Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Efficacy of low dose and short duration defibrotide prophylaxis for hepatic veno-occlusive disease after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Abstract

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is a serious systemic endothelial complication after stem cell transplantation. Defibrotide is under investigation as a prophylactic agent for VOD; however, high costs limit its utility. We evaluated the prophylactic efficacy of a low-dose defibrotide regimen for VOD. We retrospectively enrolled 147 paediatric patients who underwent autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT; 69 with defibrotide prophylaxis and 78 historical controls) at the Yonsei Cancer Center in Seoul, Korea, between March 2013 and Feb 2020. Low-dose defibrotide (12.5 mg/kg/day) was administered from D−3 to D+10 after HSCT. The most common diagnosis in the cohort was brain tumour (N = 86). VOD developed in 10 (12.8%) and 3 (4.3%) patients in the control and prophylaxis groups, respectively (P = 0.071). In the second HSCT group, VOD incidence was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group [2.9% (1/35)] than in the control group (28.6%, 6/21, P = 0.005). VOD severity was significantly higher in the control group than in the prophylaxis group (P = 0.006). Three VOD-related mortalities occurred in the control group, whereas no VOD-related mortality occurred in the prophylaxis group. In conclusion, low-dose defibrotide prophylaxis is a promising and economical strategy for preventing VOD, especially in second-round HSCT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Cumulative incidence of veno-occlusive disease (VOD).
Fig. 2: Severity of veno-occlusive disease (VOD).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Corbacioglu S, Carreras E, Ansari M, Balduzzi A, Cesaro S, Dalle JH, et al. Diagnosis and severity criteria for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease in pediatric patients: a new classification from the European society for blood and marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2018;53:138–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Palomo M, Diaz-Ricart M, Rovira M, Escolar G, Carreras E. Defibrotide prevents the activation of macrovascular and microvascular endothelia caused by soluble factors released to blood by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2011;17:497–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mohty M, Malard F, Abecassis M, Aerts E, Alaskar AS, Aljurf M, et al. Revised diagnosis and severity criteria for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease in adult patients: a new classification from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2016;51:906–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McDonald GB, Hinds MS, Fisher LD, Schoch HG, Wolford JL, Banaji M, et al. Veno-occlusive disease of the liver and multiorgan failure after bone marrow transplantation: a cohort study of 355 patients. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:255–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones RJ, Lee KS, Beschorner WE, Vogel VG, Grochow LB, Braine HG, et al. Venoocclusive disease of the liver following bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation. 1987;44:778–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald GB, Sharma P, Matthews DE, Shulman HM, Thomas ED. The clinical course of 53 patients with venocclusive disease of the liver after marrow transplantation. Transplantation. 1985;39:603–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McDonald GB, Sharma P, Matthews DE, Shulman HM, Thomas ED. Venocclusive disease of the liver after bone marrow transplantation: diagnosis, incidence, and predisposing factors. Hepatology. 1984;4:116–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coppell JA, Richardson PG, Soiffer R, Martin PL, Kernan NA, Chen A, et al. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease following stem cell transplantation: incidence, clinical course, and outcome. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2010;16:157–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dignan FL, Wynn RF, Hadzic N, Karani J, Quaglia A, Pagliuca A, et al. BCSH/BSBMT guideline: diagnosis and management of veno-occlusive disease (sinusoidal obstruction syndrome) following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2013;163:444–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohty M, Malard F, Abecassis M, Aerts E, Alaskar AS, Aljurf M, et al. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease: current situation and perspectives-a position statement from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Bone Marrow Transpl. 2015;50:781–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Corbacioglu S, Cesaro S, Faraci M, Valteau-Couanet D, Gruhn B, Rovelli A, et al. Defibrotide for prophylaxis of hepatic veno-occlusive disease in paediatric haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation: an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:1301–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheuk DK, Chiang AK, Ha SY, Chan GC. Interventions for prophylaxis of hepatic veno-occlusive disease in people undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:Cd009311. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009311.pub2.

  13. Zhang L, Wang Y, Huang H. Defibrotide for the prevention of hepatic veno-occlusive disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review. Clin Transplant 2012;26:511–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bajwa RPS, Mahadeo KM, Taragin BH, Dvorak CC, McArthur J, Jeyapalan A, et al. Consensus report by pediatric acute lung injury and sepsis investigators and pediatric blood and marrow transplantation consortium joint working committees: supportive care guidelines for management of veno-occlusive disease in children and adolescents, part 1: focus on investigations, prophylaxis, and specific treatment. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2017;23:1817–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pichler H, Horner K, Engstler G, Poetschger U, Glogova E, Karlhuber S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of defibrotide in the prophylaxis of veno-occlusive disease after pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2017;23:1128–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Coutsouvelis J, Avery S, Dooley M, Kirkpatrick C, Spencer A. Defibrotide for the management of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in patients who undergo haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;50:200–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohty M, Malard F, Abecasis M, Aerts E, Alaskar AS, Aljurf M, et al. Prophylactic, preemptive, and curative treatment for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease in adult patients: a position statement from an international expert group. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2020;55:485–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chalandon Y, Roosnek E, Mermillod B, Newton A, Ozsahin H, Wacker P, et al. Prevention of veno-occlusive disease with defibrotide after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2004;10:347–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dignan F, Gujral D, Ethell M, Evans S, Treleaven J, Morgan G, et al. Prophylactic defibrotide in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: minimal morbidity and zero mortality from veno-occlusive disease. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2007;40:79–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Qureshi A, Marshall L, Lancaster D. Defibrotide in the prevention and treatment of veno-occlusive disease in autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50:831–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dalle JH, Giralt SA. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors and stratification, prophylaxis, and treatment. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2016;22:400–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park M, Park HJ, Eom HS, Kwon YJ, Park JA, Lim YJ, et al. Safety and effects of prophylactic defibrotide for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2013;18:36–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Veenstra DL, Guzauskas GF, Villa KF, Boudreau DM. The budget impact and cost-effectiveness of defibrotide for treatment of veno-occlusive disease with multi-organ dysfunction in patients post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant. J Med Econ. 2017;20:453–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung Woo Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roh, Y.Y., Hahn, S.M., Kim, H.S. et al. Efficacy of low dose and short duration defibrotide prophylaxis for hepatic veno-occlusive disease after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 56, 411–418 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-020-01036-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-020-01036-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links