Abstract

Background

Immune infiltration is implicated in the development of acquired resistance to anti-angiogenic cancer therapy. We therefore investigated the correlation between neutrophil infiltration in metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and survival after treatment with bevacizumab. Our study identifies CD177+ tumour neutrophil infiltration as an adverse prognostic factor for bevacizumab treatment. We further demonstrate that a novel anti-VEGF/anti-Ang2 compound (BI-880) can overcome resistance to VEGF inhibition in experimental tumour models.

Methods

A total of 85 metastatic CRC patients were stratified into cohorts that had either received chemotherapy alone (n = 39) or combined with bevacizumab (n = 46). Tumour CD177+ neutrophil infiltration was correlated to clinical outcome. The impact of neutrophil infiltration on anti-VEGF or anti-VEGF/anti-Ang2 therapy was studied in both xenograft and syngeneic tumour models by immunohistochemistry.

Results

The survival of bevacizumab-treated CRC patients in the presence of CD177+ infiltrates was significantly reduced compared to patients harbouring CD177− metastases. BI-880 treatment reduced the development of hypoxia associated with bevacizumab treatment and improved vascular normalisation in xenografts. Furthermore, neutrophil depletion or BI-880 treatment restored treatment sensitivity in a syngeneic tumour model of anti-VEGF resistance.

Conclusions

Our findings implicate CD177 as a biomarker for bevacizumab and suggest VEGF/Ang2 inhibition as a strategy to overcome neutrophil associated resistance to anti-angiogenic treatment.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Lupo, G. et al. Anti-angiogenic therapy in cancer: downsides and new pivots for precision medicine. Front. Pharmacol. 7, 519 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Bueno, M. J., Mouron, S. & Quintela-Fandino, M. Personalising and targeting antiangiogenic resistance: a complex and multifactorial approach. Br. J. Cancer 116, 1119–1125 (2017).

  3. 3.

    Bottsford-Miller, J. N., Coleman, R. L. & Sood, A. K. Resistance and escape from antiangiogenesis therapy: clinical implications and future strategies. J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 4026–4034 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Gerald, D., Chintharlapalli, S., Augustin, H. G. & Benjamin, L. E. Angiopoietin-2: an attractive target for improved antiangiogenic tumor therapy. Cancer Res. 73, 1649–1657 (2013).

  5. 5.

    Goede, V. et al. Identification of serum angiopoietin-2 as a biomarker for clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab-containing therapy. Br. J. Cancer 103, 1407–1414 (2010).

  6. 6.

    Coutelle, O. et al. Dual targeting of Angiopoetin-2 and VEGF potentiates effective vascular normalisation without inducing empty basement membrane sleeves in xenograft tumours. Br. J. Cancer 112, 495–503 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Chung, A. S. et al. An interleukin-17-mediated paracrine network promotes tumor resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. Nat. Med. 19, 1114–1123 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Coffelt, S. B., Wellenstein, M. D. & de Visser, K. E. Neutrophils in cancer: neutral no more. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 431–446 (2016).

  9. 9.

    De Palma, M. & Lewis, C. E. Macrophage regulation of tumor responses to anticancer therapies. Cancer Cell. 23, 277–286 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Shojaei, F. et al. Tumor refractoriness to anti-VEGF treatment is mediated by CD11b+Gr1+myeloid cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 911–920 (2007).

  11. 11.

    Jung, K. et al. Ly6Clo monocytes drive immunosuppression and confer resistance to anti-VEGFR2 cancer therapy. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 3039–3051 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Huang, H. et al. Specifically targeting angiopoietin-2 inhibits angiogenesis, Tie2-expressing monocyte infiltration, and tumor growth. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 1001–1011 (2011).

  13. 13.

    Mazzieri, R. et al. Targeting the ANG2/TIE2 axis inhibits tumor growth and metastasis by impairing angiogenesis and disabling rebounds of proangiogenic myeloid cells. Cancer Cell. 19, 512–526 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Droeser, R. A. et al. High myeloperoxidase positive cell infiltration in colorectal cancer is an independent favorable prognostic factor. PLoS ONE 8, e64814–10 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Galdiero, M. R. et al. Occurrence and significance of tumor-associated neutrophils in patients with colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer 139, 446–456 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Rao, H.-L. et al. Increased intratumoral neutrophil in colorectal carcinomas correlates closely with malignant phenotype and predicts patients’ adverse prognosis. PLoS ONE 7, e30806 (2012).

  17. 17.

    Bai, M. et al. CD177 modulates human neutrophil migration through activation-mediated integrin and chemoreceptor regulation. Blood 130, 2092–2100 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Coutelle, O. et al. Embelin inhibits endothelial mitochondrial respiration and impairs neoangiogenesis during tumor growth and wound healing. EMBO Mol. Med. 6, 624–639 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Schiffmann, L. M. et al. A combination of low-dose bevacizumab and imatinib enhances vascular normalisation without inducing extracellular matrix deposition. Br. J. Cancer 116, 600–608 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Sennino, B. et al. Sequential loss of tumor vessel pericytes and endothelial cells after inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor B by selective aptamer AX102. Cancer Res. 67, 7358–7367 (2007).

  21. 21.

    Helbig, D. et al. Oncogene and therapeutic target analyses in atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas. Oncotarget 7, 21763–21774 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Sceneay, J. et al. Primary tumor hypoxia recruits CD11b+/Ly6Cmed/Ly6G+immune suppressor cells and compromises NK cell cytotoxicity in the premetastatic niche. Cancer Res. 72, 3906–3911 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Jain, R. K. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 307, 58–62 (2005).

  24. 24.

    Fujii, T. et al. Process of distant lymph node metastasis in colorectal carcinoma: implication of extracapsular invasion of lymph node metastasis. BMC Cancer 11, 216 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Powell, D. R. & Huttenlocher, A. Neutrophils in the tumor microenvironment. Trends Immunol. 37, 41–52 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Coffelt, S. B. et al. IL-17-producing γδ T cells and neutrophils conspire to promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature 522, 345–348 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Hashizume, H. et al. Complementary actions of inhibitors of angiopoietin-2 and VEGF on tumor angiogenesis and growth. Cancer Res. 70, 2213–2223 (2010).

  28. 28.

    Peterson, T. E. et al. Dual inhibition of Ang-2 and VEGF receptors normalizes tumor vasculature and prolongs survival in glioblastoma by altering macrophages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4470–4475 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Reardon, D. A. et al. Phase 2 and biomarker study of trebananib, an angiopoietin-blocking peptibody, with and without bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Cancer 124, 1438–1448 (2018).

  30. 30.

    Thurston, G. & Daly, C. The complex role of angiopoietin-2 in the angiopoietin-tie signaling pathway. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a006650 (2012).

  31. 31.

    Bais, C. et al. Tumor microvessel density as a potential predictive marker for bevacizumab benefit: GOG-0218 biomarker analyses. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 109, 385 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Stroncek, D. F., Caruccio, L. & Bettinotti, M. CD177: a member of the Ly-6 gene superfamily involved with neutrophil proliferation and polycythemia vera. J. Transl. Med. 2, 8 (2004).

  33. 33.

    Chua, W., Charles, K. A., Baracos, V. E. & Clarke, S. J. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 104, 1288–1295 (2011).

  34. 34.

    Passardi, A. et al. Inflammatory indexes as predictors of prognosis and bevacizumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 7, 33210–33219 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ali Manav for great technical assistance.

Author contributions

Study design: L.M.S., H.K., O.C. providing of study materials or samples: L.M.S., H.K., O.C., F.G., G.D., M.B., H.A., H.G., A.Q., T.Z., F.H., C.J.B., J.M.S. data generation, analysis and interpretation: L.M.S., H.K., O.C., M.F., F.G., S.D.G., N.R.S., F.T., A.Q., H.G. manuscript writing: all authors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Hamid Kashkar, Oliver Coutelle.

Affiliations

  1. Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC) and Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, CECAD Research Center, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 26, 50931, Cologne, Germany

    • Lars Mortimer Schiffmann
    • , Melanie Fritsch
    • , Saskia Diana Günther
    • , Neil Richard Stair
    • , Jens Michael Seeger
    • , Hamid Kashkar
    •  & Oliver Coutelle
  2. Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany

    • Lars Mortimer Schiffmann
    • , Florian Gebauer
    • , Georg Dieplinger
    • , Marc Bludau
    • , Hakan Alakus
    •  & Christiane Josephine Bruns
  3. Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Cologne Bonn, Gastrointestinal Cancer Group Cologne (GCGC), Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany

    • Lars Mortimer Schiffmann
    • , Florian Gebauer
    • , Georg Dieplinger
    • , Marc Bludau
    • , Hakan Alakus
    • , Heike Göbel
    • , Alexander Quaas
    • , Thomas Zander
    • , Christiane Josephine Bruns
    •  & Hamid Kashkar
  4. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany

    • Fabinshy Thangarajah
  5. Institute for Pathology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany

    • Heike Göbel
    •  & Alexander Quaas
  6. Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany

    • Thomas Zander
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim RCV, Doktor-Boehringer-Gasse 5-11, 1120, Vienna, Austria

    • Frank Hilberg

Authors

  1. Search for Lars Mortimer Schiffmann in:

  2. Search for Melanie Fritsch in:

  3. Search for Florian Gebauer in:

  4. Search for Saskia Diana Günther in:

  5. Search for Neil Richard Stair in:

  6. Search for Jens Michael Seeger in:

  7. Search for Fabinshy Thangarajah in:

  8. Search for Georg Dieplinger in:

  9. Search for Marc Bludau in:

  10. Search for Hakan Alakus in:

  11. Search for Heike Göbel in:

  12. Search for Alexander Quaas in:

  13. Search for Thomas Zander in:

  14. Search for Frank Hilberg in:

  15. Search for Christiane Josephine Bruns in:

  16. Search for Hamid Kashkar in:

  17. Search for Oliver Coutelle in:

Ethical approval:

The study was performed in agreement with the local research ethics guidelines (ethics committee medical faculty, University of Cologne). Human samples were collected at the University Hospital of Cologne with written informed consent from patients with colorectal cancer concurring with the Declaration of Helsinki. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the German animal protection law as approved by local government authorities.

Competing interests:

The authors declare no competing interests.

Note

This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Availability of data and material:

Datasets generated and analysed for this work are not publicly available and but are accessible upon request.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Mortimer Schiffmann.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0198-3