Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate discontinuation for renal outcomes: any room for treatment personalization?

Abstract

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a very effective antiviral drug that has been associated with tubular dysfunction. The aim of this study was to analyze the demographic, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacogenetic variables associated with TDF discontinuation for renal outcomes in stable HIV-positive patients using multivariable analyses. Three hundred and four patients were included (73% male, with median age and eCrCl of 45.3 years and 90.9 mL/min, respectively). After a median follow-up of 28.3 months, 27 patients discontinued TDF for renal adverse events [persistent urinary abnormalities (n = 21) or eCrCl < 60 mL/min (n = 6)] providing an incidence of 3.77 events per 100 patient-year. The probability of TDF discontinuation was higher with several features (male gender, older age, not Caucasians ancestry, absence of intravenous drug abuse, protease inhibitors, previous indinavir, HCV-positivity, lower CD4 cell count, detectable HIV-RNA, lower eCrCl, spot-urine proteinuria) and higher tenofovir concentrations but not genetic variants. Tenofovir plasma concentrations were prognostic of TDF discontinuation for renal adverse events suggesting that dose-adjustment may be warranted for long-term safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents [Internet] [cited 20 Apr 2017]. http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/lvguidelines/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf.

  2. Ustianowski A, Arends JE. Tenofovir: what we have learnt after 7.5 million person-years of use. Infect Dis Ther. 2015;4:145–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang H, Lu X, Yang X, Xu N. The efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in antiretroviral regimens for HIV-1 therapy: meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e5146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations 2016 update [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Apr 20]. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/246200/1/9789241511124-eng.pdf?ua=1

  5. Monteagudo-Chu MO, Chang MH, Fung HB, Bräu N. Renal toxicity of long-term therapy with tenofovir in HIV-infected patients. J Pharm Pract. 2012;25:552–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scherzer R, Estrella M, Li Y, Choi AI, Deeks SG, Grunfeld C, et al. Association of tenofovir exposure with kidney disease risk in HIV infection. AIDS Lond Engl. 2012;26:867–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jotwani V, Scherzer R, Estrella MM, Jacobson LP, Witt MD, Palella F, et al. Brief report: cumulative tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure is associated with biomarkers of tubular injury and fibrosis in HIV-infected men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999;73:177–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tourret J, Deray G, Isnard-Bagnis C. Tenofovir effect on the kidneys of HIV-infected patients: a double-edged sword? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24:1519–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall AM, Edwards SG, Lapsley M, Connolly JO, Chetty K, O’Farrell S, et al. Subclinical tubular injury in HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy: a cross-sectional analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54:1034–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Calcagno A, Cusato J, Marinaro L, Simiele M, Lucchiari M, Alcantarini C, et al. Tenofovir clearance is reduced in HIV-positive patients with subclinical tubular impairment. AIDS Lond Engl. 2016;30:915–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Herlitz LC, Mohan S, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, D’Agati VD, Markowitz GS. Tenofovir nephrotoxicity: acute tubular necrosis with distinctive clinical, pathological, and mitochondrial abnormalities. Kidney Int. 2010;78:1171–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goicoechea M, Liu S, Best B, Sun S, Jain S, Kemper C, et al. Greater tenofovir-associated renal function decline with protease inhibitor-based versus nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-based therapy. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:102–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Calcagno A, Gonzalez de Requena D, Simiele M, D’Avolio A, Tettoni MC, Salassa B, et al. Tenofovir plasma concentrations according to companion drugs: a cross-sectional study of HIV-positive patients with normal renal function. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:1840–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moss DM, Neary M, Owen A. The role of drug transporters in the kidney: lessons from tenofovir. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pushpakom SP, Liptrott NJ, Rodríguez-Nóvoa S, Labarga P, Soriano V, Albalater M, et al. Genetic variants of ABCC10, a novel tenofovir transporter, are associated with kidney tubular dysfunction. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:145–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Calcagno A, Cusato J, Marinaro L, Trentini L, Alcantarini C, Mussa M, et al. Clinical pharmacology of tenofovir clearance: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacogenetic study on plasma and urines. Pharmacogenomics J. 2015;16:514–518.

  17. Mocroft A, Lundgren JD, Ross M, Law M, Reiss P, Kirk O, et al. Development and validation of a risk score for chronic kidney disease in HIV infection using prospective cohort data from the D:A:D study. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45:1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuk D, Varadhan R. Model selection in competing risks regression. Stat Med. 2013;32:3077–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolbers M, Blanche P, Koller MT, Witteman JCM, Gerds TA. Concordance for prognostic models with competing risks. Biostat Oxf Engl. 2014;15:526–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mocroft A, Lundgren JD, Ross M, Fux CA, Reiss P, Moranne O, et al. Cumulative and current exposure to potentially nephrotoxic antiretrovirals and development of chronic kidney disease in HIV-positive individuals with a normal baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate: a prospective international cohort study. Lancet Hiv. 2016;3:e23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ezinga M, Wetzels JFM, Bosch MEW, van der Ven AJAM, Burger DM. Long-term treatment with tenofovir: prevalence of kidney tubular dysfunction and its association with tenofovir plasma concentration. Antivir Ther. 2014;19:765–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lubomirov R, Colombo S, di Iulio J, Ledergerber B, Martinez R, Cavassini M, et al. Association of pharmacogenetic markers with premature discontinuation of first-line anti-HIV therapy: an observational cohort study. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:246–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rungtivasuwan K, Avihingsanon A, Thammajaruk N, Mitruk S, Burger DM, Ruxrungtham K, et al. Influence of ABCC2 and ABCC4 polymorphisms on tenofovir plasma concentrations in Thai HIV-infected patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:3240–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Baxi SM, Greenblatt RM, Bacchetti P, Scherzer R, Minkoff H, Huang Y, et al. Common clinical conditions—age, low BMI, ritonavir use, mild renal impairment —affect tenofovir pharmacokinetics in a large cohort of HIV-infected women. AIDS Lond Engl. 2014;28:59–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Baxi SM, Scherzer R, Greenblatt RM, Minkoff H, Sharma A, Cohen M, et al. Higher tenofovir exposure is associated with longitudinal declines in kidney function in women living with HIV. AIDS Lond Engl. 2016;30:609–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Costarelli S, Cozzi-Lepri A, Lapadula G, Bonora S, Madeddu G, Maggiolo F, et al. Long-term durability of tenofovir-based antiretroviral therapy in relation to the co-Administration of other drug classes in routine clinical practice. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0160761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gagneux-Brunon A, Botelho-Nevers E, Frésard A, Lucht F. Preventing long-term tenofovir renal toxicity by pharmacokinetic assessment. AIDS Lond Engl. 2016;30:665–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gervasoni C, Minisci D, Baldelli S, Mazzali C, Giacomelli A, Milazzo L, et al. Effect of cobicistat on tenofovir plasma concentration: a cross-sectional study. In: Abstract of the conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections. Seattle, WA, USA, 2017.

  31. Cattaneo D, Minisci D, Baldelli S, Mazzali C, Giacomelli A, Milazzo L, et al. Effect of cobicistat on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF): what is true for TAF may also be true for TDF. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999;77:86–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by internal funding. The previous study (the cross-sectional study) that originated this cohort was partially supported by a Gilead fellowship grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Calcagno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AC has received honoraria from Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Viiv and he is currently receiving research grants from BMS, Gilead, and Viiv. GDP and SB have received honoraria from Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, and Viiv. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calcagno, A., Fiumanò, M., Zugna, D. et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate discontinuation for renal outcomes: any room for treatment personalization?. Pharmacogenomics J 19, 65–71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-018-0064-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-018-0064-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links