Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Adoptive cell therapy using engineered natural killer cells

Abstract

The generation of autologous T cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) have revolutionized the field of adoptive cellular therapy. CAR-T cells directed against CD19 have resulted in remarkable clinical responses in patients affected by B-lymphoid malignancies. However, the production of allogeneic CAR-T cells products remains expensive and clinically challenging. Moreover, the toxicity profile of CAR T-cells means that currently these life-saving treatments are only delivered in specialized centers. Therefore, efforts are underway to develop reliable off-the-shelf cellular products with acceptable safety profiles for the treatment of patients with cancer. Natural killer (NK) cells are innate effector lymphocytes with potent antitumor activity. The availability of NK cells from multiple sources and their proven safety profile in the allogeneic setting positions them as attractive contenders for cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss advantages and potential drawbacks of using NK cells as a novel cellular therapy against hematologic malignancies, as well as strategies to further enhance their effector function.

Introduction

Adoptive cell therapy has become a powerful treatment modality for advanced cancers refractory to conventional therapy. Remarkable clinical results have been reported in patients receiving autologous T cells for the treatment of B-lymphoid malignancies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The first two T-cell therapy using gene-modified chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), were approved in August 2017 by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and refractory or relapsed large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) [7, 8]. The third product – Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) was approved for refractory lymphoma in May 2018. However, CAR-modified T cells still have a number of limitations: (i) it can be clinically challenging to generate autologous products for each individual patient, (ii) the price of CAR T-cell therapy, which include the manufacturing costs, administration of lymphodepleting chemotherapy and the need for inpatient care may ultimately be economically unviable for many health care systems; (iii) the longer time that is required to generate CAR T-cells may result in unavoidable delays in therapy, especially for patients with rapidly advancing disease. Although allogeneic products have the potential to overcome these limitations, allogeneic T-cells (even if HLA-matched) can mediate graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) [9] through their native T-cell receptor. Natural killer (NK) cells, on the other hand, may provide an attractive and safe source of allogeneic cells from immunotherapy. In contrast to other lymphocytes such as T cells, NK cells do not express rearranged, antigen-specific receptors; rather, their effector function is dictated by the integration of signals received through germline-encoded receptors that can recognize ligands on their cellular targets. Functionally, NK cell receptors are classified as activating or inhibitory and, upon recognition of specific cellular ligands, induce a positive or a negative signal, respectively [10,11,12,13,14]. Therefore, NK cells are of great clinical interest for CAR engineering for the following reasons: (i) allogeneic NK cells do not cause GVHD [13, 15,16,17,18], (ii) their relatively short life-span can allow an effective antitumor activity while reducing long-term adverse events such as cytopenia; and (iii) since CAR-NK cells recognize and target tumor cells through their native receptors, the possibility of tumor escape by downregulating the CAR target antigen is less likely to happen than with CAR T-cells [19]. Another attractive possibility could be to select donors for CAR-NK production based on killer cell immunoglobulin receptor (KIR)-ligand mismatch with the recipient or haplotype B KIR gene, as both of these have been reported to be beneficial in the setting of allogeneic stem cell transplantation [20,21,22,23]. Thus, CAR-NK cells have the potential to be used as an off-the-shelf cellular immunotherapy for immediate administration as clinically needed and could overcome some of the obstacles related to logistics and costs.

Genetic modification of NK cells to enhance their function for cancer immunotherapy

Genetic modification to improve NK cell persistence

A major drawback of using NK cells for adoptive transfer is their inability to persist in the absence of cytokine support [24]. Recent studies have shown that in vivo proliferation and persistence of NK cells following adoptive transfer may predict clinical response [25]. A number of groups including ours have developed novel strategies to genetically manipulate NK cells to express cytokines for autocrine proliferation [26,27,28]. NK cells engineered using a retroviral construct to express IL2 and IL15 were shown to mediate superior in vivo growth and activity in tumor-bearing mice, without the need to add exogenous cytokines [26, 27]. In addition, our group recently demonstrated that ex vivo expanded NK cells transduced to express a CAR against CD19 and to ectopically produce IL-15 can dramatically enhance the in vivo antitumor activity and persistence of CAR-NK cells in a mouse model of lymphoma [28].

Genetic modification of NK cells to improve their cytotoxicity

NK cells express an array of activating and inhibitory receptors on their cell surface and therefore provide a unique opportunity to skew their signaling balance towards activation as a way to enhance killing of target cells. This can be achieved by introducing strategies to block inhibitory receptors, enhance the function of activating receptors or redirect the specificity of NK cells.

Blocking inhibitory receptors

Inhibitory receptors KIRs (iKIRs) are constitutively expressed on NK cells and bind to HLA class I molecules to block NK-cell cytotoxic response against healthy cells. This interaction explains the ‘missing-self’ hypothesis, which postulates that NK cells survey tissues for normal levels of the ubiquitously expressed MHC class I molecule [14]. If there is downregulation of HLA class I on target cells, (i.e. ‘missing-self’), then the NK cell becomes activated if an activation receptor is also engaged [29, 30]. In the setting of haploidentical stem cell transplantation, patients with acute myeloid leukemia that have a KIR ligand-mismatched donor have superior relapse-free survival [13]. Thus, pharmacological inhibition of inhibitory receptors to enhance NK cell function is an area of active research. One such approach is to simulate KIR-ligand mismatch by preventing KIR-HLA interactions using an anti-KIR monoclonal antibody (Lirilumab) either alone or in combination with other immunotherapeutic agents. This approach is under investigation for hematologic and solid tumors [31, 32]. NKG2A, a C-type lectin receptor, is another inhibitory receptor that interacts with HLA-E, a nonclassical HLA class I molecules, and it is upregulated on cells from many cancers [33]. Silencing NKG2A triggers an NK cell “missing-self” response and promotes higher NK cell cytotoxicity against HLA-E-expressing cancer cell lines both in vivo and in vitro [33, 34]. Monalizumab (previously IPH2201) is a novel anti-NKG2A blocking antibody that is currently under investigation as monotherapy or in combination with other immunomodulatory agents in phase I/II clinical trials.

Enhancing NK cell functional activity

NK cells also express an array of activating receptors on their surface which include the natural cytotoxicity receptors NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30, the C-type lectins NKG2D and NKG2C, and a number of activating co-receptors including 2B4 and DNAM-1. Strategies to upregulate expression of these molecules include exposure to cytokines such as IL-2 or IL15 or gene transduction [24, 26]. NK cell antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity can also be directed towards specific targets through the NK cell Fc receptor CD16 (FcγRIIIa). Strategies under investigation include the use of bispecific killer cell engagers (BiKEs) or trispecific killer cell engagers (TriKEs) (Reviewed in [35]).

CAR-engineered NK cells

The cytotoxic activity of NK cells can be enhanced by redirecting their specificity against a specific antigen using a CAR, thus allowing the killing of previously resistant targets. The feasibility of genetically engineering NK cell lines and primary NK cells to express CARs has been shown in preclinical studies against multiple targets including B and T cell malignancies, multiple myeloma, glioblastoma, neuroectodermal tumors, epithelial cancers, and melanoma (Reviewed in refs. [36, 37]). Although NK cell lines such as NK92 cells are easily expanded in culture and can provide an unlimited source of cells for immunotherapy [38], they are derived from patients with NK lymphoma/leukemia and have a number of shortcomings. Irradiation of these cells is required to reduce potential safety issues such as in vivo tumorigenicity, which will likely affect their in vivo proliferation, efficacy, and persistence. Given the above-mentioned limitations of CAR-engineered NK cell lines, others have developed approaches to introduce CARs into primary NK cells derived from peripheral blood, umbilical cord blood (CB), or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) (reviewed in ref. [37]). Our group at MD Anderson Cancer Center has developed a GMP compliant pipeline for the generation of CAR-NK cells obtained from CB. A first-in-human clinical trial to test the safety and efficacy of off-the-shelf CB-derived NK cells engineered to express a CD19 CAR and IL-15 to support their autocrine proliferation and persistence in vivo is under way at our center (NCT03056339).

Concluding remarks

Adoptive cell therapy using genetically engineered immune cells has emerged as a powerful treatment for certain cancers, as recently demonstrated by the use autologous CAR T-cells for the treatment of patients with B-lymphoid malignancies [1,2,3,4,5,6]. NK cells are strong contenders for allogeneic effector immune cells for cancer immunotherapy. Indeed, recent advances in our understanding of NK cell biology and their feasibility to be genetically modified to express a CAR against various cancer targets provide a unique opportunity to develop novel NK cell-based cancer therapeutics. Future genetic manipulation strategies using TALEN or CRISPR/Cas9 provide unprecedented opportunities to further enhance the activity of NK cell-based therapeutic by enhancing their effector cytotoxic function while preserving their safety profile, and to improve their persistence and antigen specificity.

References

  1. 1.

    June CH, Blazar BR, Riley JL. Engineering lymphocyte subsets: tools, trials and tribulations. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:704–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP, Yang JC, Morgan RA, Dudley ME. Adoptive cell transfer: a clinical path to effective cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:299–308.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sadelain M, Riviere I, Brentjens R. Targeting tumours with genetically enhanced T lymphocytes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:35–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Brentjens RJ, Davila ML, Riviere I, Park J, Wang X, Cowell LG, et al. CD19-targeted T cells rapidly induce molecular remissions in adults with chemotherapy-refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:177ra38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Grupp SA, Kalos M, Barrett D, Aplenc R, Porter DL, Rheingold SR, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1509–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Porter DL, Levine BL, Kalos M, Bagg A, June CH. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:725–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, Lekakis LJ, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2531–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Panel OKs CAR T therapy for leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2017;7:924.

  9. 9.

    Goulmy E. Human minor histocompatibility antigens: new concepts for marrow transplantation and adoptive immunotherapy. Immunol Rev. 1997;157:125–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lanier LL. Up on the tightrope: natural killer cell activation and inhibition. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:495–502.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yawata M, Yawata N, Draghi M, Partheniou F, Little AM, Parham P. MHC class I-specific inhibitory receptors and their ligands structure diverse human NK-cell repertoires toward a balance of missing self-response. Blood. 2008;112:2369–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Caligiuri MA. Human natural killer cells. Blood. 2008;112:461–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ruggeri L, Capanni M, Urbani E, Perruccio K, Shlomchik WD, Tosti A, et al. Effectiveness of donor natural killer cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic transplants. Science. 2002;295:2097–2100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ljunggren HG, Karre K. In search of the ‘missing self’: MHC molecules and NK cell recognition. Immunol Today. 1990;11:237–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Olson JA, Leveson-Gower DB, Gill S, Baker J, Beilhack A, Negrin RS. NK cells mediate reduction of GVHD by inhibiting activated, alloreactive T cells while retaining GVT effects. Blood. 2010;115:4293–301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Miller JS, Soignier Y, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, McNearney SA, Yun GH, Fautsch SK, et al. Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with cancer. Blood. 2005;105:3051–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Curti A, Ruggeri L, D’Addio A, Bontadini A, Dan E, Motta MR, et al. Successful transfer of alloreactive haploidentical KIR ligand-mismatched natural killer cells after infusion in elderly high risk acute myeloid leukemia patients. Blood. 2011;118:3273–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shah N, Li L, McCarty J, Kaur I, Yvon E, Shaim H et al. Phase I study of cord blood-derived natural killer cells combined with autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2017;177:457–466.

  19. 19.

    Sotillo E, Barrett DM, Black KL, Bagashev A, Oldridge D, Wu G, et al. Convergence of acquired mutations and alternative splicing of CD19 enables resistance to CART-19 immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:1282–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cooley S, Weisdorf DJ, Guethlein LA, Klein JP, Wang T, Le CT, et al. Donor selection for natural killer cell receptor genes leads to superior survival after unrelated transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2010;116:2411–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cooley S, Trachtenberg E, Bergemann TL, Saeteurn K, Klein J, Le CT, et al. Donors with group B KIR haplotypes improve relapse-free survival after unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2009;113:726–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Venstrom JM, Pittari G, Gooley TA, Chewning JH, Spellman S, Haagenson M, et al. HLA-C-dependent prevention of leukemia relapse by donor activating KIR2DS1. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:805–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sekine T, Marin D, Cao K, Li L, Mehta P, Shaim H, et al. Specific combinations of donor and recipient KIR-HLA genotypes predict for large differences in outcome after cord blood transplantation. Blood. 2016;128:297–312.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fujisaki H, Kakuda H, Shimasaki N, Imai C, Ma J, Lockey T, et al. Expansion of highly cytotoxic human natural killer cells for cancer cell therapy. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4010–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bachanova V, Cooley S, DeFor TE, Verneris MR, Zhang B, McKenna DH, et al. Clearance of acute myeloid leukemia by haploidentical natural killer cells is improved using IL-2 diphtheria toxin fusion protein. Blood. 2014;123:3855–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Imamura M, Shook D, Kamiya T, Shimasaki N, Chai SM, Coustan-Smith E, et al. Autonomous growth and increased cytotoxicity of natural killer cells expressing membrane-bound interleukin-15. Blood. 2014;124:1081–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nagashima S, Mailliard R, Kashii Y, Reichert TE, Herberman RB, Robbins P, et al. Stable transduction of the interleukin-2 gene into human natural killer cell lines and their phenotypic and functional characterization in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 1998;91:3850–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Liu E, Tong Y, Dotti G, Shaim H, Savoldo B, Mukherjee M et al. Cord blood NK cells engineered to express IL-15 and a CD19-targeted CAR show long-term persistence and potent antitumor activity. Leukemia. 2018;32:520–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.226.

  29. 29.

    Liao NS, Bix M, Zijlstra M, Jaenisch R, Raulet D. MHC class I deficiency: susceptibility to natural killer (NK) cells and impaired NK activity. Science. 1991;253:199–202.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kim S, Poursine-Laurent J, Truscott SM, Lybarger L, Song YJ, Yang L, et al. Licensing of natural killer cells by host major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. Nature. 2005;436:709–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Nijhof IS, Lammerts van Bueren JJ, van KB, Andre P, Morel Y, Lokhorst HM, et al. Daratumumab-mediated lysis of primary multiple myeloma cells is enhanced in combination with the human anti-KIR antibody IPH2102 and lenalidomide. Haematologica. 2015;100:263–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kohrt HE, Thielens A, Marabelle A, Sagiv-Barfi I, Sola C, Chanuc F, et al. Anti-KIR antibody enhancement of anti-lymphoma activity of natural killer cells as monotherapy and in combination with anti-CD20 antibodies. Blood. 2014;123:678–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Borrego F, Masilamani M, Kabat J, Sanni TB, Coligan JE. The cell biology of the human natural killer cell CD94/NKG2A inhibitory receptor. Mol Immunol. 2005;42:485–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Figueiredo C, Seltsam A, Blasczyk R. Permanent silencing of NKG2A expression for cell-based therapeutics. J Mol Med. 2009;87:199–210.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ochoa MC, Minute L, Rodriguez I, Garasa S, Perez-Ruiz E, Inoges S, et al. Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity: immunotherapy strategies enhancing effector NK cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2017;95:347–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mehta RS, Rezvani K. Chimeric antigen receptor expressing natural killer cells for the immunotherapy of cancer. Front Immunol. 2018;9:283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rezvani K, Rouce R, Liu E, Shpall E. Engineering natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy. Mol Ther. 2017;25:1769–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Klingemann H, Boissel L, Toneguzzo F. Natural killer cells for immunotherapy - advantages of the NK-92 cell line over blood NK cells. Front Immunol. 2016;7:91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Publication of this supplement was sponsored by Gilead Sciences Europe Ltd, Cell Source, Inc., The Chorafas Institute for Scientific Exchange of the Weizmann Institute of Science, Kiadis Pharma, Miltenyi Biotec, Celgene, Centro Servizi Congressuali, Almog Diagnostic. The author’s research are funded in part by grants from the Leukemia Lymphoma Society (LLS Grant ID: 6555-18), the NIH (R01 CA211044-01), the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (RSG-15-218-01-LIB), the American Cancer Society (ACS RSG-15-218-01-LIB) and the generous philanthropic support of the MD Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shots programs.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katayoun Rezvani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rezvani, K. Adoptive cell therapy using engineered natural killer cells. Bone Marrow Transplant 54, 785–788 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0601-6

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links