Abstract
Some patients are unable to tolerate dental procedures without a form of pharmacological intervention, whether it be via conscious sedation or general anaesthesia. Hypnotherapy understandably raises eyebrows, as many imagine the scene where a stage hypnotherapist makes subjects carry out comical acts in front of a rapturous audience, so in a clinical context, it is clear to see why many perceive it with scepticism. Current options in terms of behavioural management include, well known techniques such as distraction, positive reinforcement, memory restructuring, modelling and systematic desensitisation. A rarely explored alternative is clinical hypnosis, which can be employed with minimal risks or side effects. Clinical hypnosis aims to investigate and manage the underlying aetiology of the need for behavioural or pharmacological management, regardless of the identified cause, rather than moving directly to pharmacologically led management, which often leads to dependency on the chosen technique. The author's aim is to explore the correlation between these differing treatment modalities and to assess whether hypnosis as a stand-alone technique can be employed successfully or utilised in a combination technique, 'hypnosedation'.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
The First Five Years, London: General Dental Council: 2002 :101-105
Standards for Conscious Sedation in the Provision of Dental Care: The dental faculties of the Royal Colleges of surgeons and the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Report of the Intercollegiate Advisory Committee for Sedation in Dentistry. London 2015.
Kirsch I, Montgomery G, Sapirstein. Hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive behavioural psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995; 63: 214-220.
Kroger & Fezler. Hypnosis and Behaviour Modification 1976; 74.
Fabian T K. Comparative evaluation of 45 cases of hypnosis. Hypnosis in dentistry 1995; 88: 111-115.
Eitner S, Wichmann M, Paulsen A, Holst S: Changes in neurophysiologic parameters in a patient with dental anxiety by hypnosis during surgical treatment. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 496-500.
Royal College of Surgeons: Behaviour Management: Online information available from https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/fds/publications-clinicalguidelines/clinical,guidelines/documents/non_ph_behaviour_mgmt.pdf (Accessed May 2019).
Gow M A. Internal sinus lift and placement of an osseointegrated implant using hypnosis as the sole method of pain control, a first in dental practice. Implant Dentistry Today 2008; 2: 31-37.
Lynn S J, Irving Kirsch. Essentials of clinical hypnosis. An evidence-based approach. American Psychological Association 2006; 55: 167-88
Wolley et al. Hypnosis alternative, or complimentary to conscious sedation in dentistry? A review. J Dis Oral H 2006; 7: 161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ravalia, M. Can Clinical hypnotherapy be used as an adjunct or an alternative to conscious sedation in dentistry?. BDJ In Pract 32, 23–24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41404-019-0072-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41404-019-0072-x