Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Synaptic and cellular plasticity in Parkinson’s disease

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease, which causes a tremendous socioeconomic burden. PD patients are suffering from debilitating motor and nonmotor symptoms. Cardinal motor symptoms of PD, including akinesia, bradykinesia, resting tremor, and rigidity, are caused by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. In addition, decreased amounts of dopamine (DA) level in the basal ganglia induces numerous adaptive changes at the cellular and synaptic levels in the basal ganglia circuits. These cellular and synaptic adaptations are believed to underlie the emergence and propagation of correlated, rhythmic pattern of activity throughout the interconnected cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical network. The widespread pathological pattern of brain activity is closely linked to the devastating motor symptoms of PD. Accumulating evidence suggests that both dopaminergic degeneration and the associated abnormal cellular and circuit activity in the basal ganglia drive the motor symptoms of PD. In this short review I summarize the recent advances in our understanding of synaptic and cellular alterations in two basal ganglia nuclei (i.e. the striatum and the subthalamic nucleus) following a complete loss of DA, and in our conceptual understanding of the cellular and circuit bases for the pathological pattern of brain activity in parkinsonian state.

Introduction

The basal ganglia are a group of interconnected subcortical brain regions that transform cerebral cortical activity into common behaviors [1]. The basal ganglia are important for a variety of brain functions and behaviors, such as action selection, habit formation, cognition, and motor control [1,2,3]. In mammals, the basal ganglia comprise the striatum, the external and internal segments of the globus pallidus (GPe and GPi), the subthalamic nucleus (STN), and the substantial nigra pars compacta and reticulata (SNc and SNr). The striatum and the STN are two input stations of the basal ganglia, and they receive topographically organized excitatory inputs from the cerebral cortex and thalamus; the SNr and the GPi are the major outputs of the basal ganglia, transmitting processed information to downstream motor regions (Fig. 1a), including the thalamic nuclei, which are responsible for the planning and execution of skilled movements, the pedunculopontine, which is important for the regulation of locomotor activity, and the superior colliculus, which contributes to the control of eye movements [1, 2, 4].

Fig. 1
figure1

The classical model of the basal ganglia under healthy condition and in PD. a In the healthy brain, the main excitatory inputs to the basal ganglia arise from the cerebral cortex and enter the basal ganglia through both the striatum and the STN. Cortical excitatory inputs are processed through the direct (d), indirect (i), and hyperdirect (h) pathways to influence the neuronal activity of the basal ganglia output nuclei, the SNr/GPi, which, in turn, regulate the activity of downstream motor control areas in the brain stem and thalamic nuclei. Dopaminergic projections (blue) from the SNc dynamically modulate cellular activity in the basal ganglia through D1 or D2 receptors. b In the parkinsonian state, the degeneration of SNc DA neurons and the loss of dopaminergic projections result in the hyperactivity of indirect pathway SPNs, the hypoactivity of neurons in the GPe (gray), and the disinhibition of the STN and GPi/SNr (red), ultimately leading to enhanced inhibition of motor regions in the brain stem and thalamus (gray) and reduced movements

The striatum is the largest component and the main input structure of the basal ganglia, and it receives major excitatory inputs from layer V glutamatergic pyramidal neurons of the cerebral cortex. GABAergic spiny projection neurons (SPNs) are the principal neurons in the striatum and represent 90% of all striatal cells. Two biochemically and anatomically distinct types of SPNs give rise to the so-called “direct” and “indirect” pathways of the basal ganglia, which process afferent information directly or indirectly to basal ganglia outputs, respectively. Direct pathway SPNs (dSPNs) express D1-like receptors (D1Rs) and project directly to neurons in the SNr/GPi, while indirect pathway SPNs (iSPNs) express D2-like receptors (D2Rs) and project to the GPe, which in turn is connected to the STN through GABAergic synapses, forming the classical indirect basal ganglia pathway [2, 5] (Fig. 1a). The STN is another major input station of the basal ganglia, and STN neurons release the neurotransmitter glutamate. STN neurons receive monosynaptic inputs from the cerebral cortex (Fig. 1a), forming the “hyperdirect” pathway [6, 7].

Based on the classical model of the basal ganglia, excitatory cortical inputs are dynamically processed through the direct, indirect, and hyperdirect pathways to the basal ganglia output stations, the SNr and the GPi (Fig. 1a). SNr/GPi neurons exhibit a high level of spontaneous firing at rest, which tonically inhibits downstream motor areas, such as the motor thalamus and brain stem [4, 8]. The activation of dSPNs increases GABA release and thus decreases the activity of neurons in the SNr/GPi, which in turn reduces tonic inhibitory outputs to downstream motor regions and thus promotes movement. On the other hand, the activation of iSPNs or STN neurons produces a net excitatory effect on SNr/GPi neurons through either disinhibition or direct excitation mechanisms; this effect in turn elevates GABAergic outputs to downstream motor areas and thus inhibits movement [2, 4]. Recent advances in neurotechnology for neural circuit manipulation have made it possible to directly test the relationship between the anatomical connections of the basal ganglia and behavioral effects. For example, the stimulation of dSPNs and iSPNs using optogenetic or chemogenetic tools increases and decreases, respectively, the motor activity of animals [9,10,11], which is largely in line with the classical model of the basal ganglia (Fig. 1a).

Over the last 30 years, the classical model has greatly shaped our understanding of the physiology of the basal ganglia, the pathophysiology of basal ganglia-related neurological diseases, and the development of surgical approaches for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the classical model has been challenged by recent advances in our understanding of the anatomy, physiology, and behavioral relevance of the basal ganglia. For example, studies using in vivo electrophysiology recording and imaging techniques have suggested that temporally coordinated activation of dSPNs and iSPNs is required to successfully initiate, execute, and complete specific movements [12,13,14]. This is in contrast to the classical model of basal ganglia, i.e., a simple “Go/No-Go” relationship between the direct and indirect pathways. Moreover, synaptic connections in the basal ganglia are usually bidirectional rather than unidirectional, as suggested by the classical model [15]. For example, reciprocal synaptic projections between the GPe and the STN (Fig. 1a) have been established and characterized by anatomical studies for decades and implicated in the propagation of pathological activity throughout the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical network [16, 17]. In addition, the heterogeneity of cell types and synaptic connections is increasingly recognized as a common feature of the basal ganglia circuits [15, 18,19,20,21]. The best example is the heterogeneity of GPe neurons as well as their complicated local and long-range connections [15, 18, 22,23,24]. The functional implications and behavioral relevance of these cell-type- or brain-region-specific projections are not fully understood. Furthermore, SNc DA neurons corelease GABA and glutamate at their axon terminals [25,26,27], which greatly affects how DA neurotransmission modulates the synaptic and cellular properties of postsynaptic targets and basal ganglia-related behavior.

The basal ganglia model of PD pathophysiology

SNc dopaminergic neurons send prominent dopaminergic projections to striatal SPNs and other basal ganglia nuclei (Fig. 1a). In the healthy brain, the release of DA upon the firing of these DA neurons dynamically modulates the synaptic and intrinsic properties of postsynaptic targets depending on their expression of distinct DA receptor subtypes [28]. Striatal dSPNs and iSPNs express D1- and D2-like receptors, respectively, and they respond differently upon DA neurotransmission because of the distinct intracellular signaling cascades involved. In brief, DA release increases the activity of striatal dSPNs by stimulating Gs/olf-coupled D1 receptors and decreases the activity of iSPNs by stimulating Gi-coupled D2 receptors. Thus, striatal DA release favors the activity of the direct pathway over that of the indirect pathway. The net effect of DA release in the striatum is a decrease in basal ganglia output, which disinhibits the thalamic nuclei and brain stem, leading to the initiation and execution of normal movements.

In the parkinsonian state, however, the loss of DA in the striatum decreases the activity of dSPNs and their excitability in response to cortical excitation, which ultimately disinhibits GABAergic projection neurons in the SNr/GPi. In parallel, the loss of DA in the striatum increases iSPN excitability and enhances the sensitivity of iSPNs to cortical excitation through the elimination of D2 receptor-mediated inhibition. Increased striatal inhibition of GPe neurons disinhibits STN activity, leading to enhanced STN-mediated excitation of neurons in the SNr/GPi (Fig. 1b). Therefore, the loss of DA disrupts the balance in activity between the striatal direct and indirect pathways and enhances inhibitory basal ganglia outputs to the motor thalamus and brain stem, ultimately leading to a reduction in motor outputs (Fig. 1b). The imbalance in activity between the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia following the loss of DA is the dominant theory regarding the pathophysiology of motor deficits in PD, such as paucity and slowness of movements. This theory was proposed based on evidence and observations from animal models of complete DA depletion or from postmortem examination of brain tissues from end-stage PD patients [2]. Considering the progressive nature of DA degeneration in PD and the different sensitivities of distinct subtypes of DA receptors to DA, exploration of the temporal evolution of the imbalance in activity between the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia as PD progresses is critically needed. Such knowledge would help to establish the relationship between the level of DA depletion, the relative activity of the striatal direct and indirect pathways, and the severity of motor dysfunction.

Recent advances in experimental tools, particularly techniques for in vivo cell labeling and identification and in vivo Ca2+ imaging, have made it possible to measure the neuronal activity of different cell subtypes in specific brain regions under both healthy and disease conditions. For example, the hyperactivity of striatal iSPNs compared to dSPNs has been demonstrated using in vivo electrophysiology recording techniques that monitor the spontaneous activity of these two SPN subtypes in both rat and mouse models of PD [29, 30]. Of particular interest, Escande et al. [31] recently demonstrated that dSPNs, but not iSPNs, show a reduced number of spikes upon stimulation of the cerebral cortex after partial nigrostriatal DA depletion. Thus, the imbalance in activity between the direct and indirect pathways can be caused by either increased iSPNs excitability or decreased dSPNs responsiveness to excitatory inputs. Furthermore, the findings of Escande et al. also indicate that the balance in activity between the striatal direct and indirect pathways may be disrupted in the early stages of PD, i.e., prior to the onset of motor symptoms. What is the precise nature of the brain dysfunction that determines the onset of motor deficits in PD? Future studies focusing on adaptive changes outside of the striatum are needed to address this fundamental question.

As mentioned earlier, precise coordination between the activity of dSPNs and iSPNs is required for the successful initiation and execution of specific movements in normal animals, and DA transmission is a crucial factor in determining the temporal profiles of striatal SPNs activation [32]. Consistently, cell-type-specific optogenetic manipulation of SPNs activity in vivo either slows, prolongs, or stops the initiation and execution of an action sequence [13]. It seems plausible that the loss of DA neuromodulation in the parkinsonian state disrupts the temporal pattern of coordinated activity between the striatal direct and indirect pathways during movement. Indeed, by monitoring the population activity of SPNs in parkinsonian and control mice, Parker et al. [33] demonstrated that DA depletion in locomoting mice disrupts both the firing frequency and the temporospatial profiles of SPNs activity. Interestingly, the population activity of iSPNs in the parkinsonian state becomes spatially dispersed and shows reduced temporal coupling at the start and end of movements [33]. This study highlights the importance of coordinated activity of neural ensembles in the striatum for normal motor control and suggests that the disruption of the coordination and specificity of SPNs perhaps contributes to motor impairments in PD. This study is of particular importance to the field because it conceptually advances our understanding of PD pathophysiology at the cellular and circuit levels.

Cellular and circuit adaptations in the striatum in PD

The classical basal ganglia model of PD pathophysiology was proposed based on the acute effects of DA depletion on cellular and synaptic properties in the striatum. However, the neural network is not static. Neurons in the brain are capable of stabilizing cellular and network functions through a series of synaptic and cellular adaptations (i.e., homeostatic plasticity mechanisms) in response to external and internal disturbances [34]. Indeed, numerous molecular, cellular, and synaptic adaptations in the basal ganglia have been reported following the loss of SNc dopaminergic neurons. Some of these alterations have been proposed to be compensatory in nature, stabilizing cellular and circuit functions associated with lower amounts of DA in the basal ganglia. Others, however, are perhaps pathological, contributing to the manifestation of motor impairments in PD. The following sections summarize recent findings of morphological and functional alterations in two major input nuclei, the striatum and the STN, at the cellular and circuit levels following the loss of DA and discuss the potential roles of these adaptive alterations in the pathophysiology of the motor symptoms of PD.

DA depletion rewires local striatal circuits

Early studies of postmortem tissues from PD patients demonstrated apparent alterations in the morphologies of SPNs, such as a significant reduction in the length of the dendritic tree and a loss of spine density [35, 36]. These findings from postmortem analysis of end-stage PD were subsequently confirmed in neurotoxin-based animal models of PD using either Golgi impregnation of fixed brains [37] or two-photon live-cell imaging [38, 39]. Of particular interest, both dSPNs and iSPNs of 6-OHDA-lesioned mice show reduced dendritic length and decreased dendritic spine density, but only changes in iSPNs can be reversed by prolonged l-DOPA treatment [39]. The distinct effects of l-DOPA on morphological alterations in dSPNs and iSPNs suggest that the shrinkage of the dendritic tree and loss of spines of iSPNs are direct consequences of DA depletion, whereas structural alterations in dSPNs are due to the secondary effects of DA depletion, such as network effects.

In addition to morphological changes, the loss of DA triggers a homeostatic increase in intrinsic dSPNs excitability and a decrease in intrinsic iSPNs excitability [39, 40]. Moreover, Gittis et al. [41] demonstrated that DA depletion increases inhibitory inputs to iSPNs from parvalbumin-expressing interneurons. Therefore, DA depletion rewires the local circuit of the striatum by decreases the intrinsic excitability of iSPNs, decreasing corticostriatal synaptic density, and increasing GABAergic inhibition. Considering the hyperactivity of iSPNs in PD, these cellular and synaptic alterations may be homeostatic mechanisms that stabilize striatal function and delay the onset of motor deficits in PD. Concurrently, homeostatic plasticity also occurs in dSPNs to compensate for their hypoactivity following the loss of DA through an increase in intrinsic excitability [39]. Interestingly, l-DOPA treatment can fully restore the altered intrinsic excitability of iSPNs but only mildly affects the intrinsic excitability of dSPNs [39]. These observations suggest the engagement of different mechanisms (cell-autonomous versus network mechanisms) in regulating the intrinsic plasticity of SPNs in the parkinsonian state [42].

Long-term synaptic plasticity of striatal excitatory synapses in PD

Striatal SPNs are capable of exhibiting long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) at corticostriatal synapses, although different molecular mechanisms are involved in long-term synaptic alterations in dSPNs and iSPNs [43, 44]. Shen et al. [43, 45] demonstrated that LTP induction in dSPNs is mediated by the activation of NMDA receptors and D1 receptors, whereas LTD induction depends on the activation of muscarinic M4 receptors and mGluR5 receptors. In iSPNs, LTP induction depends on the activation of A2A receptors and NMDA receptors, whereas LTD induction is gated by postsynaptic D2 receptors and mGluR5 receptors [43]. Thus, striatal dSPNs and iSPNs are capable of either the potentiation or depression of synaptic inputs in the normal state, and this bidirectional regulation of synaptic strength is precisely regulated by neuromodulators. However, bidirectional synaptic plasticity at corticostriatal synapses is disrupted in a cell-type-specific manner in the parkinsonian state, i.e., LTP and LTD at corticostriatal synapses are selectively impaired in dSPNs and iSPNs, respectively [43, 44]. In parkinsonian animals, LTP is abolished in dSPNs because of the absence of D1R activation, and LTD is abolished because of a lack of D2R activation. Thus, iSPNs only exhibit LTP, whereas dSPNs only show LTD in DA-depleted animals [43]. While bidirectional synaptic plasticity at corticostriatal synapses under healthy conditions is required for motor learning and normal motor control, unidirectional synaptic plasticity at corticostriatal synapses following the loss of DA plays a critical role in the disruption of the balance between dSPNs and iSPNs activity [43, 44] and thus is an important cellular and circuit mechanism associated with PD pathophysiology.

In addition, Parker et al. [46] reported abnormal strengthening of thalamostriatal inputs to iSPNs but not to dSPNs following the loss of DA. The chemogenetic or optogenetic inhibition of thalamic inputs to iSPNs ameliorates motor dysfunction in a 6-OHDA-lesioned model of PD, indicating that such strengthening is maladaptive in nature. Although the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying thalamocortical remodeling remain unknown, this study further emphasizes the importance of investigating PD pathophysiology in a cell-type- and input-defined manner. Most studies in the literature have used 6-OHDA to induce complete DA depletion to mimic end-stage PD; thus, we have little information about the cell-type-specific synaptic plasticity alterations in the presence of different striatal DA levels, which represent distinct stages of PD [47].

Cellular and circuit adaptations in the STN in PD

STN neuronal firing under healthy conditions and in PD

STN neurons receive monosynaptic cortical excitatory inputs through the hyperdirect pathway, and they receive major inhibitory inputs from the GPe, which forms part of the indirect pathway [2, 6, 7] (Fig. 1a). Thus, the STN is at the intersection of the hyperdirect and indirect pathways and plays a critical role in movement control by integrating and transmitting movement-related information to basal ganglia outputs. STN neurons spontaneously fire action potentials in vivo [48,49,50], and the rate and pattern of STN discharges vary under different physiological states. A battery of ionic mechanisms that give rise to the autonomous activity of STN neurons has been determined using brain slice physiological approaches [51, 52]. Moreover, both excitatory and inhibitory inputs play important roles in the control of STN neuronal activity under both healthy and disease conditions [52]. During slow-wave sleep and under urethane anesthesia, synchronized excitatory glutamatergic inputs from the cerebral cortex drive STN neuron firing in rhythmic bursts of action potentials (approximately 1 Hz) [53, 54]. Moreover, perisomatic GABAergic inputs from the GPe have been proposed to effectively reset the oscillatory cycle of ionic mechanisms underlying the rhythmic firing of STN neurons and thus promote burst firing of action potentials through GABAA receptor-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic potentials [17, 55].

Topographically, the dorsolateral part of the STN is responsible for processing motor-related information [56], and this is also the region that show prominent pathological activity in PD [57,58,59]. In idiopathic and experimental models of PD, STN neurons are hyperactive and exhibit synchronized rhythmic activity that is highly correlated with cortical and GPe activity [16, 60]. Indeed, pathological oscillations (particularly the β band between 13 and 30 Hz) are prominent throughout the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical network [57, 61], which is closely linked to motor symptoms in PD, such as akinesia and rigidity. For example, the abnormal coherent and rhythmic activity within the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical network can be concurrently suppressed by symptomatic PD treatment, including dopaminergic replacement therapy and deep brain stimulation [62,63,64]. Of particular interest, the abnormal rate and pattern of STN activity emerge weeks after the loss of DA in neurotoxin-based animal models of PD [60, 65], indicating the involvement of cellular and synaptic plasticity in its emergence, development, and stabilization.

Synaptic and cellular plasticity of STN neurons in PD

As discussed above, DA depletion induces numerous synaptic and cellular plasticity processes in the striatum, which favors the hyperactivity of iSPNs and leads to enhanced striatal inhibition of prototypical GPe neurons and disinhibition of STN neurons (Fig. 1b). Based on the classical model, STN hyperactivity in the parkinsonian state is a network phenomenon rather than a cell-autonomous increase in intrinsic excitability. Indeed, STN neurons in brain slices derived from 6-OHDA-lesioned mouse models of PD show decreased, irregular, spontaneous firing [66,67,68,69]. McIver et al. [68] recently reported that in PD, abnormal spontaneous firing of STN neurons is associated with activated ATP-sensitive K+ channel function due to reduced ATP production by impaired mitochondria. Excessive NMDA receptor activation in the parkinsonian state impairs the mitochondrial function of STN neurons, although the source of glutamatergic excitation that tonically stimulates NMDARs has not yet been defined. Considering the presence of STN hyperactivity in patients and animal models of PD, a decrease in the intrinsic excitability of STN neurons can act as a homeostatic mechanism for stabilizing cellular and circuit function.

What are the potential network mechanisms that underlie the pathological rate and pattern of STN activity in vivo? STN neurons are autonomously active and are driven by a group of voltage-gated ion channels [51, 52]. The rhythmic membrane cycle underlying the autonomous firing of STN neurons can be effectively shifted by cortical excitation and GPe inhibition [51, 52]. Moreover, DA depletion alters the responsiveness of both the glutamatergic and GABAergic receptors of STN neurons [70], indicating adaptive changes at the cellular level. Fan et al. [71]. and Chu et al. [72]. provided molecular, anatomical, and functional evidence that the inhibitory GPe-STN synaptic connection is abnormally strengthened following the loss of DA through an increase in the number of release sites per GPe-STN axon terminal. This abnormal strengthening of the GPe-STN synaptic connection is mediated by the excessive activation of NMDA receptors in the STN and can be reversed by the genetic knockdown of NMDA receptors in STN neurons in vivo [72]. The abnormal strengthening of GP-STN synapses is pathological in nature because its prevention by genetic manipulation ameliorates motor impairments in parkinsonian mice [72].

In parallel with abnormal strengthening of inhibitory GP-STN synapses, a dramatic reduction in the number of cortico-STN synaptic terminals and synaptic connection strength have been reported in both rodents and primate models of PD [69, 73, 74]. These synaptic adaptations significantly rewire the local circuit in the STN and dramatically shift the excitation-to-inhibition balance of STN neurons. Furthermore, in the parkinsonian state, the activity of STN neurons is off-phase to GPe activity and in-phase to cortical activity [16, 60]. Thus, it is predicted that GPe-STN inhibitory inputs are less effective in suppressing cortical excitation through shunting but more effective in promoting the cortical mediation of STN activity through deinactivation of postsynaptic voltage-gated Na+ and Ca2+ channels, which are the ionic mechanisms underlying the generation of the rhythmic activity of STN neurons [55]. Therefore, enhanced connections between the cerebral cortex and the STN (the hyperdirect pathway) in PD are largely driven by aberrant temporal interactions between pallidal inhibition and cortical excitation in the STN rather than strengthening of cortico-STN synaptic connections per se. In other words, the relative synaptic strength and timing of cortico-STN excitation and GPe-STN inhibition following a loss of DA are the major circuit mechanisms that drive the synchronized and coherent activity of STN neurons in vivo. Moreover, the effectiveness of dopamine-targeting drugs or deep brain stimulation of the STN is believed to be mediated by the disruption or suppression of aberrant oscillatory activity within the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical network in the parkinsonian brain.

In summary, the loss of DA in the striatum triggers numerous synaptic and cellular alterations in the basal ganglia nuclei, which are believed to underlie the pathological pattern of activity throughout the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical network and eventually contribute to the devastating motor symptoms of PD. The disruption of an abnormal pattern of activity within the network is proposed to be a common mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of symptomatic treatments. It is worth noting that a reduction in striatal DA levels and changes in striatal SPNs activity are responsible for all adaptive changes in downstream targets, such as those in the STN and SNr. For example, the upregulation of iSPNs activity using chemogenetic tools in mice with normal DA levels triggers similar synaptic and cellular adaptations in the STN and impairs the plasticity associated with DA depletion in 6-OHDA-lesioned models of PD [69]. Moreover, SNr GABAergic projection neurons also exhibit adaptive changes in neurotoxin-based models, and the extent of these adaptations correlates with the amount of striatal DA [75]. However, it remains uncertain whether, as the dopamine level drops, alterations in striatal dSPNs, iSPNs, or both are critical for triggering network-level alterations within the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical network.

Conclusion

The loss of DA neuromodulation in the basal ganglia induces numerous adaptive changes at the molecular, cellular, and circuit levels, ultimately leading to the manifestation of a pathological pattern of activity in the parkinsonian brain. Recent advances in neurotechnology for cell labeling and neural activity monitoring have provided the field with unique opportunities to evaluate adaptive changes in the parkinsonian brain in a cell-type- and synapse-defined way, which will give rise to critical information that is required to advance our understanding of the cellular and circuit bases of PD pathophysiology. Once again, most of our current knowledge regarding adaptive changes in the parkinsonian brain comes from postmortem analysis of brain tissues from PD patients or neurotoxin-based animal models of end-stage PD. We have limited information on how the brain adapts to gradual DA degeneration, such as that which in PD, and this is a basic and critical question that needs to be addressed in the next decade. The development and characterization of genetic and α-synuclein-based progressive models of PD [76, 77] represent a great opportunity for the field to analyze brain adaptations at the cellular and circuit levels as the disease progresses. With this information, we will be able to causally link changes in the brain with the critical pathophysiological mechanisms that drive PD symptoms.

References

  1. 1.

    Grillner S, Robertson B. The basal ganglia over 500 million years. Curr Biol. 2016;26:R1088–R1100.

  2. 2.

    Albin RL, Young AB, Penney JB. The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends Neurosci. 1989;12:366–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    DeLong MR. Primate models of movement disorders of basal ganglia origin. Trends Neurosci. 1990;13:281–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hikosaka O, Takikawa Y, Kawagoe R. Role of the basal ganglia in the control of purposive saccadic eye movements. Physiol Rev. 2000;80:953–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Smith Y, Bevan MD, Shink E, Bolam JP. Microcircuitry of the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia. Neuroscience. 1998;86:353–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kita H, Kita T. Cortical stimulation evokes abnormal responses in the dopamine-depleted rat basal ganglia. J Neurosci. 2011;31:10311–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nambu A, Tokuno H, Takada M. Functional significance of the cortico-subthalamo-pallidal ‘hyperdirect’ pathway. Neurosci Res. 2002;43:111–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Goldberg JH, Farries MA, Fee MS. Basal ganglia output to the thalamus: still a paradox. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36:695–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Roseberry TK, Lee AM, Lalive AL, Wilbrecht L, Bonci A, Kreitzer AC. Cell-type-specific control of brainstem locomotor circuits by basal ganglia. Cell. 2016;164:526–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kravitz AV, Freeze BS, Parker PR, Kay K, Thwin MT, Deisseroth K, et al. Regulation of parkinsonian motor behaviours by optogenetic control of basal ganglia circuitry. Nature. 2010;466:622–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Farrell MS, Pei Y, Wan Y, Yadav PN, Daigle TL, Urban DJ, et al. A Galphas DREADD mouse for selective modulation of cAMP production in striatopallidal neurons. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:854–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cui G, Jun SB, Jin X, Pham MD, Vogel SS, Lovinger DM, et al. Concurrent activation of striatal direct and indirect pathways during action initiation. Nature. 2013;494:238–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tecuapetla F, Jin X, Lima SQ, Costa RM. Complementary contributions of striatal projection pathways to action initiation and execution. Cell. 2016;166:703–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sippy T, Lapray D, Crochet S, Petersen CC. Cell-type-specific sensorimotor processing in striatal projection neurons during goal-directed behavior. Neuron. 2015;88:298–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mallet N, Micklem BR, Henny P, Brown MT, Williams C, Bolam JP, et al. Dichotomous organization of the external globus pallidus. Neuron. 2012;74:1075–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mallet N, Pogosyan A, Márton LF, Bolam JP, Brown P, Magill PJ. Parkinsonian beta oscillations in the external globus pallidus and their relationship with subthalamic nucleus activity. J Neurosci. 2008;28:14245–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bevan MD, Magill PJ, Terman D, Bolam JP, Wilson CJ. Move to the rhythm: oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus-external globus pallidus network. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:525–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hegeman DJ, Hong ES, Hernández VM, Chan CS. The external globus pallidus: progress and perspectives. Eur J Neurosci. 2016;43:1239–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rizzi G, Tan KR. Synergistic nigral output pathways shape movement. Cell Rep. 2019;27:2184–98.e4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wallace ML, Saunders A, Huang KW, Philson AC, Goldman M, Macosko EZ, et al. Genetically distinct parallel pathways in the entopeduncular nucleus for limbic and sensorimotor output of the basal ganglia. Neuron. 2017;94:138–52.e5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tepper JM, Koós T, Ibanez-Sandoval O, Tecuapetla F, Faust TW, Assous M. Heterogeneity and diversity of striatal GABAergic interneurons: Update 2018. Front Neuroanat. 2018;12:1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Saunders A, Huang KW, Sabatini BL. Globus pallidus externus neurons expressing parvalbumin interconnect the subthalamic nucleus and striatal interneurons. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Abdi A, Mallet N, Mohamed FY, Sharott A, Dodson PD, Nakamura KC, et al. Prototypic and arkypallidal neurons in the dopamine-intact external globus pallidus. J Neurosci. 2015;35:6667–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gittis AH, Berke JD, Bevan MD, Chan CS, Mallet N, Morrow MM, et al. New roles for the external globus pallidus in basal ganglia circuits and behavior. J Neurosci. 2014;34:15178–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tritsch NX, Ding JB, Sabatini BL. Dopaminergic neurons inhibit striatal output through non-canonical release of GABA. Nature. 2012;490:262–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Antal M, Beneduce BM, Regehr WG. The substantia nigra conveys target-dependent excitatory and inhibitory outputs from the basal ganglia to the thalamus. J Neurosci. 2014;34:8032–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tecuapetla F, Patel JC, Xenias H, English D, Tadros I, Shah F, et al. Glutamatergic signaling by mesolimbic dopamine neurons in the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 2010;30:7105–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhai S, Tanimura A, Graves SM, Shen W, Surmeier DJ. Striatal synapses, circuits, and Parkinson’s disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018;48:9–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ryan MB, Bair-Marshall C, Nelson AB. Aberrant striatal activity in parkinsonism and levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Cell Rep. 2018;23:3438–46.e5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mallet N, Ballion B, Le Moine C, Gonon F. Cortical inputs and GABA interneurons imbalance projection neurons in the striatum of parkinsonian rats. J Neurosci. 2006;26:3875–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Escande MV, Taravini IR, Zold CL, Belforte JE, Murer MG. Loss of homeostasis in the direct pathway in a mouse model of asymptomatic Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci. 2016;36:5686–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Howe MW, Dombeck DA. Rapid signalling in distinct dopaminergic axons during locomotion and reward. Nature. 2016;535:505–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Parker JG, Marshall JD, Ahanonu B, Wu YW, Kim TH, Grewe BF, et al. Diametric neural ensemble dynamics in parkinsonian and dyskinetic states. Nature. 2018;557:177–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Turrigiano G. Homeostatic synaptic plasticity: local and global mechanisms for stabilizing neuronal function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4:a005736

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Stephens B, Mueller AJ, Shering AF, Hood SH, Taggart P, Arbuthnott GW, et al. Evidence of a breakdown of corticostriatal connections in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 2005;132:741–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    McNeill TH, Brown SA, Rafols JA, Shoulson I. Atrophy of medium spiny I striatal dendrites in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res. 1988;455:148–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ingham CA, Hood SH, Arbuthnott GW. Spine density on neostriatal neurones changes with 6-hydroxydopamine lesions and with age. Brain Res. 1989;503:334–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Day M, Wang Z, Ding J, An X, Ingham CA, Shering AF, et al. Selective elimination of glutamatergic synapses on striatopallidal neurons in Parkinson disease models. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Fieblinger T, Graves SM, Sebel LE, Alcacer C, Plotkin JL, Gertler TS, et al. Cell type-specific plasticity of striatal projection neurons in parkinsonism and L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Nat Commun. 2014;5:1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Day M, Wokosin D, Plotkin JL, Tian X, Surmeier DJ. Differential excitability and modulation of striatal medium spiny neuron dendrites. J Neurosci. 2008;28:11603–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gittis AH, Hang GB, LaDow ES, Shoenfeld LR, Atallah BV, Finkbeiner S, et al. Rapid target-specific remodeling of fast-spiking inhibitory circuits after loss of dopamine. Neuron. 2011;71:858–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Graves SM, Surmeier DJ. Delayed spine pruning of direct pathway spiny projection neurons in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Shen W, Flajolet M, Greengard P, Surmeier DJ. Dichotomous dopaminergic control of striatal synaptic plasticity. Science. 2008;321:848–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Thiele SL, Chen B, Lo C, Gertler TS, Warre R, Surmeier JD, et al. Selective loss of bi-directional synaptic plasticity in the direct and indirect striatal output pathways accompanies generation of parkinsonism and l-DOPA induced dyskinesia in mouse models. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;71:334–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Shen W, Plotkin JL, Francardo V, Ko WK, Xie Z, Li Q, et al. M4 muscarinic receptor signaling ameliorates striatal plasticity deficits in models of L-dopa-induced dyskinesia. Neuron. 2015;88:762–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Parker PR, Lalive AL, Kreitzer AC. Pathway-specific remodeling of thalamostriatal synapses in parkinsonian mice. Neuron. 2016;89:734–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Paillé V, Picconi B, Bagetta V, Ghiglieri V, Sgobio C, Di Filippo M, et al. Distinct levels of dopamine denervation differentially alter striatal synaptic plasticity and NMDA receptor subunit composition. J Neurosci. 2010;30:14182–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    DeLong MR, Crutcher MD, Georgopoulos AP. Primate globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus: functional organization. J Neurophysiol. 1985;53:530–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wichmann T, Bergman H, DeLong MR. The primate subthalamic nucleus. I. Functional properties in intact animals. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72:494–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Matsumura M, Kojima J, Gardiner TW, Hikosaka O. Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey subthalamic nucleus. J Neurophysiol. 1992;67:1615–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bevan MD, Wilson CJ. Mechanisms underlying spontaneous oscillation and rhythmic firing in rat subthalamic neurons. J Neurosci. 1999;19:7617–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wilson CJ, Bevan MD. Intrinsic dynamics and synaptic inputs control the activity patterns of subthalamic nucleus neurons in health and in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 2011;198:55–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Magill PJ, Bolam JP, Bevan MD. Dopamine regulates the impact of the cerebral cortex on the subthalamic nucleus-globus pallidus network. Neuroscience. 2001;106:313–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Magill PJ, Bolam JP, Bevan MD. Relationship of activity in the subthalamic nucleus-globus pallidus network to cortical electroencephalogram. J Neurosci. 2000;20:820–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Baufreton J, Atherton JF, Surmeier DJ, Bevan MD. Enhancement of excitatory synaptic integration by GABAergic inhibition in the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8505–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hamani C, Saint-Cyr JA, Fraser J, Kaplitt M, Lozano AM. The subthalamic nucleus in the context of movement disorders. Brain. 2004;127:4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Galvan A, Wichmann T. Pathophysiology of parkinsonism. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:1459–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Delaville C, McCoy AJ, Gerber CM, Cruz AV, Walters JR. Subthalamic nucleus activity in the awake hemiparkinsonian rat: relationships with motor and cognitive networks. J Neurosci. 2015;35:6918–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sharott A, Gulberti A, Zittel S, Tudor Jones AA, Fickel U, Münchau A, et al. Activity parameters of subthalamic nucleus neurons selectively predict motor symptom severity in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci. 2014;34:6273–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Mallet N, Pogosyan A, Sharott A, Csicsvari J, Bolam JP, Brown P, et al. Disrupted dopamine transmission and the emergence of exaggerated beta oscillations in subthalamic nucleus and cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2008;28:4795–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Moran RJ, Mallet N, Litvak V, Dolan RJ, Magill PJ, Friston KJ, et al. Alterations in brain connectivity underlying beta oscillations in Parkinsonism. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1002124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Tinkhauser G, Pogosyan A, Tan H, Herz DM, Kühn AA, Brown P. Beta burst dynamics in Parkinson’s disease off and on dopaminergic medication. Brain. 2017;140:2968–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Williams D, Kühn A, Kupsch A, Tijssen M, van Bruggen G, Speelman H, et al. The relationship between oscillatory activity and motor reaction time in the parkinsonian subthalamic nucleus. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:249–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Torrecillos F, Tinkhauser G, Fischer P, Green AL, Aziz TZ, Foltynie T, et al. Modulation of beta bursts in the subthalamic nucleus predicts motor performance. J Neurosci. 2018;38:8905–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Vila M, Périer C, Féger J, Yelnik J, Faucheux B, Ruberg M, et al. Evolution of changes in neuronal activity in the subthalamic nucleus of rats with unilateral lesion of the substantia nigra assessed by metabolic and electrophysiological measurements. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12:337–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zhu Z, Bartol M, Shen K, Johnson SW. Excitatory effects of dopamine on subthalamic nucleus neurons: in vitro study of rats pretreated with 6-hydroxydopamine and levodopa. Brain Res. 2002;945:31–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Wilson CL, Cash D, Galley K, Chapman H, Lacey MG, Stanford IM. Subthalamic nucleus neurones in slices from 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned mice show irregular, dopamine-reversible firing pattern changes, but without synchronous activity. Neuroscience. 2006;143:565–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    McIver EL, Atherton JF, Chu HY, Cosgrove KE, Kondapalli J, Wokosin D, et al. Maladaptive downregulation of autonomous subthalamic nucleus activity following the loss of midbrain dopamine neurons. Cell Rep. 2019;28:992–1002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Chu HY, McIver EL, Kovaleski RF, Atherton JF, Bevan MD. Loss of hyperdirect pathway cortico-subthalamic inputs following degeneration of midbrain dopamine neurons. Neuron. 2017;95:1306–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Shen KZ, Johnson SW. Dopamine depletion alters responses to glutamate and GABA in the rat subthalamic nucleus. Neuroreport. 2005;16:171–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Fan KY, Baufreton J, Surmeier DJ, Chan CS, Bevan MD. Proliferation of external globus pallidus-subthalamic nucleus synapses following degeneration of midbrain dopamine neurons. J Neurosci. 2012;32:13718–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Chu HY, Atherton JF, Wokosin D, Surmeier DJ, Bevan MD. Heterosynaptic regulation of external globus pallidus inputs to the subthalamic nucleus by the motor cortex. Neuron. 2015;85:364–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Mathai A, Ma Y, Paré JF, Villalba RM, Wichmann T, Smith Y. Reduced cortical innervation of the subthalamic nucleus in MPTP-treated parkinsonian monkeys. Brain. 2015;138:946–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Wang YY, Wang Y, Jiang HF, Liu JH, Jia J, Wang K, et al. Impaired glutamatergic projection from the motor cortex to the subthalamic nucleus in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned hemi-parkinsonian rats. Exp Neurol. 2018;300:135–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Willard AM, Isett BR, Whalen TC, Mastro KJ, Ki CS, Mao X, et al. State transitions in the substantia nigra reticulata predict the onset of motor deficits in models of progressive dopamine depletion in mice. Elife. 2019;8:1–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Ekstrand MI, Terzioglu M, Galter D, Zhu S, Hofstetter C, Lindqvist E, et al. Progressive parkinsonism in mice with respiratory-chain-deficient dopamine neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:1325–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Chesselet MF, Richter F. Modelling of Parkinson’s disease in mice. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:1108–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported by start-up funds from Van Andel Institute (to HYC). The author thanks David Nadziejka for technical editing assistance.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Yuan Chu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chu, HY. Synaptic and cellular plasticity in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Pharmacol Sin 41, 447–452 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-020-0371-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Parkinson’s disease
  • dopamine
  • basal ganglia
  • striatum
  • subthalamic nucleus
  • synaptic plasticity

Further reading

Search

Quick links