Abstract
While AI holds immense potential for accelerating advances in oncology, we must be intentional in developing and applying these technologies responsibly, equitably, and ethically. One path forward is for cancer care providers and researchers to be among the architects of AI and its adoption in medicine. Given the limitations of traditional top-down, hypothesis-driven design in an exponentially expanding data universe, on one hand, and the danger of spiraling into artificial ignorance (ai) from rushing into a purely ‘synthetic’ method on the other, this article proposes a ‘scienthetic’ method that synergizes AI with human wisdom. Tracing philosophical underpinnings of the scientific method from Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle to the present, it examines the critical juncture at which AI stands to either augment or undermine new knowledge. The scienthetic method seeks to harness the power and capabilities of AI responsibly, equitably, and ethically to transcend the limitations of both the traditional scientific method and purely synthetic methods, by intentionally weaving machine intelligence together with human wisdom.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Suter R. Aristotle and the Scientific Method. Sci Mon. 1939;49:468–72. http://www.jstor.org/stable/16892.
Eriksson M, Czene K, Vachon C, Conant EF, Hall P. Long-Term Performance of an Image-Based Short-Term Risk Model for Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:2536–45. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.01564.
Manz CR, Chen J, Liu M, Chivers C, Regli SH, Braun J, et al. Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict 180-Day Mortality for Outpatients with Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:1723–30. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4331.
Aklilu JG, Sun MW, Goel S, Bartoletti S, Rau A, Olsen G, et al. Artificial Intelligence Identifies Factors Associated with Blood Loss and Surgical Experience in Cholecystectomy. NEJM AI. 2024;1:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1056/AIoa2300088.
Budhwani KI, Patel ZH, Guenter RE, Charania AA. A hitchhiker’s guide to cancer models. Trends Biotechnol. 2022:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.04.003.
Johnson S, Parsons M, Dorff T, Moran MS, Ward JH, Cohen SA, et al. Cancer Misinformation and Harmful Information on Facebook and Other Social Media: A Brief Report. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114:1036–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab141.
Foksinska A, Crowder CM, Crouse AB, Henrikson J, Byrd WE, Rosenblatt G, et al. The precision medicine process for treating rare disease using the artificial intelligence tool mediKanren. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.910216.
Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2.
Ren F, Aliper A, Chen J, Zhao H, Rao S, Kuppe C, et al. A Small-Molecule TNIK Inhibitor Targets Fibrosis in Preclinical and Clinical Models. Nat Biotechnol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02143-0.
Acknowledgements
This and associated works were supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (TI-2321805), the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (1R43CA254493-01), The Breast Cancer Research Foundation of Alabama, and Innovate Alabama. I am also grateful to my colleagues at The Frederick National Lab for Cancer Research, The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, The O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, and the Aga Khan University Nairobi Cancer Centre for their support and collaboration. I would also like to acknowledge OpenAI ChatGPT for its critical analysis of my manuscript, exemplifying the synergy between human and machine intelligence that this article suggests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All contributions were from the single author.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
KIB’s work has been funded by the NIH, the NSF, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation of Alabama, and Innovate Alabama. He is CEO-Scientist of CerFlux and is co-inventor of issued (and pending) patents pertaining to in vitro, in silico, ex vivo, and cancer supermodel technologies.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Budhwani, K.I. The scienthetic method: from Aristotle to AI and the future of medicine. Br J Cancer (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02841-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02841-1