With an ageing population, there is an urgent need to find alternatives to current standard-of-care chemoradiation schedules in the treatment of pelvic malignancies. The gut microbiota may be exploitable, having shown a valuable role in improving patient outcomes in anticancer immunotherapy. These bacteria feed on dietary fibres, which reach the large intestine intact, resulting in the production of beneficial metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids. The gut microbiota can impact radiotherapy (RT) treatment responses and itself be altered by the radiation. Evidence is emerging that manipulation of the gut microbiota by dietary fibre supplementation can improve tumour responses and reduce normal tissue side effects following RT, although data on tumour response are limited to date. Both may be mediated by immune and non-immune effects of gut microbiota and their metabolites. Alternative approaches include use of probiotics and faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Current evidence will be reviewed regarding the use of dietary fibre interventions and gut microbiota modification in improving outcomes for pelvic RT patients. However, data regarding baseline (pre-RT) gut microbiota of RT patients and timing of dietary fibre manipulation (before or during RT) is limited, heterogenous and inconclusive, thus more robust clinical studies are required before these strategies can be applied clinically.
The incidence of pelvic malignancies increases in the elderly  and is now a significant problem due to the ageing population . The standard treatment of pelvic cancers involves either surgical removal of the tumour or organ preservation using radiotherapy-based treatments. Radiosensitising chemotherapy may be given concurrently to improve patients’ survival, but this can lead to increased severity of adverse effects . In patients over 80 years old, where these adverse effects are poorly tolerated, radiotherapy is often given alone [4, 5], resulting in compromised tumour control. There is therefore an urgent need to develop new approaches to improving radiotherapy outcomes, both in terms of increasing tumour control and alleviating toxicity.
Research into the gut microbiota (defined as the bacteria residing in the gastrointestinal tract) has increased significantly over the past 15 years, with the gut microbiota being of greater importance in health and disease than previously recognised [6, 7]. It can positively influence immune responses involved in the enhancement of anticancer treatment efficacy and in protection against inflammatory processes, including radiotherapy side effects. Differences in gut microbiota composition and diversity have been found in responders and non-responders to chemoradiation  and in patients experiencing different levels of toxicities following radiotherapy .
The gut microbiota can feed on dietary fibres which reach the large intestine having avoided digestion earlier in the gastrointestinal tract. Fermentation of the fibre by the bacteria results in the production of metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFA; including acetate, propionate and butyrate) which are then absorbed by the colonocytes (Fig. 1). A high-fibre diet increases the abundance of specific bacteria that are capable of fermenting these non-digestible carbohydrates, thus increasing SCFA production . Other metabolites have been shown to mitigate radiation-induced intestinal damage, including tryptophan metabolites , urolithin A  and valeric acid .
The gut microbiota interacts with radiotherapy in two ways, impacting treatment response (RT efficacy against tumours [14,15,16] and normal tissue toxicities ) and itself being changed in composition by radiotherapy . Furthermore, altered dietary fibre intake can reduce radiotherapy side effects, leading to a better quality of life for patients [3, 19]. However, while dietary fibre can increase tumour responses to immunotherapy  and chemotherapy , data on radiotherapy are limited .
This review explores the impact of dietary fibre manipulation and the gut microbiota in the treatment of pelvic cancers with radiotherapy and their potential as novel adjuvant therapies to improve patient outcomes.
Each year, ~12,000 people in the UK receive radiotherapy for their pelvic malignancy . Radiotherapy treatment involves the delivery of beams of ionising radiation to a patient which react with body matter and damage DNA, either directly by breaking down molecules or indirectly by interacting with water in radiolysis to produce free radicals, which if unrepaired can lead to cell death. More recently, the concept of immunogenic cell death (ICD) has emerged, where cell death and alteration of the tumour microenvironment induce an adaptive immune response. This occurs by the release of molecules, collectively termed as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMP), which stimulate immune cell recruitment. Radiotherapy can initiate this process .
The overall aim of radiotherapy is to achieve tumour control (cure) while minimising the acute and late side effects on surrounding normal tissues. Tumour cure requires loss of proliferation in the entire tumour cell population (i.e., sterilisation). The therapeutic ratio aims to balance this tumour cell kill with minimal toxicity to surrounding normal tissue . Tissue responses vary depending on cell turnover rates; both epithelial and hematopoietic tissues have rapid turnover rates, predisposing them to develop acute effects . While combining radiotherapy with chemotherapy may improve tumour control, this may increase side effects.
Modern treatments, for example, 3D-CRT (three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy) and IMRT (intensity modulated therapy), use imaging modalities to precisely outline tumours to reduce the volume of normal tissue in the irradiation field and hence toxicity [26, 27]. IMRT allows the increased dose to the tumour with lower dose deposition in the surrounding tissues compared to 3D-CRT [19, 26]. However, this lower dose “bath” outside of the tumour region may predispose to the development of a second malignancy in these tissues , and can increase the volume of intestine irradiated, albeit to a lower dose.
Pelvic radiation disease
Functional damage resulting from radiation to the abdominopelvic region is now termed “Pelvic Radiation Disease” (PRD)  and affects 6000 patients annually in the UK . However, many symptoms (see later) go unreported as the patient assumes them to be typical following treatment.
Radiation enteritis (RE) is characterised by damage to the intestinal mucosa, and the diagnosis is based on the occurrence of PRD symptoms. These symptoms can be described as acute in 90% of patients, occurring during the therapy and up to three months afterwards, or chronic, either as a continuation of acute symptoms or their appearance de novo after three months; up to 90% of patients report a permanent change in their bowel habits and 50% develop symptoms which affect their quality of life. Furthermore, 2–10% develop severe radiation-induced bowel injuries, with 31% requiring surgical intervention . Acute symptoms include diarrhoea, nausea, abdominal pain, fatigue , anxiety and depression . In most patients, acute symptoms resolve as intestinal stem cell regeneration recovers the epithelium. In contrast, chronic symptoms are more severe, presenting as fistulae, perforation, abscesses, fibrosis  and malabsorption . The risk of developing chronic effects is greater in patients suffering from acute effects , although chronic effects can occur alone and, in rare cases, result in intestinal failure .
Cellular effects of radiation in the intestine
Radiation to the abdominopelvic area induces multiple cellular processes, including early disruption of the cell cycle in epithelial intestinal stem cells. These are prone to damage due to their rapid turnover rates, with the small intestine and colon having rates of 1.5 and 4.5 days, respectively . In addition, radiation dramatically impacts the epithelial membrane by compromising the tight junctions. This results in increased permeability, allowing bacteria to invade the surface, thus generating an acute inflammatory immune response [27, 31].
In the later phase, monocytes secrete vasoactive and fibrotic molecules. Myofibroblasts differentiate from fibroblasts, a process modulated by TGF-β1 (profibrogenic cytokine) . A specific increase in the expression of TGF-ß1, collagen, matrix metalloproteinases, macrophages and neutrophils, all of which promote fibrosis, has been found in chronic lesions . The vascular epithelium becomes prothrombotic due to increased expression of cell adhesion proteins and recruitment of leucocytes; if severe, this results in occlusion and ischaemia. Damage involving the enteric nervous system can result in decreased gut motility, encouraging a build-up of Gram-negative bacteria on the villi , leading to more inflammation.
The gut microbiota in health and cancer
The gut microbiota is rapidly colonised from birth, influenced by several factors, including host genotype, lifestyle, diet, environment and the immune system . Changes in dietary habits, use of antibiotics, illness  and anticancer treatment  can cause chaotic microbiota shifts. The gut microbiota has a huge beneficial impact on human physiological functions, including maintaining mucous membrane integrity, developing normal immune function and conferring protection against enteropathogenic bacteria . However, several species of oral and gut microbiota are associated with cancer development, including gastric cancer (Helicobacter pylori) , colorectal cancer (Fusobacterium nucleatum)  and pancreatic cancer (Porphyromonas gingivalis) . Reduced abundance of Clostridium cluster XI and Prevotella, decreased faecal butyrate levels and impaired intestinal integrity was found in newly diagnosed bladder cancer patients . Parvimonas was enriched in colorectal cancer  and increased with respect to ageing  implying that ageing-associated gut microbiota changes could impact cancer development.
The effects of ageing on the gut microbiota
Pelvic malignancy is prevalent in the elderly population . As age increases, the gut microbiota shifts to a lower diversity , with decreased SCFA-producing bacterial abundance  and a bacterial composition less likely to respond to anticancer treatments . Three gut microbes, namely, Akkermansia muciniphila , Bifidobacterium  and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii , associated with a better immunotherapy efficacy via immunomodulation and protection against radiation-caused injury, are depleted in older adults [50, 51]. Furthermore, Bifidobacterium is depleted in the elderly population , and dietary supplementation of probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis can successfully restore cellular immune function . Therefore, the gut microbiota could be a therapeutic target to promote tumour responses to radiotherapy in the elderly.
Immunomodulatory effects of the gut microbiota
The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in multiple immunological processes, including:
Maturation and modulation of the immune response via innate immune elements, such as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) expressed on cells in the intestinal mucosa (e.g., enterocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages), and adaptive immune elements formed by B cells and T cells .
Maturation and formation of Peyer’s patches (PP). PP form a part of gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). Specialised microfold cells (M cells) located on their surface sample the antigen and deliver it to antigen-presenting cells within the patches. PP are also sites for B-cell maturation, making them vital for immune surveillance and response.
Influencing B-cell activation, either directly via antigen binding to B-cell receptors or indirectly by activation of T cells and innate lymphoid cells, making them essential for maintaining appropriate IgA levels.
Inducing increased natural killer (NK) cell activity and secretion of IFN-γ, IL-2 and IL-12 which impacts the activation and phenotype of macrophages, creating an anti-tumour environment. In addition, commensal bacteria can, directly or via DCs, stimulate and prime effector T cells for tumour toxicity.
The gut microbiota in radiotherapy and pelvic cancers
The interaction of the gut microbiota and cancer treatments is bidirectional, in that these treatments can disrupt the composition of the gut microbiota, and those disruptions can impact on the treatment response and the development of toxicities . The potential mechanisms underlying the bidirectional effects of the gut microbiota and radiotherapy have been extensively reviewed by Liu et al. .
Changes in the gut microbiota pre- and post-IR and its correlation with toxicities
Ionising radiation (IR) significantly alters the gut microbiota profile. The most consistent finding across studies was a significant reduction in richness and α-diversity (within sample diversity, commonly measured by Shannon’s or Simpson’s indices) of the gut microbiota following pelvic radiotherapy [17, 35, 57,58,59]. A significantly lower α-diversity pre-radiotherapy correlated with the development of toxicities, as seen in patients who developed post-radiation diarrhoea . A relatively lower α-diversity post-radiotherapy was also seen in patients with RE  and post-radiation diarrhoea [9, 60]. Patients harbouring a higher α-diversity at baseline had more favourable outcomes, e.g., no self-reported symptoms following radiotherapy . Specific changes in bacterial composition were also reported, although the findings remain inconsistent. Overall, the consensus observation is an increase in phyla Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria and unclassified bacteria and a decrease in phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes and genera Faecalibacterium and Bifidobacterium following pelvic radiotherapy [61, 62].
Characteristic pre-radiotherapy microbial compositions were seen in patients who later developed RE during pelvic irradiation  or post-radiation diarrhoea  and in patients demonstrating improved survival . An increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria and decreased relative abundance of Clostridiales and Bacteroides have been reported in patients with non-favourable GI outcomes, such as RE, diarrhoea and colonic fibrosis (Table 1). Proteobacteria are Gram-negative, and the overgrowth of Gram-negative bacteria was vital to the pathogenesis of RE . In contrast, Clostridiales and Bacteroides are SCFA-producing bacteria known to promote intestinal homoeostasis; therefore, their depletion might have detrimental effects (see later). These findings suggest that an increase in deleterious bacteria and a decrease in favourable bacteria may contribute to the development of toxicities, hence recolonising the gut microbiota with favourable species and increasing the diversity pre- and post-radiotherapy may alleviate radiation-induced toxicities.
The underlying mechanisms of the gut microbiota on IR-caused intestinal injury remain to be elucidated. Germ-free (GF) mice, devoid of the gut microbiota, are remarkably resistant to lethal RE. Histological analysis following 16 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) revealed that GF mice had no evidence of RE, whereas control mice harbouring a gut microbiota displayed an injury response . The colonisation of GF mice with irradiated microbiota and subsequent radiation exposure resulted in more severe tissue damage than in GF mice with naive microbiota , and the irradiated microbiota induced pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-1β, in vitro and in vivo. Antagonising the IL-1 receptor ameliorated tissue damage, implying that IL-1 was a significant driver in its pathogenesis. Therefore, IR-induced alterations to the gut microbiota could themselves contribute to intestinal inflammation and hence exacerbate RE.
As current evidence is mostly limited to association studies between the gut microbiota and normal tissue toxicities, studies involving manipulation of the gut microbiota before and during RT are required.
Effects of gut microbiota composition on tumour outcome
There has been recent interest in exploiting the effect of the baseline gut microbiota profile on tumour response following immunotherapy [66,67,68], chemotherapy [69,70,71,72], chemoradiation  and radiotherapy [14,15,16], in both preclinical models and human studies. Patients harbouring a higher α-diversity at baseline had more favourable outcomes, as seen in patients with improved tumour responses to chemoradiation, thus leading to improved patient survival . Rectal cancer responders to concurrent chemoradiation had a higher pre-RT abundance of Bacteroidales (Bacteroidaceae, Rikenellaceae, Bacteroides) compared to non-responders .
Unfortunately, with high interindividual variability, heterogeneity among studies in humans and mice, and inconsistent findings reported, a specific favourable microbiota profile associated with the development of radiation-induced toxicities (Table 1) and/or tumour response (Table 2) has not been defined. If such profiles were to be established, modulating the gut microbiota by means of probiotics, prebiotics or faecal microbiota transplant could reduce toxicity and improve tumour responses in pelvic radiotherapy patients. Since most studies utilised 16 S rRNA gene sequencing for microbial analysis, which only identifies bacteria at higher taxonomic levels, the need for strain-level metagenomic analysis is therefore important for application in clinical practice.
The role of SCFAs in health and cancer
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are fermented from dietary fibres by the gut microbiota. The three most common SCFAs, namely, acetate (C2), propionate (C3), and butyrate (C4), are produced primarily by two phyla of bacteria; Firmicutes, which produce butyrate, and Bacteroidetes, which produce acetate and propionate . They account for approximately 90 to 95 percent of all SCFAs produced, in a constant molar ratio of 3:1:1, and the minor SCFAs are isobutyric, valeric (C5), isovaleric and caproate acid (C6). Colonocytes absorb SCFAs following their production in the gut; most of the butyrate absorbed and metabolised as fuel. Propionate travels along the portal circulation to the liver, where it is taken up by hepatocytes for energy. Acetate cannot be oxidised in the liver, and so enters the systemic circulation, with the remaining unabsorbed SCFAs, to travel to other target tissues . Butyrate maintains intestinal barrier integrity by increasing the expression of claudin, a tight junction protein , and stabilises hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), thereby increasing the expression of its barrier-protective target genes .
Mechanisms of action of SCFAs
The effects of SCFAs are mediated via two major mechanisms, extracellular binding to their corresponding G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), GPR41, GPR43, GPR109A (butyrate only), leading to a plethora of downstream signalling pathways, and acting intracellularly as class I and IIa HDAC inhibitors (Fig. 2). The GPR43 is expressed along the whole gastrointestinal tract, and propionate and acetate are the most potent and selective activators.
Butyrate was one of the first discovered histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors , and has the strongest HDAC inhibitory activity of the SCFAs . By allowing hyperacetylation of their corresponding histone proteins, the SCFAs increase the accessibility of transcription factors to the promoter regions of target genes, thereby modulating gene expression epigenetically . SCFA receptors are expressed in the intestine, immune cells, adipose tissue, neurons, skeletal muscles and the heart. This widespread expression partly explains their involvement in various diseases . Here, we will focus on their role in normal gut tissue and as anticancer treatment in terms of immune and non-immune effects (Fig. 2).
Effects of SCFAs on gut toxicity
The abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria from the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes is decreased in the gut microbiota of patients following radiotherapy and in those suffering from post-radiation inflammatory conditions [62, 81]. Topical sodium butyrate was shown to be effective in treating acute radiation proctitis in patients with pelvic malignancy after receiving radiotherapy . Hence SCFAs may have a role in the alleviation or prevention of radiotherapy-induced toxicities, although the underlying mechanisms need to be determined.
Effects of SCFAs on gut immunity
SCFAs mediate communication between the gut microbiota and the mucosal immune system. For example, butyrate can inactivate nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB)  and downregulate the production of tumour necrosis factor (TNF), decreasing inflammation, and it can decrease oxidative stress in the colon, improve gut barrier function, and protect against colon cancer and ulcerative colitis (an inflammatory bowel disease) [84, 85]. In vitro incubation of SCFAs with healthy human colon cells showed decrease in NF-κB activity, which has also correlated with improvement of colitis in mice in vivo .
SCFAs also impact the maturation of DCs which in turn stimulate regulatory T cells (Tregs). The microbiota has also an ongoing crosstalk with Tregs, inducing secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines . Furusawa et al. reported a positive correlation between SCFA concentrations and colonic Tregs in mice fed a high-fibre diet (HFD), and found in vitro that butyrate, at physiological concentrations, significantly induced naive CD4+ T cells into Foxp3+ IL-10-producing Treg cells via HDACi activity. These results translated in vivo with a butyrate-containing diet ameliorating colitis induced by adoptive transfer of CD4+ CD45RBhi naive T cell into Rag−/− mice, with a higher colonic Foxp3+ Treg population compared to the control group . Peripheral Treg induction and proliferation as well as de novo generation, at sites other than colon, have also been demonstrated by feeding propionate- and butyrate-containing water to mice treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics .
The current literature is inconsistent regarding SCFAs’ immune effects. Some studies have shown that higher levels of SCFAs stimulate pro-inflammatory cytokine-producing T cells in contrast to their generally agreed anti-inflammatory role [88, 89]. This agrees with studies which found an increased abundance of SCFAs in patients with post-radiation RE and diarrhoea .
Effects of other metabolites on gut toxicities and immunity
The gut microbiota, Lachnospiraceae and Enterococcaceae and SCFAs, especially propionate, have been shown to mitigate radiation-induced intestinal damage and the radioprotection was also associated with two tryptophan pathway metabolites, namely, 1H-indole-3-carboxaldehyde(I3A) and kynurenic acid (KYNA) . Xiao et al. also demonstrated that gut microbiota-derived indole 3-propionic acid reduced gastrointestinal injury after radiation exposure. It attenuated local and systemic inflammatory levels, such as IL-6 and TNFɑ in the small intestine and peripheral blood, and mitigated radiation-induced colonic shortening . In addition, valeric acid improved intestinal epithelial integrity and the recovery of gut microbiota after total abdominal irradiation . Urolithin A, produced from the transformation of ellagitannins by gut microbiota, decreased the radiation-induced enterocyte apoptosis in the small intestine and restored gut microbiota changes after total body irradiation .
Effects of SCFAs on cancer cells
An interesting inconsistency for SCFAs in the literature is the “butyrate paradox”, in which butyrate stimulates cell proliferation of healthy colonocytes in vitro and in vivo but demonstrates opposing anticancer effects in cancer cell lines . Donohoe et al. were the first to explain the paradox via the Warburg effect. In normal colonocytes, butyrate is rapidly metabolised via β-oxidation for fuel, and little remains in the cytoplasm. However, in cancerous cells, as a survival adaptation, glucose is preferentially used as fuel over SCFA, so the spared cytoplasmic butyrate can travel into the nucleus where it acts as an HDACi, upregulating the expression of genes involved in anti-tumour activities . This property of butyrate makes it an attractive candidate as a potential tumour radiosensitiser which will be further discussed.
All three major SCFAs have demonstrated anticancer effects, but butyrate’s role has been studied most extensively due to its more potent activity as an HDACi compared to propionate and acetate . For example, propionate induced apoptosis in lung cancer cells , and butyrate and propionate suppressed the proliferation of breast cancer cells . Acetate, propionate, and butyrate increased histone deacetylase inhibition and radiosensitivity in human bladder cancer cells .
Despite these benefits of SCFAs, physiological concentrations of SCFAs in human plasma are low. In a study where healthy subjects were put on an HFD, taking 35 g of dietary fibre per day for 5 days, despite significantly increased SCFA concentrations in the HFD group, there were no changes to concentrations of anti-inflammatory cytokines and the number of circulating Tregs .
Effects of SCFAs on the tumour microenvironment
SCFAs can boost cellular metabolism and memory potential in CD8+ T cells , which may mean that SCFAs can promote a favourable tumour microenvironment in bladder cancer, in which T-cell inflamed tumours  with increased FOXP3+ Treg infiltration  have been associated with improved patient survival. Their anti-inflammatory properties also point them to a potential treatment for IR-induced RE.
Modulating the gut microbiota to improve radiotherapy outcomes in pelvic cancers
The gut microbiota can be modulated by administering live microorganism (probiotics) or altering the fibre that they feed upon (prebiotics—see later) and such approaches are cheap and relatively safe. As diet has a major impact on gut health in terms of microbiota composition, diversity, and richness, dietary fibre manipulation could be a promising approach to target the gut microbiota effectively in a short period of time  to enhance RT efficacy or mitigating side effects. We hypothesise that high fibre positively influences tumour responses via fermentation of the high fibre and/or immunomodulation and reinforces the pre-RT gut microbiota to be more resistant to changes caused by IR. An alternative hypothesis is that it restores the gut microbiota during radiotherapy, thereby reducing the effects of the unfavourable IR-altered microbiota. Important questions need to be answered to determine the timing of dietary fibre supplements in RT patients to maximise the therapeutic ratio.
Tumour radiosensitisation and modulation of the gut microbiota
Radiotherapy results in normal tissue toxicity and tumour cell death. IR kills cells by inducing lethal double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the genome. The cell detects this damage and initiates DNA repair mechanisms, both error-prone non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and accurate homologous recombination (HR), which rescue the cell from apoptosis. Molecules that can interfere with DNA repair or signalling processes can therefore act as radiosensitisers, increasing the number of DSBs lesions following IR and promoting apoptosis .
Butyrate acts on key players in DNA repair, namely, the DNA protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), Ku70/Ku80 and ligase IV/XRCC4/XLF (Lig IV complex) . A study utilising three-dimensional cultured organoids developed from intestinal stem cells from colorectal cancer (CRC) patients to mimic the native intestinal structure and environment, found that butyrate was the only SCFA to suppress the proliferation of cancerous organoids, and only radiosensitised tumour cell-derived organoids while sparing normal tissue organoids via the Warburg effect . Furthermore, HDACi have been shown to radiosensitise tumours in vivo while sparing normal intestine from acute (panobinostat ) and late effects (romidepsin ). Therefore, it is rational to postulate that radiosensitisation might be achieved by increasing the population of SCFA-producing bacteria within the gut microbiota.
A study demonstrated that feeding a high soluble fibre (HSF) diet with 10% inulin to mice transplanted with human bladder cancer cells slowed tumour growth after irradiation compared to mice fed diets with lower fibre content. In the HSF group, an increased abundance of Bacteroides acidifaciens was found, which positively correlated with survival . B. acidifaciens produces acetate, but faecal butyrate levels were found to be increased. Since acetate is needed for butyrate synthesis via the butyryl-CoA:acetate CoA transferase pathway , the putative explanation for this phenomenon is cross-feeding, where B. acidifaciens produces acetate to cross-feed other, butyrate-producing, bacteria in the gut microbiota . The radiosensitising effect observed may possibly be attributed to increased SCFA production in the HSF diet-fed mice due to enriched B. acidifaciens. This finding opens an exciting avenue in which promising radiosensitisers like butyrate can be enriched in patients via the low-cost, non-toxic approach of dietary intervention. Such research is in its infancy; more robust in vivo data are required, followed by clinical trials, before such an approach can enter routine clinical practice.
There are relatively limited in vivo studies of gut microbiota and the efficacy of radiotherapy. Three studies all used an antibiotics-based approach to deplete specific groups of gut microbiota to change the RT efficacy and two studied cancers outside the gastrointestinal tract. Vancomycin, an antibiotic that kills Gram-positive bacteria in the gut, successfully enhanced radiotherapy efficacy via increasing dendritic cell antigen presentation [14, 15]. In contrast, an antibiotic cocktail of ampicillin, imipenem, cilastatin, and vancomycin reduced efficacy of radiotherapy with depletion of the commensal bacteria .
Amelioration of radiation-induced toxicity
Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer health benefits to their host by altering the metabolic and nutritional function of the commensal microbiota . They resist injury caused by gastric acid and bile to reach the large intestine intact. They can be obtained either from supplements or from specific foods prepared by bacterial fermentation. Probiotics, usually complex combinations of microorganisms, most commonly involve the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium bacterial genera, and have a specific mechanism of action .
Probiotics can modulate intestinal immune functions - decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines, increasing secretory IgA and promoting tolerogenic cytokine profiles and regulatory pathways. They help reduce inflammation within the gut by optimising the epithelial barrier function, promoting cytoprotective responses and increasing mucin secretion. Moreover, probiotics limit possible harm by pathogenic bacteria: they decrease pathogen binding sites, reduce luminal pH and aid the production of anti-bacterial bacteriocins. However, little is currently known about the effects of probiotics on RT tumour responses.
The benefits of probiotics in reducing radiation-induced adverse effects of cervical cancer therapies within the gastrointestinal tract have been extensively studied. L. acidophilus LA-5 plus B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 were associated with significantly reduced use of loperamide, an antidiarrheal medication, among the probiotic patients, with a reduced incidence of grade 2 abdominal pain and episodes of abdominal pain in days after receiving radiotherapy . In patients treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy taking a mixture of probiotics and prebiotics over a 7-week period, faecal calprotectin was reduced as well as their frequency and intensity of vomiting . Supplementation with the probiotic mixture VSL resulted in reduced daily bowel movements and a reduced incidence of radiation-induced diarrhoea .
In patients with gynaecological malignancies undergoing radiotherapy, fermented milk containing live L. acidophilus bacteria (and 6.5% lactulose as the probiotic substrate) reduced radiation-induced diarrhoea . Moreover, patients supplemented with L. rhamnosus (Antibiophilus) had less radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity, with improved faecal consistency and fewer bowel movements .
A prebiotic is “a non-digestible compound that, through its metabolism by microorganisms in the gut, modulates composition and activity of the gut microbiota, thus conferring a beneficial physiological effect on the host” . Most prebiotics are classified as dietary fibres and are defined as substances fermented by intestinal microbiota that encourage specific intestinal bacteria growth and action. They must be resistant to gastric acid, hydrolysis by gastrointestinal enzymes and absorption across the epithelium so that they reach the large intestine intact. The gut microbiota and host exhibit a symbiotic relationship where gastrointestinal bacteria metabolise dietary polysaccharides, indigestible by human enzymes. This relationship makes the microbiota subject to modulation based on dietary intake (of specific prebiotics and fibre) since their growth and action is dependent on substrate availability .
Some recommendations advise a low-fibre diet while undergoing pelvic radiotherapy, but, in contrast, one randomised controlled trial (RCT) showed that a high-fibre diet may decrease GI toxicity and associated symptoms . In patients with endometrial, cervical, colon, rectal or prostate cancer, prebiotics, partially hydrolysed guar gum (PHGG; natural water-soluble fibre source) reduced the frequency of diarrhoea following pelvic radiation treatment .
A murine study researching the effects of oat bran in reducing intestinal inflammation after pelvic irradiation reported similar findings and further suggested that a low-fibre diet may be harmful to patients . A human RCT compared the effect of Metamucil (psyllium husk, a dietary fibre) in preventing diarrhoea related to pelvic radiotherapy . Metamucil resulted in lowered severity of diarrhoea than placebo. An RCT studying the effect of fibre (inulin/fructooligosaccharides) compared to placebo in preventing RE in gynaecological cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy found that taking inulin generally improved stool consistency . They had previously found that abdominal radiotherapy reduced Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium counts but supplementation with an inulin and fructooligosaccharides mixture improved the recovery of both genera post-therapy . However, there was no significant improvement in symptoms. One preparatory study recently reported plans for a large RCT investigating dietary fibre intake during pelvic radiotherapy , and, as available evidence continues to amass, this approach may soon impact clinical practice.
Faecal microbiota transplant
Faecal microbiota transplant (FMT), a procedure where donor faeces are mixed with saline solution before being transplanted into a patient (often through colonoscopy) to change their gut microbiota, has been used to treat various gastrointestinal conditions, including Clostridiodes difficile infection, showing to be effective [125,126,127]. NICE guidelines now support FMT as treatment for recurrent C. diff infections. It has also been investigated as a treatment for refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated colitis (an immunotherapy side effect) , with one patient having a significantly increased prevalence of Blautia and Bifidobacterium species after FMT, which has been linked to decreased levels of intestinal inflammation . Therefore, FMT may potentially be useful as a treatment for gastrointestinal toxicity caused by pelvic radiotherapy.
In a murine study, FMT post-radiation increased the survival rate of young mice . However, when the experiment was replicated using older mice, their survival was not increased by FMT. Therefore, FMT may not solve the problem of post-radiation gastrointestinal toxicity in the elderly population. Evidence indicates the elderly population have an altered microbiota composition including reduced diversity, more Proteobacteria/other potentially pathological organisms, and fewer SCFA-producing species [131, 132].
A five-patient pilot study investigating FMT as a treatment for chronic RE caused by pelvic radiotherapy found that three patients responded to FMT, including a reduction in symptoms and physical improvement in mucosal injury on endoscopy . Notably, symptoms recurred, possibly indicating a need for multiple FMT’s long-term. Likewise, a case report on chronic haemorrhagic radiation proctitis found that FMT relieved associated symptoms . Despite these promising results, larger research studies are needed to test their applicability in the wider population.
Conclusions and future perspectives
Research is now emerging into the influence of the gut microbiota on pelvic cancers, and the possibility of exploiting this in radiotherapy-based treatments, to improve both tumour control and side effects, is an exciting prospect. However, further studies are required to clarify the in-depth mechanisms, to provide evidence of the causal effects of the gut microbiota, the metabolome and immunity, and to explore the other potential dietary fibres or combinations to maximise the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy.
Evidence is currently lacking regarding the involvement of the gut microbiota in late radiation-induced bowel toxicity; if modulation were possible, this could make a real impact on improving patient outcomes long-term.
Modulating the gut microbiota by dietary fibre manipulation may be particularly useful in the elderly, who cannot tolerate current chemoradiation schedules and whose microbiota composition is less favourable than that found in young patients. They therefore may have a gut microbiota with the most to gain in terms of increasing bacterial diversity, elimination of potentially pathogenic organisms and increasing SCFA-producing species. As evidence for dietary fibre manipulation is still relatively limited, more clinical studies with robust data are required before these strategies can be applied clinically.
In addition, the “baseline” that exists in the RT population varies hugely as intake of dietary fibre, microbiota profiles, production of SCFA and gut motility are highly individual and heterogenous. Further work should include clinical studies to better understand the baseline from which we are operating and the potential for improvement. Such work might help to identify those patients who would benefit most from these novel interventions.
UK, CR. Bowel Cancer Incidence Statistics, 2018. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/bowel-cancer#heading-Zero. Accessed 25 January 2022.
Pilleron S, Alqurini N, Ferlay J, Haase KR, Hannan M, Janssen-Heijnen M, et al. International trends in cancer incidence in middle-aged and older adults in 44 countries. J Geriatr Oncol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2021.11.011.
Bartsch B, Then CK, Harriss E, Kartsonaki C, Kiltie AE. The role of dietary supplements, including biotics, glutamine, polyunsaturated fatty acids and polyphenols, in reducing gastrointestinal side effects in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021;29:11–19.
Fuccio L, Frazzoni L, Guido A. Prevention of pelvic radiation disease. World J Gastrointest Pharm Ther. 2015;6:1–9.
Repetto L. Greater risks of chemotherapy toxicity in elderly patients with cancer. J Support Oncol. 2003;1:18–24.
Kumagai T, Rahman F, Smith AM. The microbiome and radiation induced-bowel injury: evidence for potential mechanistic role in disease pathogenesis. Nutrients. 2018;10:1405.
Spencer CN, McQuade JL, Gopalakrishnan V, McCulloch JA, Vetizou M, Cogdill AP, et al. Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response. Science. 2021;374:1632.
Sims TT, El Alam MB, Karpinets TV, Dorta-Estremera S, Hegde VL, Nookala S, et al. Gut microbiome diversity is an independent predictor of survival in cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiation. Commun Biol. 2021;4:1–10.
Reis Ferreira M, Andreyev HJN, Mohammed K, Truelove L, Gowan SM, Li J, et al. Microbiota- and radiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal side-effects (MARS) study: a large pilot study of the microbiome in acute and late-radiation enteropathy. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:6487–6500.
Tsvetikova SA, Koshel EI. Microbiota and cancer: host cellular mechanisms activated by gut microbial metabolites. Int J Med Microbiol. 2020;310:151425.
Guo H, Chou WC, Lai Y, Liang K, Tam JW, Brickey WJ, et al. Multi-omics analyses of radiation survivors identify radioprotective microbes and metabolites. Science. 2020;370:eaay9097.
Zhang Y, Dong Y, Lu P, Wang X, Li W, Dong H, et al. Gut metabolite Urolithin A mitigates ionizing radiation-induced intestinal damage. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25:10306–12.
Li Y, Dong J, Xiao H, Zhang S, Wang B, Cui M, et al. Gut commensal derived-valeric acid protects against radiation injuries. Gut Microbes. 2020;11:789–806.
Uribe-Herranz M, Rafail S, Beghi S, Gil-de-Gomez L, Verginadis I, Bittinger K, et al. Gut microbiota modulate dendritic cell antigen presentation and radiotherapy-induced antitumor immune response. J Clin Investig. 2020;130:466–79.
Yang K, Hou Y, Zhang Y, Liang H, Sharma A, Zheng W, et al. Suppression of local type I interferon by gut microbiota-derived butyrate impairs antitumor effects of ionizing radiation. J Exp Med. 2021;218:e20201915.
Shiao SL, Kershaw KM, Limon JJ, You S, Yoon J, Ko EY, et al. Commensal bacteria and fungi differentially regulate tumor responses to radiation therapy. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:1202–13.e1206.
Wang AP, Ling ZX, Yang ZX, Kiela PR, Wang T, Wang C, et al. Gut microbial dysbiosis may predict diarrhea and fatigue in patients undergoing pelvic cancer radiotherapy: a pilot study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126312.
Wu J, Wang S, Zheng B, Qiu X, Wang H, Chen L. Modulation of gut microbiota to enhance effect of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2021;12:669150.
Dohm A, Sanchez J, Stotsky-Himelfarb E, Willingham FF, Hoffe S. Strategies to minimize late effects from pelvic radiotherapy. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021;41:158–68.
Li Y, Elmen L, Segota I, Xian Y, Tinoco R, Feng Y, et al. Prebiotic-induced anti-tumor immunity attenuates tumor growth. Cell Rep. 2020;30:1753–66.e1756.
Then CK, Paillas S, Wang XD, Hampson A, Kiltie AE. Association of Bacteroides acidifaciens relative abundance with high-fibre diet-associated radiosensitisation. BMC Biol. 2021;19:1–16.
Andreyev J. Gastrointestinal complications of pelvic radiotherapy: are they of any importance? Gut. 2005;54:1051–4.
Yamazaki T, Vanpouille-Box C, Demaria S, Galluzzi L. Immunogenic cell death driven by radiation-impact on the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Treat Res. 2020;180:281–96.
Barrett A, Morris S, Dobbs J, Roques T, editors. Chapter 3: Radiobiology and treatment planning. Practical radiotherapy planning. 4th ed. London: CRC Press; 2009. p. 32–43.
Barrett A, Morris S, Dobbs J, Roques T, editors. Chapter 4: Organs at risk and tolerance of normal tissues. Practical radiotherapy planning. 4th ed. London: CRC Press; 2009. p. 44–53.
Lawrie TA, Green JT, Beresford M, Wedlake L, Burden S, Davidson SE, et al. Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic cancers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;1:CD012529.
Moussa L, Usunier B, Demarquay C, Benderitter M, Tamarat R, Sémont A, et al. Bowel radiation injury: complexity of the pathophysiology and promises of cell and tissue engineering. Cell Transpl. 2016;25:1723–46.
Morris KA, Haboubi NY. Pelvic radiation therapy: between delight and disaster. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;7:279–88.
Hauer-Jensen M, Denham JW, Andreyev HJ. Radiation enteropathy-pathogenesis, treatment and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:470–9.
Dilalla V, Chaput G, Williams T, Sultanem K. Radiotherapy side effects: integrating a survivorship clinical lens to better serve patients. Curr Oncol. 2020;27:107–12.
Goudarzi M, Mak TD, Jacobs JP, Moon BH, Strawn SJ, Braun J, et al. An integrated multi-omic approach to assess radiation injury on the host-microbiome axis. Radiat Res. 2016;186:219–34.
Ferreira MR, Muls A, Dearnaley DP, Andreyev HJ. Microbiota and radiation-induced bowel toxicity: lessons from inflammatory bowel disease for the radiation oncologist. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e139–147.
Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007;449:804–10.
Thursby E, Juge N. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem J. 2017;474:1823–36.
Mitra A, Biegert GWG, Delgado AY, Karpinets TV, Solley TN, Mezzari MP, et al. Microbial diversity and composition is associated with patient-reported toxicity during chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2020;107:163–71.
Okumura R, Takeda K. Maintenance of intestinal homeostasis by mucosal barriers. Inflamm Regen. 2018;38:5.
Parsonnet J, Friedman GD, Vandersteen DP, Chang Y, Vogelman JH, Orentreich N, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of gastric carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1127–31.
Castellarin M, Warren RL, Freeman JD, Dreolini L, Krzywinski M, Strauss J, et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum infection is prevalent in human colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res. 2012;22:299–306.
Fan XZ, Alekseyenko AV, Wu J, Peters BA, Jacobs EJ, Gapstur SM, et al. Human oral microbiome and prospective risk for pancreatic cancer: a population-based nested case-control study. Gut. 2018;67:120–7.
He C, Li B, Huang L, Teng C, Bao Y, Ren M, et al. Gut microbial composition changes in bladder cancer patients: a case-control study in Harbin, China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2020;29:395–403.
Nakatsu G, Li X, Zhou H, Sheng J, Wong SH, Wu WK, et al. Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8727.
Xu CM, Zhu HQ, Qiu P. Aging progression of human gut microbiota. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19:1–10.
Erlich A, Zlotta AR. Treatment of bladder cancer in the elderly. Investig Clin Urol. 2016;57:S26–35.
O’Toole PW, Jeffery IB. Gut microbiota and aging. Science. 2015;350:1214–5.
Biragyn A, Ferrucci L. Gut dysbiosis: a potential link between increased cancer risk in ageing and inflammaging. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:E295–E304.
Spakowicz D, Bibi A, Muniak M, Williams NF, Hoyd R, Presley CJ. The aging microbiome and response to immunotherapy: considerations for the treatment of older adults with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2021;12:985–9.
Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, Duong CPM, Alou MT, Daillere R, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science. 2018;359:91.
Sivan A, Corrales L, Hubert N, Williams JB, Aquino-Michaels K, Earley ZM, et al. Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy. Science. 2015;350:1084–9.
Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer CN, Nezi L, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Karpinets TV, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science. 2018;359:97–103.
Wu L, Zeng TS, Zinellu A, Rubino S, Kelvin DJ, Carru C. A cross-sectional study of compositional and functional profiles of gut microbiota in Sardinian centenarians. Msystems. 2019;4:e00325-19.
Collado MC, Derrien M, Isolauri E. Intestinal integrity and Akkermansia muciniphila, a mucin-degrading member of the intestinal microbiota present in infants, adults, and the elderly. Appl Environ Micro. 2007;73:7767–70.
Woodmansey EJ, McMurdo ME, Macfarlane GT, Macfarlane S. Comparison of compositions and metabolic activities of fecal microbiotas in young adults and in antibiotic-treated and non-antibiotic-treated elderly subjects. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:6113–22.
Gill HS, Rutherfurd KJ, Cross ML, Gopal PK. Enhancement of immunity in the elderly by dietary supplementation with the probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis HN019. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74:833–9.
Gopalakrishnan V, Helmink BA, Spencer CN, Reuben A, Wargo JA. The influence of the gut microbiome on cancer, immunity, and cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:570–80.
Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M, Palombaro M, Pulcini G, Gasbarrini A, et al. Nutritional interventions targeting gut microbiota during cancer therapies. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1469.
Liu J, Liu C, Yue J. Radiotherapy and the gut microbiome: facts and fiction. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16:9.
Nam YD, Kim HJ, Seo JG, Kang SW, Bae JW. Impact of pelvic radiotherapy on gut microbiota of gynecological cancer patients revealed by massive pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e82659.
Yi Y, Shen L, Shi W, Xia F, Zhang H, Wang Y, et al. Gut microbiome components predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:1329–40.
Wang ZQ, Wang QX, Wang X, Zhu L, Chen J, Zhang BL, et al. Gut microbial dysbiosis is associated with development and progression of radiation enteritis during pelvic radiotherapy. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:3747–56.
Manichanh C, Varela E, Martinez C, Antolin M, Llopis M, Dore J, et al. The gut microbiota predispose to the pathophysiology of acute postradiotherapy diarrhea. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1754–61.
Wang L, Wang X, Zhang G, Ma Y, Zhang Q, Li Z, et al. The impact of pelvic radiotherapy on the gut microbiome and its role in radiation-induced diarrhoea: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16:187.
Fernandes A, Oliveira A, Soares R, Barata P. The effects of ionizing radiation on gut microbiota, a systematic review. Nutrients. 2021;13:3025.
Husebye E, Skar V, Høverstad T, Iversen T, Melby K. Abnormal intestinal motor patterns explain enteric colonization with Gram-negative bacilli in late radiation enteropathy. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:1078–89.
Crawford PA, Gordon JI. Microbial regulation of intestinal radiosensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:13254–9.
Gerassy-Vainberg S, Blatt A, Danin-Poleg Y, Gershovich K, Sabo E, Nevelsky A, et al. Radiation induces proinflammatory dysbiosis: transmission of inflammatory susceptibility by host cytokine induction. Gut. 2018;67:97–107.
Jin Y, Dong H, Xia L, Yang Y, Zhu Y, Shen Y, et al. The diversity of gut microbiome is associated with favorable responses to anti-programmed death 1 immunotherapy in Chinese patients with NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:1378–89.
Tanoue T, Morita S, Plichta DR, Skelly AN, Suda W, Sugiura Y, et al. A defined commensal consortium elicits CD8 T cells and anti-cancer immunity. Nature. 2019;565:600–5.
Vetizou M, Pitt JM, Daillere R, Lepage P, Waldschmitt N, Flament C, et al. Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota. Science. 2015;350:1079–84.
Daillere R, Vetizou M, Waldschmitt N, Yamazaki T, Isnard C, Poirier-Colame V, et al. Enterococcus hirae and Barnesiella intestinihominis facilitate cyclophosphamide-induced therapeutic immunomodulatory effects. Immunity. 2016;45:931–43.
Geller LT, Barzily-Rokni M, Danino T, Jonas OH, Shental N, Nejman D, et al. Potential role of intratumor bacteria in mediating tumor resistance to the chemotherapeutic drug gemcitabine. Science. 2017;357:1156–60.
Iida N, Dzutsev A, Stewart CA, Smith L, Bouladoux N, Weingarten RA, et al. Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Science. 2013;342:967–70.
Viaud S, Saccheri F, Mignot G, Yamazaki T, Daillere R, Hannani D, et al. The intestinal microbiota modulates the anticancer immune effects of cyclophosphamide. Science. 2013;342:971–6.
Jang BS, Chang JH, Chie EK, Kim K, Park JW, Kim MJ, et al. Gut microbiome composition is associated with a pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2020;107:736–46.
Cummings JH, Pomare EW, Branch WJ, Naylor CP, Macfarlane GT. Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood. Gut. 1987;28:1221–7.
Feng W, Wu Y, Chen G, Fu S, Li B, Huang B, et al. Sodium butyrate attenuates diarrhea in weaned piglets and promotes tight junction protein expression in colon in a GPR109A-dependent manner. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;47:1617–29.
Kelly CJ, Zheng L, Campbell EL, Saeedi B, Scholz CC, Bayless AJ, et al. Crosstalk between microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids and intestinal epithelial HIF augments tissue barrier function. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:662–71.
Candido EPM, Reeves R, Davie JR. Sodium butyrate inhibits histone deacetylation in cultured cells. Cell. 1978;14:105–13.
Sunkara LT, Jiang W, Zhang G. Modulation of antimicrobial host defense peptide gene expression by free fatty acids. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e49558.
Martin-Gallausiaux C, Marinelli L, Blottière HM, Larraufie P, Lapaque N. SCFA: mechanisms and functional importance in the gut. Proc Nutr Soc. 2021;80:37–49.
Laudes M, Geisler C, Rohmann N, Bouwman J, Pischon T, Schlicht K. Microbiota in health and disease-potential clinical applications. Nutrients. 2021;13:3866.
Jian Y, Zhang D, Liu M, Wang Y, Xu ZX. The impact of gut microbiota on radiation-induced enteritis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:586392.
Vernia P, Fracasso PL, Casale V, Villotti G, Marcheggiano A, Stigliano V, et al. Topical butyrate for acute radiation proctitis: randomised, crossover trial. Lancet. 2000;356:1232–5.
Chen G, Ran X, Li B, Li Y, He D, Huang B, et al. Sodium butyrate inhibits inflammation and maintains epithelium barrier integrity in a TNBS-induced inflammatory bowel disease mice model. EBioMedicine. 2018;30:317–25.
Bourassa MW, Alim I, Bultman SJ, Ratan RR. Butyrate, neuroepigenetics and the gut microbiome: can a high fiber diet improve brain health? Neurosci Lett. 2016;625:56–63.
Hallert C, Bjorck I, Nyman M, Pousette A, Granno C, Svensson H. Increasing fecal butyrate in ulcerative colitis patients by diet: controlled pilot study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2003;9:116–21.
Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Fukuda S, Endo TA, Nakato G, Takahashi D, et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature. 2013;504:446–50.
Arpaia N, Campbell C, Fan X, Dikiy S, van der Veeken J, deRoos P, et al. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature. 2013;504:451–5.
Kespohl M, Vachharajani N, Luu M, Harb H, Pautz S, Wolff S, et al. The microbial metabolite butyrate induces expression of Th1-associated factors in CD4. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1036.
Luu M, Weigand K, Wedi F, Breidenbend C, Leister H, Pautz S, et al. Regulation of the effector function of CD8. Sci Rep. 2018;8:14430.
Ferreira MR, Andreyev HJN, Mohammed K, Truelove L, Gowan SM, Li J, et al. Microbiota- and radiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal side-effects (MARS) study: a large pilot study of the microbiome in acute and late-radiation enteropathy. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:6487–6500.
Xiao HW, Cui M, Li Y, Dong JL, Zhang SQ, Zhu CC, et al. Gut microbiota-derived indole 3-propionic acid protects against radiation toxicity via retaining acyl-CoA-binding protein. Microbiome. 2020;8:69.
Salvi PS, Cowles RA. Butyrate and the intestinal epithelium: modulation of proliferation and inflammation in homeostasis and disease. Cells. 2021;10:1775.
Donohoe DR, Collins LB, Wali A, Bigler R, Sun W, Bultman SJ. The Warburg effect dictates the mechanism of butyrate-mediated histone acetylation and cell proliferation. Mol Cell. 2012;48:612–26.
Vinolo MA, Rodrigues HG, Hatanaka E, Sato FT, Sampaio SC, Curi R. Suppressive effect of short-chain fatty acids on production of proinflammatory mediators by neutrophils. J Nutr Biochem. 2011;22:849–55.
Kim K, Kwon O, Ryu TY, Jung CR, Kim J, Min JK, et al. Propionate of a microbiota metabolite induces cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in lung cancer. Mol Med Rep. 2019;20:1569–74.
Semaan J, El-Hakim S, Ibrahim JN, Safi R, Elnar AA, El Boustany C. Comparative effect of sodium butyrate and sodium propionate on proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in human breast cancer cells MCF-7. Breast Cancer. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01063-6.
Then CK, Paillas S, Wang X, Hampson A, Kiltie AE. Association of Bacteroides acidifaciens relative abundance with high-fibre diet-associated radiosensitisation. BMC Biol. 2020;18:102.
Gill PA, van Zelm MC, Ffrench RA, Muir JG, Gibson PR. Successful elevation of circulating acetate and propionate by dietary modulation does not alter T-regulatory cell or cytokine profiles in healthy humans: a pilot study. Eur J Nutr. 2020;59:2651–61.
Bachem A, Makhlouf C, Binger KJ, de Souza DP, Tull D, Hochheiser K, et al. Microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids promote the memory potential of antigen-activated CD8. Immunity. 2019;51:285–97.e285.
Hatogai K, Sweis RF. The tumor microenvironment of bladder cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1296:275–90.
Winerdal ME, Marits P, Winerdal M, Hasan M, Rosenblatt R, Tolf A, et al. FOXP3 and survival in urinary bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2011;108:1672–8.
David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505:559–63.
Roos WP, Krumm A. The multifaceted influence of histone deacetylases on DNA damage signalling and DNA repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:10017–30.
Groselj B, Sharma NL, Hamdy FC, Kerr M, Kiltie AE. Histone deacetylase inhibitors as radiosensitisers: effects on DNA damage signalling and repair. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:748–54.
Park M, Kwon J, Shin HJ, Moon SM, Kim SB, Shin US, et al. Butyrate enhances the efficacy of radiotherapy via FOXO3A in colorectal cancer patient‑derived organoids. Int J Oncol. 2020;57:1307–18.
Groselj B, Ruan JL, Scott H, Gorrill J, Nicholson J, Kelly J, et al. Radiosensitization. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17:381–92.
Paillas S, Then CK, Kilgas S, Ruan JL, Thompson J, Elliott A, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin spares normal tissues while acting as an effective radiosensitizer in bladder tumors in vivo. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;107:212–21.
Vital M, Howe AC, Tiedje JM. Revealing the bacterial butyrate synthesis pathways by analyzing (meta)genomic data. mBio. 2014;5:e00889.
Belenguer A, Duncan SH, Calder AG, Holtrop G, Louis P, Lobley GE, et al. Two routes of metabolic cross-feeding between Bifidobacterium adolescentis and butyrate-producing anaerobes from the human gut. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:3593–9.
Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:506–14.
Ciorba MA. A gastroenterologist’s guide to probiotics. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:960–8.
Linn YH, Thu KK, Win NHH. Effect of probiotics for the prevention of acute radiation-induced diarrhoea among cervical cancer patients: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Probiotics Antimicro. 2019;11:638–47.
De Loera Rodriguez LH, Ortiz GG, Rivero Moragrega P, Velazquez Brizuela IE, Santoscoy Gutierrez JF, Rincon Sanchez AR, et al. Effect of symbiotic supplementation on fecal calprotectin levels and lactic acid bacteria, Bifidobacteria, Escherichia coli and Salmonella DNA in patients with cervical cancer. Nutr Hosp. 2018;35:1394–1400.
Delia P, Sansotta G, Donato V, Frosina P, Messina G, De Renzis C, et al. Use of probiotics for prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:912–5.
Salminen E, Elomaa I, Minkkinen J, Vapaatalo H, Salminen S. Preservation of intestinal integrity during radiotherapy using live lactobacillus-acidophilus cultures. Clin Radiol. 1988;39:435–7.
Urbancsek H, Kazar T, Mezes I, Neumann K. Results of a double-blind, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Antibiophilus (R) in patients with radiation-induced diarrhoea. Eur J Gastroen Hepat. 2001;13:391–6.
Holscher HD. Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes. 2017;8:172–84.
Wedlake L, Shaw C, McNair H, Lalji A, Mohammed K, Klopper T, et al. Randomized controlled trial of dietary fiber for the prevention of radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity during pelvic radiotherapy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:849–57.
Deleemans JM, Gajtani Z, Baydoun M, Reimer RA, Piedalue KA, Carlson LE. The use of prebiotic and probiotic interventions for treating gastrointestinal and psychosocial health symptoms in cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review. Integr Cancer Ther. 2021;20:15347354211061733.
Patel P, Malipatlolla DK, Devarakonda S, Bull C, Rascon A, Nyman M, et al. Dietary oat bran reduces systemic inflammation in mice subjected to pelvic irradiation. Nutrients. 2020;12:2172.
Murphy J, Stacey D, Crook J, Thompson B, Panetta D. Testing control of radiation-induced diarrhea with a psyllium bulking agent: a pilot study. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2000;10:96–100.
Garcia-Peris P, Velasco C, Hernandez M, Lozano MA, Paron L, de la Cuerda C, et al. Effect of inulin and fructo-oligosaccharide on the prevention of acute radiation enteritis in patients with gynecological cancer and impact on quality-of-life: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70:170–4.
Garcia-Peris P, Velasco C, Lozano MA, Moreno Y, Paron L, de la Cuerda C, et al. Effect of a mixture of inulin and fructo-oligosaccharide on lactobacillus and bifidobacterium intestinal microbiota of patients receiving radiotherapy; a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutricion Hospitalaria. 2012;27:1908–15.
Ahlin R, Bergmark K, Bull C, Devarakonda S, Landberg R, Sigvardsson I, et al. A preparatory study for a randomized controlled trial of dietary fiber intake during adult pelvic radiotherapy. Front Nutr. 2021;8:756485.
Hui WJ, Li T, Liu WD, Zhou CY, Gao F. Fecal microbiota transplantation for treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection: an updated randomized controlled trial meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0210016.
Ianiro G, Murri R, Sciume GD, Impagnatiello M, Masucci L, Ford AC, et al. Incidence of bloodstream infections, length of hospital stay, and survival in patients with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection treated with fecal microbiota transplantation or antibiotics: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171:695–702.
Quraishi MN, Widlak M, Bhala N, Moore D, Price M, Sharma N, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharm Ther. 2017;46:479–93.
Wang Y, Wiesnoski DH, Helmink BA, Gopalakrishnan V, Choi K, DuPont HL, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated colitis. Nat Med. 2018;24:1804–8.
Hiippala K, Jouhten H, Ronkainen A, Hartikainen A, Kainulainen V, Jalanka J, et al. The potential of gut commensals in reinforcing intestinal barrier function and alleviating inflammation. Nutrients. 2018;10:988.
Cui M, Xiao HW, Li Y, Zhou LX, Zhao SY, Luo D, et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation protects against radiation-induced toxicity. Embo Mol Med. 2017;9:448–61.
Coman V, Vodnar DC. Gut microbiota and old age: modulating factors and interventions for healthy longevity. Exp Gerontol. 2020;141:111095.
Biagi E, Nylund L, Candela M, Ostan R, Bucci L, Pini E, et al. Through ageing, and beyond: gut microbiota and inflammatory status in seniors and centenarians. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10667.
Ding X, Li Q, Li P, Chen X, Xiang L, Bi L, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation: a promising treatment for radiation enteritis? Radiother Oncol. 2020;143:12–18.
Zheng YM, He XX, Xia HH, Yuan Y, Xie WR, Cai JY, et al. Multi-donor multi-course faecal microbiota transplantation relieves the symptoms of chronic hemorrhagic radiation proctitis: a case report. Medicine. 2020;99:e22298.
Ji K, Zhang M, Du L, Liu Y, Xu C, He N, et al. Targeting the gut microbiota with inulin: a novel approach for the management of irradiation-induced colonic fibrosis. Res Square. 2022. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1394836/v1.
Zhao Z, Cheng W, Qu W, Shao G, Liu S. Antibiotic alleviates radiation-induced intestinal injury by remodeling microbiota, reducing inflammation, and inhibiting fibrosis. ACS Omega. 2020;5:2967–77.
We thank Mrs Pat Bain for her assistance in creating Fig. 1.
AEK’s salary is funded by Friends of ANCHOR and the University of Aberdeen Development Trust. CKT’s DPhil was funded by the Clarendon Fund, Balliol College, Oxford and Cancer Research UK. JK’s summer research project was funded by a Royal College of Radiologists’ Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship. The authors received no specific funding for this work.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent to publish
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Eaton, S.E., Kaczmarek, J., Mahmood, D. et al. Exploiting dietary fibre and the gut microbiota in pelvic radiotherapy patients. Br J Cancer (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01980-7
This article is cited by
Editorial: Exploiting the effect of dietary fibre on the gut microbiota in patients with pelvic radiotherapy
British Journal of Cancer (2022)