ABO blood type incompatibility lost the unfavorable impact on outcome in unrelated bone marrow transplantation

Abstract

The effects of ABO incompatibility on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remain controversial. Large cohorts are required to obtain findings that allow for definite conclusions. We previously demonstrated poor overall survival and increased treatment-related mortality (TRM) in ABO-incompatible unrelated bone marrow transplantation (UR-BMT) performed during the period from 1993 to 2005. To improve our understanding of ABO-incompatible transplantation, we reanalyzed the effects of ABO mismatch in a UR-BMT cohort in Japan after 2000. Multivariate analyses for the 2000–2006 cohort showed that major ABO mismatch was associated with poor overall survival (HR, 1.211; 95% CI, 1.062 to 1.381; p = 0.004) and increased TRM (HR, 1.357; 95% CI, 1.146 to 1.608; p < 0.001). In the 2007–2015 cohort, major incompatibility had no effect on overall survival (HR, 0.987, p = 0.804) or TRM (HR, 1.020, p = 0.790). Delayed engraftment of erythrocytes, platelets, and neutrophils in cases of major mismatch was common between the two cohorts. In conclusion, the adverse effect of ABO major incompatibility has become less significant over time.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Worel N. ABO-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transfus Med Hemother. 2016;43:3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Logan AC, Wang Z, Alimoghaddam K, Wong RM, Lai T, Negrin RS, et al. ABO mismatch is associated with increased nonrelapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:746–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kimura F, Sato K, Kobayashi S, Ikeda T, Sao H, Okamoto S, et al. Impact of AB0-blood group incompatibility on the outcome of recipients of bone marrow transplants from unrelated donors in the Japan Marrow Donor Program. Haematologica. 2008;93:1686–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Damodar S, Shanley R, MacMillan M, Ustun C, Weisdorf D. Donor-to-recipient ABO mismatch does not impact outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation regardless of graft source. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23:795–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sasazuki T, Juji T, Morishima Y, Kinukawa N, Kashiwabara H, Inoko H, et al. Effect of matching of class I HLA alleles on clinical outcome after transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells from an unrelated donor. Japan Marrow Donor Program. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1177–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Morishima Y, Sasazuki T, Inoko H, Juji T, Akaza T, Yamamoto K, et al. The clinical significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allele compatibility in patients receiving a marrow transplant from serologically HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR matched unrelated donors. Blood. 2002;99:4200–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kanda Y, Kanda J, Atsuta Y, Maeda Y, Ichinohe T, Ohashi K, et al. Impact of a single human leucocyte antigen (HLA) allele mismatch on the outcome of unrelated bone marrow transplantation over two time periods. A retrospective analysis of 3003 patients from the HLA Working Group of the Japan Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2013;161:566–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kawase T, Morishima Y, Matsuo K, Kashiwase K, Inoko H, Saji H, et al. High-risk HLA allele mismatch combinations responsible for severe acute graft-versus-host disease and implication for its molecular mechanism. Blood. 2007;110:2235–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kanda Y, Kanda J, Atsuta Y, Fuji S, Maeda Y, Ichinohe T, et al. Changes in the clinical impact of high-risk human leukocyte antigen allele mismatch combinations on the outcome of unrelated bone marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20:526–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Atsuta Y, Suzuki R, Yoshimi A, Gondo H, Tanaka J, Hiraoka A, et al. Unification of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation registries in Japan and establishment of the TRUMP system. Int J Hematol. 2007;86:269–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Atsuta Y. Introduction of Transplant Registry Unified Management Program 2 (TRUMP2): scripts for TRUMP data analyses, part I (variables other than HLA-related data). Int J Hematol. 2016;103:3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kanda J. Scripts for TRUMP data analyses. Part II (HLA-related data): statistical analyses specific for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol. 2016;103:11–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 Consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sullivan KM, Agura E, Anasetti C, Appelbaum F, Badger C, Bearman S, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease and other late complications of bone marrow transplantation. Semin Hematol. 1991;28:250–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Giralt S, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Bacigalupo A, Horowitz M, Pasquini M, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen workshop: defining the dose spectrum. Report of a workshop convened by the center for international blood and marrow transplant research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:367–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rowley SD, Donato ML, Bhattacharyya P. Red blood cell-incompatible allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011;46:1167–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Seebach JD, Stussi G, Passweg JR, Loberiza FR Jr., Gajewski JL, Keating A, et al. ABO blood group barrier in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation revisited. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11:1006–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rozman P, Kosir A, Bohinjec M. Is the ABO incompatibility a risk factor in bone marrow transplantation? Transpl Immunol. 2005;14:159–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Canaani J, Savani BN, Labopin M, Huang X-j, Ciceri F, Arcese W, et al. Impact of ABO incompatibility on patients’ outcome after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia - a report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. Haematologica. 2017;102:1066–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang Y, Wu DP, Liu QF, Xu LP, Liu KY, Zhang XH, et al. Donor and recipient age, gender and ABO incompatibility regardless of donor source: validated criteria for donor selection for haematopoietic transplants. Leukemia. 2018;32:492–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Practical Research Project for Allergic Diseases and Immunology (Research Technology of Medical Transplantation) from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED under Grant Number 18ek0510023h0002. The authors thank all of the physicians and data managers at the centers that contributed valuable data on transplantation to the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and the Japan Marrow Donor Program.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumihiko Kimura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kimura, F., Kanda, J., Ishiyama, K. et al. ABO blood type incompatibility lost the unfavorable impact on outcome in unrelated bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 54, 1676–1685 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0496-2

Download citation

Further reading