Abstract
The present study intends to investigate the effect of lithium (Li) and celecoxib (Cel) coadministration on the behavioral status and oxidative stress parameters in a rat model of mania induced by dextroamphetamine (d-AMPH). Male Wistar rats were treated with d-AMPH or saline (Sal) for 14 days; on the 8th day of treatment, rats received lithium (Li), celecoxib (Cel), Li plus Cel, or water until day 14. Levels of oxidative stress parameters were evaluated in the serum, frontal cortex, and hippocampus. d-AMPH administration induced hyperlocomotion in rats, which was significantly reversed by Li and Cel coadministration. In addition, d-AMPH administration induced damage to proteins and lipids in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of rats. All these impairments were reversed by treatment with Li and/or Cel, in a way dependent on cerebral area and biochemical analysis. Li and Cel coadministration reversed the d-AMPH-induced decrease in catalase activity in cerebral structures. The activity of glutathione peroxidase was decreased in the frontal cortex of animals receiving d-AMPH, and treatment with Li, Cel, or a combination thereof reversed this alteration in this structure. Overall, data indicate hyperlocomotion and alteration in oxidative stress biomarkers in the cerebral structures of rats receiving d-AMPH. Li and Cel coadministration can mitigate these modifications, comprising a potential novel approach for BD therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a prominent, impactful psychiatric disorder affecting moods, whose lifetime prevalence is ~ 5%1,2. The precise pathophysiology of BD remains unclear3. However, oxidative stress is linked to this condition, as alterations in the activity of antioxidant enzymes and other oxidative disturbances have been reported in BD patients4.
The clinical hallmark of BD is the manic episodes, including euphoria, hyperactivity, insomnia, or hypersexuality, so that animal models able to reproduce mania are one of the experimental resources most used in BD research5,6. In this scenario, hyperlocomotion, altered pattern of sleep, and risk behavior were observed in the animal model of mania induced by amphetamine7,8,9. In addition, administration of mood stabilizer drugs, including valproate, can counteract the effect of amphetamine on the locomotion of rats submitted to such dopaminergic model, which supports its validity for the study of the mood disorder7. The main limitations of the mania model induced by dextroamphetamine (d-AMPH) in rodents, besides it be a chemically induced model, include mimicking drug abuse symptoms10,11 and psychosis-related behaviors (at higher doses)12,13,14.
The BD standard therapy comprises lithium (Li, as carbonate salt) and anticonvulsants, such as valproate15. Nevertheless, certain side effects, namely weight gain, polyuria, bradykinesia, sexual dysfunction, and others render the patients affected by the disorder prone to noncompliance to therapy16,17. Thus, the design of new therapeutic strategies aiming to minimize or eliminate such undesirable consequences of traditional BD therapy is probably a promising field of research at present.
On the other hand, celecoxib (Cel) was the first anti-inflammatory drug inhibiting the cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme (EC 1.14.99.1) with approval for use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)18. Cel was also showed to be useful as adjunct therapy of manic or depressive symptoms19,20, in part owing to the finding that a proinflammatory state could be associated with BD21. An immune or inflammatory imbalance in the pathophysiology of this mood disorder could constitute a new platform for the development of novel therapeutic approaches22.
Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effect of Li and Cel coadministration on the behavioral status and oxidative stress parameters in rats submitted to the dopaminergic model of mania induced by d-AMPH.
Material and methods
Animals
Adult male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus; 250–350 g) obtained from the Central Animal House of University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNESC) were used. Rats were caged in groups of five animals and had ad libitum access to water and standard chow. A light/dark cycle (12:12 h; lights on at 7:00 h) at constant temperature (22 ± 1 °C) was maintained in the colony room. All experiments followed The “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” (National Institutes of Health publication no. 80–23, revised in 1996) and the “EC Directive 86/609/EEC”. This study was only carried out with previous approval by the Local Ethics Committee on Animal Use for Research (protocol # 056/2015–2). All efforts were made to reduce the number of animals and their suffering. Thus, the experiment was carried out with n = 12 animals per group.
Reagents
d-AMPH was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, Missouri, United States), whereas Li (carbonate salt) was obtained from Eurofarma (São Paulo city, São Paulo, Brazil) and Cel from Getz Pharma (Karachi, Pakistan). d-AMPH was diluted in saline solution (Sal; NaCl 0.9%) to enable the intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of the drug. Li and Cel tablets were macerated, and the resulting powder was added to water until form a suspension orally administered to the rats. These suspensions were then kept on a magnetic mixer in order to maintain constant concentrations of the drugs during the administrations.
Experimental design
Rats received d-AMPH (2 mg per kg body weight [mg/kg]) or Sal during 14 days. Each drug was administered once a day, i.p. From the day 8–14, animals from d-AMPH and Sal groups orally received Li (24 mg/kg), Cel (20 mg/kg), a combination thereof or water. Li was administered twice a day (12:12 h), whereas Cel was only administered once a day. At day 15, rats received an i.p. injection of d-AMPH or Sal and 2 h later were submitted to the behavioral analysis. Thus, the experimental groups in the present study are as follows: (i) Sal + water; (ii) Sal + Li; (iii) Sal + Cel; (iv) Sal + Li + Cel; (v) d-AMPH + water; (vi) d-AMPH + Li; (vii) d-AMPH + Cel; and (viii) d-AMPH + Li + Cel. Dosage of Cel and d-AMPH was following previous studies7,23, but the dose of Li was equal to the half of those administered in the study performed by Frey and coworkers7.
Behavioral analysis
Behavioral status was assessed through the open-field test. In this procedure, hyperlocomotion or hyperactivity induced in the animal model is a parameter associated to mania, which characterizes the BD9. Open-field test was carried out in a 40 × 60 cm box, whose 50 cm-height-walls are made of brown fiberboard, except the frontal wall, which is made of glass. The floor of the box is divided into nine equal rectangles by black lines. To freely explore the area for at least 5 min, the animals are gently put on the left posterior square. During the procedure, the number of crossings and rearings provides consistent information on the rat behavior and locomotion24.
Sample preparation
After behavioral analysis, rats were killed by decapitation without anesthesia, the skull was opened, and the cerebral content was excised and rapidly dissected on a chilled dish Petri. The frontal cortex and hippocampus were isolated and cleaned from the subcortical structures and white matter. Peripheral blood samples were immediately collected after decapitation and submitted to centrifugation at 10,000 rpm during 15 min aiming to obtain the serum. Until the analyses were performed, all samples were kept frozen at −80 °C.
Protein carbonyl content
The determination of the carbonyl content was performed in samples of the cerebral structures and serum previously homogenized in sodium phosphate buffer 20 mM and potassium chloride 140 mM (pH 7.4). In brief, the principle of the method is based on the binding of carbonyl groups present in the samples to the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) forming aliphatic hydrazones, whose absorbance values were spectrophotometrically determined at 360 nm wavelength (λ), using blanks to each sample. Such information correlates to the carbonyl group content in the samples. Data were expressed as nmol/mL25.
Level of thiobarbituric acid-reactive species
The levels of the thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS), malondialdehyde (MDA), were measured in samples of the cerebral structures and serum homogenized in chilled PBS buffer (pH 7.4). Homogenates were mixed with trichloroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) 10% aiming to form a precipitate, and sodium sulfate was added to supernatants at a 1:1 v/v ratio. After centrifugation, thiobarbituric acid (Sigma-Aldrich) 0.67% was added to supernatants, at this same v/v ratio. The resulting mixture was submitted to heating for 2 h and then cooled with water at room temperature. Measuring of absorbance values was performed in a spectrophotometer at λ = 532 nm. Data were expressed as MDA equivalents nmol/mg protein26.
Catalase enzyme activity
The catalase (CAT; EC 1.11.1.6) activity was evaluated in samples of the cerebral structures and serum according to a standardized procedure27. First, Triton 0.1% was added to the sample homogenates, and the resulting mixture was incubated on ice for 15 min. Hydrogen peroxide 30% v/v was then added to potassium phosphate buffer 10 mM, pH 7.0, and the resulting solution was put on a quartz cuvette. SpectraMax microplate spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, California, United States) was calibrated with a blank separately run from phosphate buffer. After sample addition, a decrease in hydrogen peroxide absorbance was measured using the microplate photometer at λ = 240 nm during 3 min, with 30 s as an interval between measurements. Data were expressed as U/mg protein.
Glutathione peroxidase enzyme activity
Glutathione peroxidase (GPx; EC 1.11.1.9) activity in samples of the cerebral structures and serum was measured by Wendel’s method28, with tert-butyl hydroperoxide used as substrate. Into each tube containing sample was added potassium phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 7.0, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 1 mM, sodium azide 40 mM, reduced glutathione 100 mM, glutathione reductase (EC 1.6.4.2) 10 U/mL and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate 10 mM. The resulting mixture was incubated for 1 min at 25 °C. Thereafter, enzyme reaction was started after the addition of tert-butyl hydroperoxide 10 mM. Blanks were prepared using phosphate buffer instead of the sample. A decrease in absorbance at λ = 340 nm was followed during 300 s in a SpectraMax microplate photometer. Calculated GPx activity was expressed as nmol min−1 mL−1.
Statistical analysis
The variables were analyzed according to their distribution through Shapiro Wilk’s test for normality. The Levene test assessed the homogeneity of variances among groups. All data were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean and were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test when F value was significant. Statistica 7 software (Dell Software, Round Rock, TX, USA) was used to perform all analyses. The differences between groups were rated as statistically significant at p < 0.05. The software used to generate the figure graphs was GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Results
Behavioral analyses
It was performed the open-field test to evaluate rat locomotion, expressed as the number of crossings and rearings (Fig. 1). It was observed that rats receiving d-AMPH presented a marked pattern of locomotion characterized by an increased number of crossings and rearings, as compared with the Sal + water group animals. Coadministration of Li and Cel reversed the increase in crossings and rearings induced by d-AMPH.
Data from three-way ANOVA revealed significant effects of d-AMPH administration [crossing: F(1, 80) = 18.84, p < 0.001; rearing: F(1, 80) = 14.38, p < 0.001], treatment [crossing: F(1, 80) = 5.50, p = 0.02; rearing: F(1, 80) = 0.08, p = 0.77], d-AMPH administration × treatment interaction [crossing: F(1, 80) = 2.44, p = 0.12; rearing: F(1, 80) = 3.63, p = 0.06] and d-AMPH administration × Cel plus Li interaction [crossing: F(1, 80) = 0.55, p = 0.46; rearing: F(1, 80) = 0.02, p = 0.88].
Protein carbonyl content
Figure 2 depicts the findings on carbonyl content determination. In rat serum, no significant differences between groups were detected. However, this parameter was significantly increased in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of animals receiving water plus d-AMPH, as compared with Sal + water group. Treatment with Li or Li plus Cel reversed the increase in carbonyl content induced by d-AMPH. Also, significant decreases in the carbonyl content were detected in the frontal cortex of rats submitted to the model of mania that received Cel (d-AMPH + Cel group); however, carbonyl levels in this group remained higher than those detected in the Sal + water group animals. Administration Li plus Cel to the animals submitted to the model of mania (d-AMPH + Li + Cel group) also reversed the increase in the carbonyl content induced by d-AMPH in the hippocampus. Interestingly, a significant decrease in this parameter was detected in the hippocampus of rats receiving d-AMPH plus Li, as compared with Sal + water and d-AMPH + water groups.
Data from three-way ANOVA revealed significant effects of d-AMPH administration [frontal cortex: F(1, 28) = 11.91, p < 0.01; hippocampus: F(1, 30) = 0.57, p = 0.45; serum: F(1, 32) = 0.03, p = 0.86], treatment [frontal cortex: F(1, 28) = 20.01, p < 0.001; hippocampus: F(1, 30) = 13.91, p < 0.001; serum: F(1, 32) = 2.06, p = 0.16], d-AMPH administration × treatment interaction [frontal cortex: F(1, 28) = 0.92, p = 0.35; hippocampus: F(1, 30) = 1.49, p = 0.23; serum: F(1, 32) = 0.20, p = 0.66] and d-AMPH administration × Cel plus Li interaction [frontal cortex: F(1, 28) = 0.57, p = 0.45; hippocampus: F(1, 30) = 1.30, p = 0.26; serum: F(1, 32) = 0.01, p = 0.92].
TBARS levels
The next step of the present study was to evaluate the content of TBARS in serum, frontal cortex, and hippocampus samples of rats (Fig. 3). A significant decrease in this parameter was detected in animals submitted to the model of mania receiving Li or Cel, as compared with the Sal + water group. In contrast, a marked increase in this parameter was observed in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of rats only receiving water plus d-AMPH, as compared with Sal + water group. Animals submitted to the experimental model receiving Li or Cel (d-AMPH + Li or d-AMPH + Cel groups), but not Li plus Cel (d-AMPH + Li + Cel), presented a significant decrease in TBARS level detected in the frontal cortex, as compared with the rats only receiving water plus d-AMPH. Also, a significant decrease in this parameter was observed in the hippocampus of animals submitted to the model receiving Li, Cel or Li plus Cel, in comparison to the rats in similar conditions but only receiving water plus d-AMPH.
Data from three-way ANOVA revealed significant effects of d-AMPH administration [frontal cortex: F(1, 36) = 0.26, p = 0.61; hippocampus: F(1, 38) = 7.26, p = 0.01; serum: F(1, 36) = 1.20, p = 0.66], treatment [frontal cortex: F(1, 36) = 1.11, p = 0.30; hippocampus: F(1, 38) = 11.92, p < 0.01; serum: F(1, 36) = 0.01, p = 0.91], d-AMPH administration × treatment interaction [frontal cortex: F(1, 36) = 4.86, p = 0.034; hippocampus: F(1, 38) = 13.05, p < 0.001; serum: F(1, 36) = 4.67, p = 0.03] and d-AMPH administration × Cel plus Li interaction [frontal cortex: F(1, 36) = 11.70, p < 0.01; hippocampus: F(1, 38) = 11.82, p < 0.01; serum: F(1, 36) = 0.33, p = 0.56].
CAT enzyme activity
Another important marker of oxidative stress evaluated in the present study was the activity of the CAT enzyme (Fig. 4). In rat serum, it was detected no significant differences in this parameter between groups. Nevertheless, a significant decrease in CAT activity was observed in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of animals submitted to the d-AMPH administration and receiving water, Li or Cel, as compared with the Sal + water group. A significant recovery of the enzyme activity in these cerebral structures was only detected when the rats submitted to the experimental model received Li plus Cel, in comparison with the animals receiving water plus d-AMPH.
Data from three-way ANOVA revealed significant effects of d-AMPH administration [frontal cortex: F(1, 31) = 10.86, p < 0.01; hippocampus: F(1, 27) = 4.92, p = 0.03; serum: F(1, 32) = 2.86, p = 0.10], treatment [frontal cortex: F(1, 31) = 2.03, p = 0.16; hippocampus: F(1, 27) = 1.26, p = 0.27; serum: F(1, 32) = 3.16, p = 0.085], d-AMPH administration × treatment interaction [frontal cortex: F(1, 31) = 6.72, p = 0.014; hippocampus: F(1, 27) = 1.54, p = 0.22; serum: F(1, 32) = 0.96, p = 0.33] and d-AMPH administration × Cel plus Li interaction [frontal cortex: F(1, 31) = 7.08, p = 0.012; hippocampus: F(1, 27) = 2.96, p = 0.097; serum: F(1, 32) = 0.73, p = 0.40].
GPx enzyme activity
The last parameter investigated in the present work was the activity of GPx enzyme (Fig. 5). In rat serum, a significant decrease in this parameter was detected in animals receiving d-AMPH plus Cel, as compared with Sal + water group. In contrast, a marked increase in the GPx activity was observed in the frontal cortex of rats only receiving water plus d-AMPH and in the hippocampus of animals submitted to the d-AMPH administration and treated with Li plus Cel. In the frontal cortex, a significant decrease of this enzyme activity was detected in rats submitted to the d-AMPH administration and treated with Li, Cel or Li plus Cel, in comparison with animals only receiving water plus d-AMPH.
Data from three-way ANOVA revealed significant effects of d-AMPH administration [frontal cortex: F(1, 32) = 22.15, p < 0.001; hippocampus: F(1, 30) = 0.39, p = 0.53; serum: F(1, 36) = 0.22, p = 0.64], treatment [frontal cortex: F(1, 32) = 15.94, p < 0.001; hippocampus: F(1, 30) = 0.16, p = 0.69; serum: F(1, 36) = 1.23, p = 0.27], d-AMPH administration × treatment interaction [frontal cortex: F(1, 32) = 8.96, p < 0.01; hippocampus: F(1, 30) = 2.38, p = 0.13; serum: F(1, 36) = 11.13, p < 0.01] and d-AMPH administration × Cel plus Li interaction [frontal cortex: F(1, 32) = 7.05, p = 0.012; hippocampus: F(1, 30) = 0.11, p = 0.74; serum: F(1, 36) = 3.52, p = 0.07].
Discussion
In the present study, d-AMPH administration elicited hyperlocomotion in rats, which correlates with manic behavior or hyperactivity in BD patients9. Following the data provided by behavioral analysis, previous evidence showed that the administration of d-AMPH induces hyperactivity in rats29,30. Furthermore, studies have suggested 47.5 mg/kg body weight as the therapeutic dose of Li7,30. It was observed here that the administration of such drug at a lower dose (24 mg/kg) did not mitigate the hyperlocomotion induced by d-AMPH in the animals. However, this dose was used to investigate the putative therapeutic potential of Li and Cel coadministration, owing to the need for potential reduction of Li side effects (at 47.5 mg/kg).
The administration of Cel elicited no significant effect on the hyperactivity induced by d-AMPH in rats, but the administration of this cyclooxygenase inhibitor (20 mg/kg) plus Li (24 mg/kg) significantly abrogated the effect of d-AMPH. Recently, a study showed that coadministration of these drugs in the same doses also was implicated in a decrease in the hyperlocomotion of rats induced by d-AMPH31. Interestingly, it was reported that the administration of Cel during two weeks was showed to reverse the hyperactivity observed in bulbectomized animals32. In addition, the role of certain anti-inflammatory drugs as potential adjuvants for BD therapy has been investigated. A placebo-controlled, randomized trial showed that patients affected by such disorder receiving Cel during 1 week presented a significant improvement in their depressive symptoms, as compared with the placebo group19. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors were also implicated in the modulation of behaviors depending on dopaminergic neurotransmission, as described in the study headed by Ross using indomethacin in order to regulate the hyperactivity induced by d-AMPH (1 mg/kg)33.
Evidence regarding the pharmacological action of Cel on the dopaminergic neuronal pathway is scarce yet. Nevertheless, inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by this drug was implicated in the regulation of dopamine levels, as described in a schizophrenia model induced by intracranial injection of epidermal growth factor in rats34. Moreover, Cel was reported to mitigate the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons induced by intrastriatal injection of 6-hydroxydopamine—an effect partly mediated by inhibition of microglia activity35. Cel administration (20 mg/kg) also alleviated the behavioral abnormalities, dopaminergic dysfunction, and produced a decrease in the levels of activated microglia in the brain of young rats submitted to the model of neuroinflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide36. Thus, here was speculate that Cel could regulate the activity of dopaminergic signaling underlying the hyperactivity observed in rats receiving d-AMPH, whereas the administration of Li could enhance this modulation. Whether this central pharmacological action of Cel involves the abrogation of microglia activation potentially induced by d-AMPH is an issue that requires further investigation.
Indeed, there is evidence indicating that the decrease in dopamine synthesis and increase in intracellular levels of such neurotransmitter could counteract and induce the activation of microglia in the striatum of animals, respectively36,37, which provides a potential link between the administration of d-AMPH and inflammatory response in the dopaminergic model of mania using this drug. Besides, aberrant levels of proinflammatory mediators termed cytokines has been reported in the serum of bipolar patients38. As amphetamines elicit persistent damage to dopaminergic neurons, the subsequent microglia activation could, in turn, collaborate to the release of certain cytokines39. Thus, it cannot be ruled out that Li and Cel mutually act to mitigate the proinflammatory state reported in animal models of mania and bipolar patients, possibly through the inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme and regulation of cytokine levels40,41.
Oxidative stress is also proposed as a crucial factor for the cytotoxicity elicited by amphetamines42. The increase in the level of reactive oxygen species induced by d-AMPH may lead to the release of cytochrome c and mitochondrial DNA into the cytosol, subsequently resulting in cellular damage and inflammatory response43,44. Indeed, it was observed that the administration of d-AMPH induced oxidative damage to lipids (evaluated as TBARS levels) and proteins (as carbonyl content), whereas decreased the activity of CAT and GPx antioxidant enzymes in rat brain. It is worthy to note that Frey et al.8 also detected an increased level of TBARS in the hippocampus and frontal cortex samples of rats submitted to the dopaminergic model of mania, which was consistent to oxidative stress in the brain of these animals. As oxidative stress is an imbalance between the generation of reactive oxygen species and the biological antioxidant defenses45, the present study suggests that lipid and protein oxidative damage elicited by d-AMPH could in part be a consequence of the CAT and GPx inhibition.
Administration of Cel significantly reversed the increased TBARS level induced by d-AMPH in the brain of rats, whereas partially reversed the increased carbonyl content in the frontal cortex. Such finding corroborates by a study showing that the administration of Cel can mitigate oxidative lipid damage46. However, the present study was the first to indicate that the administration of Cel significantly prevents the protein carbonylation induced by d-AMPH. Potential mechanisms involved in the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of Cel include a decrease in the synthesis of cytokines and the release of excitatory amino acids, modulation of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (EC 1.14.13.39) pathway and decrease in the generation of hydroxyl radical (•OH)47.
On the other hand, the decreased activity of CAT in rats receiving d-AMPH was not affected by the Cel administration. Accordingly, Venugopal and Prakash48 showed a dose-dependent effect of Cel on the CAT activity in an experimental model of neuroinflammation: 10 mg/kg was not able to alter the activity of the enzyme, whereas a significantly increased CAT activity was detected in response to a higher dose of the drug (50 mg/kg). In this scenario, the dose of Cel used in the present study (20 mg/kg) was unable to modify the activity of this enzyme. However, Cel (20 mg/kg) modulated the activity of GPx in animals submitted to the model of mania, whereas it was reported that the coadministration of Cel and cisplatin or tumoral necrosis factor (TNF)-α decreased the levels of GPx49. Overall, these studies and the findings of the present study indicate that Cel regulation of CAT and GPx activities are part of antioxidant action mechanism of the drug.
Under previous work, administration of Li reversed the oxidative lipid damage in the brain of rats submitted to the model of mania8. Such drug was also implicated in decreased carbonyl content in these animals. This finding seems to agree with other preclinical work, which showed that the administration of Li (47.5 mg/kg) reversed the increase in the carbonyl content induced by methamphetamine50. Furthermore, Li was showed to prevent the mitochondrial electron transport chain complexes from damage elicited by d-AMPH29. Taking into account that reactive oxygen species are mainly generated in mitochondria51, it could be suggested that Li exerts the aforementioned antioxidant roles partly through the modulation of the mitochondrial respiratory chain activity. Indeed, neuroprotective activity was also assigned to this mood stabilizer, collaborating to its therapeutic properties52.
It was also observed that the administration of Li abrogated the alteration in the activity of GPx, but not in CAT, in animals receiving d-AMPH. This finding partly agrees with the paper performed by Macêdo and colleagues53, which showed that Li at the therapeutic dose (47.5 mg/kg) significantly regulated GPx activity in the presence of lisdexamphetamine. In contrast to the present work, Li at the therapeutic range significantly reversed the modification in the activity of CAT elicited by d-AMPH8. Although the activity of these enzymes was not linear in most of the samples, there was a linear association between CAT and GPx activities, which indicates that each cerebral structure could present a typical pattern of antioxidant enzyme activity in response to d-AMPH.
Coadministration of Li and Cel counteracted the increase in cerebral carbonyl content and TBARS level in hippocampus of animals receiving d-AMPH. In contrast to the single administration of each drug, only the combined approach was able to mitigate the alterations in the antioxidant enzymes detected in the model of mania. According to the described elsewhere, both Li and Cel present antioxidant properties54,55. Concerning the combined administration of these drugs, Phelan and coworkers56 reported that Li presents a possible pharmacokinetic interaction with Cel. More specifically, these researchers showed that the plasma level of Li increased by 99% when this drug was administered with Cel56, which could be related to the ability of Cel to decrease Li renal clearance57. Thus, Cel could increase the plasma levels of the mood stabilizer, although the levels of Li in rat serum were not measured in the present study.
On the other hand, it cannot be ruled out that both drugs could also act synergistically. Indeed, Cel and Li exhibit either anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities58,59, which could be of interest for BD, as increased levels of inflammation markers (e.g., interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and soluble receptors for IL-2 and TNF) were detected in the serum of bipolar patients60. These findings are consistent with the inflammatory hypothesis for BD manic symptoms61. It is worthy to note that proinflammatory cytokines were implicated in the depletion of 5-hydroxytryptamine in the central nervous system58. In contrast, Cel per se was also associated with a moderate antidepressant activity19,62,63, which could be in part related to the ability of the drug to enhance 5-hydroxytryptamine release in the medial prefrontal cortex64.
Therefore, regarding present findings and all the studies above, it is possible that Li and Cel act in order to stabilize the moods and prevent the oxidative damage by one or more of the following mechanisms: (1) regulation of the dopamine levels through inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 triggered by Cel; (2) inhibition of microglia activity via a decrease in dopamine synthesis in the striatum; (3) the decrease in the synthesis of cytokines and the release of excitatory amino acids, as well as modulation of the inducible nitric oxide synthase pathway (especially Cel); (4) modulation of the electron transport chain activity, preventing the mitochondrial complexes from the damage elicited by d-AMPH (especially Li); (5) a possible pharmacokinetic interaction between Li and Cel, characterized by a decrease in the renal clearance of the mood stabilizer induced by the anti-inflammatory drug; (6) since proinflammatory cytokines were implicated in decreased 5-hydroxytryptamine levels in the brain, Cel could counteract this depletion, in part enhancing the release of the neurotransmitter in the medial prefrontal cortex.
In summary, hyperlocomotion and significant alteration in oxidative stress biomarkers were detected in the cerebral structures of rats submitted to a model of mania induced by d-AMPH, corroborating with previous observations that such chemical species are involved in the pathophysiology of BD. Administration of Li plus Cel can mitigate these imbalances, rendering this combined approach a potential novel therapeutic option to the management of BD. Additional preclinical research is also needed to explore the safety of this promising combined therapy in the context of BD.
Limitations of the study
Measurements of Li serum levels were not performed. Besides, one of the most critical advantages of preclinical research in Psychiatry reflects the possibility to establish an engagement of a specific neurotherapeutic target. However, current findings are still correlational and do not provide this level of evidence, which highlights the importance of further research in the field. Despite these drawbacks, the principal aims of the present study were to provide additional evidence to support further preclinical and clinical research on the Li and Cel coadministration, as well as provide a drug repositioning strategy based on the anti-inflammatory drug.
References
Proudfoot, J. G. et al. What happens after diagnosis? Understanding the experiences of patients with newly-diagnosed bipolar disorder. Health Expect. 12, 120–129 (2009).
Subramaniam, M. et al. Impact of psychiatric disorders and chronic physical conditions on health-related quality of life: Singapore Mental Health Study. J. Affect. Disord. 147, 325–330 (2013).
American Psychiatric Association. Bipolar Disorder and Relationship. In American Psychiatric Association (ed). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC, 2013, pp 123–155.
Andreazza, A. C. et al. 3-Nitrotyrosine and glutathione antioxidant system in patients in the early and late stages of bipolar disorder. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 34, 263–271 (2009).
Belmaker, R. H. & Bersudsky, Y. Bipolar disorder: mania and depression. Discov. Med 4, 239–245 (2004).
Valvassori, S. S., Budni, J., Varela, R. B. & Quevedo, J. Contributions of animal models to the study of mood disorders. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. 35, S121–S131 (2013).
Frey, B. N. et al. Effects of lithium and valproate on amphetamine-induced oxidative stress generation in an animal model of mania. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 31, 326–332 (2006).
Frey, B. N. et al. Increased oxidative stress after repeated amphetamine exposure: possible relevance as a model of mania. Bipolar Disord. 8, 275–280 (2006).
Nestler, E. J. & Hyman, S. E. Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1161–1169 (2010).
Choi, F. Y., Ahn, S., Wang, Y. T. & Phillips, A. G. Interference with AMPA receptor endocytosis: effects on behavioural and neurochemical correlates of amphetamine sensitization in male rats. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 39, 189–199 (2014).
Valvassori, S. S. et al. The role of neurotrophic factors in manic-, anxious- and depressive-like behaviors induced by amphetamine sensitization: Implications to the animal model of bipolar disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 245, 1106–1113 (2019).
Groos, D. et al. Chronic antipsychotic treatment targets GIRK current suppression, loss of long-term synaptic depression and behavioural sensitization in a mouse model of amphetamine psychosis. J. Psychopharmacol. 33, 74–85 (2018).
Issy, A. C., Dos-Santos-Pereira, M., Pedrazzi, J. F. C., Kubrusly, R. C. C. & Del-Bel, E. The role of striatum and prefrontal cortex in the prevention of amphetamine-induced schizophrenia-like effects mediated by nitric oxide compounds. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 86, 353–362 (2018).
Mishra, A., Mishra, A. K. & Jha, S. Effect of traditional medicine brahmi vati and bacoside A-rich fraction of Bacopa monnieri on acute pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures, amphetamine-induced model of schizophrenia, and scopolamine-induced memory loss in laboratory animals. Epilepsy Behav. 80, 144–151 (2018).
Baldessarini R. J. Drug therapy of depression and anxiety disorders. In Brunton L. L., Lazo J. S., Parker K. L. (eds). Goodman and Gilman’s Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 11th edition. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, 2006, pp 429–459.
Cheniaux, E. The pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic and critical review of the methodological aspects of modern clinical trials. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. 33, 72–80 (2011).
Rosa, A. R., Kapczinski, F., Oliva, R., Stein, A. & Barros, H. M. T. Monitoring the compliance to lithium treatment. Rev. Psiq. Clin. 33, 249–261 (2006).
Whelton, A. et al. Cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors and cardiorenal function: a randomized, controlled trial of celecoxib and rofecoxib in older hypertensive osteoarthritis patients. Am. J. Ther. 8, 85–95 (2001).
Nery, F. G. et al. Celecoxib as an adjunct in the treatment of depressive or mixed episodes of bipolar disorder: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 23, 87–94 (2008).
Arabzadeh, S. et al. Celecoxib adjunctive therapy for acute bipolar mania: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Bipolar Disord. 17, 606–614 (2015).
Modabbernia, A., Taslimi, S., Brietzke, E. & Ashrafi, M. Cytokine alterations in bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of 30 studies. Biol. Psychiatry 74, 15–25 (2013).
Barbosa, I. G., Machado-Vieira, R., Soares, J. C. & Teixeira, A. L. The immunology of bipolar disorder. Neuroimmunomodulation 21, 117–122 (2014).
Kaizaki et al. Celecoxib reduces brain dopaminergic neuronal dysfunction and improves sensorimotor behavioral performance in neonatal rats exposed to systemic lipopolysaccharide. J. Neuroinflammation 10, 45 (2013).
Broadhurst P. L. Experiments in psychogenetics: Application of biometrical genetics to the inheritance of behavior. In Eisenk H. J. (ed). Experiments in Personality: Psychogenetics and psychopharmacology. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, 1960, pp 31–71.
Levine, R. L., Williams, J. A., Stadtman, E. R. & Shacter, E. Carbonyl assays for determination of oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol. 233, 346–357 (1994).
Esterbauer, H. & Cheeseman, K. H. Determination of aldehydic lipid peroxidation products: malonaldehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal. Methods Enzymol. 186, 407–421 (1990).
Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 105, 121–126 (1984).
Wendel, A. Glutathione peroxidase. Methods Enzymol. 77, 325–333 (1981).
Valvassori, S. S. et al. Effects of mood stabilizers on mitochondrial respiratory chain activity in brain of rats treated with d-amphetamine. J. Psychiatr. Res. 44, 903–909 (2010).
Valvassori, S. S. et al. Lithium modulates the production of peripheral and cerebral cytokines in an animal model of mania induced by dextroamphetamine. Bipolar Disord. 17, 507–517 (2015).
Valvassori S. S. et al. Coadministration of lithium and celecoxib attenuates the behavioral alterations and inflammatory processes induced by amphetamine in an animal model of mania. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 183, 56–63 (2019).
Borre, Y. et al. Celecoxib delays cognitive decline in an animal model of neurodegeneration. Behav. Brain Res. 234, 285–291 (2012).
Ross, B. M. et al. Cyclooxygenase inhibitor modulation of dopamine-related behaviours. Eur. J. Pharm. 450, 141–151 (2002).
Mizuno, M. et al. A cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor ameliorates behavioral impairments induced by striatal administration of epidermal growth factor. J. Neurosci. 27, 10116–10127 (2007).
Sánchez-Pernaute et al. Selective COX-2 inhibition prevents progressive dopamine neuron degeneration in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuroinflammation 1, 6 (2004).
LaVoie, M. J. & Hastings, T. G. Dopamine quinone formation and protein modification associated with the striatal neurotoxicity of methamphetamine: Evidence against a role for extracellular dopamine. J. Neurosci. 19, 1484–1491 (1999).
Thomas, D. M., Francescutti-Verbeem, D. M. & Kuhn, D. M. Methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity and microglial activation are not mediated by fractalkine receptor signaling. J. Neurochem. 106, 696–705 (2008).
Rapaport, M. H., Guylai, L. & Whybrow, P. Immune parameters in rapid cycling bipolar patients before and after lithium treatment. J. Psychiatr. Res. 33, 335–340 (1999).
Yamamoto, B. K., Moszczynska, A. & Gudelsky, G. A. Amphetamine toxicities: classical and emerging mechanisms. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1187, 101–121 (2010).
Wang, H. M. et al. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3β by lithium chloride suppresses 6-hydroxydopamine-induced inflammatory response in primary cultured astrocytes. Neurochem. Int. 63, 345–353 (2013).
ELnahas, E. M., Zeid, M. S., Kawy, H. S., Hendawy, N. & Baher, W. Celecoxib attenuates depressive-like behavior associated with immunological liver injury in C57BL/6 mice through TNF-α and NF-κb dependent mechanisms. Life Sci. 163, 23–37 (2016).
Feier, G. et al. Lithium and valproate modulate energy metabolism in an animal model of mania induced by methamphetamine. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 103, 589–596 (2013).
Andreazza, A. C. et al. Effects of mood stabilizers on DNA damage in an animal model of mania. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 33, 516–524 (2008).
Cechinel-Recco, K. et al. Lithium and tamoxifen modulate cellular plasticity cascades in animal model of mania. J. Psychopharmacol. 26, 1594–1604 (2012).
Betteridge, D. J. What is oxidative stress? Metabolism 49(2 Suppl 1), 3–8 (2000).
Osman, E. Y. Effects of celecoxib or omega-3 fatty acids alone and in combination with risperidone on the behavior and brain biochemistry in amphetamine-induced model of schizophrenia. Pharm. Bioprocess 4, 113–125 (2016).
Kronfol, Z. & Remick, D. G. Cytokines and the brain: Implications for clinical psychiatry. Am. J. Psychiatry 157, 683–694 (2000).
Venugopal, J. & Prakash, R. Protective effect of COX inhibitors on lipopolysaccharide-induced sickness behaviour or neuroinflammation and oxidative stress on male Wistar rats. Int J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 7, 240–245 (2015).
Kuhar, M., Imran, S. & Singh, N. Celecoxib enhances the chemotherapeutic response of cisplatin and TNF-α in SiHa cells through reactive oxygen species-mediated mitochondrial pathway. Int J. Biomed. Sci. 3, 176–184 (2007).
da-Rosa, D. D. et al. Differences between dextroamphetamine and methamphetamine: behavioral changes and oxidative damage in brain of Wistar rats. J. Neural. Transm. (Vienna) 119, 31–38 (2012).
Callaly, E. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder: effects of pharmacotherapy. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 15, 355–365 (2015).
Dell’Osso, L., Del Grande, C., Gesi, C., Carmassi, C. & Musetti, L. A new look at an old drug: neuroprotective effects and therapeutic potentials of lithium salts. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 12, 1687–1703 (2016).
Macêdo, D. S. et al. Effects of lithium on oxidative stress and behavioral alterations induced by lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: relevance as an animal model of mania. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 43, 230–237 (2013).
Andreazza, A. C. et al. Serum S100B and antioxidant enzymes in bipolar patients. J. Psychiatr. Res. 41, 523–529 (2007).
Bastos-Pereira, A. L. et al. Celecoxib prevents tumor growth in an animal model by a COX-2 independent mechanism. Cancer Chemother. Pharm. 65, 267–276 (2010).
Phelan, K. M., Mosholder, A. D. & Lu, S. Lithium interaction with the cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors rofecoxib and celecoxib and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J. Clin. Psychiatry 64, 1328–1334 (2003).
Rätz Bravo, A. E., Egger, S. S., Crespo, S., Probst, W. L. & Krähenbühl, S. Lithium intoxication as a result of an interaction with rofecoxib. Ann. Pharmacother. 38, 1189–1193 (2004).
Rosenblat, J. D., Cha, D. S., Mansur, R. B. & McIntyre, R. S. Inflamed moods: a review of the interactions between inflammation and mood disorders. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 53, 23–34 (2014).
Data-Franco, J. et al. Beyond the therapeutic shackles of the monoamines: New mechanisms in bipolar disorder biology. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 72, 73–86 (2017).
Teixeira, A. L., Salem, H., Frey, B. N., Barbosa, I. G. & Machado-Vieira, R. Update on bipolar disorder biomarker candidates. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 16, 1209–1220 (2016).
Mousavi, S. Y. et al. A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial on effectiveness and safety of celecoxib adjunctive therapy in adolescents with acute bipolar mania. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 27, 494–500 (2017).
Goldstein, B. I., Kemp, D. E., Soczynska, J. K. & McIntyre, R. S. Inflammation and the phenomenology, pathophysiology, comorbidity, and treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic review of the literature. J. Clin. Psychiatry 70, 1078–1090 (2009).
Ayorech, Z., Tracy, D. K., Baumeister, D. & Giaroli, G. Taking the fuel out of the fire: evidence for the use of anti-inflammatory agents in the treatment of bipolar disorders. J. Affect. Disord. 174, 467–478 (2015).
Johansson, D., Falk, A., Marcus, M. M. & Svensson, T. H. Celecoxib enhances the effect of reboxetine and fluoxetine on cortical noradrenaline and serotonin output in the rat. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 39, 143–148 (2012).
Acknowledgements
The Translational Psychiatry Program (USA) is funded by the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth). The Center of Excellence on Mood Disorders (USA) is funded by the Pat Rutherford Jr. Chair in Psychiatry, John S. Dunn Foundation and Anne and Don Fizer Foundation Endowment for Depression Research. Translational Psychiatry Laboratory (Brazil) is one of the centers of the National Institute for Molecular Medicine (INCT-MM) and one of the members of the Center of Excellence in Applied Neurosciences of Santa Catarina (NENASC). Its research is supported by grants from CNPq, FAPESC, Instituto Cérebro e Mente and UNESC. JQ is a 1 A CNPq Research Fellow and SSV is a 1D CNPq Research Fellow. RBV is a holder of a CAPES studentship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
JQ has the following disclosures: I. Clinical Research Support: Janssen Pharmaceutical (Clinical Trial), Allergan (Clinical Trial) II. Advisory Boards, Speaker Bureaus, Expert Witness, or Consultant Daiichi Sankyo (Speaker Bureau) III. Patent, Equity, or Royalty Instituto de Neurociencias Dr. Joao Quevedo (Stockholder) IV. Other Artmed Editora (Copyright), Artmed Panamericana (Copyright).
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Valvassori, S.S., Tonin, P.T., Dal-Pont, G.C. et al. Coadministration of lithium and celecoxib reverses manic-like behavior and decreases oxidative stress in a dopaminergic model of mania induced in rats. Transl Psychiatry 9, 297 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0637-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0637-9