Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research
  • Published:

Is nasopalatine nerve block still mandated for the extraction of maxillary anterior teeth?

Abstract

Aim This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single labial injection of 4% articaine for the extraction of maxillary anterior teeth without the need for nasopalatine supplementary injection.

Materials and methods A prospective, controlled, split-mouth clinical study was performed to evaluate the clinical performance of 4% articaine as a single labial infiltration anaesthesia for the extraction of maxillary anterior teeth and to compare it with the routine method of labial injection along with a supplementary nasopalatine injection using 2% lidocaine. Statistical analyses were performed, with the statistical significance being set at 5% level.

Results A total of 37 patients met the inclusion criteria, and a statistically significant difference was observed in the reported pain during injection between the single labial articaine injection and the routine labial and palatal lidocaine injections (P <0.001). The extraction of maxillary anterior teeth was possible without the need for an additional nasopalatine injection in all the study patients (n = 37). The difference between both groups was statistically non-significant in terms of the pain encountered during extraction (P = 0.22).

Conclusion With the use of 4% articaine as a single labial infiltration anaesthesia, nasopalatine nerve block for the extraction of maxillary anterior teeth may become an outdated modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prabhu S, Faizel S, Pahlajani V et al. Making nasopalatine blocks comfortable: A randomized prospective clinical comparison of pain associated with the injection using an insulin syringe and a standard disposable 3 mL syringe. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2012; 12: 436-439.

  2. Badenoch-Jones E K, Lincoln T. Palatal injection for removal of maxillary teeth: is it required? A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45: 1283-1292.

  3. Malamed S F. Handbook of Local Anaesthesia. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2012.

  4. Aslin W R. Reduced discomfort during palatal injection. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 1277.

  5. Kandasamy S, Elangovan R, John R R et al. Removal of maxillary teeth with buccal 4% Articaine without using palatal anaesthesia - A comparative double blind study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol 2015; 27: 154-158.

  6. Meechan J G, Howlett P C, Smith B D. Factors influencing the discomfort of intraoral needle penetration. Anesth Prog 2005; 52: 91-94.

  7. Malamed S F, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anaesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 635-642.

  8. Malamed S F, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anaesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 177-185.

  9. Brandt R G, Anderson P F, McDonald N J et al. The pulpal anaesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in dentistry: a meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142: 493-504.

  10. Ogle O E, Mahjoubi G. Advances in local anaesthesia in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2011; 55: 481-499.

  11. Uckan S, Dayangac E, Araz K. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 733-735.

  12. Fan S, Chen W L, Yang Z H et al. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 359-363.

  13. Sharma K, Sharma A, Aseri M et al. Maxillary posterior teeth removal without palatal injectiontruth or myth: a dilemma for oral surgeons. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10378.5092.

  14. Bataineh A B, Al-Sabri G A. Extraction of maxillary teeth using articaine without a palatal injection: a comparison between the anterior and posterior regions of the maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 75: 87-91.

  15. Badcock M E, Gordon I, McCullough M J. A blinded randomized controlled trial comparing lignocaine and placebo administration to the palate for removal of maxillary third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36: 1177-1182.

  16. Yadav S, Verma A, Sachdeva A. Buccal injection of 2% lidocaine with edrenaline for the removal of maxillary third molars. Anesth Prog 2013; 60: 95-98.

  17. Ozec I, Tasdemir U, Gumus C et al. Is it possible to anaesthetize palatal tissues with buccal 4% articaine injection? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 1032-1037.

  18. Al-Mahalawy H, Abuohashish H, Chathoth S et al. Articaine versus lidocaine concentration in the palatal tissues after supra-periosteal buccal infiltration anaesthesia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.10.001.

  19. Panneerselvam E, Balasubramanian S, Raja V B et al. 'Plain lignocaine' vs 'Lignocaine with vasoconstrictor'Comparative evaluation of pain during administration and post-extraction wound healing by a double blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. Acta Odontol Scand 2016; 74: 374-379.

  20. Meechan J G. Effective topical anaesthetic agents and techniques. Dent Clin N Am 2002; 46: 759-766.

  21. Kravitz J. The palatal press and roll anaesthesia technique. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2006; 18: 242-245.

  22. Badenoch-Jones E K, David M, Lincoln T. Palatal injection for the removal of maxillary teeth: Current practice among oral and maxillofacial surgeons. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.01.034.

  23. Robertson D, Nusstein J, Reader A et al. The anaesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 1104-1112.

  24. Hintze A, Paessler L. Comparative investigations on the efficacy of articaine 4% (edrenaline 1:200,000) and articaine 2% (edrenaline 1:200,000) in local infiltration anaesthesia in dentistry - A randomized double-blind study. Clin Oral Investing 2006; 10: 145-150.

  25. Badcock M E, Gordon I, McCullough M J. A blinded randomized controlled trial comparing lignocaine and placebo administration to the palate for removal of maxillary third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36: 1177-1182.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are extremely grateful to the staff of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Alexandria University for their great support in achieving this work.

Approval was given by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University (IRB NO: 00010556-IORG: 0008839).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haytham A. Al-Mahalawy.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Mahalawy, H., El-Mahallawy, Y. Is nasopalatine nerve block still mandated for the extraction of maxillary anterior teeth?. Br Dent J 228, 865–868 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1632-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-1632-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links