Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Dental associates' perceptions of their working environment: a qualitative study


Background The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of dental associates and how these relate to their working environment.

Methods Qualitative methodology was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 associates in the UK in early 2018. Participants were asked about their working experiences, professional autonomy and the improvements they thought could be made to their working environment. Interview transcripts were analysed using deductive thematic analysis.

Results Three key themes were identified: 1) 'conditions', how associates view their working environment; 2) 'drivers', what associates believe drives their working conditions; 3) 'effects', how associates are affected by their working environment. There were differences between the working environments of associates working in corporate practice and those in independent practice. They relate primarily to decision-making and finances. While most associates enjoyed their job, a common factor that negatively affected associates was governance including the current NHS contract and actions of the General Dental Council.

Discussion The results of this study indicate that associates and the profession face a variety of issues today. The effects this has on associates could contribute to the changes that are being seen in the profession and are explored using social psychology theories.

Conclusion The findings of the study complement work demonstrating corporate associates to have lower levels of autonomy than their non-corporate peers and highlights that drivers vary between sectors. Social psychology theories indicate that the working environment could be affecting change in the profession.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. 1.

    Care Quality Commission. Using CQC data. 2019. Available at (accessed April 2019).

  2. 2.

    Carillion. Making tomorrow a better place: Annual Report and Accounts 2016. Available at (accessed April 2019).

  3. 3.

    Commons Select Committee. The collapse of Carillion inquiry launched. 2018. Available at (accessed April 2019).

  4. 4.

    Robbins C J, Rudsenske T, Vaughan J S. Private equity investment in health care services. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 27: 1389-1398.

  5. 5.

    McDonald R, Cheraghi-Sohi S, Sanders C, Ashcroft D. Professional status in a changing world: the case of medicines use reviews in English community pharmacy. Soc Sci Med 2010; 71: 451-458.

  6. 6.

    Jacobs S, Hassell K, Ashcroft D, Johnson S, O'Connor E. Workplace stress in community pharmacies in England: associations with individual, organizational and job characteristics. J Health Serv Res Policy 2014; 19: 27-33.

  7. 7.

    Jacobs S, Hassell K, Ashcroft D, Johnson S, O'Connor E. Perceived causes and effects of workplace stress in community pharmacy: findings from a postal survey of community pharmacists. Int J Pharm Pract 2011; 19 (Spec Iss): 100-101.

  8. 8.

    Murphy J A. Employers applying pressure to conduct MURs. 2007. Available at (accessed April 2019).

  9. 9.

    Perepelkin J, Dobson R T. Influence of ownership type on role orientation, role affinity, and role conflict among community pharmacy managers and owners in Canada. Res Social Adm Pharm 2010; 6: 280-292.

  10. 10.

    Harding H, Taylor K. The McDonaldisation of pharmacy. Pharm J 2000; 265: 602.

  11. 11.

    Bush J, Langley C A, Wilson K A. The corporatization of community pharmacy: implications for service provision, the public health function, and pharmacy's claims to professional status in the United Kingdom. Res Social Adm Pharm 2009; 5: 305-318.

  12. 12.

    Dobson R T Perepelkin J. Pharmacy ownership in Canada: implications for the authority and autonomy of community pharmacy managers. Res Social Adm Pharm 2011; 7: 347-358.

  13. 13.

    Taylor K, Harding G. Corporate pharmacy: implications for the pharmacy profession, researchers and teachers. 2003. Available at (accessed April 2019).

  14. 14.

    Sidu A. Glorified shelf stackers? Pharm J 2003; 270: 152.

  15. 15.

    Ritzer G. The McDonaldization of Society. 8th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2014.

  16. 16.

    O'Selmo E, Collin V, Whitehead P. Associates and their working environment: a comparison of corporate and non-corporate associates. Br Dent J 2018; 225: 425-430.

  17. 17.

    Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77-101.

  18. 18.

    Neale J, Miller P, West R. Reporting quantitative information in qualitative research: guidance for authors and reviewers. Addiction 2014; 109: 175-176.

  19. 19.

    Queen's University Belfast. The dynamics of bureaucracy. Available at,291460,en.pdf (accessed April 2019).

  20. 20.

    Chakrabortty A. How Boots went rogue. The Guardian (London) 2016 April 13.

  21. 21.

    Larkin I, Loewenstein G. Business Model-Related Conflict of Interests in Medicine: Problems and Potential Solutions. JAMA 2017; 317: 1745-1746.

  22. 22.

    McCoy M S, Emanuel E J. Why There Are No "Potential" Conflicts of Interest. JAMA 2017; 317: 1721-1722.

  23. 23.

    Lo B, Ott C. What is the enemy in CME, conflicts of interest or bias? JAMA 2013; 310: 1019-1020.

  24. 24.

    Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957.

  25. 25.

    Burke S, Schmidt G, Wagner S, Hoffman R, Hanlon N. Cognitive Dissonance in Social Work. J Public Child Welf 2017; 11: 299-317.

  26. 26.

    IDH Finance. Annual report for Bondholders Year ended 31 March 2018. Available at (accessed April 2019).

  27. 27.

    Holden A. Dentistry's social contract and the loss of professionalism. Aust Dent J 2017; 62: 79-83.

  28. 28.

    Hafferty F W, Castellani B. The increasing complexities of professionalism. Acad Med 2010; 85: 288-301.

  29. 29.

    Collins S. Statutory Social Workers: Stress, Job Satisfaction, Coping, Social Support and Individual Differences. Br J Soc Work 2008; 38: 1173-1193.

  30. 30.

    LDC Conference. Question time debate: getting prevention back into the dental contract. 2018.

  31. 31.

    Gruber M. Cognitive dissonance theory and motivation for change: a case study. Gastroenterol Nurs 2003; 26: 242-245.

  32. 32.

    Price L, Duffy K, McCallum J, Ness V. Are theoretical perspectives useful to explain nurses' tolerance of suboptimal care? J Nurs Manag 2015; 23: 940-944.

  33. 33.

    Department of Health and Social Care. NHS Constitution for England. 2012. Available at (accessed April 2019).

  34. 34.

    Bradley E H, Curry L A, Devers K J. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res 2007; 42: 1758-1772.

  35. 35.

    Yardley L. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychol Health 2000; 15: 215-228.

  36. 36.

    Komatsu H, Yagasaki K, Yamauchi H. Fertility decision-making under certainty and uncertainty in cancer patients. Sex Reprod Healthc 2018; 15: 40-45.

  37. 37.

    Papakostopoulou M, Hurst D. Disseminating research evidence: what matters to general dental practitioners? Br Dent J 2018; 225: 413-417.

  38. 38.

    Abarca E, Campos S, Herskovic V, Fuentes C. Perceptions on technology for volunteer respite care for bedridden elders in Chile. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2018; 13: 1422663.

  39. 39.

    Collin V, Toon M, O'Selmo E, Reynolds L, Whitehead P. A survey of stress, burnout and well-being in UK dentists. Br Dent J 2019; 226: 40-49.

Download references


EO would like to thank the BDA Trust Fund and the Shirley Glasstone Hughes Trust Fund for funding this project and those who participated.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellena O’Selmo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Selmo, E., Collin, V. & Whitehead, P. Dental associates' perceptions of their working environment: a qualitative study. Br Dent J 226, 955–962 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links