Several studies suggested that 5-HT2A receptor (5-HT2AR) blockade may provide a more favorable efficacy and side-effect profile to antipsychotic treatment. We hypothesized that a combined haloperidol (a D2/3 receptor (D2/3R) antagonist) and MDL-100,907 (a 5-HT2AR antagonist) treatment would reverse the side effects and the neurochemical alterations induced by haloperidol alone and would potentialize its efficacy. We thus chronically treated male Mdr1a knock-out rats with several doses of haloperidol alone or in combination with a saturating dose of a MDL-100,907. Receptor occupancy at clinically relevant levels was validated with a dual-radiotracer in-vivo SPECT imaging of D2/3R and 5-HT2AR occupancy. Experimental tests of efficacy (dizocilpine-disrupted prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex) and side effects (catalepsy, vacuous chewing movements) were performed. Finally, a second dual-radiotracer in-vivo SPECT scan assessed the neurochemical changes induced by the chronic treatments. Chronic haloperidol failed to reverse PPI disruption induced by dizocilpine, whilst administration of MDL-100,907 along with haloperidol was associated with a reversal of the effect of dizocilpine. Haloperidol at 0.5 mg/kg/day and at 1 mg/kg/day induced catalepsy that was significantly alleviated (by ~50%) by co-treatment with MDL-100,907 but only at 0.5 mg/kg/day dose of haloperidol. Chronic haloperidol treatment, event at doses as low as 0.1 mg/kg/day induced a significant upregulation of the D2/3R in the striatum (by over 40% in the nucleus accumbens and over 20% in the caudate-putamen nuclei), that was not reversed by MDL-100,907. Finally, an upregulation of 5-HT2AR after chronic haloperidol treatment at a moderate dose only (0.25 mg/kg/day) was demonstrated in frontal cortical regions and the ventral tegmental area. Overall, a partial contribution of a 5-HT2AR antagonism to the efficacy and side-effect profile of antipsychotic agents is suggested.
Antipsychotic medication constitutes the cornerstone of schizophrenia treatment. Antipsychotic agents are classified into typical (mainly D2 receptor, D2R, antagonists with relatively low affinity for other receptors) and atypical (with affinity for a wide spectrum of receptors, apart from the D2R) (reviewed in ref. 1). D2R antagonism is a central element of antipsychotic activity2. Indeed, for the majority of antipsychotic agents, a D2R occupancy between 65% and 80% of the total receptor pool in the striatum is associated with optimal antipsychotic efficacy. An occupancy below this level produces no antipsychotic effect, whereas a higher occupancy is associated with the appearance of—mainly—extrapyramidal side effects (EPS)1.
When compared to typical agents, atypical antipsychotics possess a lower propensity to cause EPS3,4. This suggests that a better understanding of the mechanism of action of atypical antipsychotics could lead to the design of a more tolerable, hence, more efficient treatment of schizophrenia. Despite extensive efforts, the neurochemical and/or molecular bases of atypicality have long been a matter of debate. One popular theory proposes that a high 5-HT2A vs. D2R occupancy is a defining characteristic of atypical antipsychotics and indeed, the majority of them has a high affinity for the 5-HT2A receptor (5-HT2AR)5. Whereas 5-HT2AR antagonism per se is not considered as conferring antipsychotic efficacy6, a combined blockade of D2 and 5-HT2AR has been proposed to be important for the efficacy and the reduced side effect liability of atypical versus typical drugs1,2,7. The existing literature in the field is controversial and a systematic approach to the question of the implication of a 5-HT2AR antagonism in antipsychotic atypicality is needed. Indeed, many studies have assessed the effect of 5-HT2AR antagonism in association with D2R blockade, notably by haloperidol, on a wide spectrum of behavioral paradigms of antipsychotic efficacy and side effect liability in rodents. However, in most studies, a single and, in most cases, saturating dose of haloperidol has been used7,8,9,10,11,12. In addition, to our knowledge, no study has simultaneously assessed multiple aspects of antipsychotic efficacy and side effect profile.
In the present study, we chronically treated male rats with several doses of haloperidol alone or in combination with a saturating dose of a selective 5-HT2AR antagonist, MDL-100,907. The occupancy of D2/3R at clinically relevant levels, from subtherapeutic doses occupying <65% of the D2/3R in the striatum, to doses within the optimal therapeutic “window” of D2R occupancy (65–80%) and saturating, supratherapeutic doses (frequently associated to EPS), was validated using a dual-radiotracer single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging approach to assess D2/3R and 5-HT2AR occupancies, simultaneously, during the same scan session13. In parallel, the effects of adding 5-HT2A to different levels of D2/3R occupancies were investigated using a series of preclinical tests of efficacy (dizocilpine—also known as MK801—disrupted prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex) and side effects (catalepsy, vacuous chewing movements (VCM)). Finally, a second dual-radiotracer in-vivo SPECT scan was performed following a 4-week treatment period to assess neurochemical changes at the level of D2/3R and 5-HT2AR binding with respect to the chronic treatment regimes. Our hypothesis was that adding 5-HT2AR antagonism, a putative substrate of antipsychotic atypicality, could enhance the efficacy of haloperidol at the experimental tasks and alleviate, at least partially, EPS.
Materials and methods
A total of 136 male adult Mdr1a knock-out rats (weighing 300–500 g), were used. P-glycoprotein knock-out in this strain increases the permeability of the blood–brain barrier, allowing in-vivo 5-HT2AR imaging with [125I]R91150, which is impeded in wild-type animals due to the low brain absorption of this radiotracer13,14,15. The animals were housed at constant room temperature (21 ± 1 °C) under a regular light/dark schedule (light 07:00–19:00). Food and water were freely available.
All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Swiss Federal Law and approved by the local authority on Animal Experimentation.
Experimental procedures outline
The timeline of the study is graphically presented in Fig. 1. An initial ex-vivo study was performed to determine the dose-occupancy of haloperidol and MDL-100,907 at D2/3R and 5-HT2AR, respectively, in our model. Using subcutaneously implanted osmotic minipumps, ranging doses of haloperidol and MDL-100,907 were administered (in separate groups of rats) to produce chronic and stable levels of D2/3R and 5-HT2AR occupancies. At the end of a 4-week treatment period, ex-vivo receptor binding measurements were performed to establish the dose-occupancy curve for haloperidol and MDL-100,907. Based on the ex-vivo D2/3R occupancy results, doses of haloperidol that achieved: (1) subtherapeutic/at the lower spectrum of the optimal occupancy window, (2) therapeutic levels of D2R occupancy (within the 65–80% occupancy window) and, (3) supratherapeutic doses associated to a side effect risk (>80% of occupancy)1, were selected and used alone or in combination with a 5-HT2AR saturating dose of MDL-100,907. This allowed to compare, in vivo, their chronic effects both on behavioral tasks designed to assess clinical efficacy and EPS liability and on D2/3R and 5-HT2AR binding.
Osmotic minipump implantation procedure and chronic drug treatment
Haloperidol and MDL-100,907 (Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland) were diluted in a 50% DMSO solution in NaCl 0.9% (50% v/v). MDL-100,907 was initially diluted in a few drops of a 10% acetic acid solution (constituting <5% of the final volume of the DMSO/NaCl solution). For both haloperidol and MDL-100,907, the doses used in the initial ex-vivo dose-occupancy curve estimation study ranged from 0 to 1 mg/kg/day. The haloperidol/MDL-100,907 doses used in the subsequent in-vivo study (hereon abbreviated as Hx/My with x and y being the dose of each drug in mg/kg/day) and the number of rats (n) in each dosage were as follows: H0/M0 (n = 12), H0.1/M0 (n = 8), H0.1/M0.5 (subtherapeutic dose of haloperidol) (n = 7), H0.25/M0 (n = 7), H0.25/M0.5 (n = 7) (therapeutic dose), H0.5/M0 (n = 7), H0.5/M0.5 (n = 7), H1/M0 (n = 12), and H1/M0.5 (n = 12) (supratherapeutic doses). The doses employed in the in vivo study were informed by the ex vivo dose-occupancy estimation study. The rats were randomly assigned into dose groups by shuffling the rat ID/dose labels. The investigators who performed the experiments were totally blinded to the group and dose assignment of rats. Investigators who analyzed the results were aware of the group-assignment but blinded to the dose assignment to each group. Exclusion criteria included signs of local (at the surgical site) and generalized infection, dehydration, rapid weight loss, and lethargy.
Osmotic minipump (2ML4, Alzet, Cupertino, CA, USA) implantation, localized between the scapulae, was performed under isoflurane anesthesia (2.5–3%) and buprenorphine analgesia (0.02 mg/kg sc; Temgesic, Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc.). For a more detailed description, please see the supplemental materials and methods.
At the end of the 28 days treatment period, the minipumps were removed to end the chronic administration period.
The dizocilpine-disrupted PPI of the startle reflex was performed as a proxy to the therapeutic efficacy of the chronic treatment16,17,18, between 16 and 19 days following implantation of the osmotic minipumps. The protocol described here19 was followed, including two habituation sessions (Days 1 and 2) and a saline-pretreatment test session (Day 3). Dizocilpine (0.15 mg/kg) was injected as pretreatment on Day 4. The amplitude of startle responses was recorded in all trials. The magnitude of PPI was calculated as a percent inhibition of the startle amplitude in the pulse-alone trial18,20, using two prepulse sound volumes (80 and 85 dB).
Catalepsy is indicative of the potential of a pharmacological agent to induce extrapyramidal symptoms1,7. At 25 days following minipump implantation, catalepsy was assessed over a 3-min period as described previously21 (see supplemental Materials and Methods).
VCM are purposeless, vertical jaw movements directed towards no object. They are considered a rodent model of antipsychotic drug-induced tardive dyskinesia1,7,11,22,23. The assessment of VCM took place 5 days after the removal of the osmotic minipumps, i.e. the end of the treatment period. To assess VCM, rats were placed in a plexiglass restraining tube. After 2 min of habituation, VCM were recorded over a period of 2 min24,25.
Ex-vivo receptor-binding measurements and in-vivo imaging
Ex-vivo estimation of receptor occupancy by haloperidol and MDL-100,907
Preparation of [123I]IBZM and [125I]R91150 was performed as previously described13,14,15. In the ex-vivo dose-occupancy curve estimations, rats were administered with [123I]IBZM and [125I]R91150 to concurrently measure D2/3R and 5-HT2AR occupancy, respectively. At 28 days of treatment, rats were anesthetized using isoflurane anesthesia (4% for induction, 2.5% for maintenance) and injected with 6.48 ± 0.34 MBq of [123I]IBZM or 6.98 ± 0.98 MBq of [123I]R91150 (with respect to the treatment, haloperidol or MDL-100,907, respectively). At 120 min post-injection, rats were euthanized by decapitation, their brain removed, and their striatum, frontal cortex, and cerebellum dissected and weighed. Radioactivity in the dissected brain regions was immediately measured in an automated gamma counting system (expressed in kBq/g of tissue weight) for the radiotracer labeled with 123I. Radioactivity was decay-corrected to the time of the brain dissection.
For the ex-vivo study, the standardized uptake ratio (SUR) for each radiotracer in the striatum and the frontal cortex was measured using the radioactivity measured in the gamma counting system as follows: SUR = (radioactivity in the target-region)/(radioactivity in the cerebellum)–1. The % occupancy (O) of the D2/3R and the 5-HT2AR from their respective antagonists was estimated using the following formula: O (%) = (1−SUR/SURCON)*100, where SUR corresponds to the value obtained from an individual study in which a dose of antagonist was employed, while SURCON corresponds to the average value obtained from the control animals in which no antagonist was administered.
In-vivo imaging experiments
Dual-radiotracer SPECT imaging13 was performed in the context of the main in-vivo study described in this paper to assess the level of D2/3R and 5-HT2AR occupancy by haloperidol and MDL-100,907, and the binding of D2/3R and 5-HT2AR after chronic treatment with these agents. In vivo dual radiotracer SPECT was performed as described previously13. At the end of the 28-day treatment period, the first dual-radiotracer SPECT scan was performed, to measure the occupancy of the D2/3R and the 5-HT2AR by their respective antagonists. One week later, an identical dual-radiotracer SPECT scan was performed to index the density of the D2/3R and the 5-HT2AR. Rats were simultaneously injected with a mixture of [123I]IBZM (32.7 ± 8.2 MBq) and [125I]R91150 (26.9 ± 6 MBq) over 30 s. The detailed scan procedures were exactly the same as described here13,15.
SPECT image analysis was performed as described previously13. A volume-of-interest (VOI) template incorporated in PMOD26 was used to extract the radioactivity from each brain VOI and the cerebellum (CER), which was used as reference region. SUR values from the first (to estimate the receptor occupancies by the antagonist treatment) and the second SPECT scan (to estimate the alteration in receptors’ binding due to the chronic treatment) were estimated as follows: (radioactivity in the target VOI)/(radioactivity in CER)−1. For the estimation of D2/3R occupancies using in-vivo imaging with [123I]IBZM, a 0.55 value was subtracted from the SUR and SURCON values to account for the difference in the non-displaceable binding between the striatum (target region) and the cerebellum (reference region) for this radiotracer15 (please see the supplemental materials and methods for a more detailed description).
Normal distribution of data was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Post-hoc analysis was performed when appropriate. For the analysis of the PPI, as well as for the analysis of the alterations in D2/3 binding, a multi-variate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was employed with haloperidol and MDL-100,907 dose as the independent factors. For non-normally distributed data, non-parametric tests (Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney) were employed. A sample size analysis with the graphical Douglas Altman’s nomogram was performed27. For 5-HT2AR binding, parametric images of SUR were compared between groups using the SPM12 software (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL, London, UK) and the Small Animal Molecular Imaging Toolbox28 (SAMIT, Groningen, Netherlands) in Matlab (R2019, Mathworks Inc, USA). An uncorrected p at 0.001 with a cluster size threshold of 100 voxels was employed29,30. All the statistical tests were two-sided. No adjustment for multiple comparisons was employed. Throughout the manuscript, “average” refers to the mean value. All experiments were performed once. All data associated with this manuscript is available upon request to the corresponding author.
Occupancy of the D2/3R and the 5-HT2AR by haloperidol and MDL-100,907
Figure 2a, b present the dose-occupancy curves for haloperidol from the in vivo and the initial ex vivo occupancy estimations, respectively. Both in vivo and ex vivo dose-occupancy curve estimation approaches yielded similar results. For haloperidol, a 0.1 mg/kg/day dose leads to a D2/3R occupancy of around 45% (Fig. 2a). A dose of 0.25 mg/kg/day leads to a D2/3R occupancy of a little <80%, while the doses of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg/day lead towards saturations of more than 85–90% of the D2/3R in the Caudate-Putamen (CP; Fig. 2a). The ex-vivo dose-occupancy curve for MDL-100,907 at frontal 5-HT2AR is shown in Fig. 2c. The MDL-100,907 dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day, which produces an almost total saturation of the frontal 5-HT2AR, was subsequently employed in the in-vivo study. Haloperidol did not induce 5-HT2AR occupancy and MDL-100,907 did not induce D2/3R occupancy at any dose (data not shown).
Effect of chronic haloperidol and MDL-100,907 on the dizocilpine-disrupted PPI of the startle
In control animals (H0M0, neither dizocilpine nor haloperidol/MDL-100,907 treatment) the PPI (both auditory stimuli volumes combined) was, in average, 62% (Fig. 3a). As expected, dizocilpine disrupted PPI in control rats, diminishing it, in average, to 31% (p < 0.01). Given that the hypothesis under evaluation concerned the ability of the various combinations of haloperidol and MDL-100,907 to reverse the effect of dizocilpine on PPI, a MANOVA was performed only on the dizocilpine-treated rats, using the PPI (%) responses after 80 (Fig. 3a) and 85 dB (Fig. 3b) as dependent variables and the haloperidol and MDL-100,907 doses as factors. When added to the various doses of haloperidol, a significant effect of MDL-100,907 treatment (p < 0.05) on dizocilpine-induced PPI disruption was observed, at least at the lowest doses of haloperidol (0.1 and 0.25 mg/kg/day). In addition, a significant interaction between the haloperidol and MDL-100,907 factors was observed (p < 0.05). Post hoc analysis using a protected Fischer’s least significant differences (LSD) test failed to demonstrate signification differences between any of the individual haloperidol and MDL-100,907 dosage combinations and the control group.
Haloperidol-induced catalepsy reversal by MDL-100,907
Chronic haloperidol doses up to 0.25 mg/kg/day, alone or in combination with 1 mg/kg/day MDL-100,907, had no effect on catalepsy (Fig. 3c). In contrast, haloperidol doses of 0.5 mg/kg/day and 1 mg/kg/day induced a strong catalepsy, measured as the time elapsed between the placement of the animal on the grid and their first paw movements (111.4 ± 52.5 and 137.8 ± 79.1 s to first movement, respectively, Fig. 3c). This difference was statistically significant as revealed by a Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001 and post hoc Mann–Whitney tests p < 0.05). Adding a 5-HT2AR antagonism alleviated the cataleptic effect of haloperidol at 0.5 mg/kg/day (40.3 ± 26.9 s, p < 0.05) but not at 1 mg/kg/day (122.1 ± 92.2 s, p > 0.05).
Haloperidol-induced vacuous VCM
A chronic treatment with doses of haloperidol of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg/day induced a significant increase in the number of the VCM (18.7 ± 5.8 and 13.3 ± 8.2, respectively) when compared to vehicle-treated rats (2.4 ± 2.11, Kruskal–Wallis, p < 0.001 and Mann–Whitney test for post hoc comparisons, p < 0.05). Lower haloperidol doses of 0.1 and 0.25 mg/kg/day induced no VCM. On the other hand, MDL-100,907 treatment had no effect on this phenomenon, i.e. did not manage to alleviate the haloperidol-induced VCM syndrome (Fig. 3d).
Alteration in D2/3R and 5-HT2AR binding after chronic antagonism
Figure 4a and b show the effect of chronic treatment with the various doses of haloperidol and MDL-100,907 on D2/3R binding in the CP and the Nucleus Accumbens (NAc), respectively. All doses of haloperidol induced a significant up-regulation of D2/3 binding in both regions compared to the vehicle-treated groups, as measured with [123I]IBZM, one week after the end of the treatment period (p < 0.001 for the effect of haloperidol using a two-way MANOVA and significant post hoc tests of all doses against the vehicle-treated group). The addition of MDL-100,907 had no effect on this haloperidol-induced D2/3 up-regulation in either the CP or the NAc (Fig. 4a, b). For the analysis of D2/3R-binding alterations, only VOI-wise analysis was performed, given that the distribution of [123I]IBZM binding is restricted in the NAc and the CP. Statistical comparison of the effect of the different treatment doses on [125I]R91150 binding was performed at the voxel level using SPM. Only the haloperidol dose of 0.25 mg/kg/day has a significant effect on 5-HT2AR binding (Fig. 5) on a collection of frontal cerebral voxels, encompassing parts of the left orbitofrontal, piriform, insular and olfactory cortex, the right piriform and olfactory cortex as well as the left ventral tegmental area (VTA).
Strengths of the in-vivo imaging approach and design of the study
This study described a thorough evaluation of the impact of 5-HT2AR antagonism on multiple aspects of the efficacy and side effect profile of haloperidol. It presents a certain number of strengths regarding its design, the variety of outcome measures and the methods to evaluate these outcome measures. The major strength of the present study is, to our view, the carefully chosen doses of haloperidol for the chronic treatment that were both representative of what has been employed in the literature and clinically relevant. Indeed, we employed doses ranging from relatively low (0.1 mg/kg/day) to particularly high (1 mg/kg/day). The 0.1 mg/kg/day dose is particularly interesting as it produces an occupancy of around 45–60% of the D2/3 receptors in the striatum, i.e. subtherapeutic or at the lowest end of the occupancy window that is considered optimal1,7. This occupancy was confirmed both ex vivo and in vivο. The 1 mg/kg/day dose was included in this study to allow a direct comparison with the majority of previous studies in the field. As discussed in the subsequent sections of this paper, the use of a 1 mg/kg/day dose of haloperidol in the literature (which has been criticized as unreasonably high7) may “conceal” any ameliorative effect of co-administered agents, such as the MDL-100,907. On the contrary, the use of a 0.5 mg/kg/day dose almost saturates striatal D2/3R (Fig. 2), induces clinically relevant side effects (e.g. catalepsy and VCM) and allows to demonstrate potential ameliorative effects of MDL-100,907, that were previously unappreciated in the literature.
A chronic treatment scheme with the D2/3R and 5-HT2AR antagonists was chosen. This is probably more clinically relevant for the evaluation of the effects of these antagonists firstly because antipsychotic agents are almost always employed chronically in patients. Secondly, the administration of these antagonists using osmotic minipumps and not via daily injections induces a stable occupancy of the receptors over time31, resembling the temporal pattern of occupancy in patients.
5-HT2AR antagonism partially alleviates haloperidol-induced catalepsy but has no effect on VCM
The present study confirms and extends the existing literature on the effect of a 5-HT2AR antagonism on the behavioral and neurochemical alterations induced by a D2/3R-specific antagonist. An interesting finding of our study concerns the effect of MDL-100,907 on haloperidol-induced catalepsy. As expected, a high occupancy of the striatal D2/3R induces this acute extrapyramidal symptom. Rats treated with the two higher haloperidol doses (0.5 and 1 mg/kg/day) showed a striatal occupancy >80% and presented a strong catalepsy, which confirms current literature8,9,10,11,12. In accordance with this literature, 5-HT2AR antagonism failed to counteract the cataleptic effect of the highest dose of haloperidol (1 mg/kg/day). Interestingly, 5-HT2AR antagonism managed to significantly reduce the cataleptic effect of the 0.5 mg/kg/day dose of haloperidol, a finding that, to our knowledge, has never been reported before. Indeed, previous studies which evaluated the effect of MDL-100,907 on chronic haloperidol-induced catalepsy only employed high doses of haloperidol (1 mg/kg/day or higher)8,10. Regarding acute treatment regimes, Creed-Carson et al.10 employed a single subcutaneous 0.5 mg/kg dose of haloperidol. The resulting catalepsy was not reversed by a 0.5 mg/kg dose of MDL-100,907 (the exact same dose as in the present study). Similar results were observed with an acute administration of 0.63 mg/kg of haloperidol32 and MDL-100,907 at 0.1 mg/kg. However, this apparent discrepancy might be explained by the differential effects of an acutely vs. chronically administered dose of haloperidol and by the lower dose of MDL-100,907 employed in the latter study. Indeed, it is probable that the duration of treatment with an antagonist has an impact on the relationship between its dose and the resulting catalepsy: an acute dose of haloperidol at 0.25 mg/kg induces catalepsy, while the same dose administered chronically does not33. In addition, in studies comparing a continuous vs. once daily administration of haloperidol via subcutaneous injections, it was demonstrated that the same dose of haloperidol, when administered once daily, produces steep peaks in occupancy that are considerably higher than the occupancy that is achieved with a continuous treatment via osmotic minipumps23,31. Regarding other possible pharmacological targets against antipsychotic-induced catalepsy, the 5-HT2C receptor could be another candidate receptor that could be related to atypicality. Indeed, 5-HT2C antagonism is a common characteristic of atypical antipsychotic agents34,35. A chronically administered dose of haloperidol at 1 mg/kg/day produces a catalepsy that may be reversed by a 5-HT2C antagonism9,10,35 and 5-HT2C antagonism may also reverse raclopride (a highly selective D2/3 antagonist)-induced catalepsy36,37. In the Creed-Carson study described above, 5-HT2CR antagonism was even superior to 5-HT2AR antagonism in reversing catalepsy induced by a single 0.5 mg/kg dose of haloperidol10. In a recent meta-regression study, 5-HT2CR affinity of antipsychotic agents was inversely associated to the risk of EPS in clinical studies34. In light of these findings, a synergistic modulation of the nigrostriatal system by both 5-HT2AR and 5-HT2CR may be hypothesized38. A 5-HT2AR antagonism may only be effective to prevent catalepsy within a limited range of D2/3R blockade39,40. Overall, these results suggest that a 5-HT2AR antagonism could—at least partially—mediate the clinically observed lower prevalence of acute extrapyramidal symptoms with atypical antipsychotic agents3.
The second aspect of motor side effects evaluated in this study was haloperidol-induced VCM. In accordance with the literature11,22,23, our results demonstrate that a high occupancy of the striatal D2/3R (induced by haloperidol doses of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg/day) is associated with an induction of VCM. A 5-HT2AR antagonism failed to alleviate this side effect of haloperidol (both at 0.5 and 1 mg/kg/day). This finding is also in accordance with and extends the existing literature that, so far, has only evaluated the effect of 5-HT2AR antagonism on the VCM induced by the highest dose of haloperidol (1 mg/kg/day). Here, we extend this finding for a lower, but still supratherapeutic, dose of haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg/day). Interestingly, the effect of 5-HT2AR antagonism not only lacked any preventive effect on the VCM but was even associated with a tendency to increase haloperidol-induced VCM (Fig. 3d, not reaching significance). Consequently, 5-HT2AR antagonism is probably not implicated in the clinically and experimentally observed lower prevalence of VCM in animals treated with atypical vs. typical antipsychotics41,42,43,44,45,46 and other mechanisms might mediate this phenomenon. In this respect, 5-HT2CR antagonism, which is a common feature of many atypical antipsychotics, has been proposed to play a role in the reduction of VCM in chronic haloperidol-treated rodents. One study in particular directly compared the effects of a selective 5-HT2C and 5-HT2AR antagonism in reversing haloperidol-induced VCM and found a superior efficacy of the former treatment10. Moreover, another study suggested a mechanistic link between this receptor and VCM47. 5-HT2CR might thus be a more valid target of research for the prevention of antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia. Finally, 5-HT2C antagonism, given its role in the regulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission, could be associated to properties of atypical antipsychotic drugs beyond motor side effects35,48,49.
5-HT2AR antagonism alters the dizocilpine-disruption of the PPI
In the present study, our hypothesis was that adding a chronic antagonism at the 5-HT2AR to a chronic haloperidol treatment would allow to reverse the PPI-disruptive effect of dizocilpine. In this test, atypical antipsychotics have been found effective50,51,52,53,54,55, while a haloperidol-only treatment has consistently been found ineffective51,56 (with only one study, to our knowledge, showing efficacy of a 14-day haloperidol treatment at 1 mg/kg/day in mice54). Given that a 5-HT2AR antagonism alone has given positive results in one study18, one might consider that a chronic MDL-100,907 treatment could render the haloperidol treatment capable of reversing the effect of dizocilpine and thus provide evidence that a 5-HT2AR antagonism could be the substrate of the superiority of atypical agents over typical ones in this experimental paradigm. Our results showed a positive effect of MDL-100,907 on PPI, likely dependent on the concurrently administered dose of haloperidol. The absence of significant results in the post hoc tests may be explained by a lack of the necessary statistical power to clearly demonstrate significant differences in group-wise comparisons. Overall, the results of the PPI experiments provide further argument in favor of the efficacy of a 5-HT2AR antagonism in the reversal of dizocilpine-disruption of the PPI but further research is needed to confirm this result.
5-HT2AR antagonism fails to reverse the haloperidol-induced D2/3 upregulation
At a neurochemical level, chronic D2/3R antagonism by haloperidol led to a significant increase in the D2/3R binding in the CP and the NAc, an effect observed over the whole range of haloperidol doses. This is in accordance with the literature, in which a chronic D2/3R antagonism has been shown to upregulate striatal D2/3R22,23,57,58,59,60,61. The literature also suggests that this D2/3 upregulation is present to a lesser extent, if at all, with atypical antipsychotics, notably clozapine57,62,63,64. Given the affinity for the 5-HT2AR of the majority of atypical agents that were evaluated in these studies, it was proposed that a 5-HT2AR antagonism could prevent this D2/3R upregulation. To our knowledge, no study so far has assessed the effect of a 5-HT2AR antagonism on this phenomenon to directly test this hypothesis. In the present study, the co-administration of MDL-100,907 with any of the doses of haloperidol failed to significantly prevent haloperidol-induced D2/3R upregulation, suggesting that 5-HT2AR antagonism may not be implicated in the lack of D2/3R upregulation with atypical antipsychotics and other receptors could account for this phenomenon22,23,57,58,59,60,61.
It is also hypothesized that haloperidol-induced D2/3R upregulation is implicated in the occurrence of VCM22. The results obtained here suggest that D2/3R upregulation is probably not a sufficient condition for the induction of VCM, as the animals treated with the 0.1 and the 0.25 mg/kg/day doses presented a D2/3R upregulation without VCM. These results challenge the hypothesized causal link between D2/3R upregulation and VCM induction and emphasize the need to conduct in-depth studies of these two phenomena.
Haloperidol at moderate doses upregulates the 5-HT2AR in frontal cortical areas and the VTA
A surprising finding of the present study was the increase in 5-HT2AR binding in frontal cortical areas and in the VTA, induced by a moderate dose of haloperidol (0.25 mg/kg/day). This effect was unaltered by 5-HT2AR antagonism. In fact, chronic 5-HT2AR antagonism was not associated with any change in either D2/3R or 5-HT2AR availabilities. This is a previously unappreciated finding, given that the literature so far has not assessed the effect of such a moderate dose of haloperidol on 5-HT2AR binding. Charron et al.65 showed that haloperidol, at 0.5 mg/kg/day decreases [3H]ketanserin binding in the frontal cortex and increases it in the striatum. However, this radiotracer also binds to 5-HT2CR, rendering the interpretation of these findings difficult. The downregulation of 5-HT2AR66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74, shared by atypical but not typical agents, was hypothesized as one of the substrates of atypicality, but no conclusive evidence linking it to the efficacy and side effect profile of atypical agents has been reported so far. The present study, given the absence of any 5-HT2AR antagonist properties of haloperidol, points to an indirect modulation of 5-HT2AR binding. One explanation for this could involve an alteration of serotonin release. If serotonin release is diminished, this transmitter would compete less with the [125I]R91150 radiotracer for binding to the 5-HT2AR, leading to an increase in radiotracer binding. Indeed, there is evidence that the dopaminergic system, via the D2 receptor, may alter serotonin transmission75,76,77,78,79,80. Previous studies showed that haloperidol treatment leads to a reduction in the concentration of a serotonin metabolite81 and serotonin itself in the brain82. Another possible hypothesis would be to attribute this haloperidol-induced change of 5-HT2AR binding to alterations in D2/5-HT2A heteromers. Albizu et al.83 found that heteromers of D2R and 5-HT2AR produce allosteric modulations of the latter receptor via D2-mediated mechanisms and alter its affinity for 5-HT2AR-binding radioligands. Finally, to explain the differential effect of moderate vs. high doses of haloperidol on 5-HT2AR binding, one could hypothesize that low doses of haloperidol may preferentially act on D2 autoreceptors, while higher doses act both on auto- and hetero-receptors84.
Regarding the possible functional implications of this finding, previous data has highlighted a differential interaction between 5-HT2AR-mediated and D2/3R-mediated effects depending on the level of D2/3R occupancy. Indeed, Liegeois et al.40 and Bonaccorso et al.48 showed that in vivo 5-HT2AR blockade with MDL-100,907 potentiated the dopamine-releasing effect of haloperidol in the rat medial prefrontal cortex, but only when haloperidol was administered at a dose lower or equal to 0.1 mg/kg. This could possibly be explained by our finding that a similar dose of haloperidol alters 5-HT2AR binding in rat frontal cortical areas. From a functional perspective, this could provide a mechanism through which a relatively low D2/3R occupancy combined with a 5-HT2AR occupancy mediates the effect of atypical antipsychotics by relatively preserving dopaminergic transmission in the frontal cortex while potently blocking it in the mesolimbic system5. The marked expression of 5-HT2AR in prefrontal cortical neurons that project to the NAc and the VTA suggests that the haloperidol-induced 5-HT2AR upregulation might be relevant for the regulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission by antipsychotic medications85,86. Interestingly, in the present study, the dose of 0.25 mg/kg/day of haloperidol, is the dose at which the impact of 5-HT2AR antagonism shows the highest tendency towards a reversal of dizocilpine-disruption of PPI. 5-HT2AR upregulation could be one of the mechanisms through which 5-HT2AR antagonism at this particular dose of haloperidol (0.25 mg/kg/day) may potentiate its efficacy on PPI. 5-HT2AR is also implicated in cognitive processes that may be deficient in patients suffering from schizophrenia and/or who are treated with antipsychotic medication. This could be relevant to the haloperidol-induced 5-HT2AR upregulation87. Nevertheless, further experiments, e.g. a cell-specific manipulation of 5-HT2AR signaling, are needed to directly interrogate the molecular underpinnings of the D2/3R-occupancy-dependent 5-HT2AR alteration in 5-HT2AR binding and assess its functional implications in terms of possible behavioral effects.
Limitations of the present study
The use of a Mdr1a knock-out strain may be considered a limitation. We used this strain to be able to use [125I]R91150 for the in-vivo imaging of 5-HT2AR14,88,89. The use of Mdr1a knock-out rats probably does not bias the behavioral and neurochemical responses to the chronic treatment with haloperidol and MDL-100,907, given that: (1) Mdr1a knock-out and wild-type rats present identical D2/3R and 5-HT2AR binding in the brain, as confirmed by ex-vivo autoradiography which is possible with [125I]R91150 given the highest sensitivity of the autoradiography when compared to in-vivo SPECT, even in wild-type rats14,89, (2) the dose-occupancy curve of haloperidol measured here in Mdr1a knock-out is similar to that previously reported in wild-type rats12,90, (3) the behavioral responses to haloperidol and dizocilpine were highly comparable to those observed in previous studies, notably the correspondence of the D2/3R occupancy by haloperidol and the induction of side effects8,9,10,11,12,22.
In conclusion, we provide evidence for the involvement of 5-HT2AR antagonism in the alleviation of catalepsy induced by haloperidol, an effect that is dose-dependent. Similarly, evidence is provided for an involvement of 5-HT2AR antagonism on the reversal of dizocilpine-disruption of PPI. 5-HT2AR antagonism failed to prevent the upregulation of D2/3R that is induced by chronic haloperidol treatment, as well as the induction of VCM by high doses of this typical antipsychotic agent. A previously unappreciated dose-dependent effect of moderate doses of haloperidol on the in-vivo frontal cortical 5-HT2AR binding has also been observed. The present work points to an involvement of a 5-HT2AR antagonism in the modification of some aspects of the efficacy and side effect profile of haloperidol, suggesting that, at least partially, 5-HT2AR antagonism might be associated with atypicality. Based on the results of this study however, the role of the 5-HT2AR antagonism as the sole (or even the major) determinant of antipsychotic atypicality can probably be rejected. The need to carefully choose clinically relevant antipsychotic doses (i.e. a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day and not 1 mg/kg/day) and to further investigate the role of neurochemical changes induced by chronic antipsychotic treatment in the search for causal relationships with its clinical effect is warranted.
Ginovart, N. & Kapur, S. Role of dopamine D(2) receptors for antipsychotic activity. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 212, 27–52 (2012).
Kapur, S. & Remington, G. Dopamine D(2) receptors and their role in atypical antipsychotic action: still necessary and may even be sufficient. Biol. Psychiatry 50, 873–883 (2001).
Martino, D., Karnik, V., Osland, S., Barnes, T. R. E. & Pringsheim, T. M. Movement disorders associated with antipsychotic medication in people with schizophrenia: an overview of cochrane reviews and meta-analysis. Can. J. Psychiatry Rev. Can. Psychiatr. 63, 706743718777392 (2018).
Leucht, S. et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet 382, 951–962 (2013).
Meltzer, H. Y. What’s atypical about atypical antipsychotic drugs? Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 4, 53–57 (2004).
Ebdrup, B. H., Rasmussen, H., Arnt, J. & Glenthoj, B. Serotonin 2A receptor antagonists for treatment of schizophrenia. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 20, 1211–1223 (2011).
Kapur, S., Wadenberg, M. L. & Remington, G. Are animal studies of antipsychotics appropriately dosed? Lessons from the bedside to the bench. Can. J. Psychiatry Rev. Can. Psychiatr. 45, 241–246 (2000).
McOmish, C. E., Lira, A., Hanks, J. B. & Gingrich, J. A. Clozapine-induced locomotor suppression is mediated by 5-HT2A receptors in the forebrain. Neuropsychopharmacology 37, 2747–2755 (2012).
Reavill, C., Kettle, A., Holland, V., Riley, G. & Blackburn, T. P. Attenuation of haloperidol-induced catalepsy by a 5-HT2C receptor antagonist. Br. J. Pharmacol. 126, 572–574 (1999).
Creed-Carson, M., Oraha, A. & Nobrega, J. N. Effects of 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonists on acute and chronic dyskinetic effects induced by haloperidol in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 219, 273–279 (2011).
Karl, T., Duffy, L., O’Brien, E., Matsumoto, I. & Dedova, I. Behavioural effects of chronic haloperidol and risperidone treatment in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 171, 286–294 (2006).
Wadenberg, M. L., Soliman, A., VanderSpek, S. C. & Kapur, S. Dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy is a common mechanism underlying animal models of antipsychotics and their clinical effects. Neuropsychopharmacology 25, 633–641 (2001).
Tsartsalis, S. et al. Dual-radiotracer translational SPECT neuroimaging. Comparison of three methods for the simultaneous brain imaging of D2/3 and 5-HT2A receptors. Neuroimage 176, 528–540 (2018).
Dumas, N. et al. In vivo quantification of 5-HT2A brain receptors in Mdr1a KO rats with 123I-R91150 single-photon emission computed tomography. Mol. Imaging 14, https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2015.00006 (2015).
Tsartsalis, S. et al. A single-scan protocol for absolute D2/3 receptor quantification with [123I]IBZM SPECT. NeuroImage 147, 461–472 (2017).
Swerdlow, N. R., Weber, M., Qu, Y., Light, G. A. & Braff, D. L. Realistic expectations of prepulse inhibition in translational models for schizophrenia research. Psychopharmacology 199, 331–388 (2008).
Wadenberg, M. G., Sills, T. L., Fletcher, P. J. & Kapur, S. Antipsychoticlike effects of amoxapine, without catalepsy, using the prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex test in rats. Biol. Psychiatry 47, 670–676 (2000).
Varty, G. B., Bakshi, V. P. & Geyer, M. A. M100907, a serotonin 5-HT2A receptor antagonist and putative antipsychotic, blocks dizocilpine-induced prepulse inhibition deficits in Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 20, 311–321 (1999).
Tournier, B. B. & Ginovart, N. Repeated but not acute treatment with (9)-tetrahydrocannabinol disrupts prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle: reversal by the dopamine D(2)/(3) receptor antagonist haloperidol. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 24, 1415–1423 (2014).
Martinez, Z. A., Oostwegel, J., Geyer, M. A., Ellison, G. D. & Swerdlow, N. R. “Early” and “late” effects of sustained haloperidol on apomorphine- and phencyclidine-induced sensorimotor gating deficits. Neuropsychopharmacology 23, 517–527 (2000).
Gobira, P. H., Ropke, J., Aguiar, D. C., Crippa, J. A. & Moreira, F. A. Animal models for predicting the efficacy and side effects of antipsychotic drugs. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. 35, S132–S139 (2013).
Turrone, P., Remington, G., Kapur, S. & Nobrega, J. N. The relationship between dopamine D2 receptor occupancy and the vacuous chewing movement syndrome in rats. Psychopharmacology 165, 166–171 (2003).
Turrone, P., Remington, G., Kapur, S. & Nobrega, J. N. Differential effects of within-day continuous vs. transient dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in the development of vacuous chewing movements (VCMs) in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, 1433–1439 (2003).
Glenthoj, B. Persistent vacuous chewing in rats following neuroleptic treatment: relationship to dopaminergic and cholinergic function. Psychopharmacology 113, 157–166 (1993).
Crowley, J. J. et al. Antipsychotic-induced vacuous chewing movements and extrapyramidal side effects are highly heritable in mice. Pharmacogenom. J. 12, 147–155 (2012).
Schiffer, W. K. et al. Serial microPET measures of the metabolic reaction to a microdialysis probe implant. J. Neurosci. Methods 155, 272–284 (2006).
Altman, D. G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research (Chapman and Hall, 2020).
Vallez Garcia, D. et al. A standardized method for the construction of tracer specific PET and SPECT rat brain templates: validation and implementation of a toolbox. PLoS ONE 10, e0122363 (2015).
Bennett, C. M., Wolford, G. L. & Miller, M. B. The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 4, 417–422 (2009).
Tsartsalis, S. et al. Dynamic image denoising for voxel-wise quantification with Statistical Parametric Mapping in molecular neuroimaging. PLoS ONE 13, e0203589 (2018).
Ginovart, N., Wilson, A. A., Hussey, D., Houle, S. & Kapur, S. D2-receptor upregulation is dependent upon temporal course of D2-occupancy: a longitudinal [11C]-raclopride PET study in cats. Neuropsychopharmacology 34, 662–671 (2008).
Mombereau, C., Arnt, J. & Mork, A. Involvement of presynaptic 5-HT1A receptors in the low propensity of brexpiprazole to induce extrapyramidal side effects in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 153, 141–146 (2017).
Osborne, P. G., O’Connor, W. T., Beck, O. & Ungerstedt, U. Acute versus chronic haloperidol: relationship between tolerance to catalepsy and striatal and accumbens dopamine, GABA and acetylcholine release. Brain Res. 634, 20–30 (1994).
Olten, B. & Bloch, M. H. Meta regression: Relationship between antipsychotic receptor binding profiles and side-effects. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 84, 272–281 (2018).
Di Giovanni, G. & De Deurwaerdere, P. New therapeutic opportunities for 5-HT2C receptor ligands in neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol. Ther. 157, 125–162 (2016).
Wadenberg, M. L. & Ahlenius, S. Antagonism by the 5-HT2A/C receptor agonist DOI of raclopride-induced catalepsy in the rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 294, 247–251 (1995).
Wadenberg, M. G., Browning, J. L., Young, K. A. & Hicks, P. B. Antagonism at 5-HT(2A) receptors potentiates the effect of haloperidol in a conditioned avoidance response task in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 68, 363–370 (2001).
Egerton, A., Ahmad, R., Hirani, E. & Grasby, P. M. Modulation of striatal dopamine release by 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor antagonists: [11C]raclopride PET studies in the rat. Psychopharmacology 200, 487–496 (2008).
Lucas, G., De Deurwaerdere, P., Caccia, S. & Umberto, S. The effect of serotonergic agents on haloperidol-induced striatal dopamine release in vivo: opposite role of 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptor subtypes and significance of the haloperidol dose used. Neuropharmacology 39, 1053–1063 (2000).
Liegeois, J. F., Ichikawa, J. & Meltzer, H. Y. 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism potentiates haloperidol-induced dopamine release in rat medial prefrontal cortex and inhibits that in the nucleus accumbens in a dose-dependent manner. Brain Res. 947, 157–165 (2002).
Carbon, M., Kane, J. M., Leucht, S. & Correll, C. U. Tardive dyskinesia risk with first- and second-generation antipsychotics in comparative randomized controlled trials: a meta-analysis. World Psychiatry 17, 330–340 (2018).
Marchese, G. et al. Haloperidol versus risperidone on rat “early onset” vacuous chewing. Behav. Brain Res. 149, 9–16 (2004).
Ikeda, H. et al. Effects of chronic haloperidol and clozapine on vacuous chewing and dopamine-mediated jaw movements in rats: evaluation of a revised animal model of tardive dyskinesia. J. Neural Transm. 106, 1205–1216 (1999).
Egan, M. F., Hyde, T. M., Kleinman, J. E. & Wyatt, R. J. Neuroleptic-induced vacuous chewing movements in rodents: incidence and effects of long-term increases in haloperidol dose. Psychopharmacology 117, 74–81 (1995).
Naidu, P. S. & Kulkarni, S. K. Effect of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A/2C receptor modulation on neuroleptic-induced vacuous chewing movements. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 428, 81–86 (2001).
Rosengarten, H. & Quartermain, D. The effect of chronic treatment with typical and atypical antipsychotics on working memory and jaw movements in three- and eighteen-month-old rats. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 26, 1047–1054 (2002).
Wolf, W. A., Bieganski, G. J., Guillen, V. & Mignon, L. Enhanced 5-HT2C receptor signaling is associated with haloperidol-induced “early onset” vacuous chewing in rats: implications for antipsychotic drug therapy. Psychopharmacology 182, 84–94 (2005).
Bonaccorso, S. et al. SR46349-B, a 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor antagonist, potentiates haloperidol-induced dopamine release in rat medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens. Neuropsychopharmacology 27, 430–441 (2002).
Di Matteo, V., Cacchio, M., Di Giulio, C. & Esposito, E. Role of serotonin(2C) receptors in the control of brain dopaminergic function. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 71, 727–734 (2002).
Bubenikova, V., Votava, M., Horacek, J., Palenicek, T. & Dockery, C. The effect of zotepine, risperidone, clozapine and olanzapine on MK-801-disrupted sensorimotor gating. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 80, 591–596 (2005).
Varty, G. B. & Higgins, G. A. Examination of drug-induced and isolation-induced disruptions of prepulse inhibition as models to screen antipsychotic drugs. Psychopharmacology 122, 15–26 (1995).
Zangrando, J. et al. Atypical antipsychotic olanzapine reversed deficit on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex produced by microinjection of dizocilpine (MK-801) into the inferior colliculus in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 257, 77–82 (2013).
Hudson, M. R., Rind, G., O’Brien, T. J. & Jones, N. C. Reversal of evoked gamma oscillation deficits is predictive of antipsychotic activity with a unique profile for clozapine. Transl. Psychiatry 6, e784 (2016).
Li, C. et al. Sub-chronic antipsychotic drug administration reverses the expression of neuregulin 1 and ErbB4 in a cultured MK801-induced mouse primary hippocampal neuron or a neurodevelopmental schizophrenia model. Neurochem. Res. 41, 2049–2064 (2016).
Fijal, K., Popik, P. & Nikiforuk, A. Co-administration of 5-HT6 receptor antagonists with clozapine, risperidone, and a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist: effects on prepulse inhibition in rats. Psychopharmacology 231, 269–281 (2014).
Feifel, D. & Priebe, K. The effects of subchronic haloperidol on intact and dizocilpine-disrupted sensorimotor gating. Psychopharmacology 146, 175–179 (1999).
Kusumi, I., Takahashi, Y., Suzuki, K., Kameda, K. & Koyama, T. Differential effects of subchronic treatments with atypical antipsychotic drugs on dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptors in the rat brain. J. Neural Transm. 107, 295–302 (2000).
Ishikane, T., Kusumi, I., Matsubara, R., Matsubara, S. & Koyama, T. Effects of serotonergic agents on the up-regulation of dopamine D2 receptors induced by haloperidol in rat striatum. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 321, 163–169 (1997).
Varela, F. A. et al. Repeated aripiprazole treatment causes dopamine D2 receptor up-regulation and dopamine supersensitivity in young rats. J. Psychopharmacol. 28, 376–386 (2014).
Inoue, A. et al. Aripiprazole, a novel antipsychotic drug, inhibits quinpirole-evoked GTPase activity but does not up-regulate dopamine D2 receptor following repeated treatment in the rat striatum. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 321, 105–111 (1997).
Mahmoudi, S., Levesque, D. & Blanchet, P. J. Upregulation of dopamine D3, not D2, receptors correlates with tardive dyskinesia in a primate model. Mov. Disord. 29, 1125–1133 (2014).
Tarazi, F. I., Yeghiayan, S. K., Baldessarini, R. J., Kula, N. S. & Neumeyer, J. L. Long-term effects of S(+)N-n-propylnorapomorphine compared with typical and atypical antipsychotics: differential increases of cerebrocortical D2-like and striatolimbic D4-like dopamine receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology 17, 186–196 (1997).
Tarazi, F. I., Florijn, W. J. & Creese, I. Differential regulation of dopamine receptors after chronic typical and atypical antipsychotic drug treatment. Neuroscience 78, 985–996 (1997).
Lidow, M. S. & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. A common action of clozapine, haloperidol, and remoxipride on D1- and D2-dopaminergic receptors in the primate cerebral cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 4353–4356 (1994).
Charron, A., Hage, C. E., Servonnet, A. & Samaha, A.-N. 5-HT2 receptors modulate the expression of antipsychotic-induced dopamine supersensitivity. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 25, 2381–2393 (2015).
Amato, D., Natesan, S., Yavich, L., Kapur, S. & Muller, C. P. Dynamic regulation of dopamine and serotonin responses to salient stimuli during chronic haloperidol treatment. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 14, 1327–1339 (2011).
Yadav, P. N., Kroeze, W. K., Farrell, M. S. & Roth, B. L. Antagonist functional selectivity: 5-HT2A serotonin receptor antagonists differentially regulate 5-HT2A receptor protein level in vivo. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 339, 99–105 (2011).
Lian, J., Huang, X.-F., Pai, N. & Deng, C. Effects of olanzapine and betahistine co-treatment on serotonin transporter, 5-HT2A and dopamine D2 receptor binding density. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 47, 62–68 (2013).
Moreno, J. L. et al. Persistent effects of chronic clozapine on the cellular and behavioral responses to LSD in mice. Psychopharmacology 225, 217–226 (2013).
Tarazi, F. I., Zhang, K. & Baldessarini, R. J. Long-term effects of olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine on serotonin 1A, 2A and 2C receptors in rat forebrain regions. Psychopharmacology 161, 263–270 (2002).
Steward, L. J., Kennedy, M. D., Morris, B. J. & Pratt, J. A. The atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine enhances chronic PCP-induced regulation of prefrontal cortex 5-HT2A receptors. Neuropharmacology 47, 527–537 (2004).
Choi, Y. K., Adham, N., Kiss, B., Gyertyan, I. & Tarazi, F. I. Long-term effects of aripiprazole exposure on monoaminergic and glutamatergic receptor subtypes: comparison with cariprazine. CNS Spectr. 22, 1–11 (2017).
Kurita, M. et al. HDAC2 regulates atypical antipsychotic responses through the modulation of mGlu2 promoter activity. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1245–1254 (2012).
Huang, X.-F., Tan, Y. Y., Huang, X. & Wang, Q. Effect of chronic treatment with clozapine and haloperidol on 5-HT2A and 2C receptor mRNA expression in the rat brain. Neurosci. Res. 59, 314–321 (2007).
Mendlin, A., Martin, F. J. & Jacobs, B. L. Involvement of dopamine D2 receptors in apomorphine-induced facilitation of forebrain serotonin output. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 351, 291–298 (1998).
Amargos-Bosch, M., Adell, A. & Artigas, F. Antipsychotic drugs reverse the AMPA receptor-stimulated release of 5-HT in the medial prefrontal cortex. J. Neurochem. 102, 550–561 (2007).
Amargos-Bosch, M., Lopez-Gil, X., Artigas, F. & Adell, A. Clozapine and olanzapine, but not haloperidol, suppress serotonin efflux in the medial prefrontal cortex elicited by phencyclidine and ketamine. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 9, 565–573 (2006).
Amargós-Bosch, M., Adell, A., Bortolozzi, A. & Artigas, F. Stimulation of α1-adrenoceptors in the rat medial prefrontal cortex increases the local in vivo 5-hydroxytryptamine release: reversal by antipsychotic drugs. J. Neurochem. 87, 831–842 (2004).
Amargos-Bosch, M., Adell, A., Bortolozzi, A. & Artigas, F. Stimulation of alpha1-adrenoceptors in the rat medial prefrontal cortex increases the local in vivo 5-hydroxytryptamine release: reversal by antipsychotic drugs. J. Neurochem. 87, 831–842 (2003).
Maejima, T., Masseck, O. A., Mark, M. D. & Herlitze, S. Modulation of firing and synaptic transmission of serotonergic neurons by intrinsic G protein-coupled receptors and ion channels. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 7, 40 (2013).
Burnet, P. W., Chen, C. P., McGowan, S., Franklin, M. & Harrison, P. J. The effects of clozapine and haloperidol on serotonin-1A, -2A and -2C receptor gene expression and serotonin metabolism in the rat forebrain. Neuroscience 73, 531–540 (1996).
Bishnoi, M., Chopra, K. & Kulkarni, S. K. Neurochemical changes associated with chronic administration of typical antipsychotics and its relationship with tardive dyskinesia. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 29, 211–216 (2007).
Albizu, L., Holloway, T., Gonzalez-Maeso, J. & Sealfon, S. C. Functional crosstalk and heteromerization of serotonin 5-HT2A and dopamine D2 receptors. Neuropharmacology 61, 770–777 (2011).
Dias, F. R. C., de Matos, L. W., Sampaio, M. D. F. D. S., Carey, R. J. & Carrera, M. P. Opposite effects of low versus high dose haloperidol treatments on spontaneous and apomorphine induced motor behavior: evidence that at a very low dose haloperidol acts as an indirect dopamine agonist. Behav. Brain Res. 229, 153–159 (2012).
Mocci, G., Jiménez-Sánchez, L., Adell, A., Cortés, R. & Artigas, F. Expression of 5-HT2A receptors in prefrontal cortex pyramidal neurons projecting to nucleus accumbens. Potential relevance for atypical antipsychotic action. Neuropharmacology 79, 49–58 (2014).
Vazquez-Borsetti, P., Cortes, R. & Artigas, F. Pyramidal neurons in rat prefrontal cortex projecting to ventral tegmental area and dorsal raphe nucleus express 5-HT2A receptors. Cereb. Cortex 19, 1678–1686 (2008).
Williams, G. V., Rao, S. G. & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. The physiological role of 5-HT2A receptors in working memory. J. Neurosci. 22, 2843–2854 (2002).
Dumas, N. et al. Small-animal single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging of the brain serotoninergic systems in wild-type and mdr1a knockout rats. Mol. Imaging 13, https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2013.00072 (2014).
Tsartsalis, S. et al. 5-HT2A receptor SPECT imaging with [(1)(2)(3)I]R91150 under P-gp inhibition with tariquidar: more is better? Nucl. Med. Biol. 43, 81–88 (2016).
Natesan, S., Reckless, G. E., Nobrega, J. N., Fletcher, P. J. & Kapur, S. Dissociation between in vivo occupancy and functional antagonism of dopamine D2 receptors: comparing aripiprazole to other antipsychotics in animal models. Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 1854–1863 (2005).
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 310030_156829), the Geneva Neuroscience Centre, the Maria Zaousi Foundation (Greece), the “Swiss Association for Alzheimer’s Research” and the Vachoux Foundation (Switzerland). Authors are grateful to Mrs. Maria Surini-Demiri and Mr. Marouane Ben Ammar for excellent technical assistance.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Tsartsalis, S., Tournier, B.B., Gloria, Y. et al. Effect of 5-HT2A receptor antagonism on levels of D2/3 receptor occupancy and adverse behavioral side-effects induced by haloperidol: a SPECT imaging study in the rat. Transl Psychiatry 11, 51 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-01179-5