Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Clinical Studies

TAS-102, Irinotecan, and bevacizumab in pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (TABAsCO), a phase II clinical trial

Abstract

Background

The efficacy of FOLFIRI plus an antiangiogenesis biologic agent as 2nd line therapy for metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma is limited. TAS-102 is a novel oral antimetabolite with a distinct mechanism of action from fluoropyrimidines. We evaluated the antitumour efficacy of TAS-102, irinotecan and bevacizumab in patients with pre-treated, advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma in a multicenter, phase II, single-arm study.

Methods

Patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma who had progressed after oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine and were eligible for treatment with bevacizumab were treated with irinotecan, bevacizumab, and TAS-102 in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

We enrolled 35 evaluable patients. The study was positive. The median PFS was 7.9 (90% CI 6.2–11.8) months (vs. 6 months in historical control, p = 0.018). The median overall survival was 16.5 (90% CI 9.8–17.5) months. Sixty-seven per cent of patients experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events. The most common toxicities were hematological (neutropenia) and gastrointestinal (diarrhoea, nausea, and vomiting).

Conclusions

Irinotecan, TAS-102 and bevacizumab is an active 2nd line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. Neutropenia is common and can affect dose density/intensity mandating use of G-CSF. A randomized study versus standard-of-care therapy is warranted.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04109924.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: CONSORT Diagram.
Fig. 2: Survival Outcomes.
Fig. 3: Antitumor Efficacy.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

De-identified clinical data will be available upon request to the corresponding author. The raw RNA sequencing data can be accessed from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE275628.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:233–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D, Osterlund P, Greil R, Van Cutsem E, et al. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:29–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Cutsem E, Tabernero J, Lakomy R, Prenen H, Prausova J, Macarulla T, et al. Addition of aflibercept to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan improves survival in a phase III randomized trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3499–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tabernero J, Yoshino T, Cohn AL, Obermannova R, Bodoky G, Garcia-Carbonero R, et al. Ramucirumab versus placebo in combination with second-line FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that progressed during or after first-line therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine (RAISE): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:499–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bikov KA, Mullins CD, Hung A, Seal B, Onukwugha E, Hanna N. Patterns of biologics use across treatment lines in elderly (age >65) medicare patients with metastatic colon cancer. oncologist. 2016;21:676–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrams TA, Meyer G, Schrag D, Meyerhardt JA, Moloney J, Fuchs CS. Chemotherapy usage patterns in a US-wide cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:djt371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanaka N, Sakamoto K, Okabe H, Fujioka A, Yamamura K, Nakagawa F, et al. Repeated oral dosing of TAS-102 confers high trifluridine incorporation into DNA and sustained antitumor activity in mouse models. Oncol Rep. 2014;32:2319–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fukushima M, Suzuki N, Emura T, Yano S, Kazuno H, Tada Y, et al. Structure and activity of specific inhibitors of thymidine phosphorylase to potentiate the function of antitumor 2’-deoxyribonucleosides. Biochem Pharm. 2000;59:1227–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Emura T, Murakami Y, Nakagawa F, Fukushima M, Kitazato K. A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells. Int J Mol Med. 2004;13:545–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuoka K, Iimori M, Niimi S, Tsukihara H, Watanabe S, Kiyonari S, et al. Trifluridine induces p53-dependent sustained G2 phase arrest with its massive misincorporation into DNA and few DNA strand breaks. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14:1004–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alruwaili MM, Zonneville J, Naranjo MN, Serio H, Melendy T, Straubinger RM, et al. A synergistic two-drug therapy specifically targets a DNA repair dysregulation that occurs in p53-deficient colorectal and pancreatic cancers. Cell Rep Med. 2024:101434.

  13. Suzuki N, Nakagawa F, Nukatsuka M, Fukushima M. Trifluorothymidine exhibits potent antitumor activity via the induction of DNA double-strand breaks. Exp Ther Med. 2011;2:393–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Emura T, Suzuki N, Yamaguchi M, Ohshimo H, Fukushima M. A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA. Int J Oncol. 2004;25:571–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, Yoshino T, Garcia-Carbonero R, Mizunuma N, et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N. Engl J Med. 2015;372:1909–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prager GW, Taieb J, Fakih M, Ciardiello F, Van Cutsem E, Elez E, et al. Trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N. Engl J Med. 2023;388:1657–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Cutsem E, Danielewicz I, Saunders MP, Pfeiffer P, Argiles G, Borg C, et al. Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy: the randomized TASCO1 study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1160–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nukatsuka M, Nakagawa F, Saito H, Sakata M, Uchida J, Takechi T. Efficacy of combination chemotherapy using a novel oral chemotherapeutic agent, TAS-102, with irinotecan hydrochloride on human colorectal and gastric cancer xenografts. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:1437–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsuoka K, Takechi T. Combined efficacy and mechanism of trifluridine and SN-38 in a 5-FU-resistant human colorectal cancer cell lines. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7:2577–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Varghese AM, Cardin DB, Hersch J, Benson AB, Hochster HS, Makris L, et al. Phase I study of trifluridine/tipiracil plus irinotecan and bevacizumab in advanced gastrointestinal tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:1555–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chiorean EG, Guthrie KA, Philip PA, Swisher EM, Jalikis F, Pishvaian MJ, et al. Randomized phase II study of PARP inhibitor ABT-888 (Veliparib) with modified FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI as second-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer: SWOG S1513. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:6314–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Alese OB, Gbolahan OB, Diab M, Botrus G, Coleman K, McCook-Veal A, et al. OniLon: Phase II trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) and nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:3580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van de Haar J, Ma X, Ooft SN, van der Helm PW, Hoes LR, Mainardi S, et al. Codon-specific KRAS mutations predict survival benefit of trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2023;29:605–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshino T, Van Cutsem E, Li J, Shen L, Kim TW, Sriuranpong V, et al. Effect of KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutations on survival with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. ESMO Open. 2022;7:100511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tabernero J, Taieb J, Fakih M, Prager GW, Van Cutsem E, Ciardiello F, et al. Impact of KRAS(G12) mutations on survival with trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: post hoc analysis of the phase III SUNLIGHT trial. ESMO Open. 2024;9:102945.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Giampieri R, Zizzi A, Bittoni A, Pecci F, Giglio E, Giulia M, et al. P-27 Retrospective observational analysis of p53 mutational status as a prognostic factor in TAS-102 treated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:S98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zonneville J, Wang M, Alruwaili MM, Smith B, Melnick M, Eng KH, et al. Selective therapeutic strategy for p53-deficient cancer by targeting dysregulation in DNA repair. Commun Biol. 2021;4:862.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Walden D, Deshmukh S, Batalini F, Zheng-Lin B, Wu S, Xiu J, et al. Chemotherapeutic sensitivity in colorectal cancer expressing low RNA of wild type homologous recombination genes. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:3531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Spurr LF, Martinez CA, Katipally RR, Iyer SC, Pugh SA, Bridgewater JA, et al. A proliferative subtype of colorectal liver metastases exhibits hypersensitivity to cytotoxic chemotherapy. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2022;6:72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Takahashi K, Yoshisue K, Chiba M, Nakanishi T, Tamai I. Involvement of concentrative nucleoside transporter 1 in intestinal absorption of trifluridine using human small intestinal epithelial cells. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104:3146–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Takahashi K, Yoshisue K, Chiba M, Nakanishi T, Tamai I. Contribution of equilibrative nucleoside transporter(s) to intestinal basolateral and apical transports of anticancer trifluridine. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2018;39:38–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sakamoto K, Yokogawa T, Ueno H, Oguchi K, Kazuno H, Ishida K, et al. Crucial roles of thymidine kinase 1 and deoxyUTPase in incorporating the antineoplastic nucleosides trifluridine and 2’-deoxy-5-fluorouridine into DNA. Int J Oncol. 2015;46:2327–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kataoka Y, Iimori M, Niimi S, Tsukihara H, Wakasa T, Saeki H, et al. Cytotoxicity of trifluridine correlates with the thymidine kinase 1 expression level. Sci Rep. 2019;9:7964.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Edahiro K, Iimori M, Kobunai T, Morikawa-Ichinose T, Miura D, Kataoka Y, et al. Thymidine kinase 1 loss confers trifluridine resistance without affecting 5-fluorouracil metabolism and cytotoxicity. Mol Cancer Res. 2018;16:1483–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yoshino T, Yamazaki K, Shinozaki E, Komatsu Y, Nishina T, Baba H, et al. Relationship between thymidine kinase 1 expression and trifluridine/tipiracil therapy in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018;17:e719–e32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yoshisue K, Takahashi K, Okayama T, Yamashita F, Chiba M, editors. Investigation of transporters that play an important role in urinary secretion of thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor combined with a novel anti-cancer agent of TAS-102. DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS; 2015: TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD 4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON.

  38. Suenaga M, Schirripa M, Cao S, Zhang W, Yang D, Dadduzio V, et al. Potential role of polymorphisms in the transporter genes ENT1 and MATE1/OCT2 in predicting TAS-102 efficacy and toxicity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2017;86:197–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Suenaga M, Schirripa M, Cao S, Zhang W, Yang D, Murgioni S, et al. Genetic variants of DNA repair-related genes predict efficacy of TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:1015–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

TAS-102 was provided for free by Taiho Oncology. This work was partially supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) grants R37CA282430 to Dr. Christos Fountzilas and P30CA016056 involving the use of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center’s Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Genomics Shared Resource, and the Pathology Network Shared Resource. The initial results of this study were presented in the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2023 Annual Meeting (Abstract 3590, Poster 290).

Funding

This study was funded by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Oncology Research Program through a grant provided by Taiho Oncology. The funder had no role in the design or interpretation of study results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Patrick Boland - conceptualization, formal analysis, funding acquisition, data curation, methodology, project administration, and writing (review and editing), Sarbajit Mukherjee - data curation, and writing (review and editing), Iman Imanirad - project administration, data curation, and writing (review and editing), Namrata Vijayvergia project administration, data curation, and writing (review and editing), Seth Cohen - data curation, and writing (review and editing), Medhavi Gupta - methodology, and writing (review and editing), Renuka Iyer - data curation, and writing (review and editing), Andrei Bakin - formal analysis, and writing (review and editing), Jianxin Wang - formal analysis, data curation, methodology, and writing (review and editing), Sarah Chatley - data curation, and writing (review and editing), Beth Cahill - data curation, and writing (review and editing), Deepak Vadehra - data curation, and writing (review and editing), Kristopher Attwood - formal analysis, data curation, methodology, and writing (review and editing), Howard Hochster - data curation, and writing (review and editing), Christos Fountzilas - formal analysis, funding acquisition, data curation, methodology, project administration, and writing (original draft, review and editing).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Fountzilas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr. Christos Fountzilas has research support for this clinical trial from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Oncology Research Program (paid to the institute). He has research support from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Foundation, Taiho Oncology, Pfizer Inc, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (paid to the institute) unrelated to this study. Dr. Sarbajit Mukherjee has received research funding from Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals (paid to the institute) unrelated to this study. Dr. Iman Imanirad has received advisory board compensation from Eisai Co, Ltd, unrelated to this study.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki principles and approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) from all participating institutions (Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Moffitt Cancer Center, and Fox Chase Comprehensive Cancer Center). All patients provided informed consent prior to study participation. All patients providing tumor samples for whole transcriptome sequencing (de-identified Roswell Park IRB-approved protocols BDR 155422 and BDR 151721) had provided universal informed consent for use of tumor samples in research.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boland, P.M., Mukherjee, S., Imanirad, I. et al. TAS-102, Irinotecan, and bevacizumab in pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (TABAsCO), a phase II clinical trial. Br J Cancer (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02845-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02845-x

Search

Quick links