Abstract
Tacrolimus is characterized by a highly variable pharmacokinetics (PK) and a small therapeutic window. It is metabolized specifically by the CYP3A isoenzymes. This study aimed to determine, in kidney transplant patients, the influence of different genotypic clusters involving these SNPs CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A4*22, and CYP3A5*3 on Tacrolimus bioavailability during the first (PTP1) and the second (PTP2) posttransplant phase (PT). We included kidney transplant patients who received Tacrolimus and underwent drug monitoring by C0 monitoring. CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genotyping were performed using PCR–RFLP. We classified the patients into four groups: Slow, Intermediate, rapid, and ultra-rapid metabolizers. We included 80 patients. The Tacrolimus dose-normalized C0 (C0/D ratio) was significantly decreased in intermediate, rapid, and ultra-rapid comparing with slow metabolisers. During PTP1 only CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*22 polymorphisms correlate significantly with C0/D ratio. Regardless of the PT phase and during the late one, only the CYP3A4 polymorphisms correlate significantly with the C0/D ratio. We identified that these SNPs are all associated independently with Tacrolimus exposure in different PT phases. Moreover, we are the first to define a genotypic cluster including the three CYP3A SNPs.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
07 September 2020
The original version of this Article omitted the word “of” in the title and should have read “Influence of CYP3A polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients”. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
09 September 2020
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
References
Thervet E, Loriot MA, Barbier S, Buchler M, Ficheux M, Choukroun G, et al. Optimization of initial tacrolimus dose using pharmacogenetic testing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2010.17.
Santoro A, Struchiner C, Felipe C, Tedesco-Silva H, Medina-Pestana J, Suarez-Kurtz G. CYP3A5 Genotype, but not CYP3A4*1b, CYP3A4*22, or Hematocrit, Predicts Tacrolimus Dose Requirements in Brazilian Renal Transplant Patients. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2013.68.
Kuypers D, De Loor H, Naesens M, Coopmans T, De Jonge H. Combined effects of CYP3A5*1, POR*28, and CYP3A4*22 single nucleotide polymorphisms on early concentration-controlled tacrolimus exposure in de-novo renal recipients. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0000000000000095.
Moes DJAR, Swen JJ, Den Hartigh J, Van Der Straaten T, Homan Van Der Heide JJ, Sanders JS, et al. Effect of CYP3A4*22, CYP3A5*3, and CYP3A combined genotypes on cyclosporine, everolimus, and tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in renal transplantation. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/psp.2013.78.
De Jonge H, De Loor H, Verbeke K, Vanrenterghem Y, Kuypers DR. In vivo CYP3A4 activity, CYP3A5 genotype, and hematocrit predict tacrolimus dose requirements and clearance in renal transplant patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2012.109.
Keshava C, Mccanlies EC, Weston A. HUMAN GENOME EPIDEMIOLOGY (HuGE) REVIEW CYP3A4 polymorphisms-potential risk factors for breast and prostate cancer: a huge review cytochrome P-450 genes constitute a superfamily coding for different isozymes that account for phase I drug metabo. 2004. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Omim/.
Garsa AA, McLeod HL, Marsh S. CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genotyping by pyrosequencing. BMC Med Genet. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-6-19.
Elens L, Bouamar R, Hesselink DA, Haufroid V, Van Gelder T, Van Schaik RHN. The new CYP3A4 intron 6 C>T polymorphism (CYP3A4*22) is associated with an increased risk of delayed graft function and worse renal function in cyclosporine-treated kidney transplant patients. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0b013e328351f3c1.
Elens L, Bouamar R, Hesselink DA, Haufroid V, Van Der Heiden IP, Van Gelder T, et al. A new functional CYP3A4 intron 6 polymorphism significantly affects tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients. Clin Chem. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.165613.
Aouam K, Kolsi A, Kerkeni E, Ben Fredj N, Chaabane A, Monastiri K, et al. Influence of combined CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 single-nucleotide polymorphisms on tacrolimus exposure in kidney transplant recipients: a study according to the post-transplant phase. Pharmacogenomics. 2015. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.15.138.
Li Y, Hu X, Cai B, Chen J, Bai Y, Tang J, et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of MDR1 C3435 polymorphism on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients. Transpl Immunol. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trim.2012.03.006.
Kurzawski M, Da̧browska J, Dziewanowski K, Domański L, Peruzyńska M, Droździk M. CYP3A5 and CYP3A4, but not ABCB1 polymorphisms affect tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough concentrations in kidney transplant recipients. Pharmacogenomics. 2014;15:179–88.
Lloberas N, Elens L, Llaudó I, Padullés A, Van Gelder T, Hesselink DA, et al. The combination of CYP3A4∗22 and CYP3A5∗3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms determines tacrolimus dose requirement after kidney transplantation. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0000000000000296.
Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/16.3.1215.
Van Der Weide K, Van Der Weide J. The influence of the CYP3A4*22 polymorphism on serum concentration of quetiapine in psychiatric patients. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000000070.
Elens L, Van Gelder T, Hesselink DA, Haufroid V, Van Schaik RHN. CYP3A4*22: promising newly identified CYP3A4 variant allele for personalizing pharmacotherapy. Pharmacogenomics. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.12.187.
Abdel-Kahaar E, Winter S, Tremmel R, Schaeffeler E, Olbricht CJ, Wieland E, et al. The Impact of CYP3A4*22 on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and outcome in clinical practice at a single kidney transplant center. Front Genet. 2019;10:871.
Drögemöller B, Plummer M, Korkie L, Agenbag G, Dunaiski A, Niehaus D, et al. Characterization of the genetic variation present in CYP3A4 in three South African populations. Front Genet. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00017.
Kuypers DRJ, De Jonge H, Naesens M, Lerut E, Verbeke K, Vanrenterghem. YCYP3A5 and CYP3A4 but not MDR1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms determine long-term tacrolimus disposition and drug-related nephrotoxicity in renal recipients. Clin Pharmacol. Ther. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.clpt.6100216.
Hesselink DA, Van Schaik RHN, Van Der Heiden IP, Van Der Werf M, Smak Gregoor PJH, Lindemans J, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of the CΥP3A4, CΥP3A5, and MDR-1 genes and pharmacokinetics of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00168-1.
Shi W-L, Tang H-L, Zhai S-D. Effects of the CYP3A4*1B genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant recipients: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127995.
Elens L, Hesselink DA, Bouamar R, Budde K, De Fijter JW, De Meyer M, et al. Impact of POR*28 on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and cyclosporine A in renal transplant patients. Ther Drug Monit. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0b013e31829da6dd.
Okubo M, Murayama N, Shimizu M, Shimada T, Guengerich FP, Yamazaki H. CYP3A4 intron 6 C>T polymorphism (CYP3A4*22) is associated with reduced CYP3A4 protein level and function in human liver microsomes. J Toxicol Sci. 2013;38:349–54.
Ganoci L, Božina T, Mirošević Skvrce N, Lovrić M, Mas P, Božina N. Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 enzymes: CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 in the Croatian population. Drug Metab Pers Ther. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/dmpt-2016-0024.
1000 Genomes database. The 1000 Genomes database [Internet] http://www1000genomesorg/.
Gijsen VM, Van Schaik RH, Elens L, Soldin OP, Soldin SJ, Koren G, et al. CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A combined genotypes both correlate with tacrolimus disposition in pediatric heart transplant recipients. Pharmacogenomics. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.13.80.
Elens L, Becker ML, Haufroid V, Hofman A, Visser LE, Uitterlinden AG. Stricker BCBc, Van Schaik RHN. Novel CYP3A4 intron 6 single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with simvastatin-mediated cholesterol reduction in the Rotterdam Study. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2011;21:861–6.
Elens L, van Schaik RH, Panin N, de Meyer M, Wallemacq P, Lison D, et al. Effect of a new functional CYP3A4 polymorphism on calcineurin inhibitors’ dose requirements and trough blood levels in stable renal transplant patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2011;12:1383–96.
Hu R, Barratt DT, Coller JK, Sallustio BC, Somogyi AA. CYP3A5*3 and ABCB1 61A>G significantly influence dose-adjusted trough blood tacrolimus concentrations in the first three months post-kidney transplantation. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13016.
Yousef AM, Qosa H, Bulatova NR, Abuhaliema A, Almadhoun H, Khayyat G, et al. Effects of genetic polymorphism in CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes on tacrolimus dose among kidney transplant recipients. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2016;10:156–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hannachi, I., Chadli, Z., Kerkeni, E. et al. Influence of CYP3A polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients. Pharmacogenomics J 21, 69–77 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-020-00179-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-020-00179-4