 1: The therapeutic efficacy of apatinib in Hep1-6 C57BL/6 mouse model.
figure1

a The experimental scheme of apatinib therapy. b Photographs collected from the tumor specimens in each group. c Measurement of tumor volume and weight. d Ki-67 staining and quantification by IHC. e The serum level of the angiogenesis-related cytokine VEGFA. f The serum levels of the inflammatory cytokines, TGF-β, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-6. Experiments were repeated at least two times (n = 6 mice/group). Data are presented as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

To further characterize the effects of apatinib, the release of angiogenic and inflammatory cytokines in the serum of HCC mice was analyzed. The serum level of VEGFA, a well-known pro-angiogenic factor produced by fibroblasts, inflammatory cells, and tumor cells [23], was significantly reduced in apatinib-treated mice (Fig. 1e). TNF-α and IL-6, important inflammatory response mediators produced by monocytes and macrophages, and TGF-β, an immune-suppressive cytokine synthesized mainly by Tregs (regulatory T cells) and tumor cells, have been shown to promote angiogenesis. However, IFN-γ, an important proinflammatory cytokine secreted by activated T cells and NK cells, has been reported to inhibit tumor angiogenesis directly and indirectly [24, 25]. Here, our results showed that the levels of TGF-β, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-6 remained unaffected (Fig. 1f).

Apatinib impairs tumor angiogenesis and normalizes the remaining vasculature

Next, we analyzed the changes in tumor vascularization in the HCC mouse model. Results showed that apatinib decreased the relative CD31+ vascular area in the tumors of mouse analyzed at the termination end point (Fig. 2a). These findings indicate the sustained antiangiogenic activity of apatinib in HCC. Previous research has suggested that coverage of endothelial cells by pericytes may be favorable for tumor vessel normalization [26]. Next, we then analyzed vascular maturation by α-SMA staining to visualize pericytes. Both IHC and IF analysis showed that the perivascular cell coverage of the tumor blood vessels (calculated as the ratio of α-SMA+ or α-SMA+ CD31+ cells in CD31+ population) was significantly higher in the apatinib-treated group compared to that in the control group (Fig. 2b, c). These results indicate that apatinib effectively suppresses angiogenesis while increasing pericyte coverage of the remaining blood vessels in an HCC mouse model.

Fig. 2: The effects of apatinib on angiogenesis and vascular normalization in vivo.
figure2

a, b CD31 and α-SMA staining and quantification by IHC. Images were obtained at ×400 magnification. c Representative images of endothelial cells (CD31-positive; green) attached by pericytes (α-SMA-positive; red), as indicated by IFC staining. Images were obtained at ×200 magnification. Data are presented as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Apatinib promotes intratumoral NK cell accumulation

It has been demonstrated that vascular normalization may facilitate the trafficking and function of immune cells, especially effector T cells in various tumors [27, 28]. Thus, we assessed the intratumoral immunological changes post apatinib treatment by flow cytometry. Interestingly, apatinib treatment significantly altered the proportion and number of NK cells, but not CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in the tumor (Fig. 3a). Consistently, increased NK cell infiltration was also observed, as indicated by IHC staining of NCR1 (or NKp46) (Fig. 3b). In addition, we analyzed the effects of apatinib on immunosuppressive cells, including tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which could potentially attenuate or inhibit NK cell-mediated antitumor immune response in TIME. We found that the percentages and number of both CD11b+F4/80+ TAMs and CD11b+Gr-1+ MDSCs showed no significant differences between the apatinib-treated and control groups (Fig. 3c). These findings suggest that apatinib stimulates NK cell infiltration in tumors.

Fig. 3: The changes in tumor-infiltrating immune cells after apatinib therapy in vivo.
figure3

a Flow cytometric analysis of NK (CD3NK1.1+), T (CD3+NK1.1), CD4+ (CD3+NK1.1CD4+CD8), and CD8+ (CD3+NK1.1CD4CD8+) T cells in the tumor samples. b Staining and quantification of NCR+ cells. Images were obtained at ×400 magnification. c Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs (CD11b+F4/80+) and MDSCs (CD11b+Gr-1+) in the tumor samples. Data are presented as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05.

Apatinib activates tumor-infiltrating NK cells

NK cells are essential antitumor effector cells, and dysfunction of NK cells contributes to the progression of HCC [29]. In this study, treatment with apatinib increased the proportion of cells positive for CD69 (active marker) and CD107a (marker for degranulation), indicating that apatinib significantly increases NK cell cytotoxicity (Fig. 4a). The activity of NK cells is modulated by a range of germline-encoded inhibitory and activating receptors that recognize their respective ligand(s) on target cells or antigen-presenting cells, and is regulated by an integrated balance of activation and inhibitory signals [30]. Here, in the apatinib-treated group, NK cell activation was observed, as indicated by higher levels of the activating receptor NKG2D and lower levels of the co-inhibitory receptor TIGHT (Fig. 4b). However, the levels of the inhibitory receptor NKG2A and immune checkpoint receptor PD-1 were not found to be significantly altered (Fig. 4b). Therefore, these data imply that apatinib reverses the decreased effector function of NK cells in a tumor microenvironment.

Fig. 4: Functional changes of NK cells in TILs after apatinib therapy in vivo.
figure4

a Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies analysis of the activating maker CD69 and the degranulation molecule CD107a. b Representative flow cytometry plots and frequencies analysis of the activating receptor NKG2D, the inhibitory receptor NKG2A, and the negative immunomodulators or co-inhibitory receptors, PD-1 and TIGIT. Data are presented as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Apatinib improves the antitumor activity of PD-1 blockage in HCC mouse model

We next assessed the efficacy of αPD-1 treatment alone or in combination with apatinib in the HCC mouse model (Fig. 5a). As expected, treatment with apatinib or αPD-1 alone showed comparable efficacy of tumor inhibition, while a combination treatment of apatinib and αPD-1 showed a significant delay in tumor growth compared with the control group (Fig. 5b–d). These data were in line with the results of phase Ib trials of apatinib and SHR-1210 (αPD-1 antibody) combination therapy that demonstrated manageable toxicity and encouraging clinical activity in patients with advanced HCC [18].

Fig. 5: The therapeutic efficacy of apatinib combined with PD-1 blockade.
figure5

a The experimental scheme of apatinib therapy combined with PD-1 blockade. b Photographs collected from the tumors in each group. c Measurement of tumor volume and weight. d Individual volumes of tumors treated as indicated. Experiments were repeated at least two times (NS, n = 7; Apa, n = 6; αPD-1, n = 7; Apa + αPD-1, n = 6). Data are presented as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Furthermore, consistent with previous findings, the VEGFA serum level was reduced in the apatinib-treated group, as well as in both αPD-1 blockade groups with or without apatinib (Fig. 6a). Besides, a similar decline in PD-L1 expression in the tumor tissues was observed, as indicated by IHC staining (Fig. 6b). However, the changes in intratumoral PD-L1 expression following antiangiogenic therapy or immunotherapy remain controversial [28, 31, 32]. In addition, no differences in TGF-β levels were observed among groups. The levels of IFN-γ increased, but those of TNF-α and IL-6 reduced in the αPD-1 and apatinib combination therapy group as compared to the apatinib-treated and control groups (Fig. 6c). These data indicate the potential benefits of combination therapy of PD-1 blockade and apatinib for the treatment of HCC.

Fig. 6: The changes in cytokine and PD-L1 expression after combination therapy with apatinib and PD-1 blockade.
figure6

a Expression of the angiogenesis-related cytokine VEGFA. b Representative IHC images of staining and quantification of PD-L1. All images were obtained at ×400 magnification. c The serum levels of the inflammatory cytokines, TGF-β, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-6. Data are presented as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Discussion

Angiogenesis is increasingly used as an immune modulator with potential for combinatorial use with checkpoint blockade [27, 28, 31]. Here, we reported that treatment with apatinib increased intratumoral NK cell infiltration and activated NK cells, following tumor growth attenuation and tumor vessel normalization, and generated potent immune responses when used in combination with PD-1 blockade in the HCC mouse model. Our results, along with previous preliminary clinical findings [18, 33], underscore the potential benefits of combining PD-1 blockade with apatinib in HCC.

Like CD8+ T cells, NK cells exert antitumor effects and play a crucial role in tumor immune surveillance. They are functionally inhibited in the tumor microenvironment [29, 30]. Moreover, the decreased percentage and dysfunction of liver NK cells have been shown to contribute to the development and progression of HCC, suggesting the critical role of NK cells [29, 34]. In our HCC mouse model, apatinib treatment increased intratumoral NK cell proportion, and enhanced the expression of NK cell activation marker CD69 and cytotoxicity molecule CD107a, indicating that NK cells play a critical role in mediating the therapeutic effects of apatinib. In addition, the expression of the activating receptor NKG2D on NK cells was significantly upregulated after apatinib treatment, while that of the co-inhibitory receptor TIGIT was downregulated, suggesting that apatinib has the ability to reverse NK cell dysfunction in tumors.

Simultaneously, we also analyzed other immune components. Previous reports [28] have suggested that a low dose of apatinib (60 mg/kg) increases infiltration of CD8+ T cells and hinders the recruitment of TAM in mouse lung cancer models. In our study, there were no significant alterations in the levels of CD8+ T cells and TAMs after apatinib treatment (100 mg/kg), although a similarly high perivascular cell coverage was observed. However, except for the dosage, the observation time and tumor type were different between the two studies. Moreover, preliminary results from a phase Ib clinical trial suggested a recommended phase II dose of 250 mg/day for apatinib in combination with SHR-1210, which was one third of the recommended dose of 750 mg/day for phase III trials. Therefore, more number of preclinical and clinical studies to determine the optimal dose of antiangiogenic agents is needed to explore the role of immune modulation and help elicit stronger NK cell responses.

Since αPD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy has led to a remarkable breakthrough in cancer treatment, its limited efficacy has prompted preclinical and clinical studies to extend the benefits to a larger population by combining it with conventional treatments. Antiangiogenic drugs have the potential to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy, which is based on the theory that they contribute to an immunostimulatory TIME and regulate tumor vessel normalization [31, 35]. Therefore, several early phase studies are increasingly being conducted to explore the safety and tolerability of antiangiogenic TKIs, such as sorafenib (NCT03211416, NCT01658878, and NCT02988440), lenvatinib (NCT03418922 and NCT03006926), and apatinib (NCT03463876) in patients with HCC [13, 18]. Our findings strongly indicate that apatinib has the potential to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of αPD-1. In addition, Hsu et al. revealed that PD-1/PD-L1 blockade elicited an antitumor NK cell response [36]. Hence, it appears that coactivation of NK cells is required for mediating the synergistic antitumor effects of apatinib and αPD-1. However, further studies are needed for detailed mechanistic evidences.

Increased clinical use of checkpoint inhibitors results in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Cytokines associated with T-cell activation and autoimmune disease usually contribute to irAEs [37]. Thus, in the present study, we assessed the serum levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-6. A slight increase in IFN-γ, and decrease in TNF-α and IL-6 level was observed in the αPD-1 and apatinib combination therapy group. Interestingly, emerging studies have suggested that TNF-α and IL-6 contribute to resistance to αPD-1/PD-L1 therapy [38, 39]. Hence, whether a decrease in the serum level of TNF-α or IL-6 contributes to the synergistic effect of antiangiogenic drugs combined with immunotherapy requires further investigation.

In summary, our findings support the notion that antiangiogenic agents enhance host antitumor immunity, and might be involved in mediating the therapeutic effects of certain immunotherapies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that NK cells, but not CD8+ T cells play a critical role in mediating the therapeutic effects of apatinib. However, further investigation in future clinical studies is required to validate our results.

References

  1. 1.

    Villanueva A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1450–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sartorius K, Sartorius B, Aldous C, Govender PS, Madiba TE. Global and country underestimation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2012 and its implications. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39:284–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1118–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Park JW, Chen M, Colombo M, Roberts LR, Schwartz M, Chen PJ, et al. Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death: the BRIDGE Study. Liver Int. 2015;35:2155–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:378–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391:1163–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cheng AL, Kang YK, Lin DY, Park JW, Kudo M, Qin S, et al. Sunitinib versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular cancer: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4067–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Llovet JM, Decaens T, Raoul JL, Boucher E, Kudo M, Chang C, et al. Brivanib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were intolerant to sorafenib or for whom sorafenib failed: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-PS study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3509–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhu AX, Rosmorduc O, Evans TR, Ross PJ, Santoro A, Carrilho FJ, et al. SEARCH: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sorafenib plus erlotinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:559–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Prieto J, Melero I, Sangro B. Immunological landscape and immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12:681–700.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nishida N, Kudo M. Role of immune checkpoint blockade in the treatment for human hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis. 2017;35:618–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    El-Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T, Crocenzi TS, Kudo M, Hsu C, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2492–502.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Nishida N, Kudo M. Immune checkpoint blockade for the treatment of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2018;48:622–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Roviello G, Ravelli A, Polom K, Petrioli R, Marano L, Marrelli D, et al. Apatinib: a novel receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016;372:187–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Scott AJ, Messersmith WA, Jimeno A. Apatinib: a promising oral antiangiogenic agent in the treatment of multiple solid tumors. Drugs Today (Barc). 2015;51:223–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Xue JM, Astere M, Zhong MX, Lin H, Shen J, Zhu YX. Efficacy and safety of apatinib treatment for gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:6119–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liang Q, Kong L, Du Y, Zhu X, Tian J. Antitumorigenic and antiangiogenic efficacy of apatinib in liver cancer evaluated by multimodality molecular imaging. Exp Mol Med. 2019;51:76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Xu J, Zhang Y, Jia R, Yue C, Chang L, Liu R, et al. Anti-PD-1 antibody SHR-1210 combined with apatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric, or esophagogastric junction cancer: an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:515–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Motz GT, Coukos G. The parallel lives of angiogenesis and immunosuppression: cancer and other tales. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:702–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hodi FS, Lawrence D, Lezcano C, Wu X, Zhou J, Sasada T, et al. Bevacizumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:632–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wallin JJ, Bendell JC, Funke R, Sznol M, Korski K, Jones S, et al. Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab enhances antigen-specific T-cell migration in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12624.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liu K, Zhang X, Xu W, Chen J, Yu J, Gamble JR, et al. Targeting the vasculature in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: starving versus normalizing blood supply. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017;8:e98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Apte RS, Chen DS, Ferrara N. VEGF in signaling and disease: beyond discovery and development. Cell. 2019;176:1248–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    De Palma M, Biziato D, Petrova TV. Microenvironmental regulation of tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:457–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Landskron G, De la Fuente M, Thuwajit P, Thuwajit C, Hermoso MA. Chronic inflammation and cytokines in the tumor microenvironment. J Immunol Res. 2014;2014:149185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jain RK. Antiangiogenesis strategies revisited: from starving tumors to alleviating hypoxia. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:605–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Huang Y, Yuan J, Righi E, Kamoun WS, Ancukiewicz M, Nezivar J, et al. Vascular normalizing doses of antiangiogenic treatment reprogram the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and enhance immunotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:17561–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhao S, Ren S, Jiang T, Zhu B, Li X, Zhao C, et al. Low-dose apatinib optimizes tumor microenvironment and potentiates antitumor effect of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7:630–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sun C, Sun H, Zhang C, Tian Z. NK cell receptor imbalance and NK cell dysfunction in HBV infection and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Mol Immunol. 2015;12:292–302.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Krasnova Y, Putz EM, Smyth MJ, Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes F. Bench to bedside: NK cells and control of metastasis. Clin Immunol. 2017;177:50–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Schmittnaegel M, Rigamonti N, Kadioglu E, Cassara A, Wyser Rmili C, Kiialainen A, et al. Dual angiopoietin-2 and VEGFA inhibition elicits antitumor immunity that is enhanced by PD-1 checkpoint blockade. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaak9670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Liu XD, Hoang A, Zhou L, Kalra S, Yetil A, Sun M, et al. Resistance to antiangiogenic therapy is associated with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:1017–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Liang L, Wen Y, Hu R, Wang L, Xia Y, Hu C, et al. Safety and efficacy of PD-1 blockade-activated multiple antigen-specific cellular therapy alone or in combination with apatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: a pooled analysis of two prospective trials. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019;68:1467–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhang QF, Yin WW, Xia Y, Yi YY, He QF, Wang X, et al. Liver-infiltrating CD11b(-)CD27(-) NK subsets account for NK-cell dysfunction in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and are associated with tumor progression. Cell Mol Immunol. 2017;14:819–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Allen E, Jabouille A, Rivera LB, Lodewijckx I, Missiaen R, Steri V, et al. Combined antiangiogenic and anti-PD-L1 therapy stimulates tumor immunity through HEV formation. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaak9679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hsu J, Hodgins JJ, Marathe M, Nicolai CJ, Bourgeois-Daigneault MC, Trevino TN, et al. Contribution of NK cells to immunotherapy mediated by PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. J Clin Investig. 2018;128:4654–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gupta KK, Khan MA, Singh SK. Constitutive inflammatory cytokine storm: a major threat to human health. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2020;40:19–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mace TA, Shakya R, Pitarresi JR, Swanson B, McQuinn CW, Loftus S, et al. IL-6 and PD-L1 antibody blockade combination therapy reduces tumour progression in murine models of pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2018;67:320–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bertrand F, Montfort A, Marcheteau E, Imbert C, Gilhodes J, Filleron T, et al. TNFalpha blockade overcomes resistance to anti-PD-1 in experimental melanoma. Nat Commun. 2017;8:2256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81703786; to YY) and the Tianjin Science and Technology Committee (No. 18JCZDJC36700; to ZP).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhanyu Pan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Wang, C., Sun, H. et al. Apatinib prevents natural killer cell dysfunction to enhance the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Gene Ther (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-020-0186-7

Download citation

Search

Quick links