Ammonia oxidation, as the first step of nitrification, constitutes a critical process in the global nitrogen cycle. However, fundamental knowledge of its key enzyme, the copper-dependent ammonia monooxygenase, is lacking, in particular for the environmentally abundant ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA). Here the structure of the enzyme is investigated by blue-native gel electrophoresis and proteomics from native membrane complexes of two AOA. Besides the known AmoABC subunits and the earlier predicted AmoX, two new protein subunits, AmoY and AmoZ, were identified. They are unique to AOA, highly conserved and co-regulated, and their genes are linked to other AMO subunit genes in streamlined AOA genomes. Modeling and in-gel cross-link approaches support an overall protomer structure similar to the distantly related bacterial particulate methane monooxygenase but also reveals clear differences in extracellular domains of the enzyme. These data open avenues for further structure-function studies of this ecologically important nitrification complex.
Nitrification, the conversion of ammonium to nitrate, is a crucial step in the global nitrogen cycle solely performed by microorganisms. The process has attracted particular attention due to its agricultural and environmental relevance. The first and rate limiting  step of nitrification is the oxidation of ammonia via the integral membrane protein complex ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) [2, 3]. While ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) were first discovered over 125 years ago  and have been extensively studied, this biological process was also detected in the archaeal domain in the last 20 years [5,6,7]. Ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) have gained broad attention as they are widespread in nature and are more abundant than their bacterial counterparts in most terrestrial and marine environments, indicating important roles in nitrogen cycling [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Their central nitrogen and carbon metabolism, however, is distinct from that of AOB [15,16,17,18]. In particular, subunits of the AMO complex show only about 40% identity to those of bacteria  and archaeal proteins catalyzing the second step in ammonia oxidation, i.e. the conversion of hydroxylamine to nitrite, are still unknown [19,20,21]. These differences imply important functional differentiation in their environmental roles that have yet to be unraveled.
Due to the difficulty of growing nitrifying organisms and the inherent problems with isolating membrane proteins, no structural studies have been successfully carried out for any AMO complex, bacterial or archaeal. This holds true for most of the diverse enzymes of the CuMMO (copper-dependent membrane monooxygenase) protein family, with a few notable exceptions. Crystal structures [22,23,24,25,26] and cryo-EM structures [27, 28] of particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO) from five methanotrophs have consistently confirmed a three-polypeptide protomer (subunits-A, -B and -C) arranged in a trimer of α3β3γ3 configuration with at least two conserved metal sites in each protomer. Even so, the elucidation of the active site has remained ambiguous. It was first proposed to reside in the PmoB subunit of pMMO . More recently, a cryo-EM analysis supports the active site primarily being coordinated by PmoA , while differing amino acid conservation in Verrucomicrobia , a recent spectroscopic analysis , and mutagenesis of a hydrocarbon monooxygenase , suggest its localization in the PmoC subunit.
Although no AMO structure has been determined experimentally, homology modeling for the AMO of the bacterium Nitrosomonas europaea using pMMO as a template supported a homotrimeric structure as well as conservation of the CuB and CuC copper sites . The archaeal AMO complex is the most distantly related of all CuMMO proteins [34, 35] and very little is known so far about its structure or function. Based on comparative metagenomics alone, it has been suggested that an additional subunit might be present in the complex, termed AmoX [15, 36].
To gain insights into the overall architecture of the archaeal AMO complex, membrane protein fractions from the well characterized soil AOA, Nitrososphaera viennensis, were analyzed biochemically using native gel electrophoresis, mass spectrometry, and chemical cross-linking. Beside the three known AmoABC proteins, three additional potential subunits were identified and one of the six predicted AmoC proteins in N. viennensis was recognized as the primary homolog in the protein complex. In addition, the overall subunit composition of the AMO complex was confirmed in the distantly related thermophilic AOA Nitrosocaldus cavascurensis.
Materials and methods
Nitrososphaera viennensis was grown as a continuous culture in 2 L bioreactors (Eppendorf) filled with 1.5 L of freshwater medium (FWM) [37, 38] with modified trace element solution , 7.5 µM FeNaEDTA, 2 mM NH4Cl, and 1 mM pyruvate at 42 °C and pH 7.5. Carbonate was supplied by gassing the reactors with a 98% air 2% CO2 mixture. The applied dilution rates ranged from 0.035 to 0.07 h−1.
Nitrosocaldus cavascurensis was grown as a batch culture in the same reactors, volume, and medium as described for N. viennensis, but at 68 °C with 1 mM NH4Cl, 1 mM pyruvate, and pH 7.0. Carbonate was also supplied by gassing, but with a mixture of air/ N2/ CO2 to achieve a 10% O2 and 2% CO2 mixture. To increase the biomass, NH4Cl was added stepwise with syringes via a septum to increase the final NO2− concentration to approximately 2.5 mM before harvesting the cultures.
Harvested biomass was concentrated in three centrifugation steps. First with a continuous centrifuge (CEPA model LE) operating at maximum speed. Biomass from the continuous centrifuge was then suspended in 400 mL volumes and concentrated using a Sorvall Lynx 4000 with an F12–6 × 500 rotor for 30 min at 4 °C and 16,000 × g. Finally, biomass was resuspended in small volumes and aliquoted to 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and concentrated to a final pellet for 30 min at 4 °C and 16,000 × g using a bench-top centrifuge. Pellets were frozen at −70 °C until further analysis.
Sample and data processing
Detailed information for bioinformatic analysis, membrane protein extraction, BN-PAGE methods, Tricine-SDS-PAGE methods, mass spectrometry preparation, cross-linking, data analysis, and AlphaFold multimer predictions can be found in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Briefly, cells were lysed and membrane fractions were isolated using ultracentrifugation (Beckman Coulter Ultracentrifuge; SW 41 Ti Swinging-Bucket Rotor, kmax = 124; 200,000 × g) for 90 min at 4 °C using 13.2 mL thinwall polypropylene tubes with a level of deceleration set to 7. Membrane proteins were extracted using n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM; Invitrogen BN2005) and loaded on a 3–12% pre-cast BN-PAGE gel (Invitrogen BN1001). Selected bands were cut out and analyzed via mass spectrometry for protein identification. Procedures for protein extraction and running a BN-PAGE gel were based on previous studies [39, 40] and the NativePAGE Novex Bis-Tris Gel System manual from Life Technologies (MAN0000557). Study design and analysis for membrane extraction and BN-PAGE was guided by previous studies [41, 42] Cross-linking methods were based on protocols from Hevler et al. (2021) .
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE  partner repository with the dataset identifiers PXD035349, PXD034632, and PXD034475 for BN-PAGE of N. viennensis, BN-PAGE of N. cavascurensis, and cross-linked samples, respectively. Relevant scripts for analysis can be found in the GitHub repository https://github.com/hodgskiss/Archaeal_AMO.
Complexome analysis of native membrane complexes displays the AMO composition of Nitrososphaera viennensis
Nitrososphaera viennensis was grown in continuous culture for several weeks under optimal growth conditions in order to obtain enough biomass for biochemical analyses (Melcher et al. ). Between 800–2000 µg of membrane proteins were obtained from 450–550 mg of biomass per preparation, of which approximately 40–50 µg were loaded per lane on blue-native PAGE gels . After optimization of conditions, 22 bands were cut out and subjected to mass spectrometry (see Supplementary Materials and Methods; Fig. S1A). AMO subunits (AmoA, AmoB, and AmoC) were among the most abundant proteins (22% of iBAQ normalized intensity) detected overall in these membrane fractions. The relative intensity profiles of AmoA, AmoB, and AmoC showed three distinct peaks corresponding to bands 4, 7, and 12, with the most prominent peak occurring at band 7 (Fig. 1A). The subunits AmoA, AmoB, and AmoC made up 10%, 5%, and 14%, respectively, of the total protein found in band 7 based on iBAQ normalized intensities. AmoX was also present in band 7 representing 10%. The most intense signals for the AmoC subunit were represented by two of the six AmoC homologs, AmoC6 and AmoC4. These two homologs could not be distinguished based on the peptides identified in the BN-PAGE gel. In denaturing Tricine-SDS-PAGE of cutouts from band 7, all known components of the AMO complex were visualized and confirmed by proteomics (Fig. 2). In addition, this allowed for the identification of unique peptides of the AmoC6 subunit (see Supplementary Discussion).
To identify additional proteins that might be part of the archaeal AMO complex, a correlation analysis was conducted to find candidates with a similar migration pattern as all three primary AMO subunits AmoA, AmoB, and AmoC4/C6. Patterns of the 50% most abundant proteins were compared to each other using a Kendall correlation to determine the likelihood of dependence between various proteins with a focus on proteins correlated with known AMO subunits. Additional criteria were (i) their presence in fully sequenced AOA, and (ii) their absence in species that do not oxidize ammonia . The two proteins that initially met these criteria were the putative AMO subunit AmoX and a hypothetical protein, NVIE_004540 (Table 1). The migration patterns for these proteins can be seen in Fig. 1A. While this unbiased selection process produced additional AMO candidates, further analysis was needed to verify the presence of these newly identified and other potential subunits.
Linkage analysis in AOA genomes supports proposed and additional AMO subunits
Earlier analyses of known subunits within the soil strains, or the family Nitrososphaeraceae (as defined by the Genome Taxonomy Database ; used throughout), has shown a general lack of spatial clustering of all earlier known subunit genes. However, within the families Nitrosopumilaceae and Nitrosocaldaceae, the genes for the canonical AMO subunits, AmoABC, and the proposed subunit AmoX are syntenic [36, 48, 49]. To investigate co-localization of potential additional subunit genes, the syntenic status and conservation across AOA of the five genes upstream and downstream of the amo gene cluster in Nitrosocaldaceae and Nitrosopumilaceae were analyzed. Of these genes, 19 were conserved in AOA with five being found exclusively in AOA (Supplementary Dataset 2). The five genes of interest included two canonical amo genes (amoA and amoB) and the genes amoX, NVIE_004540, and NVIE_004550. The absence of amoC in the genes of interest is attributed to a truncated version existing within the genome of “Candidatus Nitrosopumilus koreensis AR1” (likely due to assembly issues) that precluded it from being identified as conserved in all AOA. The amoX gene was previously identified in metagenomic studies [15, 36] and NVIE_004540 was already a candidate identified from the BN-PAGE correlation analysis. The additional conserved protein, NVIE_004550, was newly identified and found to be located directly upstream of NVIE_004540, indicating potential co-transcription. The two new candidates encode for polypeptides of 9.6 kDa and 12.8 kDa respectively, and – like the candidate subunit AmoX - their predicted secondary structure is predominantly helical and their subcellular localization transmembrane. The two new candidate amo genes NVIE_004540 and NVIE_004550 have therefore been termed amoY and amoZ, respectively.
A closer analysis in Nitrosocaldaceae, the earliest diverging lineage in evolutionary reconstructions of AOA [46, 50], revealed that the genes for the three candidate subunits for AMO (AmoX, AmoY-homolog of NVIE_004540, and AmoZ-homolog of NVIE_004550) clustered spatially with the canonical subunits (AmoABC) and were syntenic in Nitrosocaldus cavascurensis and Ca. Nitrosocaldus islandicus. Spatial clustering of all six subunit genes is also found in recently obtained MAGs  within the genus Nitrosocaldus. In the case of the newly proposed genus Ca. Nitrosothermus , amo genes were split on multiple contigs and synteny could not be definitively determined (Fig. 3). Additionally, all six amo genes are inferred to have been newly acquired by the last common ancestor of AOA .
The emergence of Nitrosopumilaceae was accompanied by a separation of this genomic region into a primary cluster containing amoABCX and a secondary cluster containing amoYZ (Fig. 3). Within Nitrosotalea sp., these clusters are 11–12 genes apart, while the rest of Nitrosopumilaceae species have these clusters only 1–2 genes apart (with the exception of the sponge symbiont Ca. Cenarchaeum symbiosum). The emergence of the family Nitrososphaeraceae led to a scattering of all subunit genes across the genome with the exception of amoA and amoX, which are typically linked.
Although amoZ was identified in the genomic analysis, the protein AmoZ (NVIE_004550) was not correlated with AmoABC in the BN-PAGE gel of N. viennensis. When examining the relative abundance profile for AmoZ, the general pattern of AMO peptide peaks was followed. However, this remained undetected in the correlation analysis due to a high relative abundance peak occurring at the bottom of the gel peaking at the last band taken at approximately 66 kDa based on the BN-PAGE ladder (Fig. 1A). This is above the predicted mass of 12.8 kDa, but suggests that AmoZ could also be part of the AMO but a weaker association possibly lead to its dissociation from the complex and migration to the bottom of the gel.
BN-PAGE protein gel indicates same AMO composition in the thermophilic archaeon Nitrosocaldus cavascurensis
To test the composition of the AMO complex outside of the context of N. viennensis, the BN-PAGE approach was applied to membrane protein fractions of N. cavascurensis, a distantly related thermophilic AOA species of the Nitrosocaldaceae family  that was recently obtained in pure culture (Melcher et al. in preparation). Although a slightly different pattern of complexes was obtained (Fig. 1B) a correlation of the additional subunits was also observed with AmoA, AmoB, and AmoC in this thermophilic organism (Kendall correlation of proteins, as performed for N. viennensis). The three proteins AmoX, NCAV_0488 (AmoY), and NCAV_0486 (AmoZ) all had migration patterns within the gel that strongly correlated with AmoABC (Table 1). This analysis confirmed that the proposed subunits were translated in N. cavascurensis, and potentially had a physical connection within the AMO complex.
Chemical cross-linking supports physical interaction of additional subunits
To estimate the physical proximity of the proposed subunits to known subunits and other proteins within the BN-PAGE gel, in-gel cross-linking  was performed using the cross-linker disuccinimidyl sulfoxide (DSSO) on an additional BN-PAGE cut-out from band 7 (Fig. S1B). Mass spectrometry and cross-linking analysis showed multiple cross-links among AmoA, AmoB, AmoC, and AmoX as well as with the two newly proposed subunits AmoY and AmoZ (Fig. 4C). Many cross-links were also connected to NVIE_016740, a putative S-layer protein that likely represents a highly abundant surface layer protein as known from other archaea (SlaA) [52, 53]. As this protein presumably helps establish the pseudo-periplasm in AOA, it is not surprising to find it heavily cross-linked to membrane proteins.
AmoX also had individual cross-links to several other proteins (Supplementary Dataset 1). As only single connections were found, and these proteins did not appear in any other syntenic or correlative analyses, they were not taken to represent a structural role in the AMO complex. These cross-links can rather be attributed to the high abundance of those proteins in the cell membrane.
Expression patterns of AMO subunits in Nitrososphaera viennensis and Nitrosopumilus maritimus
Available transcriptomic studies of AOA were inspected to explore whether the expression patterns of the newly predicted subunits would corroborate their involvement in the AMO. A recent study on copper limitation in N. viennensis  confirmed that the genes amoA, amoB, and amoC have some of the highest transcription levels in the cell, as also shown in previous studies [55,56,57]. A clustering analysis of the same dataset revealed that amoA, amoB, amoC, amoX, amoY, and amoZ all appear to be co-regulated, and fell into the clusters containing the most highly expressed genes. (Fig. S2; Supplementary Dataset 2). While putative transcriptional promoter sequences can be identified for most amo genes, an obvious conserved promoter motif for all six genes was not identified.
A re-evaluation of these transcriptomic data (see Methods) also revealed amoC6 as the primarily transcribed amoC homolog (Fig. 5), thus confirming the identification of a unique AmoC6 peptide from a Tricine-SDS-PAGE band digested with chymotrypsin (Supplementary Discussion; Supplementary Dataset 1). Together this indicates that AmoC6 is the primary structural AmoC homolog in the AMO complex of N. viennensis, at least under the applied growth conditions.
Transcriptomics of the marine strain, Nitrosopumilus maritimus, also showed high expression of amoA, amoB, amoC, amoX, and amoY (Nmar_1506). The gene amoZ (Nmar_1507), albeit syntenic with amoY, exhibited lower expression levels .
The three newly proposed AMO subunits were also inspected in proteomic datasets that were generated with methods allowing for the improved recovery of membrane proteins. All six of the known and proposed subunits were found in membrane fractions from N. viennensis from a previous study  as well as in the proteome of N. maritimus . In other proteomic studies of AOA [58, 59], the three new subunits were not always present, likely due to their small size and limited number of trypsin cleavage sites.
Structural search for missing components in the archaeal AMO complex
As previously observed , comparisons of the amino acid sequences of the three subunits AmoA, AmoB, and AmoC from archaea with those of bacteria indicate that the primary differences between the archaeal AMO subunits and the bacterial AMO subunits are missing transmembrane helices, at least one in AmoB and two in AmoC, and a missing C-terminal soluble portion found in bacterial AmoB/PmoB (Figs. S3–S5). These observations also hold true for the new clade of archaeal AMO recently discovered in the Thermoplasmata phylum . A HMMER search using the extended regions of the bacterial homologs against the genomes of collected AOA did not reveal any significant similarities. Therefore, a general structural search using Phobius  was carried out with the N. viennensis genome to search for genes that could encode a protein with the following criteria: (i) 1–3 transmembrane helices, (ii) conservation across all AOA , and (iii) present in the top 100 transcribed genes  (similar levels as the primary AMO subunits). This revealed six possible candidates (Table 2). The only candidates to meet the structural requirements while maintaining syntenic and similar patterns of migration in BN-PAGE were amoX, amoY, and amoZ.
The addition of the three proposed subunits in archaea increases the number of transmembrane helices from 10–11 to approximately 14 per protomer making it comparable to the number found in bacterial crystal structures of pMMO where each protomer of the trimer (i.e., one unit of PmoABC), contains 14–15 transmembrane helices [23, 63].
Predicted structure of the archaeal AMO complex supports the integration of new subunits
To gain insights into the structural context of the archaeal AMO complex in the light of three additionally proposed subunits, a structural model for the organization of the N. viennensis AMO complex was obtained by employing the multimer-capable version of AlphaFold 2.1 [64,65,66]. The resultant models were all similar and represented confident predictions (top model, pLDDT = 71.4 and ptm score = 0.668). All predicted transmembrane helices from AmoX, AmoY, and AmoZ play a role in anchoring the complex in the membrane along with the transmembrane helices from AmoA, AmoB, and AmoC (Fig. 4A). Additionally, the N-terminal domain of AmoZ was predicted to contain two alpha helices that interact with the N-terminal domain of AmoB, thereby possibly replacing the role of the missing C-terminal soluble domain found in PmoB and offering the final piece of the missing complex in archaea (additional information in Supplementary Discussion). A disulfide bond was also predicted to form within the soluble domain of AmoZ. The overall structure is comparable to a protomer of the pMMO complex (Fig. S6).
To compare the degree of conservation of the predicted hexameric organization of the AMO complex, a structural model of the AMO complex of N. cavascurensis was also obtained (Fig. 4B). The resultant models were similar in their overall arrangement to each other and to the N. viennensis model, with high overall confidence scores (top model, pLDDT = 77.7 and ptm score = 0.591). Differences between the N. viennensis and N. cavascurensis models include the localization of the transmembrane (TM) helix of AmoZ. In N. viennensis the TM helix is predicted to interact mostly with the TM helix of AmoY, while in N. cavascurensis it is predicted to interact with the TMs of AmoB and AmoA (Figs. 4A, B, S7A, C). This would affect the relative positioning of the N-terminal domain of AmoZ with respect to the AmoB soluble domain, allowing for a more “open” conformation. However, the extended loop connecting the N-terminal pair of helices in AmoZ with the TM domain theoretically allows for some flexibility (additional information in Supplementary Discussion, Fig. S8).
Data from cross-linking experiments in N. viennensis were mapped to the predicted model and strongly supported the predicted interactions (Fig. 4D) with some exceptions. Out of 67 unique observed cross-links, 27 (40%) satisfied a maximum solvent accessible surface distance (SASD) threshold of ≤35 Å (Fig. 4E) and involved all subunit combinations with the exception of AmoZ (Fig. 4F). AmoZ only participated in cross-linking interactions >35 Å, which supports a weaker association with the complex as observed in the BN-PAGE migration patterns.
The archaeal AMO complex is a key enzyme of AOA energy metabolism that is highly expressed in all ammonia oxidizing organisms investigated and has large implications for the environment due to its overwhelming presence in many ecosystems [8,9,10,11,12,13,14, 67]. The work here profits from the recent improvements in the cultivation of AOA in continuous cultures (Melcher et al. in preparation) and presents novel biochemical and comparative genomic evidence on the composition of the AMO complex in Nitrososphaera viennensis and other AOA that contrasts with the proposed composition of this complex within AOB.
The present analysis has verified that AmoX, NVIE_004540, and NVIE_004550 are all likely present within the archaeal AMO complex and proposes the naming of NVIE_004540 and NVIE_004550 as AmoY and AmoZ, respectively. This finding is based on a host of independent analyses including proteomic, genomic, transcriptomic, structural, and modeling approaches. The presence of six subunits rather than three is unique to the archaeal domain and could represent a more complex regulatory strategy for the AMO complex in archaea. Differences in the ammonia oxidation pathway are already well established between the archaeal and bacterial domains (i.e., unresolved second step in archaea [19, 21]; iron-based c cytochromes [68, 69] and ubiquinone in bacteria [70, 71] vs. copper-based plastocyanins [15, 16] and menaquinone in archaea ). The varying characteristics within the AMO complex observed in this work further underscore these differences and add to a growing body of evidence that AOA and AOB participate in nitrification under different environmental and/or functional constraints.
In blue native PAGE protein gels, the AMO complex in both N. viennensis and Nitrosocaldus cavascurensis migrated well above the predicted height of a trimeric protomer complex, even when considering the additional subunits (predicted molecular weight of a homotrimeric complex with six subunits per protomer: 296.9 kDa N. viennensis; 305.1 kDa N. cavascurensis). The archaeal AMO bands are also observed at a higher molecular weight in the gel when compared to the homologous bacterial PMO complex from a Methylomirabilis species that was also extracted using n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM) . This could be explained by differences in membrane composition of the strains or potential differences in oligomerization of the protomer. AOA contain unique ether-linked lipids (i.e., crenarchaeols) [37, 74,75,76,77,78] and rely on a proteinaceous S-layer rather than an outer membrane to create a pseudo-periplasmic space [52, 53]. The observation of three distinct peaks of AMO can most likely be explained by the co-migration with other proteins or complexes that it could be physically interacting with, in particular with the S-layer protein.
Previous work on bacteria that rely on CuMMOs have identified other putative proteins involved with the complex. Monocistronic transcripts containing amoABC from the AOB Nitrosococcus oceani ATCC 19707 contained two additional genes assigned as amoR and amoD . The amoR gene was found to be only present in Nitrosococcus and was therefore not thought to be a conserved part of bacterial AMO. A recent study indicated that AmoD/PmoD (and likely the homologous AmoE) play crucial roles in copper homeostasis, but they are not suspected to be a structural part of any CuMMO complex . Rather, crystal and cryo-EM structures of bacterial PMO have consistently confirmed a trimeric protomer structure with one subunit of PmoA, PmoB, and PmoC making up each protomer [22,23,24,25,26,27,28].
Although there is debate on which subunit harbors the primary active site in CuMMO complexes, there is clear evidence that the metal site(s) in PmoC plays a critical role in the complex of methanotrophs [27, 28, 31, 32]. While the archaeal AmoC lacks a substantial section found in all bacteria that corresponds to two transmembrane helices (Fig. S5), the metal site observed in earlier crystal structures as well as the newly proposed metal site identified via cryo-EM , are conserved across all archaeal and bacterial species (Fig. S5). The importance of this subunit is also supported by site directed mutagenesis studies in the genetically tractable Actinobacteria that contain the homologous hydrocarbon monooxygenase .
The soil model AOA, N. viennensis, like most other soil dwelling AOA from the family Nitrososphaeraceae, encodes multiple homologs of the amoC gene while retaining only single copies of amoA and amoB  (Supplementary Dataset 2). Additional copies of amoC that are spatially disconnected from the AMO operon are encoded by some terrestrial AOB and were implicated in stress response based on transcriptional studies [81, 82]. Within Nitrososphaeraceae, no conserved AMO operons exist (Fig. 3). Duplications of the amoC gene (spatially distant from the other AMO genes) also occur in some species of the AOA marine associated family (Nitrosopumilaceae) and in two MAGs from AOA thermophiles (Nitrosocaldaceae), all discovered in sediments [51, 83, 84]. An amoC duplication is also found in an AOA sponge symbiont and copies of archaeal amoC are even found in marine viruses . These findings together may indicate the metabolic importance of the AmoC subunit for ecophysiological adaptations in ammonia oxidation. While this work identified one particular AmoC (AmoC6; NVIE_028540) to be the primary homolog within the complex of N. viennensis, it is possible that (some of) the other AmoC subunits, which arose by gene duplications at the genus level (Fig. S9), might be incorporated under certain environmental conditions and provide different activity profiles to the enzyme.
Beyond comparative genomics, the only confirmed structural information for archaea stems from the crystal structure of a heterologously expressed AmoB originating from Candidatus Nitrosocaldus yellowstonensis . This structure confirmed the lack of the C-terminal cupredoxin domain and revealed an extended amino acid region not found in bacteria made up of two helices and two loops. It was proposed that this additional region could help stabilize the existing cupredoxin domain as supportive interactions are lacking due to the absence of the C-terminal domain. However, this amino acid extension is only found within the proposed genus of Nitrosocaldus (Fig. S4). It is more likely that the soluble domain of AmoZ, which is conserved across all AOA, is conferring this stabilizing role.
In the absence of additional structure-function analyses, it is unclear if the additional subunits in the archaeal complex simply reflect the vast evolutionary distance to all other known protein complexes of the CuMMO family , or if this difference in structure also has relevant functional implications. For instance, the bacterial AMO complexes are promiscuous enzymes able to oxidize methane and other compounds [87,88,89,90]. Such investigations on alternative substrates have not yet been performed with the archaeal complex but would be important for evaluating the functional role of archaea (and possibly the new subunits) in the environment. Additionally, differences in the AMO complex between AOA species have been identified that have the potential to affect the function of the AMO complex. This includes the extra AmoB loop found within Nitrosocaldus, but is also clearly demonstrated by the newly proposed subunit AmoZ. The genus Nitrososphaera and the family Nitrosocaldaceae (both investigated in this study) are predicted to form a disulfide bond linking the two alpha helices making up the soluble domain of AmoZ (Figs. S7B, D, S10C) via two cysteines that are not conserved in other AOA. Additionally, the genus Nitrosocosmicus is predicted to contain an additional zinc ribbon domain represented by four cysteine residues at the C-terminal end, presumably residing within the cytoplasm (Fig. S10C). The observations of a disulfide bond and zinc ribbon domain within certain AOA lineages could be linked to sensitivity to reactive oxygen species and unique regulation strategies, respectively, and may reflect unique patterns of evolution that complement yet unknown aspects of the metabolism of these specific groups.
Regardless of species-specific differences in archaea, the overall predicted archaeal structure, with the new subunits, is reflective of the known bacterial protomer composition (Fig. S6). Definitive proof of the oligomerization and organization of these subunits will not be possible until a definitive structure (i.e., crystal or cryo-EM) of archaeal AMO is realized. Putative protomer interaction sites in the cryo-EM structure of Methylococcus capsulatus str Bath (PDB structure 7S4H)  appear to be in the section of PmoB that is missing in archaea (Fig. S4). However, the placement of AmoY and AmoZ on the outer regions of the protomer could be facilitating these interactions instead (Fig. S7). This could also explain the high amount of SASD violating interactions between AmoY and AmoZ as the analysis only takes into account a single protomer (Fig. 4F). It is possible that these interactions may instead be between subunits of AmoY and AmoZ in different protomers. Therefore, the predicted protomer models of N. viennensis and N. cavascurensis do not rule out the possibility of a trimeric archaeal AMO complex. With respect to orientation, the present modeling approach is not able to predict exactly how the archaeal AMO sits in the membrane. However, it is likely that the active site as well as the soluble AmoB and AmoZ domains are situated toward the pseudo-periplasmic space. This is supported by previous modeling efforts of nutrient transport in the S-layer of AOA  as well as activity-based immunogold labeling of CuMMO complexes in AOB and methanotrophs .
In conclusion, this study provides evidence through genomic, proteomic, and transcriptomic data for the presence of AmoX and the inclusion of AmoY and AmoZ as subunits within the archaeal AMO complex. A single protomer of the archaeal AMO would therefore consist of six subunits instead of three as in other complexes of the CuMMO family. The addition of the new subunits would make the number of transmembrane helices comparable to CuMMO complexes found within bacteria. As the anchoring of pMMO in the membrane has previously been shown to be critical for its activity [26, 28], it seems plausible that the newly identified subunits play an important role for the structural and functional integrity of the archaeal AMO complex. The presence of a soluble domain within AmoZ that could replace the stabilizing function of the missing soluble domain in AmoB also fulfills a potentially crucial missing piece of the AMO complex. Since AmoXYZ appear to have important structural roles, it will be imperative to include all subunits in future expression and structural studies of this environmentally relevant protein complex in archaea. Considering the wide distribution of AOA in virtually all ecosystems [8,9,10,11,12,13,14, 34] and their ecological relevance, developing genetic tools for AOA and improving their biomass production will be needed to enable structure-function analysis and to elucidate the full pathway of ammonia oxidation in these archaea.
All proteomic data was deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via PRIDE  partner repository with identifiers PXD035349, PXD034632, and PXD034475 for BN-Page of N. viennensis, BN-PAGE of N. cavascurensis, and cross-linked samples, respectively. Relevant scripts and code for data analysis can be found at the GitHub repository https://github.com/hodgskiss/Archaeal_AMO.
Wong-Chong GM, Loehr RC. The kinetics of microbial nitrification. Water Res. 1975;9:1099–106.
Hyman MR, Wood PM. Suicidal inactivation and labelling of ammonia monooxygenase by acetylene. Biochem J. 1985;227:719–25.
Hollocher TC, Tate ME, Nicholas DJ. Oxidation of ammonia by Nitrosomonas europaea. Definitive 18O-tracer evidence that hydroxylamine formation involves a monooxygenase. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:10834–6.
Winogradsky S. Recherches sur les organismes de la nitrification. Ann Inst Pateur. 1890;4:213–31.
Könneke M, Bernhard AE, De La Torre JR, Walker CB, Waterbury JB, Stahl DA. Isolation of an autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon. Nature. 2005;437:543–6.
Treusch AH, Leininger S, Kietzin A, Schuster SC, Klenk HP, Schleper C. Novel genes for nitrite reductase and Amo-related proteins indicate a role of uncultivated mesophilic crenarchaeota in nitrogen cycling. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1985–95.
Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg JF, Halpern AL, Rusch D, Eisen JA, et al. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science. 2004;304:66–74.
Leininger S, Urich T, Schloter M, Schwark L, Qi J, Nicol GW, et al. Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils. Nature. 2006;442:806–9.
Nicol GW, Leininger S, Schleper C, Prosser JI. The influence of soil pH on the diversity, abundance and transcriptional activity of ammonia oxidizing archaea and bacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:2966–78.
Adair KL, Schwartz E. Evidence that ammonia-oxidizing archaea are more abundant than ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in semiarid soils of northern Arizona, USA. Micro Ecol. 2008;56:420–6.
Karner MB, Delong EF, Karl DM. Archaeal dominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific Ocean. Nature. 2001;409:507–10.
Shi Y, Tyson GW, Eppley JM, Delong EF. Integrated metatranscriptomic and metagenomic analyses of stratified microbial assemblages in the open ocean. ISME J. 2011;5:999–1013.
Baker BJ, Lesniewski RA, Dick GJ. Genome-enabled transcriptomics reveals archaeal populations that drive nitrification in a deep-sea hydrothermal plume. ISME J. 2012;6:2269–79.
Hollibaugh JT, Gifford S, Sharma S, Bano N, Moran MA. Metatranscriptomic analysis of ammonia-oxidizing organisms in an estuarine bacterioplankton assemblage. ISME J. 2011;5:866–78.
Kerou M, Offre P, Valledor L, Abby SS, Melcher M, Nagler M, et al. Proteomics and comparative genomics of Nitrososphaera viennensis reveal the core genome and adaptations of archaeal ammonia oxidizers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E7937–46.
Walker CB, De La Torre JR, Klotz MG, Urakawa H, Pinel N, Arp DJ, et al. Nitrosopumilus maritimus genome reveals unique mechanisms for nitrification and autotrophy in globally distributed marine crenarchaea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:8818–23.
Berg IA, Kockelkorn D, Buckel W, Fuchs G. A 3-hydroxypropionate 4-hydroxybutyrate autotrophic carbon dioxide assimilation pathway in archaea. Science. 2007;218:1782–6.
Könneke M, Schubert DM, Brown PC, Hügler M, Standfest S, Schwander T, et al. Ammonia-oxidizing archaea use the most energy-efficient aerobic pathway for CO2 fixation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:8239–44.
Lancaster KM, Caranto JD, Majer SH, Smith MA. Alternative bioenergy: updates to and challenges in nitrification metalloenzymology. Joule. 2018;2:1–21.
Simon J, Klotz MG. Diversity and evolution of bioenergetic systems involved in microbial nitrogen compound transformations. Biochim Biophys Acta - Bioenerg. 2013;1827:114–35.
Kozlowski JA, Stieglmeier M, Schleper C, Klotz MG, Stein LY. Pathways and key intermediates required for obligate aerobic ammonia-dependent chemolithotrophy in bacteria and Thaumarchaeota. ISME J. 2016;10:1836–45.
Lieberman RL, Rosenzweig AC. Crystal structure of a membrane-bound metalloenzyme that catalyses the biological oxidation of methane. Nature. 2005;434:177–82.
Hakemian AS, Kondapalli KC, Telser J, Hoffman BM, Stemmler TL, Rosenzweig AC. The metal centres of particulate methane monooxygenase from Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Biochemistry. 2008;47:6793–801.
Smith SM, Rawat S, Telser J, Hoffman BM, Stemmler TL, Rosenzweig AC. Crystal structure and characterization of particulate methane monooxygenase from Methylocystis species strain M. Biochemistry. 2011;50:10231–40.
Sirajuddin S, Barupala D, Helling S, Marcus K, Stemmler TL, Rosenzweig AC. Effects of zinc on particulate methane monooxygenase activity and structure. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:21782–94.
Ro SY, Ross MO, Deng YW, Batelu S, Lawton TJ, Hurley JD, et al. From micelles to bicelles: effect of the membrane on particulate methane monooxygenase activity. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:10457–65.
Chang WH, Lin HH, Tsai IK, Huang SH, Chung SC, Tu IP, et al. Copper centers in the cryo-EM structure of particulate methane monooxygenase reveal the catalytic machinery of methane oxidation. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143:9922–32.
Koo CW, Tucci FJ, He Y, Rosenzweig AC. Recovery of particulate methane monooxygenase structure and activity in a lipid bilayer. Science. 2022;375:1287–91.
Balasubramanian R, Smith SM, Rawat S, Yatsunyk LA, Stemmler TL, Rosenzweig AC. Oxidation of methane by a biological dicopper centre. Nature. 2010;465:115–9.
Op den Camp HJM, Islam T, Stott MB, Harhangi HR, Hynes A, Schouten S, et al. Environmental, genomic and taxonomic perspectives on methanotrophic Verrucomicrobia. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2009;1:293–306.
Ross MO, MacMillan F, Wang J, Nisthal A, Lawton TJ, Olafson BD, et al. Particulate methane monooxygenase contains only mononuclear copper centers. Science. 2019;364:566–70.
Liew EF, Tong D, Coleman NV, Holmes AJ. Mutagenesis of the hydrocarbon monooxygenase indicates a metal centre in subunit-C, and not subunit-B, is essential for copper-containing membrane monooxygenase activity. Microbiology. 2014;160:1267–77.
Musiani F, Broll V, Evangelisti E, Ciurli S. The model structure of the copper-dependent ammonia monooxygenase. JBIC J Biol Inorg Chem. 2020;25:995–1007.
Alves RJE, Minh BQ, Urich T, Von Haeseler A, Schleper C. Unifying the global phylogeny and environmental distribution of ammonia-oxidising archaea based on amoA genes. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1517.
Khadka R, Clothier L, Wang L, Lim CK, Klotz MG, Dunfield PF. Evolutionary history of copper membrane monooxygenases. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2493.
Bartossek R, Spang A, Weidler G, Lanzen A, Schleper C. Metagenomic analysis of ammonia-oxidizing archaea affiliated with the soil group. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:208.
De La Torre JR, Walker CB, Ingalls AE, Könneke M, Stahl DA. Cultivation of a thermophilic ammonia oxidizing archaeon synthesizing crenarchaeol. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:810–8.
Tourna M, Stieglmeier M, Spang A, Könneke M, Schintlmeister A, Urich T. Nitrososphaera viennensis, an ammonia oxidizing archaeon from soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:8420–5.
Wittig I, Braun H-P, Schägger H. Blue native PAGE. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:418–28.
Reisinger V, Eichacker LA. Solubilization of membrane protein complexes for blue native PAGE. J Proteom. 2008;71:277–83.
De Almeida NM, Wessels HJCT, De Graaf RM, Ferousi C, Jetten MSM, Keltjens JT, et al. Membrane-bound electron transport systems of an anammox bacterium: a complexome analysis. Biochim Biophys Acta - Bioenerg. 2016;1857:1694–704.
Berger S, Cabrera-orefice A, Jetten MSM, Brandt U, Welte CU. Investigation of central energy metabolism-related protein complexes of ANME-2d methanotrophic archaea by complexome profiling. BBA - Bioenerg. 2021;1862:148308.
Hevler JF, Lukassen MV, Cabrera‐Orefice A, Arnold S, Pronker MF, Franc V, et al. Selective cross‐linking of coinciding protein assemblies by in‐gel cross‐linking mass spectrometry. EMBO J. 2021;40:e106174.
Perez-Riverol Y, Csordas A, Bai J, Bernal-Llinares M, Hewapathirana S, Kundu DJ, et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D442–50.
Melcher M, Hodgskiss LH, Mardini MA, Schleper C, Rittmann SMKR. Analysis of biomass productivity and physiology of Nitrososphaera viennensis grown in continuous culture. Frontiers in Microbiology. (in preparation) 14:206.
Abby SS, Kerou M, Schleper C. Ancestral reconstructions decipher major adaptations of ammonia-oxidizing archaea upon radiation into moderate terrestrial and marine environments. MBio. 2020;11:e02371–20.
Rinke C, Chuvochina M, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil PA, Davín AA, Waite DW, et al. A standardized archaeal taxonomy for the Genome Taxonomy Database. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6:946–59.
Abby SS, Melcher M, Kerou M, Krupovic M, Stieglmeier M, Rossel C, et al. Candidatus Nitrosocaldus cavascurensis, an ammonia oxidizing, extremely thermophilic archaeon with a highly mobile genome. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:28.
Nicol GW, Schleper C. Ammonia-oxidising Crenarchaeota: important players in the nitrogen cycle? Trends Microbiol. 2006;14:207–12.
Sheridan PO, Raguideau S, Quince C, Holden J, Zhang L, Gaze WH, et al. Gene duplication drives genome expansion in a major lineage of Thaumarchaeota. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5494.
Luo Z-H, Narsing Rao MP, Chen H, Hua Z-S, Li Q, Hedlund BP, et al. Genomic insights of “Candidatus Nitrosocaldaceae” based on nine new metagenome-assembled genomes, including “Candidatus Nitrosothermus” gen nov. and two new species of “Candidatus Nitrosocaldus”. Front Microbiol. 2021;11:608832.
Stieglmeier M, Klingl A, Alves RJE, Rittmann SKMR, Melcher M, Leisch N, et al. Nitrososphaera viennensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic and mesophilic, ammonia-oxidizing archaeon from soil and a member of the archaeal phylum Thaumarchaeota. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:2738–52.
Albers SV, Meyer BH. The archaeal cell envelope. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:414–26.
Reyes C, Hodgskiss LH, Kerou M, Pribasnig T, Abby SS, Bayer B, et al. Genome wide transcriptomic analysis of the soil ammonia oxidizing archaeon Nitrososphaera viennensis upon exposure to copper limitation. ISME J. 2020;14:2659–74.
Qin W, Amin SA, Lundeen RA, Heal KR, Martens-Habbena W, Turkarslan S, et al. Stress response of a marine ammonia-oxidizing archaeon informs physiological status of environmental populations. ISME J. 2017;12:508–19.
Carini P, Dupont CL, Santoro AE. Patterns of thaumarchaeal gene expression in culture and diverse marine environments. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:2112–24.
Stewart FJ, Ulloa O, Delong EF. Microbial metatranscriptomics in a permanent marine oxygen minimum zone. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:23–40.
Bayer B, Pelikan C, Bittner MJ, Reinthaler T, Könneke M, Herndl GJ, et al. Proteomic response of three marine ammonia-oxidizing archaea to hydrogen peroxide and their metabolic interactions with a heterotrophic alphaproteobacterium. mSystems. 2019;4:e00181–19.
Santoro AE, Dupont CL, Richter RA, Craig MT, Carini P, McIlvin MR, et al. Genomic and proteomic characterization of ‘Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus brevis’: an ammonia-oxidizing archaeon from the open ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:1173–8.
Tolar BB, Herrmann J, Bargar JR, van den Bedem H, Wakatsuki S, Francis CA. Integrated structural biology and molecular ecology of N-cycling enzymes from ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2017;9:484–91.
Diamond S, Lavy A, Crits-Christoph A, Matheus Carnevali PB, Sharrar A, Williams KH, et al. Soils and sediments host Thermoplasmata archaea encoding novel copper membrane monooxygenases (CuMMOs). ISME J. 2022;16:1348–62.
Käll L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer ELL. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J Mol Biol. 2004;338:1027–36.
Hakemian AS, Rosenzweig AC. The biochemistry of methane oxidation. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:223–41.
Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583–9.
Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, Nair S, Natassia C, Yordanova G, et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D439–D444.
Evans R, O’Neill M, Pritzel A, Antropova N, Senior A, Green T, et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034.
Klotz MG, Stein LY. Nitrifier genomics and evolution of the nitrogen cycle. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;278:146–56.
Yamanaka T, Shinra M. Cytochrome c-552 and cytochrome c-554 derived from Nitrosomonas europaea. J Biochem. 1974;75:1265–73.
Arciero DM, Hooper AB, Balny C. Spectroscopic and rapid kinetic studies of reduction of cytochrome c554 by hydroxylamine oxidoreductase from Nitrosomonas europaea. Biochemistry. 1991;30:11466–72.
Hooper AB, Erickson RH, Terry KR. Electron transport systems of Nitrosomonas: isolation of a membrane-envelope fraction. J Bacteriol. 1972;110:430–8.
Whittaker M, Bergmann D, Arciero D, Hooper AB. Electron transfer during the oxidation of ammonia by the chemolithotrophic bacterium Nitrosomonas europaea. Biochim Biophys Acta - Bioenerg. 2000;1459:346–55.
Elling FJ, Becker KW, Könneke M, Schröder JM, Kellermann MY, Thomm M, et al. Respiratory quinones in Archaea: phylogenetic distribution and application as biomarkers in the marine environment. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:692–707.
Versantvoort W, Guerrero-Castillo S, Wessels HJCT, Van Niftrik L, Jetten MSM, Brandt U, et al. Complexome analysis of the nitrite-dependent methanotroph Methylomirabilis lanthanidiphila. Biochim Biophys Acta - Bioenerg. 2019;1860:734–44.
Pitcher A, Rychlik N, Hopmans EC, Spieck E, Rijpstra WIC, Ossebaar J, et al. Crenarchaeol dominates the membrane lipids of Candidatus Nitrososphaera gargensis, a thermophilic Group I.1b Archaeon. ISME J. 2010;4:542–52.
Villanueva L, Damsté JSS, Schouten S. A re-evaluation of the archaeal membrane lipid biosynthetic pathway. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:438–48.
Sinninghe Damsté JS, Schouten S, Hopmans EC, Van Duin ACT, Geenevasen JAJ. Crenarchaeol: the characteristic core glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraether membrane lipid of cosmopolitan pelagic crenarchaeota. J Lipid Res. 2002;43:1641–51.
Sinninghe Damsté JS, Rijpstra WIC, Hopmans EC, Jung MY, Kim JG, Rhee SK, et al. Intact polar and core glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraether lipids of group I.1a and I.1b Thaumarchaeota in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:6866–74.
Elling FJ, Könneke M, Mußmann M, Greve A, Hinrichs KU. Influence of temperature, pH, and salinity on membrane lipid composition and TEX86 of marine planktonic thaumarchaeal isolates. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2015;171:238–55.
El Sheikh AF, Poret-Peterson AT, Klotz MG. Characterization of two new genes, amoR and amoD, in the amo operon of the marine ammonia oxidizer Nitrosococcus oceani ATCC 19707. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:312–8.
Fisher OS, Kenney GE, Ross MO, Ro SY, Lemma BE, Batelu S, et al. Characterization of a long overlooked copper protein from methane- and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4276.
Berube PM, Samudrala R, Stahl DA. Transcription of all amoC copies is associated with recovery of Nitrosomonas europaea from ammonia starvation. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:3935–44.
Berube PM, Stahl DA. The divergent AmoC3 subunit of ammonia monooxygenase functions as part of a stress response system in Nitrosomonas europaea. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:3448–56.
Lebedeva EV, Hatzenpichler R, Pelletier E, Schuster N, Hauzmayer S, Bulaev A, et al. Enrichment and genome sequence of the group I.1a ammonia-oxidizing archaeon ‘Ca. Nitrosotenuis uzonensis’ representing a clade globally distributed in thermal habitats. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80835.
Qin W, Heal KR, Ramdasi R, Kobelt JN, Martens-Habbena W, Bertagnolli AD, et al. Nitrosopumilus maritimus gen. nov., sp. nov., Nitrosopumilus cobalaminigenes sp. nov., Nitrosopumilus oxyclinae sp. nov., and Nitrosopumilus ureiphilus sp. nov., four marine ammonia-oxidizing archaea of the phylum Thaumarchaeota. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:5067–79.
Ahlgren NA, Fuchsman CA, Rocap G, Fuhrman JA. Discovery of several novel, widespread, and ecologically distinct marine Thaumarchaeota viruses that encode amoC nitrification genes. ISME J. 2019;13:618–31.
Lawton TJ, Ham J, Sun T, Rosenzweig AC. Structural conservation of the B subunit in the ammonia monooxygenase/particulate methane monooxygenase superfamily. Proteins. 2014;82:2263–7.
Hyman MR, Wood PM. Methane oxidation by Nitrosomonas europaea. Biochem J. 1983;212:31–37.
Hyman MR, Wood PM. Ethylene oxidation by Nitrosomonas europaea. Arch Microbiol. 1984;137:155–8.
Hyman MR, Murton IB, Arp DJ. Interaction of ammonia monooxygenase from Nitrosomonas europaea with alkanes, alkenes, and alkynes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988;54:3187–90.
Jones RD, Morita RY. Methane oxidation by Nitrosococcus oceanus and Nitrosomonas europaea. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;45:401–10.
Li P, Herrmann J, Tolar BB, Poitevin F, Ramdasi R, Bargar JR, et al. Nutrient transport suggests an evolutionary basis for charged archaeal surface layer proteins. ISME J. 2018;12:2389–402.
Sakoula D, Smith GJ, Frank J, Mesman RJ, Kop LFM, Blom P, et al. Universal activity-based labeling method for ammonia- and alkane-oxidizing bacteria. ISME J. 2022;16:958–71.
We thank Anas Mohammed Mardini for excellent technical assistance in the cultivation of N. viennensis and Wolfram Weckwerth for valuable input in the initial discussions of the project. We also thank Florian Sikora and Dr. Boris Görke for technical assistance and usage of the OneShot machine for cell lysis and Dr. Stephanie Eichorst for assistance and usage of the ultracentrifuge. We are also appreciative of Dr. Thomas Rattei, Florian Goldenberg, and Johann Dorn of the Division of Computational Systems Biology (CUBE) for providing maintenance and access to the Life Science Computer Cluster (LiSC) at the University of Vienna.
This project was supported by Doktoratskolleg (DK) plus: Microbial nitrogen cycling—from single cells to ecosystems (Austrian Science Fund W1257), ERC Advanced Grant TACKLE (No. 695192), and the European Union’s Horizon 2021–2027 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101079299.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hodgskiss, L.H., Melcher, M., Kerou, M. et al. Unexpected complexity of the ammonia monooxygenase in archaea. ISME J (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01367-3