Abstract
Background
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a critical metabolic enzyme. LDH A (LDHA) overexpression is a hallmark of aggressive malignancies and has been linked to tumour initiation, reprogramming and progression in multiple tumour types. However, successful LDHA inhibition strategies have not materialised in the translational and clinical space. We sought to develop a rational strategy for LDHA suppression in the context of solid tumour treatment.
Methods
We utilised a doxycycline-inducible short hairpin RNA (shRNA) system to generate LDHA suppression. Lactate and LDH activity levels were measured biochemically and kinetically using hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. We evaluated effects of LDHA suppression on cellular proliferation and clonogenic survival, as well as on tumour growth, in orthotopic models of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), alone or in combination with radiation.
Results
shRNA suppression of LDHA generated a time-dependent decrease in LDH activity with transient shifts in intracellular lactate levels, a decrease in carbon flux from pyruvate into lactate and compensatory shifts in metabolic flux in glycolysis and the Krebs cycle. LDHA suppression decreased cellular proliferation and temporarily stunted tumour growth in ATC and HNSCC xenografts but did not by itself result in tumour cure, owing to the maintenance of residual viable cells. Only when chronic LDHA suppression was combined with radiation was a functional cure achieved.
Conclusions
Successful targeting of LDHA requires exquisite dose and temporal control without significant concomitant off-target toxicity. Combinatorial strategies with conventional radiation are feasible as long as the suppression is targeted, prolonged and non-toxic.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Warburg, O., Wind, F. & Negelein, E. The metabolism of tumors in the body. J. Gen. Physiol. 8, 519–530 (1927).
Gatenby, R. A. & Gillies, R. J. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 891–899 (2004).
Li, X. B., Gu, J. D. & Zhou, Q. H. Review of aerobic glycolysis and its key enzymes–new targets for lung cancer therapy. Thorac. Cancer 6, 17–24 (2015).
Annibaldi, A. & Widmann, C. Glucose metabolism in cancer cells. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 13, 466–470 (2010).
Sandulache, V. C., Skinner, H. D., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Dodge, C. T., Ow, T. J. et al. Glycolytic inhibition alters anaplastic thyroid carcinoma tumor metabolism and improves response to conventional chemotherapy and radiation. Mol. Cancer Ther. 11, 1373–1380 (2012).
Woo, S. H., Sandulache, V. C., Yang, L. & Skinner, H. D. Evaluating response to metformin/cisplatin combination in cancer cells via metabolic measurement and clonogenic survival. Methods Mol Biol. 1165, 11–18 (2014).
Billiard, J., Dennison, J. B., Briand, J., Annan, R. S., Chai, D., Colón, M. et al. Quinoline 3-sulfonamides inhibit lactate dehydrogenase A and reverse aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells. Cancer Metab. 1, 19 (2013).
Yeung, C., Gibson, A. E., Issaq, S. H., Oshima, N., Baumgart, J. T., Edessa, L. D. et al. Targeting glycolysis through inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase impairs tumor growth in preclinical models of Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Res. 79, 5060–5073 (2019).
Yecies, J. L. & Manning, B. D. mTOR links oncogenic signaling to tumor cell metabolism. J. Mol. Med. 89, 221–228 (2011).
Shackelford, D. B., Vasquez, D. S., Corbeil, J., Wu, S., Leblanc, M., Wu, C.-L. et al. mTOR and HIF-1α-mediated tumor metabolism in an LKB1 mouse model of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11137–11142 (2009).
Adeva-Andany, M., Lopez-Ojen, M., Funcasta-Calderon, R., Ameneiros-Rodriguez, E., Donapetry-Garcia, C., Vila-Altesor, M. et al. Comprehensive review on lactate metabolism in human health. Mitochondrion 17, 76–100 (2014).
Rong, Y., Wu, W., Ni, X., Kuang, T., Jin, D., Wang, D. et al. Lactate dehydrogenase A is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and promotes the growth of pancreatic cancer cells. Tumor Biol. 34, 1523–1530 (2013).
Markert, C. L., Shaklee, J. B. & Whitt, G. S. Evolution of a gene. Multiple genes for LDH isozymes provide a model of the evolution of gene structure, function and regulation. Science 189, 102–114 (1975).
Xie, H., Valera, V. A., Merino, M. J., Amato, A. M., Signoretti, S., Linehan, W. M. et al. LDH-A inhibition, a therapeutic strategy for treatment of hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 8, 626–635 (2009).
Fantin, V. R., St-Pierre, J. & Leder, P. Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance. Cancer Cell 9, 425–434 (2006).
Le, A., Cooper, C. R., Gouw, A. M., Dinavahi, R., Maitra, A., Deck, L. M. et al. Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase A induces oxidative stress and inhibits tumor progression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2037–2042 (2010).
Mohajertehran, F., Ayatollahi, H., Jafarian, A. H., Khazaeni, K., Soukhtanloo, M., Shakeri, M. T. et al. Overexpression of lactate dehydrogenase in the saliva and tissues of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Rep. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 7, 142–149 (2019).
Thonsri, U., Seubwai, W., Waraasawapati, S., Sawanyawisuth, K., Vaeteewoottacharn, K., Boonmars, T. et al. Overexpression of lactate dehydrogenase A in cholangiocarcinoma is correlated with poor prognosis. Histol. Histopathol. 32, 503–510 (2017).
Sandulache, V. C., Chen, Y., Skinner, H. D., Lu, T., Feng, L., Myers, J. N. et al. Acute tumor lactate perturbations as a biomarker of genotoxic stress: development of a biochemical model. Mol. Cancer Ther. 14, 2901–2908 (2015).
Yu, W., Chen, Y., Dubrulle, J., Stossi, F., Putluri, V., Sreekumar, A. et al. Cisplatin generates oxidative stress which is accompanied by rapid shifts in central carbon metabolism. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–12 (2018).
Le, X., Huang, A. T., Chen, Y. & Lai, S. Y. Regulation of receptor tyrosine kinases by miRNA overexpression of miRNA using lentiviral inducible expression vectors. Methods Mol Biol. 1233, 135–147 (2015).
Wu, X., Bhayani, M. K., Dodge, C. T., Nicoloso, M. S., Chen, Y., Yan, X. et al. Coordinated targeting of the EGFR signaling axis by microRNA-27a. Oncotarget 4, 1388 (2013).
Franken, N. A., Rodermond, H. M., Stap, J., Haveman, J. & van Bree, C. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2315–2319 (2006).
Lee, J., Ramirez, M. S., Walker, C. M., Chen, Y., Yi, S., Sandulache, V. C. et al. High-throughput hyperpolarized (13)C metabolic investigations using a multi-channel acquisition system. J. Magn. Reson. 260, 20–27 (2015).
Gohlke, J. H., Lloyd, S. M., Basu, S., Putluri, V., Vareed, S. K., Rasaily, U. et al. Methionine-homocysteine pathway in African-American Prostate Cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 3, pkz019 (2019).
Vantaku, V., Putluri, V., Bader, D. A., Maity, S., Ma, J., Arnold, J. M. et al. Epigenetic loss of AOX1 expression via EZH2 leads to metabolic deregulations and promotes bladder cancer progression. Oncogene https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0902-7 (2019).
Vantaku, V., Dong, J., Ambati, C. R., Perera, D., Donepudi, S. R., Amara, C. S. et al. Multi-omics integration analysis robustly predicts high-grade patient survival and identifies CPT1B effect on fatty acid metabolism in bladder cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 3689–3701 (2019).
Wu, M., Neilson, A., Swift, A. L., Moran, R., Tamagnine, J., Parslow, D. et al. Multiparameter metabolic analysis reveals a close link between attenuated mitochondrial bioenergetic function and enhanced glycolysis dependency in human tumor cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 292, C125–C136 (2007).
Sandulache, V. C., Skinner, H. D., Ow, T. J., Zhang, A., Xia, X., Luchak, J. M. et al. Individualizing antimetabolic treatment strategies for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma based on TP53 mutational status. Cancer 118, 711–721 (2012).
Sandulache, V. C., Chen, Y., Lee, J., Rubinstein, A., Ramirez, M. S., Skinner, H. D. et al. Evaluation of hyperpolarized [1-(1)(3)C]-pyruvate by magnetic resonance to detect ionizing radiation effects in real time. PLoS ONE 9, e87031 (2014).
Kim, S., Park, Y. W., Schiff, B. A., Doan, D. D., Yazici, Y., Jasser, S. A. et al. An orthotopic model of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in athymic nude mice. Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 1713–1721 (2005).
Ahn, S. H., Henderson, Y., Kang, Y., Chattopadhyay, C., Holton, P., Wang, M. et al. An orthotopic model of papillary thyroid carcinoma in athymic nude mice. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 134, 190–197 (2008).
Sano, D., Xie, T. X., Ow, T. J., Zhao, M., Pickering, C. R., Zhou, G. et al. Disruptive TP53 mutation is associated with aggressive disease characteristics in an orthotopic murine model of oral tongue cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 6658–6670 (2011).
Green, A. S., Chapuis, N., Lacombe, C., Mayeux, P., Bouscary, D. & Tamburini, J. LKB1/AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway in hematological malignancies: from metabolism to cancer cell biology. Cell Cycle 10, 2115–2120 (2011).
Shackelford, D. B. & Shaw, R. J. The LKB1–AMPK pathway: metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 563–575 (2009).
Li, N., Huang, D., Lu, N. & Luo, L. Role of the LKB1/AMPK pathway in tumor invasion and metastasis of cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 34, 2821–2826 (2015).
Filipp, F. V. Cancer metabolism meets systems biology: pyruvate kinase isoform PKM2 is a metabolic master regulator. J. Carcinogen. 12, 14. https://doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.115423 (2013).
Reitman, Z. J. & Yan, H. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations in cancer: alterations at a crossroads of cellular metabolism. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 102, 932–941 (2010).
Kroemer, G. & Pouyssegur, J. Tumor cell metabolism: cancer’s Achilles’ heel. Cancer cell 13, 472–482 (2008).
Vander Heiden, M. G. Targeting cancer metabolism: a therapeutic window opens. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 671–684 (2011).
Akhenblit, P. J. & Pagel, M. D. Recent advances in targeting tumor energy metabolism with tumor acidosis as a biomarker of drug efficacy. J. Cancer Sci. Ther. 8, 20 (2016).
Fiume, L., Manerba, M., Vettraino, M. & Di Stefano, G. Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase activity as an approach to cancer therapy. Fut. Med. Chem. 6, 429–445 (2014).
Granchi, C., Bertini, S., Macchia, M. & Minutolo, F. Inhibitors of lactate dehydrogenase isoforms and their therapeutic potentials. Curr. Med. Chem. 17, 672–697 (2010).
Grimm, M., Alexander, D., Munz, A., Hoffmann, J. & Reinert, S. Increased LDH5 expression is associated with lymph node metastasis and outcome in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 30, 529–540 (2013).
Kolev, Y., Uetake, H., Takagi, Y. & Sugihara, K. Lactate dehydrogenase-5 (LDH-5) expression in human gastric cancer: association with hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1alpha) pathway, angiogenic factors production and poor prognosis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 15, 2336–2344 (2008).
Semenza, G. L., Jiang, B. H., Leung, S. W., Passantino, R., Concordet, J. P., Maire, P. et al. Hypoxia response elements in the aldolase A, enolase 1, and lactate dehydrogenase A gene promoters contain essential binding sites for hypoxia-inducible factor 1. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32529–32537 (1996).
Koukourakis, M. I., Giatromanolaki, A., Sivridis, E., Gatter, K. C., Trarbach, T., Folprecht, G. et al. Prognostic and predictive role of lactate dehydrogenase 5 expression in colorectal cancer patients treated with PTK787/ZK 222584 (vatalanib) antiangiogenic therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 4892–4900 (2011).
Koukourakis, M. I., Giatromanolaki, A., Panteliadou, M., Pouliliou, S. E., Chondrou, P. S., Mavropoulou, S. et al. Lactate dehydrogenase 5 isoenzyme overexpression defines resistance of prostate cancer to radiotherapy. Br. J. Cancer 110, 2217–2223 (2014).
Xie, H., Hanai, J., Ren, J. G., Kats, L., Burgess, K., Bhargava, P. et al. Targeting lactate dehydrogenase-a inhibits tumorigenesis and tumor progression in mouse models of lung cancer and impacts tumor-initiating cells. Cell Metab. 19, 795–809 (2014).
Sheng, S. L., Liu, J. J., Dai, Y. H., Sun, X. G., Xiong, X. P. & Huang, G. Knockdown of lactate dehydrogenase A suppresses tumor growth and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. FEBS J. 279, 3898–3910 (2012).
Chang, C. C., Zhang, C., Zhang, Q., Sahin, O., Wang, H., Xu, J. et al. Upregulation of lactate dehydrogenase a by 14-3-3zeta leads to increased glycolysis critical for breast cancer initiation and progression. Oncotarget 7, 35270–35283 (2016).
Lewis, B. C., Prescott, J. E., Campbell, S. E., Shim, H., Orlowski, R. Z. & Dang, C. V. Tumor induction by the c-Myc target genes rcl and lactate dehydrogenase A. Cancer Res. 60, 6178–6183 (2000).
Merkle, S., Favor, J., Graw, J., Hornhardt, S. & Pretsch, W. Hereditary lactate dehydrogenase A-subunit deficiency as cause of early postimplantation death of homozygotes in Mus musculus. Genetics 131, 413–421 (1992).
Iriki, H., Kawata, T. & Muramoto, T. Generation of deletions and precise point mutations in Dictyostelium discoideum using the CRISPR nickase. PLoS ONE 14, e0224128 (2019).
Wang, X., Xu, L., Wu, Q., Liu, M., Tang, F., Cai, Y. et al. Inhibition of LDHA deliver potential anticancer performance in renal cell carcinoma. Urol. Int. 99, 237–244 (2017).
Ahler, E., Sullivan, W. J., Cass, A., Braas, D., York, A. G., Bensinger, S. J. et al. Doxycycline alters metabolism and proliferation of human cell lines. PLoS ONE 8, e64561 (2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.Y.L., V.C.S. and Y.C. designed the study. Y.C., A.M., L.T., M.C., X.L., J.S.N., K.A.M., C.J.H., W.L., Y.C.H. and A.S.R.M. performed the experiments and analysed data; S.Y.L., V.C.S., P.L.L., N.P. and J.A.B. analysed data and provided resources. S.Y.L., V.C.S. and Y.C. wrote the initial draft of the paper. A.M., A.S.M., P.L.L., N.P. and J.A.B. reviewed and revised the draft of the paper. J.A.B., V.C.S. and S.Y.L. provided funding support for this study. S.Y.L. supervised the study. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
For the animal study, all procedures and care were reviewed and approved by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee under Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding information
The work in this study was funded in part, and V.C.S., S.Y.L., J.A.B., Y.C. and J.S.N. were supported by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) grant RP170366. V.C.S. is supported by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research through R03DE028858. J.A.B. is supported by R01CA211150. N.P. is supported by the CPRIT Proteomics and Metabolomics Core Facility (RP170005), NIH (P30 CA125123) and Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center. L.T. and P.L.L. were supported by CPRIT grant RP130397 and NIH grants S10OD012304-01, U01CA235510 and P30CA016672. Work performed in the Flow Cytometry and Cellular Imaging Facility is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health through MD Anderson’s Cancer Center Support grant CA016672. Work performed through the Mouse Metabolism and Phenotyping Core (Seahorse) is supported by NIH UM1HG006348 and NIH R01DK114356. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of their sponsors.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Maniakas, A., Tan, L. et al. Development of a rational strategy for integration of lactate dehydrogenase A suppression into therapeutic algorithms for head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer 124, 1670–1679 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01297-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01297-x