By Jasmine Murphy, Fiona Andrews and Maria Morgan
Introduction
This series on neurodiversity-informed dentistry is intended for all members of the dental team, aiming to promote a more accessible and inclusive culture where neurodivergence is understood, accepted, and destigmatised for the benefit of neurominority patients and staff. This second article introduces important considerations that may impact on the oral health status of neurominority patients. If you are joining this series for the first time, please visit article one for a general introduction to neurodiversity (https://go.nature.com/3JpieH5).
Further articles in the series will cover reasonable adjustments which can be made for patients, the increased vulnerability to trauma, intersectionality, as well as considering the impact of the workplace and educational settings on neurominority staff and students. These articles also take direction from Bruggermann1 to move away from person-first language eg 'people with ADHD', and instead use identify-first language, such as 'ADHD people' as it has been reported there is wider preference for this, for it shows allegiance and pride in disability or neurodiverse culture.
Brief recap
Neurodiversity is short for neurological diversity. It refers to the biological fact that brains are unique and have many different ways in how they process information and interact with environments. The totality of oral health research suggests that there are higher levels of unmet dental needs across multiple forms of neurodiversity.2
Although some neurominorities can find toothbrushing and flossing challenging due to reduced dexterity,3 this article discusses how executive functioning, sensory processing, and oral health literacy may impact on oral health outcomes for neurominorities.
Executive functioning
'Difficulties in executive functions can increase the odds of developing dental caries in neurominorities, independent of socio-economic status.'4,5
Executive functioning (EF) is a term used to describe the part of the brain that manages the skills we need to complete tasks in our daily lives.6,7,8 In short, EF is the management system of the brain. It involves three major types of brain functions (flexible thinking, working memory and self-control) which are responsible for a set of skills that are necessary for independence and self-sufficiency.9,10,11,12,13
Executive function
See Figure 1.
Most neurominorities tend to have distinct differences in EF compared to the neurotypical (general) population. Studies have demonstrated that when EF is affected, health-enhancing intentions can fail.14,15,16 It can also be more difficult to override impulses that engage with health damaging behaviour.10,17 In the context of oral health, EF differences can therefore impact on making healthy lifestyle choices (this would include choices relating to tobacco, alcohol, substance use, diet), undertaking self-care (including oral hygiene) and attending dental appointments. A 'better' performance of EF (symbolic of neurotypical functioning) has been reported as a protective factor against dental caries.18,19 It is therefore important to understand and recognise when an individual is struggling with EF (Fig. 2).
Sensory processing
'Some neurominorities can find toothbrushing difficult due to sensory processing difficulties.'20
Sensory processing (SP) is a subconscious and automatic neurological process in receiving and responding to sensations. For the majority of people, most sensory input is filtered by the brain in order for selected information to reach their conscious awareness. For those with SP differences, the brain can find it challenging to filter input to the extent that it can be distracting and potentially confusing. Certain noises, lights, tastes, movements, positions, touch and/or smells can be experienced as painful or even be regarded as a threat. This, in turn can cause a person to become easily overwhelmed. In a dental setting, such patients could be harshly labelled as being non-compliant, uncooperative, or even challenging.
Individuals with SP differences fall into two main categories, hyposensitivity and hypersensitivity (Fig. 3).
Current estimates indicate that 5% to 16.5% of the general population have some issues associated with SP challenges.21,22 These estimates are disproportionately higher for neurominorities, particularly autistic23 and ADHD people.24 In the context of oral health, just like EF, SP issues can also affect lifestyle choices, undertaking self-care (including oral hygiene), attending dental appointments as well as receiving dental treatment or instructions. It is therefore important to understand and recognise when an individual is affected by SP differences.
SP differences for those who are hyposensitive may not be as apparent. For those with hyposensitivity, oral hygiene measures could lead to dental abrasion (by needing to use harder pressure when toothbrushing), or dietary preferences could cause dental erosion and/or dental caries (by the need for intense flavours which are highly acidic or sweet). These are examples and do not present an exhaustive list.
Issues with SP hypersensitivity may be encountered in the home environment, where it could have a direct impact on how oral hygiene measures are undertaken. It is reportedly quite common for those with SP hypersensitivity to go for days, weeks or even years without appropriate oral hygiene,21 as they may struggle with the sensation of toothbrushing and/or flossing, the taste, smell and/or texture of toothpaste as well as sounds/noises that toothbrushing makes. Dietary choices may also be affected as some may have very limited dietary preferences due to olfactory (relating to smell) and gustatory (relating to taste and texture) differences. The dental environment can also cause sensory overload. This increases stress and anxiety and serves to create barriers for communication and engagement with the dental team. As a result, some neurominorities can become isolated and choose not to access dental care because they find the dental environment too challenging.3,20,25,26 Some examples are below.
Visual sensations that could be challenging at a dental practice:
-
1.
Busy reception and waiting room
-
2.
Sudden movements of people or hand gestures
-
3.
Bright, flashing/blinking and/or glaring lighting
-
4.
Reflective and/or shiny surfaces
-
5.
Bright colours, busy décor and cluttered workspaces.
Hearing sensations that could be challenging at a dental practice:
-
1.
Noisy reception and waiting room
-
2.
Music, TV, children playing with toys, phones ringing
-
3.
Humming or buzzing of fluorescent lights
-
4.
Sporadic loud sounds, such as dental hand pieces
-
5.
Contact noise of dental instruments as they are retrieved and returned.
Touch sensations, position and movement of the body, as well as those affecting balance that could be challenging at a dental practice:
-
1.
Sitting in the dental chair
-
2.
Placing instruments in the mouth
-
3.
Percussion of teeth
-
4.
Feather-like or very light touches
-
5.
Going back suddenly in the dental chair.
Smell and taste sensations that could be challenging at a dental practice:
-
1.
Cleaning and disinfectant fluids
-
2.
Materials used during dental treatment
-
3.
Clothing detergents used by dental team
-
4.
Fluoride varnish
-
5.
Mouth rinses.
Oral health literacy
'Oral health literacy is a critical concept in our efforts to reduce oral health inequalities.'27
Health literacy (including oral health literacy) and functional literacy are not the same, but they are related. Functional literacy is about personal skills to read, write, calculate, speak, and comprehend information in order to participate in society. Oral health literacy (OHL) is the extent to which individuals are able to obtain, process and understand oral health information, as well as to navigate health/dental services, in order to make appropriate decisions to support their oral health.28,29
A person could therefore have a good level of functional literacy but could also struggle to comprehend health information they are receiving ie, have a lower level of oral health literacy. This does not mean that they lack intelligence, but rather the information is not being communicated in a manner/method/format that is suitable for them to process and understand. Patients cannot engage with information if they cannot understand it. This can happen to anyone, and is not specific to neurominorities.
The dental team should be aware that whilst some neurominorities have received a diagnosis, many are undiagnosed and not even aware of their neurodiversity.
For neurominorities, the ability to process information can be further negatively affected by their neurodiversity, EF, and SP differences. For example, if the dental environment is causing sensory overload, they are unlikely to be able to process oral health instructions or advice. Those with EF differences may find it difficult to process information due to distractions in the dental environment making it difficult for them to maintain focus or attention. Dyslexia or dyscalculia could cause further difficulties in processing oral health and/or any associated financial information. Dental websites could also cause an issue for those with SP differences due to colour contrasts, schemes, or patterns, as well as busy web pages with lots of text and/or too many graphics. This can make reading and processing on-screen information difficult, creating a barrier. Similar issues can be faced with oral health leaflets.
Neurodiversity-informed dentistry
'Neurodiversity-informed dentistry is about a more accessible and inclusive culture where neurodivergence is understood, accepted, and destigmatised for the benefit of dental patients and all those working within or seeking to join the dental profession' (from part 1 in this series https://go.nature.com/3JpieH5).
The dental team should be aware that whilst some neurominorities have received a diagnosis, many are undiagnosed and not even aware of their neurodiversity. Neurodiverse conditions can therefore be a completely hidden disability causing sufficient impairment, particularly with regards to executive functioning (EF), sensory processing (SP) and oral health literacy (OHL). It is acknowledged that anyone can face EF, SP and OHL challenges. However, neurominorities are disproportionately affected and their struggles are of a higher intensity, magnitude, and severity than the general (neurotypical) population. Furthermore, as some neurominorities may appear to 'communicate well' or may be from highly professional backgrounds, their neurodiversity may go unnoticed with their needs not being identified or met. This makes it all the more important for dental settings to create neuro-inclusive spaces for all patients to be able to benefit from good oral health.
Next in the series
There are many simple adjustments that can be considered to support neurominority patients. The next article in the series will look at suggested solutions in supporting neurominority patients in gaining improved oral health.
References
Brueggemann B J. Disability studies/disability culture. In Wehmeyer M L (Editor). The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability. Oxford Library of Psychology. pp 279-299. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Andrews F. An integrative review to explore the facilitators of oral health behaviours and access to dental services for adults in the UK with Applied and Clinical Neurodiverse Profiles. Under review, 2022.
Bradshaw P, Pellicano E, van Driel M, Urbanowicz A. How can we support the healthcare needs of autistic adults without intellectual disability? Current Developmental Disorders Reports 2019; 6: 45-56.
Dourado M R, Andrade P M, Ramos-Jorge M L, Moreira R N, Oliveira-Ferreira F. Association between executive/attentional functions and caries in children with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil 2013; 34: 2493-2499.
Mota-Veloso I, Pordeus I A, Homem M A et al. Do signs of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder increase the odds of dental caries? A case-control study. Caries Res 2018; 52: 212-219.
Belsky G. What is executive function? Understood, 2019. Available at: https://www.understood.org/en/articles/what-is-executive-function (accessed May 2023).
Low K. What is executive function? Verywell Mind, 27 September 2020. Available at: https://www.verywellmind.com/what-are-executive-functions-20463 (accessed May 2023).
Royall D R, Lauterbach E C, Cummings J L et al. Executive control function: a review of its promise and challenges for clinical research. A report from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2002; 14: 377-405.
Schmeichel B J. Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control. J Exp Psychol Gen 2007; 136: 241-255.
Williams P G, Thayer J F. Executive functioning and health: introduction to the special series. Ann Behav Med 2009; 372: 101-105.
Williams P G, Suchy Y, Rau H K. Individual differences in executive functioning: implications for stress regulation. Ann Behav Med 2009; 37: 126-140.
Raio C M, Orederu T A, Palazzolo L, Shurick A A, Phelps E A. Cognitive emotion regulation fails the stress test. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 15139-15144.
Shields G S, Kuchenbecker S Y, Pressman S D, Sumida K D, Slavich G M. Better cognitive control of emotional information is associated with reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine reactivity to emotional stress. Stress 2016; 19: 63-68.
Allan J L, Johnston M, Campbell N. Unintentional eating. What determines goal-incongruent chocolate consumption? Appetite 2010; 54: 422-425.
Allan J L, Johnston M, Campbell N. Missed by an inch or a mile? Predicting the size of intention-behaviour gap from measures of executive control. Psychol Health 2011; 26: 635-650.
Williams P G, Tinajero R, Suchy Y. Executive functioning and health. In: Oxford Handbook Topics in Psychology. Oxford University Press, 2017.
Hall P A, Elias L J, Fong G T, Harrison A H, Borowsky R, Sarty G E. A social neuroscience perspective on physical activity. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2008; 30: 432-449.
Mota-Veloso I, Ramos-Jorge M L, Homem M A, Pordeus I A, Paiva S M, Oliveira-Ferreira F. Dental caries in schoolchildren: influence of inattention, hyperactivity and executive functions. Braz Oral Res 2018; doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0052.
Friedlander A H, Yagiela J A, Mahler M E, Rubin R. The pathophysiology, medical management and dental implications of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 475-482.
Stein L I, Lane C J, Williams M E, Dawson M E, Polido J C, Cermak S A. Physiological and behavioral stress and anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorders during routine oral care. Biomed Res Int 2014; doi: 10.1155/2014/694876.
Ben-Sasson A, Hen L, Fluss R, Cermak S A, Engel-Yeger B, Gal E. A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2009; 39: 1-11.
Ahn R R, Miller L J, Milberger S, McIntosh D N. Prevalence of parents' perceptions of sensory processing disorders among kindergarten children. Am J Occup Ther 2004; 58: 287-293.
Tomchek S D, Dunn W. Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the short sensory profile. Am J Occup Ther 2007; 61: 190-200.
Lane S, Reynolds S, Thacker L. Sensory over-responsivity and ADHD: differentiating using electrodermal responses, cortisol, and anxiety. Front Integr Neurosci 2010; doi: 10.3389/fnint.2010.00008.
Sharpe R A, Curry W, Brown R, Shankar R. A public health approach to reducing health inequalities among adults with autism. Br J Gen Pract 2019; 69: 534-535.
Samuel B, Jacqui R, Barry I et al. The importance and availability of adjustments to improve access for autistic adults who need mental and physical healthcare: findings from UK surveys. BMJ Open 2021; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043336.
Horowitz A M, Kleinman D V. Oral health literacy: a pathway to reducing oral health disparities in Maryland. J Public Health Dent 2012; 72 Suppl 1: S26-S30.
Bridges S M, Parthasarathy D S, Au T K, Wong H M, Yiu C K, McGrath C P. Development of functional oral health literacy assessment instruments: application of literacy and cognitive theories. J Public Health Dent 2014; 74: 110-119.
Neves É T B, Lima L C M, da Costa Dutra L et al. Oral health literacy, sociodemographic, family, and clinical predictors of dental visits among Brazilian early adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent 2021; 31: 204-211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, J., Andrews, F. & Morgan, M. Embracing neurodiversity-informed dentistry. Part two: Oral health considerations. BDJ Team 10, 18–21 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41407-023-1864-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41407-023-1864-8