Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Racial differences in prostate cancer: does timing of puberty play a role?

Abstract

The burden of prostate cancer has a remarkably disproportionate distribution across racial groups. For example, in the USA, African Americans are twice as likely as individuals of European ancestry to develop or die from prostate cancer, and have a more aggressive disease nature at diagnosis. In contrast, Asian American men have the lowest incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer. That considerable racial disparities exist even in the subclinical stage of prostate cancer among young men in their 20–30s suggests that patterns of prostate carcinogenesis start to diverge even earlier, perhaps during puberty, when the prostate matures at its most rapid rate. Mendelian randomisation studies have provided strong population-based evidence supporting the hypothesis that earlier onset of puberty increases the risk of prostate cancer—particularly of high grade—and prostate cancer-specific mortality later in life, observations which correspond to the epidemiology of the disease in African Americans. Notably, African American boys initiate genital development ~1 year earlier and thus go through longer periods of pubertal maturation compared with European American boys. In this perspective, bringing together existing evidence, we point to puberty as a potential critical window of increased susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis that could account for the marked prevailing racial differences in the burden of prostate cancer.

Background

A considerable racial disparity in the incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer is a well-recognised public health concern. In the USA, for example, African Americans have the highest incidence and mortality rates, approximately twice as high as those of European American men and even three or four times higher than those of Asian Americans (Table 1).1 Moreover, prostate cancers diagnosed in African Americans tend to be of a more aggressive nature than those of European Americans; and African American men are more likely to have advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis.2 Similar high incidence and mortality rates are also seen in men of African descent in areas other than the USA, such as Jamaica.3,4 Extensive speculation exists regarding potential reasons for this disparity, including genetic factors, socioeconomic status and environmental factors, among others. Differences in the availability of screening programmes and access to healthcare might also contribute in part to the discrepancy, but cannot account for the 2-fold increase in incidence and mortality rates.5 Relatively few risk factors are established for prostate cancer and, to date, no obvious risk factor appears to account for these racial differences.

Table 1 Racial difference in incidence and mortality rates for prostate cancer in the USA, 2012–2017a,b.

A distinctive feature of the epidemiology of these racial differences in incidence and mortality rates is that whatever accounts for them tends to occur earlier in life, such that African American men tend to have an earlier onset of prostate cancer6 as well as being at higher risk of the disease. Even in the case of undiagnosed prostate cancer detected by histology at autopsy, this disparity is consistently observed across ages and is particularly strong at younger ages (i.e. 20–39 years),7 indicating an earlier onset of prostate carcinogenesis in African Americans. Amidst the dearth of compelling modifiable risk factors for prostate cancer, growing evidence points to the importance of aetiological factors early in life, when the immature and growing prostate could be more susceptible to carcinogenic exposures.8,9 Putting together what we know so far, we hypothesise that the earlier onset of puberty in males could be a risk factor for prostate carcinogenesis and potentially account for the observed racial disparities in the disease burden.

The onset of puberty, and factors that influence it

Puberty is an important milestone, representing the transition from childhood to adulthood and the achievement of reproductive capability. Puberty commences with reactivation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, which has been largely dormant since shortly after birth. Although the underlying mechanisms that regulate pubertal onset remain to be completely delineated—particularly in males—there seems to be substantial overlap in the underlying biology between the timing of male and female pubertal development, including common genetic determinants.10,11

Boys progress through puberty in the sequence of genital development, pubic hair growth and peak height velocity.12 Facial hair growth and voice deepening usually take place around the time when pubertal growth spurt begins.13 Testicular enlargement and changes in the colour and texture of the scrotal skin, indicated by Tanner stage 2 of genital development, have been considered to be the first sign of pubertal onset in boys, which typically starts between the ages of 10 and 14 (Table 2).14 Pubertal maturation is more difficult to assess in boys than in girls, primarily due to the lack of a salient and thus memorable milestone such as menarche. Visual evaluation of testicular volume is difficult, but can be assessed in clinical settings using an orchidometer; however, the relatively intrusive and subjective nature of assessment can still curtail patient/study participant-friendly and practical use to ascertain and generate data on male pubertal development.

Table 2 Tanner stages for genital development and pubic hair growth in boysa.

Pubertal traits are heritable, and several genes controlling the reproductive axis have been identified.15 Large-scale genomic studies, mostly carried out in females, identified a substantial number of new loci associated with the timing of puberty (i.e. menarche).16 However, these loci could account for only ~7% of the variance in age at menarche, equivalent to ~25% of heritability, which, in turn, might point to the importance of environmental cues interacting with—or possibly overriding—genetic predisposition in determining the onset of puberty.

Regarding environmental factors that influence the timing of puberty, nutrition, socioeconomic status, stress and exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals have been identified as potential candidates.17 Of nutritional factors, evidence has consistently indicated the role of childhood adiposity and protein intake in the onset of puberty.18 Compared with the well-established link in females between body fat and age at menarche, epidemiological findings have been mixed for male pubertal onset.19 Intake of total and animal protein at age of 5–6 years was inversely associated with, whereas that of vegetable protein at age of 3–4 years was positively associated with several pubertal milestones such as ages at voice break in boys, menarche in girls and pubertal growth spurt and peak height velocity in both sexes.20 Within the US population, a positive socioeconomic gradient in age at menarche (that is, a lower socioeconomic status associated with earlier age at menarche) was observed among European American but not in African American girls, and could be possibly attributable to the increasing prevalence of childhood obesity (and, consequently, body fat) among European American girls of low-income families.21

As endocrine-disrupting chemicals have oestrogenic and/or antiandrogenic effects, it has been postulated that exposure to these compounds might disrupt hormonal balance and thus alter timing of puberty; however, in part due to the huge variability in types, dose and window of exposure to a wide array of chemicals, findings have been inconsistent and data are much more limited in boys.22,23 Although these factors may play a role, age of earlier puberty has been lowering dramatically and uniformly in diverse populations beginning from at least 1830,24,25 indicating that nutritional status and related factors have the dominant role.

Psychological anxiety due to absence of a biological father was associated with an earlier timing of puberty in US boys and girls, independent of socioeconomic status.26 A prospective study of US girls also supported the link between absence of a resident biological father and earlier breast development among girls from high-income families and pubic hair growth only among African American girls from high-income families, and this association remained significant when body mass index was taken into account.27 Taken together, this suggests that intervening exposure to these environmental factors might moderate pubertal timing beyond well-recognised factors related to energy homoeostasis, such as childhood overweight and obesity.

Puberty as a potential window of increased susceptibility for prostate carcinogenesis

Puberty is the period of time over the course of a man’s life when the prostate matures most rapidly, more than doubling in volume within 6 months to 1 year.28 During pubertal progression, the immature epithelium of the prostate gland undergoes extensive cell proliferation and differentiation, mainly into basal, luminal secretory and neuroendocrine cells.29,30 Of these cells, the luminal secretory cells share identical immunohistochemical characteristics with prostate carcinoma cells.29 Nearly all (>95–99%) cases of prostate cancer are known to be derived from luminal cells,30 suggesting that puberty, when these cells start to appear, could constitute a particular window of increased susceptibility for prostate carcinogenesis.

Data estimating the doubling times of prostate cancer cells have provided mathematical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the proliferation of prostate tumour cells can start as early as 14 years of age31—around the time of puberty. Although clinical forms of prostate cancer manifest later in adulthood, histological prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer can be detected at autopsy as early as the third decade of life,7 consistent with the causative factors occurring very early in life, perhaps at puberty. Thus, various lines of data based on the timing of key pathological events converge to indicate that puberty might be a critical time for the initiation of prostate cancers.

Why puberty is a particularly significant period of susceptibility for prostate cancer, however, is not entirely clear from a mechanistic basis. Notably, the onset of puberty initiates dramatic changes in the hormonal milieu, with circulating levels of androgens and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) being elevated to regulate normal somatic growth and sexual maturation. A longitudinal study demonstrated a strong correlation between age at peak velocity for the rise in serum IGF-1 levels and pubertal characteristics in boys such as age at peak height velocity (r = 0.92) and Tanner stages for genital development and pubic hair growth (r = 0.77).32 In addition, a greater, prepubertal IGF-1 level at age of 10 years was associated with an earlier onset of puberty.32 Based on annual evaluations of endocrine profile over the course of the pubertal transition, compared with their European American peers, African American boys had higher levels of IGF-1 during the prepubertal period and lower concentrations of its binding protein (IGFBP)-1 and IGFBP-3 throughout puberty, indicating higher levels of bioavailable IGF-1 in African American boys during puberty.33

In turn, accumulating evidence consistently points to a cancer-enhancing effect of IGF-1, a major growth-regulating hormone and an inhibitor of apoptosis, on the prostate.34 A large pooled meta-analysis of individual participant data from 17 prospective and two cross-sectional studies, including up to 10,554 prostate cancer cases and 13,618 controls, demonstrated a clear association between circulating IGF-1 levels and the risk of prostate cancer, especially for individuals diagnosed before the age of 60 years.35 Earlier onset of puberty was associated with a greater serum level of IGF-1 in men in their 60s, suggesting the biological programming of the IGF-1 system might plausibly take place during puberty, although the precise mechanism for this remains to be elucidated.36 In the middle-aged, US male population, individuals of African ancestry had the lowest IGFBP-3 level, followed by those of European and Asian ancestries, which coincide with the well-known racial disparity in the incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer.37 Notably, high IGF-1 levels and low IGFBP-3 levels, less consistently for the latter, have been associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer, particularly of a more advanced stage.38,39 Identification of genetic variants in IGF-1 associated with prostate cancer risk in multi-ethnic populations also lends support to the potential, important role of IGF-1 in prostate carcinogenesis.40

Epidemiological evidence that links onset of puberty and risk of prostate cancer

From a biological perspective, as has just been described, puberty provides a potential window of susceptibility for prostate cancer. An obvious question, therefore, is whether there is an association between the timing of male puberty and the risk of developing prostate cancer later in life? A well-accepted, analogous example in females is the association between earlier age at menarche and increased risk of breast cancer.41,42,43 However, in part due to the lack of such a landmark pubertal milestone in boys, there is limited evidence regarding male pubertal characteristics that might be associated with health consequences later in life, particularly prostate cancer. Minimal research, mostly from case-control studies, has used other characteristics (e.g. ages at first sexual intercourse, shaving and voice break) that have been considered a proxy for the onset of male pubertal maturation to implicate a protective effect of later puberty on the risk of prostate cancer, but the findings have been largely inconsistent and possibly prone to recall bias.44,45,46,47,48

The results of a study carried out in 201649 provide strong support for an association between the timing of puberty and the risk of developing prostate cancer later in life. Specifically, the evidence was derived from a Mendelian randomisation study using a genetic score combining 13 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with male Tanner stages—with a higher score indicating later onset of puberty—in relation to prostate cancer risk.49 The association of this score with prostate cancer risk, stage and grade was examined in the UK-based ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) case-control study (n = 2927), and the PRACTICAL (PRostate cancer AssoCiation group To Investigate Cancer-Associated aLterations in the genome) consortium (n = 43,737) was used as a replication sample. In ProtecT, the puberty genetic score was inversely associated with prostate cancer grade (odds ratio [OR] of high- versus low-grade cancer, per tertile of the score: 0.76; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.64–0.89). In an instrumental variable estimation of the causal OR, boys with later pubertal maturation (equivalent to a difference in one Tanner stage between peers of the same age) had 77% (95% CI: 43–91%) decreased odds of high Gleason grade prostate cancer. In the PRACTICAL consortium, a 38% (95% CI: 22–51%) lower risk of 15-year prostate cancer-specific mortality was observed per unit difference in Tanner stage at the same age. Assuming an equivalent per-year effect between genetic variants associated with age at menarche in girls and age at voice break in boys,11 another Mendelian randomisation analysis that used the 1000 Genomes Project-imputed genotype data of 329,345 women also supported a protective effect of a later pubertal onset on the prostate cancer risk (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88–0.98), independent of body mass index.16

Mendelian randomisation exploits genetic variants as a proxy to an exposure or a risk factor of interest. Presumably, as genetic variants are less prone to biases such as confounding and reverse causation, this approach helps to derive a strong, causal inference with an outcome of interest.50 The findings from both Mendelian randomisation analyses showed no indication of directional pleiotropy, suggesting that the genetic variants were unlikely to influence the outcome (i.e. prostate cancer) via pathways other than the exposure (i.e. puberty) and thus the overall causal estimate was unlikely to be biased. The large size of these studies and robust findings confirm that the timing of pubertal onset is a strong risk factor for prostate cancer.

Racial differences in the timing of puberty among US boys

If an earlier onset of puberty increases the risk of prostate cancer, does the timing of puberty differ by racial status such that an earlier onset of puberty in African Americans could account for the higher incidence and mortality rates observed? In the USA, racial differences in the timing of puberty, as assessed by Tanner stages, have indeed been observed among boys, as in girls.51,52,53 In one large study, practitioners collected data on Tanner stage and testicular volume among 4131 boys seen for well-child care in 144 paediatric offices across the USA.51 Compared with their European American peers, African American boys had an ~1-year earlier onset of genital development and pubic hair growth, as assessed by Tanner stage.51 The median age, however, for achieving the fully matured stage was comparable between the two sets, indicating that African American boys undergo pubertal maturation with an earlier onset but over a longer duration; such results were also consistently observed in a multicentre, longitudinal study of annual pubertal examinations.52

Whether Asian American boys who have the lowest prostate cancer risk mature later than their African American peers remains to be investigated; however, this pattern was observed for the pubertal timing of US girls. In a multi-ethnic prospective cohort study, African American girls had the earliest onset of breast development—the first sign of pubertal maturation in girls—followed by their peers of Hispanic, European and Asian ancestries,54 as well as a largely similar pattern for menarche.55 Considering the substantial overlap in the underlying biology between the timing of male and female pubertal development,10,11 this might be the likely pattern that exists for the racial differences in the timing of puberty between African and Asian American boys.

As noted above, the onset of puberty initiates dramatic changes in the circulating levels of androgens and IGF-1, which might contribute to prostate carcinogenesis.34 Of potential relevance, compared with their European American peers, African American boys had higher levels of IGF-1 during the prepubertal period and lower concentrations of its binding proteins throughout puberty, suggesting potential racial disparities in the IGF-1 system during this critical time period of prostate development.33 Thus, evidence demonstrates that African Americans have a notably earlier onset and longer duration of puberty along with hormonal changes that might be relevant for an increased risk of prostate cancer later in life.

Earlier onset of puberty as an explanation for the higher rates of aggressive prostate cancer in African Americans

Bringing together all the relevant evidence, we hypothesise that an earlier onset of puberty could increase the risk of developing aggressive forms of prostate cancer later in life, for which there are marked racial differences in the USA (Fig. 1). The results from the Mendelian randomisation studies provide strong genetic evidence that an earlier onset of puberty causally increases the risk of prostate cancer—in particular, aggressive forms—and prostate cancer-specific mortality.16,49 Moreover, the magnitude of the association, as indicated by the genetic variants, is strong. The second key piece of evidence is that African American boys show a substantially earlier onset of genital development than European American peers.51,52 If we assume a causal relationship between the actual onset of puberty and the risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer, we would anticipate higher rates of aggressive and fatal prostate cancer in African Americans. Furthermore, these racial differences would be pronounced, occurring at the earliest ages when prostate cancer becomes clinically apparent, such as by the fifth or sixth decades of life. These are precisely the patterns we observe for racial disparities in the epidemiology of prostate cancer in the USA. In conjunction with the earlier onset and longer duration of pubertal maturation observed in African Americans, exposure to high levels of IGF-1 and low levels of IGFBP-3, which have been speculated to facilitate tumour invasion and metastases,39,56 during a critical window of prostate development could increase susceptibility to prostatic neoplasia, particularly of a more aggressive nature, leaving lasting, long-term effects on the prostate, and thus possibly account for the well-known racial differences in the burden of prostate cancer.

Fig. 1: Puberty as a potential window of susceptibility for prostate cancer development.
figure 1

Abbreviations: A Asian; AA African American; EA European American, IGF-1 insulin-like growth factor-1.

Recommendations for future research and public health implications

Puberty is a remarkable life event of public health importance, yet it is largely overlooked in cancer research. Given the complicated and less understood nature of puberty—particularly in males—longitudinal monitoring with a standardised measure across nationally representative, multi-ethnic groups should help to characterise the key features of male puberty across different racial groups. Given the lack of a salient pubertal milestone in boys, derivation of a composite measure from multiple pubertal characteristics might help to better represent male puberty.48 Epidemiological or experimental studies elucidating the underlying biological mechanisms between the timing of puberty and the risk of developing prostate cancer are recommended. Considering the plausible role of IGF-1 in prostate carcinogenesis and a strong link between IGF-1 and diabetes,57 future studies could decipher the association between pubertal timing and risk of diabetes and prostate cancer. Identification of strong instrumental variables for the timing of puberty and implementation of a Mendelian randomisation study in the African American population would contribute to generating strong, causal evidence on the potential link between puberty and prostate cancer. A better understanding of the factors that influence the onset of puberty is also important, although altering the timing of pubertal onset will be difficult to achieve from a practical perspective. Nonetheless, if puberty is a critical time period during which the risk of prostate cancer starts to diverge, complementary approaches that modify factors that are associated with early puberty, such as diet and physical activity, could be taken. For example, research suggests that diet during adolescence might have a role in the prevention of breast cancer.58,59 Besides nutritional influences, other factors that might influence the plasticity of the timing of puberty, such as psychological anxiety or stress, could be other relevant targets for intervention.

We hypothesise that the earlier onset of puberty could increase the risk of prostate cancer, particularly of a more aggressive nature, later in life, and could therefore account for the well-known, substantial racial differences in the burden of prostate cancer in the USA. This hypothesis does not imply that other factors do not in some way contribute to the differences—for example, how access to care and treatment might affect clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, as summarised above, evidence suggests that some of the apparent racial disparities are likely to occur early in life, well before the influences of screening and treatments. More research is needed to corroborate our hypothesis, but the overall coherence of evidence helps to assure its plausibility. Ongoing research on the topic could help provide aetiologic clues to the racial disparity in morbidity and mortality of prostate cancer, and in the developmental origins of prostate cancer in general. It could further guide primary prevention and intervention strategies that convert the window of susceptibility during puberty into an opportunity for future investment in better health outcomes and well-being of the population.

References

  1. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 70, 7–30 (2020).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chornokur, G., Dalton, K., Borysova, M. E. & Kumar, N. B. Disparities at presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and survival in African American men, affected by prostate cancer. Prostate 71, 985–997 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morrison, B. F., Aiken, W. D. & Mayhew, R. Current state of prostate cancer treatment in Jamaica. Ecancermedicalscience 8, 456 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Morrison, B. F., Aiken, W. D., Mayhew, R., Gordon, Y. & Odedina, F. T. Prostate cancer knowledge, prevention, and screening behaviors in Jamaican men. J. Cancer Educ. 32, 352–356 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffman, R. M., Gilliland, F. D., Eley, J. W., Harlan, L. C., Stephenson, R. A., Stanford, J. L. et al. Racial and ethnic differences in advanced-stage prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 93, 388–395 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Howlader, N., Noone, A. M., Krapcho, M., Miller, D., Brest, A., Yu, M. et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2016. (National Cancer Institute, 2019).

  7. Jahn, J. L., Giovannucci, E. L. & Stampfer, M. J. The high prevalence of undiagnosed prostate cancer at autopsy: implications for epidemiology and treatment of prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen-era. Int J. Cancer 137, 2795–2802 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sutcliffe, S. & Colditz, G. A. Prostate cancer: is it time to expand the research focus to early-life exposures? Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 208–518 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke, M. A. & Joshu, C. E. Early life exposures and adult cancer risk. Epidemiol. Rev. 39, 11–27 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cousminer, D. L., Stergiakouli, E., Berry, D. J., Ang, W., Groen-Blokhuis, M. M., Korner, A. et al. Genome-wide association study of sexual maturation in males and females highlights a role for body mass and menarche loci in male puberty. Hum. Mol. Genet 23, 4452–4464 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Day, F. R., Bulik-Sullivan, B., Hinds, D. A., Finucane, H. K., Murabito, J. M., Tung, J. Y. et al. Shared genetic aetiology of puberty timing between sexes and with health-related outcomes. Nat. Commun. 6, 8842 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanner, J. M. Foetus into man: physical growth from conception to maturity. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1990) .

  13. Spear, B. A. Adolescent growth and development. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 102, S23–S29 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marshall, W. A. & Tanner, J. M. Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Arch. Dis. Child 45, 13–23 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abreu, A. P. & Kaiser, U. B. Pubertal development and regulation. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 4, 254–264 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Day, F. R., Thompson, D. J., Helgason, H., Chasman, D. I., Finucane, H., Sulem, P. et al. Genomic analyses identify hundreds of variants associated with age at menarche and support a role for puberty timing in cancer risk. Nat. Genet 49, 834–841 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parent, A. S., Teilmann, G., Juul, A., Skakkebaek, N. E., Toppari, J. & Bourguignon, J. P. The timing of normal puberty and the age limits of sexual precocity: variations around the world, secular trends, and changes after migration. Endocr. Rev. 24, 668–693 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Villamor, E. & Jansen, E. C. Nutritional determinants of the timing of puberty. Annu Rev. Public Health 37, 33–46 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, J. M., Wasserman, R., Kaciroti, N., Gebremariam, A., Steffes, J., Dowshen, S. et al. Timing of puberty in overweight versus obese boys. Pediatrics 137, e20150164 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gunther, A. L., Karaolis-Danckert, N., Kroke, A., Remer, T. & Buyken, A. E. Dietary protein intake throughout childhood is associated with the timing of puberty. J. Nutr. 140, 565–571 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Krieger, N., Kiang, M. V., Kosheleva, A., Waterman, P. D., Chen, J. T. & Beckfield, J. Age at menarche: 50-year socioeconomic trends among US-born black and white women. Am. J. Public Health 105, 388–397 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mouritsen, A., Aksglaede, L., Sorensen, K., Mogensen, S. S., Leffers, H., Main, K. M. et al. Hypothesis: exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals may interfere with timing of puberty. Int J. Androl. 33, 346–359 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Burns, J. S., Lee, M. M., Williams, P. L., Korrick, S. A., Sergeyev, O., Lam, T. et al. Associations of peripubertal serum dioxin and polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations with pubertal timing among Russian boys. Environ. Health Perspect. 124, 1801–1807 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wyshak, G. & Frisch, R. E. Evidence for a secular trend in age of menarche. N. Engl. J. Med. 306, 1033–1035 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Meng, X., Li, S., Duan, W., Sun, Y. & Jia, C. Secular trend of age at menarche in Chinese adolescents born from 1973 to 2004. Pediatrics 140, e20170085 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bogaert, A. F. Age at puberty and father absence in a national probability sample. J. Adolesc. 28, 541–546 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Deardorff, J., Ekwaru, J. P., Kushi, L. H., Ellis, B. J., Greenspan, L. C., Mirabedi, A. et al. Father absence, body mass index, and pubertal timing in girls: differential effects by family income and ethnicity. J. Adolesc. Health 48, 441–447 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Swyer, G. I. Post-natal growth changes in the human prostate. J. Anat. 78, 130–145 (1944).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wernert, N., Seitz, G. & Achtstatter, T. Immunohistochemical investigation of different cytokeratins and vimentin in the prostate from the fetal period up to adulthood and in prostate carcinoma. Pathol. Res Pract. 182, 617–626 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kasper, S. Exploring the origins of the normal prostate and prostate cancer stem cell. Stem Cell Rev. 4, 193–201 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Diamandis, E. P. & Yu, H. Does prostate cancer start at puberty? J. Clin. Lab Anal. 10, 468–469 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cole, T. J., Ahmed, M. L., Preece, M. A., Hindmarsh, P. & Dunger, D. B. The relationship between insulin-like growth factor 1, sex steroids and timing of the pubertal growth spurt. Clin. Endocrinol. 82, 862–869 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Casazza, K., Higgins, P. B., Fernandez, J. R., Goran, M. I. & Gower, B. A. Longitudinal analysis of the insulin-like growth factor system in African-American and European American children and adolescents. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 93, 4917–4923 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rowlands, M. A., Gunnell, D., Harris, R., Vatten, L. J., Holly, J. M. & Martin, R. M. Circulating insulin-like growth factor peptides and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J. Cancer 124, 2416–2429 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Travis, R. C., Appleby, P. N., Martin, R. M., Holly, J. M. P., Albanes, D., Black, A. et al. A meta-analysis of individual participant data reveals an association between circulating levels of IGF-I and prostate cancer risk. Cancer Res 76, 2288–2300 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sandhu, J., Davey Smith, G., Holly, J., Cole, T. J. & Ben-Shlomo, Y. Timing of puberty determines serum insulin-like growth factor-I in late adulthood. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 91, 3150–3157 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Platz, E. A., Pollak, M. N., Rimm, E. B., Majeed, N., Tao, Y., Willett, W. C. et al. Racial variation in insulin-like growth factor-1 and binding protein-3 concentrations in middle-aged men. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 8, 1107–1110 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chan, J. M., Stampfer, M. J., Giovannucci, E., Gann, P. H., Ma, J., Wilkinson, P. et al. Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I and prostate cancer risk: a prospective study. Science 279, 563–566 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chan, J. M., Stampfer, M. J., Ma, J., Gann, P., Gaziano, J. M., Pollak, M. et al. Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein-3 as predictors of advanced-stage prostate cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 94, 1099–1106 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheng, I., Stram, D. O., Penney, K. L., Pike, M., Le Marchand, L., Kolonel, L. N. et al. Common genetic variation in IGF1 and prostate cancer risk in the Multiethnic Cohort. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 98, 123–134 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kelsey, J. L., Gammon, M. D. & John, E. M. Reproductive factors and breast cancer. Epidemiol. Rev. 15, 36–47 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol. 13, 1141–1151 (2012).

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bertrand, K. A., Gerlovin, H., Bethea, T. N. & Palmer, J. R. Pubertal growth and adult height in relation to breast cancer risk in African American women. Int J. Cancer 141, 2462–2470 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Honda, G. D., Bernstein, L., Ross, R. K., Greenland, S., Gerkins, V. & Henderson, B. E. Vasectomy, cigarette smoking, and age at first sexual intercourse as risk factors for prostate cancer in middle-aged men. Br. J. Cancer 57, 326–331 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dennis, L. K. & Dawson, D. V. Meta-analysis of measures of sexual activity and prostate cancer. Epidemiology 13, 72–79 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Habel, L. A., Van Den Eeden, S. K. & Friedman, G. D. Body size, age at shaving initiation, and prostate cancer in a large, multiracial cohort. Prostate 43, 136–143 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Barba, M., Terrenato, I., Schunemann, H. J., Fuhrman, B., Sperati, F., Teter, B. et al. Indicators of sexual and somatic development and adolescent body size in relation to prostate cancer risk: results from a case-control study. Urology 72, 183–187 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nair-Shalliker, V., Yap, S., Nunez, C., Egger, S., Rodger, J., Patel, M. I. et al. Adult body size, sexual history and adolescent sexual development, may predict risk of developing prostate cancer: results from the New South Wales Lifestyle and Evaluation of Risk Study (CLEAR). Int J. Cancer 140, 565–574 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bonilla, C., Lewis, S. J., Martin, R. M., Donovan, J. L., Hamdy, F. C., Neal, D. E. et al. Pubertal development and prostate cancer risk: Mendelian randomization study in a population-based cohort. BMC Med 14, 66 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Yarmolinsky, J., Wade, K. H., Richmond, R. C., Langdon, R. J., Bull, C. J., Tilling, K. M. et al. Causal inference in cancer epidemiology: what is the role of Mendelian randomization? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 27, 995–1010 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Herman-Giddens, M. E., Steffes, J., Harris, D., Slora, E., Hussey, M., Dowshen, S. A. et al. Secondary sexual characteristics in boys: data from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings network. Pediatrics 130, e1058–e1068 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Susman, E. J., Houts, R. M., Steinberg, L., Belsky, J., Cauffman, E., Dehart, G. et al. Longitudinal development of secondary sexual characteristics in girls and boys between ages 91/2 and 151/2 years. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 164, 166–173 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lopez, D. S., Peskoe, S. B., Joshu, C. E., Dobs, A., Feinleib, M., Kanarek, N. et al. Racial/ethnic differences in serum sex steroid hormone concentrations in US adolescent males. Cancer Causes Control 24, 817–826 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Biro, F. M., Greenspan, L. C., Galvez, M. P., Pinney, S. M., Teitelbaum, S., Windham, G. C. et al. Onset of breast development in a longitudinal cohort. Pediatrics 132, 1019–1027 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Biro, F. M., Pajak, A., Wolff, M. S., Pinney, S. M., Windham, G. C., Galvez, M. P. et al. Age of menarche in a longitudinal US cohort. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 31, 339–345 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mehta, H. H., Gao, Q., Galet, C., Paharkova, V., Wan, J., Said, J. et al. IGFBP-3 is a metastasis suppression gene in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 71, 5154–5163 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ezzat, V. A., Duncan, E. R., Wheatcroft, S. B. & Kearney, M. T. The role of IGF-I and its binding proteins in the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 10, 198–211 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Farvid, M. S., Cho, E., Chen, W. Y., Eliassen, A. H. & Willett, W. C. Adolescent meat intake and breast cancer risk. Int J. Cancer 136, 1909–1920 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Farvid, M. S., Chen, W. Y., Michels, K. B., Cho, E., Willett, W. C. & Eliassen, A. H. Fruit and vegetable consumption in adolescence and early adulthood and risk of breast cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ 353, i2343 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed to researching data, discussion of content and drafting, reviewing and revising of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jinhee Hur or Edward Giovannucci.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Funding information

None.

Additional information

Note This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hur, J., Giovannucci, E. Racial differences in prostate cancer: does timing of puberty play a role?. Br J Cancer 123, 349–354 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0897-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0897-4

Further reading

Search

Quick links