Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Prenatal stress causes intrauterine inflammation and serotonergic dysfunction, and long-term behavioral deficits through microbe- and CCL2-dependent mechanisms

Abstract

Prenatal stress (PNS) is associated with neuropsychiatric disorders in offspring, including anxiety, depression, and autism spectrum disorders. There is mounting evidence that these behavioral phenotypes have origins in utero. Maternal microbes, inflammation, and serotonergic dysfunction have been implicated as potential mediators of the behavioral consequences of PNS; whether and how these systems interact is unclear. Here, we examine the effects of PNS in utero using late-gestation maternal restraint stress in wild-type (WT), germ-free (GF), and CCL2/ genetic knock-out (KO) mice. In WT mice, PNS leads to placental and fetal brain inflammation, including an elevation in the chemokine CCL2. This inflammation is largely absent in GF mice, indicating the critical role of maternal microbes in mediating immune processes in utero. Furthermore, PNS in the absence of CCL2 failed to increase pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 in the fetal brain. PNS offspring also exhibited deficits in sociability and anxiety-like behavior that were absent in CCL2/− PNS offspring. Tryptophan and serotonin (5-HT) were elevated in the WT PNS placenta, but not in CCL2/− and GF animals. Altogether, these findings suggest that a complex interaction between maternal microbes, inflammation, and serotonin metabolism regulates the emergence of behavioral abnormalities following PNS.

Introduction

Prenatal stress (PNS) has been linked with adverse neuropsychiatric outcomes1,2. Children of women who experience psychosocial stress during pregnancy are at elevated risk of depression, anxiety, and autism spectrum disorders1,2,3. This phenomenon is supported by findings from rodent models, in which PNS leads to anxiety-like behavior, social deficits, and depressive-like behavior in the offspring4,5,6,7,8. However, the mechanisms underlying possible fetal programming during PNS are still being elucidated.

Perturbation of the maternal gut microbiome has been implicated as a mechanism through which PNS can influence neurodevelopment9,10,11. There is mounting evidence that commensal microbiota intimately interact with and shape both the developing immune system and the brain12,13. Toll-like receptors (TLR) present on immune cells and trophoblast cells of the placenta14,15 allow for microbes or microbial components to signal across fetal tissue, initiating an inflammatory cascade and resulting in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines15,16,17. These interactions are necessary for the maturation of the immune system, as germ-free (GF) mice have diminished hematopoietic capacity and blunted cytokine production18,19. While PNS has been shown to upregulate expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the placenta and fetal brain5,6,20, the interplay between maternal microbes and inflammation in mediating the programming effects of PNS is unclear.

C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) is a chemokine that primarily functions in the recruitment of leukocytes to propagate an inflammatory response21 and recruits monocytes to the brain to elicit an anxiogenic response during stress22,23. CCL2 is also highly expressed in uterine and placental tissue24,25,26; whether CCL2 plays a role in fetal neurobiological and behavioral programming is unknown. Therefore, the contribution of placental and fetal brain CCL2 to neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes is an important area for investigation, especially in the context of PNS.

The potential for inflammatory signals to alter neurodevelopment is well documented, and can occur directly through the damaging effects of cytokine signaling27, or indirectly through various mechanisms. These include alterations to the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, disruptions of offspring gut microbial colonization, or changes to offspring neuroimmune function (as Reviewed in ref. 28). Another possible mechanism is by modulating serotonergic synthesis, transport, and breakdown29,30. We have previously shown that exposure to restraint stress during pregnancy results in elevated plasma levels of serotonin (5-HT) in male offspring concurrent with sociability deficits and cortical inflammation4. Dysfunction of the immune and serotonergic systems is also observed in patients with autism spectrum disorders31,32. There is evidence to suggest that a dysfunctional serotonergic phenotype has intrauterine origins, as the placenta is the primary source of 5-HT for the fetal brain prior to the development of serotonergic neurons between embryonic days 12–1433,34. Directly stimulating a maternal immune response during pregnancy is sufficient to alter placental 5-HT synthesis35. Indirect perturbations, including PNS, can result in altered fetal serotonin synthesis as evidenced by elevated concentrations of 5-HT in the fetal brain36. Furthermore, administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which signals through TLR4 and initiates the production of inflammatory cytokines, enhances 5-HT breakdown in the adult brain29. Despite data supporting a link between inflammation and serotonergic dysfunction, the capacity for PNS to influence this system during intrauterine development is largely unknown.

We hypothesized that an inflammatory response elicited by PNS is dependent upon maternal microbes and CCL2 signaling, and leads to altered serotonergic metabolism in the placenta and fetal brain, culminating in adverse behavioral outcomes in adult offspring. Through the use of our chronic restraint stress model in pregnant C57BL/6, GF, and CCL2−/− mice, we demonstrate that PNS induces microbe-dependent intrauterine inflammation and placental serotonergic dysfunction, and that CCL2 is critical for mediating deficits in adult offspring behavior.

Methods

Animals and experimental design

Nulliparous 10-week old wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice and CCL2−/− (knock-out; KO) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) and GF C57BL/6 mice from Taconic Biosciences (Germantown, NY) and maintained in conventional or sterile conditions at the Ohio State University. Mice were bred for 48 h, and copulation plugs were used to determine the first gestational day (GD1) of pregnancy. Pregnant dams were randomly assigned to stressed (PNS) or non-stressed groups. As previously described4,5, the PNS group underwent restraint stress from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. on GD10–GD16 using a 50 mL conical tube with perforations to allow for ventilation, while the non-stressed group was left undisturbed. The timing of the restraint stress was chosen to coincide with key processes in neurodevelopment and the establishment of yolk sac placental circulation on E9–1037,38. In the first set of experiments, WT, CCL2−/−, and GF dams were euthanized on GD17 for tissue collection (Group 1). In a second set of experiments, WT and CCL2/− dams went through parturition and pups were weaned at PND 28, divided by sex, and co-housed with littermates, with a maximum of five mice per cage, until offspring behavioral testing was performed at 10 weeks of age by a person blinded to the experimental groups (Group 2; Fig. 1a). Four replicates using the same restraint stress paradigm were performed, with a total of 35 WT dams (16 control and 19 PNS), 34 CCL2/− dams (19 control and 15 PNS), and 11 GF dams (5 control and 6 PNS). Tissue was collected from, and behavior was performed, using a maximum of four offspring from each litter, balancing for sex. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the principles and procedures outlined in the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Ohio State University.

Fig. 1: Prenatal stress leads to alterations in the CCL2–CCR2 axis in the intrauterine environment.
figure1

a WT, CCL2−/−, and GF pregnant mice were exposed to restraint stress for 2 h daily from GD10 to GD16. Placental and fetal brain tissue were collected from Group 1 animals on GD17. In Group 2, dams underwent parturition, and behavior of the WT and CCL2−/− offspring was assessed at 10 weeks of age. CCL2 protein concentration in WT b placental (n = 14/7, 16/8 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) and c fetal brain (n = 16/5, 16/7 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) lysates. CCR2 gene expression in WT d placentas (n = 15/9, 15/8 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) and e fetal brains (n = 14/9, 17/8 samples/litters in control, stress conditions). Bars represent mean ± SEM. T test: *p < 0.05. WT = wild type; GF = germ free; GD = gestational day.

Tissue collection

Dams were euthanized at GD17 using CO2 and a sterile cesarean section was performed to remove the uterus. Placentas and fetal brain tissue were excised, frozen on dry ice, and stored at −80 °C until processing. Fetal microdissection and examination of the reproductive structures were used to determine fetal sex, which was confirmed using genotyping of fetal tails for the SRY gene.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used for RNA extraction and cDNA was synthesized using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), per manufacturer’s instructions. PCR reactions were performed using the Taqman Gene Expression Master Mix protocol (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR Systems machine (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Genes of interest are listed in Supplementary Table 1. qPCR data is presented as fold change compared with the non-stressed group, using the 2−ΔΔCt method. For comparing across WT, CCL2−/−, and GF tissue, data were normalized to the WT control group. For determining sex differences, data were compared with the female control group. SDHA and TBP were used as endogenous control genes for placental samples, and GAPDH was used for fetal brain samples.

ELISA

Placentas and fetal brains were homogenized in T-PER Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) by sonication. CCL2 was measured in the protein lysates using the Mouse CCL2/JE/MCP-1 Duoset ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

LC/MS

The Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility at the Ohio State University extracted metabolites from placental and fetal brain tissues and determined the concentration of tryptophan, serotonin, and 5-HIAA. Concentrations were normalized to tissue weights.

Social behavior testing

Sociability was assessed using the three-chamber social behavior test, as previously described4. Briefly, testing was completed in a three-chamber box with metal cages placed in the center of the two end chambers. A 10-min acclimation phase was followed by a 10-min test phase, during which a novel object (orange Pyrex cap (Corning, NY)) and a social stimulus DBA2J mouse of the same sex and age (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) were placed in the metal cages. The chamber that contained the conspecific mouse was randomly assigned for each test mouse to control for side preference. The trials were recorded using Noldus EthoVision software (Wageningen, The Netherlands). Social approach behavior was calculated by subtracting the time spent actively investigating the novel object from the time spent with the social stimulus mouse and dividing by the total time interacting with both cages.

Light–dark preference test

Light–dark preference testing was performed in a 40 × 40 × 25 cm Plexiglas box divided into equal 20 × 40 × 25 cm compartments by a black Plexiglass separator, with a 3 × 10 cm doorway allowing for the test mouse to transition between zones. The light compartment was illuminated at an intensity of 150 lux, while the dark compartment was enclosed by a black Plexiglass cover. The test mouse was placed into the light compartment to begin the 5 min trial, and time to enter the dark compartment, duration of time spent in each zone, and total distance traveled was measured using Fusion software (Omnitech Electronics, Inc., Columbus, OH).

Statistical analyses

Statistical tests were performed using Graphpad Prism. Multifactorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test was performed to determine possible effects of sex. For tests in which the main effect of sex and the interaction between sex and stress were not significant, data were collapsed and two-tailed unpaired t-tests were used to determine statistical significance between stressed and non-stressed groups, and unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction were performed for groups with statistically significantly different variances (F test). Differences between WT, CCL2−/−, and GF tissue were assessed using a two-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test. The ROUT method was used to identify outliers (with Q set to 1%), which were excluded from analyses. Sample sizes were chosen based on a power analysis using values from prior experiments5. Significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

PNS leads to changes in the CCL2–CCR2 axis in the intrauterine environment

PNS increased CCL2 protein levels in the placenta (Fig. 1b; t(24.36) = 2.15; p = 0.042) and in the fetal brain (Fig. 1c; t(19.22) = 2.40; p = 0.027). Expression of C-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 2 (CCR2), the primary receptor for CCL2, was not altered in placentas (Fig. 1d; t(28) = 1.49; p = 0.148), but was decreased in PNS fetal brains (Fig. 1e; t(17.09) = 2.49; p = 0.023). Together, this suggests that our model of PNS results in disruption of the CCL2–CCR2 axis in the intrauterine environment.

PNS increases fetal brain IL6 in a CCL2-dependent manner

To determine the role of CCL2 in the intrauterine environment following PNS, CCL2−/− placentas and fetal brains were examined and compared with WT. Absence of CCL2 in CCL2−/− tissues was confirmed by PCR. Exposure to PNS resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in CCR2 expression in the CCL2−/− placenta (Fig. 2a; t(24) = 2.02; p = 0.054), while there was no change in the fetal brain (Fig. 2b; t(27) = 0.53; p = 0.599). If maternal microbial homeostasis is disrupted by PNS, microbes or their products may reach the intrauterine environment, which can be monitored in part through the expression of pattern recognition receptors, such as TLR4. PNS increased TLR4 expression in the placenta (Fig. 2c; main effect of stress: f(1,54) = 6.97; p = 0.011) and decreased TLR4 in the fetal brain (Fig. 2d; main effect of stress: f(1,56) = 4.48; p = 0.039), though CCL2−/− placentas had lower expression (Fig. 2c; main effect of genotype: f(1,54) = 10.19; p = 0.002) and CCL2−/− fetal brains had higher expression (Fig. 2d; main effect of genotype: f(1,56) = 4.35; p = 0.042) compared with WT.

Fig. 2: Prenatal stress increases fetal brain IL6 in a CCL2-dependent manner.
figure2

CCR2 gene expression in CCL2−/− a placentas (n = 13/7, 13/5 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) and b fetal brains (n = 16/8, 13/5 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) following stress. Gene expression of the pattern recognition receptor TLR4 in the WT and CCL2−/− placenta (n = 15/8, 16/8, 14/8, 13/5 samples/litters in WT control, WT stress, CCL2−/− control, CCL2−/− stress conditions) (c) and fetal brain (n = 14/8, 18/8, 15/8, 13/5 samples/litters in WT control, WT stress, CCL2−/− control, CCL2−/− stress conditions) (d). Gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines e, f IL6 and g, h TNF in the WT and CCL2−/− placenta (IL6: n = 16/9, 14/8, 14/8, 13/5; TNF: n = 16/9, 16/8, 14/8, 13/5 samples/litters in WT control, WT stress, CCL2−/− control, CCL2−/ stress conditions) and fetal brain (IL6: n = 14/9, 15/7, 16/8, 12/5; TNF: n = 15/9, 14/8, 16/8, 13/5 samples/litters in WT control, WT stress, CCL2−/− control, CCL2−/− stress conditions), respectively. Bars represent mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA: asterisks (*) represent main effect of genotype (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01); daggers (†) represent main effect of stress (†p < 0.05); carets (^) represent stress × genotype interaction with the significant Tukey post hoc test (^p < 0.05; ^^p < 0.01).

Since TLR4 activation can enhance expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, a panel of cytokines and immune-related receptors was examined in the WT placenta and fetal brain (Supplementary Table 2). Among the genes of interest, the most compelling stress-induced immune dysregulation was evident in the intrauterine expression of IL6 and TNF following PNS. CCL2−/− placentas had decreased expression of IL6 compared with WT (Fig. 2e; main effect of genotype: f(1,53) = 6.18; p = 0.016), while there was a stress × genotype interaction in the fetal brain (Fig. 2f; f(1,53) = 8.50; p = 0.005), with stress increasing IL6 expression only in WT mice. These data indicate that PNS increases fetal brain IL6 expression in a CCL2-dependent manner. Notably, there was a sex difference in CCL2/− fetal brain IL6 expression, with males expressing lower levels compared with females (Supplementary Fig. 1a; main effect of sex: f(1,24) = 4.55; p = 0.043), and a stress-induced decrease in both sexes (main effect of stress: f(1,24) = 5.27; p = 0.031). Interestingly, PNS increased TNF expression in CCL2−/− placentas, but not WT (Fig. 2g; stress × genotype interaction: f(1,55) = 4.61; p = 0.036), and in both WT and CCL2−/− fetal brains (Fig. 2h; main effect of stress: f(1,54) = 5.29; p = 0.025).

Altogether, these data suggest that the placenta may be responding to a microbe-associated molecular pattern (possibly a TLR4 ligand) following PNS, leading to inflammation within the fetal brain due to CCL2 signaling.

In the absence of microbes, PNS does not induce intrauterine inflammation

In GF animals, PNS resulted in a nonsignificant increase in CCL2 protein in the placenta (Fig. 3a; t(14) = 1.87; p = 0.083), and no change in the fetal brain (Fig. 3b; t(17) = 0.80; p = 0.433). CCR2 gene expression in GF tissue was not altered by PNS (placenta: Fig. 3c; t(25) = 0.28; p = 0.778; fetal brains Fig. 3d; t(15.36) = 0.66; p = 0.522). Likewise, TLR4 gene expression in GF tissue remained unchanged (Fig. 3e; placenta: t(25) = 1.77; p = 0.089; fetal brain: t(24) = 0.19; p = 0.85). Finally, IL6 did not differ in GF tissues (Fig. 3f; placenta: t(23) = 0.26; p = 0.800; fetal brain: t(19.65 = 0.34; p = 0.741), while only GF placental TNF was altered by PNS (Fig. 3g; placenta: t(24) = 2.07; p = 0.049; fetal brain: t(14.56) = 1.10; p = 0.288). Together, this suggests that PNS fails to initiate an inflammatory cascade within the fetal brain when microbes are not present.

Fig. 3: In the absence of microbes, prenatal stress does not induce intrauterine inflammation.
figure3

CCL2 protein concentration in GF a placental (n = 9/5, 7/5 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) and b fetal brain lysates (n = 10/5, 9/5 samples/litters in control, stress conditions). CCR2 gene expression in the c placenta (n = 13/5, 14/6 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) and d fetal brain (n = 11/5, 12/6 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) following stress in GF dams. e TLR4 gene expression in the GF placenta and fetal brain (placenta: n = 13/5, 14/6; fetal brain: n = 12/5, 14/6 samples/litters in control, stress conditions). Gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines f IL6 (placenta: 12/5, 13/6; fetal brain: n = 11/5, 14/6 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) and g TNF (placenta: n = 12/5, 14/6; fetal brain: n = 12/5, 13/6 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) in the GF placenta and fetal brain. Dashed lines separate placental and fetal brain gene expression data, which were analyzed separately. Bars represent mean ± SEM. T test: *p < 0.05.

Intrauterine tryptophan and serotonin availability is partially dependent upon CCL2 and microbes

Given previous data from our lab indicating altered 5-HT concentrations following PNS exposure4, our aim was to determine if these alterations have intrauterine origins. The pathway through which 5-HT is synthesized and broken down is depicted in Fig. 4a. PNS increased levels of placental tryptophan and 5-HT in WT mice, but not CCL2−/− or GF mice (Fig. 4b, c; tryptophan: stress × genotype interaction: f(2,61) = 4.92; p = 0.011; 5-HT: stress × genotype interaction: f(2,59) = 3.48; p = 0.037). Tryptophan concentration control GF placentas were lower than both WT (adjusted p = 0.046) and CCL2−/− (adjusted p = 0.004), and there was a significant stress × sex interaction on GF placental tryptophan levels (Supplementary Fig. 1b; stress × sex interaction: f(1,16) = 10.69; p = 0.005) that was absent in WT or KO tissue. In contrast, there were main effects of stress and genotype on 5-HIAA concentrations (Fig. 4d; stress: f(1,59) = 5.70; p = 0.020; genotype: f(2,59) = 20.58; p < 0.0001), but no stress × genotype interaction.

Fig. 4: Placental tryptophan and serotonin availability is dependent upon CCL2 and microbes.
figure4

a Tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) metabolizes tryptophan to serotonin, which is then broken down into 5-HIAA by monoamine oxidase A (MAOA). b Concentration of tryptophan in WT (n = 12/7, 12/7 samples/litters in control, stress conditions), CCL2−/− (n = 13/7, 10/5 samples/litters in control, stress conditions), and GF (n = 10/5, 10/6 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) mice following exposure to restraint stress. c Concentration of 5-HT in WT (n = 11/6, 11/7 samples/litters in control, stress conditions), CCL2−/− (n = 13/7, 10/5 samples/litters in control, stress conditions), and GF (n = 10/5, 10/6 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) placentas. d Concentration of 5-HIAA in WT (n = 12/7, 12/7 samples/litters in control, stress conditions), CCL2−/− (n = 13/7, 11/5 samples/litters in control, stress conditions), and GF (n = 8/5, 9/6 samples/litters in control, stress conditions) placentas. Expression of e TPH1 (n = 16/9, 14/8, 11/7, 8/5, 13/5, 14/6 samples/litters in WT control, WT stress, CCL2−/− control, CCL2−/− stress, GF control, GF stress conditions) and f TPH2 (n = 14/9, 15/8, 10/4 12/5, 10/5, 9/6 samples/litters in WT control, WT stress, CCL2−/− control, CCL2−/− stress, GF control, GF stress conditions), two isoforms of TPH present in the placenta. g MAOA gene expression (n = 16/9, 16/8, 14/8, 13/5, 13/5, 14/6 samples/litters in WT control, WT stress, CCL2−/− control, CCL2−/− stress, GF control, GF stress conditions). Bars represent mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA: asterisks (*) represent main effect of genotype (**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001); daggers (†) represent main effect of stress (†p < 0.05); carets (^) represent stress × genotype interaction with the significant Tukey post hoc test (^p < 0.05; ^^p < 0.01).

In order to determine whether PNS alters 5-HT synthesis and breakdown, gene expression of the enzymes involved in synthesizing and metabolizing 5-HT were investigated. Since the placenta has been shown to express two isoforms of TPH (TPH1 and TPH2)39, both were examined. There was a main effect of genotype (but not PNS) on placental TPH1 expression (Fig. 4e; f(2,70) = 5.93; p = 0.004), with considerably lower expression in the CCL2−/− placenta compared with WT and GF. There was also a main effect of genotype on placental TPH2 expression (Fig. 4f; f(2,64) = 9.09; p = 0.003), with the highest expression now in CCL2−/− compared with WT and GF tissue. There was also a main effect of genotype on placental MAOA expression (Fig. 4e; f(2,80) = 16.27; p < 0.0001), with decreased levels in GF tissue compared with WT and CCL2−/−.

Of note, these changes appear to be restricted to the placenta, as PNS had no effect on tryptophan levels (t(22) = 0.009; p = 0.993), TPH2 expression (t(30) = 0.60; p = 0.554), 5-HT concentrations (t(22) = 0.47; p = 0.639), MAOA expression (t(31) = 1.24; p = 0.224), or 5-HIAA levels (t(22) = 0.003; p = 0.998) in the WT fetal brain (Supplementary Fig. 2a–e), and thus these outputs were not examined in CCL2−/− or GF fetal brain tissue. Together, our data suggest that PNS increases placental tryptophan and 5-HT availability in a manner that is at least partly dependent upon CCL2 and microbes.

PNS leads to CCL2-dependent behavioral abnormalities in adult offspring

WT PNS offspring exhibited deficits in social approach behavior (Fig. 5a; main effect of stress: f(1,19) = 5.61; p = 0.029, also reflected in representative heat maps, Fig. 5b) that were sex-dependent (main effect of sex: f(1,19) = 4.60; p = 0.045). In the light–dark preference test, PNS offspring had decreased latency to enter the dark zone (Fig. 5c; t(11.62) = 2.34; p = 0.038). Stress did not alter locomotor activity (t(13.80) = 0.09; p = 0.930) or initial side-preference within the social apparatus (t(21) = 0.33; p = 0.744; Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). While PNS did not impact duration of time in the light compartment (Supplementary Fig. 3c; t(23) = 0.62; p = 0.539) or locomotor activity in the light–dark preference test, female mice traveled a greater distance compared with male mice during testing (Supplementary Fig. 3d; main effect of sex: f(1,21) = 15.08; p = 0.0009).

Fig. 5: Prenatal stress leads to CCL2-dependent behavioral abnormalities in adult offspring.
figure5

WT offspring: a social approach index in the three-chamber social behavior test (n = 6, 5, 6, 6 mice in female control, female stress, male control, male stress conditions); b representative heat maps of time spent exploring the three chambers in the social behavior test; c latency to enter the dark chamber of the light–dark box (n = 11, 10 mice in control, stress conditions). CCL2−/− offspring: d social approach index (n = 9, 6, 9, 9 mice in female control, female stress, male control, male stress conditions); e representative heat maps of the social behavior test; f latency to enter the dark chamber of the light–dark box (n = 13, 9 mice in control, stress conditions). Bars represent mean ± SEM. T test: *p < 0.05. Two-way ANOVA: asterisks (*) represent main effect of sex (*p < 0.05); daggers (†) represent main effect of stress (†p < 0.05).

Notably, CCL2−/− offspring were protected from social deficits, as measured by the social approach index (Fig. 5d, e; stress effect: f(1,29) = 0.54; p = 0.470) and did not display sex differences (sex effect: f(1,26) = 0.02; p = 0.883). Similarly, CCL2−/− offspring did not differ in their latency to enter the dark zone during light–dark preference testing (Fig. 5f; t(21) = 0.59; p = 0.560). Although CCL2−/− locomotor activity did not differ due to PNS in the social apparatus (Supplementary Fig. 3e; t(32) = 0.64; p = 0.529), there was an initial side-preference (Supplementary Fig. 3f; main effect of sex: f(1,30) = 8.04; p = 0.008; main effect of stress: f(1,30) = 8.27; p = 0.007), which was addressed by randomization of the side in which the conspecific mouse was placed and by randomization of the order in which male and female offspring were tested. Duration spent in the light (Supplementary Fig. 3g; t(30) = 0.34; p = 0.734) and distance traveled (Supplementary Fig. 3h; t(21.84) = 0.78; p = 0.441) were not impacted by PNS or sex during light–dark testing. Together, our data indicate that PNS results in social- and anxiety-related behavioral abnormalities in the offspring, which are ameliorated in the absence of CCL2.

Discussion

We provide evidence that maternal microbes and the chemokine CCL2 play critical roles in mediating the sequelae of PNS, including intrauterine inflammatory and serotonergic dysfunction, as well as offspring behavioral abnormalities. This is the first time, to our knowledge, that maternal microbes and CCL2 have been linked to intrauterine inflammation and placental serotonin availability and that CCL2 has been implicated in mediating offspring behavioral deficits following PNS.

Recent clinical and preclinical studies suggest that PNS leads to inflammation in the intrauterine environment5,6,20,40,41. To extend these findings, we demonstrate that PNS increases CCL2 protein levels in the placenta and fetal brain. As a chemokine, CCL2 recruits circulating CCR2+ monocytes to infiltrate sites of active inflammation and mature into tissue macrophages or produce cytokines21. Thus, the reduced expression of CCR2 in the fetal brain could be due to a compensatory mechanism to counteract detrimental elevations in CCL2. As expected, a decrease in fetal brain CCR2 expression following PNS was not present in CCL2−/− mice.

Previously, our lab has shown that restraint stress alters the maternal gut microbiome5. Stress can increase permeability of the gut epithelial barrier, allowing microbes or microbial components to escape from the gut lumen and enter the bloodstream42,43,44. The presence of microbes in the intrauterine environment is highly controversial45,46,47, and was not investigated in the present study. Instead, GF tissues were examined to ascertain the necessity of maternal microbes in mediating the immunomodulatory effects of PNS in the intrauterine environment. To our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the GF intrauterine environment in the context of PNS, though prior studies have shown that GF mice exhibit aberrant behavior48,49 and an exaggerated stress response50. While placental CCL2 tended to increase in PNS GF animals, the GF fetal brain appeared to be protected from inflammatory signaling, with no change in CCL2 protein or CCR2 expression.

We next investigated the contribution of CCL2 and maternal microbes to PNS-induced inflammation in the intrauterine environment. Even if viable microbes are not present in the placenta, microbial components in the maternal bloodstream can initiate an immune response within the uterus by signaling through TLRs51; thus, we investigated bacterial LPS-receptor TLR4 as a potential mediator of stress-induced inflammation. In our model, restraint stress increased TLR4 gene expression in both WT and CCL2−/− placentas, and decreased expression in the fetal brain, suggesting that microbes or microbial components may be reaching the placenta and initiating an immune response. Furthermore, these data indicate that PNS-induced increases in TLR4 are independent of CCL2 production in the intrauterine environment, despite lower TLR4 expression in CCL2−/− placentas at baseline. Of note, PNS did not induce significant changes in placental or fetal brain TLR4 expression under GF conditions.

In addition to the alterations in TLR4 expression, cytokine expression was also dysregulated in the intrauterine environment following exposure to PNS. Specifically, stress enhanced expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL6 in the WT fetal brain, which was ameliorated in the CCL2−/− fetal brain. However, TNF expression was elevated in both WT and CCL2−/− fetal brains, suggesting that IL-6 production, in particular, might be dependent upon CCL2 signaling. These data are in line with previous reports demonstrating that recombinant CCL2 administered directly into the brain increases production of IL-6, but not TNF-α52. Overall, we theorize that PNS enhances CCL2 secretion in the fetal brain, which is necessary for IL6 upregulation. PNS did not alter fetal brain IL6 or TNF expression under GF conditions, suggesting that PNS does not induce fetal neuroimmune activation in the absence of maternal microbes. Since CCL2 levels are lower in GF mice compared with WT mice at baseline53, our findings further support the idea that PNS increases IL6 expression in the fetal brain in normal CCL2 conditions, but fails to do so when CCL2 is low or absent.

In contrast to the fetal brains, PNS did not alter placental IL6 expression in WT or CCL2−/− mice. However, PNS increased TNF expression in CCL2−/− placentas, but not in WT. Interestingly, in the absence of microbes, PNS also elevated expression of TNF in the placenta. Together, this may indicate that CCL2 suppresses placental TNF expression following PNS, which is distinct from the function of CCL2 in the developing brain. This is further consistent with the finding that administration of LPS to CCL2−/− mice increases serum TNF-α to a greater degree than in WT mice54,55, indicating that CCL2 may be suppressing or modulating TNF-α production in the face of an immune challenge.

One consideration in using GF and CCL2−/− mice is that their immune systems develop in a dramatically different fashion compared with WT mice. Indeed, exposure to commensal microbes is necessary for education and priming of immune cells, and GF mice have been shown to have deficits in function of both the innate and adaptive immune system56,57. However, there is evidence that GF mice are capable of producing IL-6 in response to restraint stress similar to WT mice58, suggesting that the absence of IL6 upregulation in GF fetal brains cannot be explained by baseline developmental differences in IL-6 production. On the other hand, CCL2−/− mice have impairments in recruiting monocytes to sites of infection, though the number of circulating leukocytes is similar to WT mice59. In our model, we observed slight but significant decreases in IL6 expression in CCL2−/− tissue compared with WT at baseline, but not TNF. Others have also shown that CCL2−/− mice are capable of mounting measurable, albeit blunted, neuroimmune responses to a peripheral immune challenge54, and that astrocytes from CCL2−/− brains are capable of increasing production of IL-6 and TNF in response to in vitro challenge60. These in vivo and in vitro responses are easily differentiated from baseline differences due to KO status, suggesting that the PNS-induced alterations in cytokine expression observed in our model cannot be attributed solely to developmental differences.

The presence of inflammatory cytokines in the brain can adversely impact neurodevelopment through various mechanisms, such as direct neuronal injury61,62, overall disruption of neuroimmune function28, and/or altered serotonergic metabolism29,35,63. We previously found that our model of maternal restraint stress leads to elevated levels of 5-HT in the plasma of male offspring that also exhibited decreased sociability4. 5-HT is a monoamine neurotransmitter that plays a key role in maintaining a healthy pregnancy, in addition to its role as a neurotrophic factor in the developing brain33,64. Indeed, high levels of placental serotonin have been associated with adverse outcomes in pregnancy, including intrauterine growth restriction65 and preeclampsia66, which have both been linked to neurodevelopmental disorders67,68. In our model, PNS increased concentrations of tryptophan and 5-HT in WT placentas, which was ameliorated in both CCL2−/− and GF placentas, indicating a key role of CCL2 and maternal microbes in modulating tryptophan and 5-HT availability. The lack of a stress effect on TPH1, TPH2, and MAOA expression further suggests that stress modulates availability of tryptophan and 5-HT rather than synthesis or breakdown. PNS also increased 5-HIAA concentrations; however, this elevation was evident regardless of CCL2 and GF status, suggesting that modifications to 5-HIAA may be independent of CCL2 and microbes. Additionally, the low levels of MAOA and 5-HIAA in GF placentas suggests that 5-HT breakdown is in-part dependent on microbes. Interestingly, PNS did not impact serotonin in the fetal brain; instead, our data suggest that PNS may mediate behavioral outcomes indirectly through imbalances in placental serotonin concentrations. Indeed, elevated levels of serotonin in the placenta can disrupt the development of serotonergic neurons in the fetal brain35, which presents an area for further investigation in this model. Finally, although our gene expression data suggest that PNS does not impact the enzymes involved in synthesizing and metabolizing 5-HT, we cannot rule out functional changes in the enzymes.

PNS is associated with anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors in offspring, and deficits in social interaction characteristic of autism spectrum disorders; this is evident both in rodent models4,5,6,7,8,69,70 and in humans71,72. Here, we show that PNS indeed leads to altered social and anxiety-like behaviors in adult offspring, which aligns with our previous findings4,5. Furthermore, our current dataset suggests that offspring behavioral deficits can manifest regardless of sex, though male offspring demonstrated greater preference for social stimuli compared with female offspring. The etiology of behavioral disruption is complex, often case-specific, and influenced by a multitude of factors. One such factor is exposure to elevated cytokines, particularly IL-6, during gestation73,74. Administration of IL-6 to pregnant mice induces offspring anxiety-like behavior75, and deletion of IL-6 receptor in trophoblast cells ameliorates deficits in sociability due to maternal inflammation76. Since PNS increased fetal brain IL-6, and this was mitigated in the absence of CCL2, we hypothesized that CCL2 would play an indirect role in regulating the development of aberrant behavior through the modification of IL-6. Indeed, the sociability deficits and anxiety-like behavior observed in WT adult offspring were ameliorated in CCL2−/− offspring. While the use of a global CCL2 KO animal in the present study indicates the necessity of CCL2 in disrupting the development of certain behavioral circuits, the exact timing and mechanism by which CCL2 acts prenatally still needs to be investigated. Conclusions about the role of microbes in behavioral regulation are limited by the baseline aberrant behavior observed GF mice, including social deficits and anxiolytic behavior48,77,78,79. Careful and meticulous dissection of behavioral outcomes in GF offspring due to PNS, not explored in the current study, represents an avenue for future investigation.

Despite the prevalence of stress in modern day society, and the deleterious effects of maternal stress exposure on neurodevelopment, options for treatment or prophylaxis are suboptimal. Here, we provide evidence of the critical role of microbes and CCL2 in mediating fetal brain inflammation and placental tryptophan and 5-HT availability following maternal stress and leading to aberrant sociability and anxiety-like behavior in adult offspring. Sex differences among certain parameters, but not all, indicate that vulnerability to PNS is partially sex-biased. Altogether, these data suggest that the sequelae of maternal stress have prenatal origins, and that maternal microbes and CCL2 are tantalizing targets for developing novel treatments.

References

  1. 1.

    Bale T. L. et al. Early life programming and neurodevelopmental disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 68, 314–319 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Van den Bergh B. R. H. et al. Prenatal developmental origins of behavior and mental health: the influence of maternal stress in pregnancy. Neurosci. Biobehav Rev. S0149-7634, 30734–30735 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Beversdorf, D. Q., Stevens, H. E. & Jones, K. L. Prenatal STress, Maternal Immune Dysregulation, and Their Association with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 20, 76 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gur T. L. et al. Prenatal stress disrupts social behavior, cortical neurobiology and commensal microbes in adult male offspring. Behav. Brain Res. 359, 886–894 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gur T. L. et al. Prenatal stress affects placental cytokines and neurotrophins, commensal microbes, and anxiety-like behavior in adult female offspring. Brain Behav. Immun. 64, 50–58 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bronson, S. L. & Bale, T. L. Prenatal stress-induced increases in placental inflammation and offspring hyperactivity are male-specific and ameliorated by maternal antiinflammatory treatment. Endocrinology 155, 2635–2646 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gumusoglu, S. B., Fine, R. S., Murray, S. J., Bittle, J. L. & Stevens, H. E. The role of IL-6 in neurodevelopment after prenatal stress. Brain Behav. Immun. 65, 274–283 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Weinstock, M. Prenatal stressors in rodents: effects on behavior. Neurobiol. Stress 6, 3–13 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gur, T. L. Worly, B. L. & Bailey, M. T. Stress and the commensal microbiota: importance in parturition and infant neurodevelopment. Front Psychiatry 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00005 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Chen, H. J. & Gur, T. L. Intrauterine microbiota: missing, or the missing link? Trends Neurosci. 42, 402–413 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Warner B. B. The contribution of the gut microbiome to neurodevelopment and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pediatr. Res. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0191-9 (2019).

  12. 12.

    Pronovost, G. N. & Hsiao, E. Y. Perinatal interactions between the microbiome, immunity, and neurodevelopment. Immunity 50, 18–36 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sampson, T. R. & Mazmanian, S. K. Control of brain development, function, and behavior by the microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 17, 565–576 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Abrahams, V. M. & Mor, G. Toll-like receptors and their role in the trophoblast. Placenta 26, 540–547 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Abrahams V. M. et al. Divergent trophoblast responses to bacterial products mediated by TLRs. J. Immunol. 173, 4286–4296 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Duval C. et al. Differential effect of LPS and IL-1β in term placental explants. Placenta 75, 9–15 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ahmad R. et al. The synergy between palmitate and TNF- α for CCL2 production is dependent on the TRIF/IRF3 pathway: implications for metabolic inflammation. J. Immunol. 200, 3599–3611 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Khosravi A. et al. Gut microbiota promote hematopoiesis to control bacterial infection. Cell Host Microbe 15, 374–381 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Castillo-Ruiz A. et al. The microbiota influences cell death and microglial colonization in the perinatal mouse brain. Brain Behav. Immun. 67, 218–229 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lian S. et al. Impact of prenatal cold stress on placental physiology, inflammatory response, and apoptosis in rats. Oncotarget 8, 115304–115314 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Deshmane, S. L., Kremlev, S., Amini, S. & Sawaya, B. E. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): an overview. J. Inter. Cytokine Res. 29, 313–326 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mckim D. B. et al. Microglial recruitment of IL-1β-producing monocytes to brain endothelium causes stress-induced anxiety. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 1421–1431 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Miller, A. H. & Raison, C. L. The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 22–34 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Renaud, S. J., Sullivan, R. & Graham, C. H. Tumour necrosis factor alpha stimulates the production of monocyte chemoattractants by extravillous trophoblast cells via differential activation of MAPK pathways. Placenta 30, 313–319 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pavličev M. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of the human placenta: inferring the cell communication network of the maternal-fetal interface. Genome Res. 27, 349–361 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Du, M. R., Wang, S. C. & Li, D.-J. The integrative roles of chemokines at the maternal-fetal interface in early pregnancy. Cell Mol. Immunol. 11, 438–448 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Dammann, O. & O’Shea, M. Cytokines and perinatal brain damage. Clin. Perinatol. 35, 643–663 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jiang, N. M., Cowan, M., Moonah, S. N. & Petri, W. A. The impact of systemic inflammation on neurodevelopment. Trends Mol. Med 24, 794–804 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Van Heesch F. et al. Lipopolysaccharide increases degradation of central monoamines: an in vivo microdialysis study in the nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex of mice. Eur. J. Pharm. 725, 55–63 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zhu C. B. et al. Interleukin-1 receptor activation by systemic lipopolysaccharide induces behavioral despair linked to MAPK regulation of CNS serotonin transporters. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 2510–2520 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Muller, C. L., Anacker, A. M. J. & Veenstra-VanderWeele, J. The serotonin system in autism spectrum disorder: from biomarker to animal models. Neuroscience 321, 24–41 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bjørklund G. et al. Immune dysfunction and neuroinflammation in autism spectrum disorder. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars.) 76, 257–268 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bonnin A. et al. A transient placental source of serotonin for the fetal forebrain. Nature 472, 347–350 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rubenstein J. L. R. Development of serotonergic neurons and their projections. Biol. Psychiatry 44, 145–150 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Goeden N. et al. Maternal inflammation disrupts fetal neurodevelopment via increased placental output of serotonin to the fetal brain. J. Neurosci. 36, 6041–6049 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Peters D. A. V. Maternal stress increases fetal brain and neonatal cerebral cortex 5-hydroxytryptamine synthesis in rats: a possible mechanism by which stress influences brain development. Pharm. Biochem Behav. 35, 943–947 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Götz, M. & Huttner, W. B. The cell biology of neurogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 777–788 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Müntener, M. & Hsu, Y. C. Development of the trophoblast and placenta of the mouse. Acta Anat. 98, 241–252 (1977).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Laurent L. et al. Human placenta expresses both peripheral and neuronal isoform of tryptophan hydroxylase. Biochimie 140, 159–165 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hantsoo, L., Kornfield, S., Anguera, M. C. & Epperson, C. N. Inflammation: a proposed intermediary between maternal stress and offspring neuropsychiatric risk. Biol. Psychiatry 85, 97–106 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Miller G. E. et al. Maternal socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with transcriptional indications of greater immune activation and slower tissue maturation in placental biopsies and newborn cord blood. Brain Behav. Immun. 64, 276–284 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kéri, S., Szabó, C. & Kelemen, O. Expression of toll-like receptors in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and response to cognitive-behavioral therapy in major depressive disorder. Brain Behav. Immun. 40, 235–243 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kiecolt-Glaser J. K. et al. Marital distress, depression, and a leaky gut: translocation of bacterial endotoxin as a pathway to inflammation. Psychoneuroendocrinology 98, 52–60 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Maes, M., Kubera, M. & Leunis, J.-C. The gut-brain barrier in major depression- translocation of LPS from gram negative enterobacteria plays a role in the inflammatory pathophysiology of depression. Neuroendocrinol. Lett. 29, 117–124 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lauder A. P. et al. Comparison of placenta samples with contamination controls does not provide evidence for a distinct placenta microbiota. Microbiome 4, 29 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Aagaard K. et al. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 237ra65 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Leiby J. S. et al. Lack of detection of a human placenta microbiome in samples from preterm and term deliveries. Microbiome 6, 196 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Desbonnet, L., Clarke, G., Shanahan, F., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota is essential for social development in the mouse. Mol. Psychiatry 19, 146–148 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Luczynski P. et al. Growing up in a bubble: using germ-free animals to assess the influence of the gut microbiota on brain and behavior. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 19, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyw020 (2016).

  50. 50.

    Sudo N. et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J. Physiol. 558, 263–275 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Iwasaki, A. & Medzhitov, R. Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Nat. Immunol. 16, 343–353 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rankine, E. L., Hughes, P. M., Botham, M. S., Perry, V. H. & Felton, L. M. Brain cytokine synthesis induced by an intraparenchymal injection of LPS is reduced in MCP-1-deficient mice prior to leucocyte recruitment. Eur. J. Neurosci. 24, 77–86 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Swiecki, M. et al. Microbiota induces tonic CCL2 systemic levels that control pDC trafficking in steady state. Mucosal Immunol. 10, 936–945 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Thompson W. L., Karpus W. J., Van Eldik L. J. MCP-1-deficient mice show reduced neuroinflammatory responses and increased peripheral inflammatory responses to peripheral endotoxin insult. J. Neuroinflammation 5, https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-5-35 (2008).

  55. 55.

    DePaolo, R. W., Lathan, R., Rollins, B. J. & Karpus, W. J. The chemokine CCL2 is required for control of murine gastric Salmonella enterica infection. Infect. Immun. 73, 6514–6522 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Round, J. L. & Mazmanian, S. K. The gut microbiome shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 313–323 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kuhn, K. A. & Stappenbeck, T. S. Peripheral education of the immune system by the colonic microbiota. Semin Immunol. 25, 364–369 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Nukina H. et al. Restraint stress elevates the plasma interleukin-6 levels in germ-free mice. J. Neuroimmunol. 115, 46–52 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lu B. et al. Abnormalities in monocyte recruitment and cytokine expression in monocyte chemoattractant protein 1-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 187, 601–608 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Semple, B. D., Frugier, T. & Morganti-Kossmann, M. C. CCL2 modulates cytokine production in cultured mouse astrocytes. J. Neuroinflammation 7, 67 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Elovitz M. A. et al. Intrauterine inflammation, insufficient to induce parturition, still evokes fetal and neonatal brain injury. Int J. Dev. Neurosci. 29, 663–671 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Burd I. et al. Inflammation-induced preterm birth alters neuronal morphology in the mouse fetal brain. J. Neurosci. Res 88, 1872–1881 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Mössner R. et al. Enhancement of serotonin transporter function by tumor necrosis factor alpha but not by interleukin-6. Neurochem. Int. 33, 251–254 (1998).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Gaspar, P., Cases, O. & Maroteaux, L. The developmental role of serotonin: news from mouse molecular genetics. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 1002–1012 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ranzil S. et al. Disrupted placental serotonin synthetic pathway and increased placental serotonin: potential implications in the pathogenesis of human fetal growth restriction. Placenta 84, 74–83 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Bolte, A. C., Van Geijn, H. P. & Dekker, G. A. Pathophysiology of preeclampsia and the role of serotonin. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 95, 12–21 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Maher G. M. et al. Association of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 75, 809–819 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Lampi K. M. et al. Risk of autism spectrum disorders in low birth weight and small for gestational age infants. J. Pediatr. 161, 830–836 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Zohar, I., Shoham, S. & Weinstock, M. Perinatal citalopram does not prevent the effect of prenatal stress on anxiety, depressive-like behaviour and serotonergic transmission in adult rat offspring. Eur. J. Neurosci. 43, 590–600 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Salomon, S., Bejar, C., Schorer-Apelbaum, D. & Weinstock, M. Corticosterone mediates some but not other behavioural changes induced by prenatal stress in rats. J. Neuroendocrinol. 23, 118–128 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ramborger, M. E., Zorrilla Zubilete, M. A. & Beatriz Acosta, G. Prenatal stress and its effects of human cognition, behavior and psychopathology: a review of the literature. Pediatr. Dimens 3, 1–6 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Beydoun, H. & Saftlas, A. F. Physical and mental health outcomes of prenatal maternal stress in human and animal studies: a review of recent evidence. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 22, 438–466 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Graham A. M. et al. Maternal systemic interleukin-6 during pregnancy is associated with newborn amygdala phenotypes and subsequent behavior at 2 years of age. Biol. Psychiatry 83, 109–119 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Smith, S. E. P., Li, J., Garbett, K., Mirnics, K. & Patterson, P. H. Maternal immune activation alters fetal brain development through interleukin-6. J. Neurosci. 27, 10695–10702 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Hsiao, E. Y. & Patterson, P. H. Activation of the maternal immune system induces endocrine changes in the placenta via IL-6. Brain Behav. Immun. 25, 604–615 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wu, W.-L., Hsiao, E. Y., Yan, Z., Mazmanian, S. K. & Patterson, P. H. The placental interleukin-6 signaling controls fetal brain development and behavior. Brain Behav. Immun. 62, 11–23 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Diaz Heijtz R. et al. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3047–3052 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Clarke G. et al. The microbiome-gut-brain axis during early life regulates the hippocampal serotonergic system in a sex-dependent manner. Mol. Psychiatry 18, 666–673 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Luo Y. et al. Gut microbiota regulates mouse behaviors through glucocorticoid receptor pathway genes in the hippocampus. Transl. Psychiatry 8, 187 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by K08MH112892, R21MH117552, KL2TR001068, and start-up funds from the Ohio State University to T.L.G., T32 NS105864 to H.J.C., and UL1TR001080 to the OSU CCTS. The financial support for the Quantiva QQQ instrument was provided by OSU and OSUCC.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamar L. Gur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H.J., Antonson, A.M., Rajasekera, T.A. et al. Prenatal stress causes intrauterine inflammation and serotonergic dysfunction, and long-term behavioral deficits through microbe- and CCL2-dependent mechanisms. Transl Psychiatry 10, 191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-00876-5

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links