Abstract
Urine drug testing (UDT) is a tool for monitoring drug use, including oxycodone. While variation in cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes is known to alter oxycodone metabolism, its impact on UDT results of oxycodone and its metabolites has not been well-studied. Here, multivariate analysis was performed on retrospective UDT results of 90,379 specimens collected from 14,684 genotyped patients prescribed oxycodone. Genetic variation in CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 had a significant impact on oxymorphone/oxycodone ratios, with a 6.9-fold difference between CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs; p < 10−300) and a 1.6-fold difference between CYP2C19 UMs and PMs (p = 1.50 × 10−4). CYP2D6 variation also significantly impacted noroxycodone/oxycodone ratios (p = 6.95 × 10−38). Oxycodone-positive specimens from CYP2D6 PMs were ~5-fold more likely to be oxymorphone-negative compared to normal metabolizers. These findings indicate that multivariate analysis of UDT data may be used to reveal the real-world impact of genetic and non-genetic factors on drug metabolism.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Jarvis M, Williams J, Hurford M, Lindsay D, Lincoln P, Giles L, et al. Appropriate use of drug testing in clinical addiction medicine. J Addict Med. 2017;11:163–173.
US Drug Enforcement Administration, Diversion Control Division, Drug & Chemical Evaluation Section. Oxycodone. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/drug_chem_info/oxycodone/oxycodone.pdf. Revised March 2020. Accessed 12 Nov 2020.
Kinnunen M, Piirainen P, Kokki H, Lammi P, Kokki M. Updated clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019;58:705–25.
Huddart R, Clarke M, Altman RB, Klein TE. PharmGKB summary: oxycodone pathway, pharmacokinetics. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2018;28:230–7.
Elder NM, Atayee RS, Best BM, Ma JD. Observations of urinary oxycodone and metabolite distributions in pain patients. J Anal Toxicol. 2014;38:129–34.
Lalovic B, Kharasch E, Hoffer C, Risler L, Liu-Chen LY, Shen DD. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral oxycodone in healthy human subjects: role of circulating active metabolites. Clin Pharm Ther. 2006;79:461–79.
Moy KV, Ma JD, Morello CM, Atayee RS, Best BM. Monitoring oxycodone use in patients with chronic pain: analysis of oxycodone and metabolite excretion in saliva and urine. J Opioid Manag. 2014;10:47–56.
Yee DA, Best BM, Atayee RS, Pesce AJ. Observations on the urine metabolic ratio of oxymorphone to oxycodone in pain patients. J Anal Toxicol. 2012;36:232–8.
Cone EJ, Heltsley R, Black DL, Mitchell JM, Lodico CP, Flegel RR. Prescription opioids. I. Metabolism and excretion patterns of oxycodone in urine following controlled single dose administration. J Anal Toxicol. 2013;37:255–64.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Clinical drug testing in primary care. Technical Assistance Publication (TAP) 32. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 12-4668. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration: Rockville, MD, USA, 2012.
Flockhart DA. Drug Interactions: Cytochrome P450 Drug Interaction Table. Indiana University School of Medicine (2007). https://drug-interactions.medicine.iu.edu/MainTable.aspx. Accessed 12 Nov 2020.
Desta Z, Gammal RS, Gong L, Whirl-Carrillo M, Gaur AH, Sukasem C, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2B6 and efavirenz-containing antiretroviral therapy. Clin Pharm Ther. 2019;106:726–33.
Pratt VM, Cavallari LH, Del Tredici AL, Hachad H, Ji Y, Moyer AM, et al. Recommendations for clinical CYP2C9 genotyping allele selection: a joint recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and College of American Pathologists. J Mol Diagn. 2019;21:746–55.
Pratt VM, Del Tredici AL, Hachad H, Ji Y, Kalman LV, Scott SA, et al. Recommendations for clinical CYP2C19 genotyping allele selection: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2018;20:269–76.
Caudle KE, Rettie AE, Whirl-Carrillo M, Smith LH, Mintzer S, Lee MT, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for CYP2C9 and HLA-B genotypes and phenytoin dosing. Clin Pharm Ther. 2014;96:542–8.
Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Stein CM, Hulot JS, Mega JL, Roden DM, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2013 update. Clin Pharm Ther. 2013;94:317–23.
Del Tredici AL, Malhotra A, Dedek M, Espin F, Roach D, Zhu GD, et al. Frequency of CYP2D6 alleles including structural variants in the United States. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:305.
PharmGKB. Frequencies of CYP2C9 alleles in biogeographical groups. https://api.pharmgkb.org/v1/download/file/attachment/CYP2C9_frequency_table.xlsx. Accessed 12 Nov 2020.
Birdwell KA, Decker B, Barbarino JM, Peterson JF, Stein CM, Sadee W, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for CYP3A5 genotype and tacrolimus dosing. Clin Pharm Ther. 2015;98:19–24.
Crews KR, Monte AA, Huddart R, Caudle KE, Kharasch ED, Gaedigk A, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guideline for CYP2D6, OPRM1, and COMT genotypes and select opioid therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021.
Sanchez Spitman AB, Moes D, Gelderblom H, Dezentje VO, Swen JJ, Guchelaar HJ. Effect of CYP3A4*22, CYP3A5*3, and CYP3A combined genotypes on tamoxifen metabolism. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73:1589–98.
Zanger UM, Klein K. Pharmacogenetics of cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6): advances on polymorphisms, mechanisms, and clinical relevance. Front Genet. 2013;4:24.
Andreassen TN, Eftedal I, Klepstad P, Davies A, Bjordal K, Lundstrom S, et al. Do CYP2D6 genotypes reflect oxycodone requirements for cancer patients treated for cancer pain? A cross-sectional multicentre study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68:55–64.
Liukas A, Kuusniemi K, Aantaa R, Virolainen P, Neuvonen M, Neuvonen PJ, et al. Plasma concentrations of oral oxycodone are greatly increased in the elderly. Clin Pharm Ther. 2008;84:462–7.
Naito T, Takashina Y, Yamamoto K, Tashiro M, Ohnishi K, Kagawa Y, et al. CYP3A5*3 affects plasma disposition of noroxycodone and dose escalation in cancer patients receiving oxycodone. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;51:1529–38.
Samer CF, Daali Y, Wagner M, Hopfgartner G, Eap CB, Rebsamen MC, et al. The effects of CYP2D6 and CYP3A activities on the pharmacokinetics of immediate release oxycodone. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160:907–18.
Stamer UM, Zhang L, Book M, Lehmann LE, Stuber F, Musshoff F. CYP2D6 genotype dependent oxycodone metabolism in postoperative patients. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e60239.
Zwisler ST, Enggaard TP, Noehr-Jensen L, Pedersen RS, Mikkelsen S, Nielsen F, et al. The hypoalgesic effect of oxycodone in human experimental pain models in relation to the CYP2D6 oxidation polymorphism. Basic Clin Pharm Toxicol. 2009;104:335–44.
Lalovic B, Phillips B, Risler LL, Howald W, Shen DD. Quantitative contribution of CYP2D6 and CYP3A to oxycodone metabolism in human liver and intestinal microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32:447–54.
Gronlund J, Saari TI, Hagelberg NM, Neuvonen PJ, Laine K, Olkkola KT. Effect of inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes 2D6 and 3A4 on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous oxycodone: a randomized, three-phase, crossover, placebo-controlled study. Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31:143–53.
Gronlund J, Saari TI, Hagelberg NM, Neuvonen PJ, Olkkola KT, Laine K. Exposure to oral oxycodone is increased by concomitant inhibition of CYP2D6 and 3A4 pathways, but not by inhibition of CYP2D6 alone. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;70:78–87.
Heiskanen T, Olkkola KT, Kalso E. Effects of blocking CYP2D6 on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone. Clin Pharm Ther. 1998;64:603–11.
Lemberg KK, Heiskanen TE, Neuvonen M, Kontinen VK, Neuvonen PJ, Dahl ML, et al. Does co-administration of paroxetine change oxycodone analgesia: an interaction study in chronic pain patients. Scand J Pain. 2010;1:24–33.
Klein K, Zanger UM. Pharmacogenomics of cytochrome P450 3A4: recent progress toward the “missing heritability” problem. Front Genet. 2013;4:12.
Jannetto PJ, Bratanow NC, Clark WA, Hamill-Ruth RJ, Hammett-Stabler CA, Huestis MA, et al. Executive summary: American Association of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guideline—Using clinical laboratory tests to monitor drug therapy in pain management patients. J Appl Lab Med. 2018;2:489–526.
Raouf M, Bettinger JJ, Fudin J. A practical guide to urine drug monitoring. Fed Pract. 2018;35:38–44.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Karthika Balasubramanian for critical review of the study design and results.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GZ, PW and AD conceptualized and designed the study including methodology. AH provided supervision and resources. GZ and PW performed data analysis. All authors contributed to interpretation of the results. GZ and AD took the lead on writing the paper. PW, LL, BA, ED and EC made substantial edits to the paper. All authors reviewed and approved the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
All authors except EC were employed by Millennium Health on a full-time basis at the time this study was completed. EC declares no competing financial interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, Gd., Whitley, P., LaRue, L. et al. Impact of genetic variation in CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 on oxycodone and its metabolites in a large database of clinical urine drug tests. Pharmacogenomics J 22, 25–32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-021-00253-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-021-00253-5