There is currently a strong development of therapeutic combinations with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). The most promising combinations with CPIs concern anti-angiogenic agents and BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The timing of the initiation of the combination should be particularly well investigated for chemotherapy. Combinations between CPIs raise questions about risk/benefit ratio and overall clinical activity.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.96 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Steinberg SM, Zhang P, Malik BT, Boni A, Shabaneh TB, Byrne KT, et al. BRAF inhibition alleviates immune suppression in murine autochthonous melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:1044–50. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0074
Lee WS, Yang H, Chon HJ, Kim C. Combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade normalizes vascular-immune crosstalk to potentiate cancer immunity. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52:1475–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-00500-y
Ferris RL, Lenz HJ, Trotta AM, García-Foncillas J, Schulten J, Audhuy F, et al. Rationale for combination of therapeutic antibodies targeting tumor cells and immune checkpoint receptors: Harnessing innate and adaptive immunity through IgG1 isotype immune effector stimulation. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;63:48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.11.008
Fountzilas C, Bajor DL, Mukherjee S, Saltzman J, Witkiewicz AK, Maguire O, et al. Phase Ib/II study of cetuximab plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced RAS wild-type colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:6726–36. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1650
Pfirschke C, Engblom C, Rickelt S, Cortez-Retamozo V, Garris C, Pucci F, et al. Immunogenic chemotherapy sensitizes tumors to checkpoint blockade therapy. Immunity. 2016;44:343–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2015.11.024
Okita R, Maeda A, Shimizu K, Nojima Y, Saisho S, Nakata M. Effect of platinum-based chemotherapy on the expression of natural killer group 2 member D ligands, programmed cell death-1 ligand 1 and HLA class i in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Rep. 2019;42:839–48. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7185
Long GV, Robert C, Butler MO, Couture F, Carlino MS, O’Day S, et al. Standard-dose pembrolizumab plus alternate-dose ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: KEYNOTE-029 cohort 1C, a phase 2 randomized study of two dosing schedules. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:5280–8. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0793
Goel S, DeCristo MJ, Watt AC, BrinJones H, Sceneay J, Li BB, et al. CDK4/6 inhibition triggers anti-tumour immunity. Nature. 2017;548:471–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23465
Zhang J, Bu X, Wang H, Zhu Y, Geng Y, Nihira NT, et al. Cyclin D–CDK4 kinase destabilizes PD-L1 via cullin 3–SPOP to control cancer immune surveillance. Nature. 2018;553:91–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25015
Shen J, Zhao W, Ju Z, Wang L, Peng Y, Labrie M, et al. PARPI triggers the STING-dependent immune response and enhances the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade independent of BRCANEss. Cancer Res. 2019;79:311–9. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1003
Lucibello G, Mograbi B, Milano G, Hofman P, Brest P. PD-L1 regulation revisited: impact on immunotherapeutic strategies. Trends Mol Med. 2021;27:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2021.06.005
Palmer AC, Izar B, Hwangbo H, Sorger PK. Predictable clinical benefits without evidence of synergy in trials of combination therapies with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:368–77. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2275
Meric-Bernstam F, Larkin J, Tabernero J, Bonini C. Enhancing anti-tumour efficacy with immunotherapy combinations. Lancet. 2021;397:1010–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32598-8
We would like to thank the UCA Office of International Scientific Visibility for comments on the English version of the manuscript.
Funding is acknowledged from the French Government (Agence Nationale de Recherche, ANR) through the ‘Investments for the Future’ LABEX SIGNALIFE (ANR-11-LABX-0028-01 and IDEX UCAJedi ANR-15-IDEX-01) and [AD-ME project R19162DD]; CANC’AIR Genexposomic project, Canceropole PACA; DREAL PACA, ARS PACA, Région Sud, INSERM cancer; INCA Plan Cancer; Children Medical Safety Research Institute (CMSRI, Vaccinophagy project R17033DJA).
PB and BM declare no financial ties with any organisation that might have an interest in the submitted work over the previous 3 years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. GM has received honoraria from MERCK, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) for lectures specifically on the covered subject. PH has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Lilly, Bayer, Pfizer, ThermoFisher, Roche, Illumina, Novartis, Biocartis, Janssen and Abbvie for lectures, consulting fees and membership on their advisory board.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable for this comment.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Brest, P., Refae, S., Mograbi, B. et al. Checkpoint inhibitors in a marriage: consented or arranged?. Br J Cancer 126, 1834–1836 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01820-8