Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Molecular Diagnostics

The amount of activating EGFR mutations in circulating cell-free DNA is a marker to monitor osimertinib response

Abstract

Background

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) may help understand the molecular response to pharmacologic treatment and provide information on dynamics of clonal heterogeneity. Therefore, this study evaluated the correlation between treatment outcome and activating EGFR mutations (act-EGFR) and T790M in cfDNA in patients with advanced NSCLC given osimertinib.

Methods

Thirty-four NSCLC patients resistant to first/second-generation EGFR-TKIs, positive for both act-EGFR and T790M in cfDNA at the time of progression were enrolled in this study. Plasma samples were obtained at osimertinib baseline and after 3 months of therapy; cfDNA was analyzed by droplet digital PCR and results were expressed as mutant allele frequency (MAF).

Results

At baseline, act-EGFR MAF was significantly higher than T790M (p < 0.0001). act-EGFR MAF and T790M/act-EGFR MAF ratio were significantly correlated with disease response (p = 0.02). Cut-off values of act-EGFR MAF and T790M/act-EGFR ratio of 2.6% and 0.22 were found, respectively. The PFS of patients with act-EGFR MAF of > 2.6% and < 2.6%, were 10 months vs. not reached, respectively (p = 0.03), whereas patients with T790M/act-EGFR ≤ 0.22 had poorer PFS than patients with a value of > 0.22 (6 months vs. not reached, respectively, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

act-EGFR MAF and T790M/act-EGFR MAF ratio are potential markers of outcome in patients treated with osimertinib.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Gazdar, A. F. Activating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer: role in clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncogene 28(Suppl 1), S24–S31 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dixit, A. & Verkhivker, G. M. Hierarchical modeling of activation mechanisms in the ABL and EGFR kinase domains: thermodynamic and mechanistic catalysts of kinase activation by cancer mutations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000487 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin, Y., Wang, X. & Jin, H. EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC patients: mechanisms and strategies. Am. J. Cancer Res. 4, 411–435 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yun, C. H. et al. The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2070–2075 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Janne, P. A. et al. AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 1689–1699 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mok, T. S. et al. Osimertinib or platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-positive lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 629–640 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oxnard, G. R. et al. Association between plasma genotyping and outcomes of treatment with osimertinib (AZD9291) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 3375–3382 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, C., Wei, S. & Song, Y. T790M and acquired resistance of EGFR TKI: a literature review of clinical reports. J. Thorac. Dis. 3, 10–18 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu, H. A., Arcila, M. E., Hellmann, M. D., Kris, M. G., Ladanyi, M. & Riely, G. J. Poor response to erlotinib in patients with tumours containing baseline EGFR T790M mutations found by routine clinical molecular testing. Ann. Oncol. 25, 423–428 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan, D. S. et al. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Consensus statement on optimizing management of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: status in 2016. J. Thorac. Oncol. 11, 946–963 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jovelet, C. et al. Circulating cell-free tumour DNA analysis of 50 genes by next-generation sequencing in the prospective MOSCATO trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 2960–2968 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Del, Re. M. et al. Patients with NSCLC may display a low ratio of p.T790M vs. activating EGFR mutations in plasma at disease progression: implications for personalised treatment. Oncotarget 8, 86056–86065 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Del, Re. M. et al. Contribution of KRAS mutations and c.2369C>T (p.T790M) EGFR to acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs in EGFR mutant NSCLC: a study on circulating tumour DNA. Oncotarget 8, 13611–13619 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seki, Y. et al. Picoliter-droplet digital polymerase chain reaction-based analysis of cell-free plasma DNA to assess EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma that confer resistance to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. Oncologist 21, 156–164 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yi, X., Ma, J., Guan, Y., Chen, R., Yang, L. & Xia, X. The feasibility of using mutation detection in ctDNA to assess tumour dynamics. Int. J. Cancer 140, 2642–2647 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yung, T. K., Chan, K. C., Mok, T. S., Tong, J., To, K. F. & Lo, Y. M. Single-molecule detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in plasma by microfluidics digital PCR in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 2076–2084 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Soria, J. C. et al. Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 113–125 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Remon, J. et al. Osimertinib benefit in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with T790M-mutation detected by circulating tumour DNA. Ann. Oncol. 28, 784–790 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chabon, J. J. et al. Circulating tumour DNA profiling reveals heterogeneity of EGFR inhibitor resistance mechanisms in lung cancer patients. Nat. Commun. 7, 11815 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Piotrowska, Z. et al. Heterogeneity underlies the emergence of EGFRT790 wild-type clones following treatment of T790M-positive cancers with a third-generation EGFR inhibitor. Cancer Discov. 5, 713–722 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thress, K. S. et al. Complete clearance of plasma EGFR mutations as a predictor of outcome on osimertinib in the AURA trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 35(15_suppl), 9018–9018 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chic, N., Mayo-de-Las-Casas, C. & Reguart, N. Successful treatment with gefitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer after acquired resistance to osimertinib. J. Thorac. Oncol. 12, e78–e80 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Knebel, F. H. et al. Sequential liquid biopsies reveal dynamic alterations of EGFR driver mutations and indicate EGFR amplification as a new mechanism of resistance to osimertinib in NSCLC. Lung Cancer 108, 238–241 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ou, S. I. et al. Emergence of novel and dominant acquired EGFR solvent-front mutations at Gly796 (G796S/R) together with C797S/R and L792F/H mutations in one EGFR (L858R/T790M) NSCLC patient who progressed on osimertinib. Lung Cancer 108, 228–231 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ou, S. I., Agarwal, N. & Ali, S. M. High MET amplification level as a resistance mechanism to osimertinib (AZD9291) in a patient that symptomatically responded to crizotinib treatment post-osimertinib progression. Lung Cancer 98, 59–61 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Minari, R. et al. Primary resistance to osimertinib due to SCLC transformation: Issue of T790M determination on liquid re-biopsy. Lung Cancer 115, 21–27 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by research funding granted to Romano Danesi from Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Lucca (Lucca, Italy).

Availability of data and materials

Data and results are available at the Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, University Hospital of Pisa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: M.D.R., M.T., I.P., and R.D. Development of methodology: M.D.R., E.R., G.R., S.C., and E.A. Clinical protocols/amendments: M.D.R., R.D., and M.T. Acquisition of data: M.D.R., P.B., E.R., G.R., S.C., E.A., and R.M. Analysis and interpretation of data: M.D.R., P.B., E.R., I.P., M.T., R.M., and R.D. Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: all authors. Administrative, technical, or material support: M.D.R., P.B., E.R., and R.D. Study supervision: R.D., M.T., and I.P.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iacopo Petrini.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

T.M. received honoraria for participation in advisory boards and speakers’ bureau of Astra-Zeneca. R.D. received a unrestricted research grant from Astra-Zeneca. The other Authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics statement

This work was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Area Vasta Nord Ovest Toscana (Italy) under the reference number 612/2015 and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients were instructed about the experimental procedures of the study and enrolled after signature of the informed consent.

Consent for publication

No individual person’s data are reported.

Note

This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Del Re, M., Bordi, P., Rofi, E. et al. The amount of activating EGFR mutations in circulating cell-free DNA is a marker to monitor osimertinib response. Br J Cancer 119, 1252–1258 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0238-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0238-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links