Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia in adolescent patients

Subjects

Abstract

Patients between 14 and 22 years old are underrepresented in both adult and pediatric studies. We analyzed the outcomes of 94 consecutive patients aged between 14 and 22 who underwent myeloablative matched related-donor transplant while in first or second complete remission. We studied the impact of disease type, remission status, ELN risk group, ABO mismatch, time from diagnosis to transplant, patient and donor age, conditioning type, stem cell source, and the year of transplant on transplant outcomes. The cumulative incidences of relapse, NRM, OS, and DFS at 5 years were 42%, 10%, 59%, and 48%, respectively. Absence of ABO mismatch and donor age > 20 were associated with better OS and DFS on univariate and multivariate analysis. The cumulative incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD were 18% and 44%, respectively. Donor age > 20 and peripheral blood stem cell source were significantly associated with higher incidence of cGVHD on univariate and multivariate analysis. Younger patient age was significantly associated with higher incidence of aGVHD. In this age group, the determinants of survival seem to be dependent on donor variables rather on the traditional disease and patient related variables. Relapse still a significant factor for transplant failure while NRM was low.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morgan S, Davies S, Palmer S, Plaster M. Sex, drugs, and rock ‘n’ roll: caring for adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4825–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Veal GJ, Hartford CM, Stewart CF. Clinical pharmacology in the adolescent oncology patient. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4790–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gramatges MM, Rabin KR. The adolescent and young adult with cancer: state of the art–acute leukemias. Curr Oncol Rep. 2013;15:317–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Treadgold CL, Kuperberg A. Been there, done that, wrote the blog: the choices and challenges of supporting adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4842–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Butow P, Palmer S, Pai A, Goodenough B, Luckett T, King M. Review of adherence-related issues in adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4800–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Levine J, Canada A, Stern CJ. Fertility preservation in adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4831–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kent EE, Sender LS, Morris RA, Grigsby TJ, Montoya MJ, Ziogas A, et al. Multilevel socioeconomic effects on quality of life in adolescent and young adult survivors of leukemia and lymphoma. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1339–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pemmaraju N, Kantarjian H, Ravandi F, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, Huang X, O’Brien S, et al. Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016;4:213–22.

  9. Wein S, Pery S, Zer A. Role of palliative care in adolescent and young adult oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4819–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coccia PF, Pappo AS, Altman J, Bhatia S, Borinstein SC, Flynn J, et al. Adolescent and young adult oncology, version 2. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014;12:21–32. quiz

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bleyer A, Budd T, Montello M. Adolescents and young adults with cancer: the scope of the problem and criticality of clinical trials. Cancer. 2006;107:1645–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bleyer A, Viny A, Barr R. Cancer in 15- to 29-year-olds by primary site. Oncologist. 2006;11:590–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmad OB, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJL, Lozano R, Inoue M. Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. 9. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barr RD, Ries LA, Lewis DR, Harlan LC, Keegan TH, Pollock BH, et al. Incidence and incidence trends of the most frequent cancers in adolescent and young adult Americans, including “nonmalignant/noninvasive” tumors. Cancer. 2016;122:1000–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Creutzig U, Zimmermann M, Reinhardt D, Rasche M, von Neuhoff C, Alpermann T, et al. Changes in cytogenetics and molecular genetics in acute myeloid leukemia from childhood to adult age groups. Cancer. 2016;122:3821–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bolouri H, Farrar JE, Triche T Jr, Ries RE, Lim EL, Alonzo TA, et al. The molecular landscape of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia reveals recurrent structural alterations and age-specific mutational interactions. Nat Med. 2018;24:103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, Gaidzik VI, Paschka P, Roberts ND, et al. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. New Engl J Med. 2016;374:2209–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. New Engl J Med. 2013;368:2059–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Appelbaum FR, Gundacker H, Head DR, Slovak ML, Willman CL, Godwin JE, et al. Age and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2006;107:3481–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Burnett A, Wetzler M, Lowenberg B. Therapeutic advances in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:487–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomizawa D, Watanabe T, Hanada R, Horibe K, Horikoshi Y, Iwamoto S, et al. Outcome of adolescent patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with pediatric protocols. Int J Hematol. 2015;102:318–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Canner J, Alonzo TA, Franklin J, Freyer DR, Gamis A, Gerbing RB, et al. Differences in outcomes of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia for adolescent/young adult and younger patients: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Cancer. 2013;119:4162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 Consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–8.

  25. Sullivan KM. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease in man. Int J Cell Cloning. 1986;4:42–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Majhail NS, Brazauskas R, Hassebroek A, Bredeson CN, Hahn T, Hale GA, et al. Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adolescent and young adults compared with children and older adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18:861–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weisdorf D, Hakke R, Blazar B, Miller W, McGlave P, Ramsay N, et al. Risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease in histocompatible donor bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation. 1991;51:1197–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Saraceni F, Beohou E, Labopin M, Arcese W, Bonifazi F, Stepensky P, et al. Thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine compared to busulfan and cyclophosphamide as conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplant from matched siblings and unrelated donors for acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:1211–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Saraceni F, Labopin M, Hamladji R-M, Mufti G, Socie G, Shimoni A, et al. Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine compared to busulfan-fludarabine for sibling and unrelated donor transplant in acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. Oncotarget. 2018;9:3379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Riad El Fakih or Ahmed Kotb.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Fakih, R., Kotb, A., Hashmi, S. et al. Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia in adolescent patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 55, 182–188 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0667-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0667-1

Search

Quick links