Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Translational Therapeutics

Upregulation of CXCL1 and LY9 contributes to BRCAness in ovarian cancer and mediates response to PARPi and immune checkpoint blockade

Abstract

Background

Mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) cause homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Ovarian cancer (OvCa) patients harbouring HRD beyond BRCA1/2 mutation result in a state referred to as “BRCAness”. OvCa with BRCAness could benefit from PARP inhibitors. This study aims to identify a signature to detect the BRCAness population at the transcriptome level.

Methods

We used a rank-based algorithm to develop a qualitative BRCAness signature for OvCa. Upregulation of CXCL1 with downregulation of SV2A and upregulation of LY9 with downregulation of CHRNB3 were constructed as the BRCAness signature (2 gene pairs, 2-GPS) for OvCa.

Results

OvCa samples that were classified as BRCAness by 2-GPS showed improved overall survival, progression-free survival and exhibited increased multi-omics alterations in homologous recombination genes and enhanced sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade. BRCAness cells were sensitive to PARP inhibitors. By biological experiments, we validated SKOV3 cells and patients with HRD exhibited higher expression of CXCL1 than SV2A and higher expression of LY9 than CHRNB3 at mRNA level. Both SKOV3 and A2780 with HRD were sensitive to mitomycin C, cisplatin and olaparib.

Conclusions

In conclusion, 2-GPS could robustly predict BRCAness OvCa at the individual level and extend the population who may benefit from PARP inhibitors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: 2-GPS, the prognostic performance and the multi-omics landscape of BRCAness.
Fig. 2: Functional analysis of BRCAness-related genes.
Fig. 3: Immune landscape in OvCa with BRCAness.
Fig. 4: Drug efficacy in BRCAness cells and DDR-related BRCAness interaction network.
Fig. 5: Construction of HRD in OvCa cells and cell viability assay.
Fig. 6: The expression of 2-GPS in OvCa cells and patients.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and analysed during this study are available from public databases.

Code availability

Codes are implemented in the R environment and are publicly available on GitHub: https://github.com/ttchen0714/BRCAness-signature.

References

  1. Patel PS, Algouneh A, Hakem R. Exploiting synthetic lethality to target BRCA1/2-deficient tumors: where we stand. Oncogene. 2021;40:3001–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stover EH, Fuh K, Konstantinopoulos PA, Matulonis UA, Liu JF. Clinical assays for assessment of homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;159:887–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yan S, Xuan J, Brajanovski N, Tancock MRC, Madhamshettiwar PB, Simpson KJ, et al. The RNA polymerase I transcription inhibitor CX-5461 cooperates with topoisomerase 1 inhibition by enhancing the DNA damage response in homologous recombination-proficient high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021;124:616–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai C. A Novel mechanism to induce BRCAness in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2020;80:2977–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gadducci A, Guerrieri ME. PARP inhibitors alone and in combination with other biological agents in homologous recombination deficient epithelial ovarian cancer: from the basic research to the clinic. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;114:153–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zoumpoulidou G, Alvarez-Mendoza C, Mancusi C, Ahmed RM, Denman M, Steele CD, et al. Therapeutic vulnerability to PARP1,2 inhibition in RB1-mutant osteosarcoma. Nat Commun. 2021;12:7064.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shen J, Zhao W, Ju Z, Wang L, Peng Y, Labrie M, et al. PARPi triggers the STING-dependent immune response and enhances the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade independent of BRCAness. Cancer Res. 2019;79:311–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Y, Tong Z, Zhang W, Zhang W, Buzdin A, Mu X, et al. FDA-approved and emerging next generation predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients. Front Oncol. 2021;11:683419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pellegrino B, Musolino A, Llop-Guevara A, Serra V, De Silva P, Hlavata Z, et al. Homologous recombination repair deficiency and the immune response in breast cancer: a Literature Review. Transl Oncol. 2020;13:410–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cancer Genome Atlas Research, N. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474:609–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amuzu S, Carmona E, Mes-Masson AM, Greenwood CMT, Tonin PN, Ragoussis J. Candidate markers of olaparib response from genomic data analyses of human cancer cell lines. Cancers. 2021;13:1296.

  12. Borcsok J, Diossy M, Sztupinszki Z, Prosz A, Tisza V, Spisak S, et al. Detection of molecular signatures of homologous recombination deficiency in bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:3734–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garsed DW, Alsop K, Fereday S, Emmanuel C, Kennedy CJ, Etemadmoghadam D, et al. Homologous recombination DNA repair pathway disruption and retinoblastoma protein loss are associated with exceptional survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:569–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hess JM, Bernards A, Kim J, Miller M, Taylor-Weiner A, Haradhvala NJ, et al. Passenger hotspot mutations in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2019;36:288–301.e214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Konstantinopoulos PA, Spentzos D, Karlan BY, Taniguchi T, Fountzilas E, Francoeur N, et al. Gene expression profile of BRCAness that correlates with responsiveness to chemotherapy and with outcome in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3555–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Qi L, Li T, Shi G, Wang J, Li X, Zhang S, et al. An individualized gene expression signature for prediction of lung adenocarcinoma metastases. Mol Oncol. 2017;11:1630–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen T, Zhao Z, Chen B, Wang Y, Yang F, Wang C, et al. An individualized transcriptional signature to predict the epithelial-mesenchymal transition based on relative expression ordering. Aging. 2020;12:13172–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Weinstein JN, Collisson EA, Mills GB, Shaw KR, Ozenberger BA, et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1113–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Riaz N, Havel JJ, Makarov V, Desrichard A, Urba WJ, Sims JS, et al. Tumor and microenvironment evolution during immunotherapy with nivolumab. Cell. 2017;171:934–49.e916.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kemp SB, Carpenter ES, Steele NG, Donahue KL, Nwosu ZC, Pacheco A, et al. Apolipoprotein E promotes immune suppression in pancreatic cancer through NF-kappaB-mediated production of CXCL1. Cancer Res. 2021;81:4305–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Seitz S, Dreyer TF, Stange C, Steiger K, Brauer R, Scheutz L, et al. CXCL9 inhibits tumour growth and drives anti-PD-L1 therapy in ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01763-0.

  22. Stok C, Kok YP, van den Tempel N, van Vugt M. Shaping the BRCAness mutational landscape by alternative double-strand break repair, replication stress and mitotic aberrancies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:4239–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sztupinszki Z, Diossy M, Krzystanek M, Borcsok J, Pomerantz MM, Tisza V, et al. Detection of molecular signatures of homologous recombination deficiency in prostate cancer with or without BRCA1/2 Mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:2673–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Telli ML, Timms KM, Reid J, Hennessy B, Mills GB, Jensen KC, et al. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score predicts response to platinum-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:3764–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Severson TM, Wolf DM, Yau C, Peeters J, Wehkam D, Schouten PC, et al. The BRCA1ness signature is associated significantly with response to PARP inhibitor treatment versus control in the I-SPY 2 randomized neoadjuvant setting. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19:99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nero C, Ciccarone F, Pietragalla A, Duranti S, Daniele G, Salutari V, et al. Ovarian cancer treatments strategy: focus on PARP inhibitors and immune check point inhibitors. Cancers. 2021;13:1298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Germano G, Lamba S, Rospo G, Barault L, Magri A, Maione F, et al. Inactivation of DNA repair triggers neoantigen generation and impairs tumour growth. Nature. 2017;552:116–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pantelidou C, Sonzogni O, De Oliveria Taveira M, Mehta AK, Kothari A, Wang D, et al. PARP inhibitor efficacy depends on CD8(+) T-cell recruitment via intratumoral STING pathway activation in BRCA-deficient models of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:722–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Veneris JT, Matulonis UA, Liu JF, Konstantinopoulos PA. Choosing wisely: Selecting PARP inhibitor combinations to promote anti-tumor immune responses beyond BRCA mutations. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156:488–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shi Z, Zhao Q, Lv B, Qu X, Han X, Wang H, et al. Identification of biomarkers complementary to homologous recombination deficiency for improving the clinical outcome of ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11:e399.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mehta AK, Cheney EM, Hartl CA, Pantelidou C, Oliwa M, Castrillon JA, et al. Targeting immunosuppressive macrophages overcomes PARP inhibitor resistance in BRCA1-associated triple-negative breast cancer. Nat Cancer. 2021;2:66–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61673143 to YG; No. 81673036 to YX), the Outstanding Youth Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (No. YQ2021H005 to YG) and the HMU Marshal Initiative Funding (No. HMUMIF-21023 to YG and HL).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YX and YYG conceived the original idea and supervised the study. TTC carried out the data processing, analysis and wrote the manuscript; TY carried out the biological experiment and wrote the manuscript; SPZ, YDG, LQA, BC, ZXZ and YWL. carried out the data collection. JWX, JHW and HHL carried out the biological experiment. All authors have approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yan Xu or Yunyan Gu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committees at Harbin Medical University. All patients or their guardians provided written informed consent prior to obtaining samples. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, T., Yu, T., Zhuang, S. et al. Upregulation of CXCL1 and LY9 contributes to BRCAness in ovarian cancer and mediates response to PARPi and immune checkpoint blockade. Br J Cancer 127, 916–926 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01836-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01836-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links