Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex developmental disorder characterized by deficits in social interactions, communication, and stereotypical behaviors. Immune dysfunction is a common co-morbidity seen in ASD, with innate immune activation seen both in the brain and periphery. We previously identified significant differences in peripheral monocyte cytokine responses after stimulation with lipoteichoic acid (LTA) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which activate toll-like receptors (TLR)−2 and 4 respectively. However, an unbiased examination of monocyte gene expression in response to these stimulants had not yet been performed. To identify how TLR activation impacts gene expression in ASD monocytes, we isolated peripheral blood monocytes from 26 children diagnosed with autistic disorder (AD) or pervasive developmental disorder—not otherwise specified (PDDNOS) and 22 typically developing (TD) children and cultured them with LTA or LPS for 24 h, then performed RNA sequencing. Activation of both TLR2 and TLR4 induced expression of immune genes, with a subset that were differentially regulated in AD compared to TD samples. In response to LPS, monocytes from AD children showed a unique increase in KEGG pathways and GO terms that include key immune regulator genes. In contrast, monocytes from TD children showed a consistent decrease in expression of genes associated with translation in response to TLR stimulation. This decrease was not observed in AD or PDDNOS monocytes, suggesting a failure to properly downregulate a prolonged immune response in monocytes from children with ASD. As monocytes are involved in early orchestration of the immune response, our findings will help elucidate the mechanisms regulating immune dysfunction in ASD.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) appearing in early childhood and clinically characterized by impairments in communication, social interactions, and aberrant behaviors such as motor stereotypies. ASD is highly heterogeneous and the degree of deficits and behaviors can vary widely, creating challenges for accurate and early diagnoses . Prevalence of ASD is now estimated to be one in 54 children, with a significant male preponderance . The etiology of ASD is unknown but likely involves a variety of genetic and epigenetic factors influenced by environment interactions . Evidence of immune dysfunction is a recurrent finding that may contribute to ASD severity. Immune links to ASD have been shown pre and postnatally. For instance, familial autoimmunity is highly prevalent, with family history of autoimmune disorders such as Type I diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and thyroid disorders significantly increasing the risk of ASD [3, 4]. Immune-mediated disorders are also over-represented in ASD, including higher rates of allergies, asthma, and bowel disorders [5,6,7,8,9,10], with immune symptoms influencing severity of behaviors [11,12,13].
Several studies have identified immune dysfunction associated with innate immune responses in ASD. Altered circulating innate immune cells including; cell frequencies, activation status, cellular function, and cytokine production are seen in children with ASD [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. This is often accompanied by increased peripheral levels of cytokines most associated with the innate immune response such as, interleukin (IL)−1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)−1 in children with ASD. Immunohistochemistry and protein analysis of post-mortem brain tissue revealed increased inflammatory cytokines and chemokines associated with innate immune activation in brain tissue and cerebral spinal fluid [22,23,24,25]. Furthermore, microglia – the resident macrophage-like cells of the brain - exhibited activated phenotypes in ASD prefrontal cortex and increased spatial proximity to neurons [22, 23]. Microglia and perivascular macrophages in ASD post-mortem brain also had increased expression of activation markers . Transcriptome studies have identified dysregulated genes involved in innate immune pathways and signatures of microglial activation in brain tissue [26,27,28,29]. Many putative animal models of ASD have shown microglia activation and increased inflammatory cytokines in the brain, suggesting a role of innate cells in neuroinflammation in these models [30,31,32,33]. Macrophage activation was also present in ASD-relevant mouse models, with enhanced production of inflammatory cytokines correlating with severity of behaviors including increased grooming and decreased social approach [34, 35].
The innate immune system provides the first line of defense during exposure to pathogens. Monocytes and macrophages are innate sentinel cells that are activated through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as toll-like receptors (TLRs), which broadly recognize conserved microbial motifs called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). TLR engagement leads to activation of transcription factors such as NF-κB and production of proinflammatory cytokines. These early responses then drive downstream immune responses, including antigen presentation and cytokine signaling to activate cells of the adaptive immune system . Innate immune cells thus play a critical role in orchestrating immune responses through production of inflammatory mediators and activation of adaptive immunity, whereby aberrant increased responses in this process can lead to chronic inflammation . We hypothesize that alterations in innate immunity may be contributing to the immune dysfunction frequently seen in ASD.
We previously reported increased inflammatory cytokine production after TLR2/4 stimulation of monocytes from children with ASD ; these data support evidence of altered innate immune responses in ASD and were linked to symptom severity. These findings led us to investigate the impact of TLR2/4 activation, with lipoteichoic acid (LTA) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) respectively, on gene expression in monocytes from children with autistic disorder (AD) and pervasive development disorder—not otherwise specified (PDDNOS) compared to typically developing children (TD). We found that AD monocytes were enriched for a pathway associated with inflammatory activation after TLR stimulation. Furthermore, TD monocytes had decreased expression of genes associated with translation regulation after both treatments, however, this decrease was not seen in either AD or PDDNOS monocytes suggesting a failure to regulate translation after innate activation in monocytes from children on the autism spectrum. Results from this study may provide insight into mechanisms contributing to innate immune dysfunction in ASD.
Materials and methods
48 children ages 4–9 were enrolled as part of the Autism Phenome Project (APP) conducted at the UC Davis M.I.N.D. Institute. Recruitment, behavioral assessments, and study protocols have been previously described in detail . All participants were clinically evaluated prior to 2012 and diagnoses were confirmed by the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R)  and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS)  based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition Text Revision (DSM-IVTR) . Participants were grouped after clinical evaluation into (1) typical developing (TD) children [N = 22, 18 M/4 F], (2) children diagnosed with AD [N = 17, 13 M/4 F]; or (3) children diagnosed with PDDNOS [N = 9, 7 M/2 F]. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants are provided in Table 1. Participants were recruited consecutively and laboratory personnel were blinded to diagnoses. TD children were assessed for achieving development milestones and screened for ASD-like behaviors using the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) and the Mullen’s Scale of Early Learning (MSEL) . Criteria for placement in TD group included scores of <15 on the SCQ and scores within 2 standard deviations of the mean on all subscales of the MSEL. Exclusion criteria for TD children included any known neurological or behavioral problems, developmental delays, speech language impairments, or sibling(s) with ASD. All subjects were screened and excluded for neurological conditions (including seizure disorders, Fragile X or Rett syndrome), psychiatric disorders, or immune-mediated medical conditions (such as celiac disease or other autoimmune disorder). Participants were also excluded if taking prescription medication, had reported illness or fever within 48 h of blood draw, or had suspected or known vision or hearing problems. Participants were assessed for gastrointestinal symptoms through parent survey at time of recruitment by completing the Childhood Autism Risk from Genetics and Environment (CHARGE) study GI symptom survey, which rates GI symptoms on a Likert scale with (0) = never and (4) = always. This survey is based on the Rome III Diagnostic Questionnaire for the Pediatric Functional GI Disorders . Written and informed consent was obtained from parent prior to participation, and approval for this study was approved by the institutional review boards at the University of California, Davis.
CD14+ cell isolation
To isolate peripheral monocytes, blood was collected into acid-citrate-dextrose Vacutainer tubes (BD Biosciences; San Jose, CA). Tubes were centrifuged for 10 min at 1100xg to separate plasma, which was removed and stored at −80 °C. The remaining blood was diluted 1:1 with Hanks Balanced Salt Solution without Ca2+ or Mg2+ (HBSS; Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD), then layered over a Ficoll-Paque gradient (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) and centrifuged at room temperature for 30 m at 630 × g. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were harvested by pipetting the interface layer and transferring to a new container where cells were then washed twice with HBSS. CD14+ cells were isolated using anti-CD14 magnetic beads according to the manufactures protocol (Miltenyi). Live versus dead cell numbers were determined using trypan blue exclusion.
CD14+ monocytes were seeded in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Omega Scientific; Tarzana, CA), 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 IU/ml streptomycin (Sigma, St Louis, MO) at 1.0 × 105 cells/well in 96-well plates. Non-treated (NT) cells served as baseline, treated cells were stimulated with either 1 µg/mL LPS (Escherichia coli serotype 0111:B4, Sigma, St. Louis, MO), or 10 µg/mL LTA (Staphylococcus aureus, Sigma). Cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After 24 h, cells were centrifuged at 870xg for 10 m and processed for RNA extraction.
RNA extraction and library preparation
After removal of supernatants, cells were collected in Qiagen lysis buffer using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Germantown, MD) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were lysed and homogenized in lysis reagent using QIAshredder homogenizers. 70% ethanol was added to the lysate prior to passing through a spin column at 8000 × g to remove genomic DNA. Spin columns containing RNA were washed with ethanol plus RPE buffer three times and centrifuged at 8000 × g, then RNA was eluted from the column in 30 uL RNAse-free water. RNA was treated with DNase and concentrated (Zymo Research, Cat No R1014). RNA quality was assessed by bioanalyzer and all samples had RNA Integrity Numbers > 6. QuantSeq 3′mRNA sequencing FWD (RNAseq) libraries (Lexogen, Cat 015.96) were prepared as stated in the Lexogen manual using 30 ng RNA per sample and 18 cycles of PCR amplification. 48 unique, dual-index barcodes were used then samples were pooled, exonuclease VII treated, and sequenced across three HiSeq4000 lanes to generate Single-End 100 base pair reads.
Raw sequencing reads were assessed for quality control using FastQC and multiqc, then trimmed to remove adapter contamination, polyA read through and low-quality reads using BBDuk. All samples were then re-assessed for quality using FastQC and multiqc. Following trimming and quality assessment, reads were concatenated for each sample down to a single fastq file. Samples were aligned to human genome (GRCh38.p12) using STAR with -outFilterMultimapNmax 20 --alignSJoverhangMin 8 --alignSJDBoverhangMin 1 --outFilterMismatchNmax 999 --outFilterMismatchNoverLmax 0.1 --alignIntronMin 20 --alignIntronMax 1000000 --alignMatesGapMax 1000000 settings.
Alignment bam files were then compared using multiqc, indexed using samtools and then reads per ensembl gene from GRCh38.94 were counted using FeatureCounts at the gene id level with strand information. Counts were then assessed for overall quality using multiqc and read into R for statistical analysis using EdgeR and LimmaVoom. To remove low-expressing genes, genes with less than 1 count per million (CPM) reads in at least ¼ of the total libraries (109) were removed from the analysis (Fig. S1). The remaining 12438 genes were then normalized using Trimmed Mean of M-values (TMM) to correct for library composition using calcNormFactors, method = TMM (Fig. S2). The resulting CPM values were then fed into Voom using a design matrix with factors for Diagnosis x Treatment and sex as a covariate. Within subjects correlation for treatment was removed using the duplicateCorrelation function from Voom followed by inclusion of the correlation matrix in lmFit and subject identification as a blocking factor. Individual contrast comparisons were then called using contrasts.fit followed by eBayes. To evaluate the contribution of each factor to the overall gene expression profile, Multi-Dimensional Scaling plots were constructed for diagnosis, treatment, and sex (Fig. S3).
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified for each comparison of interest using the treat function with a log2foldchange = log2(2) and the decideTests function with a Benjamini Hochberg (BH) correction and method = separate. This produces a list of DEGs for each comparison that both passes BH correction to an adjusted p-value of <0.05 and log2 fold change greater than + or – log2(2). Gene list overlaps were visualized using VennDiagram and nVennR and assessed statistically using a one-tailed Fisher’s Exact Test for enrichment with False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction to p = 0.05. Gene Ontology (GO) and Pathway enrichment testing were performed using ClusterProfiler against a background universe of all genes expressed (passed filtering) in the experiment with FDR correction to p = 0.05. GO term enrichments were simplified using the simplify function in ClusterProfiler to a cutoff of 0.7 using the min function. Heatmaps were made using the pheatmap package. Gene enrichment testing between DEGs and published gene lists were performed using a one-tailed Fisher’s exact test with multiple testing correction (FDR). Spearman’s Rank correlations were performed between log2CPM values and behavioral and GI scores with a Benjamini Hochberg (BH) correction.
There were no significant DEGs at baseline (NT) between TD, AD or PDDNOS, indicating that at rest monocytes are similar across diagnoses (Table S1). We then examined the response to LPS or LTA stimulation within each diagnosis. In response to LPS or LTA stimulation (compared to NT samples of the same diagnosis), there were a large number of both increased and decreased DEGs (Fig. 1, Table S1 and S2). These stimulant-responsive genes showed similar overall patterns for TD, AD and PDDNOS monocytes (Fisher’s Exact Test, Table S3). As expected, the major KEGG pathway and GO term enrichment were involved in monocyte activation and were similar across the different diagnoses for both treatments (Table S4). Some of the most common KEGG pathways included cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, TNF, JAK-STAT, and chemokine signaling pathways (Fig. S4). For Biological Process, terms involving immune activation, inflammatory response, cell adhesion, and chemotaxis were commonly enriched (Fig. S5). In addition, the top shared Molecular Function terms included signaling receptor and molecular transducer activity (Fig. S6). For the analysis of Cellular Component, the integral component of the plasma membrane, cell surface, and extracellular matrix were enriched across DEGs for all three groups and both stimulation types. (Fig. S7).
Although the major responses in ASD and TD were similar in both treatments, i.e., cellular activation, there were subsets of genes that uniquely responded either only in TD, AD, or PDDNOS monocytes (Fig. 2, Table S5). In response to LPS treatment, 78 genes were uniquely increased in AD monocytes, 34 genes were uniquely increased in PDDNOS monocytes, and 122 in TD monocytes (Fig. 2A). Moreover, 134 genes were uniquely decreased in monocytes from children with AD, 48 genes were uniquely decreased in PDDNOS monocytes, and 215 genes in TD monocytes (Fig. 2A). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of genes uniquely increased in ASD monocytes after LPS revealed significant enrichment in the pathogenic E. Coli infection pathway (Fig. 2B and Table S6), including several key immune regulator genes such as FAS cell surface death receptor (FAS), nuclear factor kappa B (NFKB1), and TGF beta Kinase 3 (TAB3). In contrast, genes that were uniquely increased in response to LPS in TD monocytes were enriched for supramolecular fiber and supramolecular polymer. When exploring differentially decreased genes, those uniquely decreased in TD monocytes after LPS stimulation were enriched for GO terms involving translation regulation processes such as the ribosome, rRNA metabolism, and processing (Fig. 2B and Table S6). These genes were not significantly decreased in AD or PDDNOS monocytes in response to LPS.
After LTA stimulation, 86 genes were uniquely increased in AD monocytes, and 21 genes uniquely increased in PDDNOS monocytes. In contrast, there were 128 genes that were uniquely increased in TD monocytes (Fig. 2C). Of DEGs decreased after LTA stimulation, 94 were uniquely decreased in ASD monocytes, 14 were uniquely decreased in PDDNOS and 278 genes were uniquely decreased in TD (Fig. 2C). Genes that were increased in expression only in ASD were not associated with known KEGG pathways or GO enrichment terms. Genes that were increased in expression only in TD were enriched for cytokine receptor interactions. As with DEGs in TD monocytes after LPS stimulation, the decreased genes in TD monocytes following LTA stimulation were enriched for pathways involved in translation including ribosome, rRNA metabolism and processing (Fig. 2D and Table S7). The majority of genes uniquely decreased in TD did not overlap between the LTA and LPS treatment conditions (Fig. 3). For example, of the genes that uniquely decreased expression in TD, only 54 were shared between LPS and LTA conditions (Fig. 3A). However, these genes contained both the ribosomal and translation-relevant genes identified in the GO term analysis in Fig. 2 (Table S8).
DEGs from this study were analyzed for shared enrichment with published lists for DEGs in post-mortem human brain from neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders (Fig. 4A and Table S9). The profile of DEGs responsive to stimulation in monocytes from this study were significantly enriched in DEGs identified across different human brain disorders or inflammatory diseases, including schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease, alcoholism, depression, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), bipolar disorder, and ASD [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Some of these overlapping genes had GO enrichment involving protein translation and protein localization (Table S10). DEGs identified in this study were also enriched within identified genetic risk genes for ASD and intellectual disability (ID) (Fig. 4B and Table S9). Together these data suggest that a subset of genes that confer genetic risk for ASD and ID are also critically regulated in monocytes in response to immune stimulation. Gene expression correlations for each condition to behavioral or GI scores are shown in Table S11. Only one of these correlations was seen in a unique DEG after associated stimulation. Expression of KLHDC7B-DT which encodes long non-coding RNA not involved in translation  correlated with MSEL DQ scores for all participants on the autism spectrum after LTA exposure.
We analyzed gene expression of peripheral monocytes from children with ASD and TD controls that were stimulated with ligands for TLR2/4. There is a strong inflammatory response after activation of TLRs , and as expected, our data demonstrate significant changes in expression of subsets of immune genes after stimulation. Although the majority of DEGs overlapped across all diagnostic groups, we also found uniquely expressed genes depending on diagnoses and treatment. An inflammatory KEGG pathway involved in pathogenic E. coli responses was increased in monocytes from children with AD after LPS stimulation, in addition to GO biological processes involving innate immune activation. In contrast monocytes from TD showed decreased gene pathways for translation regulation after both treatments. Monocytes from PDD-NOS children did not have similar increases in genes associated with inflammatory pathways and GO processes. However, like AD they did lack a significant decrease in translation associated genes after stimulation as seen in TD. These data may suggest prolonged activation of AD monocytes after stimulation, and a failure in normal down-regulation of translation across monocytes from both AD and PDDNOS. Inflammatory differences between AD and PDDNOS are interesting and may potentially provide insight into the heterogeneity of ASD now that these disorders are grouped together under this umbrella term. In TD monocytes, LPS and LTA stimulation activated different genes but they ultimately converge to control similar pathways and suggest some common and some unique signaling mechanisms that are engaged only in activated TD but not in monocytes from AD or PDD-NOS, specifically in decreased translation in response to stimulation.
Differentially expressed genes have previously been seen in unstimulated peripheral immune cells from children with ASD compared to TD [55, 56]. However, few studies have looked specifically at monocytes in ASD or how these cells respond to activation. Our findings of increased expression of FAS, NFKB1, and TAB3 after TLR4 stimulation highlights increased innate immune responses in ASD monocytes, specifically activation of NF-κB which mediates proinflammatory responses [57,58,59,60]. NFKB1 encodes for a subunit of the transcription factor NF-κB [54, 58] and DNA binding by NF-κB leads to production of many inflammatory mediators, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα . NF-κB is also downstream of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway, which has been implicated previously in ASD and recently found to be overexpressed in leukocytes isolated from ASD toddlers [61, 62]. Increased DNA binding of NF-κB has been seen previously in PBMC of children with ASD . Furthermore, NF-κB was elevated in post-mortem brain of ASD and localized to microglia, astroglia and neurons . Increased IKKα kinase, a subunit of the enzyme complex that assists in activating NF-κB, was also seen in the post-mortem ASD brain. However, there were no differences in protein expression or phosphorylation of NF-κB . Recently, monocytes from children with ASD were found to have increased IL-17RA expression, and signaling through this receptor led to NF-κB phosphorylation and increased inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) production .
After activation, monocytes from TD children showed decreased expression of genes involved in protein synthesis and translation, changes not observed in monocytes from children on the autism spectrum, regardless of diagnosis. Controlling protein levels is essential for proper function of cells, and many intrinsic mechanisms exist for regulating translation in response to cellular stressors [66, 67]. By limiting the rate of general translation initiation and increasing translation of specific mRNAs, the cell is able to reprogram gene expression to maintain proteostasis after an integrated stress response . In this study, monocytes from TD individuals decreased expression of protein translational machinery after both treatments. Translation genes decreased after LPS, LTA, or both treatments include eukaryotic initiation factors (EIF2D and EIF3E). In addition, ribosomal biogenesis was significantly decreased in stimulated TD monocytes, including expression of genes that code for several ribosomal proteins and mitochondrial ribosomal proteins. Composition and abundance of ribosomes are recognized to be involved in the regulation of protein translation .
In striking contrast, monocytes from children with AD and PDDNOS did not exhibit significant decreases in expression of genes that encode translational machinery. Genetic mutations leading to dysregulated pathways of protein synthesis are common in monogenic forms of NDD such as Fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis (TSC) type 1 and 2, and Cowden syndrome . For example, in Fragile X the FMR1 gene is silenced, preventing production of FMRP, an RNA-binding protein involved in repression of translation [70, 71]. Altered expression of translational machinery has also been implicated in animal models of ASD. For example, overexpressing the translation initiation factor eIF4E in mice induced autistic-like behaviors and pathophysiological changes to synapses in the brain . Furthermore, conditional overexpression of eIF4E in microglia alone, but not neurons or astrocytes, led to ASD-like behaviors in male mice suggesting that dysregulated translation in innate immune cells in the brain is sufficient to cause behavioral abnormalities . Endogenous binding proteins (4E-BPs) sequester eIF4E, and lack of these proteins increases and dysregulates translation [69, 74]. 4E-BP2 knock-out mice exhibited social deficits and repetitive behaviors, and inhibition of eIF4E activity was sufficient to reverse social deficits . Taken together, these studies suggest that dysregulated translation and protein synthesis may be a mechanism that contributes to ASD.
We next sought to identify any overlap of genes uniquely regulated in TD, AD, and PDDNOS monocytes during TLR activation with dysregulated genes across published brain lists. DEGs in the ASD brain have significant overlap with genes involved in mitochondrial translational regulation and cellular protein complex disassembly. Overlap analyses also highlighted several ASD risk genes identified in the SFARI dataset. Interestingly, increased genes associated with innate immune cell activation after TLR4 stimulation overlapped with increased immune activation processes in brains from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Psychiatric co-morbidities are common in IBD  with increasing evidence in animal models that microglia activation and neuroinflammation may accompany these disorders [77, 78]. Psychiatric disorders are also associated with intestinal barrier dysfunction and altered gut microbiota (dysbiosis), which may influence the gut-brain axis and contribute to the psychiatric issues seen in IBD . Gut dysfunction and dysbiosis is also a common co-morbidity in ASD  and our findings may suggest a shared mechanism in brain disorders and inflammatory gut diseases.
Despite the significant results obtained, this study had several limitations including a relatively small sample size, a single time point after stimulation, and RNA sequencing approach. We chose the CD14+ isolation and the timing of stimulation to align with our previous study . At 24 h, we may be missing early responses, or later regulatory responses may be camouflaging early dysregulated gene expression. Based on our findings, further time-course studies and/or stimulation with varying concentrations warrant investigation. We chose to identify differential expression using QuantSeq which sequences only the 3′ end of mRNA. This approach allows for quantitative differential gene analysis with the advantage of lower sequencing costs. However, this approach does not allow for the analysis of differential splicing, differential transcript usage or the analysis of non-coding RNAs. The levels of measured transcripts could also be influenced by RNA stability and degradation changes; additionally, transcript levels do not always reflect functional protein differences. Future work could explore how differences in expression of the translation machinery genes impact protein expression.
To our knowledge, this is the first investigation of gene expression after stimulation of monocytes from children with ASD. We identified a unique inflammatory signature in LPS-stimulated monocytes from children with AD when compared to TD controls, however, this inflammatory signature was not seen in PDDNOS. Moreover, we found decreased expression of genes for protein synthesis and transcriptional machinery after 24 h of stimulation in TD monocytes. This phenomenon was not seen in the either AD or PDDNOS monocytes, which suggests a failure to down-regulate translation after immune activation in monocytes from children on the autism spectrum, perhaps contributing to a failure in immune resolution/control. DEGs from this study shared some overlap with genes previously found altered in brains of psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders, suggesting peripheral gene expression changes mirror at least a subset of changes in the brain. Collectively, these data support a role for innate immune dysfunction in ASD through altered immune activation in a subset of ASD and aberrant translational control in ASD monocytes.
Data and code availability
The accession number for the RNA-sequencing raw data reported in this paper is NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus: GSE140702. Code is available at: https://github.com/ciernialab/RNAseq_Ashwood_2021.
Baio J, Wiggins L, Christensen DL, Maenner MJ, Daniels J, Warren Z, et al. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2014. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018;67:1–23.
Ciernia AV, LaSalle J. The landscape of DNA methylation amid a perfect storm of autism aetiologies. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17:411.
Wu S, Ding Y, Wu F, Li R, Xie G, Hou J, et al. Family history of autoimmune diseases is associated with an increased risk of autism in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;55:322–32.
Chen S-W, Zhong X-W, Jiang L-N, Zheng X-Y, Xiong Y-Q, Ma S-J, et al. Maternal autoimmune diseases and the risk of autism spectrum disorders in offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behavioural Brain Res. 2016;296:61–9.
Chen M-H, Su T-P, Chen Y-S, Hsu J-W, Huang K-L, Chang W-H, et al. Comorbidity of allergic and autoimmune diseases in patients with autism spectrum disorder: a nationwide population-based study. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2013;7:205–12.
Zerbo O, Leong A, Barcellos L, Bernal P, Fireman B, Croen LA. Immune mediated conditions in autism spectrum disorders. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;46:232–6.
Xu G, Snetselaar LG, Jing J, Liu B, Strathearn L, Bao W. Association of food allergy and other allergic conditions with autism spectrum disorder in children. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e180279–e.
Lyall K, Van de Water J, Ashwood P, Hertz-Picciotto I. Asthma and allergies in children with autism spectrum disorders: results from the CHARGE study. Autism Res. 2015;8:567–74.
Kotey S, Ertel K, Whitcomb B. Co-occurrence of autism and asthma in a nationally-representative sample of children in the United States. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44:3083–8.
Doshi-Velez F, Avillach P, Palmer N, Bousvaros A, Ge Y, Fox K, et al. Prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease among patients with autism spectrum disorders. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21:2281–8.
Mostafa G, Hamza R, El-Shahawi H. Allergic manifestations in autistic children: relation to disease severity. J Pediatr Neurol. 2008;6:115–23.
Shibata A, Hitomi Y, Kambayashi Y, Hibino Y, Yamazaki M, Mitoma J, et al. Epidemiological study on the involvements of environmental factors and allergy in child mental health using the Autism Screening Questionnaire. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2013;7:132–40.
Maenner MJ, Arneson CL, Levy SE, Kirby RS, Nicholas JS, Durkin MS. Brief report: association between behavioral features and gastrointestinal problems among children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42:1520–5.
Sweeten TL, Posey DJ, McDougle CJ. High blood monocyte counts and neopterin levels in children with autistic disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:1691–3.
Croonenberghs J, Bosmans E, Deboutte D, Kenis G, Maes M. Activation of the inflammatory response system in autism. Neuropsychobiology 2002;45:1–6.
Enstrom AM, Onore CE, Van de Water JA, Ashwood P. Differential monocyte responses to TLR ligands in children with autism spectrum disorders. Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24:64–71.
Nadeem A, Ahmad SF, Attia SM, Bakheet SA, Al-Harbi NO, Al-Ayadhi LY. Activation of IL-17 receptor leads to increased oxidative inflammation in peripheral monocytes of autistic children. Brain, Behav, Immun. 2018;67:335–44.
Ashwood P, Corbett BA, Kantor A, Schulman H, Van de Water J, Amaral DG. In search of cellular immunophenotypes in the blood of children with autism. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19299.
Emanuele E, Orsi P, Boso M, Broglia D, Brondino N, Barale F, et al. Low-grade endotoxemia in patients with severe autism. Neurosci Lett. 2010;471:162–5.
Ashwood P, Krakowiak P, Hertz-Picciotto I, Hansen R, Pessah I, Van de Water J. Elevated plasma cytokines in autism spectrum disorders provide evidence of immune dysfunction and are associated with impaired behavioral outcome. Brain Behav Immun. 2011;25:40–5.
Suzuki K, Matsuzaki H, Iwata K, Kameno Y, Shimmura C, Kawai S, et al. Plasma cytokine profiles in subjects with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20470.
Morgan JT, Chana G, Pardo CA, Achim C, Semendeferi K, Buckwalter J, et al. Microglial activation and increased microglial density observed in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in autism. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;68:368–76.
Morgan JT, Chana G, Abramson I, Semendeferi K, Courchesne E, Everall IP. Abnormal microglial–neuronal spatial organization in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in autism. Brain Res. 2012;1456:72–81.
Li X, Chauhan A, Sheikh AM, Patil S, Chauhan V, Li XM, et al. Elevated immune response in the brain of autistic patients. J Neuroimmunol. 2009;207:111–6.
Vargas DL, Nascimbene C, Krishnan C, Zimmerman AW, Pardo CA. Neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:67–81.
Voineagu I, Wang X, Johnston P, Lowe JK, Tian Y, Horvath S, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of autistic brain reveals convergent molecular pathology. Nature 2011;474:380–4.
Garbett K, Ebert PJ, Mitchell A, Lintas C, Manzi B, Mirnics K, et al. Immune transcriptome alterations in the temporal cortex of subjects with autism. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;30:303–11.
Chow ML, Pramparo T, Winn ME, Barnes CC, Li HR, Weiss L, et al. Age-dependent brain gene expression and copy number anomalies in autism suggest distinct pathological processes at young versus mature ages. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002592.
Gupta S, Ellis SE, Ashar FN, Moes A, Bader JS, Zhan J, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals dysregulation of innate immune response genes and neuronal activity-dependent genes in autism. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5748.
Pratt L, Ni L, Ponzio NM, Jonakait GM. Maternal inflammation promotes fetal microglial activation and increased cholinergic expression in the fetal basal forebrain: role of interleukin-6. Pediatr Res. 2013;74:393–401.
Garay PA, Hsiao EY, Patterson PH, McAllister AK. Maternal immune activation causes age- and region-specific changes in brain cytokines in offspring throughout development. Brain, Behav, Immun. 2013;31:54–68.
Choi GB, Yim YS, Wong H, Kim S, Kim H, Kim SV, et al. The maternal interleukin-17a pathway in mice promotes autism-like phenotypes in offspring. Science 2016;351:933–9.
Heo Y, Zhang Y, Gao D, Miller VM, Lawrence DA. Aberrant immune responses in a mouse with behavioral disorders. PLOS ONE. 2011;6:e20912.
Onore CE, Schwartzer JJ, Careaga M, Berman RF, Ashwood P. Maternal immune activation leads to activated inflammatory macrophages in offspring. Brain Behav Immun. 2014;38:220–6.
Onore CE, Careaga M, Babineau BA, Schwartzer JJ, Berman RF, Ashwood P. Inflammatory macrophage phenotype in BTBR T+tf/J mice. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:158.
Kawasaki T, Kawai T. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:461.
Gao W, Xiong Y, Li Q, Yang H. Inhibition of toll-like receptor signaling as a promising therapy for inflammatory diseases: a journey from molecular to nano therapeutics. Front. Physiol. 2017;8:508.
Nordahl CW, Lange N, Li DD, Barnett LA, Lee A, Buonocore MH, et al. Brain enlargement is associated with regression in preschool-age boys with autism spectrum disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:20195–200.
Lord C, Pickles A, McLennan J, Rutter M, Bregman J, Folstein S, et al. Diagnosing autism: analyses of data from the Autism Diagnostic Interview. J Autism Dev Disord. 1997;27:501–17.
Joseph RM, Tager-Flusberg H, Lord C. Cognitive profiles and social-communicative functioning in children with autism spectrum disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002;43:807–21.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
Berument SK, Rutter M, Lord C, Pickles A, Bailey A. Autism screening questionnaire: diagnostic validity. Br J Psychiatry. 1999;175:444–51.
Walker LSC-DA, Rasquin-Weber A Questionnaire on pediatric gastrointestinal symptoms, Rome III version (QPGS-RIII). Rome III: the functional gastrointestinal disorders. McLean, Virginia: Degnon Associates, Inc.; 2006.
Gandal MJ, Zhang P, Hadjimichael E, Walker RL, Chen C, Liu S, et al. Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science 2018;362:eaat8127.
Parikshak NN, Swarup V, Belgard TG, Irimia M, Ramaswami G, Gandal MJ, et al. Genome-wide changes in lncRNA, splicing, and regional gene expression patterns in autism. Nature 2016;540:423–7.
Gupta S, Ellis SE, Ashar FN, Moes A, Bader JS, Zhan J, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals dysregulation of innate immune response genes and neuronal activity-dependent genes in autism. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5748.
Gilissen C, Hehir-Kwa JY, Thung DT, van de Vorst M, van Bon BW, Willemsen MH, et al. Genome sequencing identifies major causes of severe intellectual disability. Nature 2014;511:344–7.
Iossifov I, O’Roak BJ, Sanders SJ, Ronemus M, Krumm N, Levy D, et al. The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder. Nature 2014;515:216–21.
Kochinke K, Zweier C, Nijhof B, Fenckova M, Cizek P, Honti F, et al. Systematic phenomics analysis deconvolutes genes mutated in intellectual disability into biologically coherent modules. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98:149–64.
Miller JA, Woltjer RL, Goodenbour JM, Horvath S, Geschwind DH. Genes and pathways underlying regional and cell type changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med. 2013;5:48.
Sanders SJ, He X, Willsey AJ, Ercan-Sencicek AG, Samocha KE, Cicek AE, et al. Insights into autism spectrum disorder genomic architecture and biology from 71 risk loci. Neuron 2015;87:1215–33.
Autism Spectrum Disorders Working Group of The Psychiatric Genomics, Consortium. Meta-analysis of GWAS of over 16,000 individuals with autism spectrum disorder highlights a novel locus at 10q24.32 and a significant overlap with schizophrenia. Mol Autism. 2017;8:21.
Stelzer G, Rosen N, Plaschkes I, Zimmerman S, Twik M, Fishilevich S, et al. The genecards suite: from gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses. Curr Protoc Bioinforma. 2016;54:1.30.1–1.3.
Bagchi A, Herrup EA, Warren HS, Trigilio J, Shin H-S, Valentine C, et al. MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent pathways in synergy, priming, and tolerance between TLR agonists. J Immunol. 2007;178:1164.
Gregg JP, Lit L, Baron CA, Hertz-Picciotto I, Walker W, Davis RA, et al. Gene expression changes in children with autism. Genomics 2008;91:22–9.
Kong SW, Collins CD, Shimizu-Motohashi Y, Holm IA, Campbell MG, Lee IH, et al. Characteristics and predictive value of blood transcriptome signature in males with autism spectrum disorders. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49475.
Park DR, Thomsen AR, Frevert CW, Pham U, Skerrett SJ, Kiener PA, et al. Fas (CD95) induces proinflammatory cytokine responses by human monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages. J Immunol. 2003;170:6209.
Liu T, Zhang L, Joo D, Sun S-C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2017;2:17023.
Deguine J, Barton GM. MyD88: a central player in innate immune signaling. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:97.
Kanayama A, Seth RB, Sun L, Ea C-K, Hong M, Shaito A, et al. TAB2 and TAB3 activate the NF-κB pathway through binding to Polyubiquitin chains. Mol Cell. 2004;15:535–48.
Gazestani VH, Pramparo T, Nalabolu S, Kellman BP, Murray S, Lopez L, et al. A perturbed gene network containing PI3K–AKT, RAS–ERK and WNT–β-catenin pathways in leukocytes is linked to ASD genetics and symptom severity. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:1624–34.
Onore C, Yang H, Van de Water J, Ashwood P. Dynamic Akt/mTOR signaling in children with autism spectrum disorder. Front Pediatrics. 2017;5:43.
Naik US, Gangadharan C, Abbagani K, Nagalla B, Dasari N, Manna SK. A study of nuclear transcription factor-kappa B in childhood autism. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19488–e.
Young AMH, Campbell E, Lynch S, Suckling J, Powis SJ. Aberrant NF-kappaB expression in autism spectrum condition: a mechanism for neuroinflammation. Front Psychiatry. 2011;2:27.
Malik M, Tauqeer Z, Sheikh AM, Wen G, Nagori A, Yang K, et al. NF-κB signaling in the brain of autistic subjects. Mediators Inflamm. 2011;2011:785265.
Dalla Venezia N, Vincent A, Marcel V, Catez F, Diaz J-J. Emerging role of eukaryote ribosomes in translational control. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1226.
Sonenberg N, Hinnebusch AG. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell 2009;136:731–45.
Costa-Mattioli M, Walter P. The integrated stress response: from mechanism to disease. Science 2020;368:eaat5314.
Kelleher RJ, Bear MF. The autistic neuron: troubled translation? Cell 2008;135:401–6.
Aryal S, Klann E. Turning up translation in fragile X syndrome. Science 2018;361:648.
Laggerbauer B, Ostareck D, Keidel EM, Ostareck-Lederer A, Fischer U. Evidence that fragile X mental retardation protein is a negative regulator of translation. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:329–38.
Santini E, Huynh TN, MacAskill AF, Carter AG, Pierre P, Ruggero D, et al. Exaggerated translation causes synaptic and behavioural aberrations associated with autism. Nature 2013;493:411–5.
Xu ZX, Kim GH, Tan JW, Riso AE, Sun Y, Xu EY, et al. Elevated protein synthesis in microglia causes autism-like synaptic and behavioral aberrations. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1797.
Ruggero D, Sonenberg N. The Akt of translational control. Oncogene 2005;24:7426–34.
Gkogkas CG, Khoutorsky A, Ran I, Rampakakis E, Nevarko T, Weatherill DB, et al. Autism-related deficits via dysregulated eIF4E-dependent translational control. Nature 2012;493:371.
Bhamre R, Sawrav S, Adarkar S, Sakaria R, Bhatia SJ. Psychiatric comorbidities in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Indian J Gastroenterol: Off J Indian Soc Gastroenterol. 2018;37:307–12.
Zonis S, Pechnick RN, Ljubimov VA, Mahgerefteh M, Wawrowsky K, Michelsen KS, et al. Chronic intestinal inflammation alters hippocampal neurogenesis. J Neuroinflammation. 2015;12:65.
Dempsey E, Abautret-Daly Á, Docherty NG, Medina C, Harkin A. Persistent central inflammation and region specific cellular activation accompany depression- and anxiety-like behaviours during the resolution phase of experimental colitis. Brain, Behav, Immun. 2019;80:616–32.
Kelly JR, Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Clarke G, Hyland NP. Breaking down the barriers: the gut microbiome, intestinal permeability and stress-related psychiatric disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:392.
Hughes HK, Rose D, Ashwood P. The gut microbiota and dysbiosis in autism spectrum disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018;18:81.
We would like to thank the participants in the study and their families. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1650042, National Institute of Child Health and Disease (R01HD090214), the National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH116383, R01MH118209), Autism Speaks Foundation, Autism Research Institute, Grace Gardner Johnson and Jane B. Johnson, Brain Foundation, Jonty Foundation, CTSC Pilot Translational and Clinical Studies Program, A Child/Lifespan Health Award, and the UC Davis MIND Institute.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hughes, H.K., Rowland, M.E., Onore, C.E. et al. Dysregulated gene expression associated with inflammatory and translation pathways in activated monocytes from children with autism spectrum disorder. Transl Psychiatry 12, 39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01766-0