Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Cellular and Molecular Biology

The novel FGFR inhibitor F1-7 induces DNA damage and cell death in colon cells

Abstract

Background

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling influenced tumour occurrence and development. Overexpression of FGFR had been observed in many types of cancers, including colon cancer. FGFR inhibitor is considered to be effective in treating colon cancer patients.

Methods

First, the kinase inhibition rate was determined. MTT, western blotting, colony formation, EdU and comet assays were performed to evaluate the anti-tumour effects of F1-7 in vitro. RNA-seq and bioinformatics analysis were used for further verification. Additionally, a xenograft model was generated to investigate the anti-tumour effect of F1-7.

Results

F1-7 can inhibit the proliferation of colon cancer cells in vitro. It could significantly inhibit FGFR phosphorylation and its downstream signaling pathway. Whole-genome RNA-seq analysis found that the changed genes were not only functionally focused on MAPK signaling pathway but also related to cell apoptosis and ferroptosis. Experimental evidence demonstrated that F1-7 can directly increase the level of cellular DNA damage. The occurrence of DNA damage led to cell cycle arrest and inhibition of cell metastasis and cell apoptosis. Mouse model experiments also confirmed that F1-7 could inhibit tumour growth by inhibiting the FGFR pathway.

Conclusions

F1-7 exhibits anti-tumour activity by inhibiting the FGFR pathway. It could be a novel therapeutic agent for targeting colon cancer cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: F1-7 inhibiting phosphorylation of FGFR in colon cancer.
Fig. 2: Colon cancer cells transcriptome level was influenced by F1-7.
Fig. 3: F1-7 induced colon cancer cells apoptosis and ferroptosis.
Fig. 4: F1-7 induced colon cancer cells DNA damage.
Fig. 5: Effects of F1-7 on colon cancer cell cycle.
Fig. 6: F1-7 showed promising efficacy to suppress colon cancer cells proliferation.
Fig. 7: The anti-tumour activity of F1-7 in vivo.
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66:683–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murakawa T. Past, present, and future perspectives of pulmonary metastasectomy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Today. 2021;51:204–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng YD, Yang H, Chen GQ, Zhang ZC. Molecularly targeted drugs for metastatic colorectal cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013;7:1315–22.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Touat M, Ileana E, Postel-Vinay S, Andre F, Soria JC. Targeting FGFR signaling in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2684–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Formisano L, Lu Y, Servetto A, Hanker AB, Jansen VM, Bauer JA, et al. Aberrant FGFR signaling mediates resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Porta R, Borea R, Coelho A, Khan S, Araujo A, Reclusa P, et al. FGFR a promising druggable target in cancer: Molecular biology and new drugs. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;113:256–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gozgit JM, Wong MJ, Moran L, Wardwell S, Mohemmad QK, Narasimhan NI, et al. Ponatinib (AP24534), a multitargeted pan-FGFR inhibitor with activity in multiple FGFR-amplified or mutated cancer models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11:690–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma WW, Xie H, Fetterly G, Pitzonka L, Whitworth A, LeVea C, et al. A phase Ib study of the FGFR/VEGFR inhibitor dovitinib with gemcitabine and capecitabine in advanced solid tumor and pancreatic cancer patients. Am J Clin Oncol. 2019;42:184–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guffanti F, Chila R, Bello E, Zucchetti M, Zangarini M, Ceriani L, et al. In vitro and in vivo activity of lucitanib in FGFR1/2 amplified or mutated cancer models. Neoplasia. 2017;19:35–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Steegmann JL, Baccarani M, Breccia M, Casado LF, Garcia-Gutierrez V, Hochhaus A, et al. European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2016;30:1648–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gavine PR, Mooney L, Kilgour E, Thomas AP, Al-Kadhimi K, Beck S, et al. AZD4547: an orally bioavailable, potent, and selective inhibitor of the fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase family. Cancer Res. 2012;72:2045–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Komla-Ebri D, Dambroise E, Kramer I, Benoist-Lasselin C, Kaci N, Le Gall C, et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor NVP-BGJ398 functionally improves FGFR3-related dwarfism in mouse model. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:1871–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu D, Guo M, Min X, Dai S, Li M, Tan S, et al. LY2874455 potently inhibits FGFR gatekeeper mutants and overcomes mutation-based resistance. Chem Commun (Camb). 2018;54:12089–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Q, Yu S, Zhao W, Qin S, Chu Q, Wu K. EGFR-TKIs resistance via EGFR-independent signaling pathways. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin S, Yang L, Yao Y, Xu L, Xiang Y, Zhao H, et al. Flubendazole demonstrates valid antitumor effects by inhibiting STAT3 and activating autophagy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Qiu Y, Xiao Z, Wang Y, Zhang D, Zhang W, Wang G, et al. Optimization and anti-inflammatory evaluation of methyl gallate derivatives as a myeloid differentiation protein 2 inhibitor. Bioorg Med Chem. 2019;27:115049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu HR, Meng LH, Huang M, Zhu H, Miao ZH, Ding J. DNA damage, c-myc suppression and apoptosis induced by the novel topoisomerase II inhibitor, salvicine, in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2005;55:286–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16:284–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wenger T, Miller D, Evans K. FGFR Craniosynostosis Syndromes Overview. In: MP Adam et al. (eds). GeneReviews®. October 20, 1998.

  20. Liu Y, Cao M, Cai Y, Li X, Zhao C, Cui R. Dissecting the role of the FGF19-FGFR4 signaling pathway in cancer development and progression. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. von Mering C, Huynen M, Jaeggi D, Schmidt S, Bork P, Snel B. STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:258–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou L, Wang S, Cao L, Ren X, Li Y, Shao J, et al. Lead acetate induces apoptosis in Leydig cells by activating PPARgamma/caspase-3/PARP pathway. Int J Environ Health Res. 2021;31:34–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maes ME, Grosser JA, Fehrman RL, Schlamp CL, Nickells RW. Completion of BAX recruitment correlates with mitochondrial fission during apoptosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9:16565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Willis S, Day CL, Hinds MG, Huang DC. The Bcl-2-regulated apoptotic pathway. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:4053–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuo LJ, Yang LX. Gamma-H2AX—a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks. Vivo. 2008;22:305–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang Y, Xue K, Li Z, Zheng W, Dong W, Song J, et al. [Corrigendum] cMyc regulates the CDK1/cyclin B1 dependentG2/M cell cycle progression by histone H4 acetylation in Raji cells. Int J Mol Med. 2019;44:1988.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Katoh M, Nakagama H. FGF receptors: cancer biology and therapeutics. Med Res Rev. 2014;34:280–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hall A. The cytoskeleton and cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009;28:5–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fuhrmann A, Banisadr A, Beri P, Tlsty TD, Engler AJ. Metastatic state of cancer cells may be indicated by adhesion strength. Biophys J. 2017;112:736–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Venetsanakos E, Brameld KA, Phan VT, Verner E, Owens TD, Xing Y, et al. The irreversible covalent fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor PRN1371 exhibits sustained inhibition of FGFR after drug clearance. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16:2668–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tan L, Wang J, Tanizaki J, Huang Z, Aref AR, Rusan M, et al. Development of covalent inhibitors that can overcome resistance to first-generation FGFR kinase inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E4869–4877.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lu X, Chen H, Patterson AV, Smaill JB, Ding K. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) selective inhibitors as hepatocellular carcinoma therapy: advances and prospects. J Med Chem. 2019;62:2905–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sootome H, Fujita H, Ito K, Ochiiwa H, Fujioka Y, Ito K, et al. Futibatinib is a novel irreversible FGFR 1-4 inhibitor that shows selective antitumor activity against FGFR-deregulated tumors. Cancer Res. 2020;80:4986–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kang X, Lin Z, Xu M, Pan J, Wang ZW. Deciphering role of FGFR signalling pathway in pancreatic cancer. Cell Prolif. 2019;52:e12605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Funding of China (81473242, 21877085 and 21602159).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YC and XZ contributed to the conception of the study; YL, LZ and XC performed the experiment; FH and XS revised and complemented the figure; DC and JS contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation; YL performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript; JW, QX and YX helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Youqun Xiang, Xiaohui Zheng or Yuepiao Cai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study was approved by ‘the Laboratory Animal Centre, Wenzhou Medical University’ (wydw2020-0886).

Consent for publication

No personal data or identifying information are being submitted.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, X. et al. The novel FGFR inhibitor F1-7 induces DNA damage and cell death in colon cells. Br J Cancer 127, 1014–1025 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01878-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01878-4

Search

Quick links