Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A multistate model of survival prediction and event monitoring in prefibrotic myelofibrosis


Among 382 patients with WHO-defined prefibrotic myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) followed for a median of 6.9 years, fibrotic or leukemic transformation or death accounts for 15, 7, and 27% of cases, respectively. A multistate model was applied to analyze survival data taking into account intermediate states that are part of the clinical course of pre-PMF, including overt PMF and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Within this multistate framework, multivariable models disclosed older age (>65 years) and leukocytosis (>15 × 109/L) as predictors of death and leukemic transformation. The risk factors for fibrotic progression included anemia and grade 1 bone marrow fibrosis. The outcome was further affected by high molecular risk (HMR) but not driver mutations. Direct transition to overt PMF, AML, or death occurred in 15.2, 4.7, and 17.3% of patients, respectively. The risk of AML was the highest in the first 5 years (7%), but leveled off thereafter. Conversely, the probability of death from overt PMF or AML increased more rapidly over time, especially when compared to death in the pre-PMF state without disease progression. The probability of being alive with pre-PMF status decreased to 70 and 30% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. This study highlights the aspects of the clinical course and estimates of disease progression in pre-PMF.


Diagnostic criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO)1,2 highlight the clinical relevance of distinguishing prefibrotic/early-stage primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) from both overtly fibrotic PMF and essential thrombocythemia (ET)3,4,5,6,7,8,9. The presenting clinical picture of pre-PMF is heterogeneous ranging from isolated thrombocytosis to systemic manifestation resembling overt PMF. Pre-PMF displays a progressive clinical course with development of anemia, enlarging spleen size, worsening of constitutional symptoms, increased grades of bone marrow (BM) fibrosis, and emergence of high-risk cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities; accordingly, pre- and overt PMF are assumed to represent a phenotypic continuum10.

This paper focuses on the rates of disease progression in pre-PMF taking into account the different phases of disease in its clinical course. To that effect, we considered 382 patients with pre-PMF diagnosed according to WHO criteria: we aimed (i) to evaluate transition estimates between the initial state of pre-PMF and the absorbing state, i.e., death, through the intermediate-state passages, (ii) to search prognostic factors predicting the transition of patients through different clinical conditions.

Patients and methods


This study collected retrospective data in 382 patients from four different tertiary Italian centers with large experience regarding myeloproliferative neoplasms, after the approval of all institutional ethical committees (first approval of the coordinating center Papa Giovanni XXIII’s Hospital, n.208-18) and informed consent of participants, according to the mandates of the Helsinki declaration.

Patients’ eligibility criteria included the revised 2016 WHO criteria1 until December 31, 2017, together with genotypes for JAK2V617F, MPLW515L/K, and CALR mutations. In a subgroup of patients (n = 132) referred to a single center participating in this study, high molecular-risk (HMR) mutations, i.e., ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2, and IDH1/2, were also analyzed; a HMR category was defined by the presence of at least one mutation11. The median duration of follow-up was 6.89 years (range 0.08–32.6).

Diagnosis of progression to overt PMF was established by the corresponding clinical features. The latter included worsening of anemia, increase in splenomegaly, and/or overt leukoerythroblastosis consistent with advanced PMF with myeloid metaplasia. Transformation to AML met criteria (20% blasts) in agreement with the WHO classification1,2.

Statistical methods

A multistate model was applied to analyze data of survival, taking into account intermediate states that are part of the clinical course of pre-PMF, where patients may transit through evolution to overt PMF and/or AML (transient states) before death (absorbing state). The outline description of the adopted model is represented in Fig. 1. A parametric Markov multistate survival model was applied, according to the approach proposed by Crowther et al.12.

Fig. 1: Outline of the multistate model of transition to overt PMF, AML, or death.

Trans transition, AML acute myeloid leukemia, PMF primary myelofibrosis. The figure shows the 4-state model for the clinical course of pre-PMF patients. The four states, graphed by boxes, are (1) diagnosis of pre-PMF, (2) evolution into overt PMF, (3) evolution into AML, and (4) death. In each box is quoted the number of patients starting (left) and ending (right) in the state. Across states, the following six transitions (graphed by arrows) are possible: from pre- to overt PMF (trans.1), from pre-PMF to AML (trans. 2), from pre-PMF to death (trans. 3), from overt PMF to AML (trans. 4), from overt PMF to death (trans. 5), and from AML to death (trans. 6). On each arrow is quoted the number of patients involved in the corresponding transition.

Within this multistate framework, in order to investigate risk factors for each specific transition between two states, different multivariable Cox regression models assuming a Weibull distribution of the baseline hazard, were performed for clinical and mutational covariates separately. Performances obtained by both models were then compared by values of the Akaike’s information criterion (AIC)13,14.


Patient characteristics

A total of 382 patients with WHO-defined pre-PMF were included in this study; their clinical and hematologic characteristics at diagnosis are reported in Table 1. Median age was 57.6 years, 45% were above the age of 60; 51% were male. Generic cardiovascular risk factors for thrombosis were present in 45% of cases. Of note, grade 1 BM reticulin fibrosis was found in 58% of patients and palpable splenomegaly >5 cm in 15%. Forty percent of patients displayed LDH values that were >1.5 times the upper limit of normal, whereas 15% of informative patients displayed an abnormal karyotype.

Table 1 Clinical and mutational characteristics of 382 pre-PMF patients.

The distribution of driver mutations was as follows: JAK2V617F in 65%, MPLW515L/K 4.5%, CALR type1 16.5%, CALR type2 6%, and triple negativity in 31 patients (8%). A total of 132 patients (35%) were screened for other additional mutations: HMR mutations were found in 28%, and ASXL1 was the most frequent. Patients were classified as HMR for the presence of one (28%) or more than one (8%) mutation. Overall, 239 patients (77%) received cytoreductive treatment (hydroxyurea in 68%), antiplatelet agent in 72%, and oral anticoagulants and/or heparin in 15%.

Multistate model for death and disease progression in pre-PMF

This model is composed of four states (pre-, overt PMF, AML, and death) and six possible transitions between states. Figure 1 illustrates each transition, as well as the number of patients starting and ending in each disease state. All patients begin in the initial pre-PMF state (n = 382), and then they can move directly to overt PMF (transition 1, n = 58), AML (transition 2, n = 18), or death (transition 3, n = 66). The remaining three transitions describe the movement of patients from an intermediate to the next (or final) state. In detail, patients who previously evolved into overt PMF, can progress to AML (transition 4, n = 10) or death (transition 5, n = 14); conversely, the only possible transition from AML is to death (transition 6, n = 25).

At the end of the study follow-up (median 6.89 years, range 0.08–32.6), 240 (63%) patients with pre-PMF remained alive and event free in the initial status; 34 (9%) and 3 (1%) patients of the initial pre-PMF cases, who progressed to overt PMF and AML, respectively, were alive, and 105 (27%) patients had died.

Transition and state occupation probabilities

Given the present 4-state model, six transition probabilities from a state to the other were possible (Fig. 2). The probability to transition from pre- to overt PMF, AML, and death accounted for 15.2, 4.7, and 17.3% of the 382 initial cases (Fig. 2, panels 1, 2, and 3, respectively). In panels 4–6, the probability of further transition of patients who had occupied an intermediate state is presented. The evolution into AML from a state of overt PMF was the highest in the first 5 years (around 7%), but then leveled off at <1% (panel 4). Conversely, the probability of death after an overt PMF or leukemic progression (panels 5 and 6, respectively) increased much more rapidly over time, especially when compared to the probability to die from a pre-PMF state without disease progression (panel 3).

Fig. 2: Transition probabilities over time from pre- to overt PMF, AML, and death (1, 2, and 3), from overt PMF to AML and death (4 and 5), and from AML to death (6).

Trans transition, AML acute myeloid leukemia, PMF primary myelofibrosis. This figure shows the six transition probabilities of the multistate model for the clinical course of pre-PMF. Transition probabilities are defined as the probability of going from a given state to the next state in a Markov process. Direct transitions (panels 1–3) refer to all the 382 patients initially at risk (the pre-PMF state); thus, they represent the probability that a patient with a pre-PMF can directly evolve into overt PMF or AML or die. Panels 4–6 show the probabilities of indirect transitions, calculated starting from the corresponding previous intermediate state.

The time duration of state occupation, reported in the stacked plot of Fig. 3, gradually decreased over time for patients with pre-PMF with an approximately linear trend; 70% and 30% of these patients remained event free after 10–20 years, respectively; in the same period, the probability of death increased from 30% to 60% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. State occupation probabilities for intermediate states (overt PMF and AML, considered together) gradually increased over time and remained relatively stable (20–22%) after 5–10 years.

Fig. 3: Stacked plot of state occupation probabilities of being alive, free from evolution, being alive with overt PMF, alive with AML, or having died as a function of time since diagnosis of pre-PMF (years).

AML acute myeloid leukemia, PMF primary myelofibrosis. The figure shows the state occupation probabilities, which are the probability of being in a state at a certain time. The stacked presentation allows to compare the four different probabilities simultaneously. At time 0 (pre-PMF diagnosis), the probability of being alive and free from evolution is 100%. During the course of the disease, this probability gradually decreases in favor of other state occupations. In particular, the probability of intermediate-state occupation is very low for AML (1–2%) and higher for overt PMF (15–20%). The probability of being in the final state (death) increases much more rapidly from 10 years after pre-PMF diagnosis, to reach around 60% at 20 years.

Prognostic factors predicting direct transitions to overt PMF, AML, and death

We searched for prognostic factors for transitions 1, 2, and 3 (the direct pathway from pre-PMF to evolution to overt PMF, AML, and death, respectively). Estimates of covariate effects in each transition-specific model are reported in Table 2. Clinical covariates, including sex, age, blood values, fibrosis grade, spleen size, LDH, and abnormal cytogenetics, also corrected for therapy, were considered in the first model, whereas the prognostic value of mutational findings (driver as well as other mutations) was separately evaluated as the latter were available in only a fraction of the entire population (n = 132 out of 382 patients).

Table 2 Covariate effect in each transition-specific model.

Independent significant clinical variables associated with the transition from pre- to overt PMF were grade 1 BM reticulin fibrosis (HR = 3.20, P = 0.035) and anemia (HR = 2.18, P = 0.047). Variables associated with the transition into AML were age >65 years (HR = 10.3, P = 0.002), leukocytosis defined as white blood cell (WBC) count > 15 × 109/L (HR = 4.80, P = 0.025), LDH ratio > 1.5 times the upper normal value (HR = 8.13, P = 0.017), and cytogenetic abnormalities (HR = 6.92, p = 0.009). Finally, transition to death was associated with age >65 years (HR = 6.53, P < 0.0001) and leukocytosis of >15 × 109/L (HR = 3.49, P = 0.010).

Concerning models including mutational status, the presence of one or more HMR mutations was the only factor significantly associated with an increased risk of transition from pre- to overt PMF (HR = 3.15, P = 0.036), AML (HR = 6.62, P = 0.036), and death (HR = 4.62, P < 0.0001).

The Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) was then calculated for both clinical and mutational models in order to compare their prognostic performance across the 3 direct transitions (Fig. 4). Superimposable values of AIC were obtained for transitions 2 and 3 (to AML and death, respectively) (Fig. 4). On the contrary, a better prognostic value of transformation from the pre- to overt PMF status was found for the model including HMR mutations, where AIC was lower (AIC = 112) for the mutational model in comparison to the model considering only clinical covariates (AIC = 233).

Fig. 4: Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) of clinical and mutational models for direct transitions.

Trans transition, AML acute myeloid leukemia, PMF primary myelofibrosis. The figure compares the prognostic performance of clinical and mutational models for the prediction of the 3 direct transitions (overt PMF, AML, or death) by their AIC values. The lowest AIC corresponds to better performance.


This study outlines both estimates of the probability of transition from one state to another and risk factors affecting the transition of pre- to overt PMF, AML, and death.

Transformation to overt PMF

This transformation occurred in 15.2% of subjects overall, over a median follow-up of nearly 7 years. This evolution pattern is in general agreement with previous observations, provided the different methods of selection from filed material were taken into account4,6,7,8,15. A bias might occur if reclassification is focused either on patients presenting with essential thrombocythemia (ET) or PMF. Consequently, cohorts with a more “ET-like phenotype” (higher platelet counts > 450 × 109/L, lower LDH levels, splenomegaly < 5 cm, and fewer peripheral blasts) versus groups with a more “PMF-like phenotype” (lower platelet counts, higher LDH levels, more pronounced splenomegaly, and higher peripheral blood%) may be recognized16. In two studies investigating explicitly patients presenting with the original diagnosis of ET that were later reclassified by applying the WHO criteria1,2 as pre-PMF with thrombocythemia, comparable risk rates were revealed. The first study4 reported a cumulative incidence of overt PMF at 10 years of 12.3% and the other8 of 9.7%. As could be expected by the corresponding clinical data, higher-frequency rates of pre-PMF than in ET-like phenotypes were found when selecting from a cohort with the former diagnosis of PMF6. Moreover, our results from this multistate analysis should be considered more reliable since they take into account the effects of the competing absorbing states of death and direct AML evolution. Two independent clinical prognostic risk factors were identified to predict evolution into overt PMF, i.e., anemia (hemoglobin less than 12 g/dL for females and 13 g/dL for males) and grade 1 BM reticulin fibrosis17. In addition, whereas driver mutations showed no association with transition to overt PMF, the presence of at least one of HMR mutations (ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2, and IDH1/2) was independently associated with this event.

Transformation to AML

In prefibrotic PMF, several groups have reported variable frequencies concerning 10-year cumulative incidences of AML, ranging from 2.38, 5.84, and 12%6. In this context, it is important to show that evolution from pre-PMF to AML may follow two different pathways, as shown in Fig. 1: one direct (64% of cases) and one preceded by an intermediary state of overt PMF (36% of cases). In the direct pathway, the probability to appreciate the occurrence of evolution into AML is fairly stable up to 10 years (Fig. 2), and increases afterward. Conversely, in the indirect pathway, i.e., once myelofibrotic evolution has occurred, evolution in AML is more likely to happen in the first 10 years and decreases afterward. This is not surprising, as it is expected that the probability of AML is higher in overt PMF; yet, roughly two-thirds of transformations do not pass through overt PMF, a fact that should not be underestimated in clinical practice.

Clinical and mutational risk factors were found to affect direct transformation from pre-PMF to AML. Patients aged 65 or more, leukocytosis (WBC > 15 × 109/L), LDH ratio > 1.5, and cytogenetic abnormalities were independently associated with AML evolution. The presence of this pattern calls for careful initial evaluation of this subcategory of patients since diagnosis, as well as for continuous monitoring. While the prognostic value of driver mutations was limited, the risk of AML transition was higher in patients with at least one HMR mutation (i.e., ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2, and IDH1/2) and further increased with two or more such mutations.


Over a median follow-up of approximately 7 years, 105 deaths were registered, corresponding to 27% of the study population (n = 382). While conventional statistical analysis produces estimates of survival by considering directly the final event, such as death, the multistate model provides a more reliable estimate of survival since it involves in the calculation the intermediate states (PMF and AML) as well. For example, we would not know, by standard Kaplan–Meier survival analysis alone, whether these deceased patients were blastic or fibrotic at the time of death. This model allowed us to separate the influence of AML and overt PMF from mortality related to stable pre-PMF alone. Our analysis showed that, while mortality is higher after disease progression, as expected, in absolute terms, the greatest part of deaths happens in progression-free patients (64%). This mortality appears to be excessive for patients of that age, and is most likely accounted for by some independent prognostic factors, the most relevant ones being leukocytosis and the presence of at least one HMR mutation. We stress that leukocytosis, in our model, is a risk factor for death independently from its known effect on disease progression.


We acknowledge that our work has some limitations. In particular, in the analysis of prognostic factors, mutational and clinical risk factors were assessed separately and not together as they should have been. This was due to the limited number of patients in whom information on HMR mutations was available (only a third of the study population was informative in that regard). This prevents the possibility of developing a full-fledged prognostic score to differentiate the risks in subgroups of patients. However, in addition to demonstrating also with our multistate model that driver mutations do not influence transitions from pre-PMF to other states, our results highlight an adverse prognostic role of HMR mutations, confirming previous observations. We also specified that comparisons of AIC between the mutational and clinical model were in favor of the mutational model only for transformation to overt PMF, whereas for the other transitions, AIC was basically superimposable.

In conclusion, besides providing epidemiological estimates of the probability of transition from one disease phase to another, in patients with pre-PMF, this study traces the clinical course of the disease, allowing prognostication of the most likely path in each patient, and facilitates a more appropriate therapy decision-making.


  1. 1.

    Vardiman, J. W. et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood 114, 937–951 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Arber, D. A. et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood 127, 2391–2405 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gisslinger, H. Pre-PMF emerging as important subgroup of MPN. Blood 129, 3142–3144 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Barbui, T. et al. Survival and disease progression in essential thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by accurate morphologic diagnosis: an international study. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 3179–3184 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Thiele, J. et al. Essential thrombocythemia versus early primary myelofibrosis: a multicenter study to validate the WHO classification. Blood 117, 5710–5757 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Guglielmelli, P. et al. Presentation and outcome of patients with 2016 WHO diagnosis of prefibrotic and overt primary myelofibrosis. Blood 129, 3227–3236 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jeryczynski, G. et al. Pre-fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis vs. WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia: the impact of minor clinical diagnostic criteria on the outcome of the disease. Am. J. Hematol. 92, 885–891 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rumi, E. et al. Clinical course and outcome of essential thrombocythemia and prefibrotic myelofibrosis according to the revised WHO 2016 diagnostic criteria. Oncotarget 8, 101735 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kamiunten, A. et al. Early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis in patients who were initially diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia. Int. J. Hematol. 108, 411–415 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Barosi, G. et al. Evidence that prefibrotic myelofibrosis is aligned along a clinical and biological continuum featuring primary myelofibrosis. PLoS ONE 7, e35631 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vannucchi, A. M. et al. Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia 27, 1861–1869 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Crowther, M. J. & Lambert, P. C. Parametric multistate survival models: flexible modelling allowing transition-specific distributions with application to estimating clinically useful measures of effect differences. Stat. Med. 36, 4719–4742 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Akaike, H. On newer statistical approaches to parameter estimation and structure determination. Proc. IFAC World Congress 3, 1877–1884 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Akaike, H. Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J. Econom. 16, 3–14 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Barbui, T. et al. The 2016 WHO classification and diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms: document summary and in-depth discussion. Blood Cancer J. 8, 15 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Finazzi, G., Vannucchi, A. M. & Barbui, T. Prefibrotic myelofibrosis: treatment algorithm. Blood Cancer J. 8, 104 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Thiele, J. et al. European consensus on grading bone marrow fibrosis and assessment of cellularity. Haematologica 90, 1128–1132 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The study was sponsored by Fondazione per la Ricerca Ospedale di Bergamo (FROM) (ethical committee approval number: 208-18). This work was supported by AIRC 5 × 1000 call “Metastatic disease: the key unmet need in oncology” to MYNERVA project, #21267 (MYeloid NEoplasms Research Venture AIRC). A detailed description of the MYNERVA project is available at We acknowledge Alberto Ferrari for the support in writing the paper.

Author information




A.C., V.D.S., A.R., J.T., A.M.V., A.T., and T.B. revised the study and contributed to the paper writing. P.G., E.R., C.C., S.B., and M.C.F. collected the data. All authors revised and approved the final version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiziano Barbui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carobbio, A., Guglielmelli, P., Rumi, E. et al. A multistate model of survival prediction and event monitoring in prefibrotic myelofibrosis. Blood Cancer J. 10, 100 (2020).

Download citation


Quick links