Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Mutations and thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia

Dear Editor,

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) constitutes one of the three JAK2/MPL/CALR-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), which also include polycythemia vera (PV) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF)1. ET is defined by clonal thrombocytosis (platelet count ≥450 × 109/L) and characteristic bone marrow megakaryocyte morphology; the clinical phenotype in ET might include leukocytosis, splenomegaly, microvascular symptoms, and thrombohemorrhagic complications1. Most patients with ET enjoy a near-normal life expectancy while disease progression into fibrotic or leukemic transformation is relatively infrequent (<1% in the first 10 years of disease)2. Collaborative studies between the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA and University of Florence, Florence, Italy have recently established an integrated clinical and genetic survival risk model for ET3. According to this new mutation-enhanced international prognostic model for ET (MIPSS-ET), independent risk factors for overall survival included SF3B1/SRSF2 mutations (occurring in ̴ 10% of patients), age >60 years, male sex, and leukocytosis (≥11 × 109/L). To date, drug therapy has not been shown to influence survival in ET and is instead directed at decreasing the risk of thrombosis. In the latter regard, four risk categories are recognized: very low risk (age ≤ 60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild type), low risk (age ≤ 60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2 mutated), intermediate risk (age > 60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild type) and high risk (thrombosis history or age >60 years with JAK2 mutation)1. In the current two-center study involving 502 patients (seen between 1967 through 2017) with World Health Organization (WHO)-defined ET, we sought to further clarify the influence of driver and other mutations on both arterial and venous thrombosis, in the context of other established risk factors.

Study patients were recruited from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA and the University of Florence, Florence, Italy, based on the availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-derived mutation information (Table 1). Diagnosis of ET was based on the 2016 WHO criteria4. Methods for mutation screening have previously been published; a detailed account of all mutations investigated including their variant allele frequency has previously been published3,5. Conventional statistics was employed to examine the significance of associations, with separate analysis of arterial vs venous thrombosis, occurring at any time before or after formal diagnosis of ET. For the purposes of the current study, only the first events were considered.

Table 1 Clinical and laboratory characteristics of 270 Mayo Clinic patients and 232 University of Florence patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) (total n = 502).

A total of 502 patients (median age 55 years; 41% above age 60; females 59%) who were molecularly annotated for driver mutations as well as other mutations derived from NGS data were followed for a median of 10 years (0.1–34.7). The Mayo/Florence cohorts included 270/232 patients (median age 57/54 years, 60%/59% females) with median follow-up of 9.9/12.9 years (Table 1). Overall driver mutation distribution was 55% JAK2, 27% CALR, 5% MPL, and 13% triple-negative (TN); among 132 CALR-mutated cases, 78 (59%) harbored type-1/like and 54 (41%) type-2/like CALR mutations6. Most frequent mutations, other than JAK2/CALR/MPL, were ASXL1 (7–20%), TET2 (9–11%), DNMT3A (7%), SF3B1 (5%), SRSF2 (2–3%), EZH2 (2–4%), TP53 (2–4%), RUNX1 (1–2%), CBL (1–2%), IDH2 (1%) and U2AF1 (1%). Leukocytosis (≥11 × 109/L) was documented in 22% of patients, extreme thrombocytosis (≥1000 × 109/L) in 27% and abnormal karyotype in 9%. Patients were managed according to conventional strategies including cytoreductive drugs for high-risk disease and antiplatelet therapy for low-risk disease.

History of thrombosis (arterial or venous) before or after diagnosis was documented in 152 (30%) patients and included arterial events in 96 (19%) and venous in 82 (16%). The number of arterial/venous vascular events before and after the time of formal diagnosis were 50 (10%)/3 (1%) and 87 (17%)/76 (15%). In univariate logistic regression analysis the incidence of all thrombotic events (i.e. arterial or venous) occurring before or after diagnosis was significantly associated with driver mutation profile (p < 0.01; JAK2 36%, CALR 20%, MPL 26%, and TN 32%) and the absence of ASXL1 (p = 0.04) or IDH mutations (p = 0.01). A similar analysis restricted to arterial events occurring before or after diagnosis revealed a near-significant association for driver mutation profile (p = 0.2; JAK2 22%, CALR 14%, MPL 22%, and TN 19%) and significant associations for the absence of ASXL1 (p = 0.02) or RUNX1 (p = 0.05) mutations; a similar analysis for venous events marked driver mutation profile (p = 0.03; JAK2 21%, CALR 10%, MPL 15% and TN 13%) and absence of SRSF2 (p = 0.03) or EZH2 (p = 0.02) mutations as being significant. In a subsequent multivariable logistic regression analysis that included age >60 years and leukocytosis (≥11 × 109/L), significance was confirmed for JAK2 vs CALR (p < 0.01), absence of IDH (0.01) or ASXL1 (p = 0.06) mutations, for all thrombosis; JAK2 vs CALR (p < 0.01) and absence of SRSF2 (p = 0.02) or EZH2 (p = 0.03) mutations, for venous thrombosis; and absence of ASXL1 (p = 0.02) or RUNX1 (p = 0.05) mutations for arterial events; of note, in all instances, significant associations were not apparent for either leukocytosis or age >60 years.

Next, in order to mitigate the confounding effect of treatment, we queried for associations with thrombotic events occurring at or before the time of diagnosis; during such analysis, extreme thrombocytosis (≥1000 × 109/L) was also included as variable of interest, based on previous reports of its association with lower risk of arterial thrombosis7 as well as CALR mutations8. In univariate analysis, the following were found to be significantly or near-significantly associated with an increased risk of arterial events: absence of extreme thrombocytosis (p = 0.03; 12% vs 5%), age >60 years (p = 0.04), absence of ASXL1 (p = 0.09), EZH2 (p = 0.08), RUNX1 (p = 0.17) mutations, wild-type ASXL1/RUNX1/EZH2 genotype (p = 0.03; 9% vs 1%), and driver mutation profile (p = 0.09; JAK2 11%, CALR 5%, MPL 19%, and TN 13%); leukocytosis was not significant (p = 0.8); multivariable analysis confirmed significance of wild-type ASXL1/RUNX1/EZH2 genotype (p = 0.03), age >60 years (p = 0.05) and absence of extreme thrombocytosis (p = 0.05), while driver mutation profile was relegated to borderline significance (p = 0.09). A similar analysis for venous events did not reveal any significant association. Finally, for arterial vascular events occurring after diagnosis (i.e. in the context of ongoing anti-thrombotic therapy), logistic regression analysis identified JAK2 vs CALR (p < 0.01) and wild-type ASXL1/RUNX1/EZH2 genotype (p = 0.07) as being significant or near-significant. Cox progression analysis for arterial thrombosis-free survival was feasible in the Mayo Clinic cohort and confirmed the significant unfavorable effect of wild-type ASXL1/RUNX1/EZH2 genotype (p = 0.02), and also identified a previous arterial event as an independent risk factor (p = 0.04).

Figure 1 summarizes our findings in the current study. Our main observations included (i) salutary effect of ASXL1/RUNX1/EZH2 mutations on the risk of arterial thrombosis in ET and (ii) prognostic interaction between extreme thrombocytosis and CALR mutation in influencing the incidence of arterial events at the time of diagnosis. The favorable influence of harboring ASXL1/RUNX1/EZH2 mutations on arterial thrombosis was evident in the context of arterial events occurring both before and after diagnosis. To that effect, it is reasonable to consider the possibility that the infrequent occurrence of high-risk mutations might be a marker for a biologically different disease phenotype, such as occult prefibrotic myelofibrosis9. In a previous report in ET, overall survival was adversely affected by spliceosome (SF3B1, SRSF2) and leukemia-free survival by TP53 mutations3. In a more recent report of young patients with ET, extreme thrombocytosis was independently associated with shortened overall and leukemia-free survival whereas there was no such influence from driver mutations including JAK2 or CALR10.

Fig. 1

Thrombosis risk associations in essential thrombocythemia.

Extreme thrombocytosis in ET has previously been associated with both lower risk of arterial thrombosis7 and CALR mutations8. CALR mutations in ET have also been associated with decreased risk of thrombosis, which in the past has been attributed to the younger age distribution of affected cases11,12. The current study confirms the prothrombotic influence of JAK2, as opposed to CALR mutation13, and suggests that extreme thrombocytosis might also play a part in contributing to the observed decreased risk of arterial thrombosis in CALR-mutated ET. Additional studies are required to confirm these observations, assess their clinical impact, and provide additional insight into the underlying biological mechanisms, which are likely to include the long-recognized, platelet count-dependent, development of acquired von Willebrand syndrome14.


  1. 1.

    Tefferi, A. & Barbui, T. Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am. J. Hematol. 95, 1599–1613 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Szuber, N. et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasms in the young: Mayo Clinic experience with 361 patients age 40 years or younger. Am. J. Hematol. 93, 1474–1484 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tefferi, A. et al. Mutation-enhanced international prognostic systems for essential thrombocythaemia and polycythaemia vera. Br. J. Haematol. 189, 291–302 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Arber, D. A. et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 127, 2391–2405 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tefferi, A. et al. Targeted deep sequencing in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Blood Adv. 1, 21–30 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lasho, T. L., Finke, C. M., Tischer, A., Pardanani, A. & Tefferi, A. Mayo CALR mutation type classification guide using alpha helix propensity. Am. J. Hematol. 93, E128–E129 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Carobbio, A. et al. Risk factors for arterial and venous thrombosis in WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia: an international study of 891 patients. Blood 117, 5857–5859 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tefferi, A. et al. Type 1 versus Type 2 calreticulin mutations in essential thrombocythemia: a collaborative study of 1027 patients. Am. J. Hematol. 89, E121–E124 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Barbui, T. et al. Survival and disease progression in essential thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by accurate morphologic diagnosis: an international study. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 3179–3184 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gangat, N. et al. Young platelet millionaires with essential thrombocythemia. Am. J. Hematol. (2021).

  11. 11.

    Finazzi, G. et al. Calreticulin mutation does not modify the IPSET score for predicting the risk of thrombosis among 1150 patients with essential thrombocythemia. Blood 124, 2611–2612 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gangat, N. et al. Mutations and thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia: prognostic interaction with age and thrombosis history. Eur. J. Haematol. 94, 31–36 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Barbui, T. Refining prognostication of thrombosis in ET. Am. J. Hematol. 91, 361–363 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Michiels, J. J. et al. The paradox of platelet activation and impaired function: platelet-von Willebrand factor interactions, and the etiology of thrombotic and hemorrhagic manifestations in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 32, 589–604 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayalew Tefferi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guglielmelli, P., Gangat, N., Coltro, G. et al. Mutations and thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia. Blood Cancer J. 11, 77 (2021).

Download citation


Quick links