Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Clinical Studies

Efficacy of first-line atezolizumab combination therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving proton pump inhibitors: post hoc analysis of IMpower150

Abstract

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used concomitant to cancer treatment and they induce gut microbiota changes. It is increasingly apparent that gut dysbiosis can reduce the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, little is known about PPI effects on outcomes with ICIs, particularly in combination, ICI approaches.

Methods

Post hoc, Cox proportional hazard analysis of phase III trial, IMpower150 was conducted to assess the association between PPI use and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in chemotherapy-naive, metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer participants randomised atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ACP), bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (BCP), or atezolizumab plus BCP (ABCP). PPI use was defined as any PPI administration between 30 days prior and 30 days after treatment initiation.

Results

Of 1202 participants, 441 (37%) received a PPI. PPI use was independently associated with worse OS (n = 748; hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.53 [1.21–1.95], P < 0.001) and PFS (1.34 [1.12–1.61], P = 0.002) in the pooled atezolizumab arms (ACP plus ABCP). This association was not apparent for BCP (n = 368; OS 1.01 [0.73–1.39], P = 0.969; PFS 0.97 [0.76–1.25], P = 0.827). The observed OS treatment effect (HR 95% CI) of the atezolizumab (ACP plus ABCP) arms vs BCP was 1.03 (0.77–1.36) for PPI users compared to 0.68 (0.54–0.86) for non-users (P [interaction] = 0.028). A similar association was noted for ABCP vs BCP (PPI users 0.96 [0.68–1.35]; PPI non-users 0.66 [0.50–0.87]; P [interaction] = 0.095).

Conclusions

PPI use was a negative prognostic marker in patients treated with ACP or ABCP, but not BCP. The analysis suggests that PPIs negatively influence the magnitude of ICI efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Kaplan Meier estimate of survival outcomes for PPI user’s vs non-users.
Fig. 2: Kaplan Meier estimates of survival outcomes in the randomised arms of IMpower150.

Data availability

Data were accessed according to Roche’s policy and process for clinical study data sharing and are available upon request at vivli.org.

Code availability

Available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Hanna NH, Schneider BJ, Temin S, Baker S Jr., Brahmer J, Ellis PM, et al. Therapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer without driver alterations: ASCO and OH (CCO) Joint Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1608–32. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.19.03022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hopkins AM, Rowland A, Kichenadasse G, Wiese MD, Gurney H, McKinnon RA, et al. Predicting response and toxicity to immune checkpoint inhibitors using routinely available blood and clinical markers. Br J Cancer. 2017;117:913–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hopkins AM, Kichenadasse G, Garrett-Mayer E, Karapetis CS, Rowland A, Sorich MJ. Development and validation of a prognostic model for patients with advanced lung cancer treated with the immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:3280–6. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2968.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kichenadasse G, Miners JO, Mangoni AA, Rowland A, Hopkins AM, Sorich MJ. Multiorgan immune-related adverse events during treatment with atezolizumab. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18:1191–9. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2020.7567.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chalabi M, Cardona A, Nagarkar DR, Dhawahir Scala A, Gandara DR, Rittmeyer A. et al. Efficacy of chemotherapy and atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors: pooled post hoc analyses of the OAK and POPLAR trials. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:525–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bai R, Chen N, Li L, Du N, Bai L, Lv Z. et al. Mechanisms of cancer resistance to immunotherapy. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1290–1290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01290.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fares CM, Allen EMV, Drake CG, Allison JP, Hu-Lieskovan S. Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade: why does checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy not work for all patients? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019;147–64. https://doi.org/10.1200/edbk_240837.

  8. Hopkins AM, Kichenadasse G, Karapetis CS, Rowland A, Sorich MJ. Concomitant antibiotic use and survival in urothelial carcinoma treated with atezolizumab. Eur Urol. 2020;78:540–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elkrief A, Derosa L, Kroemer G, Zitvogel L, Routy B. The negative impact of antibiotics on outcomes in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: a new independent prognostic factor? Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1572–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kichenadasse G, Miners JO, Mangoni AA, Rowland A, Hopkins AM, Sorich MJ. Association between body mass index and overall survival with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:512–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hopkins AM, Kichenadasse G, Abuhelwa AY, McKinnon RA, Rowland A, Sorich MJ. Value of the lung immune prognostic index in patients with non-small cell lung cancer initiating first-line atezolizumab combination therapy: subgroup analysis of the IMPOWER150 Trial. Cancers. 2021;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13051176.

  12. Vivarelli S, Salemi R, Candido S, Falzone L, Santagati M, Stefani S, et al. Gut microbiota and cancer: from pathogenesis to therapy. Cancers. 2019;11:38. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11010038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, Duong CPM, Alou MT, Daillere R, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science. 2018;359:91–97. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan3706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matson V, Fessler J, Bao R, Chongsuwat T, Zha Y, Alegre ML, et al. The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Science. 2018;359:104–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer CN, Nezi L, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Karpinets TV, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science. 2018;359:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan4236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Imhann F, Bonder MJ, Vich Vila A, Fu J, Mujagic Z, Vork L, et al. Proton pump inhibitors affect the gut microbiome. Gut. 2016;65:740–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson MA, Goodrich JK, Maxan M-E, Freedberg DE, Abrams JA, Poole AC, et al. Proton pump inhibitors alter the composition of the gut microbiota. Gut. 2016;65:749–56. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310861.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson MA, Verdi S, Maxan M-E, Shin CM, Zierer J, Bowyer RCE, et al. Gut microbiota associations with common diseases and prescription medications in a population-based cohort. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2655. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05184-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Le Bastard Q, Al-Ghalith GA, Grégoire M, Chapelet G, Javaudin F, Dailly E, et al. Systematic review: human gut dysbiosis induced by non-antibiotic prescription medications. Aliment Pharm Ther. 2018;47:332–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maier L, Pruteanu M, Kuhn M, Zeller G, Telzerow A, Anderson EE, et al. Extensive impact of non-antibiotic drugs on human gut bacteria. Nature. 2018;555:623. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Li M, Zeng C, Yao J, Ge Y, An G. The association between proton pump inhibitors use and clinical outcome of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;88:106972 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hopkins AM, Kichenadasse G, Karapetis CS, Rowland A, Sorich MJ. Concomitant proton pump inhibitor use and survival in urothelial carcinoma treated with atezolizumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:5487–93. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1876.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reck M, Mok TSK, Nishio M, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, Orlandi F, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower150): key subgroup analyses of patients with EGFR mutations or baseline liver metastases in a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7:387–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30084-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, Orlandi F, Stroyakovskiy D, Nogami N, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N. Engl J Med. 2018;378:2288–301. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716948.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF. Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1446–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Fais S. Evidence-based support for the use of proton pump inhibitors in cancer therapy. J Transl Med. 2015;13:368. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0735-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang B-Y, Zhang J, Wang J-L, Sun S, Wang Z-H, Wang L-P, et al. Intermittent high dose proton pump inhibitor enhances the antitumor effects of chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:85–85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-015-0194-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cortellini A, Di Maio M, Nigro O, Leonetti A, Cortinovis DL, Aerts JG, et al. Differential influence of antibiotic therapy and other medications on oncological outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab versus cytotoxic chemotherapy. J J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e002421. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-002421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mukherjee S, Ibrahimi S, Khalid B, Roman D, Zhao D, Aljumaily R. Do proton pump inhibitors modulate the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy? A retrospective study. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019;25:762–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155218771152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Homicsko K, Richtig G, Tuchmann F, Tsourti Z, Hanahan D, Coukos G, et al. Abstract LBA2: proton pump inhibitors negatively impact survival of PD-1 inhibitor based therapies in metastatic melanoma patients. Ann Oncol. 2018;29 Suppl 10. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy511.001.

  31. Trabolsi A, Winter M, Rodriguez E. Abstract e14092: proton pump inhibitors and response to immune check-point inhibitors: single center study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37 Suppl 15. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e14092.

  32. Afzal MZ, Shirai K. Abstract e21040: What impact do the proton pump inhibitors have on the efficacy of immune check point inhibitors in metastatic malignant melanoma? J Clin Oncol. 2019;37 Suppl 15. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e21040.

  33. Failing JJ, Finnes HD, Kottschade LA, Allred JB, Markovic SN. Effects of commonly used chronic medications on the outcomes of ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2016;26:609–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/cmr.0000000000000299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH, Hunter DJ, Drazen JM. Statistics in medicine—reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N. Engl J Med. 2007;357:2189–94.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr077003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Forgacs I, Loganayagam A. Overprescribing proton pump inhibitors. BMJ. 2008;336:2–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39406.449456.BE.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

RAM, AR and MJS are supported by Beat Cancer Research Fellowships from Cancer Council South Australia. AMH is supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the National Breast Cancer Foundation, Australia (PF-17-007). Data access and salary of AYA was supported by funding from an Australian, Tour de Cure Early Career Research Grant (RSP-155-18/19). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit. This publication is based on research using data from Roche that has been made available through Vivli, Inc. Vivli has not contributed to or approved, and is not in any way responsible for the contents of this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: AMH, AR and MJS. Development of methodology: AMH, GK, CSK, AR and MJS. Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): AMH, AYA, AR and MJS. Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g. statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): AMH, GK, RAMK, AYA, CSK, AR and MJS. Writing, review and/or revision of the manuscript: AMH, GK, RAMK, AYA, CSK, AR and MJS. Administrative, technical or material support (i.e. reporting or organising data, constructing databases): AMH, RAMK, AR and MJS. Study supervision: AMH, RAMK, AR and MJS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley M. Hopkins.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

RAM, AR and MJS report investigator-initiated project grants from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. CSK reports advisory board roles with AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Roche, outside the submitted work. GK, AYA, AMH, SB and JML declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Secondary analysis of anonymized clinical trial data was confirmed negligible risk research by the Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Office for Research and Ethics and was exempt from review.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hopkins, A.M., Kichenadasse, G., McKinnon, R.A. et al. Efficacy of first-line atezolizumab combination therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving proton pump inhibitors: post hoc analysis of IMpower150. Br J Cancer 126, 42–47 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01606-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01606-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links